Suche nach Schlagworten '00007190'

9 entries found on 1 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 9

Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),

« Previous
Next »
Title: Region Level Evaluation Overseas Countries and Territories (OCT) : Final Report ; Volume I: Main Report
Title (other): Region Level Evaluation Overseas Countries and Territories (OCT) : Final Report ; Volume II: Annexes | Evaluation of the
EU Cooperation with OCTs : Fiche Contradictoire ; Ref. Ares(2013)2483870 | Evaluation of the EC cooperation with the
OCT's/PTOM : Final Report | Evaluation of the EU Cooperation with Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTS) : Abstract ;
EvInfo
Abstract
This evaluation covers the strategies of the European Union (EU) for co-operation with the Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTs) and their implementation 1999–2009, including the intended effects under the current programming cycle 2008-2013, in relation to the territorial Single Programming Documents of the 8th, 9th and 10th European Development Fund (EDF), the Partnership Agreement with Greenland and contributions from other co-operation instruments.The main objectives of this evaluation are: To provide the external co-operation Services of the Commission of the European Union (further referred to as “Commission”) and the wider public with an overall independent assessment of the EU’s past and current co-operation relations with the OCTs; To identify key lessons in order to improve the current and future strategies and programmes of the Commission.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 Introduction
1.1 Objectives of the Evaluation
1.2 Context of EU - OCT co-operation
1.2.1 Characteristics of the OCTs
1.2.2 Evolution of the European Commission’s co-operation with the OCTs
1.3 Scope of Evaluation
2 Objectives and Structure of the Report
3 Overall Strategy and Methods for Analyses
4 Cooperation Modalities and Funding
4.1 General
4.2 Framework conditions for regional co-operation and integration
4.3 Efficiency of Disbursement
4.4 The Intervention Logic of Country Strategy and IP of the 8th, 9th and 10th EDF . 304.4.1 Synthesis of the ex-ante Intervention Logic
4.4.2 Summary of the main elements of the Intervention Logic
5 Evaluation Questions and Answers
5.1 Coverage of Evaluation questions
5.2 Evaluation Question 1: Relevance and Internal Coherence of Support
5.3 Evaluation Question 2: General Efficiency of Support
5.4 Evaluation Question 3: Transport, Connectivity and Energy
5.5 Evaluation Question 4: Education and Vocational Training
5.6 Evaluation Question 5: Environment
5.7 Evaluation Question 6: Regional Integration
5.8 Evaluation Question 7: EU Core Values
5.9 Evaluation Question 8: Coherence, Coordination and Added Value
6 Conclusions
6.1 Principal Conclusions
6.2 Complementary Conclusions
6.3 Sector Specific Conclusions
6.4 Overall assessment of the EU support for the OCTs (1999-2009)
7 Recommendations
7.1 General recommendations related to future EU-OCT relations
7.2 General recommendation related to existing aid modalities and co-operation
7.3 Sector specific recommendations
| Volume II
Annex I: Terms of Reference
Annex II: OCT Specific Context
OCT linked with Denmark: Greenland
1. Overview
2. Legal status
3. EC relations with Greenland
OCTs linked with France
1. Overview
2. Legal status
3. EC activities in individual OCTs
OCT linked with the Netherlands
1. Overview
2. Legal Status
3. EC activities in individual OCTs
OTs linked with the UK
1. Overview
2. Legal Status
3. EC activities in individual OTs
Annex III: Intervention Logics for 8th, 9th and 10th EDF
Annex IV: Association of Overseas Countries and Territories of the EU (OCTA)
Annex V: Information Matrix
Evaluation Question 1: Relevance & Internal Coherence of Support
Evaluation Question 2: General Efficiency of Support
Evaluation Question 3: Transport, Connectivity & Energy
Evaluation Question 4: Education & Vocational Training
Evaluation Question 5: Environment
Evaluation Question 6: Regional Integration
Evaluation Question 7: EU Core Values
Evaluation Question 8: Concept of Membership of the Same Family
Annex VI: TAO Questionnaire
Annex VII: Extract of Responses to TAO questionnaire
Annex VIII: Interview Guides
Annex IX: List of Persons Met
Annex X: Bibliography
Annex XI: Inventory of EC Projects/ Programmes
Projects per sector
Regional Projects and Projects Per OCT
Annex XII: Methodology Applied
1. Overall Strategy and Methods for Analyses
2. Field Phase Methodology
Annex XIII: Powerpoint Slides for Presentation at OCTA Forum
Author (Corp. Body): ECO Consult
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Auswärtige Beziehungen | Arbeitsgemeinschaft Entwicklungspolitischer Gutachter | APRI |
Year: 2011
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract No EVA 2007/geo-acp | Ref. Ares(2013)2483870
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: vocational educationevaluationeducational policyenergy policydevelopment aiddevelopment aid policyEUcooperation
program planningregional integrationenvironmental policytransportation policy
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Global ResourcesEurope. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: DG NEAR : Guidelines on linking planning/programming, monitoring and evaluation
Title (other): DG NEAR : Guidelines on linking planning/programming, monitoring and evaluation ; Annexes
Table of Contents
PREFACE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF ACRONYMS
GLOSSARY
1. INTRODUCTION
PART 0: KEY PRINCIPLES AND CONCEPTS, USES AND ACTORS
2. DEFINITIONS
2.1. MONITORING
2.2. EVALUATION
3. PRINCIPLES AND STANDARDS
3.1. MONITORING PRINCIPLES
3.2. EVALUATION PRINCIPLES
5. EVALUATION CRITERIA
6. REASONS AND USES OF M&E;
6.1. WHY MONITOR? WHY EVALUATE?
6.2. USERS
6.3. CONNECTION BETWEEN MONITORING AND EVALUATION M&E;
6.3.1. TWO SEPARATE YET COMPLEMENTARY AREAS OF PRACTICE
6.3.2. WHEN TO USE MONITORING AND WHEN TO PLAN EVALUATIONS
6.3.3. FROM MONITORING TO EVALUATION
6.3.4. FROM EVALUATIONS TO MONITORING
7. MAIN GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES FOR M & E
7.1. MONITORING ACTORS
7.2. EVALUATION ACTORS
PART 1: LINKING PLANNING/PROGRAMMING, MONITORING AND EVALUATION: M&E; THROUGH THE INTERVENTION CYCLE
8. DEFINING THE INTERVENTION LOGIC AS A STARTING POINT
8.1. WHAT IS IT?
8.1.1. IS THERE A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN INTERVENTION LOGIC AND THE LOGICAL FRAMEWORK APPROACH?
8.2. WHY DO WE NEED IT?
8.3. HOW IS IT DEFINED?
8.3.1. PRE-CONDITIONS
8.3.2. STEPS: DEFINING THE INTERVENTION LOGIC'S DIAGRAM (STEPS 1 TO 5), DEVELOPING THE INTERVENTION LOGIC'S NARRATIVE (STEP 6)
8.3.2.1. Step 1: identification of needs (the overall objective(s))
8.3.2.2. Step 2: identification of the specific objectives (the outcomes)
8.3.2.3. Step 3: identification of the outputs
8.3.2.4. Step 4: identification of the activities
8.3.2.5. Step 5: develop the indicators
8.3.2.6. Step 6: develop the narrative
9. DEFINING INDICATORS: SETTING THE BASIS FOR M&E;
9.1. DEFINITION, PURPOSE AND USES
9.1.1. WHAT IS AN INDICATOR?
9.1.2. WHY DO WE NEED INDICATORS? THEIR PURPOSE AND USE DURING PLANNING/PROGRAMMING, MONITORING AND EVALUATION
9.1.2.1. During planning/programming: a way to improve the way interventions are drafted (intervention logic’s design)
9.1.2.2. During monitoring: a way to steer intervention’s implementation (management)
| 13. EVALUATION MANAGEMENT PHASES: PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION, REPORTING, FOLLOW-UP
13.1. WHAT TO EVALUATE AND RESOURCES ALLOCATED
13.1.1. EVALUATION PLANS
13.1.2. APPOINTMENT OF AN EVALUATION MANAGER
13.1.3. FUNDING OF THE EVALUATION
13.2. PREPARATORY PHASE
13.2.1. SETTING UP AN INTER-SERVICE STEERING GROUP/REFERENCE GROUP
13.2.2. EVALUATION ROADMAP
13.2.3. TERMS OF REFERENCE
13.2.3.1. Evaluation questions
13.3. IMPLEMENTATION
13.3.1. INCEPTION PHASE
13.3.1.1. Consultation strategy
13.3.2. DESK PHASE
13.3.1. FIELD PHASE
13.3.1. SYNTHESIS PHASE
13.3.1.1. Final evaluation report
13.3.1.2. Evaluation Staff Working Document
13.4. DISSEMINATION AND FOLLOW-UP
13.4.1. DISSEMINATING THE EVALUATION RESULTS
13.4.2. FOLLOW-UP ACTION PLAN AFTER COMPLETION OF THE EVALUATION
REFERENCES
| 9.1.2.3. During evaluation: a way to demonstrate results to internal and external stakeholders (accountability)
9.2. TYPE, COMPONENTS AND CHARACTERISTICS OF INDICATORS
9.2.1. TYPE OF INDICATORS
9.2.1.1. Quantitative versus qualitative indicators
9.2.1.2. The intervention logic levels: input, output, outcome and impact indicators
9.2.2. HOW TO DEFINE AN INDICATOR? WHAT ARE ITS COMPONENTS?
9.2.3. WHAT ARE THE CHARACTERISTICS OF INDICATORS?
9.2.4. INDICATOR FRAMEWORKS FOR ENI & IPA II
9.2.4.1. ENI
9.2.4.2. IPA II
9.3. WHO SHOULD TAKE PART IN THE PROCESS?
9.4. PRACTICAL STEPS IN DEFINING, VERIFYING,USING INDICATORS FOR REPORTING FOR ACTION PROGRAMMES
9.4.1. STEP 1 – RECONSTRUCT THE INTERVENTION LOGIC
9.4.2. STEP 2 – IDENTIFICATION/SELECTION OF INDICATORS
9.4.3. STEP 3 – IDENTIFY SOURCES AND CALCULATION METHODS
9.4.4. STEP 4 – IDENTIFY BASELINE VALUES AND TIMING
9.4.5. STEP 5 – ESTABLISH TARGETS
9.4.6. STEP 6 – VALIDATE INDICATORS
9.4.7. STEP 7 – DESIGN THE DATA COLLECTION SYSTEMS
PART 2: MONITORING FOR RESULTS
10. TYPES
11. MONITORING MANAGEMENT PHASES: PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION, REPORTING, FOLLOW-UP
11.1. WHAT TO MONITOR AND RESOURCES ALLOCATED
11.1.1. RISK ASSESSMENT
11.1.2. MONITORING PLANS
11.1.1. FUNDING OF THE MONITORING
11.2. IMPLEMENTATION
11.2.1. READINESS ASSESSMENT OF THE INTERNAL MONITORING SYSTEM FOR A GIVEN ACTION
11.2.2. DECIDE WHAT TO MONITOR
11.2.3. ACTUAL (INTERNAL) MONITORING
11.3. INTERNAL MONITORING REPORTING
11.3.1. FOCUS OF REPORTING
11.3.1.1. Implementing partner reporting
11.3.1.1. EC HQs/EUD reporting
11.3.2. INTERNAL MONITORING NOTE/REPORTS VS OTHER INFORMATION SHARING TOO LS
11.1. DISSEMINATION AND FOLLOW-UP
PART 3: EVALUATING FOR RESULTS
12. TYPES
12.1. BY PURPOSE
12.2. BY AGENT
12.3. BY TIMING IN THE INTERVENTION’S CYCLE
12.3.1. BETTER REGULATION REQUIREMENTS ON THE TIMING OF EVALUATIONS
12.4. BY SCOPE
12.1. OTHER
| Annexes
ANNEX 1: KEY ELEMENTS OF THE BETTER REGULATION
ANNEX 2: TEMPLATE OFAN ACTION'S INTERVENTION LOGIC (EN & FR)
ANNEX 3: TEMPLATE OFA BUDGET SUPPORT PROGRAMME INTERVENTION LOGIC (EN & FR)
ANNEX 4: EXAMPLE OF A THEORY OF CHANGERECONSTRUCTION
ANNEX 5: OTHER APPROACH USED IN RECONSTRUCTING A THEORY OF CHANGE: OUTCOME MAPPING
ANNEX 6: INDICATORS PARAMETERS
ANNEX 7: EXAMPLES OFQUESTIONS THAT COULDBE USED TO GENERATE INDICATORS
ANNEX 8: EXAMPLES OF(LEVEL 1) STRATEGIC/DEVELOPMENT PROGRESSINDICATORS RELEVANT FOR DG NEAR (ENI & IPA II)
ANNEX 9: EXAMPLES OF(LEVEL 2) OUTPUT ANDOUTCOME INDICATORS RELEVANT FOR DG DG NEAR (ENI & IPA II)
ANNEX 10: EXAMPLES OF (LEVEL 3) INTERVENTION/ORGANISATIONAL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RELEVANT FOR DG NEAR(ENI & IPA II)
ANNEX 11: CHECKLIST FOR ON THE SPOT CHECK MONITORING-SERVICES
ANNEX 12: CHECKLIST FOR ON THE SPOT CHECK MONITORING -SUPPLY DIS
ANNEX 13: CHECKLIST FOR ON THE SPOT CHECK MONITORING -WORKS
ANNEX 14: CHECKLIST FOR OVERALL ON THE SPOT CHECK MONITORING-GRANT SCHEMES* (DECENTRALISED)
ANNEX 15: CHECKLIST FOR ON THE SPOT CHECK MONITORING -GRANTS (DECONCENTRATED)
ANNEX 16: MONITORING BY NATIONAL AUTHORITIES IN IPA II
1. ACTION MONITORING
2. DATA PRODUCTION AND MONITORING OF INDICATORS
3. SECTOR STRATEGIC MONITORING
4. SYSTEM MONITORING
ANNEX 17: EVALUATIONTASK-BUDGET TEMPLATE
ANNEX 18: EVALUATIONAPPROACHES AND METHODS
1. COUNTERFACTUAL APPROACH TO IMPACT EVALUATION
2. THEORY-BASED EVALUATION
3. REALIST EVALUATION
4. PARTICIPATORY EVALUATION
5. POSITIVE APPROACHES
ANNEX 19: EVALUATION QUESTIONS, TYPES OF EVALUATIONS IN DG NEAR PRACTICE AND POSSIBLE APPROACHES TO EVALUATION
ANNEX 20: QUALITY ASSESSMENT GRID FOR A PROJECT / PROGRAMME EVALUATION REPORT AND GUIDELINES FOR ITS FULFILMENT
ANNEX 21: EVALUATION RECOMMENDATIONS FOLLOW-UP TEMPLATE
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Directorate General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations
Year: 2016
Language: en
Ressource: Anleitungen, Checklisten, Leitfäden, Lehrmaterial
Keyword: financial aidevaluationEUjoining of the European UnionEU expansionprogram planningdirectivemonitoring
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: IPA II Monitoring, Reporting and Performance Framework : Final report
Title (other): IAP II – Suivi, Rapports and Cadre de Performance (SRCP) : Résumé excutif final
Abstract
The assignment for IPA II Monitoring, Reporting and Performance Framework (MRPF) has lasted over roughly one year, from December 2014 to December 2015, and its three successive Specific Objectives or components have been the following:Specific Objective 1: Help design and streamline the monitoring and reporting system (hereafter MRPF) in the context of IPA II assistance by assessing the state of play and legal requirements and by providing recommendations in a view of improving the relevance, quality and consistency of the monitoring and reporting framework.Specific Objective 2: Assess the limits of the evaluability and the scope of the Mid-Term Review of the IPA and ENI (instruments) to be carried out in 2017, having regard to the regulatory requirements, the institutional setting of the new financial instrument(s) and the monitoring of the degree of realisation of activities and results by that time and the monitoring and reporting system put in place.Specific Objective 3: Provide recommendations on how to ensure sufficient visibility of the IPA II performance, including ways to enhance transparency and improve compliance with the International Aid Transparency Standards, as well as ways to strengthen the relevance, quality and impact of the related information and communication activities[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Acronyms and Abbreviations
Executive Summary
INTRODUCTION
1. MONITORING, REPORTING AND PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK (MRPF)
1.1 Key Findings1.2 Assessment
1.3 Recommendations
1.3.1 General Recommendations
1.3.2 Specific recommendations on the MRPF architecture in each one of the IPA II beneficiaries
1.3.3 Multi-beneficiary Dimension of IPA II MRPF and Potential Role of ReSPA
2. EVALUABILITY OF IPA II MTR 2017
2.1 Key Findings & Conclusions
2.1.1 General Outline
2.1.2 How the specific requirements of the Regulations should be approached?
2.1.3 How the evaluation criteria should be approached/ used?
2.1.4 Are the indicators included in the Regulations, Programme Statement (PS) and Indicative (country & multi-country) Strategy Papers aligned and thus appropriate and sufficient for the implementation of the MTR 2017?
2.1.5 Which are the sources of information to be used for the MTR 2017 and how the required info/data should be collected and processed? Are intermediate evaluations (thematic, other) needed to be implemented, in order to contribute to specific subjects where direct info/data do not exist?
2.1.6 Which are the critical parameters for the data collection in view of the available time and the limited progress in the implementation of the IPA II actions?
2.1.7 How the required public consultation (general -for the wider public and specific -for the IPA II stakeholders) should be organized & implemented?
2.2 Assessment of the Evaluability of the MTR 2017
2.3 Recommendations
3. VISIBILITY OF IPA II PERFORMANCE
Introduction
3.1 Key Findings and Conclusions
3.1.1 Visibility
3.1.2 Transparency
3.2 Assessment
3.3 Recommendations
3.3.1 Communication Strategy of DG NEAR
3.3.2 Recommendations
4. PROPOSAL FOR IMMEDIATE FOLLOW-UP ACTION
ANNEXES
Annex 1 – Comprehensive Fieldwork Findings in IPA Beneficiaries
A 1.1 Recapitulated Fieldwork Findings from Albania
A 1.2 Recapitulated Fieldwork Findings from Bosnia & Herzegovina
| A 1.3 Recapitulated Fieldwork Findings from the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
A 1.5 Recapitulated Fieldwork Findings from Serbia
A 1.6 Recapitulated Fieldwork Findings from Montenegro
A 1.7 Recapitulated Fieldwork Findings from Kosovo
Annex 2 – Existing processes of reporting on implementation progress in IPA Beneficiaries
Annex 3 – IPA II MRPF Processes
Annex 4 – Main Findings of CS E-survey
Annex 5 – Terms of Reference
Author (Corp. Body): B & S Europe | Proman
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Directorate General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations
Year: 2016
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Specific Contract N° 2014/351 - 964
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: AlbaniaevaluationBosnia and Herzegovinadevelopment aidEUjoining of the European UnionKosovoMacedonia
Montenegroprogram planningSerbiamonitoring
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Operating in situations of conflict and fragility : An EU staff handbook
Table of Contents
FOREWORD
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
PART I: CONCEPTS, POLICIES AND THE EU APPROACH
Introduction: The EU’s engagement in situations of conflict and fragility
1 Concepts
1.1 What is a situation of conflict and fragility?
1.2 What is conflict sensitivity, why does it matter to the EU and how do I need to engage differently?
2 The EU approach to conflict and fragility
2.1 What lessons have we learned?
2.2 What is the EU approach?
2.3 What are the relevant policies?
2.4 What EU financial instruments are available?
2.5 What EU tools are available?
PART II: PRACTICAL GUIDANCE NOTES
Note No 1 Conflict sensitivity and analysis for effective EU external action
Note No 2 Programming flexibly for situations of conflict and fragility
Note No 3 Promoting democratic governance and human rights in situations of conflict and fragility
Note No 4 Promoting resilience in situations of conflict and fragility
Note No 5 Identifying and implementing EU modalities and instruments in situations of conflict and fragility
Note No 6 Using flexible procedures in situations of conflict and fragility
Note No 7 Engaging with national counterparts in situations of conflict and fragility
Note No 8 Working with international actors in situations of conflict and fragility
Note No 9 Promoting inclusive and sustainable growth in situations of conflict and fragility
ANNEXES
1 Glossary
2 EU conflict sensitivity resource pack
3 Bibliography
4 EU responsibilities for fragility and conflict
5 Online knowledge sharing and collaboration platform: Capacity4dev.eu
6 Useful distinctions of situations of conflict and fragility
7 Recipients of EU development assistance considered by the OECD to be in situations of fragility (2009–12)
List of boxes
List of graphs
List of tables
Series Title:Tools and Methods Series : Reference Document ; 17
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Internationale Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Veröffentlichungen
Year: 2015
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978-92-79-48147-5 | MN-BB-15-001-EN-N | 1977-6411
Language: en
Ressource: Anleitungen, Checklisten, Leitfäden, Lehrmaterial
Keyword: foreign policydevelopment aid policyEUfinancial assistancegovernanceconflict managementcrisis management (psych.)human rights
program planning
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIBEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Overseas Countries and Territories: Environmental Profiles ; Final report ; Part 1 - Main report
Title (other): Overseas Countries and Territories : Environmental Profiles ; Final report ; Part 2 - Detailed report ; Section A -
Caribbean Region | Overseas Countries and Territories : Environmental Profiles ; Final report ; Part 2 - Detailed report
; Section B - Indian Ocean Region | Overseas Countries and Territories : Environmental Profiles ; Final report ; Part 2
- Detailed report ; Section C - North Atlantic Region | Overseas Countries and Territories : Environmental Profiles ;
Final report ; Part 2 - Detailed report ; Section D - Pacific Region | Overseas Countries and Territories :
Environmental Profiles ; Final report ; Part 2 - Detailed report ; Section E - South Atlantic Region
Abstract
This report contains environmental profiles for the 25 Overseas countries and territories (OCTs) associated with the European Union. These environmental profiles are set in a socio-economic developmental perspective so that the findings can be used to assist in programming projects in the framework of the EU 2014-2020 cooperation programming. A specific regime is applied to OCTs as specified in the Overseas Association Decision adopted on November 2013. Greenland is also in a special position in so far as it receives budget support from the General budget. The OCTs, the EU Member States to which they are linked and the European Commission hold an annual forum to discuss progress.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Abbreviations and acronyms
Table of contents
Summary
1 Introduction
1.1 Purpose of the project
1.2 What are the overseas countries and territories?
1.3 Scope of the term environment
1.4 Vulnerability
1.5 Methodology
1.6 Structure of this report
1.7 Relationship between EU, MS and OCTs
1.7.1 New OAD
1.7.2 Relationship with Member States
2 OCTs basic information and statistics
2.1 Contrasting territories, distinguishing characteristics
2.2 Economies
3 Biogeography, endemism and importance for global biodiversity
4 Status of the environment
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Evolution on environmental management
4.3 Priorities indicated by OCTs on environmental components
5 Environmental governance
5.1 Institutional framework
5.2 Policies, strategies, Plans
5.3 Legal framework
5.4 Civil society: role of consultation, NGOs, Aarhus
6 Cooperation
7 Recommendations
8 References
| Section A
Abbreviations and acronyms
1 Introduction
2 Description of the region
3 Biogeography, endemism and importance for global biodiversity
4 Issues and threats
5 Review of environmental governance
5.1 Environmental management administration
5.2 Policies, strategies, plans, awareness and monitoring
5.3 Legal Framework
6 Cooperation
6.1 Relevant regional organisations and programmes
6.2 Relevant regional initiatives and projects
7 Recommendations for cooperation in the environment between the European Union and Caribbean OCTs
8 References
Annex A : Anguilla
Annex B : Aruba
Annex C : Bonaire
Annex D : The Virgin Islands
Annex E : Cayman Islands
Annex F : Curaçao
Annex G : Montserrat
Annex H : Saba
Annex I : Saint-Barthélemy
Annex J : Sint Eustatius
Annex K : Sint Maarten
Annex L : Turks and Caicos Islands
Section B
Abbreviations and acronyms
1 Introduction
2 Description of the region
3 Biogeography, endemism and importance for global biodiversity
4 Issues and threats
5 Environmental governance
5.1 Institutions
5.2 Policies, strategies, plans
5.3 Legal framework
6 Cooperation
6.1 Relevant regional organisations and programmes
6.2 Relevant regional initiatives and projects
7 Recommendations for cooperation in the environment between the European Union and Indian Ocean OCTs
8 References
Annex A : British Indian Ocean Territory
Annex B : French Southern and Antarctic Territories
| Section C
Abbreviations and acronyms
1 Introduction
2 Description of the region
2.1 Key facts and statistics
3 Biogeography, endemism and importance for global biodiversity
4 Issues and threats
4.1 Introduction
5 Environmental governance
5.1 Institutions
5.2 Policies, strategies, plans, awareness and monitoring
5.3 Legal framework
6 Cooperation
6.1 Relevant regional organisations and programmes
6.2 Relevant regional initiatives and projects
7 Recommendations for cooperation in the environment between the European Union and Indian Ocean OCTs
8 References
Annex A : Bermuda
Annex B : Greenland
Annex C: Saint Pierre and Miquelon
(en)Section D
Abbreviations and acronyms
Environmental profile of Pacific OCTs - Regional
1 Introduction
2 Description of the region
3 Key facts and statistics
4 Biogeography, endemism, importance for global biodiversity
5 State of the environment
5.1 Built environment
5.2 Biodiversity
5.3 Natural hazards
6 Review of Environmental governance
6.1 Institutions
6.2 Policies, strategies, plans, awareness and monitoring
6.3 Legal Framework
7 Cooperation
7.1 Relevant regional organisations and programmes
7.2 Relevant regional initiatives and projects
7.2.1 EU projects and programmes
7.2.2 Pacific Community regional projects
7.2.3 France
8 Recommendations
9 References
Annex A : French Polynesia
Annex B : New Caledonia
Annex C : Pitcairn
Annex D : Wallis and Futuna
| Section E
Abbreviations and acronyms
1 Introduction
2 Description of the region
3 Key facts and statistics
4 Biogeography, endemism and importance for global biodiversity
5 Issues and threats
6 Review of environmental governance
6.1 Institutions
6.2 Policies, strategies, plans, awareness and monitoring
6.3 Legal Framework
7 Cooperation
7.1 Relevant regional organisations and programmes
7.2 Relevant regional initiatives and projects
8 Recommendations for cooperation in the environment between the European Union and South Atlantic OCTs
9 References
Annex A : British Antarctic Territory
Annex B : Falkland Islands
Annex C : South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands
Annex D : Saint Helena, Ascension Island and Tristan da Cunha
Author (Corp. Body): Safège Consortium
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Internationale Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung | Prospect C & S | OCTA | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid
Year: 2015
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: EuropeAid/127054/C/SER/multi | Request n° 2013/325768
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: Bermudabiodiversitydevelopment aidEUIndian OceanCaribbean RegioncooperationPacific Rim
program planningregional developmentsocial economicsAntarcticaenvironmental managementenvironmental policyenvironmental protection
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIBEuropean Community external relationsConservation of resources
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesCaribbean. General ResourcesBermuda
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Instructions for the programming of the 11th European Development Fund (EDF) and the Development Cooperation Insturment
(DCI) - 2014 - 2020
Abstract
This document contains the detailed instructions and guidance for the EEAS, DEVCO services and EU Delegations for the programming of the EU's bilateral development cooperation with partner countries and regions in Africa, the Caribbean and the Pacific (ACP) under the 11th European Development Fund (EDF), and in Asia, the Middle East and Latin America under the Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) and in the context of the EU’s Multiannual Financial Framework (MFF) for the period 2014-2020. The instructions set out how the programming process is organized and how the overarching policies and principles which will govern the programming for that period (in particular the proposals for a new EU development policy, as laid down in the Agenda for Change Communication), are to be translated into the programming process and documents.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
1. Introduction and Context
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Context
2. New Programming Framework
2.1 Institutional set up
2.2 Programming process
2.3 Guiding principles
3. First phase of the programming process
3.1 The national/regional development plan and the overall lines of the EU response
3.2 Joint Programming
3.3 Country or Regional Strategy Papers (CSP/RSP)
3.4 The specific case of a Joint Framework Document (JFD) as a non-programming document
4. Second phase of the programming process: Multi-annual Indicative Programme
LIST OF ANNEXES
1. Flow chart of the overview of the programming process
2. Guiding principles for sector concentration and the choice of sectors
3. Template for Analysis of the National Development Plan
4. Template for Country Strategy Paper
5. Template for Multi-annual Indicative Programme
Author (Corp. Body): Europäischer Auswärtiger Dienst | Europäische Kommission / EuropeAid
Year: 2012
Language: en
Ressource: Anleitungen, Checklisten, Leitfäden, Lehrmaterial
Keyword: African-Caribbean-Pacific countriesAsiadevelopment aid policyEUcooperationLatin AmericaNear Eastprogram planning
Subject: Development aid. Aid programmes and aid organizations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesCaribbean. General ResourcesAfrica. General ResourcesAsia and Middle East. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: External Evaluation of the European Union's Cooperation with the West Africa Region (2008-2016) : Final Report ; Volume
I - Main Report
Title (other): Evaluation externe de la coopération de l’Union européenne avec la région Afrique de l’Ouest (2008-2016) : Rapport
final ; Volume I -Rapport principal | Evaluation externe de la coopération de l’Union européenne avec la région
Afrique de l’Ouest (2008-2016) : Rapport final ; Volume II –Annexes | Evaluation externe de la coopération de
l’Union européenne avec la région Afrique de l’Ouest (2008-2016) : Rapport final ; Volume III –Annexes | External
Evaluation of the European Union's Cooperation with the West Africa Region (2008-2016) : Summary | Evaluation externe de
la coopération de l’Union européenne avec la région Afrique de l’Ouest (2008-2016) : Résumé | Evaluation externe
de la coopération de l'UE avec l'Afrique de l'ouest (2008-2016) -"Fiche contradictoire" – Principales recommandations
Abstract
This report presents the external evaluation of the European Union's (EU) strategy of cooperation with the West Africa region and of its implementation over the period 2008-2016. Its main objectives are: i) to provide both the EU institutions and a broader audience with an independent and global analysis of EU’s past and present cooperation relations with West Africa;and ii) to identify the key lessons and make recommendations with a view to improving current and future strategies, programmes and activities of the EU. These recommendations relate to the time frame up to 2020, which is the end of the period covered by the Regional Indicative Programme (RIP) of the 11th European Development Fund (EDF). They also provide food for thought on regional cooperation strategy post-2020.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
MAP OF THE WEST AFRICA REGION
SUMMARY
RÉSUMÉ
1.INTRODUCTION
1.1 PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION
1.2 EVALUATION METHODOLOGY AND PROCESS
1.3 ORGANISATION OF THE FINAL REPORT
2. THE CONTEXT OF THE WEST AFRICA REGION2.2 REGIONAL INTEGRATION POLICIES AND STRATEGIES3. KEY FACTORS IN EUREGIONAL COOPERATION IN WEST AFRICA
3.1 DEVELOPMENT OF COOPERATION STRATEGIES
4. ANSWERS TO THE EVALUATION QUESTIONS
4.1 EQ1 – APPROPRIATENESS OF THE STRATEGY FOR THE CONTEXT AND ITS SUBSEQUENT CHANGES
4.2 EQ2 – PEACE, SECURITY AND REGIONAL STABILITY
4.3 EQ3 – REGIONAL ECONOMIC INTEGRATION4.5 EQ5 – FOOD AND NUTRITION SECURITY
4.6 EQ6 – SUSTAINABLE NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
4.7 EQ7 – INTERVENTION MEANS AND APPROACHES5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 CONCLUSIONS
5.2 RECOMMENDATIONS
List of tables
List of figures
List of annexes
| LIST OF ANNEXES IN VOLUME II
ANNEX 1: EVALUATION MATRIX
ANNEX 2: EVIDENCE MATRIX
LIST OF ANNEXES IN VOLUME III
ANNEX 3: TERMS OF REFERENCE
ANNEX 4: EVALUATION METHODOLOGY
ANNEX 5: PEOPLE INTERVIEWED
ANNEX 6: DOCUMENTATION CONSULTED
ANNEX 7: REGIONAL CONTEXT
ANNEX 8: OVERALL AND SECTOR-SPECIFIC COOPERATION STRATEGIES
ANNEX 9: INVENTORY OF REGIONAL COOPERATION
ANNEX 10 :CASE STUDIES
ANNEX 11: DEBRIEFING MEETINGS
Author (Corp. Body): Institut de Recherches d'Applications des Me?thodes de De?veloppement
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Internationale Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung | Aide a? la De?cision Economique
Year: 2018
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract No. COM 2015/Lot 1 Evaluation No. 2016/381014
Language: en | fr
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: best practiceevaluationenergydevelopment aid policyEUguarantee of peacecooperationsustainable development
foodprogram planningregional integrationregional promotion of economytransportation policyWest Africa
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesWestern Africa. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Independent Evaluation of the European Union's Cooperation with Afghanistan (2007-2016) : Final Report – Volume 1
Title (other): Independent Evaluation of the European Union's Cooperation with Afghanistan (2007-2016) : Final Report – Volume 2
Evaluation Matrix | Fiche contradictoire : Evaluation of EU's Cooperation with Afghanistan (2007 –2016)
Abstract
The current document is the Final Report which presents the findings for the Evaluation of European Union’s Cooperation with Afghanistan, as required by the Terms of Reference (ToR). The ToR outline two main purposes for the Evaluation of the European Union (EU)’s cooperation with Afghanistan:to provide the relevant external cooperation services of the Commission, and the wider public, with an overall independent assessment of the Commission’s past and current cooperation, andto identify key lessons in order to improve the current and inform future choices cooperation strategy and delivery.The rationale for this evaluation is to provide the necessary evidence to inform decision-making processes in a series of events which will take place in the next two of years, including the 2018-2020 mid-term review of the Multi-Annual Indicative Programme (MIP).[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1Key methodological steps
2 AFGHAN CONTEXT
2.1 Aid funds
3 EU SUPPORT TO AFGHANISTAN 2007-2016
3.1 Overview of the EU funds 2007-2016
4 RESPONSES TO THE EVALUATION QUESTIONS
4.1 EQ1 Relevance and responsiveness
4.2 EQ2 Results
4.3 EQ3 Aid management
4.4 EQ4 Aid modalities
4.5 EQ5 Gender
4.6 EQ6 Coherence, coordination and complementarity
4.7 EQ7 Do no harm
5 CONCLUSIONS
6 RECOMMENDATIONS
| Volume 2
EQ1. HAS THE EU’S ASSISTANCE TO AFGHANISTAN CORRESPONDED TO THE NEED IN AFGHANISTAN IN LIGHTOF THE EVOLVING COUNTRY CONTEXT,AND THE EU’S OWN POLITICAL PRIORITIES?
EQ2. TO WHAT EXTENT HAS THE EU SUPPORT CONTRIBUTED TO IMPROVING INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY, POLICY FRAMEWORKS AND SERVICE DELIVERY IN THE FOUR SECTORS (GOVERNANCE, RULE OF LAW, HEALTH AND AGRICULTURE AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT)?
EQ3. HAS EUD’S CAPACITY AND MANAGEMENT BEEN APPROPRIATE FOR ENSURING EFFICIENT AND EFFECTIVE AID DELIVERY IN AFGHANISTAN?
EQ4. ARE EU’S AID MODALITIES AND CHANNELS APPROPRIATE FOR ENSURING EFFICIENT AID DELIVERY IN AFGHANISTAN?
EQ5. TO WHAT EXTENT HAS THE EU CONTRIBUTED TO GENDER EQUALITY AND WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT IN THE FOUR FOCAL SECTORS GOVERNANCE, RULE OF LAW, HEALTH AND AGRICULTURE / RURAL DEVELOPMENT?
EQ6. HAS EU DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION BEEN COHERENT AND ACHIEVED SYNERGIES WITH THE SUPPORT PROVIDED BY OTHER DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS AND EU’S HUMANITARIAN AND POLITICAL ENGAGEMENT?
EQ7. HAS THE EU’S ASSISTANCE TO AFGHANISTAN AVOIDED HAVING ANY SIGNIFICANT NEGATIVE EFFECTS?
Author (Corp. Body): Lattanzio | European Centre for Development Policy Management | Ecorys | PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid
Year: 2018
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract No 2015/369112 Version 1
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: Afghanistanbest practiceevaluationdevelopment aid policyEUcooperationprogram planning
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesAfghanistan
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Thematic Evaluation of EU Support for Rule of Law in Neighbourhood Countries and Candidates and Potential Candidates of
Enlargement (2010-2017) : Final Report ; Volume 1 – Main Report
Title (other): Thematic Evaluation of EU Support for Rule of Law in Neighbourhood Countries and Candidates and Potential Candidates of
Enlargement (2010-2017) : Final Report ; Volume 2 – Case Studies | Thematic Evaluation of EU Support for Rule of Law in
Neighbourhood Countries and Candidates and Potential Candidates of Enlargement (2010-2017) : Final Report ; Volume 3 –
Annexes
Abstract
The purpose of this evaluation is to provide an independent, evidence-based assessment of the scope and performance of implemented and on-going EU support for Rule of Law (RoL). It focuses on interventions funded by the Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA I and II), the European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI) and its successor the European Neighbourhood Instrument (ENI) for the period 2007 to 2017.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
1 Introduction
1.1 Objectives of the evaluation
1.2 Evaluation scope and stakeholders
2 Methodology
2.1 Overall approach
2.2 Intervention logic
2.3 Data collection and analysis
2.4 Main challenges and limitations
3 Context
3.1 Context of EU Support to RoL
3.2 Background analysis of EU Support to RoL (Mapping)
4 Main findings
4.1 Strategic framework, design and implementation
4.2 Effects of the EU support to RoL
5 Conclusions
5.1 Cluster 1: Strategic framework
5.2 Cluster 2: Results
5.3 Cluster 3: Tools and approaches
6 Recommendations
Volume 2
1. Introduction to the case studies
2. Albania (IPA)
3. Montenegro (IPA)
4. Serbia(IPA)
5. Turkey (IPA)
6. Horizontal Facility (IPA/Regional)
7. Armenia (ENI)
8. Georgia (ENI)
9. Jordan (ENI)
10. Moldova (ENI)
11. Tunisia (ENI)
12. Ukraine (ENI)
13. EuroMed (ENI/Regional)
| Volume 3
Thematic Evaluation of EUSupport for Rule of Law in Neighbourhood Countries and 1 Annex 1 –ToR
1.1 MANDATE AND GENERIC OBJECTIVES
1.2 EVALUATION RATIONALE AND SPECIFIC OBJECTIVES
1.3 BACKGROUND
1.4 EVALUATION SCOPE
1.5 INDICATIVE EVALUATION QUESTIONS AND CRITERIA
1.6 RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE MANAGEMENT OF THE EVALUATION
1.7 PROCESS AND DELIVERABLES
1.8 THE EVALUATION TEAM
1.9 TIMING
1.10 OFFER FOR THE ASSIGNEMENT
1.11 TECHNICAL OFFERS SELECTION CRITERIA
1.12 ANNEXES
2 Annex 2 –Details on the Methodology
2.1 Methodological approach
2.2 Intervention logic
3 Annex 3 –Details on the Context
3.1 Details on the Context I: Context of EU Support to Rule of Law
3.2 Details on the Context II: Mapping of EU Support
3.3 Details on the Context III: International Indicators related to RoL
4 Annex 4 – Evaluation Matrix, including Summaries of Findings and Strength of Supporting Evidence
4.1Strategic framework, design and implementation
4.2 Effects of the EU support to RoL
5 Annex 5 –List of documents consulted
5.1 EU policy and regulatory documents
5.2 EU strategy and programming documents
5.3 EU project documents
5.4 EU guidelines
5.5 EU reporting
5.6 Evaluations and studies
5.7 Other country/regional specific studies, articles and national documentation
5.8 List of webpages
6 Annex 6 – Consultation Strategy, including OPC Summary and List of Persons and Institutions Consulted
6.1 Updated Consultation Strategy
6.2 Results of the Open Public Consultation
6.3 List of persons and institutions consulted
7 Annex 7 -Inventory of interventions considered under this evaluation
7.1 Neighbourhood East
7.2 Neighbourhood South
7.3 Neighbourhood Regional
7.4 Western Balkans and Turkey
7.5 Western Balkans and Turkey Regional
Author (Corp. Body): PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Directorate General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations | ECORYS NEI | European Centre for Development Policy Management | Fiscus | itad | OPM
Year: 2019
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: FWC COM 2015 | EuropeAid/137211/DH/SER/Multi | Specific Contract N°2017/389758 & 2017/389759 | Ref. Ares(2019)3031037
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationEUjoining of the European Unionassistancehuman rightsneighborhood helpprogram planningconstitutional state
Subject: Bilateral and multilateral aidEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesUkraineMoldovaAlbaniaMontenegroSerbia
TunisiaArmeniaGeorgiaTurkey
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
« Previous
Next »
Copyright (C) 2003-2019 European Documentation Centres / Update: 09.10.2019