Suche nach Schlagworten '00227179'

9 entries found on 1 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 9

Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),

« Previous
Next »
Title: Mind the gap ? Women?s and men?s quality of work and employment - Background paper
Abstract
Gender mainstreaming is an integral part of the research conducted by the European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions. When labour market participation, working conditions and the resulting labour market outcomes are analysed, the difference in the situation of women and men is evident. This report highlights the main issues concerning women's situation in the labour market and indicate where the principal barriers to women's labour market participation lie. [Author vide Copyright]
Publisher: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions
Year: 2008
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Arbeitspapiere, Preprints
Keyword: Women's wagesworking conditionsequal opportunitygainful employment of womengender mainstreaming
Subject: Equal opportunitiesLabourConditions of work
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions (http://eurofound.europa.eu)
Title: Mainstreaming Human Rights and Gender into European Security and Defence Policy : Compilation of relevant documents
Table of Contents
Foreword
I. Introduction to EU Human Rights Policy (Excerpt Annual Report 2007)
II. Human Rights Reference Documents
A - Mainstreaming of Human Rights into ESDP (doc. 11936/4/06)
B - Human Rights Advice on the Aceh Monitoring Mission (doc.11678/1/05)
C - Examples : extracts from planning/lessons learned documents
D - Overview of ratifications of UN instruments
III. Gender Reference Documents
A - Council Conclusions on Gender Mainstreaming (doc. 14779/06)
B - Checklist on Gender Mainstreaming (doc. 12068/06)
C - Implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 1325 (doc. 11932/2/05)
D - Examples : extracts from planning/lessons learned documents
IV. Children and Armed Conflict
A - EU Guidelines on Children Affected by Armed Conflict (doc. 10019/08)
B - Checklist on Children Affected by Armed Conflict (doc. 9822/08)
C - Examples : extracts from planning/lessons learned documents
V. International Humanitarian Law
A - EU Guidelines on Promoting Compliance with International Humanitarian Law (doc. 15246/05)
B - Examples : extracts from planning/lessons learned documents
VI. Transitional Justice
Draft document on Transitional Justice and ESDP (doc. 10674/06)
VII. Standards of Behaviour
A - Generic Standards of Behaviour for ESDP Operations (doc. 8373/3/05)
B – Examples : extracts from planning/lessons learned documents
VIII. Protection of Civilians
A - PSC Working Document (doc. 14805/03)
B – Examples : extracts from planning/lessons learned documents
IX. Civil Society
A - EU Guidelines on Human Rights Defenders (doc. 10056/1/04 REV1)
B - Enhancing Cooperation with NGOs and CSOs in the framework of EU civilian crisis management and conflict prevention (doc. 15574/1/06)
C - Examples : extracts from planning/lessons learned documents
Reference Documents, Websites and Contacts
List of Abbreviations
Author (Corp. Body): Rat der Europäischen Union / Generalsekretariat
Year: 2008
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978-92-824-2379-0 | QC-80-08-342-EN-C
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EUgender mainstreaminghuman rightssecurity policypolicy on income distribution
Subject: DefenceHuman rightsEqual opportunities
Countries Scheme: Global ResourcesEurope. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Rat der Europäischen Union (http://www.consilium.europa.eu/)
Title: Commission staff working document: Mid-term review of the Strategy for equality between women and men (2010-2015) :
SWD(2013) 339 final
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Substantial progress across all priority areas since 2010
3. Looking forward 2013-2015
4. Gender mainstreaming as an integral part of the Strategy
5. Conclusions
6. Annex 1: Actions implemented between 2010 and 2012 listed by priority area
7. Annex 2: Actions to be implemented between 2013 and 2015 listed by priority area
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz
Publisher: Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen, Luxemburg
Year: 2013
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: SWD(2013) 339 final
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: equal rights lawequal opportunityEUwomansalarygender mainstreamingviolenceequality of treatment
equality of rightsman
Subject: European Community law in generalEqual opportunitiesWorking condititions. Work organization
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of EU Support to Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in Partner Countries : Final Report ; Volume 1:
Main Report
Title (other): Evaluation of EU Support to Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in Partner Countries : Final Report ; Volume 2 :
Annexes 1 to 12 | Evaluation of EU Support to Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in Partner Countries : Final
Report ; Volume 3: Country Notes | Fiche contradictoire : Evaluation of the EU Support to Gender Equality and Women’s
Empowerment in Partner Countries | Evaluation of EU Support to Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment in Partner
Countries : Executive Summary
Abstract
This final report presents the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Evaluation of European Union (EU) Support to Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment (GEWE) in Partner Countries, commissioned by the Evaluation Unit of the Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development (DG DEVCO).The objectives of the evaluation are: (a) to provide the relevant external cooperation services of the EU, Member States, the EU Parliament and the wider public with an overall independent assessment of the EU’s past and current support to GEWE in partner countries; and (b) to identify key lessons, assess results thus far, and to produce strategic, operational and forward-looking recommendations in order to improve current and future EU and Member State strategies, programmes and actions.The evaluation focuses on gender mainstreaming in EU development cooperation, as called for in the EU Plan of Action on Gender Equality and Women’s Empowerment 2010–15 (GAP). In particular the evaluation focuses on how gender mainstreaming has been implemented by the European Commission Services (EC Services), the European External Action Services (EEAS) and two Member States (MS), the Netherlands and Spain. The evaluation assesses also the extent to which EU/EC cooperation (policy, strategies, programmes/projects) has been relevant, efficient and effective in supporting sustainable impacts on GEWE in partner countries in the period 2007–13.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Acronyms
Executive Summary
Introduction
Overall assessment
Conclusions
Recommendations
Note 1: How the EU can utilise international gender datasets
Linking to the Sustainable Development Goals
What the EU can learn from others
What the EU needs to do
Note 2: How to evaluate gender equality
International experiences in evaluating gender equality
A framework for evaluating gender equality
Section 1: Introduction
Purpose of the evaluation
Temporal, geographic and thematic scope
The context of EU support to gender equality and women’s empowerment
The Member States
This report
Section 2: Methodological Approach
General approach
The evaluation questions
Evaluation methodology
Section 3: Main Findings and Analysis
Main findings of the mapping
Part 1: Gender mainstreaming in EU development cooperation
Part 2: Thematic evaluation of the European Commission
Section 4: Conclusions
Overall assessment
Conclusions
Section 5: Recommendations
List of figures
List of tables
| Annex 1: Terms of Reference
Annex 2: Evaluation Questions, Judgement Criteria, Indicators and Data Sources
Annex 3: International and EU policy context
Annex 4: Detailed Intervention Logic for Gender Mainstreaming and Support to GEWE
Annex 5: Methodology for Country Visits
Annex 6: Mapping
Annex 7: CSP and RSP Analysis for EC and Member States
Annex 8: Analysis of EUD Cooperation Strategies Mid Term Reviews and Country and Regional Evaluations
Annex 9: Findings from EU Delegation Survey
Annex 10: List of People Met during the Evaluation
Annex 11: Biblography
Annex 12: Programmes and Projects Reviewed
| Country Note for Afghanistan
Country Note for Armenia
Country Note for Bolivia
Country Note for Burkina Faso
Compte Rendu Pays–le Burkina Faso
Country Note for the Democratic Republic of Congo
Country Note for Ethiopia
Country Note for Haiti
Country Note for Morocco
Compte rendu pays–le Maroc
Country Note for Nicaragua
Country Note for Papua New Guinea
Country Note for Philippines
Author: Watkins, Francis
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Internationale Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung, Brüssel | COWI AS | itad | ADE / Analysis for economic decisions
Year: 2015
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract EVA 2011 (129907/C/SER/multi) – Lot 2 | Specific contract N° – 2013/ 319463
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationdevelopment aid policyEUwomangender mainstreamingequality of rightscooperation
Subject: Development aid. Aid programmes and aid organizationsEuropean Community external relationsEqual opportunities
Countries Scheme: Global ResourcesEurope. General ResourcesSpainNetherlandsHaiti
NicaraguaBoliviaMoroccoEthiopiaBurkina FasoRepublic of the CongoArmeniaAfghanistanPhilippinesPapua New Guinea
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Country Level Evaluation Republic of Malawi : Final Report ; Volume 1: Main Report
Title (other): Country Level Evaluation Republic of Malawi : Final Report ; Volume 2: Annexes | Fiche Contradictoire : Evaluation of
the Commission’s support to Malawi | Quality Grid : CLE Malawi ; Final Report, Oct 2011 | Evaluation of the European
Commission's Co-operation with the Republic of Malawi : Country Level Evaluation ; EVINFO
Abstract
This evaluation of the European Commission?s (EC) co-operation with Malawi was carried out in 2010 and 2011. The main objectives of the evaluation were provision of an independent assessment to the Commission of the EU and to the wider public of the Commission`s past and current co-operation relations with Malawi and to identify key lessons in order to improve the current and future strategies and programmes of the Commission of the EU.The evaluation covers co-operation strategies and implementation including a mix of all activities and modalities during the period 2003-2010 (implementation of the European Development Fund (EDF8 & EDF9, and programming of EDF10). During this period the support of the Commission included focal sectors (regional development, agriculture and food security, regional inter-connection – local and regional road transport), non-focal sectors (support to trade and investment, fight against HIV/AIDS and governance (civic education, justice and support to Non-State Actors) and cross-cutting issues (including environment, sustainability and gender issues).[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
5.10 Choice of EC aid modalities contributing to the efficiency of EC support
6. Conclusions
6.1 Primary conclusions
6.2 Complementary (supporting) conclusions
6.2.1 Issues arising from and impacting on preparation and implementation of SWAps and budget support (PC1)
6.2.2 Management of modalities (PC2)
6.2.3 Aspects of governance (PC3)
6.2.4 Complementarity and coordination
6.2.5 Regional integration (PC5)
6.2.6 Cross-cutting issues
6.2.7 Agriculture and food security
7. Recommendations
7.1 Improving implementation effectiveness and sustainability
7.2 Maximising the impacts of SWAps and budget support
7.3 Management of modalities
7.4 Aspects of governance
7.5 Regional integration
7.6 Cross-cutting issues
7.7 Agriculture and food security
| Volume I- Main Report
1. Introduction
1.1 Origin and Objectives of the Evaluation
1.2 Scope of the Evaluation
1.3 Purpose and Structure of the Draft Final Report
2. Methodology of the Evaluation
2.1 Evaluation Questions, Judgement Criteria and Indicators
2.2 Data Collection
2.3 Data Reliability and Analysis
2.4 Difficulties, Limitations (and Mitigation Measures)
3. EC- Malawi Co-operation Context
3.1 Broad Characteristics of Malawi
3.2 Political and Institutional Situation
3.3 Economy, Commerce and Private Sector
3.4 Governance
3.5 Malawi?s Development Strategies
3.6 Development Assistance
4. EC Strategy and Intervention Logic
4.1 General Framework and Principles of the EC co-operation
4.2 EC Intervention Logic
4.2.1 Evolution of EC Strategy and Support
4.2.2 EDF9
4.2.3 EDF10
4.3 Implementation
4.3.1 Budget Support
4.3.2 Focal Areas
4.3.3 Non-Focal Areas
4.3.4 Cross-Cutting Issues
5. Answers to Evaluation Questions
5.1 Response to the changing needs of the Malawian population and those expressed by GoM
5.2 EC contribution to agriculture-led economic growth
5.3 EC contribution to food security
5.4 Contribution of EC support to sector management of a road network that provides appropriate service levels
5.5 Contribution of EC support to the road sector for improved regional connectivity
5.6 Contribution of EC support to capacity building in trade negotiations and related reforms to regional integration
5.7 EC budget support and associated policy dialogue?s contribution to stabilising the external and fiscal balances
5.8 EC budget support contribution to improving PFM and to orienting budgetary priorities and actual expenditures towards poverty reduction
5.9 Contribution of EC support to Rule of Law (civic education and justice) and NSAs to increased participation and oversight of civic society in governmental and parliamentary decision-making processes
| Volume 2 – Annexes
1. EVALUATION MATRICES
2. INTERVENTION LOGICS
3. ACTIVITIES OF THE FIELD PHASE
4. SYNTHESIS PHASE
5. PROJECT INVENTORY
6. LIST OF PERSONS INTERVIEWED
7. FOCUS GROUP FICHES
8. ACTIVITY SCHEDULE OF FIELD PHASE
9. WORK PLAN
10. COUNTRY INFORMATION
11. EC STRATEGY AND INTERVENTION LOGIC
12. MALAWI’S PROGRESS TOWARDS ACHIEVING THE MDGS
13. BIBLIOGRAPHY
14. PROJECT FICHES
15. DISSEMINATION SEMINAR SEPTEMBER 29TH, 2011 – MINUTES
16. DISSEMINATION SEMINAR – PRESENTATION
17. TOR
Author (Corp. Body): ECO Consult
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Arbeitsgemeinschaft Entwicklungspolitischer Gutachter | APRI | Euronet | Institut de Recherches dApplications des Me?thodes de De?veloppement,
Year: 2011
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract No EVA 2007/geo-acp
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: AIDSevaluationdevelopment aidEUEuropean Commissiongender mainstreaminggovernancecommerce
investmentcooperationagricultureMalawisustainable developmentfoodregional developmentroad trafficenvironment
Subject: Development aid. Aid programmes and aid organizationsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesMalawi
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Joint Evaluation of the Cooperation of the European Commission, Belgium, Denmark, France and Luxembourg with Niger
between 2000 - 2008 : Final report ; Volume 1 – Main report ; Second revised edition
Title (other): Evaluation conjointe de la cooperation de la Commission Europeenne, de la Belgique, du Danemark, de la France et du
Luxembourg avec le Niger 2000-2008 : Rapport final ; Volume 2 - Annexes | Annexe 3 – Logiques d'intervention |
Evaluation conjointe de la cooperation de la Commission Europeenne, de la Belgique, du Danemark, de la France et du
Luxembourg avec le Niger 2000-2008 : Rapport final ; Annexe 7 - Rapports sectoriels et thématiques | Evaluation
conjointe de la cooperation de la Commission Europeenne, de la Belgique, du Danemark, de la France et du Luxembourg avec
le Niger 2000-2008 : Rapport final ; Volume 1 – Rapport principal | Evaluation conjointe de la coopération de la
Commission européenne, de la Belgique, du Danemark, de la France et du Luxembourg avec le Niger - 2000 à 2008 : Ref.
1278 ; EVINFO
Abstract
In 2007, five donors (European Commission, Belgium, Denmark, France and Luxembourg) decided to work together to evaluate their cooperation with Niger over the 2000-2008 period. Together, the five Donors taking part in the evaluation (DPE) accounted for more than half the Official Development Assistance (ODA) delivered to Niger over the period.Because it is a joint evaluation, specific aspects had to be taken into account: the aim was not to assess the individual performance of each DPE but to analyse the conception, implementation and effects of their joint action. Two analytical frameworks have been used to achieve this:An analysis of the implementation of the Paris Declaration Commitments, focusing on the cooperation process, and the relationship between the aid partners in particular (DPE-Government on the one hand, between DPEs on the other).The evaluation criteria of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC), which help assess the collective performance of DPEs by analysing their aims, resources, achievements, results and impacts.The evaluation is structured on the basis of these two analysis frameworks. It deals with the strategic cooperation frameworks between each DPE and the Government of Niger, as well as their priorities and interventions in a selection of sectors (rural development, water and sanitation, transport, culture, craft industry, health, education and training, macroeconomic support), taking into account cross-cutting issues (regional development, environment, gender issues, demographics and youth issues). The evaluation is also based on an extensive document review, field visits to selected sites in Niger, and on a survey about the perception of development aid in Niger, led concomitantly by the Laboratory for the Study and Research on Social Dynamics and Local Development (LASDEL). [Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
LIST OF ACRONYMS
SUMMARY
1. MANDATE OF THE EVALUATION
1.1. A joint evaluation
1.2. Scope of evaluation1.3. Evaluation monitoring
1.4. Parallel perception survey by LASDEL
2. METHODOLOGY
2.1. Strengths of the evaluation
2.2. Weaknesses of the evaluation
3. DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES IN NIGER
3.1. Geography and climate
3.1.1. A vast, land-locked country bordered by Nigeria
3.1.2. A harsh, instable and deteriorating agro-climatic context
3.2. Population and poverty
3.2.1. One of the highest population growth rates in the world
3.2.2. Chronic food insecurity
3.2.3. One of the poorest populations in the world, facing a worsening situation
3.2.4. Rural economy in permanent crisis
3.2.5. Mining products, an asset which is still not used to its full potential
3.2.6. A very low level of education
3.2.7. Less developed migration trends than in some other Sahelian countries
3.2.8. Niger belongs to a solid monetary area... Is it too solid?
3.2.9. Close economic integration with Nigeria and other coastal countries
3.2.10. Economic integration hindered by an insufficient transport network
3.3. The Nigerien State
3.3.1. The political stability experienced during the period of evaluation has recently been undermined
3.3.2. A decentralisation process which is still in its early stages and not very advanced
3.3.3. A better controlled State budget, but which still depends a lot on foreign aid
3.3.4. More formal policies
3.4. SWOT analysis
4. GOVERNMENT STRATEGIES AND DPE RESPONSES
4.1. Niger’s Poverty Reduction Strategy, a framework to adapt to development challenges
4.2. General strategies of the DPEs with Niger
4.2.1. Belgium
4.2.2. European Commission
4.2.3. France
4.2.4. Denmark
4.2.5. Luxembourg
4.3. Financial commitments of the DPEs in Niger
4.3.1. Weight of aid granted by DPEs in Niger
4.3.2. Regional distribution of aid by the DPEs in Niger
| 4.3.3. Sectoral distribution of aid by the DPEs in Niger
5. ANALYSIS
5.1. An approach based on 11 evaluation questions
5.2. Two complementary analysis frameworks
5.3. First analysis framework: Implementation of the Paris Declaration Commitments
5.3.1. Paris Declaration: implied hypotheses
5.3.2. The concept of cooperation area
5.3.3. The cooperation cycle
5.3.4. What deductions can be made regarding the Paris Declaration Commitments?
5.4. Second analysis framework: the DAC evaluation criteria
5.4.1. Relevance
5.4.2. Coherence
5.4.3. Effectiveness
5.4.4. Impact
5.4.5. Sustainability
5.4.6. Efficiency
6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
| Volume II: Annexes
ANNEXE 1. TERMES DE RÉFÉRENCE
ANNEXE 2. METHODOLOGIE ET CONCEPTS
ANNEXE 3. LOGIQUES D’INTERVENTION
ANNEXE 4. LES ENJEUX DE DEVELOPPEMENT DU NIGER
ANNEXE 5. ENGAGEMENTS FINANCIERS DES DPE AU NIGER : ANALYSE SECTORIELLE ET REGIONALE
ANNEXE 6. AUTRES COOPERATIONS SIGNIFICATIVES AU NIGER
ANNEXE 7. RAPPORTS SECTORIELS
ANNEXE 8. REPONSE AUX QUESTIONS D’EVALUATION
ANNEXE 9. FOCUS GROUPS ORGANISES DANS LE CADRE DE LA MISSION DE TERRAIN
ANNEXE 10. BIBLIOGRAPHIE
ANNEXE 11. MEMBRE DE L’EQUIPE DE CONSULTANTS ET DU COMITE DE GESTION
Author (Corp. Body): Société d’Etudes et d’Evaluation sarl
Contributer: Europäische Kommission | Belgien | Dänemark | Frankreich | Luxembourg | baastel | Institut de Recherches dApplications des Me?thodes de De?veloppement, Paris | Dnet Consult
Year: 2010
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Ref. 1278
Language: en | fr
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: trainingBelgiumevaluationeducationDenmarkdemographydevelopment aidEU
European CommissionFrancegender mainstreaminghealth policyhandicraft tradeyouth policycooperationculturerural developmentLuxembourg
macroeconomicsNigerenvironmental policytrafficeconomics of water supply and distribution
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesDenmarkBelgiumFranceLuxembourgNiger
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of the European Commission’s Co-operation with Malaysia : Final Report ; Volume 1
Title (other): Evaluation of European Commission’s Cooperation with Malaysia : Country Level Evaluation ; Final Report | Evaluation of
the European Commission’s Co-operation with Malaysia : Final Report ; Volume 2 | Fiche Contradictoire : Evaluation of
the European Commission's cooperation with Malaysia ; Country Level Evaluation | Quality Grid : Evaluation of EC
co-operation with Malaysia ; Final Report | Evaluation of the European Cooperation with Malaysia : Ref. 1265 ; EVINFO
Abstract
The main objectives of this evaluation are: (i) to provide an overall independent and accountable assessment of the European Commission’s cooperation relations with Malaysia during the 1997-2007 period, (ii) to identify lessons learnt from past cooperation in order to enhance the implementation of the current strategy and the preparation of future strategies. During the period 1997-2007, EC commitments in terms of bilateral co-operation amounted to approximately € 6.7 million, and disbursements totalled to € 6.05 million. An amount of € 3.5 million was decommitted in 2004.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
1 Introduction
2 Evaluation process and its limits
3 Background
3.1 EC CO-OPERATION CONTEXT
3.2 SOCIAL SECTORS
3.3 MAJOR CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES
3.4 EC STRATEGIC RESPONSE
3.5 OTHER ASSISTANCES AND COORDINATION
4 Findings
4.1 EQ1 - TO WHAT EXTENT HAVE THE COMMISSION'S INTERVENTIONS CONTRIBUTED TO IMPROVE TRADE AND ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP WITH MALAYSIA WHILE IMPROVING EC VISIBILITY?
4.2 EQ2 - TO WHAT EXTENT HAVE THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION'S INTERVENTIONS IN THE SECTOR OF HIGHER EDUCATION CONTRIBUTED TO INCREASE MUTUAL UNDERSTANDING AND AWARENESS?
4.3 EQ3 - TO WHAT EXTENT WERE THE EC PROGRAMMES IN THE COUNTRY CONSISTENT WITH THE GLOBAL OBJECTIVES OF EC RESPONSE TO GLOBAL CHALLENGES FACED BY ASEAN, PARTICULARLY ENVIRONMENT ISSUES?
4.4 EQ4 - TO WHAT EXTENT HAS EC MAINSTREAMING OF GENDER, GOVERNANCE AND HUMAN RIGHTS INTO ITS COOPERATION PROGRAMMES RESULTED IN ENHANCED GOVERNANCE IN THE COUNTRY?
4.5 EQ5 - TO WHAT EXTENT HAS THE EC ASSESSED AND CONSIDERED (I) THE GOVERNMENT’S PRIORITIES,(II) THE NEEDS OF THE COUNTRY AND,(III) THE EVOLVING CONTEXT IN PROGRAMMING ITS STRATEGIC RESPONSE, INCLUDING THE FOLLOW-UP OF THE IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY?
4.6 EQ6 - TO WHAT EXTENT WAS THE EC MIX OF INSTRUMENTS (REGIONAL AND THEMATIC BUDGET LINES), APPROACHES (FIDUCIARY FUNDS, PROJECT APPROACH, MACRO-LEVEL PROGRAMMES, SWAP),FINANCING MODALITIES (SPECIFIC PROCEDURES, BUDGET SUPPORT, JOINT FUNDING) AND/OR CHANNELS OF DISBURSEMENT (GOVERNMENT, PRIVATE SECTOR,NSAS, MULTILATERAL ORGANISATIONS) APPROPRIATE TO THE NATIONAL CONTEXT AND EU STRATEGIC POLICY AIMS?
4.7 EQ7 - TO WHAT EXTENT HAS THE EC COORDINATED AND COOPERATED WITH EU MEMBER STATES AND IFIS INTENDING TO IMPROVE THE COMPLEMENTARITY OF THEIR INTERVENTIONS?
4.8 EQ8 - TO WHAT EXTENT DID THE EC APPROACH RESULT IN PROGRESS TOWARDS A BALANCED ECONOMIC PARTNERSHIP BETWEEN MALAYSIA AND EU WITHIN THE OVERALL PROCESS OF INTEGRATION INTO THE WORLD ECONOMY THAT WOULD NOT HAVE OCCURRED ABSENT EC CO-OPERATION PROGRAMMES?
5 Conclusions
5.1 GLOBAL
| 5.2 SPECIFIC
6 Recommendations
6.1 GLOBAL
6.2 SPECIFIC
VOLUME II: ANNEXES
1. List of people met
2. List of documents consulted
3. Information Matrix
4. Methodology
Author (Corp. Body): PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt, Freiburg im Breisgau
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen | Development Researchers Net
Year: 2009
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Ref. Ares(2012)188081 | Ref. 1265
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationdevelopment aidEUEuropean Commissionfinancial assistancegender mainstreamingglobalizationcommerce
university level of educationimplementationcooperationMalaysiahuman rightsenvironmental policyadministrationeconomy
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesMalaysia
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of the European Commission’s Co-operation with Thailand : Final Report ; Volume 1
Title (other): Evaluation of the European Commission’s Co-operation with Thailand : Final Report ; Volume 2 | Fiche contradictoire :
Evaluation of the European Commission's cooperation with Thailand ; Country Level Evaluation | Evaluation of the
European Commission's cooperation with Thailand : Country Level Evaluation ; Final Report ; Quality Assessment Grid |
Evaluation of the European Commission’s cooperation with Thailand : Ref. 1268 ; EVINFO
Abstract
The main objectives of this evaluation is to provide an overall independent and accountable assessment of the European Commission’s cooperation relations with Thailand during the 1997-2007 period, to identify lessons learnt from past cooperation and thus to assist the implementation of the present strategy and preparation of future strategies. During the period, European Commission’s disbursement totalled some € 110 million.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Executive summary
1 Introduction
2 Methodology
2.1 Evaluation process
2.2 Evaluation limits
3 Background
3.1 EC cooperation context
3.2 Economy
3.3 Social Sectors
3.4 Major cross-cutting issues
3.5 EC strategic response
3.6 Other assistances and coordination
4 Findings4.2 EQ2 - To what extent have the commission's interventions in the sector of higher education contributed to increase mutual understanding and awareness?
4.3 EQ3 - To what extent have the commission's interventions in the sector of public health and health services contributed to the universal health care coverage?
4.4 EQ4 - To what extent were the EC programmes in the country consistent with the global objectives of EC response to global challenges faced by ASEAN, particularly environment issues?
4.5 EQ5 - To what extent has EC mainstreaming of gender, governance and human rights into its cooperation programmes resulted in enhanced governance in the country?
4.6 EQ6 - To what extent has the EC assessed and considered (i) the government’s priorities, (ii) the needs of the country and, (iii) the evolving context in programming its strategic response, including the follow-up of the implementation strategy?
4.7 EQ7 - To what extent was the EC mix of instruments (regional and thematic budget lines), approaches (fiduciary funds, project approach, macro-level programmes, SWAP), financing modalities (specific procedures, budget support, joint funding) and/or channels of disbursement (government, private sector, NSAs, multilateral organisations) appropriate to the national context and EU strategic policy aims?
4.8 EQ8 - To what extent has the EC coordinated and cooperated with EU Member states and IFIs intending to improve the complementarity of their interventions?
| 4.9 EQ9 - To what extent did the EC approach result in progress toward a balanced economic partnership between Thai and EU within the overall process of integration into the world economy that would not have occurred absent EC cooperation programmes?
5 Conclusions
5.1 Global conclusions
5.2 Specific Conclusions
6 Recommendations
6.1 Global recommendations
6.2 Specific recommendations
Volume 2
ANNEX I: FIELD MISSION INFORMATION COLLECTION PLAN
ANNEX II: LIST OF PEOPLE MET
ANNEX III: LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONSULTED
ANNEX IV: INFORMATION MATRIX
ANNEX V: LIST OF EC PROJECTS
Author (Corp. Body): PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen | DRN | Aide a? la De?cision
Year: 2009
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Ref. 1268
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationdevelopment aidEUfinancial assistancefiscal policygender mainstreaminghealthpublic health services
commerceuniversity level of educationcooperationhuman rightsregional developmentsocial welfare stateThailandenvironmental policyadministrationeconomy
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesThailand
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Joint strategic country evaluation of the development cooperation of Denmark, Sweden and the European Union with
Bangladesh 2007 - 2013 : Final Report
Title (other): Joint strategic country evaluation of the development cooperation of Denmark, Sweden and the European Union with
Bangladesh 2007 - 2013 : Final Report ; Volume II – Annexes | Fiche Contradictoire : Joint Country Level Evaluation of
Bangladesh | Joint strategic country evaluation of the development cooperation of Denmark, Sweden and the European Union
with Bangladesh 2007 - 2013 : Final Report ; Executive Summary
Abstract
This Joint Country Evaluation of the development cooperation of Denmark, Sweden and the European Union with Bangladesh has a dual objective of firstly providing accountability through an overall independent assessment of the cooperation strategy and delivery of the Evaluation Partners in Bangladesh, and secondly informing future decision-making through lessons learnt. The main focus of the evaluation is the development cooperation extended during the 2007-2013 period, including both spending and non-spending activities.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
LIST OF ACRONYMS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION
1.2 EVALUATION PROCESS
1.3 EVALUATION METHODOLOGY
1.4 LIMITS OF THE EVALUATION
1.5 CONTEXT OF EPS’ENGAGEMENT IN BANGLADESH
2. STRATEGIC RELEVANCE AND AID EFFECTIVENESS
2.1 EQ1: STRATEGIES
2.2 EQ2: COHERENCE, COORDINATION AND COMPLEMENTARITY
2.3 EQ9: AID MODALITIES AND CAPACITIES
3. ASSESSMENT OF EPS’SUPPORT IN MAJOR AREAS OF ENGAGEMENT
3.1 EQ3: EPS’SUPPORT TO PRIMARY EDUCATION (STEP 1)
3.2 EQ4: RESULTS IN PRIMARY EDUCATION (STEP 2)
3.3 COMBINING EQ3 & EQ4: CONTRIBUTION OF EPS’SUPPORT TO PRIMARY EDUCATION RESULTS (STEP 3)
3.4 EQ5: PRIVATE SECTOR DEVELOPMENT
3.5 EQ6: HUMAN RIGHTS AND DEMOCRATIC GOVERNANCE
3.6 EQ7: CLIMATE CHANGE AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT
3.7 EQ8: GENDER EQUALITY
4. OVERALL ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSIONS
4.1 OVERALL ASSESSMENT: PROMOTING INCLUSIVE GROWTH IN A CHALLENGING CONTEXT
4.2 CONCLUSIONS
5. RECOMMENDATIONS
| LIST OF ANNEXES
ANNEX 1 - TERMS OF REFERENCE
ANNEX 2 - NATIONAL CONTEXT AND EVALUATION PARTNERS ENGAGEMENT IN BANGLADESH
ANNEX 3 - METHODOLOGY OF THE EVALUATION AND EVALUATION QUESTIONS
ANNEX 4 - LIST OF EVALUATION PARTNERS INTERVENTIONS
ANNEX 5 - DETAILED FACTS AND FINDINGS FOR EACH EVALUATION QUESTION
ANNEX 6 - PROJECT FICHES
ANNEX 7 - LIST OF PEOPLE MET
ANNEX 8 - LIST OF DOCUMENTS CONSULTED
ANNEX 9 - MINUTES OF THE DISCUSSION SEMINAR IN DHAKA
Author (Corp. Body): Aide a? la De?cision Economique
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Internationale Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung | COWI AS | Dänemark | Schweden
Year: 2016
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract No EVA 2011/Lot 4 | N° 2014/350917/1 | Ref. Ares (2016)5406779
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: BangladeshevaluationeducationDenmarkdemocratizationdevelopment aidEUfinancial assistance
gender mainstreamingdisaster controlclimate changecooperationhuman rightsperspectiveprimary educationprivate sectorSweden
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesDenmarkSwedenBangladesh
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
« Previous
Next »
Copyright (C) 2003-2019 European Documentation Centres / Update: 09.10.2019