Systematic Search for Publications

29 entries found on 2 pages. starting on record 21 ending on 29

Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),

1 | 2
« Previous
Next »
Title: Testing of a Standardised Information Notice for Consumers on the Common European Sales Law : Request for services
JUST/2011/JCIV/FW/ 0135/A4 in the context of the framework service contract EAHC/2011/CP/01 ; Appendix A: Main
supporting appendix
Table of Contents
1. Experiment A: Notice Variants & Discussion of Findings
1.1 Wave I Notice Variants
1.1.1 Variant NL: Trader’s National Law Notice
1.1.2 Variant C.00: Draft Notice
1.1.3 Variant C.01: Rights table
1.1.4 Variant C.02: Rights & periods table
1.1.5 Variant C.03: Clarified
1.1.6 Variant C.04: Detailed
1.1.7 Variant C.05: Comparison
1.1.8 Variant C.06: Title & Intro
1.1.9 Variant C.07: Rights before signing
1.1.10 Variant C.08: Rights after signing
1.1.11 Variant C.09: When to claim
1.1.12 Variant C.10: How to claim
1.1.13 Variant C.11: Examples
1.2 Wave II Notice Variants
1.2.1 Variant P.00: New Baseline Notice (Variant C.06 from Wave I)
1.2.2 Variant P.01: When-to-Claim Table
1.2.3 Variant P.02: EU Insignia
1.2.4 Variant P.03: Text Boxes
1.2.5 Variant P.04: Keywords Highlighted
1.2.6 Variant P.05: Uppercase Highlighting
1.3 Notice Variant Performance
1.3.1 Wave I Variants
1.3.2 Wave II Variants
1.4 Balanced Scorecard Calculation
1.4.1 Version 1 (Presented in Main Report)
1.4.2 Version 2 (Used to corroborate Version 1 recommendations)
1.4.3 Version 1 and 2 Score Comparison
1.5 Drop-Out Rates
2. Experiment B: Discussion of Findings
2.1 Treatment Group Recap
2.2 Findings
2.2.1 Comprehension Scores
2.2.2 Confirmation of Agreement on a Durable Medium
2.2.3 Timing: Delayed presentation (presentation at confirmation screen vs. delivery detail screen)
2.2.4 Forced vs. Unforced Presentation
2.2.5 Click-wrap vs. Browse-wrap
2.2.6 Explicit vs. Implicit Consent
2.2.7 Shopping Channel
3. Review Phase in Detail
3.1 Literature Review
3.1.1 Aims
3.1.2 Methodology
3.1.3 Results of the Literature Review
3.1.4 Key references
3.2 Consumer Interviews
3.2.1 Aims
3.2.2 Consumer Interviews: Methodology & Sample
3.2.3 Results of the Consumer Interviews
3.3 Consumer Survey
3.3.1 Aims
3.3.2 Survey Overview
3.3.3 Results of the Consumer Survey
Author (Corp. Body): The Gallup Organisation, Europe
Contributer: RAND Europe | Decision Technology | Gallup Institute for Advanced Behavioural Studies
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz
Year: 2013
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EUEuropean Lawsales contract
Subject: European Community law in generalEconomic law. Competition lawConsumption. Consumer protection
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Testing of a Standardised Information Notice for Consumers on the Common European Sales Law : Request for services
JUST/2011/JCIV/FW/ 0135/A4 in the context of the framework service contract EAHC/2011/CP/01 ; Appendix B: Experiment,
survey and interview designs
Table of Contents
1. The Behavioural Experiments
1.1 Experiment A: Design & Implementation
1.1.1 Experiment A: Design
1.1.2 Experiment A: Implementation
1.2 Experiment B: Design and Implementation
1.2.1 Experiment B: Design
2. Review Phase:
2.1 Consumer Interviews: Discussion Guide
2.1.1 Section 1: Welcome & Introduction
2.1.2 Section 2: Initial Reactions to the Common European Sales Law and Unprompted Questions
2.1.3 Section 3: Notice Comprehension
2.1.4 Section 4: Presentation
2.1.5 Section 5: Cross Border Purchasing
2.1.6 Section 6: Thank and Close
2.2 Consumer Survey: Survey Design
2.2.1 Flow
2.2.2 Task 0: Screening and Introduction
2.2.3 Task A1: Content and Drafting of CESL Notice (Whole)
2.2.4 Task A2: Content and Drafting of CESL Notice (Sections)
2.2.5 Task B: Consumer Understanding of the CESL Notice
2.2.6 Task C: Background Knowledge of National Law
2.2.7 Task D: Respondent Survey
2.2.8 Miscellaneous Screens
2.2.9 Notice to use in tasks A1, A2 and B. Shading shows sections to be used in task A2
Author (Corp. Body): The Gallup Organisation, Europe
Contributer: RAND Europe | Decision technology | Gallup Institute for Advanced Behavioural Studies
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz
Year: 2013
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EUEuropean Lawsales contract
Subject: European Community law in generalEconomic law. Competition lawConsumption. Consumer protection
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the documentQuelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Testing of a Standardised Information Notice for Consumers on the Common European Sales Law : Request for services
JUST/2011/JCIV/FW/ 0135/A4 in the context of the framework service contract EAHC/2011/CP/01 ; Appendix C: Detailed
experimental findings
Table of Contents
1. The Behavioural Experiments
1.1 Experiment A
1.1.1 Wave I Complete Findings
1.1.2 Wave II Complete Findings
1.2 Experiment B
1.2.1 Complete Findings
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz
Contributer: Rand Europe | Decision technology | Gallup Institute for Advanced Behavioural Studies
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz
Year: 2013
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EUEuropean Lawsales contract
Subject: European Community law in generalEconomic law. Competition lawConsumption. Consumer protection
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the documentQuelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Pilot field study on the functioning of the national judicial systems for the application of competition law rules :
Final Report
Table of Contents
1 Introduction
1.1 Purpose, scope and structure of the study
2 Methodology
2.1 Methodological approach to Part A
2.2 Methodological approach to Part B
2.3 Methodological tool for Part C: Analysis of trends in practices and recurring obstacles
3 Comparative analysis of the organisation of national judicial systems
3.1 Competent courts
3.2 Modes of Alternative Dispute Resolution
4 Comparative analysis of key features of competition law cases and length of legal proceeding
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Number of cases identified
4.3 Parties involved
4.4 Costs
4.5 Other useful information
5 Analysis of feedback on efficiency, quality and independence of the national judicial systems
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Responses received
5.3 Analysis of feedback provided by national judges competent for the application of EU competition law
5.4 Analysis of feedback provided by legal practitioners competent for the application of EU competition law
5.5 Analysis of feedback provided by parties to procedures of EU competition law
Annex 1 National Legislation
Annex 2 National Competition Authorities
Annex 3 Interim measures for judicial review
Annex 4 Court Hearings and Enforcement Orders
EU Country Factsheets
Author: Nierop, Petra van
Contributer: ICF GHK | Milieu Ltd
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz
Year: 2014
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Multiple Framework Contract JUST/2011/EVAL/01
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EUnation-statelegal usagecompetition
Subject: European Community law in generalEconomic law. Competition law
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Study to Assess the Extent of Abuse of Non-Profit Organisations for Financial Criminal Purposes at EU Level
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
Conclusions
Recommendations
1.0 Introduction
1.1 Background
1.2 EC research context
1.3 Balancing state security concerns and the needs of civil society
1.4 Overall aims and purpose of the study
1.5 Structure of the report
2.0 Summary of methodology and tasks
2.1 Delphi survey
2.2 Literature review
2.3 Case studies
2.4 Caveats and clarifications
2.5 Development of concepts and analysis
3.0 Findings
3.1 Review of the existing evidence base
3.2 Delphi survey findings
3.3 Case history archive
4.0 General view of the evidence in relation to the research questions
5.0 Conclusions and recommendations
Recommendations
Appendix 1. Delphi survey questionnaire
Bibliography
Author (Corp. Body): Matrix Insight
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Inneres
Year: 2008
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EUmoney economynon-profit charactercriminalityorganizations
Subject: Economic law. Competition lawCriminal law. Penal sanctions. Penal institutions
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: The role and effectiveness of regional investment aid : The point of view of the academic literature
Abstract
The purpose of this report is to study, from both the theoretical and the empirical point of view, the extent to which regional policy can reduce the disparities in economic activity levels that arise between regions belonging to an integrated trade area as the European Union.[Urheber s. Copyright]
Table of Contents
Summary
Introduction
1 Lessons for regional policy from economic geography (theory)
1.1 Multiple-equilibrium, hysteresis and the scope for regional policies
1.1.1 The Core-Periphery model with migration: Forward or demand linkages
1.1.2 The Core-Periphery model without migration but with intermediate inputs: Backward linkages
Author: Combes, Pierre-Philippe | van Ypersele, Tanguy
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Wettbewerb | Aix Marseille School of Economics
Publisher: Amt für amtliche Veröffentlichungen der Europäischen Gemeinschaften, Luxemburg
Year: 2013
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978-92-79-28198-3 | KD-32-13-024-EN-N
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EU state aid controlEU cohesion fundInvestment policyRegional Policyfinancial aid
Subject: European Community funds and financial instruments. EIBDevelopment plans. RegionsEconomic law. Competition lawPublic finance. State aidResearch methods and theory
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document
Title: Screening report Iceland : Chapter 8 – Competition Policy
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung
Contributer: Europäische Kommission
Year: 2011
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EUjoining of the European UnionIcelandcompetitioneconomic law
Subject: European Community external relationsEconomic law. Competition law
Countries Scheme: Iceland
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Screening report Montenegro : Chapter 8 – Competition Policy
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung
Year: 2012
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EUjoining of the European UnionMontenegrocompetitioneconomic law
Subject: European Community external relationsEconomic law. Competition law
Countries Scheme: Montenegro
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Study on a new approach to business failure and insolvency – Comparative legal analysis of the Member States’
relevant provisions and practices : TENDER NO . JUST/2012/JCIV/CT/0194/A4
Title (other): Study on a new approach to business failure and insolvency – Comparative legal analysis of the Member States’ relevant
provisions and practices : TENDER No. JUST/2012/JCIV/CT/0194/A4 ; Annex 1 List of National Experts
Abstract
The Directorate-General Justice in the European Commission is working on a follow-up to the 2012 Communication of the Commission on “A new approach to business failure and insolvency” and the 2013 public consultation on the same topic. Against this background a study has been commissioned to provide information on restructuring mechanisms already available in all Member States, their main features, effective use, rate of success, cost to the debtor and length. INSOL Europe, the Pan-European association of insolvency professionals, has gathered from its membership a team of experts covering all 28 Member States of the European Union, to provide a comprehensive but condensed report on the restructuring mechanisms currently available in the Member States jurisdictions. Where available, information on the actual application and the rate of success has been provided as well. The study reflects the legal situation in the Member States as of October 2013. The study provides the facts collected across the 28 Member States in an Annex and the report provides an analysis of this data, together with recommendations of the experts for an early preventive restructuring mechanism. The information and views set out in this study are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the Commission. The Commission does not guarantee the accuracy of the data included in this study. Neither the Commission nor any person acting on the Commission’s behalf may be held responsible for the use which may be made of the information contained therein. [Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Abstract
1. Introduction
2. Executive Summary
3. Different kinds of insolvency proceedings
3.1 Confidential Proceedings
3.2 Public pre-insolvency Proceedings
3.3 Debtor-in-possession proceedings (DIP)
3.4 Full proceedings (not DIP)
4. Some elements of insolvency proceedings
4.1 Commencement of proceedings
4.2 Is the debtor left in possession?
4.3 Stay of enforcement
4.4 Cram down on dissenting creditors
4.5 New finance
4.6 Court involvement
4.7 Confidentiality
4.8 Costs and length
4.9 Incentives and success
5. Recommendations for preventive pre-insolvency proceedings
Annex 1 – List of national experts
Annex 2 – Summaries of National Laws
Author: Bariatti, Stefania ; 1032672145 | van Galen, Robert
Contributer: INSOL Europe | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz
Year: 2014
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: JUST/2012/JCIV/CT/0194/A4
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: financial aidplant closureEUlegal proceedingsbankruptcyguiltlaw of obligationsenterprise
entrepreneurreconstruction
Subject: European Community law in generalEconomic law. Competition lawPublic administration. Executive powerIndustrial financing. Industrial management
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
1 | 2
« Previous
Next »
Copyright (C) 2003-2019 European Documentation Centres / Update: 09.10.2019