Suche nach Schlagworten '00002630'

5 entries found on 1 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 5

Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),

« Previous
Next »
Title: Family Reunification
Table of Contents
Disclaimer and Explanatory Note
Executive Summary
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 Context
2. METHODOLOGY
2.1 Definitions
3. DEVELOPMENT OF FAMILY REUNIFICATION POLICY SINCE 2002, INCLUDING TRANSPOSITION OF DIRECTIVE 2003/86/EC
4. IMPLEMENTATION OF FAMILY REUNIFICATION POLICY, INCLUDING DIRECTIVE 2003/86/EC
4.1 Sponsor's Spouse (Article 4(1a))
4.1.1 Reunification of third country national with their married third country spouse
4.1.1.1 Polygamous Marriages (Article 4(4))
4.1.1.2 Entry of sponsor and spouse at same time (Article 5(3))
4.1.1.3 Documentary evidence of marriage (Article 5(2))
4.1.1.4 Prevention of marriages of convenience (Article 16(4))
4.1.1.5 Prevention of forced marriages (Article 4(5))
4.1.1.6 Material support requirement (Article 7(1))
4.1.1.7 Integration measures (Article 7(2))
4.1.1.8 Employment (Article 14(2))
4.1.1.9 Autonomous residence permit (Article 15)
4.1.2 Reunification of third country national with their unmarried (including same-sex) third country partner (Article 4(3))
4.1.3 Reunification of EU Member State national with their third country spouse
4.2 Sponsor's Child (Articles 4(1b-d))
4.2.1 Procedural Approach
4.2.2 DNA Testing
4.2.3 Integration Measures (Article 4(1) last paragraph)
4.2.4 Granting of autonomous right of residence (Article 15)
4.3 Other Dependants (Article 4(2a and b))
4.4 Refugees (Articles 9 to 12 inclusive)
4.4.1 Requirement for family relationship to predate entry (Article 9(2))
4.4.2 Permitted dependants (Article 10)
4.4.3 Derogation of material support requirement (Article 12)
4.5 Inter-Member State experiences with implementation of EU legislation
5. SIZE AND COMPOSITION OF FAMILY REUNIFICATION
5.1 Family reunification statistics in the Member States
5.2 Comparative overview of family reunification
Table 1: Overview of family reunification statistics for the reference year 2006
6. CONCLUDING REMARKS
Table 2: Indicative o
Author (Corp. Body): European Migration Network
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Inneres
Year: 2008
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: European Lawfamily reunionmigration
Subject: European Community law in generalAspects of migration
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Directive 2003/86/EC on the right to family reunification
Title (other): Synthesis report. Family reunification. Study on the "Conformity checking of the transposition by member states of 10 EC
directives in the sector of asylum and immigration" done for DG JLS of the European Commission end 2007 (CONTRACT
JLS/B4/2006/03)
Table of Contents
I. LIST OF NATIONAL RAPPORTEURS
II. GENERAL INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY
III. METHODOLOGY OF THE STUDY
IV. SUMMARY DATASHEET AND RECOMMENDATIONS
V. EUROPEAN SYNTHESIS OF THE NATIONAL REPORTS
1. NATIONAL LEGAL BASIS AND COMPETENT AUTHORITIES
1.1. Norms of Transposition
1.2. Situation in federal or assimilated Members States
1.3. Implementing Authorities
2. ANALYSIS OF THE CONTENT OF THE NORMS OF TRANSPOSITION
2.1. General provisions:
2.1.1. Existence of a right to family reunification
2.1.2. Calculated evaluation
2.2. Scope of the right to family reunification
2.2.1. The sponsor
2.2.2. The sponsor’s family
2.2.3. More favourable provisions
2.3. Family members
2.3.1. The spouse
2.3.2. The unmarried partner
2.3.3. Minor children
2.3.4. Adult single children
2.3.5. First degree relatives in the direct ascending line
2.4. Procedure of assessment of the application for family reunification
2.4.1. Existence of a procedure
2.4.2. Supporting documents
2.4.3. Interviews and investigations
2.4.4. Evidence of the demand
2.4.5. Conditions of residence abroad
2.4.6. Duration of instruction
2.4.7. Notification
2.4.8. Best interest of children
2.5. Conditions required to the exercise of family reunification.
2.5.1. Clause of public order, security and public health
2.5.2. Accommodation conditions
2.5.3. Sickness insurance conditions
2.5.4. Resources conditions
2.5.5. Integration criteria
2.5.6. Minimal period of lawful residence
2.5.7. Reception capacities of Member States
2.6 Family reunification of refugees
2.6.1. Exercise of family reunification by refugees
2.6.2. Personal scope
2.6.3. Opposability of National law conditions
2.7. Entry and residence of members of the family
2.7.1. Facilitated entry
2.7.2. Duration of residence
2.7.3. Autonomy of the residence permit
2.7.4. Scope of the rights
2.8 – Penalties and redress
2.8.1 – Gr
Author: Labayle, Henri | Pascouau, Yves
Contributer: Academic Network for Legal Studies on Immigration and Asylum Law in Europe
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Inneres
Year: 2008
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: European Lawfamily reunionmigration
Subject: European Community law in generalAspects of migration
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Directive 2003/86/EC family reunification
Title (other): National summary datasheets & TOCs. Study on the "Conformity checking of the transposition by member states of 10 EC
directives in the sector of asylum and immigration" done for DG JLS of the European Commission end 2007 (CONTRACT
JLS/B4/2006/03)
Table of Contents
VI. NATIONAL SUMMARY DATASHEETS INCLUDING THE TABLE OF CORRESPONDENCE
1. GUIDELINES FOR NATIONAL RAPPORTEURS
2. NATIONAL SUMMARY DATASHEETS INCLUDING THE TABLE OF CORRESPONDENCE BY ALPHABETICAL ORDER OF MEMBER STATES
• AUSTRIA
• BELGIUM
• BULGARIA
• CYPRUS
• CZECH REPUBLIC
• DENMARK
• ESTONIA
• FINLAND
• FRANCE
• GERMANY
• GREECE
• HUNGARY
• IRELAND
• ITALY
• LATVIA
• LITHUANIA
• LUXEMBURG
• MALTA
• THE NETHERLANDS
• POLAND
• PORTUGAL
• ROMANIA
• SLOVAKIA
• SLOVENIA
• SPAIN • SWEDEN
• UNITED KINGDOM
Author (Corp. Body): Academic Network for Legal Studies on Immigration and Asylum Law in Europe
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Inneres
Year: 2008
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: European Lawfamily reunionmigration
Subject: European Community law in generalAspects of migration
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: The effectiveness of return in EU Member States 2017 : Synthesis Report for the EMN Focussed Study
Abstract
The return of illegally-staying third-country nationals is one of the main pillars of the EU’s policy on migration and asylum. However, recent Eurostat data show that return rates at EU level have not improved despite the important increase in the number of rejected asylum applications and in the number of return decisions issued since 2014. In its 2015 EU Action Plan on Return and subsequently in its 2017 Communication on a more effective return policy and the accompanying Recommendation, the Commission emphasised the need for a stronger enforcement of EU rules on return in order to increase the overall effectiveness of the EU’s return policy. The EMN conducted this study with the purpose of investigating good practices and challenges in Member States’ application of EU rules on return and equivalent standards.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
KEY POINTS TO NOTE
MAIN FINDINGS
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Study rationale
1.2 Study context
1.3 Study aims
1.4 Scope of the study
1.5 Structure of the report
2 CONTEXTUAL OVERVIEW OF THE NATIONAL SITUATION CONCERNING THE RETURN OF THIRD-COUNTRY NATIONALS
2.1 National measures implementing the Return Directive or equivalent standards
2.2 Return of irregularly staying third-country nationals as a priority in Member States
3 SYSTEMATIC ISSUANCE OF RETURN DECISIONS
3.1 Authorities involved in the issuance of a return decision
3.2 Issuance of return decisions
3.3 Timing, validity and scope of return decisions
3.4 Guarantees concerning the issuance of the return decision
4 RISK OF ABSCONDING
4.1 Objective circumstances constituting a rebuttable presumption of the existence of a risk of absconding
4.2 Measures aiming to avoid the risk of absconding
4.3 Challenges in determining the existence of a risk of absconding
5 EFFECTIVE ENFORCEMENT OF RETURN DECISIONS
5.1 Sanctions in case of non-compliance with the return decision
5.2 Mutual recognition of return decisions
5.3 Travel documents
5.4 Use of detention in the return procedure
5.5 Use of alternatives to detention in the return procedure
5.6 Challenges and good practices related to detention and alternatives to detention
| 6 PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS AND REMEDIES
6.1 Assessment of the non-refoulement principle in the context of return
6.2 Remedies against return decisions
6.3 Suspensive effect of appeals
6.4 Hearing of the third-country national
6.5 Good practices
7 FAMILY LIFE, CHILDREN, AND STATE OF HEALTH
7.1 Categories of third-country nationals’ vulnerabilities in the context of Return and detention
7.2 Assessment of the Best Interests of the Child on Return Decisions
7.3 State of health of third-country nationals in the return procedure
7.4 Challenges and good practices
8 VOLUNTARY DEPARTURE
8.1 Period for voluntary departure
8.2 Challenges related to voluntary departure
8.3 Good practices related to voluntary departure
9 ENTRY BANS
9.1 Grounds for issuing an entry ban
9.2 Duration of an entry ban
9.3 Registration of entry bans in SIS II
9.4 Issuance of entry bans when illegal stay is detected on exit
9.5 Penalising breach of entry bans
9.6 Effectiveness of entry bans
10 CONCLUSIONS
Author (Corp. Body): European Migration Network
Contributer: Europäische Kommission
Year: 2018
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Migrapol EMN Doc 407
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: policy on asylumright of asylumbest practicethird countriesEUfamily reunionhuman rightsmigration
legal usageremigration
Subject: European Community law in generalHuman rightsMigration
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Family Reunification of Third-Country Nationalsin the EU plus Norway : National Practices ; EMN Synthesis Report for the
EMN Focussed Study 2016
Abstract
The following Synthesis Report presents a comparative overview of the main findings of the 2016 EMN Focussed Study on Family Reunification of Third-Country Nationals (TCNs) in the EU plus Norway: National Report. The Study aims to compare national policies and/ or practices on family reunification between the different EU Member States plus Norway, and to provide up-to-date information on the latest developments in this area of legal migration to Europe since 2011 onwards. The Study further aims to provide comparable data on the scale of family reunification in the EU28 plus Norway at present, as well as overtime (2011-2015 and 2016 where available), supplementing available Eurostat data with national statistics where available.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Executive summary
1 Introduction
2 Overview of the international and EU legislative framework on family reunification
3 Definition of sponsor and family members
4 Requirements for exercising the right to family reunification
5 Submission and examination of the application for family reunification
6 Access to rights following family reunification
7 Conclusions
Annex 1 Statistics on family reunification applications in (Member) States, disaggregated by gender of the sponsor (2011-2016)
Annex 2 Statistics on number of TCNs applying for family reunification in (Member) States, disaggregated by gender of the sponsor and/or family member (2011-2016)
Annex 3 Statistics on family reunification applications in (Member) States, disaggregated by status of the sponsor (2011-2016)
Annex 4Statistics on number of TCNs applying for family reunification in (Member) States, disaggregated by status of the sponsor (2011-2016)
Annex 5 Selected CJEU/ ECtHR as well as national case law rulings on family reunification
Annex 6 References
Author (Corp. Body): European Migration Network
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Migration und Inneres
Year: 2017
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Migrapol EMN [Doc 382]
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: best practicethird countriesEUfamily reunionmigration policylegal usagestatistics
Subject: European Community law in generalHuman rightsMigration
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
« Previous
Next »
Copyright (C) 2003-2019 European Documentation Centres / Update: 09.10.2019