Suche nach Schlagworten '00222357'
20 entries found on 1 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 20Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),
« Previous
Next »
Title: EMCC company network : Case example of the Bank of Cyprus Public Company Ltd |
---|
Abstract The Bank of Cyprus Public Company Ltd. was founded in 1899 and is the holding company of the Bank of Cyprus Group. The Bank is the leading financial services organisation in Cyprus and operates 115 branches in Greece. It is also well established in the United Kingdom, where it operates six branches. The Group's international activities were extended in 2000 with the opening of a wholly owned subsidiary bank in Australia, which operates ten branches. The bank also has representative offices in the USA, Canada, South Africa, Russia and Romania. It offers a wide range of financial products and services, including financing, leasing, factoring, brokerage, fund management, general and life insurance. It employed 6,100 staff worldwide in August 2006, most of whom were white-collar workers. [Author vide Copyright] |
Author (Corp. Body): European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Dublin |
Year: 2007 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: EF/07/13/EN C4 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Arbeitspapiere, Preprints |
Keyword: BankFinancial servicescase studycross border cooperation |
Subject: Financial institutions. Credit systems. Payment systemsEnterprises |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (http://eurofound.europa.eu) |
Title: EMCC company network : Managing change in EU cross-border mergers and acquisitions ; Case example : Danske Bank and Irish National Bank: Viking raider is knight in shining armour |
---|
Abstract The European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions organised a seminar for its company network on November 29-30, 2007, hosted by Santander at its corporate headquarters in Madrid, Spain. In intensive discussions over the two days, 32 representatives from companies, trade unions, universities, research organisations and the European Commission discussed the management of change in EU cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M & A). The Danske Bank/National Irish Bank case was presented jointly by Søren Rahbek, Senior Vice President responsible for Human Resources Development at Danske Bank, Sean McGrath, Head of Human Resources at National Irish Bank and Larry Broderick, General Secretary of Irish Bank Officials Association (IBOA). [Author vide Copyright] |
Author: Huws,Ursula | O? Keefe, Brie |
Publisher: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Dublin |
Year: 2008 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: EF/08/04/EN 2 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Arbeitspapiere, Preprints |
Keyword: BankMergerMerger controlTakeovercase studycross border cooperation |
Subject: Economic and growth policiesFinancial institutions. Credit systems. Payment systemsEnterprises |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (http://eurofound.europa.eu) |
Title: EMCC company network : Managing change in EU cross-border mergers and acquisitions ; Case example : Schneider Electric: Acquiring to grow |
---|
Abstract The European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions organised a seminar for its company network on November 29-30, 2007, hosted by Santander at its corporate headquarters in Madrid, Spain. In intensive discussions over the two days, 32 representatives from companies, trade unions, universities, research organisations and the European Commission discussed the management of change in EU cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M & A). The Schneider Electric case was presented by Robert Immele, Senior Vice-President responsible for Corporate Strategy and Acquisition at the company. [Author vide Copyright] |
Author: Huws,Ursula | O? Keefe, Brie |
Publisher: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Dublin |
Year: 2008 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: EF/08/04/EN 5 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Arbeitspapiere, Preprints |
Keyword: MergerMerger controlTakeovercase studycross border cooperation |
Subject: Economic and growth policiesEnterprises |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (http://eurofound.europa.eu) |
Title: EMCC company network : Managing change in EU cross-border mergers and acquisitions ; Case example : Air France-KLM: Combining strengths for sustainability |
---|
Abstract The European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions organised a seminar for its company network on November 29-30, 2007, hosted by Santander at its corporate headquarters in Madrid, Spain. In intensive discussions over the two days, 32 representatives from companies, trade unions, universities, research organisations and the European Commission discussed the management of change in EU cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&A;). The Air France-KLM case was presented by Emmanuel Jahan, the company's director of EU Affairs. [Author vide Copyright] |
Author: Huws,Ursula | O? Keefe, Brie |
Publisher: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions, Dublin |
Year: 2008 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: EF/08/04/EN 1 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Arbeitspapiere, Preprints |
Keyword: MergerMerger controlAirlineTakeovercase studycross border cooperation |
Subject: FrontiersEconomic and growth policiesEnterprises |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (http://eurofound.europa.eu) |
Title: EMCC company network - Managing change in EU cross-border mergers and acquisitions - Case example: Santander and Abbey: Expansion enabling access to new markets |
---|
Abstract The European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions organised a seminar for its company network on November 29-30, 2007, hosted by international bank Santander at its corporate headquarters in Madrid, Spain. In intensive discussions over the two days, 32 representatives from companies, trade unions, universities, research organisations and the European Commission discussed the management of change in EU cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M & A). The Santander-Abbey case was presented by Javier Bugallo, HR Director, Abbey and Juan Maria Gorostidi Pulgar, Director of Labour Relations for the Santander group. [Author vide Copyright] |
Author: Huws,Ursula | O? Keefe, Brie |
Publisher: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions |
Year: 2008 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Arbeitspapiere, Preprints |
Keyword: MergerMerger controlTakeovercross border cooperation |
Subject: Economic and growth policiesEnterprises |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (http://eurofound.europa.eu) |
Title: Health Services in the EEA |
---|
Abstract Health policy has traditionally been an area governed principally by the law of individual member states. There is a general consensus among the member states and also the European Union (EU) institutions that this should not fundamentally change in the future. Despite a general acceptance of that principle, member states had also to realise that establishing an internal market - i.e. freeing the movement of goods, persons and services - requires at least to some extent a common approach - be it through the coordination of national policies or, in specific cases, even through harmonisation. Healthcare is no exception. [Professor Dr. Dominik Hanf] |
Author: Hanf, Dominik |
Series Title:European Parliament - Briefing Paper |
Publisher: Europäische Union / Europäisches Parlament |
Year: 2008 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: PE 388.937 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: EEAhealth carecross border cooperationhealth insurancemobility |
Subject: Health. IllnessMedical care. Health control |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäisches Parlament (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/) |
Title: Global Evaluation of the European Neighbourhood Partnership Instrument |
---|
Abstract The study finds that ENP policy documents and ENPI budgetary allocations are fairly well aligned with the strategic objectives of EU external policy, and that planned interventions are well aligned with partner countries' needs and development priorities. Regarding performance, although ENPI allows for a more flexible and efficient use of resources compared to its predecessors (MEDA and TACIS), it still too early to assess whether these structural improvements has brought about improved results.[European Parliament] |
Series Title:European Parliament - Study |
Author (Corp. Body): Economisti Associati srl Via Rialto Bologna Italy |
Publisher: Europäische Union / Europäisches Parlament |
Year: 2008 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: evaluationbudgetcross border cooperationpartnership |
Subject: International cooperationInternational relationsMoney. Financing |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäisches Parlament (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/) |
Title: Engaging other main actors: Engaging emerging economies Removing barriers for technology cooperation |
---|
Author: Borbonus, Sylvia |
Series Title:European Parliament - Note |
Publisher: Europäische Union / Europäisches Parlament |
Year: 2008 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: PE 401.005 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: cross border cooperationtechnology transfer |
Subject: International cooperationEconomic development. Economic growthInternational market. International division of labourEnterprisesTechnology |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäisches Parlament (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/) |
Title: Integration without accession: The EU?s special relationship with the countries in its neighbourhood |
---|
Abstract This study was inspired by the former Article I-57 of the Treaty establishing a constitution for Europe but is equally pertinent for the provisions on a European neighbourhood policy of the Treaty of Lisbon signed on December 13, 2007 (new Article 7a TUE). The report explores the institutional and policy choices concerning the European Unions relations with the surrounding countries and regions in its neighbourhood. It surveys the current state of the European Neighbourhood Policy (ENP) and, in particular, the perceptions of the partner countries of how the EU contends with a series of political dilemmas. Different models for organising relations with neighbouring countries - pre-accession, the European Economic Area (EEA) and association - are analysed. The study suggests that in order to conceive of "special relationship" as more than simply a scheme in between association and accession, such a paradigm could be supplemented by another dimension: that of decentred integration..[European Parliament] |
Author: Bechev, Dimitar |
Series Title:European Parliament - Study |
Publisher: Europäische Union / Europäisches Parlament |
Year: 2007 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: PE 393. 270 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: bilateral relationscross border cooperation |
Subject: International cooperationInternational relationsForeign policy |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäisches Parlament (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/) |
Title: Full Compensation of Victims of Cross-Border Road Traffic Accidents in the Eu: the Economic Impact of Selected Options |
---|
Abstract Cross-border road traffic accidents raising jurisdictional issues represent about 1% of road traffic accidents in the EU27. The direct costs of these accidents can be set at approximately u0080450 million yearly, of which u0080150 million are due to medical expenses and damage to property, whereas u0080300 million represent loss earnings and foregone production. If one also takes into account the indirect costs of cross-border road traffic accidents, namely the physical and psychological consequences for victims and their relatives, the total economic impact of those accidents amounts to about u00801.04 billion annually. Several cross-border road traffic accidents create a risk of undercompensation of the non-resident victim, due to differences in the standard of living as well as in the calculation of the quantum of damages in member states. The problem of victims' undercompensation in the event of a cross-border traffic accident has so far been approached mostly under the aegis of the proposed harmonisation of European Tort Law, especially within the debate on the 'Rome II' regulation on non-contractual obligations. Already during first reading, the European Parliament proposed to address this issue by mandating the application of the law of habitual residence of the victim when assessing the quantum of damage awards. [Andrea Renda, Lorna Schrefler] |
Author: Renda, Andrea |
Series Title:European Parliament - Study |
Publisher: Europäische Union / Europäisches Parlament |
Year: 2007 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: PE. 378.304 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: compensation (law)cross border cooperationvictimtraffic accident |
Subject: International cooperationTraffic. Transport safetyMoney. Financing |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäisches Parlament (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/) |
Title: An Analysis of the Commission Communications on Future Development of Frontex and the Creation of a European Border Surveillance System (eurosur) |
---|
Abstract On 13 February 2008, the European Commission tabled a border package, consisting of three communications1. dealing with the issue of EU external border management. Two of these documents, namely the communication on the evaluation and future development of Frontex2. and the communication on the creation of a European border surveillance system (Eurosur)3. propose significant evolutions with regard the role of the Frontex agency and the orientations of the EU integrated border management (IBM) concept. The evaluation of Frontex elaborated by the Commission services is timely: since the beginning of its operational phase in 2005, the agency has considerably developed its activities in all its domains of competence, and the EC subsidy to its budget has more than tripled over the period 2006-2008. The evaluation, however, falls short of critically assessing the consistence of Frontex activities with the fundamental values upheld by the EU. In this regard, it seems important to recall that Frontex is a first-pillar, Community body, which should not only respect the EU fundamental values in its activities, but also work for their promotion, particularly in a field which touches upon critical questions related to migration and freedom of movement.[European Parliament] |
Author: Jeandoez, Julien |
Series Title:European Parliament - Briefing Paper |
Publisher: Europäische Union / Europäisches Parlament |
Year: 2008 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: PE 408.295 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Arbeitspapiere, Preprints |
Keyword: border regionborder protectioncross border cooperationillegal immigration |
Subject: International relationsFrontiersForeign policy |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäisches Parlament (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/) |
Title: Delivering Education across Borders in the European Union . Final Report : Implementing Framework Service Contract EAC 02/2010 (lot 3) And Specific Contract EAC/2012/0152 |
---|
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Bildung und Kultur |
Contributer: Bertelsmann Stiftung |
Year: 2013 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: educational programEuropecross border cooperation |
Subject: Educational policy. Training policy |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: http://ec.europa.eu |
Title: Study on Conferring executive powers on Border Officers Operating at the External borders of the EU |
---|
Title (other): Study to examine the possibility of preparing a legal instrument in order to confer executive powers on officers operating at the external borders of one of the countries under consideration or in the context of return enforcement : Final report |
Abstract This document presents the results of the Study on the powers of border officers carried out by Unisys for the Directorate General Justice, Freedom and Security of the European Commission. This study has for objective to assess the situation in the 25 EU Member States, Norway, Iceland and Switzerland with respect to the possibility of conferring executive powers on border officers invited to operate at the external EU borders of another state or in the context of joint return enforcement. From there it draws suggestions for possible actions to increase the level of involvement of guest officers to contribute to an integrated management of the external borders.Basic information for this study has been collected through desktop research, face to face interviews with the competent authorities of the 28 involved States and contributions from experts involved in the project, as well as representatives from the European Agency for the management of the external borders (FRONTEX). It was conducted under the supervision of and in coordination with DG JLS.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents 1 Management Summary 1.1 Study Objectives 1.2 Border Management 1.3 Common EU legal basis and strategy 1.4 Common instruments 1.5 Approved Action plan, still to apply 1.6 Study Findings 1.7 Need for improvement 1.8 Recommendations 2 Introduction to the study 2.1 Description of the study and main objectives 2.2 Context of the study 2.3 Study methodology 3 Powers of border guards 33.1 Section summary 3.2 Chain of prerogatives 3.3 Border control services 3.4 Executive powers per country 4 Operations in other countries 4.1 Section summary 4.2 Border control and return 4.3 Other examples of cooperation 5 Comparative analysis of legal rules 5.1 Section summary 5.2 German approach 5.3 Requirement of international agreement 5.4 Pros and cons 5.5 Analysis per specific executive power 6 Assessment of requirements and barriers 6.1 Section summary 6.2 Synoptic table 6.3 Typology of legal requirements 6.4 Requirement of nationality 6.5 Language requirement 6.6 Constitutional Conferment of executive powers 6.7 Specific provisions concerning the exercise of executive powers by national officers abroad 6.8 Other requirements 6.9 Legal analysis within the Community context 7 Need for improvement 7.1 Section summary 7.2 Need for a legal basis 7.3 Solidarity vs Subsidiarity 7.4 Recommendations 8 Conclusions 9 Bibliography 10 Annexes 10.1 CD-ROM 10.2 Study framework and methodology 10.3 Overview of main border control services per country 10.4 Border Control cooperation between the US and Canada 10.5 Glossary 10.6 Table of Acronyms 10.7 Table on Public Authority Tasks 10.8 Overview of agreements |
Author (Corp. Body): Unisys |
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Inneres |
Year: 2006 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: EUborder protectioncross border cooperation |
Subject: FrontiersEuropean Community law in general |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: European Neighbourhood & Partnership Instrument : Cross-Border Cooperation ; Strategy Paper 2007-2013 ; Indicative Programme 2007-2010 |
---|
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission |
Year: 2007 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: EUcross border cooperationneighborhood help |
Subject: European Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Evaluation to support the preparation of pre-accession financial instruments beyond 2013 : Final Report |
---|
Abstract This is the Final Report for the forward-looking evaluation on the future pre-accession financial instrument beyond 2013, commissioned by Directorate-General for Enlargement (DG ELARG) of the European Commission (EC). The work was carried out between December 2010 and May 2011 by the European Policy Evaluation Consortium (EPEC), and led by the EPEC grouping member GHK with support from EPEC partner Technopolis. The work has been undertaken under the guidance of a Reference Group chaired by DG ELARG and including representatives of other DGs of the Commission.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents List of acronyms Executive summary 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose of the report and study objectives 1.2 The EUs enlargement policy 1.3 Past EU support to the pre-accession process 1.4 The Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance 1.5 Method 1.6 Structure of the report 2 The problems addressed 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Problem 1: The need to realise the benefits of enlargement 2.3 Problem 2: Gap between the conditions in candidate countries and potential candidates and those in the EU 2.4 Problem 3: Lack of readiness to implement EU programmes and related obligations 2.5 Problem 4: Challenges in the current implementation arrangements for IPA 3 The baseline scenario 2013-2018 and the European added value of a future programme ... 4 Policy objectives ... 5 Policy options ... 6 Assessment of alternative policy options ... 7 Key modifications to the delivery of IPA considered ... 8 Monitoring and evaluation arrangements ... Annexes Annex 1 Path towards EU Membership Annex 2 Background on beneficiaries ... Annex 3 Pre-accession programmes prior to IPA ... Annex 4 Component structure and delivery mechanisms of IPA Annex 5 The findings of the online consultations ... Annex 6 The benefits of enlargement and costs of non-enlargement Annex 7 Beneficiary development trends Annex 8 Detailed budget assumptions of the policy options Annex 9 Draft intervention logic |
Author (Corp. Body): GHK | Technopolis | European Policy Evaluation Consortium |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung |
Year: 2011 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: evaluationdemocratizationEUjoining of the European Unionfinancial assistanceaffirmative actioncross border cooperationassistance human capitalinstitutionrural developmentregional development |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesIcelandSoutheastern Europe, Balkan peninsula. General ResourcesTurkey |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Study on the implementation of the European Information Exchange Model (EIXM) for strengthening law enforcement cooperation : Final Report |
---|
Abstract Smooth and secure cross-border information exchanges between law enforcement authorities are essential in order to ensure a high level of security in the EU and tackle serious and organised crime, as well as other offences that require cross-border collaboration. In order to ensure timely access to accurate and up-to-date data for law enforcement authorities, a considerable number of EU instruments and systems have been put in place in recent years, which are also supplemented by international and bilateral arrangements. The purpose of the study was to provide a follow up to the Commissions 2012 Communication on the European Information Exchange Model (EIXM Communication), to survey and assess activities carried out in Member States in this context as well as point to possible ways of further improvement. [Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents Executive summary 1 Introduction 2 Scope and methodology of the study 2.1 Scope of the study 2.2 Our methodology 3 Context 3.1 EIXM the rationale 3.2 EIXM the legal and policy underpinning 3.3 EIXM the legal instruments 3.4 EIXM the processes and practical aspects of information exchange 4 The implementation of the European Information Exchange Model (EIXM) 4.1 Implementation of the legal instruments 4.2 Processes and practical aspects of information exchange 4.3 Horizontal challenges of EIXM Annexes Annex 1: Analytical Framework Annex 2: Interview guides Annex 3: Glossary of terms 3List of figures Figure 2: The different layers of a SPOC List of tables Table 1: Instruments of information management currently in place Table 2: Main channels for the cross -border exchange of law enforcement information Table 3: Evolution of Prüm implementation (2012- 2014) Table 4: Application of the SPOC Guidelines criteria in the Member States |
Author: Doherty, Richard | Vandresse, Benoît | Kamarás, Éva |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Migration und Inneres | Deloitte |
Year: 2015 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: data exchangeEUcross border cooperationinformation exchangeinformation systemjudiciarycorruptioncriminality organized crimepolice |
Subject: European Community treaties and agreementsPublic administration. Executive powerAdministration of justiceVarious information networks and systems |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Technical Study on Smart Borders : Final Report |
---|
Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Objective 1.2 Scope 2. METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH 2.1. Overall approach 2.2. Analysis criteria 2.3. Options analysis 2.4. Basic assumptions 2.5. Relevant sources of law 3. EES AND RTP - BORDER CONTROL PROCESSES 3.1. ... 4. USE OF BIOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS 4.1. ... 5. DATA 5.1. ... 6. ARCHITECTURE 6.1. ... 7. STATISTICS AND FORECASTS 7.1. ... 8. CONCLUSIONS 8.1. ... 9. OPTIONS FOR THE PILOT APPENDIX A. - APPENDIX K... |
Author (Corp. Body): pwc |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Inneres |
Publisher: Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen, Luxemburg |
Year: 2014 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978-92-79-41798-6 | DR-01-14-990-EN-N |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: data processingEUborder protectioncross border cooperationillegal immigrationinformation exchangetourist traffic |
Subject: FrontiersEuropean Community law in generalInformation transferElectronic data processing |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Study on obstacles to cooperation and information-sharing among Forensic Science Laboratories and other relevant bodies of different Member States and between these and counterparts in Third Countries : Contract JLS/D1/2007/025 ; Final Report |
---|
Author: Gill, Richard |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz, Freiheit und Sicherheit | European Network of Forensic Science Institutes | EUROJUST |
Year: 2008 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract JLS/D1/2007/025 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: third countriesEUforensic medicinecross border cooperationinformation exchangecooperation |
Subject: European Community law in general |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Study on consumers decision making in insurance services : a behavioural economics perspective ; Final report |
---|
Title (other): Study on consumers decision making in insurance services : a behavioural economics perspective ; Executive Summary | Study on consumers decision making in insurance services : a behavioural economics perspective ; Annexes to the Final Report | Study on consumers decision making in insurance services : a behavioural economics perspective ; Final report Country fiches |
Abstract The study had a threefold objective: Collecting data and evidence, testing a range of remedies to improve consumer decision-making and interest in cross-border offers, and estimating savings consumers could make. The preparatory phase involved the collection of qualitative and quantitative evidence on both demand for and supply of insurance and explored barriers and drivers of cross-border purchases, to support the design of the experimental phase; it consisted of desk-based research, stakeholder interviews, and focus groups. Task 2 involved a consumer survey conducted in conjunction with behavioural experiments, to provide quantitative evidence on consumers experiences in the market, the impact of contract features and the presentation of information on consumers decision-making, the interplay between contract features and behavioural traits, and consumers interest in and barriers to purchasing insurance cross-border. In particular, the experiments tested the effectiveness of remedies to improve consumer decision-making. The survey examined respondents behavioural characteristics, experience, and comprehension. Task 3 used the data and evidence collected to estimate potential savings for consumers that better choices may allow for the products studied. The study conclusions and recommendations address a number of general and cross-border insurance issues, such as the provision of information to consumers, the purchasing process, and levels of awareness and understanding.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents ABSTRACT INTRODUCTION AND RESEARCH OBJECTIVES 1. INTRODUCTION AND RESEARCH OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY 1.1. Countries covered in the study 1.2. Products covered in the study METHODOLOGY 2. SUMMARY OF THE RESEARCH METHODS USED TO INFORM THIS STUDY 2.1. Desk-based research 2.2. Stakeholder interviews 2.3. Focus groups 2.4. Online experiment and survey 2.5. Design of the laboratory experiment and survey 2.6. Approach to measuring potential savings consumers could make EVIDENCE AND FINDINGS 3. FEATURES OF THE NON-LIFE INSURANCE MARKET 3.1. Non-life insurance market data 3.2. Insurers practices and distribution channels 3.3. Cross-border selling 4. CONSUMER DECISION-MAKING IN THE NON-LIFE INSURANCE MARKET 4.1. The consumer decision-making framework 4.2. Insights into consumer decision-making from behavioural economics 4.3. Situations in which consumers decide to buy or renew insurance 4.4. Finding and using information when shopping for insurance 4.5. Consumers preferred sales channels 4.6. Consumers use of insurance post-sale 4.7. Factors potentially leading to problems with consumer decision-making 5. EFFECTIVENESS OF REMEDIES IN HELPING CONSUMERS TO MAKE BETTER DECISIONS 5.1. Remedies that have been proposed or put in place 5.2. Effectiveness of remedies 5.3. Note on the analysis methodology 6. FACTORS THAT LIMIT CROSS-BORDER INSURANCE PURCHASES 6.1. Main factors limiting cross-border insurance purchases 6.2. Interventions to increase cross-border demand 7. POTENTIAL SAVINGS CONSUMERS COULD MAKE 7.1. Assessment of potential premium savings 7.2. Assessment of potentially higher claims pay-outs 7.3. Further assessment of potential savings CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 8.1. Conclusions 8.2. Policy recommendations 9. BIBLIOGRAPHY Tables Figures | Annexes INTRODUCTION ANNEXES RELATING TO TASK 1 1. ANNEX 1: APPROACH TO THE DESK-BASED RESEARCH 1.1. Literature review 1.2. Market data collection 2. ANNEX 2: APPROACH TO THE STAKEHOLDER INTERVIEWS 2.1. Preliminary list of stakeholders 2.2. Preparation ahead of the interviewing process 2.3. Interviews at Member State level 2.4. Interviews with stakeholders at EU level 2.5. Full list of stakeholders interviewed and interview dates 2.6. Stakeholder interview guides 3. ANNEX 3: COUNTRY CASE STUDY GUIDELINES 4. ANNEX 4: APPROACH TO THE FOCUS GROUPS 4.1. Design of the focus group research 4.2. Sampling and recruitment 4.3. Discussion guide 4.4. Focus group recruitment screening questions ANNEXES RELATING TO TASK 2 ONLINE COMPONENT 5. ANNEX 5: DESIGN OF THE ONLINE EXPERIMENTAND SURVEY 5.1. Sample sizes 5.2. Components of the experiment and survey 5.3. Structure of the contract choice task 5.4. Treatments 5.5. Incentive structure 5.6. Incorporation of findings from Task 1 and the pilot into the experimental design 6. ANNEX 6: DESIGN OF OFFERS IN THE CONTRACT CHOICE TASK 6.1. Offers home insurance 6.2. Offer motor insurance 6.3. Car rental insurance 6.4. Add-on insurance 7. ANNEX 7: SURVEY AND EXPERIMENT SCRIPT 7.1. Introduction to the Survey 7.2. Socio-demographics (D1) 7.3. Cognitive ability and behavioural characteristics (S3) 7.4. Allocation to products and treatments 7.5. Incentives and introduction to the experiment task 7.6. Choice task 7.7. Comprehension and awareness questions (S4) 7.8. Experience with non-life insurance 7.9. Identifying cross-border oriented consumers 7.10. Questions on interest in and potential obstacles of cross-border insurance purchases 8. ANNEX 8: INCENTIVE STRUCTURE | 9. ANNEX 9: ONLINE EXPERIMENT SAMPLE SIZE CONSIDERATIONS 9.1. Impact of sample size on representativeness 9.2. Impact of sample size on the precision of estimates ANNEXES RELATING TO TASK 2 LABORATORY COMPONENT 10. ANNEX 10: DESIGN OF THE LABORATORY EXPERIMENT AND SURVEY 10.1. Laboratory experiment discussion guide 11. ANNEX 11: LABORATORY EXPERIMENT SAMPLE SIZE CONSIDERATIONS 11.1. Products to be tested in the laboratory environment 11.2. Contextual factors and treatments to be tested 11.3. Rationale for including one product instead of two in the choice task 11.4. Combing the online and laboratory experiment data 11.5. Including further products in the laboratory follow-up questions FURTHER ANALYSIS, RESULTS AND TECHNICAL INFORMATION 12. ANNEX 12: ASSESSMENT OF POTENTIAL PREMIUMSAVINGS USING SURVEY DATA 13. ANNEX 13: SHARES WHO GAVE EACH AVAILABLE ANSWER TO EACH SURVEY QUESTION 14. ANNEX 14: WEIGHTING FACTORS AND TARGET SHARES FOR GENDER, AGE AND REGION |
Author (Corp. Body): London Economics | Ipsos | VVA Europe |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Verbraucher |
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Veröffentlichungen |
Year: 2017 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Specific contract No 2014 85 08 | Implementing Framework Contract EAHC/2011/CP/01/LE | 978-92-9200-749-2 | EB-01-17-059-EN-N | 978-92-9200-750-8 | EB-17-01-060-EN-N |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: servicedecision makingEUcross border cooperationconsumerconsumer protectioninsuranceinsurance benefit |
Subject: European Community law in generalConsumption. Consumer protectionInsurance. Insurance risks |
Countries Scheme: Germany. General ResourcesEurope. General ResourcesSwedenLatviaSlovak Republic RomaniaItalySpainFranceUnited KingdomLuxembourg |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Impact of information on patients choice within the context of the Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on the application of patients rights in cross-border healthcare : Final Report |
---|
Abstract The Executive Agency for Consumers, Health and Food (CHAFEA), acting on behalf of the European Commission (DG SANCO) commissioned Ipsos and London Economics to undertake a study into the impact of information on patients choice in the context of Directive 2011/24/EU of the European Parliament and the Council on the application of patients rights in cross-border healthcare.The study is divided into two phases: Phase I is based on a controlled online experiment and survey undertaken in eight Member States which investigated the impact of information on respondents choice to seek healthcare cross-border in the EU. Phase I also included a survey of payers. In Phase II a shortened version of the Phase I experiment was implemented along with a survey that asked respondents questions about their experience on the National Contact Point websites.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents Glossary Executive summary 1 Introduction 1.1 Objective 1.2 Phase I method 1.3 Survey of citizens and doctors 1.4 Payer survey 1.5 Literature review 1.6 Behavioural experiment 1.7 Design of choice experiment 1.8 Phase II method 2 Literature review Phase I 2.1 Overview of cross-border healthcare provision 2.2 Country-level evidence 3 Payer survey Phase I 3.1 Directive 2011/24/EU and cross-border patient care 3.2 The content of National Contact Point websites 4 Consumer and doctor survey Phase I 4.1 Previous experience of cross-border medical treatment 4.2 Destination of previous cross-border travel for medical treatment 4.3 Reasons for travelling cross-border for medical treatment 4.4 Potential reasons for travelling cross-border for medical treatment 4.5 Confidence in healthcare systems 4.6 Recommendations for cross-border travel 5 Drivers of cross-border patient choice Phase I 5.1 Price 5.2 Waiting time 5.3 Trust 5.4 Language 6 National Contact Point visitor questionnaire Phase II 6.1 Reasons for visiting the National Contact Points 6.2 How easy it was to find information on the NCP websites 6.3 How helpful the information was 7 Drivers of cross-border patient choice Phase II 7.1 The effect of price on choice of cross-border healthcare 7.2 The effect of waiting time on choice of cross-border healthcare 7.3 The effect of price and waiting time 7.4 Effect of complexity of information framing on choice 8 Conclusions and recommendations References Annex 1 Survey of citizens and doctors Phase I Annex 2 NCP Visitor questionnaire Phase II Annex 3 Invitation screens NCP visitor questionnaire Phase II Annex 4 Regression results Phase I and II Annex 5 Confidence in national healthcare systems Phase I Tables, Figures and Boxes |
Author (Corp. Body): London Economics | Ipsos |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agency |
Year: 2014 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: EUhealth policyhealth carecross border cooperationinformation processpatient law |
Subject: Medical care. Health control |
Countries Scheme: Germany. General ResourcesEurope. General ResourcesDenmarkFinlandSwedenEstoniaPoland Czech RepublicHungarySloveniaItalySpain |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
« Previous
Next »