Suche nach Schlagworten '00227204'
24 entries found on 2 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 20Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),
Title: Comparative Study on Best Practices in the Field of Forced Return Monitoring : Final report ; JLS/2009/RFXX/CA/1001 |
---|
Table of Contents Executive Summary 1.0 Introduction 2.0 Methodology 2.1 Client Meetings and Key Deliverables 2.3 Desk Research 2.4 Comparative Country Overview: Survey 2.5 Best Practice: Case Studies 3.0 Conceptual Framework 3.1 Basic Classification of Irregular Migrants 3.2 Voluntary and Forced Return 3.3 Features of a Standard Forced Returns Monitoring System 4.0 Comparative Country Overview 4.1 Overview of Voluntary and Forced Returns 4.2 Forced Returns Monitoring Systems 4.3 Organisations in Charge of Monitoring Forced Return 4.4 Scope of the Monitoring System 4.5 Tasks & Competencies of the Monitors 5.0 An Inventory of Best Practices 5.1 Organisations Involved in Monitoring Forced Returns 5.2 Scope of Monitoring System 5.3 Tasks and Competencies of Monitors 5.4 Frontex Flights 6.0 Conclusions & Recommendations (Checklist) APPENDICES Appendix A: Detailed Situation Across Member States Appendix B: Bibliography Appendix C: Survey Questionnaire Appendix D: Country Profiles Austria ... Iceland ... Switzerland United Kingdom Appendix E: Interview Question Catalogue Appendix F: Case Studies Austria Belgium France Germany Latvia Luxembourg Norway Poland Switzerland |
Author (Corp. Body): Matrix insight | International Centre for Migration Policy Development, Wien |
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Inneres |
Year: 2011 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: JLS/2009/RFXX/CA/1001 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: deportationbest practiceEUmonitoring |
Subject: European Community law in generalMigrationVarious information networks and systems |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Comparative Study on Practices in the Field of Return of Minors : Final report (including results of the November 2011 Final Conference) ; HOME/2009/RFXX/PR/1002 |
---|
Table of Contents ACKNOWLEDGMENTS SECTION 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY SECTION 2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.2 THE RETURN DIRECTIVE AND HOW IT AFFECTS CHILDREN 2.3 OTHER RELEVANT INSTRUMENTS AND POLICIES THAT CONSIDER CHILDREN IN THE PROCESS OF RETURN 2.4 METHODOLOGY 2.5 PARAMETERS OF THE RESEARCH AND STUDY OUTPUT AND POTENTIAL FUTURE STEPS SECTION 3. STATISTICS SECTION 4. DETAILED OVERVIEW OF THE CURRENT LEGISLATION AND ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE IN EACH MEMBER STATE CONCERNING THE RIGHTS AND THE TREATMENT OF CHILDREN IN THE RETURN PROCESS 4.1 CONTEXT AND GENERAL OVERVIEW 4.2 DETAILED FINDINGS 4.3 JURISPRUDENCE SECTION 5. A GENERAL OVERVIEW OF THE ADMINISTRATIVE PRACTICE IN THE SELECTED COUNTRIES OF RETURN CONCERNING THE RECEPTION OF CHILDREN 5.1 AFGHANISTAN 5.2 ANGOLA 5.3 KOSOVO 5.4 MOROCCO 5.5 NIGERIA 5.6 SRI LANKA 5.7 UKRAINE SECTION 6. CRITERIA FOR IDENTIFYING GOOD AND NOTEWORTHY PRACTICES SECTION 7. AN INVENTORY OF NOTEWORTHY PRACTICES CONCERNING THE RETURN OF CHILDREN BOTH IN MEMBER STATES AND COUNTRIES OF RETURN 7.1 DESIGNING THE RETURN PROCEDURE: GENERAL CHILD RIGHTS AND CHILD PROTECTION 7.2 ASSISTANCE TO UNACCOMPANIED AND SEPARATED CHILDREN PRIOR TO A RETURN DECISION 7.3 DECISION MAKING PROCEDURES 7.4 POST DECISION AND PRE-RETURN PHASE 7.5 DETENTION 7.6 THE RETURN PROCESS 7.7 ARRIVAL IN COUNTRY OF RETURN AND POST RETURN REINTEGRATION ACTIVITIES AND MONITORING SECTION 8. A CHECKLIST FOR SUPPORTING MEMBER STATES WHEN CONSIDERING THE RETURN OF CHILDREN TO THIRD COUNTRIES A. INTRODUCTION TO THE CHECKLIST B. THE CHECKLIST SECTION 9. CONCLUSIONS ANNEX 1: REGIONAL STAKEHOLDERS INTERVIEWED ANNEX 2: NATIONAL STAKEHOLDERS INTERVIEWED ANNEX 3: CLOSING CONFERENCE REPORT ANNEX 4: MEMBER STATESCOUNTRY FICHES ANNEX 5. BIBLIOGRAPHY |
Author: Smith, Terry | David, Helene | O'Donnell, Rebecca |
Contributer: European Council on Refugees and Exiles | Save the Children |
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Inneres |
Year: 2011 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: HOME/2009/RFXX/PR/1002 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: best practicethird countriesEUchildremigration |
Subject: European Community law in generalHuman rightsMigration |
Countries Scheme: Global ResourcesEurope. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Handbook on Integration for policy-makers and practitioners : Third edition |
---|
Table of Contents Preface Introduction Chapter 1: European exchange of information and good practice 1.1 Targeted European cooperation on integration 1.2 The Handbook in focus Chapter 2: Mass media and integration 2.1 Challenges and opportunities in the media environment 2.2 Developing an effective media strategy 2.3 Creating a more diverse media Conclusions Chapter 3: Awareness-raising and migrant empowerment 3.1 Awareness-raising : informing opinion and activating the public 3.2 Building capacity and choosing action Conclusions Chapter 4: Dialogue Platforms 4.1 Setting up and running a platform : overcoming obstacles 4.2 Roles for a leading public authority or civil society organisation Conclusions Chapter 5: Acquisition of nationality and the practice of active citizenship 5.1 Concepts and multiple interests in the shared future of a diverse society 5.2 The acquisition of nationality 5.3 Administrative procedures encouraging citizens-to-be 5.4 From acquisition to active citizenship among old and new citizens Conclusions Chapter 6: Immigrant Youth, Education and the Labour Market 6.1 Improving the school system 6.2 Investing in pupils 6.3 Facilitating the transition to higher education and the labour market Conclusions Annex I : Common basic principles for immigrant integration policy in the European Union Annex II : Integration benchmarking tool Annex III : National Contact Points on Integration Annex IV : Selected Bibliography |
Author: Huddleston, Thomas | Niessen, Jan |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz, Freiheit und Sicherheit |
Publisher: Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen |
Year: 2010 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978-92-79-13511-8 | NE-32-09-134-EN-C |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: best practiceimmigrationEUstrategy of integrationadolescentmass media |
Subject: Economic and social developmentAspects of migration |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Examining the links between organised crime and corruption |
---|
Table of Contents Acknowledgements List of abbreviations Referencing guide List of figures List of tables Executive Summary 1. Introduction 1.1 Purpose and scope of the study 1.2 Methodological approach 1.3 Data access and representativeness 1.4 Report structure 1.5 Defining organised crime and corruption 1.6 Measuring Corruption and Organised Crime 1.7 Policy context 2. Corruption and organised crime: evidence from literature 2.1 The literature review process 2.2 General studies 2.3 Judicial corruption and organised crime 2.4 Political Corruption and organised crime 2.5 Police corruption and organised crime 2.6 Corruption in the military and organise crime 2.7 Corruption in prisons and organise crime 2.8 Administrative corruption and organised crime 2.9 Private sector corruption 3. Mapping corruption and organised crime in the EU 3.1 Selecting indicators 3.2 Linking corruption and organised crime: statistical evidence 3.3 Clustering Member States quantitative approach 3.4 Qualitative data mapping organised crime and corruption in EU 4. Organised crime, corruption and public bodies 4.1 Data issues 4.2 Political corruption and organised crime 4.3 Police corruption 4.4 Customs corruption 4.5 Judicial corruption 5. Organised crime, corruption, and the private sector 5.1 Scope of private sector corruption 5.2 Facilitating criminal activities 5.3 Money laundering 5.4 Professional services 5.5 Abusing a company 5.6 Anti-corruption measures 6. Corruption and criminal markets 6.1 Illegal cigarettes 6.2 Prostitution and trafficking of human beings for sexual exploitation 6.3 Drugs 6.4 Vehicle-theft 6.5 Extortion racketeering 7. Conclusions and recommendations 7.1 Key findings 7.2 The impact of corruption 7.3 Recommendations Annex 1 - 11 Country study ... Bibliography |
Author: Gunev, Filip ; 1057018023 | Bezlov, Tichomir ; 1029935653 |
Contributer: Centa?r za izsledvane na demokracijata, Sofia |
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz, Freiheit und Sicherheit |
Year: 2010 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978-954-477-162-1 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: best practiceEUcorruptionorganized crimecrime fighting |
Subject: European Community law in generalCriminal law |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Assessing the effectiveness of EU Member States practices in the identification, tracing, freezing and confiscation of criminal assets : Final Report |
---|
Table of Contents List of Figures List of Tables Executive Summary 1.1 Aims and methods 1.2 Conclusions 1.3 Asset recovery statistics and performance measurement 1.4 Recommendations 2.0 Introduction 2.1 Report structure 3.0 Methodology 3.1 Legislation and literature review 3.2 Survey 3.3 Interviews and case studies 4.0 Legislative background and literature review 4.1 EU Legislation and reports 4.2 Academic literature review 4.3 Legislation overview 4.4 The role of European institutions 5.0 Findings 5.1 The investigative phase 5.2 The main drivers behind investigation 5.3 Lesser drivers 5.4 Obstacles to investigation: cooperation and capacity 5.5 Other obstacles to investigation: attitudes and investigative speed 5.6 Use of investigative tools 5.7 Asset tracing: obstacles and issues 5.8 International cooperation 5.9 The judicial phase 5.10 Judicial traditions 5.11 Obstacles: the importance of international cooperation 5.12 Obstacles: domestic and procedural issues 5.13 Process speed 5.14 Success and failure in the judicial phase 5.15 The disposal phase 5.16 Management of seized/confiscated assets 5.17 Disposal of assets and transfers to the state 5.18 Obstacles to disposal 6.0 Measuring the effectiveness of asset recovery 6.1 Measuring effectiveness 6.2 Measuring efficiency 7.0 Statistical data and measurement of asset recovery 7.1 Data availability 7.2 Data comparability 8.0 Policy options 9.0 Planned research tasks eliminated 10.0 Conclusions and recommendations 10.1 Conclusions 10.2 Asset recovery statistics and performance measurement 10.3 Recommendations 10.4 Case studies Appendix 1: United Kingdom case study report Appendix 2: France case study report Appendix 3: Bulgaria case study report Appendix 4: Spain case study report Appendix 5: Italy case study report Appendix 6: Legislative basis for asset recovery Appendix 7: Vocabulary Appendix... |
Author: Gunev, Filip ; 1057018023 | Redhead, Matthew | Irving, Barrie |
Contributer: matrix insight |
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Inneres |
Year: 2009 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: best practiceEUcriminalityprocedureassets |
Subject: European Community law in generalPublic administration. Executive power |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesBulgariaItalySpainFranceUnited Kingdom |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Study on the best practices in cooperation between authorities and civil society with a view to the prevention and response to violent radicalisation |
---|
Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION 2. METHODOLOGY 3. LITERATURE REVIEW 3.1 Context of the study 3.2 Understanding civil society 3.3 Civil society and public policy 3.4 Development of civil society and social capital 3.5 Arts, culture and civil society 3.6 Terrorism and civil society 3.7 Uncivil society 3.8 Civil society and Social Movements Theory 3.9 Role of civil society in counter radicalisation 3.10 Best Practice Framework 4. COOPERATION AND COUNTERING RADICALISATION ACROSS EUROPE 4.1 National themes 4.2 Civil society 4.3 Responses to violent radicalisation 5. PRINCIPLES OF GOOD PRACTICE 6. ENGAGEMENT WITH CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS 6.1 Emerging Themes 7. EXAMPLES OF GOOD PRACTICE 7.1 Belgium 7.2 Denmark 7.3 France 7.4 Germany 7.5 Hungary 7.6 The Netherlands 7.7 Spain 7.8 Sweden 7.9 United Kingdom 7.10 International 8. CONCLUSIONS 8.1 The value of co-operation between authorities and Muslim civil society 8.2 Priority areas for engagement 8.3 Principles of engagement 8.4 Development Needs of CSOs 8.5 Development Needs of Public Authorities 9. RECOMMENDATIONS 9.1 General recommendations 9.2 Recommendations for developing effective co-operation with civil society Appendix A: Bibliography Appendix B: Researchers |
Author (Corp. Body): Change Institute |
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Inneres |
Year: 2008 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: government agencybest practiceEUcooperationpreventionradicalismcivil society |
Subject: Peace. Wars. TerrorismPublic administration. Executive powerSociety and social groups |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Study on Best practices in vertical relations between the Financial Intelligence Unit and (1) law enforcement services and (2) Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Reporting entities with a view to indicating effective models for feedback on follow-up to and effectiveness of suspicious transaction reports. : Final Report on feedback |
---|
Table of Contents I. INTRODUCTION a. Executive summary b. The setup of the report and study: c. The scope of the study: II. METHODOLOGY OF WORK a. The collection of the necessary information b. The institutions visited: c. The desk-analysis, site interviews and team cooperation III. DEFINITION AND TYPES OF FEEDBACK a. Definition of Feedback b. Types of feedback: c. Feedback in cases of financing of terrorism: d. Feedback, the legal aspects: e. Feedback, the operational aspects: f. Timing of the feedback: IV. FEEDBACK EU BENCHMARKING ANALYSIS a. The overall feedback level within the EU: b. Good practices of feedback: c. Possible individual feedback in the Member States: d. Member States feedback FIU -> RE e. Member States feedback LEA -> FIU f. Member States feedback LEA -> RE g. Feedback as a catalyst for more AML / CFT reporting: h. Feedback on the basis of intelligence: V. THE REPORTING ENTITIES a. Types of reporting entities: b. A global overview by KPMG c. Comparative analysis among REs: d. Profiling clients: e. Analysis of present situation in REs, the questionnaire: f. Accreditation of Compliance officers: VI. THE FINANCIAL INTELLIGENCE UNIT a. Feedback by type of FIU b. Comparative analysis among FIUs: c. Analysis of present situation in the FIUs, the questionnaire: VII. LAW ENFORCEMENT AUTHORITIES a. The investigative Units of the Police: b. Feedback from the LEAs c. Comparative analysis among LEAs : d. Analysis of present situation with LEAs, the questionnaire: VIII. BEST PRACTICES IN THE MEMBER STATES 1. Austria 2. France 3. The Netherlands: 4. Germany: 5. Slovenia 6. Belgium: 7. Luxembourg: 8. Czech Republic: 9. Slovakia: 10. Ireland: 11. Cyprus: 12. Greece: 13. Latvia: 14. Estonia: 15. Lithuania: 16. Bulgaria: 17. Malta: 18. United Kingdom: ... IX. GENERAL CONCLUSIONS: X. RECOMMENDATIONS |
Author (Corp. Body): B&S; Europe |
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Inneres |
Year: 2008 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: JLS/D2/2007/08 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: best practiceEUfundingcriminalityprosecutionterrorism |
Subject: Peace. Wars. TerrorismPublic administration. Executive powerMoney. Financing |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Diversity within small and medium-sized enterprises : best practices and approaches for moving ahead |
---|
Abstract This is a guide for European small and medium-sized enterprise (SMEs) managers wishing to improve the competitiveness and the social and economic performance of their business by building on the diversity of their workforce. The publication contains basic information for all SMEs to use, regardless of their size (from 1 to 500 employees), business sector, location (local, regional, national) and management mode. This publication is not intended to be comprehensive but rather to highlight key elements for successful diversification by SME management.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents GENERAL INTRODUCTION 1. Supporting SMEs with diversity management 2. The business case for diversity 3. Received ideas about diversity management SECTION 1: PRACTICAL GUIDANCE 1. A clear and formal commitment 2. Training the whole workforce 3. Recruiting without discrimination 4. Opening up to new clients and markets 5. Internal and external communication 6. What gets measured gets done SECTION 2: BEST PRACTICES OF SMEs SUCCESSFULLY IMPLEMENTING DIVERSITY MEASURES Work-life balance: harmonising human and business considerations Flexibility in the workplace: an asset for the company Diversity management: making place for difference Repositioning meritocracy as the bedrock of corporate culture SECTION 3: BEST PRACTICES OF LARGE CORPORATE GROUPS SUCCESSFULLY SUPPORTING SMEs DEFINE AND IMPLEMENT THEIR DIVERSITY POLICIES Disability management: empowering disabled clients and employees Youth and apprenticeship: big companies fostering SMEs find the workforce they need Changing the perception of disability in the workplace Big companies helping SMEs alleviate the burden of RH processes Big groups experience in diversity management: a great potential for SMEs to exploit Peer support among Diversity Charter signatories LIST OF EXISTING DIVERSITY MANAGEMENT TOOLS BIBLIOGRAPHY |
Author: Hajjar, Laure | Hugonet, Chloé |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Verbraucher | IMS Entreprendre pour la Cite?, Paris |
Publisher: Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen, Luxemburg |
Year: 2015 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: handicapbest practiceequal opportunitydiscriminationEUadolescentsmall-scale businessmedium-sized firm personnel employment |
Subject: European Community law in generalEqual opportunitiesMedium and small industriesPersonnel management |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Evaluation of TAIEX Instrument : Final Evaluation Report ; August 2015 |
---|
Title (other): The European Unions Instrument for Pre-Accession (IPA) : FWC COM 2011 - Lot 1 Studies and Technical Assistance in All Sectors | Evaluation of TAIEX Instrument : Final Evaluation Report ; Annexes | Evaluation de linstrument TAIEX : Résumé analytique | Evaluation of TAIEX Instrument : Final Evaluation Report ; Résumé analytique |
Abstract The purpose of this final evaluation has been to assess the capacity of the Technical Assistance and Information Exchange instrument of the European Commission (TAIEX). The assessment has specifically covered TAIEX?s capacity in making available the expertise of Member States' public officials and administrations to countries wishing to align their standards with those of the European Union (EU)in the most relevant and effective way. The final evaluation covers all TAIEX assistance funded by the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA)from 2007 to date.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1. PURPOSE OF THE EVALUATION 1.2. METHODOLOGY AND APPROACH 1.3. EVALUATION SAMPLE 1.4. EVALUATION TOOLS AND THE DATA COLLECTION METHODS 1.5. SWOT ANALYSIS OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF TAIEX IN THE IPA REGION 1.6. EVALUATION CONSTRAINTS 2. BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT 2.1 TAIEX INSTRUMENT 2.2 TAIEX STATISTICS FOR THE COUNTRIES IN THE SAMPLE FOR 2010-2014 3. KEY FINDINGS RELEVANCE 3.1 INTERVENTION LOGIC 3.2 PROGRAMMATIC APPROACH EFFICIENCY 3.3 TIMELINESS OF IMPLEMENTATION 3.4 TYPES OF EVENTS AND THEIR EFFICIENCY 3.5 PROJECT REPORTING/MONITORING AND QUALITY ASSURANCE 3.6 COMMUNICATION AND VISIBILITY ACTIVITIES EFFECTIVENESS 3.7 APPROPRIATENESS OF THE TAIEX INSTRUMENT TO NEEDS (FROM AN IMPLEMENTATION PERSPECTIVE) 3.8 OBSTACLES TO THE EFFECTIVENESS OF TAIEXEVENTS 3.9 COMPLEMENTARITY/COHERENCE WITH OTHER DONOR AND EU-FUNDED PROGRAMMES AND INSTRUMENTS IMPACT SUSTAINABILITY SWOT ANALYSIS OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF TAIEX IN THE IPA REGION 4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS |
Author (Corp. Body): AETS |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission |
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Veröffentlichungen |
Year: 2016 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978-92-79-55190-1 | EZ-01-16-170-EN-N | Request for Services 2014/346665/1 | EuropeAid/129783/C/SER/Multi | 978-92-79-55191-8 | EZ-01-16-171-EN-N | 978-92-79-55193-2 | EZ-01-16-172-FR-N |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: counselingbest practiceevaluationpromotion of developmentEUEU expansiongovernanceassistance information exchangeprogramlegal usagetechnical assistanceadministration |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and other financial instruments |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Tackling the gender pay gap : Belgium, 20 - 21 October 2016 ; Discussion Paper - Belgium |
---|
Title (other): The EU Mutual Learning Programme in Gender Equality | Beseitigung des geschlechtsspezifischen Lohngefälles : Belgien, 20. - 21. Oktober 2016 ; Zusammenfassung | Programm Voneinander Lernen auf dem Gebiet der Geschlechtergleichstellung | Tackling the gender pay gap : Belgium, 20 - 21 October 2016 ; Summary Report | Combler lécart de rémunération entre les sexes : Belgique, 20 et 21 octobre 2016 ; Rapport de synthèse | Programme d'apprentissage mutuel d'égalité des sexes | Tackling the gender pay gap : Belgium, 20 - 21 October 2016 ; Comments Paper - Austria |
Abstract Das Seminar fand am 20.-21.Oktober 2016 in Brüssel statt und widmete sich bewährten Verfahren, um gegen Einkommensunterschiede zwischen Frauen und Männern anzugehen. Auch wenn in einigen EU-Staaten Fortschritte erzielt wurden, besaß das Seminar angesichts der tief verwurzelten Problematik eine besondere Relevanz. Die im Gastgeberland Belgien in einem einschlägigen Gesetz von 2012 beschlossenen Maßnahmen bzw. deren praktische Umsetzung bildeten den Seminarschwerpunkt. VertreterInnen und Fachleute aus 17 weiteren Mitgliedstaaten nahmen teil, darunter Deutschland, Estland, Frankreich, Griechenland, Irland, Kroatien, Litauen, Malta, den Niederlanden, Österreich, Polen, Portugal, Rumänien, der Slowakei, Spanien und der Tschechischen Republik. Die Europäische Kommission und das Europäische Institut für Gleichstellungsfragen wirkten ebenfalls mit.[Urheber s. Copyright] |
Author (Corp. Body): ösb consulting |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Verbraucher |
Year: 2016 |
Language: en | de | fr |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: best practicedifference in incomeEUwomansalaryequality of treatmentman |
Subject: European Community law in generalEqual opportunitiesWages. Wage incentives |
Countries Scheme: Germany. General ResourcesAustria. General ResourcesEurope. General ResourcesEstoniaLithuania PolandSlovak RepublicCzech RepublicCroatiaRomaniaGreeceMaltaPortugalBelgiumFrance United KingdomIrelandNetherlands |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Integration of beneficiaries of international/humanitarian protection into the labour market : policies and good practices ; Synthesis Report for the EMN Focussed Study 2015 |
---|
Abstract This Study examined (i) labour market access rights for beneficiaries of international protection both in legislation and in practice, (ii) the availability of employment-related support measures for beneficiaries, (iii) good practices and obstacles in Member States policies related to beneficiaries labour market access and participation, as well as (iv) differences in the treatment of the different statuses (i.e. refugee status, subsidiary protection and humanitarian protection).[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents Executive summary 1 Introduction 1.1 Study rationale 1.2 Study Aims 1.3 Scope of the Study 1.4 Structure of the report 2 Statistical overview of the population of beneficiaries of international protection and their labour market participation 2.1 Population of beneficiaries of international protection 2.2 Labour market participation 3 Labour market access rights in law and in practice 3.1 The legal right to access the labour market 3.2 Obstacles to the legal right to employment 3.3 Other Practical obstacles to access the labour market 4 Organisation and content of labour market integration policy for beneficiaries of international protection 4.2 Organisation of employment-related support measures 5 Selection of employment related support measures to access the labour market 5.1 Language courses 5.2 Orientation services 5.3 Education 5.4 Vocational education and training 5.5 Procedures for the recognition of qualifications 5.6 Counselling services 5.7 Access to housing 5.8 Guaranteed minimum income 6 Conclusions |
Author (Corp. Body): European Migration Network |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Migration und Inneres |
Year: 2016 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: labor marketbest practiceEUrefugeelaw relating to refugeesassistancelegal usage |
Subject: European Community law in generalHuman rightsLabour market |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: The effectiveness of return in EU Member States 2017 : Synthesis Report for the EMN Focussed Study |
---|
Abstract The return of illegally-staying third-country nationals is one of the main pillars of the EUs policy on migration and asylum. However, recent Eurostat data show that return rates at EU level have not improved despite the important increase in the number of rejected asylum applications and in the number of return decisions issued since 2014. In its 2015 EU Action Plan on Return and subsequently in its 2017 Communication on a more effective return policy and the accompanying Recommendation, the Commission emphasised the need for a stronger enforcement of EU rules on return in order to increase the overall effectiveness of the EUs return policy. The EMN conducted this study with the purpose of investigating good practices and challenges in Member States application of EU rules on return and equivalent standards.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY KEY POINTS TO NOTE MAIN FINDINGS 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Study rationale 1.2 Study context 1.3 Study aims 1.4 Scope of the study 1.5 Structure of the report 2 CONTEXTUAL OVERVIEW OF THE NATIONAL SITUATION CONCERNING THE RETURN OF THIRD-COUNTRY NATIONALS 2.1 National measures implementing the Return Directive or equivalent standards 2.2 Return of irregularly staying third-country nationals as a priority in Member States 3 SYSTEMATIC ISSUANCE OF RETURN DECISIONS 3.1 Authorities involved in the issuance of a return decision 3.2 Issuance of return decisions 3.3 Timing, validity and scope of return decisions 3.4 Guarantees concerning the issuance of the return decision 4 RISK OF ABSCONDING 4.1 Objective circumstances constituting a rebuttable presumption of the existence of a risk of absconding 4.2 Measures aiming to avoid the risk of absconding 4.3 Challenges in determining the existence of a risk of absconding 5 EFFECTIVE ENFORCEMENT OF RETURN DECISIONS 5.1 Sanctions in case of non-compliance with the return decision 5.2 Mutual recognition of return decisions 5.3 Travel documents 5.4 Use of detention in the return procedure 5.5 Use of alternatives to detention in the return procedure 5.6 Challenges and good practices related to detention and alternatives to detention | 6 PROCEDURAL SAFEGUARDS AND REMEDIES 6.1 Assessment of the non-refoulement principle in the context of return 6.2 Remedies against return decisions 6.3 Suspensive effect of appeals 6.4 Hearing of the third-country national 6.5 Good practices 7 FAMILY LIFE, CHILDREN, AND STATE OF HEALTH 7.1 Categories of third-country nationals vulnerabilities in the context of Return and detention 7.2 Assessment of the Best Interests of the Child on Return Decisions 7.3 State of health of third-country nationals in the return procedure 7.4 Challenges and good practices 8 VOLUNTARY DEPARTURE 8.1 Period for voluntary departure 8.2 Challenges related to voluntary departure 8.3 Good practices related to voluntary departure 9 ENTRY BANS 9.1 Grounds for issuing an entry ban 9.2 Duration of an entry ban 9.3 Registration of entry bans in SIS II 9.4 Issuance of entry bans when illegal stay is detected on exit 9.5 Penalising breach of entry bans 9.6 Effectiveness of entry bans 10 CONCLUSIONS |
Author (Corp. Body): European Migration Network |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission |
Year: 2018 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Migrapol EMN Doc 407 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: policy on asylumright of asylumbest practicethird countriesEUfamily reunionhuman rightsmigration legal usageremigration |
Subject: European Community law in generalHuman rightsMigration |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Family Reunification of Third-Country Nationalsin the EU plus Norway : National Practices ; EMN Synthesis Report for the EMN Focussed Study 2016 |
---|
Abstract The following Synthesis Report presents a comparative overview of the main findings of the 2016 EMN Focussed Study on Family Reunification of Third-Country Nationals (TCNs) in the EU plus Norway: National Report. The Study aims to compare national policies and/ or practices on family reunification between the different EU Member States plus Norway, and to provide up-to-date information on the latest developments in this area of legal migration to Europe since 2011 onwards. The Study further aims to provide comparable data on the scale of family reunification in the EU28 plus Norway at present, as well as overtime (2011-2015 and 2016 where available), supplementing available Eurostat data with national statistics where available.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents Executive summary 1 Introduction 2 Overview of the international and EU legislative framework on family reunification 3 Definition of sponsor and family members 4 Requirements for exercising the right to family reunification 5 Submission and examination of the application for family reunification 6 Access to rights following family reunification 7 Conclusions Annex 1 Statistics on family reunification applications in (Member) States, disaggregated by gender of the sponsor (2011-2016) Annex 2 Statistics on number of TCNs applying for family reunification in (Member) States, disaggregated by gender of the sponsor and/or family member (2011-2016) Annex 3 Statistics on family reunification applications in (Member) States, disaggregated by status of the sponsor (2011-2016) Annex 4Statistics on number of TCNs applying for family reunification in (Member) States, disaggregated by status of the sponsor (2011-2016) Annex 5 Selected CJEU/ ECtHR as well as national case law rulings on family reunification Annex 6 References |
Author (Corp. Body): European Migration Network |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Migration und Inneres |
Year: 2017 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Migrapol EMN [Doc 382] |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: best practicethird countriesEUfamily reunionmigration policylegal usagestatistics |
Subject: European Community law in generalHuman rightsMigration |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Changes in immigration status and purpose of stay: an overview of EU Member States approaches : Synthesis Report for the EMN Focussed Study 2015 |
---|
Abstract The Study examined the different legal frameworks, procedures and practices in place in the Member States to enable third-country nationals to change migration status, as well as the conditions associated with such changes. It also looked at existing obstacles and good practices.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents Executive summary Key points to note 1 Introduction 1.1 Study rationale and aims 1.2 Information on the scale 1.3 Structure of the report 2 EU legal framework and national migration systems in relation to status changes 2.1 The EU legal framework 2.2 General overview of national migration systems in relation to status changes 2.2.1 National migration systems 2.2.2 National debates on change of status 2.3 Main drivers/ reasons behind changes of status promoted by legislators 3 Legal possibilities for change of status while remaining in the Member States 3.1 Legal possibilities to change status from within the Member State 3.1.1 Family 3.1.2 Education 3.1.3 Remunerated activities 3.1.4 Protection purposes 3.1.5 Other 3.2 Alteration of rights 3.3 Stakeholders involved 3.4 Information on the possibilities to change status 4 Admission criteria and legal basis 4.1 Legal basis 4.2 Main admission criteria 4.3 Statuses where the admission criteria differ from the first time application 4.3.1 Changes from student or researcher 4.3.2 Changes from family 4.3.3 Changes from employment-related statuses 4.3.4 Changes from long-stay (D-type) visa 4.3.5 Changes from asylum seeker 4.3.6 Changes from other statuses 4.4 Quota limitations 4.5 Procedural facilitations 5 Effectiveness, impact and perception of national policies regarding changes of status 5.1 Effectiveness and impact of national policies 5.2 Perception of the change of status atnational level 5.3 Change of status and prevention of irregularity 6 Challenges, good practices and lessons learned in change of status 6.1 Challenges for national authorities and applicants 6.2 Good practices and lessons learned | 7 Conclusions Annex 1 Minimum standards of rights for EU and nationally regulated statuses Table A1.1 Minimum standards of rights for EU-regulated statuses Table A1.2 Minimum standards of rights for national statuses regulated by EU law Annex 2 Legal possibilities to change the status Table A2.1 List of legal possibilities to change the status without leaving the country Table A2.2 Share of legal possibilities for changing status in Member States out of total number of countries with each migration status Annex 3 Common admission criteria Table A3.1 Overview of common admission criteria Annex 4 Statistics Table A4.1 All valid residence permits by reason on 31 December and a share of those issued per reason out of total in Member State (2010-2014) Table A4.2 Number and share of applicants for international protection (2010-2015) Table A4.3 Number and share of EU Blue Cards granted (2012-2014) Table A4.4 Issued skilled or highly skilled national labour permits (2010-2015) Table A4.5 Total number of victims of trafficking (identified and presumed) by assistance and protection: residence permit based on Directive 2004/81 as well as other granted residence permits (2010-2012) Table A4.6 Number of changes of immigration status permits by reason (2010-2014) Table A4.7 Number of persons who have changed immigration status more than one time in France (2010-2014 Table A4.8 The average processing time to change the status (the time span between the application for change of status and the granting of the change of status), by purpose of stay in 2014 |
Author (Corp. Body): European Migration Network |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Migration und Inneres |
Year: 2016 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: best practicethird countriesimmigrationEUmigrationlawlegal usageadministrative procedure |
Subject: European Community law in generalMigration |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: The Return of Rejected Asylum Seekers : Challenges and Good Practices ; EMN Synthesis Report for the EMN Focussed Study 2016 |
---|
Abstract Given the recent increase in asylum applications in the EU and considering the general gap between third-country nationals issued a return decision and those that have returned, the EMN conducted this study with the purpose of investigating the specific challenges of the return of rejected asylum seekers and Member State responses to these challenges.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents Annex 3 Use Of Accelerated Procedures In The Member States Annex 4 List Of Abbreviations | Executive Summary Key Points To Note Main Findings 1 Introduction 1.1 Study Rationale 1.2 Study Context 1.3Study Aims 1.4 Scope Of The Study 1.5 Structure Of The Report 2 The Scale Of Rejected Asylum Seekers In The EU And The Scale Of Non-Return 3 National Policies And Measures To Encourage Rejected Asylum Seekers To Leave The EU Territory 3.1 National Prioritisation Of The Return Of Rejected Asylum Seekers 3.2 Policies And Strategies To Encourage Return And Deter (Irregular) Stay Once A Return Decision Is Issued 3.3 Rights/Benefits Granted To Rejected Asylum Seekers 3.3.1 Accommodation .3.2 Other Rights 3.4 Measures Taken To Facilitate Return By Preventing Absconding 3.5 Policy On The Early Preparation Of Asylum Seekers For Potential Return 4 National Legislation Framing The Return Of Rejected Asylum Seekers 4.1 Nexus Between Asylum And Return Decisions 4.2 Possibilities For Appealing The Return Decision 4.3 Possibilities For Lodging Subsequent Asylum Applications 4.4 Member State Measures To Ensure That Unfounded Applications Lead To Swift Return (Accelerated Procedures) 5 Challenges To The Return Of Rejected Asylum Seekers And Member State Policies To Manage These 5.1 General Overview Of Challenges 5.2 Challenges Specific To The Return Of Rejected Asylum Seekers 5.3 Measures Taken To Address Challenges 5.4 Measures To Address Individual Resistance To Return 5.5 Measures To Promote The Cooperation Of Third Countries 5.6 Measures To Enhance The Re-Documentation Process 5.7 Measures To Address Organisational/ Administrative Challenges 5.8 Measures To Facilitate The Return In Medical Cases 6 When Return Is Not (Immediately) Possible 6.1 Provision Of Status 6.2 Access To Rights And Benefits 6.3 Procedures For Reassessing The Possibility Of Return 6.4 The Possibility Of Regularisation 7 Conclusions Annex 1 Rejected Asylum Seekers Access To Rights And Services Annex 2 Statistical Tables |
Author (Corp. Body): European Migration Network |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Migration und Inneres |
Year: 2016 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Migrapol EMN Doc 000 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: right of asylumasylum procedurebest practicethird countriesEUlegal usageremigration |
Subject: European Community law in generalHuman rightsPublic administration. Executive power |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Integration of beneficiaries of international/humanitarian protection into the labour market : policies and good practices ; Common Template of EMN Focussed Study 2015 |
---|
Abstract The overall aim of the study is to inform the target audience (e.g. practitioners, policy officers and decision-makers at both EU and national level including academic researchers and the general public), the Commission and the European Asylum Support Office (EASO) on the application of integration support measures for beneficiaries of international/humanitarian protection in relation to labour market access and participation, identifying existing policies and good practices.[Author vide copyright] |
Author (Corp. Body): European Migration Network |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission |
Year: 2015 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: labor marketbest practiceEUrefugeelaw relating to refugeesassistancelegal usage |
Subject: European Community law in generalHuman rightsLabour market |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Policies, practices and data on unaccompanied minors in the EUMember States and Norway : Synthesis Report for the EMN Focussed Study 2014 |
---|
Title (other): Policies, practices and data on unaccompanied minors in the EU Member States and Norway : Annexes to the Synthesis Report ; Synthesis Report for the EMN Focussed Study 2014 |
Abstract This EMN Study is an update of a previous EMN Study on Policies on reception, return and integration arrangements for, and numbers of, unaccompanied minors carried out in 2008-2009.The Study identifies a number of gaps and challenges that still need to be addressed to ensure all UAMs benefit from the same level of protection...The Study highlights a number of good practices which have been adopted by some (Member) States since 2009,...[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 Definition and scope of the study 1.2 Scale of the issue 2 Motivations and circumstances of unaccompanied minors for entering the EU 2.1 Motivations 2.2 Circumstances of entry 2.3 Projects implemented by (Member) States in third countries 3 Entry and assessment procedures, including border controls for asylum-seeking and non-asylum seeking unaccompanied minors 3.1 Entry conditions and refusal at the border 3.2 Procedures at the border and interception onthe territory 3.3 Age assessment 3.4 Appointment of a guardian/ representative 3.5 Special safeguards for asylum seeking UAMs: the organisation of national asylum procedures 3.5.1 Special safeguards during the different phases of the asylum procedure 3.6 Residence permits granted to unaccompanied minors 3.6.1 Residence permits to TCNs who are victims of trafficking in human beings or who have been the subject of an action to facilitate irregularmigration who cooperate with the competent authorities 3.6.2 Residence permits for non-asylum seeking unaccompanied minors 4 Reception arrangements, including integration measures for unaccompanied minors 4.1 Types of reception facilities for unaccompanied minors 4.2 Staff responsible for the reception and care of UAMs 4.2.1 Supervision rate 4.2.2 Tasks of staff 4.2.3 Training of staff 4.2.4 Types of professionals 4.3 Other material reception conditions for unaccompanied minors 4.4 Non-material reception conditions for unaccompanied minors 4.5 Towards durable solutions for UAMs 5 Unaccompanied minors who go missing or abscond from reception and care facilities 5.1 Data on UAMs who go missing or abscond from reception and care 5.2 Possible reasons for the disappearances of UAMs 5.3 Profile of UAMs who go missing or abscond from reception and care 5.4 Timing of disappearances of UAMs 5.5 Measures to prevent disappearances 5.6 Measures to report and respond todisappearances | 5.7 Challenges associated with the issue of UAMswho go missing or abscond 6 Arrangements in the (Member) States for unaccompanied minors turning 18 years of age 6.1 Situation in the (Member) States of UAMs turning 18 years of age 6.2 Measures in place to support UAMsin advance of the transition 6.3 Measures in place to support UAMs after the transition 6.4 Monitoring mechanisms 6.5 Challenges associated with the impactof UAMs turning 18 6.6 Good practices 7 Return practices of (Member) States, including reintegration of unaccompanied minors 7.1 Return 7.1.1 Voluntary return of UAMs 7.1.2 Forced return of UAMs 7.1.3 Reintegration support and monitoring systems 7.2 UAMs in detention and alternatives to detention 7.2.1 Detention of UAMs 7.2.2 Special circumstances under which UAMs can be detained 7.2.3 Alternatives to detention of UAMs 8 Overview of the international and EU legislative framework 8.1 Introduction 8.2 Provisions in place to address the human rights of UAMs 8.3 The protection of unaccompanied minors in international law and the EU Acquis 9 Conclusions | Annexes Annex 1 Statistics on unaccompanied minors in the (Member) States (2009-2013) Annex 2 Overview tables accompanying Section 3 on entry and assessment procedures, including border controls for unaccompanied children Annex 3 Overview tables accompanying Section 4 on reception arrangements, including integration measures for unaccompanied children Annex 4 Overview table accompanying Section 7 on return and reintegration of unaccompanied children |
Author (Corp. Body): European Migration Network |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Inneres |
Year: 2015 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: policy on asylumbest practiceEUadolescentlegal usageremigrationstatistics |
Subject: European Community lawHuman rightsAspects of migration |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Good practices in the return and reintegration of irregular migrants : Member States entry bans policy and use of readmission agreements between Member States and third countries ; A Study from the European Migration Network 2014 |
---|
Title (other): Synthesis Report for the EMN Focussed Study 2014 |
Abstract This EMN Focussed Study presents an analysis of (Member) States use of entry bans and readmission agreements with a specific focus on their practical application and effectiveness, whilst also identifying good practices in their use, including possible synergies, in the implementation of return and reintegration measures.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction 2 Member States Entry Bans Policy 2.1 Legal and institutional framework for the imposition of entry bans 2.1.1 Grounds for the imposition of entry bans as laid down in Member States legislation 2.1.2 Different approaches to the imposition of an entry ban 2.1.3 Grounds for non-imposition of entry bans and Exclusion of certain categories of third-country nationals 2.1.4 Number of entry bans imposed 2.1.5 Territorial scope 2.1.6 Authorities in charge of decision-making on entry bans 2.1.7 Informing the Third-Country National of the imposition of an entry ban 2.1.8 Appeal possibilities against the imposition of an entry ban 2.2 Practical application of entry bans 2.2.1How entry bans are used 2.2.2 The number of entry bans withdrawn/suspended 2.2.3 Situations where those subject to an entry ban are granted a residence permit 2.3 Cooperation between Member States for the enforcement of entry bans 2.3.1 Entering alerts into the SIS 2.3.2 The exchange of supplementary information between Member States 2.4 Effectiviness of entry bans 2.4.1 Evaluations on the use of entry bans 2.4.2 Statistical evidence on the effectiveness of entry bans 2.4.3 Practical challenges in the implementation of entry bans reducing their effectiveness 3 Readmission Agreements between EU or Member States and third countries 3.1 Institutional set-up 3.1.1 EU Readmission Agreements 3.1.2 The use of EURAs in numbers 3.1.3 Effectiveness of EURAs 3.2 National bilateral readmission agreements between Member States and third countries 3.2.1 The use of nationalbilateral readmission agreements in numbers 3.2.2 Effectiveness of national bilateral readmission agreements 4 Entry bansand Readmission Agreements: Understanding the synergies with reintegration assistance 4.1 Synergies between the implementation of re-entry bans and reintegration assistance | 4.2 Synergies between return under readmission agreements and reintegration assistance 5 Conclusions Annex 1 Legal and institutional framework of entry bans Annex 2 Readmission Agreements |
Author (Corp. Body): European Migration Network |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Inneres |
Year: 2015 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: best practicethird countriesEUborder protectionmigration policylegal usage |
Subject: European Community lawEuropean Community treaties and agreementsMigration |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Identification of victims of trafficking in human beings in international protection and forced return procedures |
---|
Title (other): European Migration Network Study March 2014 |
Abstract This Synthesis Report presents the main findings of the Third 2013 EMN Focussed Study on Identification of Victims of Trafficking in Human Beings in International Protection and Forced Return Procedures. The aim of the Study was to examine whether, and how, potential victims of trafficking in human beings are detected and identified in these procedures in (Member) State. The study concerned both applicants for international protection and failed applicants in forced return procedures who have received a (final) negative decision on their application(s) for protection or have abandoned the procedure. The Synthesis Report is based on the findings presented in 24 National Reports and developed in collaboration with the European Commission, EMN NCPs and the EMN Service Provider.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 Background and context 1.2 EU Legislative framework 1.2.1 Anti-trafficking legislation 1.2.2 The EU asylum acquis 1.2.3 The Dublin Regulation 1.2.4 Legislation on return 1.3 The role of the EU Anti-Trafficking Coordinator and the EU agencies 2 Scope and scale of the problem 2.1 Evidence from national studies 2.2 National statistics 2.2.1 Detection of victims when in international protection procedures 2.2.2 Third-country nationals granted a reflection period or residence permit having been through or having moved from international protection procedures 2.2.3 Third-country nationals granted an international protection status on grounds of being a victim of trafficking 2.2.4 Third-country nationals detected in forced return procedures 3 National Frameworks 3.1 Protocols for children 3.2 Gender-specific protocols 4Detection and identification in international protection procedures 4.1 Mechanisms for detecting victims of trafficking in human beings 4.1.1 Proactive screening 4.1.2 Detection through the recognition of indications of trafficking 4.1.3 Self-reporting 4.2 Systems in place to follow up on suspected cases of trafficking 4.2.1 Immediate referral onto official identification procedures 4.2.2 Assessment by asylum authorities / (specialised) reception centre staff 4.2.3 (Official) identification by asylum authorities / reception centre staff 4.2.4 Alternative assessments and The role of other actors in the identification process | 5 Detection and identification in Dublin procedures 5.1 Mechanisms for detection in Dublin procedures 5.2 Assessment of suspected cases 5.3 Decision not to proceed with a Dublin transfer 6Detection and identification in return procedures 6.1 Mechanisms for detection of victims in forced return procedures 6.1.1 Proactive screening of returnees 6.1.2 Detection through the recognition of indications of trafficking 6.1.3 Self-reporting 6.2 Systems in place to follow up on suspected cases of trafficking 6.2.1 Secondary assessment / identification 6.2.2 Suspension of the return order 6.2.3 Alternative assessments in case of non-identification 7 Training of officials in contact with potential victims of trafficking 7.1 Training to actors in international protection procedures 7.2 Training of actors responsible for enforcing returns 7.3 Providers of training and cooperation 8 Referral 8.1 Possibilities for referral to assistance for victims in international protection procedures 8.1.1 Provision of assistance without changes to procedure 8.1.2 Provision of assistance through changes in procedure 8.1.3 No referral is needed as protection and residence possibilities are assessed at the same time 8.1.4 No referral is needed as third-country nationals can be granted international protection on grounds of trafficking in human beings 8.2 Referral from forced return procedures 8.3 Mechanisms and tools for referral 8.4 Tranfer of personal data 9Conclusions Annex 1 Statistics Annex 2 Glossary Annex 3 Competent authorities |
Author (Corp. Body): European Migration Network |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Inneres |
Year: 2014 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: best practiceEUcriminalityslave tradelegal usagelegal protectionremigration |
Subject: European Community lawHuman rights |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Attracting Highly Qualified and Qualified Third-Country Nationals |
---|
Title (other): European Migration Network Study 2013 |
Abstract The aim of this focussed study was to outline policies and concrete practical measures in Member States that aim to attract (highly) qualified third-country nationals. More specifically, the study aimed to achieve the following objectives:Provide an overview of national policies and EU acquis aimed at attracting (highly) qualified third-country nationals for the purpose of work;Outline concrete practical measures which are implemented to achieve the goals of the national policies;Investigate available evaluative evidence and inform practitioners, policy officers, decision makers and others about the effectiveness (or non-effectiveness) of different practical measures for attracting (highly) qualified third-country nationals where possible;Map labour migration agreements specifically targeting (highly) qualified third-country nationals and analysing their effectiveness, also in the framework of Mobility Partnerships, if relevant;Identify challenges or barriers that affect the attractiveness of an EU Member State for (highly) qualified third-country nationals immigration;Draw conclusions on good practices and lessons learnt with regard to attracting (highly) qualified third-country nationals.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents ExecutiveSummary 1. Introduction 2. Background 2.1 EU Policy and Acquis 2.2 Current Trends in the representationof (highly) qualified third-country nationals in EU Employment 3. National Policies including concepts and measures 3.1 Definitions and Concepts 3.2 National Policies 3.3 Approaches and Measures 3.4 Public Debate 3.5 Agreements with third countries 3.6 Brain drain and brain circulation 4. Effectiveness of Policies and Measures 4.1 Emerging Good Practice 4.2 Challenges and Barriers 5. Impact of EU Acquis 5.1 EU Blue Card Directive 5.2 Researchers Directive 6. Conclusions Annex 1 International Classifications of Education and Occupations Annex 2 Presence of Policies and Strategies for attracting (highly) qualified third-country nationals Annex 3 National Concepts |
Author (Corp. Body): European Migration Network |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Inneres |
Year: 2013 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: labor migrationbest practicethird countriesEUmigration policymobilitylegal basisadministrative procedure |
Subject: European Community treaties and agreementsPersonnel management |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |