Suche nach Schlagworten '00004035'

6 entries found on 1 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 6

Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),

« Previous
Next »
Title: The Stockholm Programme : a chance to put fundamental rights protection right in the centre of the European Agenda
Author (Corp. Body): Agency for Fundamental Rights
Year: 2009
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EUbasic rightdomestic policysecurity policy
Subject: Human rights
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: http://fra.europa.eu
Title: Review of Twinning in Turkey : Annexes to the final report ; In the context of the framework contract on Evaluation and
Evaluation-Related Services no. BUDG N°06/PO/01/003/101911
Table of Contents
Annex 1 Overview of Twinning in Turkey
1.1 The Twinning instrument
1.2 The key actors involved in Twinning projects
1.3 Turkey’s steps towards EU accession
1.4 Twinning in Turkey
Annex 2 Detailed analysis of Interim Evaluation Reports
2.1 Overall assessment
2.2 Performance ratings per project
2.3 Analysis per criterion and sector
2.4 List of Interim Evaluation Reports
Annex 3 Interview Reports
Annex 4 Sector reports
2.1 Justice and home affairs
2.2 Environment
2.3 Energy
2.4 Transport
2.5 Finance
2.6 Agriculture and Fisheries
2.7 Internal market
Annex 5 Case studies of successful Twinnings
5.1 Overview
5.2 TR0404.04 Development of a training system for border police
5.3TR 0601.01 Support to the set up of an Asylum and Country of Originsystem
5.4 TR0603.05 Strengthening the capacity of the Turkish Grand NationalAssembly
5.5 TR0603.04 Water sector capacity building
5.6 TR0603.03 Improvement of the conditions for Cross Border Electricity Trade
5.7 TR0302.05 Strengthening the audit capacity of the Turkish Court of Accounts
5.8 TR0503.05 Establishment of an IPA Rural Development Agency
5.8 TR0403.01 Customs Modernization Project II
Annex 6 Case studies of less successful Twinnings
6.1 Overview
6.2 TR0501.05 An independent police complaints commission
6.3 TR0601.03 Training of gendarmerie office on European rights standards
6.4 TR0404.03 Enhancement of professionalism of the Turkish Gendarmerie
6.5 TR0403.08 Assistance to the Turkish road transport sector
6.6 TR0202.01 Institutional strengthening of the Energy Market Regulatory Authority
6.7 TR0403.02 Tax administration capacity building
6.8 TR0403.03 Restructuring and strengthening of the food safety and control system
6.9 TR0503.01 Reinforcement of the institutional capacity for establishing a product safety system
Annex 7 Round table meetings
Annex 8 Analysis of success and fail factors
Author: Pot, Ferdinand ; 1055740252 | Blomeyer, Roland | Geveci, Sevil
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung | ECORYS NEI, Rotterdam
Year: 2011
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: BUDG N°06/PO/01/003/101911
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: domestic marketenergyEUjoining of the European Unioncase studyfinancefisherydomestic policy
judiciaryagricultureneighborhood helptransportationTurkeyenvironment
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesTurkey
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Review of Twinning in Turkey : Final report ; In the context of the framework contract on Evaluation and
Evaluation-Related Services no. BUDG N°06/PO/01/003/101911
Abstract
ECORYS has been contracted through the framework contract on Evaluation and Evaluation-related services (BUDG N°06/PO/01/Lot N°3) of DG Budget of the European Commission to prepare a thematic evaluation on the assistance provided by the EC to Turkey through the Twinning instrument.The object of this evaluation report is the Twinning instrument as it has been applied in Turkey in the period 2002 - 2009. In this period, 92 Twinning projects in Turkey were initiated and financed under the Pre-accession assistance and IPA programmes by the European Commission.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
List of Abbreviations
Executive Summary
1 Background of the Evaluation
1.1 Object of the Evaluation
1.2 Objective of the Evaluation
...
1.3 Methodological Framework
...
1.4 Structure of the Report
2 Relevance
2.1 General notes
2.2 Has the underlying strategic rationale and design of Twinning assistance been appropriate for Turkey, at programme/sectoral levels?
2.3 Has Twinning been used in the circumstances foreseen in the Commission’s Twinning Manual?
2.4 Are there certain sectors or Accession Partnership fields in Turkey where Twinning could be an adequate tool but is not used?
2.5 Can synergies be identified between Twinning and other types of EC projects, and/or with projects funded by other donors?
2.6 Is the needs assessment relevant, i.e. are mandatory results precisely defined in the Project Fiches
2.7 Is the interaction between key stakeholders (beneficiary institutions, ECD, DG ELARG) adequate and performing efficiently to ensure successful programming of Twinning?
3 Efficiency
3.1 General notes
3.2 Are inputs/activities being efficiently transferred into the planned outputs?
3.3 Is the selection of twinning (as opposed to any other instrument, i.e.Technical Assistance or Direct Agreements) adequately assessed and justified?
6 Review of Twinning in Turkey: Final Report3.4 Could the same results and impacts be achieved more cost-effectively?
4 Effectiveness
4.1 General notes
4.2 Has the Twinning support under evaluation achieved (or will likely to achieve in the case of ongoing support) the objectives pursued?
4.3 Are quality and quantity of resources allocated by both beneficiary and the Member State/Twinning partner appropriate?
4.4 Is the interaction between key stakeholders adequate and performing effectively to ensure successful implementation of Twinning?
5 Impact
5.1 General notes
...
6. Sustainablity
...
7 Horizontal evaluation questions
...
Author: Pot, Ferdinand ; 1055740252 | Blomeyer, Roland | Geveci, Sevil
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung | ECORYS NEI, Rotterdam
Year: 2011
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: BUDG N°06/PO/01/003/101911
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: domestic marketenergyEUjoining of the European Unioncase studyfinancefisherydomestic policy
judiciaryagricultureneighborhood helptransportationTurkeyenvironment
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesTurkey
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Retrospective evaluation of CARDS programmes in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia : Final Report ; Framework
Contract on evaluation and evaluation-related services: BUDG06/PO/01 ; Lot 3: Provision of External Evaluation Studies
of an Interim and Ex-Post Nature
Abstract
This evaluation report covers CARDS assistance to the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, with a special focus on the Economic Development, Local and Municipal Development and Justice and Home Affairs (JHA) sectors for the period 2000-2006. The interventions concerned the support to Integrated Border Management (IBM), fight against crime, corruption and police reform, education and training, institution building, decentralisation and economic development. They also focused on the overall business climate to foster development of Small and Medium-size Enterprises (SMEs). Democracy and rule of law activities were targeting inter-ethnic relations and civil society.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 EVALUATION QUESTIONS – FINDINGS AND ANSWERS
1.1 RELEVANCE
...
1.2 EFFICIENCY (EQ4, EQ5, EQ6)
...
1.3 EFFECTIVENESS (EQ 7): To what extent have the operational objectives of the programmes/projects been achieved or are in the process of being achieved with respect to planning provisions?
1.4 IMPACT (EQ 8): To what extent have the projects/programmes’ interventions produced political, social, economic or environmental impacts?
1.5 SUSTAINABILITY (EQ 9): Are the results and impacts of the programmes/projects likely to continue after EU funding ends?
1.6 CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES (EQ 10): To what degree do the programmes respect issues of gender, environment, minority inclusion and complementarity with the CARDS regional programme and those of other donors, notably EU member states?
2 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
2.1 Sector-specific conclusions and recommendations
...
2.2 Performance rating
3 ANNEXES
3.1 The evaluation team
3.2 The phases of the evaluation process
3.3 Itinerary of the field mission and list of interviewed persons
3.4 List of projects under evaluated sectors (projects treated during the desk research and field visits are highlighted in yellow)
3.5 List of all CARDS projects 2000–2006 in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
3.6 General Evaluation Questions (EQs)
3.7 Financial analysis of the CARDS project portfolio in the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
3.8 Scope and methodology of the evaluation
3.9 The EC-cooperation with the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
3.10 The EU legislative package of EU programmes for the financial programming period 2007-2013
3.11 General Evaluation Matrix
3.12 Bibliography
List of tables
List of figures
Author: Huba, Martin | Balic, Elma | Sandgren, Claes
Contributer: PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt, Freiburg im Breisgau | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung | European Evaluation Consortium
Year: 2009
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Specific Contract No Budget 06/01/003 | Framework Contract on Evaluation and evaluation-related Services: BUDG06/PO/01
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationeducationdevelopment aiddevelopment planningeducationEUjoining of the European Unionborder region
domestic policyjudiciarycorruptioncriminalityMacedoniaeconomic development (on national level)
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIBEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesRepublic of Macedonia
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Support to the Justice and Home Affairs Acquis : Thematic Evaluation Report of the European Union Phare Programme ;
Phare from Pre-Accession to Accession
Abstract
This report’s key objectives are to evaluate the contribution which the Phare programme has made to the legal alignment, implementation and enforcement of the Justice & Home Affairs acquis in the New Member States and in the two remaining Phare beneficiary candidate countries, Bulgaria and Romania, and to identify lessons learned, draw conclusions and make recommendations relevant to the planning and management of Phare programming in Bulgaria and Romania and to support to other present and future candidates.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS
PREFACE
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
MAIN REPORT
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background
1.2. Context
1.3. Scope of the Report
1.4. Objectives of the Report
1.5. Evaluation questions
1.6. Methodology
1.7. Previous Studies
2. PHARE STRATEGY, IMPLEMENTATION AND RESULTS
2.1. Phare Strategy
2.2. Implementation
2.3. Results
3. REMAINING CHALLENGES
4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4.1. Conclusions on the scope and target of JHA to be supported by Phare
4.2. Conclusions on Phare achievements
4.3. Recommendations
ANNEXES
Annex 1. Terms of Reference
Annex 2. Questionnaire
Annex 3. Questionnaire results’ summary
Annex 4. Phare programmes & projects in database
Annex 5. Phare allocations to database projects
Annex 6. Interim Evaluations covering database projects
Annex 7. Persons interviewed
Author (Corp. Body): ECOTEC Research and Consulting Limited, Birmingham
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung
Year: 2006
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: ZZ/JHA/0533
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: adaptationBulgariadevelopment aidEUjoining of the European Unionfundingpromotional programdomestic policy
judiciarylawRomania
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIBLaw. Jurisprudence. Legal systemsPublic administration. Executive powerAdministration of justice
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesBulgariaRomania
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Thematic Report on Justice and Home Affairs : Mulit-country ; Phare: Assessment of the European Union Phare Programmes
Abstract
This report has been requested by the European Commission from the OMAS Consortium (OMAS). It is based on a detailed analysis of (Monitoring and Assessment) documentation produced by OMAS from 1996 to 2001, in particular, summaries from the Country Assessment Reviews (CARs) in relation to the ten CCs, in the field of Justice and Home Affairs (JHA). Specific account is also taken of the annual assessment report of the (only) Multi-Beneficiary Programme on JHA. The scope of JHA acquis has been radically altered over time, by constitutional amendments to the various Treaties. Topics that previously fell within the ambit of JHA under the Treaty on European Union (prior to the amendments made by the Treaty of Amsterdam), nevertheless continue to be treated as being within the scope of Phare funding for JHA. They are reflected accordingly in the priorities of the Accession Partnership (AP) and the National Programme for the Adoption of the Acquis (NPAA) in the CCs, and can broadly be grouped as (i) border related issues, such as the free movement of persons, visa policy, asylum, immigration; (ii) cross border crime, including drugs smuggling, terrorism, fraud, corruption, organised crime, police and customs co-operation; and (iii) judicial co-operation on both civil and criminal matters.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
GLOSSARY OF ACRONYMS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PREFACE
THE REPORT
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 The Thematic Report exercise
1.2 Objectives of the Justice and Home Affairs Report
1.3 Scale of OMAS activity in the field of Justice and Home Affairs
1.4 Definition and scope of “Justice and Home Affairs”
2. ANALYSIS OF EXPERIENCE GAINED, PROBLEMS IDENTIFIED AND RESULTS DELIVERED
2.1 Methodology for this Report
2.2 Conclusions reached about JHA in OMAS Assessments
2.3 Discussion of issues
3. DEFINITION OF CHALLENGES TO COME IN THE SHORT AND MEDIUM TERM
3.1 Challenges for Phare
3.2 Challenges for JHA
4. RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MEETING THE CHALLENGES
4.1 Methodology
4.2 Substantive recommendations on JHA
4.3 Implementation recommendations for CCs
4.4. General implementation recommendations
4.5. Key issues for future Programming
ANNEXES
ANNEX 1: Table of OMAS Assessments for JHA by year, with ratings of achievement of Programme objectives in the 10 Candidate Countries
ANNEX 2: Breakdown of Assessments by Sector and Value for the 10 Candidate Countries for Justice and Home Affairs
ANNEX 3: Conclusions on Justice and Home Affairs
ANNEX 4: RECOMMENDATIONS FOR JUSTICE AND HOME AFFAIRS
ANNEX 5: Monitoring and Assessment Methodology
Author (Corp. Body): OMAS Consortium
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung
Year: 2001
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: S/ZZ/JHA/01005
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: policy on asylumimmigrationdevelopment aidEUjoining of the European Unionfreedom of movementdomestic policyjudiciary
cooperationCentral EuropeEastern Europepolicelaw reformcrime fighting
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relationsLaw. Jurisprudence. Legal theory
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
« Previous
Next »
Copyright (C) 2003-2019 European Documentation Centres / Update: 09.10.2019