Suche nach Schlagworten '00006063'

6 entries found on 1 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 6

Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),

« Previous
Next »
Title: Mozambique rebuilding an African nation
Title (other): Twenty years of European Union - Mozambique co-operation
Table of Contents
20 years of Mozambique – EU co-operation
A strategy for the future
Case study 1: Improving healthcare in Zambezia Province
The challenges facing Mozambique
Working together for a better future
Case study 2: Project for the rehabilitation of the Rio Save-Muxungué road, Sofala province
Case study 3:The European Union and Elections in Mozambique
Conclusions and lessons learned
Series Title: Development ; 123
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung
Publisher: Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen
Year: 2004
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 92-894-7646-X | NH-60-04-183-EN-C
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: development aidMozambique
Subject: Development aid. Aid programmes and aid organizations
Countries Scheme: Mozambique
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu.int/)
Title: Final report of an audit carried out in Mozambique from 22 April to 03 May 2013 in order to evaluate the control systems
in place governing the production of fishery products intended for export to the European Union and the control of
residues and contaminants in live animals and animal products
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Gesundheit und Verbraucher
Year: 2013
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: DG(SANCO)2013-6766 - MR Final | Ares(2013)3014010
Language: en
Ressource: Länderinformationen | Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: Fish productreportcontrol systemMozambique
Subject: Fishery products. Aquatic fauna. Fishery production
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Independent Evaluation of Budget Support in Mozambique : Final Report ; Volume I
Title (other): Independent Evaluation of Budget Support in Mozambique : Final Report ; Volume II Annexes | Independent Evaluation of
Budget Support in Mozambique : Executive Summary
Abstract
This study has evaluated all of the Budget Support operations undertaken in Mozambique from 2005 to 2012. These operations amount to a resource transfer of US $ 3,354million -an annual average disbursement in excess of US $ 400million, some $16 per annum per head of the Mozambican population, provided by 19 Development Partners. In evaluating these operations, our study has addressed three questions: i. How successful has Budget Support been in providing the means to the Government of Mozambique to implement its national and sectoral strategies? ii. How successful has Budget Support been in facilitating improvements in the efficiency and effectiveness of these national and sectoral strategies? iii. As a consequence, how successful has Budget Support been in attaining successful outcomes and impacts on growth and poverty reduction?[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
FIGURES
TABLES
TEXT BOXES
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES OF THE EVALUATION
1.2. THE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK AND PROCESS
1.3. EVALUATION QUESTIONS
1.4. STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT
2. THE CONTEXT FOR BUDGET SUPPORT IN MOZAMBIQUE: HELP OR HINDRANCE?
2.1. THE EVOLVING SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT OF MOZAMBIQUE
2.2. THE EVOLVING FRAMEWORK OF DEMOCRATIC ACCOUNTABILITY
2.3. FLUCTUATIONS IN THE POLICIES, PRIORITIES AND ATTITUDES OF THE DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS
2.4. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE EVALUATION AND FOR FUTURE BUDGET SUPPORT
3. PROVIDING THE MEANS TO IMPLEMENT POLICY:BUDGET SUPPORT INPUTS AND DIRECT OUTPUTS
3.1. SCALE & PREDICTABILITY OF BUDGET SUPPORT,AND ITS EFFECTS ON AGGREGATE AID FLOWS
3.2. INFLUENCE OF BUDGET SUPPORT ON POLICY DIALOGUE PROCESSES
3.3. CONTRIBUTIONS TO CAPACITY BUILDING
3.4. ADAPTING THE BUDGET SUPPORT DESIGN TO THECHANGING CONTEXT
4. FACILITATING IMPROVEMENTS IN GOVERNMENT POLICIES: INDUCED OUTPUTS OF BUDGET SUPPORT
4.1. MACROECONOMIC MANAGEMENT & REVENUE GENERATION
4.2. THE QUALITY OF PUBLIC FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
4.3. CHANGES IN THE COMPOSITION OF PUBLIC SPENDING
4.4. CHANGES INDUCED IN SECTORAL POLICIES
4.5. GOVERNANCE AND THE FIGHT AGAINST CORRUPTION
5. GROWTH & POVERTY REDUCTION
5.1. GROWTH DATA AND TRENDS BY ECONOMIC SECTORAND PROVINCE
5.2. TRENDS IN CONSUMPTION POVERTY BY PROVINCE
5.3. CONCLUSIONS ON INCOME POVERTY IN MOZAMBIQUE
5.4. TRENDS IN NON-INCOME POVERTY
5.5. CONCLUSIONS ON GROWTH & POVERTY IN MOZAMBIQUE
6. AGRICULTURAL SECTOR OUTCOMES AND THEIR DETERMINANTS
6.1. TRENDS IN AGRICULTURAL PERFORMANCE
142 6.2. REGRESSION ANALYSIS: PRODUCTIVITY AND INPUT USE
6.3. CONCLUSIONS ON DETERMINANTS OF AGRICULTURAL PRODUCTIVITY
7. EDUCATION SECTOR OUTCOMES AND THEIR DETERMINANTS
7.1. OVERVIEW OF ENROLMENT & OTHER KEY DATA
7.2. ANALYSIS OF THE DETERMINANTS OF EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES
7.3. CONCLUSIONS: KEY DETERMINANTS OF EDUCATION OUTCOMES
| 8. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
8.1. OVERALL FINDINGS
8.2. STEP THREE: CONCLUSIONS ON IMPACT OF BUDGET SUPPORT
8.3. RECOMMENDATIONS
BIBLIOGRAPHY
ANNEXES (IN VOLUME 2)
ANNEX 1: SUMMARY OF BUDGET SUPPORT OPERATIONS EVALUATED
ANNEX 2: SUMMARY OF RESPONSES TO EVALUATION QUESTIONS AND CORRESPONDING DATA SOURCES
ANNEX 3: DATA TABLES ON AID, FISCAL FLOWS AND PUBLIC EXPENDITURES
ANNEX 4: BIBLIOGRAPHY
ANNEX 5: PEOPLE MET
Author (Corp. Body): itad
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Ministry of Planning and Development of Mozambique | ADE | COWI
Year: 2014
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract No EVA 2011/Lot 3
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: povertyevaluationdevelopment aidEUfinancial assistanceMozambiqueeconomic growth
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesMozambique
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Synthesis of Budget Support Evaluations : Analysis of the Findings, Conclusions and Recommendations of seven Country
Evaluations of Budget Support
Abstract
1. This Report has been prepared by Fiscus, UK for the Evaluation Unit of Europe Aid. It presents a synthesis of the seven evaluations of General and Sector Budget Support, undertaken in Tunisia, Mali, Zambia, Tanzania, South Africa, Mozambique and Morocco over 2010 -2014. These represent the full set of evaluations completed to date, following the revised methodological approach for evaluation of budget support, adopted by the OECD-DAC Network on development evaluation in 2012. The study builds on preliminary findings reported in 2011 in OECD-DAC’s Evaluation Insights, based on the Tunisia, Mali and Zambia cases.2.The principal goal has been to draw up a summary of the lessons from recent experience with budget support and to develop a corresponding set of recommendations. A central question addressed is how far Budget Support has contributed towards the achievement of targeted development results and how far it has had positive or negative unintended effects. General and Sectoral Budget Support operations have been compared and an analysis has been made of the relative contributions and roles of the different components of Budget Support.3. An additional objective has been to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the “3 step approach” to the evaluation of Budget Support, which has been adopted by the OECD-DAC Network on Development Evaluation and applied in each ofthese cases. The specific tools and evaluation techniques used by each evaluation team have been compared and assessed so as to develop recommendations on possible improvements to evaluation practice. The results of this assessment are presented in a separate volume. (Volume II.)[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Executive summary
Summary of key findings
Lessons learned
Recommendations
1. Introduction: Background, objectives and methodology
1.1 Objectives and scope of synthesis
1.2 The definition of budget support, its modus operandi and the logic of the 3 step approach
1.3 Approach to the synthesis task and its potential limitations
1.4 Structure of the report
2. Budget support to low income countries
2.1 The context for budget support
2.2 The mechanisms for implementation of budget support
2.3 Outcomes achieved: induced outputs, outcomes & impacts
2.4 Conclusions on the experience of budget support in LICS
3. Budget support to middle income countries
3.1 The context for budget support in the MICS
3.2 The mechanisms for implementation of budget support
3.3 Outcomes achieved: induced outputs, outcomes and impacts
3.4 Overall conclusions on budget support in MICS
4. Lessons learned and final recommendations
4.1 Achievements to date and challenges for the future
4.2 Lessons learned on the requirements for effective budget support
4.3 The choice of general or sector support
4.4 Recommendations for the way forward
Bibliography
Annex I: Listing of country evaluations of budget support undertaken to date
Annex II: Overview of the "3-Step" approach
Annex III: Suspensions of budget support due to suspected breaches of underlying principles
Annex IV: Effects of variable/performance tranches: the case of Mozambique
Annex V: Comparing budget support with other modalities: Evidence from Mozambique
Author: Lawson, Andrew
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | ADE | Fiscus
Year: 2014
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationdevelopment aid policyEUfinancial assistanceMaliMoroccoMozambiqueZambia
Southern AfricaTanzaniaTunisia
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesMoroccoTunisiaMozambiqueTanzaniaZambia
South AfricaMali
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of EU Joint Programming Process of Development Cooperation (2011 - 2015 ) : Final Report ; Volume I – Main
Report
Title (other): Evaluation of EU Joint Programming Process of Development Cooperation (2011 - 2015 ) : Final Report ; Volume II –
Annexes | Fiche contradictoire : Evaluation of the EU Joint Programming Process of Development Cooperation (2011 - 2015)
| Evaluation of EU Joint Programming Process of Development Cooperation (2011 - 2015 ) : Executive Summary | Evaluation
du processus de programmation conjointe de la coopération au développement de l’UE (2011 - 2015) : Résumé
Abstract
This evaluation was commissioned by the Evaluation Unit of the European Commission’s Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development. It evaluates the European Union’s (EU) Joint Programming process during the period 2011-2015. It covers all regions and countries of EU development cooperation. It aims at providing the EU and the wider public with an overall independent assessment of the Joint Programming process, and, on this basis, to provide recommendations to improve current and inform the future Joint Programming process.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RÉSUMÉ
1. EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND CONTEXT
1.1 OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION
1.2 JOINT PROGRAMMING BACKGROUND AND PRINCIPLES
2. METHODOLOGY AND DATA SOURCES
2.1 OVERALL APPROACH AND PROCESS
2.2 INTERVENTION LOGIC
2.3 EVALUATION QUESTIONS
2.4 EVALUATION TOOLS
2.5 COUNTRY VISITS
2.6 CHALLENGES AND LIMITATIONS
3. RESPONSES TO THE EQS
3.1 EQ 1: GLOBAL AND COUNTRY-LEVEL CHALLENGES
3.2 EQ 2: JP AND AID FRAGMENTATION
3.3 EQ 3: JP AND AID TRANSPARENCY AND PREDICTABILITY
3.4 EQ 4: PARTNER COUNTRY OWNERSHIP AND LEADERSHIP
3.5 EQ 5: COHERENCE OF EU AND MS PROGRAMMING AND STRATEGIES
3.6 EQ 6: VISIBILITY OF EU DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS DUE TO JP
3.7 EQ 7: EU ORGANISATION TO ENSURE JP EFFICIENCY
3.8 EQ 8: JP AND TRANSACTION COSTS
4. CONCLUSIONS
4.1 OVERALL ASSESSMENT
4.2 CONCLUSIONS
4.3 ACHIEVEMENTS REFLECTED ON THE INTERVENTION LOGIC
5. RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 IMPROVE AND UPDATE THE INTERVENTION LOGIC
5.2 KEEP JP STRATEGIC, FLEXIBLE, AND PRAGMATIC
5.3 CLARIFY AND REINFORCE THE ROLE OF ALL STAKEHOLDERS
List of tables
List of figures
List of Annexes in Volume II
| Volume II
ANNEX A. TERMS OF REFERENCE
ANNEX B. METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH
ANNEX C. DOCUMENTS CONSULTED
ANNEX D. PERSONS INTERVIEWED
ANNEX E. EVALUATION DATA MATRIX
ANNEX F. SURVEY RESULTS
ANNEX G. COUNTRY NOTE BOLIVIA
ANNEX H. COUNTRY NOTE CAMBODIA
ANNEX I. COUNTRY NOTE ETHIOPIA
ANNEX J. COUNTRY NOTE KENYA
ANNEX K. COUNTRY NOTE LAOS
ANNEX L. COUNTRY NOTE MALI
ANNEX M. COUNTRY NOTE MOLDOVA
ANNEX N. COUNTRY NOTE MOROCCO
ANNEX O. COUNTRY NOTE MOZAMBIQUE
ANNEX P. COUNTRY NOTE MYANMAR
ANNEX Q. COUNTRY NOTE PALESTINE
ANNEX R. COUNTRY NOTE RWANDA
ANNEX S. COUNTRY NOTE SENEGAL (FR)
ANNEX T. COUNTRY NOTE ZAMBIA
Author (Corp. Body): Aide a? la De?cision Economique
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Internationale Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung | COWI Consulting Engineers and Planners AS
Year: 2017
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract No EVA 2011/Lot 1 | N° 2015/368247/2
Language: en | fr
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EthiopiaevaluationBoliviadevelopment aiddevelopment aid policyEUfinancial assistanceCambodia
KenyacooperationLaosMaliMoroccoMozambiqueMyanmarPalestinepartnershipRwanda
ZambiaSenegal
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesMoldovaBoliviaMoroccoEthiopia
KenyaMozambiqueRwandaZambiaMaliSenegalPalestinian TerritoryCambodiaLaosMyanmar
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of the EU aid delivery mechanism of delegated cooperation (2007 - 2014) : Final report ; Volume 1 – Main
report
Title (other): Evaluation of the EU aid delivery mechanism of delegated cooperation (2007 - 2014) : Final report ; Volume 2 – Context
to Information and Methodology | Evaluation of the EU aid delivery mechanism of delegated cooperation (2007 - 2014) :
Final report ; Volume 3 – Evaluation matrices | Evaluation of the EU aid delivery mechanism of delegated cooperation
(2007 - 2014) : Final report ; Volume 4 – Country Case Studies, Electronic data | Fiche contradictoire : Evaluation of
the EU aid delivery mechanism of delegated cooperation (2007 - 2014) | Evaluation of the EU aid delivery mechanism of
delegated cooperation (2007 - 2014) : Executive summary | Evaluation du mécanisme de cooperation déléguée de l’UE
(2007 ? 2014) : Résumé exécutif
Abstract
This evaluation studies the European Union (EU) aid delivery mechanism of delegated cooperation (DC) with EU Member States and third donor countries during the period 2007-2014. The main objectives of the evaluation are to provide an overall independent assessment of DC and to formulate recommendations to improve DC in the future.There are two types of delegated cooperation, namely:Delegation Agreements (DAs): funds entrusted by the European Commission to development cooperation entities from EU Member States or other donors; andTransfer Agreements (TAs): funds entrusted to the Commission by EU Member States, other governments, organisations or public donors.This evaluation covers DAs and TAs signed by the Commission during the years 2007-2014, except DAs which are part of financial blending arrangements and DAs funded with resources from the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA), the Instrument contributing to Stability and Peace (IcSP), the Instrument for Stability (IfS) and the Rapid reaction Mechanism. All regions where DAs and TAs have been or are being implemented -except pre-accession countries- are part of the geographical scope of this evaluation. Contribution agreements concluded with international organisations are not covered in this evaluation.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Annexes
List of abbreviations
Executive summary
Résumé exécutif
Resumen ejecutivo
1 Introduction
1.1 Objectives and scope of the evaluation
1.2 Overview of the evaluation process
1.3 Formulation of the Evaluation Questions
1.4 Methodological approach and challenges
1.5 Structure of the report
2 Evolution of the Delegated Cooperation mechanism
2.1 The evolving aid effectiveness context for Delegated Cooperation
2.2 Origins of Delegated Cooperation
2.3 Analysis of Delegated Cooperation Guidance from 2007 onwards
2.4 Evolution of DAs and TAs and the main motives of DC partners
2.5 The relation between DC and new aid approaches and tools
3 Answers to Evaluation Questions
3.1 Transaction costs (EQ1)
3.2 Country ownership and leadership (EQ2)
3.3 Complementarity and added value (EQ3)
3.4 Aid fragmentation (EQ4)
3.5 Strengthened policy and systems alignment (EQ5)
3.6 EU Visibility (EQ6)
3.7 DA/TA ratio (EQ7)
3.8 Assessment of DC proposals (EQ8)
3.9 Quality of DC Cooperation (EQ9)
4 Conclusions and recommendations
4.1 Conclusions
4.2 Recommendations
| Volume 2: Context to Information and Methodology
2.1. Terms of references
2.2. Definitions of specific terms used in this evaluation
2.3. Pillar assessed organisations
2.4. List of documents consulted
2.5 List of persons consulted at headquarters
2.6. Methodological approach case studies
2.7. Additional information on policy and legal framework
2.8. Portfolio analysis
2.9. Dynamics of Delegated Cooperation
2.10. Quality of Evidence for Judgement Criteria
Volume 3
3.1 EQ 1: Transaction costs
3.1.1 Definition and scope of the EQ3.1.2 Rationale of the EQ
3.1.3 Methodological observations and challenges
3.1.4 Improved division of labour (JC 1.1)
3.1.5 More co-financing (JC 1.2)
3.1.6 Larger programmes (JC 1.3)
3.1.7 Use of single management systems (JC 1.4)
3.1.8 Reduction of number of active donors (JC 1.5)
3.1.9 Limited additional transaction costs (JC 1.6)
3.2 EQ 2: Ownership and leadership
3.2.1 Definition and scope
3.2.2 Rationale of the EQ
3.2.3 Methodological observations
3.2.4 Formulation of policies and strategies (JC 2.1)
3.2.5 Implementation & monitoring of policies (JC 2.2 & 2.3)
3.2.6 Reduction of number of active donors (JC 2.4)
3.3 EQ 3: Complementarity and Added Value
3.3.1 Definition and scope of the EQ
3.3.2 Rationale of the EQ
3.3.3 Methodological observations
3.3.4 Improved division of labour (JC 3.1)
3.3.5 Increased use of comparative advantages (JC 3.2)
3.3.6 Improved donor coordination and harmonisation (JC 3.3)
3.4 EQ 4: Aid Fragmentation
3.4.1 Definition and scope of the EQ
3.4.2 Rationale of the EQ
3.4.3 Methodological observations and challenges
3.4.4 Improved division of labour (JC 4.1)
3.4.5 More co-financing (JC 4.2)
3.4.6 Larger programmes (JC 4.3)
3.4.7 Improved donor coordination and harmonisation (JC 4.4)
3.5 EQ 5: Alignment
3.5.1 Definition and scope of the EQ
3.5.2 Rationale of the EQ
3.5.3 Methodological observations
| 3.5.4 Embedded in policies and strategies of partner country (JC 5.1)
3.5.5 Based on national procedures and systems (JC 5.2)
3.6 EQ 6: Visibility
3.6.1 Definition and scope of the EQ
3.6.2 Rationale of the EQ
3.6.3 Methodological observations
3.6.4 Visibility of the EU in Delegation Agreements (JC 6.1)
3.6.5 Visibility of the delegating donors in Transfer Agreements (JC 6.2)
3.7 EQ 7: Balance of DAs and TAs
3.7.1 Definition and scope of the EQ
3.7.2 Rationale of the EQ
3.7.3 Methodological observations
3.7.4 Inventory of TA/DA ratios
3.7.5 Constraints at the level of the EU (JC 7.1)
3.7.6 Constraints at the level of the (potential) TA partners (JC 7.2)
3.7.7 DAs are much more attractive than TAs (JC 7.3)
3.8 EQ 8: Assessment of DC proposals
3.8.1 Definition and scope of the EQ
3.8.2 Rationale of the EQ
3.8.3 Methodological observations
3.8.4 Motivation of EUD to enter into DC agreements (JC 8.1)
3.8.5 Appropriate format of Assessment Fiches (JC 8.2)
3.8.6 Quality of DA Assessment and Action Fiches (JC 8.3)
3.8.7 Quality of TA Assessment Fiches (JC 8.4)
3.9 EQ 9: Quality of cooperation
3.9.1 Definition and scope of the EQ
3.9.2 Rationale of the EQ
3.9.3 Methodological observations
3.9.4 Cooperation on the basis of clear rules and procedures (JC 9.1)
3.9.5 Provision of timely and adequate information (JC 9.2)
3.9.6 Quality of the coordination between the partners (JC 9.3, 9.4 & 9.5)
| Volume 4
4.1 Case study notes Benin
Executive Summary
Résumé exécutif
List of abbreviations
1 Introduction
2 Country context
3 Analysis of output-level indicators
4 Analysis of outcome-level indicators (EQ1-5)
5 Analysis of process and implementation aspects (EQ 5-9)
6 Conclusions
Annex A. List of people interviewed
Annex B. List of documents consulted
4.2 Case study notes Ghana
...
4.3 Case study notes on Mali
...
4.4 Case study notes on Mozambique
...
4.5 Case study notes on Nicaragua
...
Resumen ejecutivo
...
4.6 Case study notes on Palestine
...
4.7 Case study notes on Tanzania
...
4.8 Case study notes on Timor-Leste
...
4.9 Case study notes on Haiti
...
4.10 Case study notes Global Climate Change Alliance (GCCA)
...
4.11 Questionnaire
List of abbreviations
1 Introduction
2 Decision making process
3 Implementation process
4 Direct results (outputs) of Delegated Cooperation
5 Outcomes of Delegated Cooperation
6 Impact of Delegated Cooperation on aid effectiveness
7 The Future of Delegated Cooperation
8 Final remarks
Author (Corp. Body): ECORYS NEI
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Internationale Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung | European Centre for Development Policy Management | Lattanzio | Mokoro | PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt
Year: 2016
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract No EVA 2011 | Specific contract N° 2014/343011
Language: en | spa | fr
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: Beninevaluationdevelopment aiddevelopment aid policyEUfinancial assistanceGhanaHaiti
cooperationMaliMozambiqueNicaraguaPalestineTanzaniaEast-Timor
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIBEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesHaitiNicaraguaMozambiqueTanzania
BeninGhanaMaliPalestinian TerritoryTimor Leste
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
« Previous
Next »
Copyright (C) 2003-2019 European Documentation Centres / Update: 09.10.2019