Suche nach Schlagworten '00003995'
7 entries found on 1 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 7Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),
« Previous
Next »
Title: Bericht der Kommission über europäisches Regieren |
---|
Table of Contents 1 Einführung 2 Die Lehren aus den Reaktionen auf das Weißbuch 2.1 Die Konsultation der Öffentlichkeit 2.2 Die wichtigsten Lehren aus der Konsultation der Öffentlichkeit 2.3 Auf dem Weg zu einem gemeinsamen Verständnis des europäischen Regierens 3 Die Durchführung des Weißbuchs 3.1 Bessere Einbindung 3.1.1 Erster Aktionspunkt: Information und Kommunikation/ transparentere Gestaltung der Arbeitsweise der Union 3.1.2 Zweiter Aktionspunkt: Annäherung an die Bürger durch regionale und lokale Demokratie 3.1.3 Dritter Aktionspunkt: Einbindung der Zivilgesellschaft. Effizientere und offenere Konsultation zur Gestaltung der EG-Politik 3.1.4 Vierter Aktionspunkt: Vernetzung 3.2 Verbesserung der Politik, der Regelungen und der Ergebnisse 3.2.1 Bessere Rechtsetzung 3.2.2 Bessere Durchführung 3.3 Beitrag der EU zum globalen Regieren 3.4 Neuausrichtung der Politik und der Organe 4 Fazit Anhang I - Die Konsultation der Öffentlichkeit Anhang II - Nützliche Websites |
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generalsekretariat |
Publisher: Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen |
Year: 2003 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 92-894-4553-X | KA-47-02-268-DE-C |
Language: de |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: European Commissionlegislationinformation policygovernmenttransparency |
Subject: European Community institutionsEuropean Community law |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu.int/) |
Title: Public access to information in EU databases |
---|
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Union / Europäischer Bürgerbeauftragter |
Publisher: Europäische Union / Europäischer Bürgerbeauftragter |
Year: 2008 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: data bankEuropean Commissioninformation policy |
Subject: European Community publications |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäischer Bürgerbeauftragter (http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu) |
Title: Assessment of the implementation of the EU Drugs Strategy 2005 - 2012 and its Action Plans : Technical report |
---|
Table of Contents Preface List of figures List of boxes List of tables Executive summary Acknowledgements Glossary CHAPTER 1. Introduction 1.1 Scope and objectives 1.2 Data collection and methodologies 1.3 Structure of the report Part 1: The EU Drugs Strategy and its context CHAPTER 2. Background to drugs policy in the EU 2.1 Tackling illicit drug markets 2.2 Drugs policy in the EU 2.3 Drugs policy and the Lisbon Treaty CHAPTER 3. The EU Drugs Strategy 20052012 3.1 Introduction 3.2 History of EU drugs policy 3.3 The EU Drugs Strategy 20052012 3.4 The 20052008 and 20092012 Action Plans 3.5 The process of developing the EU Drugs Strategy 3.6 Substantive points of debate during development of the Strategy 3.7 Internal logic and coherence of the Strategy Part 2 Assessment of the EU Drugs Strategy CHAPTER 4. Demand reduction 4.1 Context 4.2 Drug demand trends, 20052012 4.3 Relevance 4.4 Influence 4.5 Implementation CHAPTER 5. Supply reduction 5.1 Context 5.2 Drug supply trends, 20052012 5.3 Relevance 5.4 Influence 5.5 Implementation CHAPTER 6. Coordination 6.1 Context 6.2 Relevance and influence 6.3 Implementation CHAPTER 7. International cooperation 7.1 Context 7.2 Relevance 7.3 Influence 7.4 Implementation CHAPTER 8. Information, research and evaluation 8.1 Context 8.2 Relevance 8.3 Influence 8.4 Implementation Part 3: Synthesis CHAPTER 9. Conclusions CHAPTER 10. Recommendations REFERENCES Reference List APPENDICIESAppendix A: Interview protocol - key informant interviews Appendix B: Interview protocol EU level in-depth interviews Appendix C: Interview protocol Member State level in-depth interviews Appendix D: Questions in the EEAS Survey Appendix E: Findings from the EEAS survey Appendix F: Online questionnaire Appendix G: Case study objectives for implementation: data summary tables Appendix H: List of documents consulted |
Author: Culley, Deirdre May | Rubin, Jennifer | Skoupy?, Jir?i? ; 170769674 |
Contributer: Rand Europe, Cambridge |
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz |
Year: 2012 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: drug policyEUmedical welfare servicesinformation policycooperation |
Subject: European Community law in generalSocial problems in generalMedical care. Health control |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: MiFID - Conduct of Business, fair, clear and not misleading information : Peer Review Report |
---|
Abstract The European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) has conducted a peer review of how national regulators (national competent authorities or NCAs) supervise MiFID conduct of business rules on providing fair, clear and not misleading information to clients. The peer review focused on NCAs organisation, supervisory approaches, monitoring and complaints handling in relation to information and marketing communications under MiFID. The Report found that there was overall a high degree of compliance amongst NCAs with the good practices identified in these key areas. However, a variety of approaches were observed, leading to different intensity of supervision. A number of areas for improvement were identified. They include: enhanced use of on-site inspections and thematic reviews; a specific focus on conduct of business issues in firms risk assessments; and greater efforts to detect failings by firms in a timely manner. The review was conducted on the basis of information provided by NCAs in a self-assessment questionnaire and complemented by on-site visits to the NCAs of Cyprus, the Czech Republic, Germany, Italy, Portugal, and the United Kingdom.[Author vide Copyright] |
Author (Corp. Body): European Securities and Markets Authority |
Year: 2014 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: ESMA/2014/1485 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: Financial marketinformation policy |
Subject: Public finance. TaxationInvestments. Investment policy |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: European Securities and Markets Authority (http://www.esma.europa.eu/) |
Title: Evaluation of the European Report on Development Initiative (2009 2013) : Final report ; The European Union's Devpol Programme |
---|
Table of Contents Abbreviations and Acronyms Executive Summary 1 Introduction 1.1 The ERD initiative 1.2 Objectives of the evaluation 1.3 Methodological framework 1.3.1 Mapping of comparable initiatives 1.3.2 On-line surveys 1.3.3 Interviews 1.3.4 Document analysis 1.3.5 Analysis of citations and quotations 1.3.6 The evaluation timeframe 1.3.7 Limitations of the evaluation 1.4 Structure of this report 2 Findings 2.1 Introductory findings 2.1.1 Seniority of the ERD initiative 2.1.2 Perceived quality of reports 2.1.3 Reading habits of ERD users 2.1.4 Independence of ERD 2.1.5 The ERD events: facts and figures 2.2 Contribution to enhancing the research -policymaking dialogue 2.2.1 Researchers and policymakers at consultations events 2.2.2 How users assess ERD support to dialogue and policymaking 2.2.3 Most useful reports for policymaking 2.2.4 Contribution to policymaking: success stories 2.2.5 Policymakers and reports: an on-going reflection 2.3 ERD and stakeholders outside the EU development community 2.3.1 Consultations and stakeholders outside the EU development community 2.3.2 Geographic provenance of extra-EU stakeholders 2.3.3 Further elements of the dialogue with extra-EU communities 2.3.4 Fostering of the dialogue: main achievements 2.4 Enhancing awareness; Contribution to the debate 2.4.1 ERD as a visible process vs. ERD as an output 2.4.2 Institutional visibility of ERD 2.4.3 The topics of ERDs 2.4.4 ERD as a support to the work of EU Delegations 2.4.5 ERD as a source of reference | 2.4.6 ERDs and the other major reports on development 2.5 Perceived added value 2.6 Management of the initiative 2.6.1 The co-financing mechanism 2.6.2 The Steering Committee 2.6.3 The Scientific Advisor of the EC 2.6.4 The role of DG EuropeAid 2.7 Implementation modalities 2.7.1 The selection of the contractor 2.7.2 Process for the selection of topics 2.7.3 The production cycle: timeline 2.7.4 The externalisation to a further contractor of the communication/ dissemination tasks 2.7.5 Visibility of the authors 2.7.6 Review mechanisms 2.7.7 The background papers 2.7.8 Additional elements 2.8 Dissemination 2.8.1 The communication and dissemination campaigns scope of action 2.8.2 The communication and dissemination campaign impact 2.8.3 Paper copies of the report 2.8.4 Recurrent criticisms 3 Conclusions 3.1 The multiple dimensions of ERD 3.1.1 Quality of the reports and related issues 3.1.2 The ERD comparative advantage 3.1.3 Researchers and policymakers 3.1.4 Dialogue with stakeholders outside the EU development community 3.1.5 ERD and the global development debate 3.1.6 Enhanced visibility / legitimacy of the EU 3.2 Governance model 3.2.1 The co-financing mechanism 3.2.2 The Steering Committee; the Scientific Advisor 3.2.3 The role of DG EuropeAid 3.3 Implementation of the initiative 3.3.1 The selection of the contractor 3.3.2 The process of selection of the topics 3.3.3 The timeline of the production cycle 3.3.4 The externalisation of the communication process 3.3.5 Background papers and case studies 4 Recommendations Annexes |
Author: Lorenzoni, Marco | del Carmen Bueno Barriga, María |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion EuropeAid | IBF International Consulting | STEM VCR |
Year: 2014 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Letter of Contract N° 2013/332501 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: counselingdecisiondevelopment aiddevelopment aid policyEUresearchinformation policy |
Subject: Development aid. Aid programmes and aid organizationsEuropean Community external relations |
Countries Scheme: Global ResourcesEurope. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Evaluation of information and communication activities towards the EU Member States in the area of EU Enlargement : Final report |
---|
Title (other): Evaluation of information and communication activities towards the EU Member States in the area of EU Enlargement : Final report ; Annexes - Part 1 | Evaluation of information and communication activities towards the EU Member States in the area of EU Enlargement : Final report ; Annexes - Part 2 | Evaluation of information and communication activities conducted by Directorate General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations : Executive Summary |
Abstract The European Commission is committed to providing factual information on past and future enlargements and to cooperating with strategic partners and multipliers to communicate with the public on enlargement. Broad public support is essential in order to sustain the enlargement process. The European Commission has recognised that better communication with the public should be one of the cornerstones of the EUs enlargement policy.This is the Final Report of the evaluation of the European Commission Directorate-General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations (DG NEARs) information and communication activities towards the EU Member States in the area of EU Enlargement.The evaluation led by Coffey International Ltd in 2015 finds that DG NEAR has conducted an impressive number of activities with three main target groups in mind, journalists, informed professionals and interested publics. With no imminent accessions on the agenda, the main conclusion is that DG NEAR needs to segment its communication activities and focus on journalists and informed professionals with a programme of planned on-going communication activities, which lay the foundations for a more targeted campaign-type approach to reach wider publics, if and when a new country joins the European Union.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS ABSTRACT 0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 0.1 Key findings 0.2 Conclusions 0.3 Recommendations 1 OVERVIEW 2 DESCRIPTION OF THE EVALUATION 2.1 Scope and objectives 2.2 Approach 2.3 Data collection 2.4 Analysis, reporting and limitations 3 FINDINGS ON DG NEARS APPROACH 3.1 Objectives 3.2 Target groups 3.3 Budget 3.4 Monitoring and indicators 4 FINDINGS ON SPECIFIC CHANNELS & TOOLS 4.1 Press trips 4.2 Visibility events and trips 4.3 Social media 4.4 Audio-visual 4.5 Print and other materials 5 THE EVALUATION QUESTIONS 5.1 Effectiveness 5.2 Efficiency 5.3 Impact, Added-Value and Sustainability of the Campaigns 5.4 Relevance and quality of the monitoring and performance framework of the campaigns 5.5 Adequacy of the design of the logical framework 6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 6.1 Conclusions 6.2 Recommendations | Annexes - Part 1 LIST OF ACRONYMS 1. ANNEX 1: PRESS TRIP REPORTS 1.1 Overview 1.2 Kosovo 1.3 Albania 1.4 Key findings 2. ANNEX 2: FEEDBACK FROM JOURNALISTS 2.1. Overview 2.2. On-line survey results 2.3. Results from the press monitoring 2.4. Key findings 3. ANNEX 3: VISIBILITY EVENTS A 3.1. Overview - film festivals 3.2. Edinburgh International Film Festival 3.3. Odense International Film Festival 3.4. Key findings on film festivals 4. ANNEX 5: VISIBILITY EVENTS B 4.1. Overview -information talks 4.2. Fighting organised crime in the Western Balkans, Queen Mary University, 5 June 2015 4.3. Public Administration Reform in the Balkans, European Policy Centre, 16 June 2015 4.4. Comparing perspectives on the integration of Roma in Germany & the Western Balkans, 30 June 2015 4.5. Key findings Annexes - Part 2 INTRODUCTION 1. ANNEX 1: FOCUS GROUP REPORT: FRANCE 1.1 Overview 1.2 Results from the French focus groups 1.3 Summary findings 2. ANNEX 2: FOCUS GROUP REPORT: AUSTRIA 2.1. Overview 2.2. Results from the Austrian focus groups 2.3. Summary findings 3. ANNEX 3: FOCUS GROUP REPORT: FINLAND 3.1. Overview 3.2. Results from the Finnish focus groups 3.3. Summary findings 4. ANNEX 4: FOCUS GROUP REPORT: NETHERLANDS 4.1. Overview 4.2. Results from the Dutch focus groups 4.3. Summary findings |
Author (Corp. Body): Coffey International Development Ltd |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Directorate General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations | Deloitte |
Year: 2015 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: ELARG.A2/18/2014 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: AlbaniacitizenEUEU expansionFinlandFranceinformation policyjournalism KosovoAustriapress |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relationsCommunication media |
Countries Scheme: Austria. General ResourcesEurope. General ResourcesFinlandAlbaniaKosovo France |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Strategic Plan 2016 - 2020 : DG Migration and Home Affairs |
---|
Table of Contents PART 1. Strategic vision for 2016-2020 A. Mission statement B. Operating context C. Strategy D. Key performance indicators (KPIs) PART 2. Organisational management A. Human Resource Management B. Financial Management: Internal control and Risk management C. Better Regulation (only for DGs managing regulatory acquis) D. Information management aspects E. External communication activities |
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Migration und Inneres |
Year: 2016 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Ref. Ares(2016)2231546 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Programme und Statuten |
Keyword: citizenEUEuropean Commissionfinancial managementbasic rightinformation policyinternal securitymigration organization modelorganized crimestrategic planningterrorism |
Subject: European Community institutionsEuropean Community law in generalMigration |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
« Previous
Next »