Suche nach Schlagworten '00010029'

2 entries found on 1 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 2

Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),

« Previous
Next »
Title: Migration and public perception
Author: Beutin, Ricklef | Canoy, Marcel | Anna Horvath, | Hubert, Agnes | Lerais, Frédéric | Smith, Peter | Sochacki, Myriam
Contributer: Bureau of European Policy Advisers
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Inneres
Year: 2006
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: citizenEuropemigrationperception
Subject: Social theory and welfare economicsMigration
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of Visibility of EU external action : Final Report ; Volume 1
Title (other): Evaluation of Visibility of EU external action : Final Report ; Volume 2 – Annexes Part 1 | Evaluation of Visibility of
EU external action : Final Report ; Volume 3 – Annexes Part 2 | Evaluation of Visibility of EU external action : Final
Report ; Volume 4 – Thematic Report on Crisis and Fragile States | Evaluation of Visibility of EU external action :
Final Report ; Volume 5 – Thematic Report on Financial and Economic Crisis | Evaluation of Visibility of EU external
action : Final Report ; Volume 6 – Thematic Report on Food Crisis | Evaluation of Visibility of EU external action :
Final Report ; Volume 7 – Thematic Report on Migration Part 1 - Mali | Evaluation of Visibility of EU external action :
Final Report ; Volume 8 – Thematic Report on Climate Change and Energy | Evaluation of Visibility of EU external action
: Final Report ; Volume 9 – Thematic Report on Environment, Biodiversity and Deforestation | Fiche Contradictoire :
Evaluation of the Visibility of EU external action 2005-2010 | Quality Grid : Visibility of EU External Action ; Final
Report, June 2012 | Thematic Evaluation of the Visibility of EU external action : 2005-2010
Abstract
The mandate for this study was to undertake an evaluation of EU external action as managed by three DGs: DG RELEX, DG DEV and DG AIDCO. The Terms of Reference identified two main objectives (ToR, Feb 2010, Section 1 – reproduced in Annex 1):· To provide an overall independent assessment of the visibility of the Commission’s external action· To identify key lessons to improve current and future Commission strategies on visibility.The ToR also set out the temporal scope, 2005 to 2010, and a geographical scope that is essentially global with the exception of the EU enlargement countries. Stakeholders from both inside and outside the EU, in both partner countries and global organisations, were to be covered. The main element to limit the focus of the study was the designation of six themes which were to be the object of thematic studies involving six field visits to different countries (listed below – section 1.3).Finally the ToR also asked for the evaluation to be forward looking, providing lessons and recommendations concerning visibility and also on coordination within the EU and on coherence within the EU and internationally.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1 Purpose of the Evaluation
1.2 Background of the Evaluation
1.3 Methodology
1.4 Analysis of the main findings for each Evaluation Question
1.5 Main Conclusions and Recommendations
2. INTRODUCTION
2.1 Synthesis of the Commission’s Strategy and Programmes
2.2 Context
2.3 Purpose of this Evaluation
3. METHODOLOGY
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Judgement Criteria & Indicators
3.3 Data & Information Collection
3.3.1 Thematic Studies
3.3.2 Media Coverage Analysis
3.3.3 E-Survey
3.3.4 Interviews with Brussels-based actors
3.3.5 Eurobarometer reports analysis
3.3.6 Case studies of specific events and partnerships
3.4 Methods of Analysis
3.5 Methods of Judgement
4. MAIN FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS
4.1 Findings from the Thematic Studies and the other Data Sources
4.1.1 Findings from the Thematic Studies
4.1.2 Case studies of specific events and partnerships
4.1.3 Findings from other sources
4.2 Answers to each Evaluation Question
4.2.1 EQ1: The image of EU external action
4.2.2 EQ2: Do the Visibility communication priorities achieve their objectives?
4.2.3 EQ3: A single, clearly defined Visibility strategy for EU external action?
4.2.4 EQ4: Perceptions of the benefits of EU external action
4.2.5 EQ5: Coordination between the EU institutions and with the EU Member States?
4.2.6 EQ 6: Coherence of message across external and internal policies?
4.2.7 EQ 7: Value added of the EU as a global actor in major international fora?
4.2.8 EQ8: Adequacy of EC resources to carry out the visibility strategy
4.2.9 EQ9: Stakeholder perceptions of results relative to the costs
4.2.10 EQ10: Translating visibility strategies into action plans
| 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Conclusions
5.1.1 The image of EU external action is generally in line with pre-Lisbon officialpriorities
5.1.2 Communication work on EU external action lacks overall direction and leadership
5.1.3 Working in partnership with others is essential but there is a trade-off in lower EUvisibility
5.1.4 The image of EU external action varies geographically as well as by constituency
5.1.5 The nature of the EU imposes constraints that impact on its visibility
5.1.6 The resources for promoting the visibility of EU external action have been adequate
5.2 Recommendations
5.2.1 Reaffirm, renew and strengthen the established image of EU external action
5.2.2 Provide stronger central direction and leadership for communication work on EUexternal action
5.2.3 Agree that ‘working in partnership’ is an intrinsic part of the image of EU externalaction and a core message for communication
5.2.4 Manage sensitively geographic and constituency variations in the visibility of EUexternal action
5.2.5 Pay special attention to the impact on visibility of the EU’s specific nature
5.2.6 Review the distribution of resources for promoting the visibility of EU externalaction particularly at the level of EU Delegations
5.2.7 Other specific recommendations for each theme
5.3 Summary of key conclusions and recommendations
LIST OF BOXES, FIGURES AND TABLES
VOLUME 2 – ANNEXES PART 1
ANNEX 1: TERMS OF REFERENCE
ANNEX 2: THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
ANNEX 3: THE EU LEGAL FRAMEWORK: THE EXTERNAL ACTION OF THE EU
ANNEX 4: INTERVENTION LOGIC
ANNEX 5: STANDARD FORMAT FOR COLLECTING EVIDENCE IN RELATION TO THE EQS
ANNEX 6: THE ORGANIZATION OF COMMUNICATION ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE COMMISSION
ANNEX 7: COUNTRY SELECTION
ANNEX 8: GUIDELINES FOR THE THEMATIC WORK
ANNEX 9: EVIDENCE FROM INTERVIEWS WITH EU OFFICIALS IN RELATION TO THE EQS
ANNEX 10: REPORT FROM INTERVIEWS WITH CIVIL SOCIETY
ANNEX 11: LIST OF PEOPLE INTERVIEWED
| VOLUME 3 – ANNEXES PART 2
ANNEX 12: MEDIA COVERAGE ANALYSIS
ANNEX 13: E-SURVEY – SYNTHESIS REPORT
ANNEX 14: THE PARTNERSHIP WITH THE UNITED NATIONS
ANNEX 15: EUROBAROMETER SURVEY
ANNEX 16: CASE STUDY: TUNISIA
ANNEX 17: BIBLIOGRAPHY
VOLUMES 4-9: THEMATIC REPORTS ON THE SIX THEMES
VOLUME 4: THEMATIC REPORT ON CRISIS AND FRAGILE STATES
VOLUME 5: THEMATIC REPORT ON FINANCIAL & ECONOMIC CRISIS
VOLUME 6: THEMATIC REPORT ON FOOD CRISIS
VOLUME 7: THEMATIC REPORT ON MIGRATION - PART 1: MALI & PART 2: LAMPEDUSA
VOLUME 8: THEMATIC REPORT ON CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENERGY
VOLUME 9: THEMATIC REPORT ON ENVIRONMENT, BIODIVERSITY AND DEFORESTATION
Author (Corp. Body): PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt, Freiburg im Breisgau
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Aide a? la De?cision Economique, Ottignies Louvain la Neuve | Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, Berlin | DRN | European
Year: 2012
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: EuropeAid/122888/C/SER/Multi | EVA 2007 – Lot 5
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: foreign policyevaluationbiodiversityenergy policydevelopment aid policyEUfinancial crisisglobalization
climate changecooperationcrisis interventionMalimigrationfoodTunisiaenvironmental policyperceptioneconomic crisis
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Global ResourcesEurope. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
« Previous
Next »
Copyright (C) 2003-2019 European Documentation Centres / Update: 09.10.2019