Suche nach Schlagworten '00003065'

2 entries found on 1 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 2

Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),

« Previous
Next »
Title: Risk assessment methodologies for Critical Infrastructure Protection : Part I: A state of the art
Table of Contents
1 Risk Assessment Methodologies for Critical Infrastructures. Setting the scene
1.1 Introduction
1.2 The policy framework in EU and worldwide
1.2.1 The European programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection (EPCIP)
1.2.2 The US Critical Infrastructure Protection (CIP)
1.2.3 National Strategy and Action Plan for Critical Infrastructure Protection in Canada
2 State of the art of Risk Assessment methodologies in EU and worldwide
2.1 Criteria for methodology assessment
2.2 Risk Assessment methodologies: Theoretical Background
2.3 Risk Assessment methodologies in EU and worldwide
2.3.1 Better Infrastructure Risk and Resilience (BIRR)
2.3.2 Protection of Critical Infrastructures - Baseline Protection Concept (BMI)
2.3.3 CARVER2
2.3.4 Critical Infrastructure Modelling Simulation (CIMS)
2.3.5 Critical Infrastructure Protection Decision Support System (CIPDSS)
2.3.6 Critical Infrastructure Protection modelling and Analysis (CIPMA)
2.3.7 CommAspen
2.3.8 COUNTERACT
2.3.9 The DECRIS approach
2.3.10 European Risk Assessment and Contingency Planning Methodologies for Interconnected Energy Networks (EURACOM)
2.3.11 Fast Analysis Infrastructure Tool (FAIT)
2.3.12 Multilayer Infrastructure Network (MIN)
2.3.13 Modular Dynamic Model
2.3.14 Agent-Based Laboratory for Economics (N-ABLE)
2.3.15 Net-Centric Effects-based operations MOdel (NEMO)
2.3.16 Network Security Risk Assessment modelling (NSRAM)
2.3.17 RAMCAP-Plus
2.3.18 Risk and Vulnerability analysis (RVA )
2.3.19 Sandia Risk Assessment Methodology
2.3.20 National Infrastructure Protection Plan Risk Management Framework
2.3.21 Risk Management for Critical Infrastructure Sectors (Canada)
2.4 Gap analysis
References
Summary table of risk assessment methodologies
Author: Giannopoulos, Georgios | Filippini, Roberto | Schimmer, Muriel
Series Title:JRC Technical Notes
Contributer: Institute for the Protection and Security of the Citizen | Commission of the European Communities / Joint Research Centre
Publisher: Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen
Year: 2012
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978-92-79-23839-0 | LB-NA-25286-EN-N | EUR 25286 EN | JRC 70046
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EUendangermentinfrastructurerisk assessmentsecurity
Subject: Peace. Wars. TerrorismNuclear industry. Nuclear safety
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesCanadaUSA
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Study on Civil Security R&D; in major third countries (SER3CO) : Final Report, within the Framework Contract of Security
Studies – ENTR/09/050
Abstract
Policy attention to the security industry increased substantially after the terrorist attacks in the U.S. on September 11th, 2001. With an increased demand for security, the global security market grew a tenfold to around €100 billion in 2011. Many studies expect that growth of the worldwide security market will continue to exceed the growth rate of world GDP.In summer 2012 the European Commission launched an action plan for an innovative and competitive security industry to enhance growth and increase employment in the EU’s security industry. Better understanding of the main competitive strengths and weaknesses of the security industries in the EU and in major other countries should facilitate the development of policy measures to generate a business environment that enables the EU security industry to keep its leading position.One of the main problems in the EU security market identified by the Commission is its fragmentation along national and sometimes even regional boundaries. One of the first steps to address this problem the Commission proposes is to set up an EU-wide certification system for airport screening (detection) equipment and for alarm systems 3. Insight in costs and benefits of harmonized certification schemes will provide essential information for establishing such schemes at the EU level....The study has been executed by a team of specialists from the framework consortium partners ECORYS, DECISION and TNO, in collaboration with associated partners FOI (Sweden), HCSS (the Netherlands) and PLANCONSULT (Austria). The latter were invited for their access to sources and contacts in respective countries.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
1 Scope and objectives of the study
1.1 General Context – Background
1.2 Aims and Objectives of the study
1.3 Approach
1.4 Chapter Outline
2 Comparative overview of the security industry
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Global and European security market overview
2.2.1 General issues related to market size estimates
2.2.2 Security market taxonomy
2.2.3 Global and EU security market estimates
2.3 Overview of third country security markets
2.3.1 USA
2.3.2 Russia
2.3.3 Japan
2.3.4 South Korea
2.3.5 Israel
2.3.6 China
2.3.7 Brazil
2.4 Competitive position of the airport screening and alarm systems industries
2.4.1 Introduction
2.4.2 Overview of the airport screening sector
2.4.3 Overview of the intruder and fire alarms sector
2.5 Summary and conclusions
2.5.1 Competitive position of selected countries
2.5.2 Market attractiveness of selected countries
3 Alarm systems and airport screening equipment: certification and conformity assessment
3.1 Comparative overview of certification schemes around the world
3.1.1 Alarm systems
3.1.2 Airport screening equipment
3.2 EU Certification and conformity assessment – CBA alarm systems
3.2.1 Introduction
3.2.2 Baseline
3.2.3 Quantifying the baseline
3.2.4 Policy options
3.3 EU Certification and conformity assessment – CBA airport screening equipment
3.3.1 Baseline scenario
3.3.2 Quantifying the baseline
3.3.3 Policy options
4 Security R&D; programmes
4.1 Introduction
4.2General context: overall R&D; landscape and security environment
4.2.1 Security environment
4.2.2 National innovation system
4.3 Security R&D;
4.3.1 Expenditures
4.3.2 Main actors
4.3.3 Thematic priorities
4.4 Lessons from the security R&D; in major third countries and recommendations for the EU
Author (Corp. Body): Ecorys
Contributer: DECISION | TNO | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Unternehmen und Industrie
Year: 2013
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: FU98407
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: defense mechanismBrazilChinaserviceEUendangermentindustrial sectorIsrael
Japanair trafficsecuritysecurity policySouth KoreaterrorismenterpriseUnited States of Americacompetition
Subject: European Community treaties and agreementsVarious information networks and systems
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesUSABrazilIsraelChinaJapan
Korea (South)
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
« Previous
Next »
Copyright (C) 2003-2019 European Documentation Centres / Update: 09.10.2019