Suche nach Schlagworten '00009378'

20 entries found on 1 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 20

Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),

« Previous
Next »
Title: Effectiveness of Market Surveillance in the Member States
Abstract
The study describes measures taken by Member States for the effective functioning and strengthening of market surveillance authorities, actions to set up market surveillance programmes and stepping-up control systems. It also gives an overview of the products presenting a serious risk..[European Parliament]
Author: Kidmose Rytz, Benita | Sylvest, Janne
Series Title:European Parliament - Study
Contributer: Ramboll Management Consulting, Aarhus, Denmark
Publisher: Europäische Union / Europäisches Parlament
Year: 2009
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: PE 416.241 | IPOL/A/IMCO/ST/2009-04
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: production goodmonitoringconsumer protection
Subject: Production control. Standards
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäisches Parlament (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/)
Title: Opinion of the Expert Group on Trafficking in Human Beings of the European Commission on measures in the Council of
Europe Convention on Action Against Trafficking in Human Beings to establish a Monitoring Mechanism
Author (Corp. Body): Expert group on trafficking in human beings European Commission Directorate General Justice and Home affairs | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Inneres
Year: 2004
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: slave trademonitoring
Subject: European Community external relations and associated countriesEuropean Community law in general
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu.int/)
Title: Interim evaluation of selection and monitoring procedures of European Capitals of Culture (ECoC) 2010-2016 : Final
Report
Author (Corp. Body): ECORYS NEI
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Bildung und Kultur
Year: 2011
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EUevaluationcapital citycultureselection proceduremonitoring
Subject: Cultural policy
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: http://ec.europa.eu
Title: Final report of an audit carried out in Greece from 09 to 19 April 2013 in order to evaluate the use of the traces
system
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Gesundheit und Verbraucher
Year: 2013
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: DG(SANCO) 2013-6895 - MR FINAL
Language: en
Ressource: Länderinformationen | Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: Animal productreportmonitoring
Subject: Animal production
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Final report of an audit carried out in Germany from 09 to 19 April 2013 in order to evaluate controls for contaminants
in food
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Gesundheit und Verbraucher
Year: 2013
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: DG(SANCO) 2013-6659 - MR FINAL
Language: en
Ressource: Länderinformationen | Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: reportgroceriesmonitoring
Subject: Feeding. Food
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Final report of an audit carried out in Romania from 15 to 26 April 2013 in order to evaluate the systems of import
controls for plant health
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Gesundheit und Verbraucher
Year: 2013
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: DG(SANCO) 2013-6796 - MR FINAL
Language: en
Ressource: Länderinformationen | Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: ImportPlantreportmonitoring
Subject: Imports
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Final report of an audit carried out in Greece from 09 to 19 April 2013 in order to evaluate the follow-up action taken
by the competent authorities with regard to the import/ Transit control system and implementation of commission decision
94/641/EC
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Gesundheit und Verbraucher
Year: 2013
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: DG(SANCO) 2013-6977 - MR FINAL | Ares(2013)3204462
Language: en
Ressource: Länderinformationen | Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: reportimportmonitoring
Subject: Imports
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Final report of an audit carried out in Sweden from 18 to 22 Marchl 2013 in order to evaluate the national procedures in
place to verify effectiveness of the import control system
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Gesundheit und Verbraucher
Year: 2013
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: DG(SANCO) 2013-6894 - MR FINAL | Ares(2013)3204516
Language: en
Ressource: Länderinformationen | Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: reportimportmonitoring
Subject: Imports
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Final report of an audit carried out in Portugal from 29 April to 08 May 2013 in order to evaluate the controls for
contaminants in food
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Gesundheit und Verbraucher
Year: 2013
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: DG(SANCO) 2013-6658 - MR FINAL | Ares(2013)3217511
Language: en
Ressource: Länderinformationen | Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: reportgroceriescontaminantmonitoring
Subject: Feeding. Food
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Final report of an audit carried out in India from 17 to 26 April 2013 in order to evaluate the system of official
controls for the export of plants and plant products to the European Union
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Gesundheit und Verbraucher
Year: 2013
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: DG(SANCO) 2013-6818 - MR FINAL | Ares(2013)3204598
Language: en
Ressource: Länderinformationen | Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: Agricultural cropreportexportgroceriesmonitoring
Subject: Exports
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Final report of an audit carried out in Lithuania from 29 May to 07 June 2013 in order to evaluate the food safety
control systems in place governing the production and placing on the market of fishery products
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Gesundheit und Verbraucher
Year: 2013
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: DG(SANCO) 2013-6671 - MR FINAL | Ares(2013)3190402
Language: en
Ressource: Länderinformationen | Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: Fisheries marketFish productreportgroceriesmonitoring
Subject: Fishery economics. Fishery research
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Cross Border Market Surveillance LVD ? ADCO Luminaires 2006
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission | Low Voltage Directive Administrative Cooperation
Year: 2006
Language: en
Ressource: Länderinformationen | Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: Marketreportmonitoring
Subject: International trade
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Community guide to the principles of good practice for the microbiological classification and monitoring of bivalve
mollusc production and relaying areas with regard to regulation 854/2004
Year: 2012
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: Animal productreportmonitoring
Subject: Animal husbandry and research
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Monitoring the EU platform on diet, physical activity and health : Specific contract N°SANCO/2012/1127355 ; Annual
report 2013
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Gesundheit und Verbraucher | EU Platform on Diet, Physical Activity and Health
Year: 2013
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: reporthealthmonitoring
Subject: Medical care. Health control
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Final report of an audit carried out in Lithuania from 20 May to 24 May 2013 in order to evaluate the use of the traces
system
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Gesundheit und Verbraucher
Year: 2013
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: DG(SANCO) 2013-6758 - MR FINAL | Ares(2013)2919425
Language: en
Ressource: Länderinformationen | Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: reportLithuaniamonitoring
Subject: Exports
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Final report of an audit carried out in Italy from 11 to 20 March 2013 in order to evaluate implementation of animal
health controls on African Swine Fever and the operation of the eradication programme for the disease in Sardinia
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Gesundheit und Verbraucher
Year: 2013
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: DG(SANCO) 2013-6788 - MR FINAL | Ares(2013)3437918
Language: en
Ressource: Länderinformationen | Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: Animal diseasereportItalymonitoring
Subject: Animal husbandry and research
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Comparative Study on Best Practices in the Field of Forced Return Monitoring : Final report ; JLS/2009/RFXX/CA/1001
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
1.0 Introduction
2.0 Methodology
2.1 Client Meetings and Key Deliverables2.3 Desk Research
2.4 Comparative Country Overview: Survey
2.5 Best Practice: Case Studies
3.0 Conceptual Framework
3.1 Basic Classification of Irregular Migrants
3.2 Voluntary and Forced Return
3.3 Features of a Standard Forced Returns Monitoring System
4.0 Comparative Country Overview
4.1 Overview of Voluntary and Forced Returns
4.2 Forced Returns Monitoring Systems
4.3 Organisations in Charge of Monitoring Forced Return
4.4 Scope of the Monitoring System
4.5 Tasks & Competencies of the Monitors
5.0 An Inventory of Best Practices
5.1 Organisations Involved in Monitoring Forced Returns
5.2 Scope of Monitoring System
5.3 Tasks and Competencies of Monitors
5.4 Frontex Flights
6.0 Conclusions & Recommendations (Checklist)
APPENDICES
Appendix A: Detailed Situation Across Member States
Appendix B: Bibliography
Appendix C: Survey Questionnaire
Appendix D: Country Profiles
Austria
...
Iceland
...
Switzerland
United Kingdom
Appendix E: Interview Question Catalogue
Appendix F: Case Studies
Austria
Belgium
France
Germany
Latvia
Luxembourg
Norway
Poland
Switzerland
Author (Corp. Body): Matrix insight | International Centre for Migration Policy Development, Wien
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Inneres
Year: 2011
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: JLS/2009/RFXX/CA/1001
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: deportationbest practiceEUmonitoring
Subject: European Community law in generalMigrationVarious information networks and systems
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: DG NEAR : Guidelines on linking planning/programming, monitoring and evaluation
Title (other): DG NEAR : Guidelines on linking planning/programming, monitoring and evaluation ; Annexes
Table of Contents
PREFACE
TABLE OF CONTENTS
LIST OF ACRONYMS
GLOSSARY
1. INTRODUCTION
PART 0: KEY PRINCIPLES AND CONCEPTS, USES AND ACTORS
2. DEFINITIONS
2.1. MONITORING
2.2. EVALUATION
3. PRINCIPLES AND STANDARDS
3.1. MONITORING PRINCIPLES
3.2. EVALUATION PRINCIPLES
5. EVALUATION CRITERIA
6. REASONS AND USES OF M&E;
6.1. WHY MONITOR? WHY EVALUATE?
6.2. USERS
6.3. CONNECTION BETWEEN MONITORING AND EVALUATION M&E;
6.3.1. TWO SEPARATE YET COMPLEMENTARY AREAS OF PRACTICE
6.3.2. WHEN TO USE MONITORING AND WHEN TO PLAN EVALUATIONS
6.3.3. FROM MONITORING TO EVALUATION
6.3.4. FROM EVALUATIONS TO MONITORING
7. MAIN GENERAL RESPONSIBILITIES FOR M & E
7.1. MONITORING ACTORS
7.2. EVALUATION ACTORS
PART 1: LINKING PLANNING/PROGRAMMING, MONITORING AND EVALUATION: M&E; THROUGH THE INTERVENTION CYCLE
8. DEFINING THE INTERVENTION LOGIC AS A STARTING POINT
8.1. WHAT IS IT?
8.1.1. IS THERE A DIFFERENCE BETWEEN AN INTERVENTION LOGIC AND THE LOGICAL FRAMEWORK APPROACH?
8.2. WHY DO WE NEED IT?
8.3. HOW IS IT DEFINED?
8.3.1. PRE-CONDITIONS
8.3.2. STEPS: DEFINING THE INTERVENTION LOGIC'S DIAGRAM (STEPS 1 TO 5), DEVELOPING THE INTERVENTION LOGIC'S NARRATIVE (STEP 6)
8.3.2.1. Step 1: identification of needs (the overall objective(s))
8.3.2.2. Step 2: identification of the specific objectives (the outcomes)
8.3.2.3. Step 3: identification of the outputs
8.3.2.4. Step 4: identification of the activities
8.3.2.5. Step 5: develop the indicators
8.3.2.6. Step 6: develop the narrative
9. DEFINING INDICATORS: SETTING THE BASIS FOR M&E;
9.1. DEFINITION, PURPOSE AND USES
9.1.1. WHAT IS AN INDICATOR?
9.1.2. WHY DO WE NEED INDICATORS? THEIR PURPOSE AND USE DURING PLANNING/PROGRAMMING, MONITORING AND EVALUATION
9.1.2.1. During planning/programming: a way to improve the way interventions are drafted (intervention logic’s design)
9.1.2.2. During monitoring: a way to steer intervention’s implementation (management)
| 13. EVALUATION MANAGEMENT PHASES: PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION, REPORTING, FOLLOW-UP
13.1. WHAT TO EVALUATE AND RESOURCES ALLOCATED
13.1.1. EVALUATION PLANS
13.1.2. APPOINTMENT OF AN EVALUATION MANAGER
13.1.3. FUNDING OF THE EVALUATION
13.2. PREPARATORY PHASE
13.2.1. SETTING UP AN INTER-SERVICE STEERING GROUP/REFERENCE GROUP
13.2.2. EVALUATION ROADMAP
13.2.3. TERMS OF REFERENCE
13.2.3.1. Evaluation questions
13.3. IMPLEMENTATION
13.3.1. INCEPTION PHASE
13.3.1.1. Consultation strategy
13.3.2. DESK PHASE
13.3.1. FIELD PHASE
13.3.1. SYNTHESIS PHASE
13.3.1.1. Final evaluation report
13.3.1.2. Evaluation Staff Working Document
13.4. DISSEMINATION AND FOLLOW-UP
13.4.1. DISSEMINATING THE EVALUATION RESULTS
13.4.2. FOLLOW-UP ACTION PLAN AFTER COMPLETION OF THE EVALUATION
REFERENCES
| 9.1.2.3. During evaluation: a way to demonstrate results to internal and external stakeholders (accountability)
9.2. TYPE, COMPONENTS AND CHARACTERISTICS OF INDICATORS
9.2.1. TYPE OF INDICATORS
9.2.1.1. Quantitative versus qualitative indicators
9.2.1.2. The intervention logic levels: input, output, outcome and impact indicators
9.2.2. HOW TO DEFINE AN INDICATOR? WHAT ARE ITS COMPONENTS?
9.2.3. WHAT ARE THE CHARACTERISTICS OF INDICATORS?
9.2.4. INDICATOR FRAMEWORKS FOR ENI & IPA II
9.2.4.1. ENI
9.2.4.2. IPA II
9.3. WHO SHOULD TAKE PART IN THE PROCESS?
9.4. PRACTICAL STEPS IN DEFINING, VERIFYING,USING INDICATORS FOR REPORTING FOR ACTION PROGRAMMES
9.4.1. STEP 1 – RECONSTRUCT THE INTERVENTION LOGIC
9.4.2. STEP 2 – IDENTIFICATION/SELECTION OF INDICATORS
9.4.3. STEP 3 – IDENTIFY SOURCES AND CALCULATION METHODS
9.4.4. STEP 4 – IDENTIFY BASELINE VALUES AND TIMING
9.4.5. STEP 5 – ESTABLISH TARGETS
9.4.6. STEP 6 – VALIDATE INDICATORS
9.4.7. STEP 7 – DESIGN THE DATA COLLECTION SYSTEMS
PART 2: MONITORING FOR RESULTS
10. TYPES
11. MONITORING MANAGEMENT PHASES: PLANNING, IMPLEMENTATION, REPORTING, FOLLOW-UP
11.1. WHAT TO MONITOR AND RESOURCES ALLOCATED
11.1.1. RISK ASSESSMENT
11.1.2. MONITORING PLANS
11.1.1. FUNDING OF THE MONITORING
11.2. IMPLEMENTATION
11.2.1. READINESS ASSESSMENT OF THE INTERNAL MONITORING SYSTEM FOR A GIVEN ACTION
11.2.2. DECIDE WHAT TO MONITOR
11.2.3. ACTUAL (INTERNAL) MONITORING
11.3. INTERNAL MONITORING REPORTING
11.3.1. FOCUS OF REPORTING
11.3.1.1. Implementing partner reporting
11.3.1.1. EC HQs/EUD reporting
11.3.2. INTERNAL MONITORING NOTE/REPORTS VS OTHER INFORMATION SHARING TOO LS
11.1. DISSEMINATION AND FOLLOW-UP
PART 3: EVALUATING FOR RESULTS
12. TYPES
12.1. BY PURPOSE
12.2. BY AGENT
12.3. BY TIMING IN THE INTERVENTION’S CYCLE
12.3.1. BETTER REGULATION REQUIREMENTS ON THE TIMING OF EVALUATIONS
12.4. BY SCOPE
12.1. OTHER
| Annexes
ANNEX 1: KEY ELEMENTS OF THE BETTER REGULATION
ANNEX 2: TEMPLATE OFAN ACTION'S INTERVENTION LOGIC (EN & FR)
ANNEX 3: TEMPLATE OFA BUDGET SUPPORT PROGRAMME INTERVENTION LOGIC (EN & FR)
ANNEX 4: EXAMPLE OF A THEORY OF CHANGERECONSTRUCTION
ANNEX 5: OTHER APPROACH USED IN RECONSTRUCTING A THEORY OF CHANGE: OUTCOME MAPPING
ANNEX 6: INDICATORS PARAMETERS
ANNEX 7: EXAMPLES OFQUESTIONS THAT COULDBE USED TO GENERATE INDICATORS
ANNEX 8: EXAMPLES OF(LEVEL 1) STRATEGIC/DEVELOPMENT PROGRESSINDICATORS RELEVANT FOR DG NEAR (ENI & IPA II)
ANNEX 9: EXAMPLES OF(LEVEL 2) OUTPUT ANDOUTCOME INDICATORS RELEVANT FOR DG DG NEAR (ENI & IPA II)
ANNEX 10: EXAMPLES OF (LEVEL 3) INTERVENTION/ORGANISATIONAL PERFORMANCE INDICATORS RELEVANT FOR DG NEAR(ENI & IPA II)
ANNEX 11: CHECKLIST FOR ON THE SPOT CHECK MONITORING-SERVICES
ANNEX 12: CHECKLIST FOR ON THE SPOT CHECK MONITORING -SUPPLY DIS
ANNEX 13: CHECKLIST FOR ON THE SPOT CHECK MONITORING -WORKS
ANNEX 14: CHECKLIST FOR OVERALL ON THE SPOT CHECK MONITORING-GRANT SCHEMES* (DECENTRALISED)
ANNEX 15: CHECKLIST FOR ON THE SPOT CHECK MONITORING -GRANTS (DECONCENTRATED)
ANNEX 16: MONITORING BY NATIONAL AUTHORITIES IN IPA II
1. ACTION MONITORING
2. DATA PRODUCTION AND MONITORING OF INDICATORS
3. SECTOR STRATEGIC MONITORING
4. SYSTEM MONITORING
ANNEX 17: EVALUATIONTASK-BUDGET TEMPLATE
ANNEX 18: EVALUATIONAPPROACHES AND METHODS
1. COUNTERFACTUAL APPROACH TO IMPACT EVALUATION
2. THEORY-BASED EVALUATION
3. REALIST EVALUATION
4. PARTICIPATORY EVALUATION
5. POSITIVE APPROACHES
ANNEX 19: EVALUATION QUESTIONS, TYPES OF EVALUATIONS IN DG NEAR PRACTICE AND POSSIBLE APPROACHES TO EVALUATION
ANNEX 20: QUALITY ASSESSMENT GRID FOR A PROJECT / PROGRAMME EVALUATION REPORT AND GUIDELINES FOR ITS FULFILMENT
ANNEX 21: EVALUATION RECOMMENDATIONS FOLLOW-UP TEMPLATE
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Directorate General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations
Year: 2016
Language: en
Ressource: Anleitungen, Checklisten, Leitfäden, Lehrmaterial
Keyword: financial aidevaluationEUjoining of the European UnionEU expansionprogram planningdirectivemonitoring
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: IPA II Monitoring, Reporting and Performance Framework : Final report
Title (other): IAP II – Suivi, Rapports and Cadre de Performance (SRCP) : Résumé excutif final
Abstract
The assignment for IPA II Monitoring, Reporting and Performance Framework (MRPF) has lasted over roughly one year, from December 2014 to December 2015, and its three successive Specific Objectives or components have been the following:Specific Objective 1: Help design and streamline the monitoring and reporting system (hereafter MRPF) in the context of IPA II assistance by assessing the state of play and legal requirements and by providing recommendations in a view of improving the relevance, quality and consistency of the monitoring and reporting framework.Specific Objective 2: Assess the limits of the evaluability and the scope of the Mid-Term Review of the IPA and ENI (instruments) to be carried out in 2017, having regard to the regulatory requirements, the institutional setting of the new financial instrument(s) and the monitoring of the degree of realisation of activities and results by that time and the monitoring and reporting system put in place.Specific Objective 3: Provide recommendations on how to ensure sufficient visibility of the IPA II performance, including ways to enhance transparency and improve compliance with the International Aid Transparency Standards, as well as ways to strengthen the relevance, quality and impact of the related information and communication activities[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Acronyms and Abbreviations
Executive Summary
INTRODUCTION
1. MONITORING, REPORTING AND PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK (MRPF)
1.1 Key Findings1.2 Assessment
1.3 Recommendations
1.3.1 General Recommendations
1.3.2 Specific recommendations on the MRPF architecture in each one of the IPA II beneficiaries
1.3.3 Multi-beneficiary Dimension of IPA II MRPF and Potential Role of ReSPA
2. EVALUABILITY OF IPA II MTR 2017
2.1 Key Findings & Conclusions
2.1.1 General Outline
2.1.2 How the specific requirements of the Regulations should be approached?
2.1.3 How the evaluation criteria should be approached/ used?
2.1.4 Are the indicators included in the Regulations, Programme Statement (PS) and Indicative (country & multi-country) Strategy Papers aligned and thus appropriate and sufficient for the implementation of the MTR 2017?
2.1.5 Which are the sources of information to be used for the MTR 2017 and how the required info/data should be collected and processed? Are intermediate evaluations (thematic, other) needed to be implemented, in order to contribute to specific subjects where direct info/data do not exist?
2.1.6 Which are the critical parameters for the data collection in view of the available time and the limited progress in the implementation of the IPA II actions?
2.1.7 How the required public consultation (general -for the wider public and specific -for the IPA II stakeholders) should be organized & implemented?
2.2 Assessment of the Evaluability of the MTR 2017
2.3 Recommendations
3. VISIBILITY OF IPA II PERFORMANCE
Introduction
3.1 Key Findings and Conclusions
3.1.1 Visibility
3.1.2 Transparency
3.2 Assessment
3.3 Recommendations
3.3.1 Communication Strategy of DG NEAR
3.3.2 Recommendations
4. PROPOSAL FOR IMMEDIATE FOLLOW-UP ACTION
ANNEXES
Annex 1 – Comprehensive Fieldwork Findings in IPA Beneficiaries
A 1.1 Recapitulated Fieldwork Findings from Albania
A 1.2 Recapitulated Fieldwork Findings from Bosnia & Herzegovina
| A 1.3 Recapitulated Fieldwork Findings from the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
A 1.5 Recapitulated Fieldwork Findings from Serbia
A 1.6 Recapitulated Fieldwork Findings from Montenegro
A 1.7 Recapitulated Fieldwork Findings from Kosovo
Annex 2 – Existing processes of reporting on implementation progress in IPA Beneficiaries
Annex 3 – IPA II MRPF Processes
Annex 4 – Main Findings of CS E-survey
Annex 5 – Terms of Reference
Author (Corp. Body): B & S Europe | Proman
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Directorate General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations
Year: 2016
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Specific Contract N° 2014/351 - 964
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: AlbaniaevaluationBosnia and Herzegovinadevelopment aidEUjoining of the European UnionKosovoMacedonia
Montenegroprogram planningSerbiamonitoring
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: ROM Handbook : Results Oriented Monitoring ; Guidance for ROM reviews and support to end-of-project results reporting
for projects and programmes financed by the European Union within the framework of its external assistance ; Version 4.0
Title (other): Handbook on ROM reviews and support to end-of-project results reporting
Abstract
This ROM Handbook presents the detailed rules, modalities, specifications and quality standards governing the organisation and carrying out of the Results Oriented Monitoring (ROM) system implemented as from 2015 under the responsibility of the European Commission’s Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development. It aims to assist, with external consultants, the Commission’s services and its representations (EU Delegations -EUD) in the partner countries and regions in the monitoring of and reporting on the implementation of projects and programmes financed within the framework of the EU’s external assistance. This assistance represents the follow-up of the former ROM system implemented since the beginning of the devolution in 2000.The reforms contained in the new ROM system are part of a wider set of reforms relating to its overall project and programme monitoring, reporting and evaluation systems. The reforms are designed to enhance the Commission’s accountability and management capacities with a stronger focus on results at all levels, including the EU's corporate level as a donor, through the new EU international Cooperation and Development Results Framework.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
3.8 Internal quality control
3.9 Comments by EC services and follow-up
3.9.1 Comments by EC services
3.9.2 Follow-up to the ROM report
4 Support to End of Project results reporting
4.1 Preparation of the workplan for results reporting support missions
4.1.1 Steps in preparing the workplan
4.1.2 Assigning ROM experts to results reporting missions
4.1.3 Communication with EUD and EC HQ operational units
4.2 Preparatory tasks for Desk Phase and for the Expert’s Mission to the Delegation/HQ unit
4.3 Desk phase - results reporting support missions
4.4 The results reporting support mission
4.4.1 Briefing
4.4.2 Completing results reporting template with OM for each project or programme
4.4.3 Debriefing
4.5 Results reporting mission outputs
4.5.1 Consolidated results reporting templates
4.5.2 Narrative reports
4.6 Quality control
4.6.1 Initial quality control by ROM Contractor
4.6.2 Additional quality control by ROM Coordination Unit on results reporting
4.6.3 Finalisation of results reporting template
4.7 Annual Calendar for ROM support to results reporting
5 Consolidated Analysis reports by ROM contractors
5.1 Annual and Final (end of contract) Consolidated analysis of ROM reviews
5.2 Annual consolidated analysis of results reporting support
5.3 Quarterly and Annual quality control reports
6 Reporting on implementation by ROM contractors
6.1 Six-monthly progress reports
6.2 Final report
7 ROM Quality Assurance
7.1 The ROM quality cycle and the place of the ROM Quality assurance
7.2 Scope of the QA contract
7.3 QA experts team
7.4 Tasks of QA Contractor
7.5 Expected QA deliverables
7.5.1 QA reports on individual ROM reviews
7.5.2 Quarterly QA reports
7.5.3 annual QA report
7.5.4 QA implementation progress reports
7.5.5 QA End-of-contract report
Annexes
Tables
Figures
| Table of Contents
Abbreviations
Introduction
1 Monitoring and reporting
1.1 Monitoring
1.1.1 Monitoring by the implementing partners
1.1.2 Internal monitoring by EU Delegations and EC HQ Services
1.1.3 External support through ROM
1.2 Reporting on results
1.2.1 Stepping up EU efforts,including the EU International Cooperation and Development Results Framework
1.2.2 ROM support to end-of-project results reporting
2 Actors in ROM reviews and support to results reporting
2.1 EC Services
2.1.1 ROM Coordination Unit (DEVCO.05)
2.1.2 ROM coordinators
2.1.3 ROM Focal Points in EUD and EC HQ operational units
2.1.4 OM in EUD and EC HQ
2.2 Implementing partners and other stakeholders
2.2.1 Implementing partners
2.2.2 Other key stakeholders
2.3 ROM contractors
2.3.1 Geographic and thematic contracts
2.3.2 Experts
2.4 Contractor for ROM quality assurance
3 ROM Reviews
3.1 ROM module
3.2 Establishment by EC Services of the lists of projects to be subject to ROM reviews
3.3 Preparation of the ROM Review workplan
3.3.1 Preparation of the workplan
3.3.2 Computation of costs
3.4 Preparatory tasks for Desk and Field Phase
3.4.1 Preparation for the Desk Phase
3.4.2 Preparation for the Field Phase
3.5 Desk phase – review of documentation
3.5.1 Tasks
3.5.2 Logframe/list of performance indicators
3.5.3 Project implementation progress reports
3.6 Field phase
3.6.1 Format of briefing and debriefing
3.6.2 Role of actors in the Briefing
3.6.3 Field visits and interviews
3.6.4 Debriefing and role of actors
3.7 Reporting phase
3.7.1 Deliverables and reporting process
3.7.2 Analysing key documentation and interviews with stakeholders
3.7.3 Monitoring questions for projects and programmes
3.7.4. ROM review report
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Internationale Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung
Year: 2017
Language: en
Ressource: Anleitungen, Checklisten, Leitfäden, Lehrmaterial
Keyword: foreign policyevaluationdevelopment aidEUfinancial assistancemanualprogrammonitoring
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIBEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
« Previous
Next »
Copyright (C) 2003-2019 European Documentation Centres / Update: 09.10.2019