Suche nach Schlagworten '00001337'
263 entries found on 14 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 20Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),
Title: Participatory integrated assessment methods |
---|
Title (other): An assessment of their usefulness to the European Environmental Agency |
Abstract This report gives a critical appraisal of participatory methods of Integrated Environmental Assessment (IEA) and evaluates the applicability of these methods to the EEA's work on IEAs. The report is a background document on using participatory integrated assessments in the context of preparations for the EEA's next report on the state of and outlook for the pan-European environment, scheduled for publication in 2004/2005.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents .........59 |
Author: Vos, Hans |
Series Title: Europäische Umweltagentur - Technical report ; 64 |
Contributer: Europäische Umweltagentur |
Year: 2001 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: assessmentevaluationEUenvironmental research |
Subject: European Communities. European UnionProtection of the environment |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Umweltagentur (http://www.eea.eu.int/) |
Title: Evaluation of the functioning of the European judical network in civil and commercial matters |
---|
Title (other): Final report |
Table of Contents List of Tables List of Figures List of Abbreviations 1. SUMMARY 1.1. Summary of conclusions 1.2. Summary of Recommendations 2. INTRODUCTION 2.1. Description of the Network instrument 2.2. Purpose and scope of the evaluation 3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 3.1. Research design 3.1.1. Construction of the intervention logic 3.1.2. Methods of data collection and analysis 3.2. Analysis of collected data 4. EVALUATION RESULTS 4.1. Functioning of the Network 4.1.1. Internal coherence of objectives 4.1.2. Current set-up of the Network 4.1.3. The website 4.1.4. Contact points and organisation at national level 4.1.5. The meetings of contact points and Network members 4.1.6. CIRCA 4.1.7. Requests for judicial co-operation and their registration 4.1.8. Analysis on functioning of the Network 4.1.9. Conclusions on Network functioning 4.2. Interaction of the Network members and components 4.2.1. Coordination amongst national contact points and / or national networks 4.2.2. Role of Network members as intermediary vis- à -vis to ultimate users 4.2.3. Interaction with experts who monitor legislative work in civil law 4.2.4. Analysis on interaction of the Network members and components 4.2.5. Conclusions on interaction of the Network members and components 4.3. Results and impacts of the Network 4.3.1. Facilitation of relations between courts 4.3.2. Impacts of the Network related to judicial cooperation 4.3.3. Impacts of the Network related to the principle of mutual recognition 4.3.4. Impacts of the Network related to preparedness for entry into force of new instruments 4.3.5. Analysis on results and impacts of the Network 4.3.6. Conclusions on results and impacts of the Network 4.4. Coherence of external instruments 4.4.1. Analysis on coherence of external instruments 4.4.2. Conclusions on coherence of external instruments 4.5. Access to justice of legal professions and the |
Author (Corp. Body): The European Evaluation Consortium TEEC |
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Inneres |
Year: 2005 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: JAI /C1/OT ge (2004)3065 | BUDG-02-01-L2 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: evaluationEuropeCommercial Lawnetworklawcivil law |
Subject: European Community law in generalCivil law in generalCommercial law. Company law |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu.int/) |
Title: Global Evaluation of the European Neighbourhood Partnership Instrument |
---|
Abstract The study finds that ENP policy documents and ENPI budgetary allocations are fairly well aligned with the strategic objectives of EU external policy, and that planned interventions are well aligned with partner countries' needs and development priorities. Regarding performance, although ENPI allows for a more flexible and efficient use of resources compared to its predecessors (MEDA and TACIS), it still too early to assess whether these structural improvements has brought about improved results.[European Parliament] |
Series Title:European Parliament - Study |
Author (Corp. Body): Economisti Associati srl Via Rialto Bologna Italy |
Publisher: Europäische Union / Europäisches Parlament |
Year: 2008 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: evaluationbudgetcross border cooperationpartnership |
Subject: International cooperationInternational relationsMoney. Financing |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäisches Parlament (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/) |
Title: Evaluation of EC support to partner countries in the area of energy : Final report |
---|
Title (other): Evaluation of EC support to partner countries in the area of energy : Final report ; Annexes | Evaluation of EC support to partner countries in the area of energy : Executive Summary | Fiche contradictoire : Evaluation of the EC support to Partner Countries in the area of Energy ; 3d column | Quality Grid : Evaluation of EC support to Partner Countries in the area of Energy ; Final Report | Thematic evaluation of EC support to Partner Countries in the area of energy : Ref. 1192 ; EVINFO |
Abstract This evaluation assesses the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability of the European Commissions support to its partner countries in the energy sector. It covers interventions designed or implemented during the 1996-2007 period in all the external cooperation partner countries. This scope of the evaluation is extremely broad and heterogeneous for three major reasons.First, the European Commissions communications analysis shows that the Commissions interventions in the energy sector have aimed to contribute to three very different goals: - Improving access to energy in developing countries as a means of reducing poverty; - Securing energy supplies to the EU; - Improving nuclear safety in the Former Soviet Union (FSU).The first goal is increasingly perceived as an important dimension of the fight against poverty; the two others address vital stakes for European citizens. Ranking these different goals by order of importance has no real meaning. The order in which they are presented in the report has no specific significance and has deliberately been varied...[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. THE EVALUATION 1.1 MANDATE AND SCOPE 1.2 APPROACH 1.3 LIMITS OF THE EVALUATION 2. THE COMMISSION SUPPORT FOR ENERGY 2.1 THE EC STRATEGY 2.2 THE COMMISSIONS INTERVENTION PORTFOLIO IN ENERGY 3. ANSWERS TO EVALUATION QUESTIONS 3.1 RELEVANCE AND INTERNAL CONSISTENCY 3.2 EFFECTIVENESS & SUSTAINABILITY 3.3 IMPACT 3.4 EFFICIENCY 3.5 CO-ORDINATION & COMPLEMENTARITY 3.6 COHERENCE 4. CONCLUSIONS 4.1 OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF THE EC STRATEGY: A CO-OPERATION CYCLE NOT YET FORMALISED, WITH IMPORTANT CONSEQUENCES 4.2. CONCLUSIONS ALONG THE 10 STAGE OF THE CO-OPERATION CYCLE 4.3 EFFECTIVENESS AND SUSTAINABILITY: POSITIVE CONTRIBUTION TO IMPROVED SAFETY OF SEVERALL NPPS, LIMITED EFFECTS ON EU SECURITY OF SUPPLY AND ON POVERTY REDUCTION 4.4 COMMUNITY VALUE ADDED 5. RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 THE SPECIFICS OF THE ENERGY SECTOR 5.2 TWO MAJOR AREAS OF PROGRESS 5.3 ADAPTING THE EUROPEAN COMMISSIONS APPROACH 5.4 IMPROVING KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT TO ENHANCE THE COMMISSIONS LEADERSHIP 5.5 SETTING UP A KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM 5.6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SUMMARISED ANNEXES ANNEX 1 TERMS OF REFERENCE ANNEX 2 INTERVENTION LOGICS ANNEX 3 STRUCTURE OF EVALUATION QUESTIONS, JUDGMENT CRITERIA AND INDICATORS ANNEX 4 CASE STUDIES:SELECTION PROCESS AND FIGURES ANNEX 5 THE COMMISSIONS INTERVENTIONS IN THE ENERGY SECTOR FIGURES ANNEX 6 THE ENERGY SECTOR: ISSUES AT STAKE AND MAIN ACTORS ANNEX 7 THE GREEN PAPERS & THE THREE DIMENSIONS OF THE EC ENERGY DIALOGUE ANNEX 8 FIELD VISIT NOTES ANNEX 9 LIST OF INTERVIEWS ANNEX 10 BIBLIOGRAPHY |
Author (Corp. Body): Aide a? la De?cision Economique |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen | Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid |
Year: 2008 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: EU countriesEnergyDevelopment Aidpovertyevaluationenergy policyenergy supplydevelopment aid EUEuropean Commissionnuclear power plantcooperationsecurity |
Subject: Economic aid and technical assistanceEuropean Community external relationsEnergy policy. Power generation |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu/) |
Title: Evaluation of Commission's external cooperation with partner countries through the organisations of the UN family : final report ; Volume 1 |
---|
Title (other): Evaluation of Commissions external cooperation with partner countries through the organisations of the UN family : Final Report ; Volume IIa Annexes 1 to 9 | Evaluation of Commissions external cooperation with partner countries through the organisations of the UN family : Final Report ; Volume IIb Annexes 10 to 12 on Evaluation Methodology | Evaluation of Commissions external cooperation with partner countries through the organisations of the UN family : Inventory Note (final) | Fiche contradictoire : Evaluation of the Commissions External Cooperation with partner countries through the organisations of the UN family | Evaluation of Commission's external cooperation with partner countries through the organisations of the UN family | Evaluation of Commission's External Cooperation with partner countries through the organisations of the UN family : Ref. 1252 ; EVINFO |
Abstract This evaluation commissioned by the European Commission aims at providing an overall independent assessment of its external cooperation with partner countries through the organisations of the UN family. It covers the partnership between the Commission and the UN to the extent of the Commissions funding of UN interventions. It focuses on development cooperation funds managed by DG RELEX, DEV and AIDCO. The period covered is 1999-2006.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. EVALUATION OBJECTIVES, ORGANISATION AND METHODOLOGY 1.1 EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE 1.2 EVLUATION METHODOLOGY 2. EVALUATION CONTEXT 2.1 HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF THE COMMISSION-UN PARTNERSHIP 2.2 THE EVOLUTION OF THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK 2.3 INVENTORY OF FUNDS CHANNELLED 3. ANSWERS TO EVALUATION QUESTIONS 3.1 EVALUATION QUESTION 1 ON GUIDING CRITERIA 3.2 EVALUATION QUESTION 2 ON SPECIFIC EXPERTISE 3.3 EVALUATION QUESTION 3 ON RESULTS AND IMPACT 3.4 EVALUATION QUESTION 4 ON STRENGTHENING THE UN SYSTEM 3.5 EVALUATION QUESTION 5 ON SCALING UP 3.6 EVALUATION QUESTION 6 ON VISIBILITY 3.7 EVALUATION QUESTION 7 ON IMPLEMENTATION &COST; REDUCTION 3.8 EVALUATION QUESTION 8 ON LEGAL FRAMEWORK 3.9 EVALUATION QUESTION 9 ON COORDINATION AND COMPLEMENTARITY 4. CONCLUSIONS 4.1 OVERALL ASSESSMENT 4.2 GENERAL CHANNELLING FRAMEWORK 4.3 ADDED VALUE OF CHANNELLING FOR THE COMMISSION, FOR THE UN, FOR PARTNER COUNTRIES,AND AS CONVEYED BY THE COMMISSION 4.4 RESULTS & IMPACT 4.5 EFFICIENCY OF THE AID DELIVERY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK 4.6 VISIBILITY 4.7 ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE 5. RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 GENERAL CHANNELLING FRAMEWORK 5.2 EFFICIENCY OF AID DELIVERY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK 5.3 VISIBILITY 5.4 ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE | Volume IIa Annexes 1 to 9 ANNEX 1- TERMS OF REFERENCE ANNEX 2- THE EVALUATION QUESTIONS, JUDGEMENT CRITERIA, INDICATORS AND SOURCES OF INFORMATION ANNEX 3 LIST OF THE SELECTED INTERVENTIONS ANNEX 4 DESCRIPTION FICHES OF THE SELECTED INTERVENTIONS ANNEX 5 DATA COLLECTION GRIDS FOR EACH OF THE SELECTED INTERVENTIONS ANNEX 6 FIELD MISSIONS DEBRIEFING PRESENTATIONS ANNEX 7 SYNOPSIS OF ROM ANALYSIS ANNEX 8 LIST OF PERSONS MET ANNEX 9 BIBLIOGRAPHY Volume IIb Annexes 10 to 12 on Evaluation Methodology ANNEX 10EVALUATION METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH ANNEX 11EVALUATION TOOLS AND CHECKLIST ANNEX 12PYRAMIDAL FOCUS GROUPS AND WORKING GROUPS |
Author (Corp. Body): Aide a? la De?cision Economique |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen |
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid |
Year: 2008 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: EU countriesInternational cooperationevaluationdevelopment aidEUEuropean Commissionfinancial assistanceinternational cooperation cooperationUNO |
Subject: International cooperationEuropean Community funds and other financial instruments |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu/) |
Title: Evaluation of the European Commission's support to the Republic of Guyana : final report ; Volume I Main Report |
---|
Title (other): Evaluation of the European Commission's support to the Republic of Guyana : final report ; Volume II Annexes | Fiche contradictoire : Evaluation of the European Commission's support to the Republic of Guyana | Evaluation of the EC support to the Republic of Guyana : Final Report | Evaluation of the European Commissions support to the republic of Guyana : Ref. 1254 ; EVINFO |
Abstract This report presents the results of the evaluation of the European Commissions support to the Republic of Guyana during the period 1997-2007. This country evaluation aims to provide an overall independent assessment of the Commissions past and current cooperation relations with the Republic of Guyana, and to identify key lessons that would help improve the current and future strategies and programmes of the Commission.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION METHODOLOGY 2. STRATEGIC COOPERATION CONTEXT 2.1 THE EUROPEAN COMMISSIONS DEVELOPMENT POLICY 2.1.1 The European Commissions global development policy 2.1.2 The European Commissions development policy with ACP countries 2.2 GUYANAS CONTEXT 2.2.1 The political context 2.2.2 The economic context 2.2.3 The social context 2.2.4 The environmental context 2.3 GUYANAS DEVELOPMENT POLICY 2.3.1 Guyanas National Development Strategy 2001-2010 2.3.2 Guyanas Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) 2.3.3 The National Competitiveness Strategy for Guyana 2.3.4 The Guyana Action Plan for the sugar sector 2.4 INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN GUYANA 3. THE COMMISSIONS COOPERATION STRATEGY 3.1 THE INTERVENTION LOGIC 3.2 THE COMMISSIONS COOPERATION STRATEGY AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION FOR GUYANA OVER THE PERIOD 1997-2007 3.2.1 The programmable instruments 3.2.2 The non programmable instruments 3.3.3 Overview of the Commissions cooperation strategy and its implementation over the period 1997-2007 4. EVALUATION QUESTIONS 4.1 COVERAGE OF EVALUATION QUESTIONS 4.2 ANSWERS TO EVALUATION QUESTIONS 4.2.1 EQ 1 : Relevance of the Strategy 4.2.2 EQ2 : Protection of coastal belt population 4.2.3 EQ 3: Production capacity 4.2.4 EQ 4 : Social conditions 4.2.5 EQ 5 : Social benefits to local communities 4.2.6 EQ 6 : Efficiency of implementation | 4.2.7 EQ 7: Cross-Cutting Issues 4.2.8 EQ 8: Coordination, Complementarity and Coherence with other donors 5. OVERALL ASSESSMENT 5.1 COMMISSION STRATEGY 5.2 IMPLEMENTATION MODALITIES: FOCUS ON BUDGET SUPPORT 5.3 MAJOR CONSTRAINTS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAMME: CAPACITY BUILDING AND BRAIN DRAIN 6. CONCLUSIONS 6.1 COMMISSION STRATEGY 6.2 IMPACTS OF THE INTERVENTIONS 6.3. IMPLEMENTATION MODALITIES 7. RECOMMENDATIONS 7.1 TO REINFORCE THE COHERENCE, IMPACT AND SUSTAINABILITY OF THE COMMISSIONS STRATEGY IN LINE WITH THE GOGS DEVELOPMENT POLICY AND OTHER DONOR INTERVENTIONS 7.2 TO FOSTER EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF COMMISSION INTERVENTIONS Volume II ANNEX 1 TERMS OF REFERENCE ANNEX 2 INFORMANTS MET BEFORE THE FIELD MISSION ANNEX 3 FIELD MISSION PLANNING & INFORMANTS MET ANNEX 4 BASIC ECONOMIC INDICATORS ANNEX 5 INTERNATIONAL DONOR COOPERATION ANNEX 6 PRESENTATION OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONS ANNEX 7 INFORMATION MATRIX ANNEX 8 - LIST OF INTERVENTIONS ANNEX 9 BIBLIOGRAPHY |
Author (Corp. Body): EGEVAL |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen |
Year: 2008 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Ref. Ares(2010)230470 | Ref. 1254 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: Development AidGuyanaevaluationdevelopment aid policyEUEuropean Commissionskilled workerfinancial assistance Guianacooperation |
Subject: Economic aid and technical assistanceEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIBEuropean Community external relations |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesGuyana |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu/) |
Title: Evaluation of Commission's aid delivery through Development Banks and EIB : Final report ; Volume I |
---|
Title (other): Evaluation of Commission's aid delivery through Development Banks and EIB : Final Report ; Volume IIa Annexes 1 to 10 | Evaluation of Commission's aid delivery through Development Banks and EIB : Final report ; Volume IIb Annexes 11 and 12 on Evaluation Methodology | Evaluation of Commission's aid delivery through Development Banks and EIB : Inventory Note (final) | Evaluation of EC aid delivery through development banks and EIB | Evaluation of EC's aid delivery through development banks and EIB : Ref. 1255 ; EVINFO | Fiche Contradictoire : Evaluation of the EC aid delivery through development banks and EIB |
Abstract This evaluation commissioned by the European Commission aims at providing an overall independent assessment of its aid delivery through Development Banks and the EIB during the period 1999-2006. It concerns financial flows or channelling from the Commission to the aforementioned institutions and covers all geographical areas where such aid delivery took place, except for OECD countries and countries within the mandate of Directorate General Enlargement. It focuses on the funding provided by the Commissions Directorate General for External Relations (DG RELEX), Directorate General for Development (DG DEV), and EuropeAid Co-operation Office (AIDCO) to the World Bank (WB) and the European Investment Bank (EIB).[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS OF KEY TERMS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. EVALUATION OBJECTIVES, SCOPE AND CONTEXT 1.1 EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE 1.2 OVERALL FRAMEWORK OF THE COOPERATION 1.3 INVENTORY OF FUNDS CHANNELLED 2. EVALUATION METHODOLOGY 2.1 EVALUATION PROCESS AND STRUCTURE 2.2 EVALUATION APPROACH AND INFORMATION SOURCES 2.2.1 A structured approach 2.2.2 Detailed description of the different building stones of the evaluation 2.3 CHALLENGES AND LIMITS 3. ANSWERS TO EVALUATION QUESTIONS 3.1 EVALUATION QUESTION 1 ON THE RATIONALE BEHIND THE CHANNELLING 3.1.1 Decision-making process and guidance 3.1.2 The rationale behind the channelling 3.1.3 Reasons for the observed evolution in channelled aid 3.2 EVALUATION QUESTION 2 ON SCALING UP OF AID 3.2.1 Evolution of ODA and the link with channelling 3.2.2 Facilitation of disbursement by the Commission and to the beneficiaries 3.2.3 Leverage effects of the Commissions financial contributions and presence 3.3 EVALUATION QUESTION 3 ON RESULTS/IMPACT 3.3.1 Coherence of objectives 3.3.2 Sustainable achievement of results 3.3.3 Availability of information 3.4 EVALUATION QUESTION 4 ON EXPERTISE 3.5 EVALUATION QUESTION 5 ON COST REDUCTION & IMPLEMENTATION 3.5.1 Delays and disbursement 3.5.2 Transaction costs 3.5.3 Procedures: FA and AA 3.6 EVALUATION QUESTION 6 ON VISIBILITY AND INFLUENCE 3.6.1 Evolution of and compliance with the visibility requirements 3.6.2 Effects of visibility actions on stakeholders awareness 3.6.3 The Commissions involvement through its channelling | 3.7 EVALUATION QUESTION 7 ON COORDINATION &COMPLEMENTARITY; 3.7.1 Consultation with EU MS 3.7.2 Coordination of policy dialogue 3.7.3 Coverage of beneficiaries needs 4. OVERALL ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSIONS 4.1 OVERALL ASSESSMENT 4.2 RATIONALE AND EVOLUTION OF AID DELIVERY THROUGH THE WB AND THE EIB Conclusion 1: Increase in funding as intended Conclusion 2: Strategic approach Conclusion 3: Different use of WB and EIB Conclusion 4: Coordination with EU MS 4.3 ADDED VALUE OF AID DELIVERY THROUGH THE WB AND THE EIB Conclusion 5: Added value of the channelling through the WB and EIB 4.4 EFFECTIVENESS OF AID DELIVERY THROUGH THE WB AND THE EIB Conclusion 6: Promotion of EU policies Conclusion 7: Attainment of results 4.5 IMPLEMENTATION AND FOLLOW-UP OF AID ELIVERY THROUGH THE WB AND THE EIB Conclusion 8: Commissions organisational set-up Conclusion 9: Framework Agreement Conclusion 10: Delays and cost reduction Conclusion 11: Single-donor WB TFs Conclusion 12: Interaction Commission - WB 4.6 VISIBILITY Conclusion 13: Visibility and awareness 4.7 CHANNELLING THROUGH THE EIB-WB-UN 5. RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 STRATEGY AND FRAMEWORK 5.2 ORGANISATIONAL SET-UP AND INTERACTION 5.3 MANAGEMENT TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS 5.4 VISIBILITY | Volume IIa Annex 1 Terms of Reference, Launch Note and approach for an extended desk phase Annex 2 Evaluation Questions, Judgement Criteria, Indicators and sources of Information Annex 3 Description Fiches for the selection of interventions Annex 4 Data Collection Grid for the selection of interventions Annex 5 Study of the EC contribution to the HIPC Initiative Annex 6 Survey questionnaire Annex 7 Survey results Annex 8 Country missions debriefing presentations Annex 9 List of persons met Annex 10 Bibliography |
Author (Corp. Body): Aide à la Décision Economique |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen |
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid |
Year: 2008 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Ref. 1255 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: EU countriesDevelopment bankDevelopment Aidevaluationdevelopment aidEUEuropean Investment BankEuropean Commission financial assistanceWorld Bank |
Subject: Economic aid and technical assistanceAid institutionsEuropean Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu/) |
Title: Study on the feasibility of an ECVET system for apprentices (test phase) |
---|
Title (other): Durchführbarkeitsstudie zum ECVET-System für Auszubildende (Testphase) | Etude sur la faisabilité dun système ECVET pour les apprentis (phase test) |
Author (Corp. Body): European Commission / Directorate General for Education and Culture |
Year: 2007 |
Language: en | de | fr |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: vocational educationevaluationEuropelife-long learningapprenticeship |
Subject: Vocational education and training |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://www.ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: ECVET reflector - Study on the implementation and development of an ECVET system for initial vocational education - Final report and training |
---|
Title (other): ECVET reflector - Studie zur Implementierung und Entwicklung eines Leistungspunkte-Systems für die berufliche Erstausbildung - Schlussbericht | ECVET reflector - Étude sur la mise en oeuvre et le développement dun système ECVET pour la formation professionnelle initiale - Rapport final |
Author (Corp. Body): European Commission / Directorate General for Education and Culture |
Contributer: Forschungsinstitut Betriebliche Bildung | Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung |
Year: 2007 |
Language: en | de | fr |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: vocational educationevaluationEuropelife-long learningapprenticeship |
Subject: Vocational education and training |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://www.ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Evaluation of the EU decentralised agencies in 2009. Final Report Volume IV Evaluation method. December 2009. Evaluation for the European Commission. ABAC Contracts No. 30-CE-0230814/00-05. Specific contract No 003-004 |
---|
Table of Contents 1. Introduction 2. The evaluation process and method 2.1 Preparation phase 2.2 Inception phase 2.3 Data collection and analyses 2.4 Conclusions and recommendations 3. Difficulties encountered and solutions found 3.1 Only activities can be clustered, not agencies 3.2 Performance comparisons are not yet possible 3.3 Benchmarks are difficult to identify 3.4 Proposal for remedies Appendix A List of reviewed documents B1 Agency level documents B2 General documents Appendix B Interviewed organisations (agencies and stakeholders) |
Author (Corp. Body): Euréval |
Contributer: Rambøll Management | Matrix insight | Europäische Kommission |
Year: 2009 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: ABAC Contracts No. 30-CE-0230814/00-05. Specific contract No 003-004 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: evaluationEUEuropean institutiontransparency |
Subject: European Community institutions |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: EX ANTE EVALUATION : A PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR PREPARING PROPOSALS FOR EXPENDITURE PROGRAMMES |
---|
Title (other): ÉVALUATION EX ANTE : GUIDE PRATIQUE POUR L'ÉLABORATION DE PROPOSITIONS DE PROGRAMMES DE DÉPENSES |
Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 2. WHY EX ANTE EVALUATION 2.1 Supporting programme preparation 2.2 Meeting formal requirements 3. WHEN, WHO AND WHAT 3.1 When? 3.2 Who? 3.3 What? 4. HOW TO DO IT? 4.1 Problem analysis and needs assessment 4.2 Objective setting and related indicators 4.3 Alternative delivery mechanisms and risk assessment 4.4 Added value of Community involvement 4.5 Lessons from the past 4.6 Planning future monitoring and evaluation 4.7 Helping to achieve cost-effectiveness ANNEX 1: CHECK-LIST OF EX ANTE EVALUATION ANNEX 2: THE COMMISSION COMMUNICATION ON EVALUATION (SEC(2000)1051) ANNEX 3: EUROPEAN ADDED VALUE (EAV) AND OTHER RELATEDT TERMS |
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Haushalt |
Year: 2001 |
Language: en | fr |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: evaluationEUbudget document |
Subject: European Community budget and financial management |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu.int/) |
Title: Evaluating EU Activities. A practical guide for the Commission services |
---|
Table of Contents Introduction 1 Evaluation in the Commission, its definition and scope 1.1 Definition and role of evaluation 1.1.1. Definition and role of evaluation 1.1.2. Characteristics and delimination of evaluation from other information tools 1.1.3. Evaluation variants 2 Profile, role, tasks and resources on the evaluation function 2.1.Profile and role of the evaluation function in the Commissions's services 2.1.2. Different modes of evaluation function 2.2 Basic tasks of evaluation function 2.2.1 Co-ordination of evaluation activities of the Commission services 2.2.2 Anticipation of the decision-making needs of Commission's services and establishment and implementation of annual plans and multi-annual evaluation programmes 2.2.3 Definition and promotion of quality standards and methods 2.2.4 Promoting the use of evaluation results in the decision-making process 2.3 Skills and resources of the evaluation function 3 DESIGNING AN EVALUATION 3.1 Mandate for an evaluation project 3.2 Evaluation questions 3.3 Drafting Terms of Reference 3.3.1 The purpose and justification of evaluation 3.3.2.Description of the activity to be evaluated 3.3.3 The scope of the evaluation 3.3.4 The main evaluation questions 3.3.5 The approach for data collection and analysis 3.3.6 The work plan, organisation and budget of the evaluation 3.3.7 Selection, exclusion and award criteria (in the case of external evaluator) 3.3.8 The structure of the final report 4 CONDUCTING EVALUATIONS 4.1 Steering Groups 4.1.1 Composition of the Steering Groups 4.1.2. Tasks of the Steering Group 4.2 Carrying out evaluations 4.2.1 Administrative set-up 4.2.2 Implementing the evaluation 4.2.3 Validation of evaluation reports 5 FINAL REPORTING, DISSEMINATION AND USE OF EVALUATION RESULTS 5.1 Reporting 5.2 Dissemination and disclosure of evaluation results 5.3 Channels for diffusing evaluation findings 5.4 Use of evalu |
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Haushalt |
Publisher: Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen |
Year: 2004 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 92-894-7928-0 | KV-59-04-532-EN-C |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: evaluationEuropean CommissionEUfinancial managementmanualbudgetary policy |
Subject: European Community budget and financial management |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu.int/) |
Title: STUDY ON THE USE OF EVALUATION RESULTS IN THE COMMISSION. Final report. Dossier n°1: Synthesis report and Annexes |
---|
Table of Contents Executive Summary Contents Introduction 1 Rationale, scope and questions of this study 1.1 Rationale and aims of the study 1.2 Scope of the study 1.3 Questions to be resolved 2 Methodology 2.1 Overview 2.2 The unit of analysis (the ABB Activity) and the choice for cases 3 Results 3.1 Survey 3.1.1 Implementation of the questionnaire and response 3.1.2 Analysis of statistical results 3.1.3 Other types of uses, not pre-identified by the questionnaire 3.1.4 Specific analysis of free text comments 3.2 Evaluation use as indicated in the Council, Parliament and Commission legislative proposals 3.3 Results from interviews 3.4 Overall case study results 4 Analysis 4.1 The users and the uses of the Commissions evaluations 4.2 Contribution of evaluation to given objectives 4.2.1 Providing input for setting political priorities and choosing between different policy options 4.2.2 Support to the design of interventions 4.2.3 Support to the efficient allocation of resources 4.2.4 Support to implementation of interventions 4.2.5 Support of evaluation to increasing awareness and accountability on achievements 4.2.6 Conclusion 4.3 Factors that foster or discourage the use of evaluations at the level of individual evaluations 4.3.1 Evaluation planning and timing; purpose of the evaluation 4.3.2 Support of the senior management 4.3.3 Quality of the evaluation 4.3.4 Monitoring the follow-up of evaluation recommendations 4.3.5 Involvement of potential users 4.3.6 Human resources 4.3.7 Dissemination of evaluation results 4.3.8 Less important and commonplace factors 4.3.9 Relevance of different factors in the different stages of the evaluation project 4.4 Factors that foster or discourage the use of evaluations at the level of the organisation 4.4.1 Planning / Timing 4.4.2 Human and financial resources 4.4.3 Relationship with stakeholders 4.4.4 Evaluation Function< |
Author (Corp. Body): European Policy Evaluation Consortium EPEC | Technopolis France |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Haushalt |
Year: 2005 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: evaluationEuropean CommissionEUEuropean Policy |
Subject: European Communities and European Union in general |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu.int/) |
Title: STUDY ON THE USE OF EVALUATION RESULTS IN THE COMMISSION. Final report. Dossier n°2: case study reports |
---|
Table of Contents Introduction 1 Unit of analysis (the ABB Activity) and the choice for cases 2 Guidelines for individual case study reports 3 ABB 02 02 Encouraging Entrepreneurship (ENTR) 3.1 Use of evaluation: main points to be learned from this case 3.2 Description of the activity 3.2.1 Overview 3.2.2 MAP 3.2.3 IDA 3.2.4 MGS Pilot scheme 3.2.5 FAS-evaluation 3.3 How evaluations and other information sources structure the activity 3.3.1 Introduction 3.3.2 MAP 3.3.3 IDA II 3.3.4 MGS 3.3.5 Miscellaneous 3.4 How is evaluation used within this activity? 3.4.1 Who are the users and what are the uses of the evaluations within this activity? 3.4.2 Types of use 3.4.3 Which factors have fostered or discouraged the use of the evaluations within this activity? 4 ABB 04 03 Work organisations and working conditions (EMPL) 4.1 Main points to be learned from this case 4.2 Description of the activity 4.3 How evaluations and other information sources intervene in structuring the activity 4.4 How is evaluation used within this activity? 4.4.1 Who are the users and what are the uses of the evaluations within this activity? 4.4.2 Factors that fostered or discouraged the use of the evaluations 5 ABB 05 04 02 Rural development (AGRI) 5.1 Main points to be learned from this case 5.2 Description of the activity 5.3 How evaluations and other information sources intervene in structuring the activity 5.4 How is evaluation used within this activity? 5.4.1 Who are the users and what are the uses of the evaluations within this activity? 5.4.2 To what extent have evaluations within this activity contributed to improvement(s)? 5.4.3 Which factors have fostered or discouraged the use of the evaluations within this activity? 6 ABB 0604 Conventional and renewable energies (TREN) 6.1 Use of evaluation: main points to be learned from this case 6.2 Description of the activity 6.3 How evaluations and othe |
Author (Corp. Body): European Policy Evaluation Consortium EPEC | Technopolis France |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Haushalt |
Year: 2005 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: evaluationEuropean CommissionEUEuropean Policy |
Subject: European Communities and European Union in general |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu.int/) |
Title: Study on the Use of Cost-effectiveness Analysis in ECs Evaluations. Final report |
---|
Table of Contents 1. Objectives of the study Context Objectives and tasks 2. Definitions Cost-effectiveness and efficiency CEA in the case of complex interventions Approaches to costing Approaches to combining effects Cost benefit analysis, another standpoint 3. Review of evaluation reports Selection of 117 potentially interesting reports |
Author (Corp. Body): Centre Européen d'Expertise en Evaluation |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Haushalt |
Year: 2006 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: evaluationEuropean CommissionEUbudgetary policy |
Subject: European Community budget and financial management |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Evaluation in the Commission. Reporting on Results. Annual Evaluation Review 2005. I. Conclusions and findings from evaluations in the Commission |
---|
Table of Contents Executive Summary 1. Introduction 2. Evaluation Highlights 2.1. Heading 1: Sustainable Growth 2.2. Heading 2: Preservation and Management of Natural Resources 2.3. Heading 3: Citizenship, Freedom, Security and Justice 2.4. Heading 4: The European Union as a Global Partner 3. The use of evaluation results in the Commission during 2005 Annex I Overview of the evaluations completed in 2005 Economic and financial affairs Enterprise Competition Employment and Social Affairs Agriculture and Rural Development Energy and Transport Environment Research Information Society Direct Research Fisheries Internal Market Regional Policy Taxation and Customs Union Education and Culture Press and Communication Health and consumer protection Freedom, Security and Justice External Relations Trade External Relations, Development and Relations with African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) States Enlargement Humanitarian Aid Commission's administration Statistics Annex II Reporting on the performance of EU interventions Economic and Financial Affairs Enterprise Competition Agriculture and Rural Development Energy and Transport Environment Research Information Society Direct Research Fisheries Internal Market Regional Policy Taxation and Customs Union Education and Culture Press and communication Freedom, Security and Justice External Relations, Development and Relations with ACP States Trade Enlargement Humanitarian Aid Commission's Administration Statistics Annex III Preparing future activities Economic and Financial Affairs Enterprise Employment and Social Affairs Energy and Transport Environment Research Information Society Internal Market Regional Policy Fisheries Taxation and Customs Union Education and Culture Press and communication Health and cons |
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Haushalt |
Year: 2006 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: evaluationEuropean CommissionEUEuropean Policybudgetary policy |
Subject: European Communities and European Union in generalEuropean Community budget and financial management |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Evaluation in the Commission. Reporting on Results. Annual Evaluation Review 2006. Conclusions and findings from evaluations in the Commission |
---|
Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION 2. EVALUATION HIGHLIGHTS 2.1. Financial Framework Heading 1: Sustainable Growth 2.2. Heading 2: Preservation and Management of Natural Resources 2.3 Heading 3: Citizenship, Freedom, Security and Justice 2.4 Heading 4: The European Union as a Global Partner 3. THE USE OF EVALUATION RESULTS IN THE COMMISSION DURING 2006 ANNEX I SUMMARY LIST OF THE EVALUATIONS COMPLETED IN 2006 01 Economic and Financial Affairs 02 Enterprise and Industry 03 Competition 04 Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities 05 Agriculture and Rural Development 06 Energy and Transport 07 Environment 08 Research (RTD) 09 Information Society and Media 11 Fisheries and Maritime Affairs 12 Internal Market and Services 13 Regional Policy 14 Taxation and Customs Union 15 Education and Culture 16 Communication 17 Health and Consumer Protection 18 Justice, Freedom and Security 19 External Relations 20 Trade 21 Development and Relations with African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) States 22 Enlargement 23 Humanitarian Aid 26 Commission's administration 29 Statistics ANNEX II REPORTING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF EU INTERVENTIONS Personnel and Administration Agriculture and Rural Development External Relations, Development and Relations with ACP States Communication Competition Education and Culture Economic and Financial Affairs Humanitarian Aid Enlargement Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Enterprise and Industry Environment Statistics Fisheries and Maritime Affairs Information Society and Media Justice, Freedom and Security Internal Market and Services Regional Policy Research Health and Consumer Protection Translation Taxation and Customs Union Trade Energy and Transport ANNEX III PREPARING FUTURE ACTIVITIES Agricul |
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Haushalt |
Year: 2007 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: evaluationEuropean CommissionEUEuropean Policybudgetary policy |
Subject: European Communities and European Union in generalEuropean Community budget and financial management |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Meta-study on decentralised agencies : cross-cutting analysis of evaluation findings ; Final Report.September 2008. Evaluation for the European Commission. Contract ABAC-101930 |
---|
Table of Contents Summary 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose of the study 1.2 Background 1.3 Scope of the analysis 1.4 Objective and structure of this report 2 Agencies: a first overall picture 3 Study methods 3.1 Main lines of the study method 3.2 Challenges and potential limitations 4 Agencies: the answered questions 4.1 Relevance 4.1.1 What are the tasks typically entrusted to the agencies? 4.1.2 Who are the final beneficiaries or addressees of the agencies outputs? 4.1.3 What have been the rationales of setting-up decentralised agencies and are the rationales still valid? 4.1.4 To what extent have the needs of the various clients / stakeholders been prioritised and matched? 4.1.5 Answering the overall relevance question 4.2 Coherence 4.2.1 To what extent are the agencies' objectives coherent with those of the EU policy served? 4.2.2 To what extent are the agencies' objectives coherent with those of other EU policies? 4.2.3 To what extent are the agencies' objectives coherent with EU cross-cutting priorities? 4.2.4 To what extent are the tasks of the different agencies coherent with one another? 4.2.5 To what extent are the agencies' activities coherent with other European and international institutions? 4.2.6 Answering the overall coherence question 4.3 Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness 4.3.1 What are the actual and expected results and impacts of the agencies tasks? 4.3.2 What are the added values that the agencies have provided (or are expected to provide) in fulfilling the Community tasks? 4.3.3 What were the costs of achieving the results and impacts of the agencies? 4.3.4 What are the effects of the different financing arrangements in place? 4.3.5 Have the agencies had any impact in term of proximity to and visibility by EU citizens? If so, which one/ones? 4.3.6 Overall answer to the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness question 4.4 Internal efficiency 4.4.1 What are the common characteristics of |
Author (Corp. Body): Euréval Centre for European Evaluation Expertise |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Haushalt |
Year: 2008 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: evaluationEuropean institutiontransparency |
Subject: European Community institutions |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Meta-study on lessons from existing evaluations as an input to the Review of EU spending : Final Report ; January 2008. Evaluation for the European Commission. Contract ABAC-101930 |
---|
Table of Contents Executive summary Introduction Frame, purpose and scope of the study Methodological approach Methodological limitations Structure of this report 1. Synthesis of Evaluators assessments 1.1. Assessment per broad policy area 1.1.1. Competitiveness 1.1.2. Cohesion 1.1.3. Natural resources 1.1.4. Citizenship 1.1.5. Global partnership 1.2. Assessment per evaluation criterion 1.2.1. Relevance 1.2.2. Coherence 1.2.3. European added value 1.2.4. Effectiveness 1.2.5. Sustainability 1.2.6. Efficiency 1.2.7. Unintended impacts 2. Lessons learned 2.1. Designing policies that work 2.1.1. Prioritising objectives 2.1.2. Integrating cross-cutting issues 2.1.3. Formulating achievable strategies 2.1.4. Considering the after-policy period from the outset 2.2. Ensuring subsidiarity 2.2.1. Adding trans-national value 2.2.2. Dealing with critical mass 2.2.3. Changing systems 2.2.4. Securing local relevance 2.3. Spending wisely 2.3.1. Targeting participants and beneficiaries 2.3.2. Avoiding deadweight 2.3.3. Leveraging non-budgetary resources 2.3.4. Making use of financial engineering 2.3.5. Sharing the cost with other levels of government 2.4. Seeking results 2.4.1. Dealing with the pressure to spend 2.4.2. Questioning command-and-control approaches 2.4.3. Managing flexibility 2.4.4. Considering performance incentives 2.4.5. Learning from achievements 3. Challenges, solutions and knowledge transfer 3.1. Inducing structural changes 3.2. Targeting beneficiaries accurately 3.3. Decentralising whilst managing associated risks 3.4. Focusing on results rather than absorption 3.5. Promoting and monitoring leverage Using this report Appendix A Database of available reports A1 - Identifying the reports A2 Structure of the set of reports A3 Impartiality of the available reports A4 - Assessing the potential interest of th |
Author (Corp. Body): Euréval Centre for European Evaluation Expertise |
Contributer: Ramboll Management | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Haushalt |
Year: 2008 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: evaluationEUpromotional programbudget documentbudgetary policy |
Subject: European Community institutionsEuropean Community financial managementEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIB |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Meta-study on lessons from existing evaluations as an input to the Review of EU spending. Final Report. January 2008. Evaluation for the European Commission. Contract ABAC-101930 |
---|
Table of Contents Executive summary Introduction Frame, purpose and scope of the study Methodological approach 1.1. Assessment per broad policy area 1.1.1. Competitiveness 1.1.2. Cohesion 1.1.3. Natural resources 1.1.4. Citizenship 1.1.5. Global partnership 1.2. Assessment per evaluation criterion 1.2.1. Relevance 1.2.2. Coherence 1.2.3. European added value 1.2.4. Effectiveness 1.2.5. Sustainability 1.2.6. Efficiency 1.2.7. Unintended impacts 2. Lessons learned 2.1. Designing policies that work 2.1.1. Prioritising objectives 2.1.2. Integrating cross-cutting issues 2.1.3. Formulating achievable strategies 2.1.4. Considering the after-policy period from the outset 2.2. Ensuring subsidiarity 2.2.1. Adding trans-national value 2.2.2. Dealing with critical mass 2.2.3. Changing systems 2.2.4. Securing local relevance 2.3. Spending wisely 2.3.1. Targeting participants and beneficiaries 2.3.2. Avoiding deadweight 2.3.3. Leveraging non-budgetary resources 2.3.4. Making use of financial engineering 2.3.5. Sharing the cost with other levels of government 2.4. Seeking results 2.4.1. Dealing with the pressure to spend 2.4.2. Questioning command-and-control approaches 2.4.3. Managing flexibility 2.4.4. Considering performance incentives 2.4.5. Learning from achievements 3. Challenges, solutions and knowledge transfer 3.1. Inducing structural changes 3.2. Targeting beneficiaries accurately 3.3. Decentralising whilst managing associated risks 3.4. Focusing on results rather than absorption 3.5. Promoting and monitoring leverage Using this report Appendix A Database of available reports A1 - Identifying the reports A2 - Structure of the set of reports A3 Impartiality of the available reports A4 - Assessing the potential interest of th |
Author (Corp. Body): Euréval Centre for European Evaluation Expertise |
Contributer: Ramboll Management | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Haushalt |
Year: 2008 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: evaluationEUpromotional programbudget documentbudgetary policy |
Subject: European Community institutionsEuropean Community financial managementEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIB |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |