Search for Institutions

494 entries found on 25 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 20

Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
« Previous
Next »
Title: Building the future together
Title (other): The European Union and the Western Balkans
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen
Publisher: Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen
Year: 2004
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 92-894-5527-6 | KQ-52-03-295-EN-C
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EU expansionassistanceSoutheastern Europe
Subject: Development aid. Aid programmes and aid organizationsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Southeastern Europe, Balkan peninsula. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu.int/)
Title: Evaluation of the European Commission’s Cooperation with Ukraine : Final Report ; Volume 1: Main report
Title (other): Evaluation of the European Commission’s Cooperation with Ukraine : Final Report ; Volume 2: Annexes | Fiche
contradictoire : Evaluation of the Commission’s support to Ukraine (2002-2009) | Qualtiy Grid : Evaluation of the
European Commission’s Cooperation with Ukraine (2002 - 2009) ; Final Report | Evaluation of the Commission of the EU's
co-operation with Ukraine : Ref. 1283 ; EVINFO
Abstract
This evaluation assesses the European Commission’s (EC) cooperation with Ukraine over the period 2002-2009. It aims at providing an overall independent assessment of the entire EC cooperation strategy and support for the country and to provide key lessons for improving current and future EC strategies and programmes.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
ACRONYMS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
MAP
1. OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE1.1 OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION
1.2 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT
2. CONTEXT
2.1 NATIONAL BACKGROUND
2.2 EC COOPERATION FRAMEWORK
2.3 INTERVENTION LOGIC
2.4 EC FUNDING–INVENTORY
2.5 OTHER DONORS’ COOPERATION
3. METHODOLOGY
3.1 EVALUATION PROCESS
3.2 DATA COLLECTION
3.3 LIMITS OF THE ANALYSIS
4. ANSWERS TO THE EVALUATION QUESTIONS
4.1 RELEVANCE
4.2 DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW
4.3 SOCIAL PROTECTION AND ASSISTANCE
4.4 ECONOMIC REFORM AND DEVELOPMENT
4.5 TRADE AND FOREIGN DIRECT INVESTMENTS
4.6 ENVIRONMENT4.7 ENERGY
4.8 BORDER MANAGEMENT
4.9 BUDGET SUPPORT
4.10 EFFICIENCY
5. CONCLUSIONS
5.1 RELEVANCE OF THE COOPERATION STRATEGY
5.2 OUTCOMES AND IMPACTS OF THE STRATEGY IMPLEMENTATION
5.3 AID MODALITIES AND EFFICIENCY
5.4 POLICY DIALOGUE
6. RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1 STRENGTHENING THE ACHIEVEMENT OF EXPECTED OUTCOMES
6.2 IMPROVING THE BALANCE BETWEEN SUPPORT FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT FOR SOCIAL DEVELOPMENT
6.3 IMPROVING THE EFFICIENCY OF INTERVENTIONS
| Volume 2: Annexes
ANNEX 1: TERMS OF REFERENCE
ANNEX 2: INTERVENTION LOGIC
ANNEX 3: EVALUATION QUESTIONS, JUDGMENT CRITERIA, INDICATORS
ANNEX 4: NATIONAL BACKGROUND
ANNEX 5: EC-UKRAINE COOPERATION CONTEXT AND IMPLEMENTATION
ANNEX 6: INVENTORY OF EC INTERVENTIONSANNEX
7: INTERVENTIONS IN BRIEF
ANNEX 8: DATA COLLECTION GRID
ANNEX 9: ANNEXES TO EQ7 ON ENERGY
ANNEX 10: TO WHAT EXTENT HAVE THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PREVIOUS EVALUATION BEEN TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION
ANNEX 11: LIST OF PERSONS MET
ANNEX 12: BIBLIOGRAPHY
Author (Corp. Body): ADE
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen | DRN | PARTICIP GmbH Consult
Year: 2010
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: EuropeAid/122888/C/SER/Multi | Request for Service: 2008/166326 | Ref. 1283
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationdemocracyenergydevelopment aidEUEuropean Commissionfinancial assistanceborder region
commerceinvestmentcooperationconstitutional statesocial assistanceUkraineenvironmenteconomic development (on national level)industrial reform
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesUkraine
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of Commission's aid delivery through Development Banks and EIB : Final report ; Volume I
Title (other): Evaluation of Commission's aid delivery through Development Banks and EIB : Final Report ; Volume IIa – Annexes 1 to 10
| Evaluation of Commission's aid delivery through Development Banks and EIB : Final report ; Volume IIb – Annexes 11
and 12 on Evaluation Methodology | Evaluation of Commission's aid delivery through Development Banks and EIB : Inventory
Note (final) | Evaluation of EC aid delivery through development banks and EIB | Evaluation of EC's aid delivery through
development banks and EIB : Ref. 1255 ; EVINFO | Fiche Contradictoire : Evaluation of the EC aid delivery through
development banks and EIB
Abstract
This evaluation commissioned by the European Commission aims at providing an overall independent assessment of its aid delivery through Development Banks and the EIB during the period 1999-2006. It concerns financial flows or “channelling” from the Commission to the aforementioned institutions and covers all geographical areas where such aid delivery took place, except for OECD countries and countries within the mandate of Directorate General Enlargement. It focuses on the funding provided by the Commission’s Directorate General for External Relations (DG RELEX), Directorate General for Development (DG DEV), and EuropeAid Co-operation Office (AIDCO) to the World Bank (WB) and the European Investment Bank (EIB).[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS OF KEY TERMS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. EVALUATION OBJECTIVES, SCOPE AND CONTEXT
1.1 EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE
1.2 OVERALL FRAMEWORK OF THE COOPERATION
1.3 INVENTORY OF FUNDS CHANNELLED
2. EVALUATION METHODOLOGY
2.1 EVALUATION PROCESS AND STRUCTURE
2.2 EVALUATION APPROACH AND INFORMATION SOURCES
2.2.1 A structured approach
2.2.2 Detailed description of the different building stones of the evaluation
2.3 CHALLENGES AND LIMITS
3. ANSWERS TO EVALUATION QUESTIONS
3.1 EVALUATION QUESTION 1 ON THE RATIONALE BEHIND THE CHANNELLING
3.1.1 Decision-making process and guidance
3.1.2 The rationale behind the channelling
3.1.3 Reasons for the observed evolution in channelled aid
3.2 EVALUATION QUESTION 2 ON SCALING UP OF AID
3.2.1 Evolution of ODA and the link with channelling
3.2.2 Facilitation of disbursement by the Commission and to the beneficiaries
3.2.3 Leverage effects of the Commission’s financial contributions and presence
3.3 EVALUATION QUESTION 3 ON RESULTS/IMPACT
3.3.1 Coherence of objectives
3.3.2 Sustainable achievement of results
3.3.3 Availability of information
3.4 EVALUATION QUESTION 4 ON EXPERTISE
3.5 EVALUATION QUESTION 5 ON COST REDUCTION & IMPLEMENTATION
3.5.1 Delays and disbursement
3.5.2 Transaction costs
3.5.3 Procedures: FA and AA
3.6 EVALUATION QUESTION 6 ON VISIBILITY AND INFLUENCE
3.6.1 Evolution of and compliance with the visibility requirements
3.6.2 Effects of visibility actions on stakeholders’ awareness
3.6.3 The Commission’s involvement through its channelling
| 3.7 EVALUATION QUESTION 7 ON COORDINATION &COMPLEMENTARITY
3.7.1 Consultation with EU MS
3.7.2 Coordination of policy dialogue
3.7.3 Coverage of beneficiaries’ needs
4. OVERALL ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSIONS
4.1 OVERALL ASSESSMENT
4.2 RATIONALE AND EVOLUTION OF AID DELIVERY THROUGH THE WB AND THE EIB
Conclusion 1: Increase in funding as intended
Conclusion 2: Strategic approach
Conclusion 3: Different use of WB and EIB
Conclusion 4: Coordination with EU MS
4.3 ADDED VALUE OF AID DELIVERY THROUGH THE WB AND THE EIB
Conclusion 5: Added value of the channelling through the WB and EIB
4.4 EFFECTIVENESS OF AID DELIVERY THROUGH THE WB AND THE EIB
Conclusion 6: Promotion of EU policies
Conclusion 7: Attainment of results
4.5 IMPLEMENTATION AND FOLLOW-UP OF AID ELIVERY THROUGH THE WB AND THE EIB
Conclusion 8: Commission’s organisational set-up
Conclusion 9: Framework Agreement
Conclusion 10: Delays and cost reduction
Conclusion 11: Single-donor WB TFs
Conclusion 12: Interaction Commission - WB
4.6 VISIBILITY
Conclusion 13: Visibility and awareness
4.7 CHANNELLING THROUGH THE EIB-WB-UN
5. RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 STRATEGY AND FRAMEWORK
5.2 ORGANISATIONAL SET-UP AND INTERACTION
5.3 MANAGEMENT TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS
5.4 VISIBILITY
| Volume IIa
Annex 1 – Terms of Reference, Launch Note and approach for an extended desk phase
Annex 2 – Evaluation Questions, Judgement Criteria, Indicators and sources of Information
Annex 3 – Description Fiches for the selection of interventions Annex 4 – Data Collection Grid for the selection of interventions
Annex 5 – Study of the EC contribution to the HIPC Initiative
Annex 6 – Survey questionnaire
Annex 7 – Survey results
Annex 8 – Country missions’ debriefing presentations
Annex 9 – List of persons met
Annex 10 – Bibliography
Author (Corp. Body): Aide à la Décision Economique
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid
Year: 2008
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Ref. 1255
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EU countriesDevelopment bankDevelopment Aidevaluationdevelopment aidEUEuropean Investment BankEuropean Commission
financial assistanceWorld Bank
Subject: Economic aid and technical assistanceAid institutionsEuropean Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of EC support to partner countries in the area of energy : Final report
Title (other): Evaluation of EC support to partner countries in the area of energy : Final report ; Annexes | Evaluation of EC support
to partner countries in the area of energy : Executive Summary | Fiche contradictoire : Evaluation of the EC support to
Partner Countries in the area of Energy ; 3d column | Quality Grid : Evaluation of EC support to Partner Countries in
the area of Energy ; Final Report | Thematic evaluation of EC support to Partner Countries in the area of energy : Ref.
1192 ; EVINFO
Abstract
This evaluation assesses the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability of the European Commission’s support to its partner countries in the energy sector. It covers interventions designed or implemented during the 1996-2007 period in all the external cooperation partner countries. This scope of the evaluation is extremely broad and heterogeneous for three major reasons.First, the European Commission’s communications analysis shows that the Commission’s interventions in the energy sector have aimed to contribute to three very different goals: - Improving access to energy in developing countries as a means of reducing poverty; - Securing energy supplies to the EU; - Improving nuclear safety in the Former Soviet Union (FSU).The first goal is increasingly perceived as an important dimension of the fight against poverty; the two others address vital stakes for European citizens. Ranking these different goals by order of importance has no real meaning. The order in which they are presented in the report has no specific significance and has deliberately been varied...[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. THE EVALUATION
1.1 MANDATE AND SCOPE
1.2 APPROACH
1.3 LIMITS OF THE EVALUATION
2. THE COMMISSION SUPPORT FOR ENERGY
2.1 THE EC STRATEGY
2.2 THE COMMISSION’S INTERVENTION PORTFOLIO IN ENERGY
3. ANSWERS TO EVALUATION QUESTIONS
3.1 RELEVANCE AND INTERNAL CONSISTENCY
3.2 EFFECTIVENESS & SUSTAINABILITY
3.3 IMPACT
3.4 EFFICIENCY
3.5 CO-ORDINATION & COMPLEMENTARITY
3.6 COHERENCE
4. CONCLUSIONS
4.1 OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF THE EC STRATEGY: A CO-OPERATION CYCLE NOT YET FORMALISED, WITH IMPORTANT CONSEQUENCES
4.2. CONCLUSIONS ALONG THE 10 STAGE OF THE CO-OPERATION CYCLE
4.3 EFFECTIVENESS AND SUSTAINABILITY: POSITIVE CONTRIBUTION TO IMPROVED SAFETY OF SEVERALL NPPS, LIMITED EFFECTS ON EU SECURITY OF SUPPLY AND ON POVERTY REDUCTION
4.4 COMMUNITY VALUE ADDED
5. RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 THE SPECIFICS OF THE ENERGY SECTOR
5.2 TWO MAJOR AREAS OF PROGRESS
5.3 ADAPTING THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION’S APPROACH
5.4 IMPROVING KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT TO ENHANCE THE COMMISSION’S LEADERSHIP
5.5 SETTING UP A KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
5.6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SUMMARISED
ANNEXES
ANNEX 1– TERMS OF REFERENCE
ANNEX 2– INTERVENTION LOGICS
ANNEX 3– STRUCTURE OF EVALUATION QUESTIONS, JUDGMENT CRITERIA AND INDICATORS
ANNEX 4– CASE STUDIES:SELECTION PROCESS AND FIGURES
ANNEX 5– THE COMMISSION’S INTERVENTIONS IN THE ENERGY SECTOR –FIGURES
ANNEX 6– THE ENERGY SECTOR: ISSUES AT STAKE AND MAIN ACTORS
ANNEX 7– THE GREEN PAPERS & THE THREE DIMENSIONS OF THE EC ENERGY DIALOGUE
ANNEX 8– FIELD VISIT NOTES
ANNEX 9– LIST OF INTERVIEWS
ANNEX 10– BIBLIOGRAPHY
Author (Corp. Body): Aide a? la De?cision Economique
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen | Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid
Year: 2008
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EU countriesEnergyDevelopment Aidpovertyevaluationenergy policyenergy supplydevelopment aid
EUEuropean Commissionnuclear power plantcooperationsecurity
Subject: Economic aid and technical assistanceEuropean Community external relationsEnergy policy. Power generation
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of Commission's external cooperation with partner countries through the organisations of the UN family :
final report ; Volume 1
Title (other): Evaluation of Commission’s external cooperation with partner countries through the organisations of the UN family :
Final Report ; Volume IIa – Annexes 1 to 9 | Evaluation of Commission’s external cooperation with partner countries
through the organisations of the UN family : Final Report ; Volume IIb – Annexes 10 to 12 on Evaluation Methodology |
Evaluation of Commission’s external cooperation with partner countries through the organisations of the UN family :
Inventory Note (final) | Fiche contradictoire : Evaluation of the Commission’s External Cooperation with partner
countries through the organisations of the UN family | Evaluation of Commission's external cooperation with partner
countries through the organisations of the UN family | Evaluation of Commission's External Cooperation with partner
countries through the organisations of the UN family : Ref. 1252 ; EVINFO
Abstract
This evaluation commissioned by the European Commission aims at providing an overall independent assessment of its external cooperation with partner countries through the organisations of the UN family. It covers the partnership between the Commission and the UN to the extent of the Commission’s funding of UN interventions. It focuses on development cooperation funds managed by DG RELEX, DEV and AIDCO. The period covered is 1999-2006.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. EVALUATION OBJECTIVES, ORGANISATION AND METHODOLOGY
1.1 EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE
1.2 EVLUATION METHODOLOGY
2. EVALUATION CONTEXT
2.1 HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF THE COMMISSION-UN PARTNERSHIP
2.2 THE EVOLUTION OF THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK
2.3 INVENTORY OF FUNDS CHANNELLED
3. ANSWERS TO EVALUATION QUESTIONS
3.1 EVALUATION QUESTION 1 ON GUIDING CRITERIA
3.2 EVALUATION QUESTION 2 ON SPECIFIC EXPERTISE
3.3 EVALUATION QUESTION 3 ON RESULTS AND IMPACT
3.4 EVALUATION QUESTION 4 ON STRENGTHENING THE UN SYSTEM
3.5 EVALUATION QUESTION 5 ON SCALING UP
3.6 EVALUATION QUESTION 6 ON VISIBILITY
3.7 EVALUATION QUESTION 7 ON IMPLEMENTATION &COST REDUCTION
3.8 EVALUATION QUESTION 8 ON LEGAL FRAMEWORK
3.9 EVALUATION QUESTION 9 ON COORDINATION AND COMPLEMENTARITY
4. CONCLUSIONS
4.1 OVERALL ASSESSMENT
4.2 GENERAL CHANNELLING FRAMEWORK
4.3 ADDED VALUE OF CHANNELLING FOR THE COMMISSION, FOR THE UN, FOR PARTNER COUNTRIES,AND AS CONVEYED BY THE COMMISSION
4.4 RESULTS & IMPACT
4.5 EFFICIENCY OF THE AID DELIVERY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK
4.6 VISIBILITY
4.7 ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE
5. RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 GENERAL CHANNELLING FRAMEWORK
5.2 EFFICIENCY OF AID DELIVERY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK
5.3 VISIBILITY
5.4 ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE
| Volume IIa Annexes 1 to 9
ANNEX 1- TERMS OF REFERENCE
ANNEX 2- THE EVALUATION QUESTIONS, JUDGEMENT CRITERIA, INDICATORS AND SOURCES OF INFORMATION
ANNEX 3– LIST OF THE SELECTED INTERVENTIONS
ANNEX 4– DESCRIPTION FICHES OF THE SELECTED INTERVENTIONS
ANNEX 5 – DATA COLLECTION GRIDS FOR EACH OF THE SELECTED INTERVENTIONS
ANNEX 6– FIELD MISSIONS DEBRIEFING PRESENTATIONS
ANNEX 7– SYNOPSIS OF ROM ANALYSIS
ANNEX 8– LIST OF PERSONS MET
ANNEX 9– BIBLIOGRAPHY
Volume IIb Annexes 10 to 12 on Evaluation Methodology
ANNEX 10–EVALUATION METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH
ANNEX 11–EVALUATION TOOLS AND CHECKLIST
ANNEX 12–PYRAMIDAL FOCUS GROUPS AND WORKING GROUPS
Author (Corp. Body): Aide a? la De?cision Economique
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid
Year: 2008
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EU countriesInternational cooperationevaluationdevelopment aidEUEuropean Commissionfinancial assistanceinternational cooperation
cooperationUNO
Subject: International cooperationEuropean Community funds and other financial instruments
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of European Commission’s Support with Egypt – Country level Evaluation : Final Report ; Volume I: Main
Report
Title (other): Evaluation of European Commission’s Support to Egypt – Country level Evaluation : Final Report ; Volume II: Annexes |
Evaluation of European Commission’s Support to Egypt – Country level Evaluation : Final Report ; Volume III:
Methodology | Fiche Contradictoire : Evaluation of the European Commission’s support to Egypt (Country level
evaluation) | Evaluation of the EC cooperation with Egypt 1998 - 2008 : Quality Grid on Final Report | Evaluation of the
European Commission's Support to Egypt : ref. 1281; EVINFO | Executive Summary : Country Strategy Evaluation – Egypt
Abstract
The evaluation of the European Commission (Commission)’s co-operation with Egypt over the period 1998-2008 has two main objectives: - to provide the relevant external Co-operation Services of the Commission and the wider public with an overall independent assessment of the Commission’s past and current cooperation relations with Egypt; and - to identify key lessons in order to improve the current and future strategies and programmes of the Commission.This evaluation undertaken in 2009 covers the Commission’s co-operation strategies with Egypt and their implementation during the period 1998-2008, focusing on their relevance, effectiveness, impact, sustainability and efficiency. Their coherence, complementarity and coordination and the Commission’s value added are also analysed. It should be noted that the analysis of the cooperation strategy is limited to the period 2002-2008 due to the unavailability of early documents whilst the CSP 2007-2013 has been taken into account for the intended effects of implementation rather than its realisations. [Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
VOLUME I – MAIN REPORT
LIST OF ACRONYMS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY IN ENGLISH AND ARABIC
1. EVALUATION OBJECTIVES, SCOPE AND CONTEXT
1.1 EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE
1.2 COOPERATION FRAMEWORK
1.2.1 Overall cooperation framework
1.2.2 Egypt-Commission’s cooperation strategy (1998-2008)
1.3 INVENTORY OF FUNDS
2. EVALUATION METHODOLOGY
2.1 EVALUATION PROCESS
2.2 EVALUATION APPROACH
2.2.1 A structured approach
2.2.2 Challenges and limits
3. ANSWERS TO EVALUATION QUESTIONS
3.1 EQ1 ON THE RATIONALE OF THE COMMISSION COOPERATION STRATEGY WITH EGYPT
3.2 EQ2 ON SYNERGIES BETWEEN COMMISSION’S INTERVENTIONS
3.3 EQ3 ON HUMAN RIGHTS, DEMOCRACY AND THE RULE OF LAW
3.4 EQ4 ON ECONOMIC TRANSITION
3.5 EQ5 ON EMPLOYMENT
3.6 EQ6 ON SOCIAL SERVICES
3.7 EQ7 ON BUDGET SUPPORT
3.8 EQ8 ON COST EFFECTIVENESS OF FINANCING MODALITIES AND IMPLEMENTATION MECHANISMS
3.9 EQ9 ON COMMISSION SUPPORT TO EGYPT IN THE WIDER COOPERATION CONTEXT
4. OVERALL ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSIONS
4.1 OVERALL ASSESSMENT
4.2 CONCLUSIONS
4.2.1 Relevance of the cooperation strategy
4.2.2 Intervention outputs, outcomes and likely impacts
4.2.3 Efficiency of implementation and financing modalities
4.2.4 Political and policy dialogues
5. RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 IMPROVE THE PROGRAMMING PROCESS
5.2 IMPROVE THE IDENTIFICATION AND FORMULATION PROCESSES
5.3 IMPROVE THE MONITORING PROCESS
| Volume II
LIST OF ANNEXES
ANNEXE 1 - TOR
ANNEXE 2- EVALUATION QUESTIONS,JUDGEMENT CRITERIA AND INDICATORS
ANNEXE 3 - NATIONAL BACKGROUND
ANNEXE 4 - COMMISSION-EGYPT COOPERATION CONTEXT AND IMPLEMENTATION
ANNEXE 5 - LIST OF COMMISSION’S INTERVENTIONS
ANNEXE 6 - SELECTED INTERVENTIONS IN BRIEF
ANNEXE 7 - DATA COLLECTION GRID
ANNEXE 8 - DEBRIEFING PRESENTATION OF FINDINGS
ANNEXE 9 - ANALYSIS OF ROM REPORTS
ANNEXE 10 - SCHEMATIC PRESENTATION OF EVALUATION PROCESS
ANNEXE 11 - LIST OF PERSONS MET
ANNEXE 12 - BIBLIOGRAPHY
VOLUME III
PART 1: OVERALL METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH
1.1 EVALUATION PROCESS AND STRUCTURE
1.2 EVALUATION APPROACH AND INFORMATION SOURCES
1.2.1 A structured approach
1.2.2 Detailed description of the different building stones of the evaluation
1.3 CHALLENGES AND LIMITS
PART 2: INTERVENTION LOGIC
2.1 GLOBAL IMPACT
2.2 INTERMEDIATE IMPACTS
2.3 OUTCOMES
2.4 ACTIVITIES AND OUTPUTS
PART 3: EVALUATION TOOLS AND CHECK LISTS
Author (Corp. Body): Aide a? la De?cision Economique, Ottignies Louvain la Neuve
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen | Development Researchers Network | PARTICIP GmbH,
Year: 2010
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: EuropeAid/122888/C/SER/Multi | Request for Service: 2008/166326 | ref. 1281
Language: en | ara
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: Egyptimpactemployment policyevaluationdemocracydevelopment aiddevelopment aid policyEU
European Commissionfinancial assistancebudgetary policycooperationhuman rightsconstitutional statesocial serviceseconomic policy
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesEgypt
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of European Commission’s Cooperation with El Salvador – Country level Evaluation : Final Report ; Volume 1:
Main report
Title (other): Evaluation of European Commission’s Cooperation with El Salvador – Country level Evaluation : Final Report ; Volume 2:
Annexes | Fiche Contradictoire : Evaluation of the EC Cooperation with El Salvador ; 1998 - 2008 | Evaluation of the EC
cooperation with El Salvador 1998 - 2008 : Quality Grid on Final Report | Evaluation of the Commission’s support to El
Salvador 1998 - 2008 : Ref. 1274 ; EVINFO
Abstract
This evaluation assesses the European Commission’s (EC) cooperation with El Salvador over the period 1998-2008. It aims at providing an overall independent assessment of the entire EC cooperation strategy and support in the country and to provide key lessons to improve current and future EC strategies and programmes.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
ACRONYMS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
MAPS
1. OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE
1.1 OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION
1.2 STRUCTURE OF THE REPORT
2. CONTEXT
2.1 NATIONAL BACKGROUND
2.2 EC COOPERATION FRAMEWORK
2.3 EC INTERVENTION LOGIC
2.4 EC FUNDING–INVENTORY
2.5 OTHER DONORS’ COOPERATION
3. METHODOLOGY
3.1 EVALUATION PROCESS
3.2 DATA COLLECTION
3.3 CHALLENGES AND LIMITS
4. ANSWERS TO THE EVALUATION QUESTIONS
4.1 EQ 1 ON RELEVANCE AND ALIGNMENT
4.2 EQ 2 ON EDUCATION AND SOCIAL VIOLENCE
4.3 EQ 3 ON SOCIAL SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE
4.4 EQ 4 ON MSE DEVELOPMENT
4.5 EQ 5 ON BUDGET SUPPORT
4.6 EQ 6 ON EFFICIENCY
4.7 EQ 7 ON CROSS-CUTTING ISSUES
4.8 EQ 8 ON COHERENCE, COORDINATION AND COMPLEMENTARITY
5. CONCLUSIONS AND LESSONS LEARNT
5.1 CONCLUSIONS
5.2 LESSONS LEARNT
6. RECOMMENDATIONS
| VOLUME 2: ANNEXES
ANNEXE 1- TERMS OF REFERENCE
ANNEXE 2- LAUNCH NOTE AND REVISED OFFER (MAIN ELEMENTS)
ANNEXE 3- INTERVENTION LOGIC
ANNEXE 4- EVALUATION QUESTIONS, JUDGEMENT CRITERIA AND INDICATORS
ANNEXE 5- NATIONAL BACKGROUND
ANNEXE 6- EC-EL SALVADOR COOPERATION CONTEXT AND IMPLEMENTATION
ANNEXE 7- LIST OF EC INTERVENTIONS
ANNEXE 8- INTERVENTIONS IN BRIEF
ANNEXE 9- DATA COLLECTION GRID
ANNEXE 10- LIST OF PERSONS MET
ANNEXE 11- BIBLIOGRAPHY
Author (Corp. Body): Aide a? la De?cision Economique, Ottignies Louvain la Neuve
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen | Development Researchers Net
Year: 2010
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: EuropeAid/122888/C/SER/Multi | Request for Service: 2008/166326 | Ref. 1274
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationeducationEl Salvadordevelopment aidEUEuropean Commissionfinancial assistanceviolence
infrastructurecooperationsocial servicesbusiness management
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesEl Salvador
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Rapport Annuel Conjoint 2005 sur la mise en œuvre des actions de coopération dans le cadre de l'accord de partenariat
ACP-UE au Burkina Faso
Author (Corp. Body): Burkina Faso Ministère de l'Economie et des Finances / Direction Génèrale de la Cooperation | Europäische Kommission / Delegation in Burkina Faso
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen
Year: 2007
Language: fr
Ressource: Einzelne Arbeitspapiere, Preprints
Keyword: Development AidInternational cooperation
Subject: Development aid. Aid programmes and aid organizationsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Burkina Faso
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu)
Title: Rapport Annuel Conjoint 2007 : Côte d'Ivoire
Author (Corp. Body): Cellule de Coordination de la Cooperation CI/UE | Europäische Kommission / Delegation an der Elfenbeinküste
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen
Year: 2008
Language: fr
Ressource: Einzelne Arbeitspapiere, Preprints
Keyword: Development AidInternational cooperation
Subject: Development aid. Aid programmes and aid organizationsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Ivory Coast
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu) | Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document
Title: Evaluation of the Commission's support to the Region of Eastern and Southern Africa and the Indian Ocean : Regional
Level Evaluation ; Final Report ; Volume 1
Title (other): Evaluation of the Commission's support to the Region of Eastern and Southern Africa and the Indian Ocean : Regional
Level Evaluation ; Final Report ; Volume 2 | Evaluation of the Commission's support to the Region of Eastern and
Southern Africa and the Indian Ocean : Regional Level Evaluation ; Final Report ; Volume 3 | Fiche contradictoire :
Evaluation of the Commission’s co-operation with the region of Eastern and Southern Africa and the Indian Ocean (ESA -
IO) | Quality grid: Evaluation of the Commission's support to the Region of Eastern and Southern Africa and the Indian
Ocean ; Regional Level Evaluation | Evaluation of the Commission’s support to the region of Eastern and Southern Africa
and the Indian Ocean : Ref. 1257 ; EVINFO
Abstract
The central scope of the evaluation is the Commission’s co-operation strategy with the region of Eastern and Southern Africa and the Indian Ocean (ESA-IO) and its implementation for the period 1996-2007 with the objective of: -providing the European Commission’s relevant external cooperation services and the wider public with an overall assessment of the Commission’s past and current cooperation relations with the ESA-IO region; -identifying key lessons in order to improve the current and future strategies and programmes of the Commission. The evaluation concentrates on four focal areas. Three of these - namely Regional Economic Integration and Trade, Transport and Communications, and Natural Resources Management - are also focal sectors of the Commission’s support to the ESA-IO region while the fourth sector - Conflict Prevention, Resolution and Management - has been included in view of the ESA-IO region’s instability and of the importance of a peaceful and stable environment for the attainment of the specific and overall objectives of the interventions envisaged. The evaluation was supervised by the Joint Evaluation Unit and benefited from advice provided by the members of the Reference Group.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
1 THE EVALUATION
1.1 FRAMEWORK OF THE EVALUATION
1.2 SCOPE AND OBJECTIVES OF THE EVALUATION
1.3 EVALUATION METHOD AND LIMITATIONS
2 THE ESA-IO REGIONAL CONTEXT
2.1 THE ESA-IO SOCIO-ECONOMIC CONTEXT
2.2 THE ESA-IO REGIONAL ORGANISATIONS
3 SUPPORT TO THE ESA-IO REGION
3.1 EC STRATEGY IN THE ESA-IO REGION (1996-2007)
3.2 IMPLEMENTATION OF EC DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT IN THE ESA-IO REGION
3.2.1 Implementation under the 8th and 9th EDF RIPs
3.2.2 EC Development Support in the ES A-IO Region at Country level
3.3 OTHER DONORS
3.4 LOGIC OF EC SUPPORT
4 MAIN FINDINGS
4.1 EQ 1: RELEVANCE &COHERENCE OF THE OVERALL STRATEGY AND INSTITUTIONAL STRUCTURE
4.2 EQ 2: RIOS OWNERSHIP
4.3 EQ 3: COORDINATION AND COMPLEMENTARITY
4.4 EQ 4: REGIONAL INTEGRATION AND TRADE
4.5 EQ 5: TRANSPORT AND COMMUNICATIONS
4.6 EQ 6: NATURAL RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
4.7 EQ 7: CONFLICT PREVENTION, RESOLUTION AND MANAGEMENT
4.8 EQ 8: IMPACT
5 OVERALL ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSIONS
5.1 OVERALL ASSESSMENT
5.2 CONCLUSIONS
6 RECOMMENDATIONS
Volume 2
ANNEX 1: TERMS OF REFERENCE
ANNEX 2: BIBLIOGRAPHY
ANNEX 3: LIST OF PEOPLE INTERVIEWED
ANNEX4: OVERVIEW OF EVALUATION METHOD & PROCESS
ANNEX5: ESA IO REGIONAL CONTEXT &EC STRATEGY BY SECTOR
ANNEX6: EVALUATION MATRIX
ANNEX 7: JUDGMENT CRITERIA FORMS
ANNEX 8: SYNTHESIS OF FOCUS GROUPS
ANNEX 9: LIST OF PROJECTS SPECIFICALLY CONSIDERED AND PROJECT ASSESSMENT FICHES
| Volume 3
ANNEX 1: INVENTORY OF REGIONAL PROJECTS 8TH AND 9TH EDF FOR THE ESA-IO REGION
ANNEX 2: INVENTORY OF NATIONAL PROJECTS 8TH AND 9TH EDF FOR THE ESA-IO REGION
ANNEX 2A: BREAKDOWN OF NIP/NATIONAL PROJECTS PROGRAMMED AMOUNTS BY SECTOR FOR EACH ESA-IO COUNTRY
ANNEX 2B: SELECTED NATIONAL PROJECTS FUNDED UNDER OTHER EC BUDGET LINES
ANNEX 3: INVENTORY OF REGIONAL PROJECTS FUNDED BY OTHER DONORS IN THE ESA-IO REGION
Author (Corp. Body): Develoment Researchers' Network
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen | Aide a? la De?cision Econom
Year: 2008
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Ref. 1257
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationdevelopment aidEUEuropean CommissioncommerceIndian Oceancommunicationconflict
conflict managementconflict managementcooperationEast Africapreventionregional developmentresourcesSouthern Africatransportationeconomic development (on national level)
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesEastern Africa. General ResourcesSouthern Africa. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Synthesis of the geographical evaluations managed by the Evaluation Unit during the period 1998-2006 : Final report
Abstract
The main objectives of this synthesis of the geographical evaluations managed during the period 1998-2006 by the Joint Evaluation Unit (JEU) and the Delegations of the European Union in partner countries were as follows: i.to show the evolution of the Commission’s methodological approach to geographical evaluations; ii.to analyse, on the basis of the most recent evaluation reports, the accuracy of the use made by the evaluators of the JEU’s methodological approach, using the information on the JEU’s website as a benchmark ; and iii.to provide a synthesis of the conclusions and recommendations of the reports (focusing mainly on wider lessons drawn out with the specific aim of sharing knowledge).[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
PART ONE: METHODOLOGY
i) The evaluation’s mandate
ii) Methodology and limits
a. Methodology
b. Risks and limitations
PART TWO: FINDINGS
I) EVALUATION REPORTS ASSESSMENT
JEU’s methodological guidance: consistency of the message, more formal requirements since 2001
Inventory of geographical evaluations: a slight stabilisation of the methodology
Regarding the conformity of evaluations to the JEU’s methodological approach
II) SUMMARY OF THE EVALUATIONS’ MAIN CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS REVIEW OF EVALUATIONS
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Content of the review of evaluations
1.2 Mandate and scope of the study
1.3 Methodology of the study
1.4 Risks and limitations
2 EVOLUTION OF THE COMMISSION’S METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH
2.1 Objectives
2.2 Approach
2.3 Observations
2.4 Conclusion
3 INVENTORY OF GEOGRAPHICAL EVALUATIONS
3.1 Objectives
3.2 Approach
3.3 Analysis
3.4 Conclusion
4 CONFORMITY OF EVALUATIONS TO THE JEU’S METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH
4.1 Objectives
4.2 Approach
4.3 Observations
4.3.1 Group 1: adequacy in respect of conformity with the ToR
Criterion 1.1: Meeting needs
Criterion 1.2: Relevant scope
4.3.2 Group 2: credibility of the reports
Criterion 2.1: Defensible design
Criterion 2.2: Reliable data
Criterion 2.3 Sound analysis
Criterion 2.4: Credible findings
Criterion 2.5: Validity of Conclusions and Recommendations
4.3.3 Group 3: quality of communication
Criterion 3.1: Clarity of the report
Criterion 3.2: Usefulness of the report
4.3.4 Conclusion
5 SUMMARY OF THE EVALUATIONS’ MAIN CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Objectives and method
| 5.2 Synthesis
5.2.1 Strategy
Adequacy with country/regional needs and evolution over time
Quality of the strategy
5.2.2 Thematic coverage
Private sector and SMEs
Public Finances and Macroeconomic framework
Governance
Rural development
Transport
Social sectors
Regional integration
5.2.3 Cross-cutting issues
Gender
Environment
5.2.4 Implementation
Aid delivery mechanisms
Donor coordination and complementarity
7 Monitoring and Evaluation
ANNEXES
ANNEX 1 - TERMS OF REFERENCE
ANNEX 2 – BIBLIOGRAPHY
Evaluation reports:
Terms of Reference
Guidelines:
Usefulness of the report:
ANNEX 3 – CHRONAGRAM OF ToR evolution
ANNEX 4 – MAIN ISSUES TO EVALUATE AS QUOTED IN THE ToR
ANNEX 5 – INVENTORY OF GEOGRAPHICAL EVALUATIONS
ANNEX 6 – TABLE OF CONFORMITY ASSESSMENT – for more information see the excel table in “soft” annexes
ANNEX 7 - TABLE OF CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
Author (Corp. Body): Develoment Researchers' Network
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen | Aide a? la De?cision Econom
Year: 2008
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationdevelopment aid policyEUEuropean Commissiongeographical factorsadvantages
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Global ResourcesEurope. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation de la strategie regionale de la CE en Afrique de L'Ouest : Rapport final de Synthèse ; Volume 1
Title (other): Evaluation de la strategie regionale de la CE en Afrique de L'Ouest : Rapport final de Synthèse ; Volume 3 Inventaire |
Evaluation de la strategie regionale de la CE en Afrique de L'Ouest : Rapport final de Synthèse ; Volume 2 Annexes |
Evaluation de la strategie regionale de la CE en Afrique de L'Ouest : Fiche contradictoire | Evaluation de la
coopération régionale de la CE en Afrique de l'Ouest : Grille de Qualité du Rapport Définitif | Evaluation de la
coopération de la Commission Européenne avec la région Afrique de l'Ouest : Ref. 1253 ; EVINFO
Abstract
L'Unité commune d’Evaluation a été mandaté d'entreprendre une évaluation de la coopération de la Commission avec la Région de l’Afrique de l'Ouest. Cette évaluation correspond à la politique interne de la Commission Européenne selon laquelle toutes les stratégies pays/région doivent être évaluées régulièrement. L'objectif spécifique de cette évaluation est de fournir à la Commission les résultats de l'aide et de tirer les leçons-clés de l'expérience (1996-2007, c’est-à-dire pendant la durée des FED 8 et 9) de sa coopération avec la Région de l’Afrique de l'Ouest. En tenant compte du cadre politique, économique, social et environnemental de la région, l’évaluation présente des analyses et conclusions, avec un ensemble de recommandations détaillées et opérationnelles, dans un rapport conçu principalement pour fournir aux responsables politiques et aux responsables de la Commission une aide à la définition de la stratégie de coopération future et à sa mise en œuvre.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
0 RESUME EXECUTIF
0.1 ENJEUX ET OBJECTIFS DE L’EVALUATION
0.2 CONTEXTE REGIONAL DE L’EVALUATION
0.3 METHODOLOGIE SUIVIE
0.4 APERÇU GENERAL
0.5 PRINCIPALES CONCLUSIONS
0.6 RECOMMANDATIONS PRINCIPALES
1 EVALUATION DE LA COOPERATION REGIONALE DE LA CE EN AFRIQUE DE L’OUEST
1.1. CADRE DE L’EVALUATION
1.2. OBJECTIF DE L’EVALUATION
1.3. CHAMP D’EVALUATION : STRATEGIE SUR PLUSIEURS CYCLES
1.4. THEMATIQUE DES INTERVENTIONS DE CONCENTRATION
1.5. CHOIX DES PROGRAMMES ET PROJETS
1.6. QUESTIONS D’EVALUATION ET HYPOTHESES DE L’INTERVENTION
1.7. INSTRUMENTS DE COLLECTE DES DONNEES
1.8. ANALYSE DES DONNEES
1.9. PAYS VISITES ET CRITERES DE CHOIX
1.10. LIMITES DE L’EVALUATION1.11. PROCESSUS D’EVALUATION ET RAPPORT DE SYNTHESE
2 LE CONTEXTE DE LA REGION AFRIQUE DE L’OUEST
2.1 APERÇU GEOGRAPHIQUE ET SOCIO-ECONOMIQUE
2.2 LES INSTITUTIONS D’INTEGRATION REGIONALE
2.3 INTERVENTION COMMUNAUTAIRE (CE) DANS LA REGION
2.3.1 LES STRATEGIES REGIONALES POUR L’AFRIQUE OCCIDENTALE (PIR)
2.3.2 LES STRATEGIES NATIONALES POUR L’AFRIQUE OCCIDENTALE (PIN)
2.3.3 LES AUTRES FINANCEMENTS DE LA CE ENAFRIQUE OCCIDENTALE
2.3.4 ENGAGEMENTS VERSUS MISE EN ŒUVRE DE LA CE DANS LA REGION
2.4 LE RETARD DANS LA PROGRAMMATION
2.5 INTERVENTION DES AUTRES BAILLEURS DE FONDS DANS LA REGION
2.5.1 BANQUE EUROPEENNE D’INVESTISSEMENTS - BEI– FED ET NON FED
2.5.2 AUTRES INTERVENTIONS REGIONALES, Y COMPRIS PROGRAMMES CONJOINTS
3 REPONSES AUX QUESTIONS D’EVALUATION
3.1 QE1 : EN TENANT COMPTE DES PRIORITES ET SPECIFICITES DE L’AIDE EUROPEENNE, DANS QUELLE MESURE LA STRATEGIE REGIONALE DE LA COMMISSION EUROPEENNE REPOND - ELLE AUX BESOINS SPECIFIQUES DE LA REGION?
3.2 QE 2 : COMMENT ET DANS QUELLE MESURE LA CE A-T-ELLE EU UNE INFLUENCE SUR LE RENFORCEMENT DES CADRES INSTITUTIONNELS REGIONAUX (CEDEAO ET UEMOA) EN VUE DE LA CONSOLIDATION DURABLE DE L'ESPACE ECONOMIQUE REGIONAL?
| 3.3 QE 3 : QUELS ONT ETE LES MECANISMES/ MESURES ADOPTES - ET AVEC QUELLE EFFICACITE - POUR ASSURER LA COORDINATION AVEC LES AUTRES BAILLEURS DE FONDS ET LES ETATS MEMBRES LES PLUS ENGAGES DANS LA REGION? 3.4 QE4 : DANS QUELLE MESURE LES INTERVENTIONS DE LA COMMISSION EUROPEENNE ONT - ELLES PERMIS DE RENFORCER DURABLEMENT L’INTEGRATION DE L’ESPACE ECONOMIQUE REGIONAL?
3.5 QE5 : LES INTERVENTIONS DE LA CE ONT - ELLES PERMIS DE CONTRIBUER (ET DANS QUELLE MESURE) A L’AMELIORATION DES SERVICES REGIONAUX DE TRANSPORT EN VUE DE DIMINUER LE COUT DES FACTEURS ET DE FACILITER LA LIBRE CIRCULATION DES PERSONNES ET DES MARCHANDISES?
3.6 QE 6 : QUELS ONT ETE LES EFFETS DES ACTIONS DE LA CE EN FAVEUR DE LA PREVENTION DES CONFLITS ET DE LA GESTION DE CES DERNIERS DANS LA REGION? CES ACTIONS PROMETTENT - ELLES D’AVOIR UN EFFET DURABLE BIEN QUE LEUR ORIGINE SOIT PLUTOT RECENTE?
3.7 QE 7 : DANS QUELLE MESURE LA MISE EN ŒUVRE DES PROGRAMMES REGIONAUX A-T-ELLE PRIS EN COMPTE LES EFFETS SUR L’ENVIRONNEMENT?
3.8 QE8: LES RESSOURCES ORGANISATIONNELLES (HUMAINES, FINANCIERES, ADMINISTRATIVES,D’INFORMATION ET LES SYSTEMES ET PROCESSUS DE GESTION) MISES A LA DISPOSITION DES PARTIES PRENANTES POUR ASSURER UNE BONNE PROGRAMMATION ET EXECUTION DES INTERVENTIONS SONT-ELLES ADEQUATES ET PERFORMANTES?
4 CONCLUSIONS
4.1 CONCLUSIONS PAR MACRO-THEMES
4.2 CONCLUSIONS DECOULANT DES QUESTIONS EVALUATIVES
5 RECOMMANDATIONS
5.1 RECOMMANDATIONS PAR META-THÈME
5.2 RECOMMANDATIONS PAR QUESTION ÉVALUATIVE
5.3 PRIORITÉ DES RECOMMANDATIONS ET LIENS LOGIQUES ENTRE EUX
| Volume II
ANNEXE 1 : TERMES DE RÉFÉRENCE DE L’ÉVALUATION
ANNEXE 2 : RÉFÉRENCES BIBLIOGRAPHIQUES
ANNEXE 3 : GROUPE DE RÉFÉRENCE ET PERSONNES RENCONTRÉES
ANNEXE 4 : METHODOLOGIE
1 PROCESSUS D’ÉVALUATION ET RAPPORT DE SYNTHÈSE
2 METHODOLOGIE POUR LA PHASE DE TERRAIN
3 LIMITES DE L’ÉVALUATION
ANNEXE 5 : CONTEXTE DE LA COOPERATION REGIONALE EN AFRIQUE DE L’OUEST
1 DÉVELOPPEMENT SOCIO-ÉCONOMIQUE
2 ANALYSE POLITIQUE
3 SECTEUR PRIVÉ ET COMMERCE
4 LES INSTITUTIONS D’INTÉGRATION RÉGIONALE
5 CARACTÉRISTIQUES DE L’AIDE AU DÉVELOPPENT DE LA RÉGION
6 APERÇU DE L’APPUI DES AUTRES BAILLEURS DE FONDS
ANNEXE 6 : STATISTIQUES DES EXPORTATIONS DES PAYS DE LA REGION, 1997-2006
ANNEXE 7 : LOGIQUE D’INTERVENTION
1 SURVOL DE LA LOGIQUE D’INTERVENTION DE LA COMMISSION DANS LA RÉGION
2 ANALYSE DE LA LOGIQUE D’INTERVENTION DES FED 8 ET 9
ANNEXE 8 : MATRICE D’EVALUATION
ANNEXE 9 : ANALYSE QUANTITATIVE DE LA COOPERATION AU DEVELOPPEMENT REGIONAL DE L’AFRIQUE OCCIDENTALE
1 APPROCHE QUANTITATIVE DES INTERVENTIONS
2 ENGAGEMENTS DE LA CE DANS LA RÉGION
3 ENGAGEMENTS DANS LA RÉGION PAR BAILLEUR DE FOND
4 META-CONCLUSIONS DE L’ANALYSE QUANTITATIVE
ANNEXE 10 : ANALYSE DU SECTEUR TRANSPORT ET FICHES ANALYTIQUES DE PROJETS SELECTIONNES DANS CE DOMAINE
1 INTRODUCTION
2 ANALYSE DES BESOINS, OPPORTUNITES ET MENACES DU SECTEUR
3 LES STRATEGIES DE COOPERATION DE LA CE DANS LE DOMAINE DU TRANSPORT EN AFRIQUE DE L’OUEST
4 RÉPONSE DETAILLÉE À LA QUESTION D’EVALUATION 5
Volume III
ANNEXE 11 : INVENTAIRE DES INTERVENTIONS DE LA CE EN AFRIQUE DE L’OUEST, 1996-2006 (CRIS)
Author (Corp. Body): Development Researchers' Network
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen | Aide a? la De?cision Econom
Year: 2008
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Ref. 1253
Language: fr
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: Africaevaluationdevelopment aidEUfreedom of movementcommercecooperationregional development
environmental policytrafficeconomic development (on national level)
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIBEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesWestern Africa. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Region Level Evaluation Overseas Countries and Territories (OCT) : Final Report ; Volume I: Main Report
Title (other): Region Level Evaluation Overseas Countries and Territories (OCT) : Final Report ; Volume II: Annexes | Evaluation of the
EU Cooperation with OCTs : Fiche Contradictoire ; Ref. Ares(2013)2483870 | Evaluation of the EC cooperation with the
OCT's/PTOM : Final Report | Evaluation of the EU Cooperation with Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTS) : Abstract ;
EvInfo
Abstract
This evaluation covers the strategies of the European Union (EU) for co-operation with the Overseas Countries and Territories (OCTs) and their implementation 1999–2009, including the intended effects under the current programming cycle 2008-2013, in relation to the territorial Single Programming Documents of the 8th, 9th and 10th European Development Fund (EDF), the Partnership Agreement with Greenland and contributions from other co-operation instruments.The main objectives of this evaluation are: To provide the external co-operation Services of the Commission of the European Union (further referred to as “Commission”) and the wider public with an overall independent assessment of the EU’s past and current co-operation relations with the OCTs; To identify key lessons in order to improve the current and future strategies and programmes of the Commission.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 Introduction
1.1 Objectives of the Evaluation
1.2 Context of EU - OCT co-operation
1.2.1 Characteristics of the OCTs
1.2.2 Evolution of the European Commission’s co-operation with the OCTs
1.3 Scope of Evaluation
2 Objectives and Structure of the Report
3 Overall Strategy and Methods for Analyses
4 Cooperation Modalities and Funding
4.1 General
4.2 Framework conditions for regional co-operation and integration
4.3 Efficiency of Disbursement
4.4 The Intervention Logic of Country Strategy and IP of the 8th, 9th and 10th EDF . 304.4.1 Synthesis of the ex-ante Intervention Logic
4.4.2 Summary of the main elements of the Intervention Logic
5 Evaluation Questions and Answers
5.1 Coverage of Evaluation questions
5.2 Evaluation Question 1: Relevance and Internal Coherence of Support
5.3 Evaluation Question 2: General Efficiency of Support
5.4 Evaluation Question 3: Transport, Connectivity and Energy
5.5 Evaluation Question 4: Education and Vocational Training
5.6 Evaluation Question 5: Environment
5.7 Evaluation Question 6: Regional Integration
5.8 Evaluation Question 7: EU Core Values
5.9 Evaluation Question 8: Coherence, Coordination and Added Value
6 Conclusions
6.1 Principal Conclusions
6.2 Complementary Conclusions
6.3 Sector Specific Conclusions
6.4 Overall assessment of the EU support for the OCTs (1999-2009)
7 Recommendations
7.1 General recommendations related to future EU-OCT relations
7.2 General recommendation related to existing aid modalities and co-operation
7.3 Sector specific recommendations
| Volume II
Annex I: Terms of Reference
Annex II: OCT Specific Context
OCT linked with Denmark: Greenland
1. Overview
2. Legal status
3. EC relations with Greenland
OCTs linked with France
1. Overview
2. Legal status
3. EC activities in individual OCTs
OCT linked with the Netherlands
1. Overview
2. Legal Status
3. EC activities in individual OCTs
OTs linked with the UK
1. Overview
2. Legal Status
3. EC activities in individual OTs
Annex III: Intervention Logics for 8th, 9th and 10th EDF
Annex IV: Association of Overseas Countries and Territories of the EU (OCTA)
Annex V: Information Matrix
Evaluation Question 1: Relevance & Internal Coherence of Support
Evaluation Question 2: General Efficiency of Support
Evaluation Question 3: Transport, Connectivity & Energy
Evaluation Question 4: Education & Vocational Training
Evaluation Question 5: Environment
Evaluation Question 6: Regional Integration
Evaluation Question 7: EU Core Values
Evaluation Question 8: Concept of Membership of the Same Family
Annex VI: TAO Questionnaire
Annex VII: Extract of Responses to TAO questionnaire
Annex VIII: Interview Guides
Annex IX: List of Persons Met
Annex X: Bibliography
Annex XI: Inventory of EC Projects/ Programmes
Projects per sector
Regional Projects and Projects Per OCT
Annex XII: Methodology Applied
1. Overall Strategy and Methods for Analyses
2. Field Phase Methodology
Annex XIII: Powerpoint Slides for Presentation at OCTA Forum
Author (Corp. Body): ECO Consult
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Auswärtige Beziehungen | Arbeitsgemeinschaft Entwicklungspolitischer Gutachter | APRI |
Year: 2011
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract No EVA 2007/geo-acp | Ref. Ares(2013)2483870
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: vocational educationevaluationeducational policyenergy policydevelopment aiddevelopment aid policyEUcooperation
program planningregional integrationenvironmental policytransportation policy
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Global ResourcesEurope. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Country Level Evaluation Nigeria : Final Report ; Volume I: Main Report
Title (other): Country Level Evaluation Nigeria : Final Report ; Volume II: Annexes | Fiche Contradictoire : Evaluation of the European
Commission's cooperation with Nigeria (Country level evaluation) | Quality Grid : Evaluation of the European
Commission's support to Nigeria ; Final report | Evaluation of the Commission’s support to Nigeria : Ref. 1276 ; EVINFO
| Country Level Evaluation Nigeria : Final Report ; Executive Summary
Abstract
This report covers the evaluation of the cooperation strategy of the EC with the Federal Republic of Nigeria and its implementation in relation to the Country Strategies and National Indicative Programmes of the 7th and 9th European Development Funds(EDF) as well as to contributions from thematic budget lines and other cooperation instruments.The main objectives of this evaluation are: To provide the external cooperation Services of the EC and the wider public with an overall independent assessment of the Commission’s past and current cooperation programme with Nigeria;To identify key lessons learned from the past cooperation with Nigeria with a view to improving the current and future strategies and programmes of the Commission.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
1 Introduction
1.1 Objectives and Scope of the Evaluation
1.2 Evaluation Methodology
1.2.1 Overall Evaluation Procedure
1.2.2 Methodology of the Desk Study
1.2.3 Field Study Methodology
1.2.4 Data Collection Methods and Tools
1.2.5 Limitations of the Evaluation and team response
1.2.6 Relations between desk study and field study
1.3 Report Structure
2 Context of the Evaluation
2.1 Overview of Development Cooperation with Nigeria
2.2 EC Cooperation with Nigeria
2.2.1 Objectives
2.2.2 Approach
2.2.3 Choice of Focal States and Focal Sectors
2.2.4 Funding allocation
3 Answers to the Evaluation Questions
3.1 EQ 1: Strategy Relevance & Design
3.1.1 Background
3.1.2 Findings
3.1.3 Overall Answer to the EQ
3.2 EQ 2: Efficiency
3.2.1 Background
3.2.2 Findings
3.2.3 Overall Answer to the EQ
3.3 EQ 3 Focal Sector 1: Water Supply and Sanitation
3.3.1 Background
3.3.2 Findings
3.3.3 Overall Answer to the EQ
3.4 EQ 4 Focus Sector 2: Institutional and Economic Reform
3.4.1 Background
3.4.2 Findings
3.4.3 Overall Answer to the EQ
3.5 EQ 5 Immunisation
3.5.1 Background
3.5.2 Findings
3.5.3 Overall Answer to the EQ
3.6 EQ 6 Democracy & Rule of Law
3.6.1 Background
3.6.2 Findings
3.6.3 Overall Answer to the EQ
3.7 EQ 7 Regional Integration
3.7.1 Background
3.7.2 Findings
3.7.3 Overall Answer to the EQ
3.8 EQ 8 Civil Society Strengthening
3.8.1 Background
3.8.2 Findings
3.8.3 Overall Answer to the EQ
3.9 EQ 9 Micro projects
3.9.1 Background
3.9.2 Findings
3.9.3 Overall Answer to the EQ
3.10 EQ 10 “3Cs”
3.10.1 Background
3.10.2 Findings
3.10.3 Overall Answer to the EQ
4 Conclusions
4.1 Principal Conclusions
4.2 Further Conclusions
5 Recommendations
5.1 Principal Recommendations
5.2 General Operational Recommendations
5.3 Sector Specific Recommendations
5.4 Recommendation related to regional integration
| 5.4 Recommendation related to regional integration
Volume II
ANNEX 1 Terms of Reference
ANNEX 2 The Nigeria background
ANNEX 3 The EC Cooperation with Nigeria
ANNEX 4 Evaluation Methodology
ANNEX 5 Information Matrix
ANNEX 6 List of Persons/ Institutions Met
ANNEX 7 Mission Calendar
ANNEX 8 Focus Group Minutes
ANNEX 9 Bibliography
ANNEX 10 Inventory of EC-Projects/Programmes in Nigeria
ANNEX 11 Powerpoint Presentation
ANNEX 12 Minutes of the seminar in Abuja
Author (Corp. Body): ECO Consult
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen | AGEG | APRI | Euronet | Ins
Year: 2010
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract No EVA 2007/geo-acp | Ref. 1276
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: impactevaluationdemocratizationdevelopment aidEUEuropean Commissionfinancial assistancehealth policy
Nigeriaplanningconstitutional stateregional integrationeconomics of water supply and distributionindustrial reformcivil society
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIBEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesNigeria
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation conjointe de la cooperation de la Commission Europeenne et de la cooperation de l'Espagne avec le Senegal :
Evaluation de Niveau national ; Rapport Final ; Volume 1 Rapport Principal
Title (other): Evaluation conjointe de la cooperation de la Commission Europeenne et de la cooperation de l'Espagne avec le Senegal :
Evaluation de Niveau national ; Rapport Final ; Volume 2 Annexes: Tome 1 | Evaluation conjointe de la cooperation de la
Commission Europeenne et de la cooperation de l'Espagne avec le Senegal : Evaluation de Niveau national ; Rapport Final
; Volume 2 Annexes: Tome 2 | Joint Evaluation on the Co - operation of the European Commission and Spain with Senegal :
Fiche contradictoire | Evaluation de la coopération de la Commission européenne avec le Sénégal : Observations et
grille de jugement relatives à la qualité du rapport final | Evaluation conjointe de la coopération de la Commission
Européenne et de la coopération de l' Espagne avec le Sénégal : ref. 1284 ; EVINFO
Abstract
Ce rapport présente les résultats de l’évaluation conjointe réalisée par la Commission Européenne (CE) et l’Espagne sur leurs coopérations respectives avec le Sénégal. Les principaux objectifs de l’évaluation sont defournir aux services concernés ainsi qu’au grand public une appréciation indépendante de la coopération passée et présente avec le Sénégal et detirer les enseignements de cette coopération en vue d’améliorer les stratégies et programmes actuels et futurs de la Commission et de l’Espagne. L’évaluation porte sur les stratégies de coopération avec le Sénégal et leur mise en œuvre au cours de la période 1996-2008.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
1 Introduction
1.1. Cadre, objectif et champ de l’évaluation
1.2. Méthodologie de l’évaluation
1.2.1. Phases successives de l’évaluation
1.2.2. Diagrammes de la logique d’intervention de la CE et de l’Espagne
1.2.3. Questions d’évaluation, critères de jugement et indicateurs
1.2.4. Processus de collecte et d’analyse des données
1.2.5. Limites de l’évaluation
1.3. Structure du rapport
2. Les coopérations de la CE et de l’Espagne au Sénégal
2.1. Le contexte du Sénégal
2.2. Politiques et priorités du Gouvernement
2.3. Aide au développement 1996-2008 et principaux PTF
2.4. Stratégie et réalisations de la Coopération de la CE au Sénégal
2.5. Stratégie et réalisations de la Coopération espagnole au Sénégal
3. Réponses aux questions d’évaluation
3.1. Pertinence
3.2. Cohérence
3.3. Développement économique et intégration régionale
3.4. Transports
3.5. Appui macro-économique
3.6. Eau et Assainissement
3.7. Renforcement des Acteurs Non Etatiques
3.8. Casamance
3.9. Efficience
3.10.Les « 3 C »
4. Conclusions
4.1. Pertinence des stratégies-pays
4.2. Appui aux politiques sectorielles
4.3. Aspects opérationnels
4.4. Complémentarités et synergies entre les deux coopérations
5. Recommandations
5.1. Recommandations générales sur les stratégies de coopération
5.2. Recommandation dans le domaine du développement économique
5.3. Recommandations sur l’aide budgétaire
5.4. Recommandations sur le secteur des transports
5.5. Recommandations sur l’eau et l’assainissement
5.6. Recommandation dans le domaine des Acteurs Non Etatiques
5.7. Recommandation dans le domaine du développement régional de la Casamance
| Tome 1
Annexe 1: Matrice par question d’évaluation
QE 1: Pertinence des stratégies de coopération
QE 2: Cohérence interne des stratégies de coopération
QE 3: Développement économique et Intégration régionale
QE 4: Transports
QE 5: Appui macro-économique
QE 6: Eau et Assainissement
QE 7: Acteurs Non Etatiques
QE 8: Casamance
QE 9: Efficience des stratégies de coopération
QE 10 Les « 3c »
Tome 2
Annexe 2: Termes de référence
Annexe 3: Méthodologie d’évaluation
3.1. Phases successives d’évaluation
3.2. Du schéma de la logique d’intervention de la CE et de l’Espagne aux questions d’évaluation et critères de jugement
3.3. Processus de collecte et d’analyse des données et démarche de jugement appliquée
3.3.1. Méthodes de collecte des données
3.3.2. Méthode d’analyse des données
3.3.3. Démarche de jugement
3.4. Limites du processus de collecte et analyse des données et des jugements
3.5. Aperçu global des questions d’évaluation, critères de jugement et indicateurs utilisés et des méthodes employées
Annexe 4: Inventaire des projets et programmes de la coopération de la CE et de la coopération de l’Espagne au Sénégal
Inventaire des projets/programmes de la Commission Européenne au Sénégal
Inventaire des projets/programmes de la Coopération Espagnole au Sénégal
Annexe 5 : Données complémentaires, logique d’intervention
5.1 Logique d’intervention
5.1.1. La logique d’intervention du 8ème FED
5.1.2. La logique d’intervention du 9ème FED
5.1.3. La logique d’intervention du Document Stratégie Pays 2005-2008
| Annexe 6: Fiches Interventions
Appui Budgétaire à la stratégie de réduction de la pauvreté (ABSRP)
Assainissement des centres secondaires – phase I eaux pluviales
...
Annexe 7: Bibliographie consultée
Annexe 8: Liste des personnes rencontrées
Annexe 9: Comptes-rendus des Focus Group
Focus Group Approche territoriale locale en Casamance
Focus Group Acteurs Non Etatiques
Focus Group Eau et Assainissement
Focus Group Transport
Focus Group changements structurels dans l’agriculture et le monde rural au Sénégal
Annexe 10: Diaporama de synthès
Author (Corp. Body): Eco Consult
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen | Espan?a / Ministerio de Asu
Year: 2010
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contrat n° EVA 2007/geo-acp | Ref. 1284
Language: fr
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationdevelopment aidEUEuropean Commissioncooperationmacroeconomicsnon-governmental organizationregional development
SenegalSpaintransportationeconomics of water supply and distributioneconomic development (on national level)
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesSpainSenegal
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Country Level Evaluation Angola : Final Report ; Volume 1: Main Report
Title (other): Country Level Evaluation Angola : Final Report ; Volume 2: Annexes | Fiche Contradictoire : Evaluation of the
Commission’s External Cooperation with Angola (Country level evaluation) | Final Report : Observations and Judgement |
Evaluation of the European Commission’s cooperation with the Republic of Angola : Ref. 1267 ; Summary ; EVINFO
Abstract
This report covers the evaluation of the European Commission (EC) cooperation strategy with Angola and its implementation over the period 2002–2007. The main objectives of this evaluation are: a)to provide the external cooperation Services of the EC and the wider public with an overall independent assessment of the Commission’s past and current cooperation relations with Angola; b)to identify key lessons learned from the past cooperation with Angola in order to improve the current and future strategies and programmes of the Commission.The scope of the evaluation covers the cooperation strategy and its implementation in relation to the National Indicative Programme of EDF9 (including uncommitted balances from previous EDFs), and to contributions from thematic Budget Lines and other cooperation instruments. Humanitarian intervention by ECHO has not been within in the scope of this evaluation but has been considered as the starting point for the Linking Relief, Rehabilitation and Development(LRRD) strategy of the EDF.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Volume 2
ANNEX 1 TERMS OF REFERENCE
ANNEX 2 COMPLEMENTARY DATA ON EC INTERVENTION LOGIC
ANNEX 3 EC PROJECT PORTFOLIO 2002-2007
ANNEX 4 ECHO LRRD PROJECT PORTFOLIO
ANNEX 5 EVALUATION METHODOLOGY
ANNEX 6 MATRIX FOR EVALUATION QUESTIONS
ANNEX 7 CASE STUDIES
ANNEX 8 COUNTRY SOCIO-ECONOMIC DATA
ANNEX 9 OFFICIAL DONOR ASSISTANCE
ANNEX 10 BIBLIOGRAPHY AND DOCUMENTATION
ANNEX 11 LIST OF PEOPLE CONTACTED
ANNEX 12 MISSION CALENDAR
ANNEX 13 FOCUS GROUP REPORTS
ANNEX 14 ADDITIONAL SECTORAL CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
ANNEX 15 MINUTES OF THE SEMINAR IN LUANDA 10 JUNE, 2009
| EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Scope and objectives of the evaluation
1.2 Evaluation methodology implemented
1.2.1 Information collection
1.2.2 Analysis of available information
1.2.3 Formulation of the judgements
1.3 Changes between the Desk Report and the Synthesis Report
1.4 Limitations of analytical process and judgment
1.5 Structure of the report
2 COUNTRY CONTEXT OF EC COOPERATION WITH ANGOLA
2.1 Political context
2.2 Economic context
2.3 Social context
2.4 Government policy
2.5 Donors’ response
2.6 EC support to Angola
2.6.1 Principles
2.6.2 The intervention strategy 2002-2007
2.6.3 The allocations to the implementation of the strategy
2.6.4 Regional Cooperation
2.6.5 Humanitarian intervention2.6.6 Thematic Budget Lines
2.6.7 Other sources
3 ANSWER TO EVALUATION QUESTIONS
3.1 Relevance
3.1.1 Approach to the question and EC intervention
3.1.2 Judgements related to the Evaluation Question
3.1.3 Overall judgment and answer to the Evaluation Question
3.2 Coherence and EC value added
3.2.1...
3.3 DDRR
3.3.1...
3.4 Health
...
3.5 Food security
...
3.6 Water and sanitation
...
3.7 Education
...
3.8 Governance and institutional support
...
3.9 Cross-cutting issues
...
3.10 Impact, sustainability, LRRD
...
4 CONCLUSIONS
4.1 Strategic approach and design
4.2 Coordination and EC value added
4.3 Implementation modalities
4.4 Impact and sustainability
4.5 Overall assessment of factors influencing EC cooperation with Angola
5 RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 Strategic recommendations
5.2 Operational recommendations
5.3 Learning recommendations
Author (Corp. Body): ECO Consult
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen | Arbeitsgemeinschaft Entwick
Year: 2009
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract No. EVA 2007/geo - acp | Ref. 1267
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: Angolaevaluationeducationdevelopment aidEUEuropean Commissionfinancial assistanceguarantee of peace
healthcooperationgroceriessustainable developmentadministrationeconomics of water supply and distribution
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesAngola
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Country Level Evaluation Botswana : Final Report ; Volume 1: Main Report
Title (other): Country Level Evaluation Botswana : Final Report ; Volume 2: Annexes | Fiche contradictoire : Evaluation of the EC
Cooperation with Botswana | Evaluation of the EC support to the Republic of Botswana : Final Report | Evaluation of the
EC Cooperation with Botswana : Ref. 1273 ; EVINFO
Abstract
This report covers the evaluation of the European Commission (EC) cooperation strategy with Botswana and its implementation over the period 1999–2008. The main objectives of this evaluation were:a) to provide the external cooperation Services of the EC and the wider public with an overall independent assessment of the Commission’s past and current cooperation relations with Botswana;b) to identify key lessons learned from the past cooperation with Botswana in order to improve the current and future strategies and programmes of the Commission.The scope of the evaluation covers the cooperation strategy and its implementation in relation to the country strategies and National Indicative Programmes (NIP) of EDF 8, 9, and 10 and to contributions from thematic Budget Lines and other cooperation instruments.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
1 Introduction
1.1 Purpose and Scope of the Evaluation
1.2 Methodology of the Evaluation
1.3 Changes between the Desk Report and the Synthesis Report
1.4 Limits of the Evaluation
1.5 Structure of the Report
2 EC-cooperation and its Context
2.1 Economic, Political and Social Context
2.1.1 Economic Context
2.1.2 Political Context
2.1.3 Public administration and public sector reform
2.1.4 Social Context, Human Development
2.2 Development Assistance to Botswana
2.3 EC-Cooperation with Botswana and overview on the main sectors
2.3.1 Dialogue
2.3.2 Trade for Development
2.3.3 Development Cooperation under EDF8, 9, and 10
3 Answers to the Evaluation Questions
3.1 Evaluation Question 1: Relevance (and Coherence) of the Cooperation Strategy
3.1.1 Judgements and Related Findings
3.1.2 Answer to EQ 1
3.2 Evaluation Question 2: Efficiency of the Implementation
3.2.1 Judgements and Related Findings
3.2.2 Answer to EQ 2
3.3 Evaluation Question 3: Effectiveness and Impact of Programmes in the HRDSector
3.3.1 Judgements and Related Findings
3.3.2 Answer to EQ 3
3.4 Evaluation Question 4: Effectiveness and Impact of Programmes in the Natural Resources Management (NRM) Sector
3.4.1 Judgements and Related Findings
3.4.2 Answer to EQ 4
3.5 Evaluation Question 5: Effectiveness and Impact of Non-focal Programmes, notably Micro-projects, NSA and MLG, as well as of Other EC Instruments
3.5.1 Judgements and Related Findings
3.5.2 Answer to EQ 5
| 3.6 Evaluation Question 6: HIV-AIDS
3.6.1 Judgements and Related Findings
3.6.2 Answer to EQ 6
3.7 Evaluation Question 7: Cross-cutting Issues
3.7.1 Judgements and Related Findings
3.7.2 Answer to EQ 7
3.8 Evaluation Question 8: Sustainability of Achievements
3.8.1 Judgements and Related Findings
3.8.2 Answer to EQ 8
3.9 Evaluation Question 9: Coherence, Coordination, Complementarity, and Value Added
3.9.1 Judgements and Related Findings
3.9.2 Answer to EQ 9
4 Conclusions
4.1 Relevance and Coherence of the support strategy
4.2 Efficiency of the support strategy
4.3 Human Resources Development
4.4 Natural Resources Management (NRM)
4.5 Non-focal Sector Programmes and Other Instruments
4.5.1 Support to MPP, MLG, NSA, CS
4.5.2 Support to the Mining Sector (SYSMIN) and to Economic Diversification
4.5.3 Regional Integration and Trade (including EPA and Beef Exports)
4.6 Cross Cutting Issues
4.7 Sustainability
4.8 Coherence, Coordination, Complementarity, and Value Added
5 Recommendations
5.1 Relevance and Coherence of the support strategy
5.2 Efficiency of the support strategy
5.3 Human Resources Development
5.4 Natural Resources Management (NRM)
5.5 Non-focal Sector Programmes and Other Instruments
5.5.1 Community Development (MLG, NSA, Civil Society support)
5.5.2 Support to the Mining Sector (SYSMIN) and to Economic Diversification
5.5.3 Private Sector Development, Regional Integration and Trade (including EPA and Beef Exports)
5.6 Cross Cutting Issues
5.7 Sustainability
5.8 Outlook EDF11
| Volume 2
Annex 1 Terms of Reference
Annex 2 Intervention Logic of EC-Cooperation with Botswana
Annex 3 Overview of Evaluation Questions
Annex 4 Information Matrix
Annex 5 Inventory of EC-Projects/Programmes in Botswana
Annex 6 Bibliography
1. EC Documents
2. Botswana Governmental Documents
3. Other Documents
4. Sector Specific Documents
Annex 7 List of Persons Met
Annex 8 Methods Used During Field Phase
Annex 9 Basic questionnaire for partner interviews
Annex 10 Questionnaire and answers of other donors
Annex 11 Protocols of the focus groups
Annex 12 Project fiches
Annex 13 Education & Training SPSP – Indicators
Annex 14 PowerPoint Presentation at the Seminar in Gaborone
Author (Corp. Body): ECO Consult
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen | Arbeitsgemeinschaft Entwick
Year: 2009
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract No EVA 2007/geo -acp | Ref. 1273
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: AIDSminingevaluationBotswanadevelopment aidEUEuropean Commissionfinancial assistance
commercecooperationnaturenon-governmental organizationpersonnel developmentprivate sectorregional integrationresourceseconomic development (on national level)
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesBotswana
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation de la coopération de la Commission européenne avec la République centrafricaine : Evaluation de niveau
national ; Rapport final ; Volume 1: Rapport principal
Title (other): Evaluation de la coopération de la Commission européenne avec la République centrafricaine : Evaluation de niveau
national ; Rapport final ; Volume 2: Annexes | Evaluation de la Coopération de la Commission Européenne avec la
République Centrafricaine : Fiche Contradictoire | Grille de qualite : Evaluation de la coopération de la Commission
européenne avec la République Centrafricaine ; Rapport Final – Juin 2009 | Evaluation de la Coopération de la
Commission Européenne avec la République Centrafricaine : Ref. 1263 ; EVINFO | Evaluation de la coopération de la
Commission européenne avec la République centrafricaine : Evaluation de niveau national ; Résumé exécutif |
Evaluation of the Cooperation between the European Commission and the Central African Republic : Country Level
Evaluation ; Executive Summary
Abstract
The period covered by the evaluation, 1996-2007, was a time of political-military crises and worsening poverty and insecurity for the Central African Republic. This continued the trend which started immediately after Independence and which led the Central African Republic into a situation of chronic structural crisis.The management of the revenues from the exploitation of the local natural resources by the country’s leaders only benefited the very few. Over the reporting period the human development indicators worsened, and no sustainable economic growth was generated by the private sector. Hardly any new infrastructures were developed, and those that existed continuously deteriorated.The country remained almost fully dependent on Official Development Assistance (ODA) flows, which have gradually become scarcer with the increase in military conflicts and political crises. Systematic ODA flows were not reinstated until 2005 in the wake of the elections that followed the coup d’état of 2003.For years the European Commission was therefore faced with a large number of challenges, with an obligation to react rapidly and put in place responses both adapted to the country’s needs and consistent with Community rules. Between 1997 and 2007, the Commission mobilised €128m - that is €28 per inhabitant. More than two-thirds (68%) of disbursements were for macroeconomic support (€52.5m) and transport (€35.1m).[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Liste des sigles et abréviations
Appréciation globale
Résumé
Executive Summary
1 Introduction
1.1 Objectifs et champ de l’évaluation
1.2 Contexte de la réponse stratégique
1.3 Finalité de l'évaluation
2 Méthode d’évaluation
2.1 Les critères de jugement et les indicateurs
2.2 La démarche évaluative
2.3 Mise en œuvre de la méthode
3 La stratégie d’aide communautaire et son contexte
3.1 Contexte politique et socio économique
3.2 Stratégie d’aide au développement de la CE
3.3 Activités des autres PTF en RCA
4 Réponses apportées aux questions d’évaluation
4.1 Adaptation des stratégies de la CE aux besoins de la RCA et aux principes communautaires
4.2 Efficacité et impacts des appuis macroéconomiques
4.3 Efficacité et impact des appuis au secteur des transports
4.4 Efficacité et impacts dans le secteur de la santé
4.5 Combinaison efficiente des outils
4.6 Cohérence avec la stratégie régionale de la CE
4.7 Cohérence avec la Facilité de Paix pour l’Afrique
4.8 Cohérence, coordination-complémentarité et valeur ajoutée
4.9 Prise en compte des priorités transversales
4.10 Intégration de l’approche LRRD
5 Conclusions et recommandations
5.1 Conclusions
5.2 Recommandations
| 1.Termes de référence de la mission
2. Matrice d’information
QE1 - Dans quelle mesure les stratégies développées par l’aide de la CE - en particulier en ce qui concerne les objectifs, les secteurs de concentration et les modalités de participation des parties prenantes - ont-elles correspondu (i) aux objectifs et principes communautaires, (ii) aux priorités exprimées par le Gouvernement, (iii) aux besoins et aux capacités humaines et administratives du pays et (iv) aux évènements politiques de la période?
QE2 - Dans quelle mesure les interventions de la Commission en matière d’appui macroéconomique ont-elles contribué à une meilleure gestion des finances publiques, à favoriser la stabilité macroéconomique et la réduction de la pauvreté?
QE 3 - Dans quelle mesure les interventions de la Commission, dans son rôle de chef de file du secteur des transports, ont-elles permis (i) d’effectivement augmenter la mobilité des marchandises et des personnes en facilitant les échanges intérieurs et l’accès aux ports, (ii) de réduire les prix à la consommation dans les principaux centres urbains et (iii) d’améliorer durablement le système financier et technique d’entretien du réseau prioritaire?
QE4 - Dans quelle mesure les interventions de la Commission ont-elles contribué à améliorer l’état de santé de la population par un renforcement de l’accès aux services de santé et l’amélioration de la qualité des soins?
QE5 - Dans quelle mesure la Commission a utilisé une combinaison d’outils (ressources, instruments financiers, procédures et cadre réglementaires) adaptée à l’atteinte des objectifs stratégiques des différentes périodes, et particulièrement des périodes de crises?
QE6 - Dans quelle mesure les stratégies et programmes régionaux ont-ils été programmés, préparés et mis en œuvre en recherchant ou non des effets cumulatifs (synergies), en évitant les contradiction et les doubles emplois avec les stratégies communautaires de niveau national (et réciproquement) pour la lutte contre la pauvreté, | 6.2. Projets et approches sectorielles de la CE
6.2.1. Environnement
6.2.2. Bonne Gouvernance et Questions Transversales
6.3. Divers
7. Liste des projets 8 et 9ème FED en RCA (1996-2006)
8. Liste des personnes rencontrée
| la gestion des conflits et l’exploitation des ressources naturelles?
QE7 - Dans quelle mesure, la combinaison d’outils communautaires et d’autres instruments horizontaux d’intervention comme la Facilité de Paix pour l’Afrique ou la politique extérieure communautaire dans la région ont accompagné la sortie de crise de la RCA?
QE 8 - Dans quelle mesure, dans un contexte difficile, la qualité de la relation établie par la CE avec les autres partenaires techniques et financiers de la RCA a permis d’améliorer la cohérence et la complémentarité des interventions et de dégager une valeur ajoutée communautaire à un niveau global et/ou sectoriel, au sein d’une coordination avec les États membres?
QE9 - Les priorités transversales ont-elles été prises en compte dans la programmation, la préparation et la mise en œuvre des interventions de la Commission?
QE10 - Dans un contexte d’instabilité chronique, l’approche communautaire, notamment relative à l’État de droit et la bonne gouvernance, a t’elle intégré de manière anticipée des dimensions de prévention des conflits et de LRRD dans la programmation et la mise en œuvre de ses programmes?
3. Cartes de la RCA
4. Analyse des principaux documents stratégiques de la CE
4.1. Documents de politique européenne
4.2. Analyse de principaux documents de stratégie pays
4.3. Documents de stratégie de coopération régionale
4.4. Diagramme des effets
5. Annexes à la QE2
5.1. Documents
5.2. Synthèse des écarts budgetaires
5.3. Aspects juridiques de la réforme des finances publiques en RCA
5.3.1. Interventions de la Banque Mondiale
5.3.2. RCA : Tableau Récapitulatif des Indicateurs de Performance PEFA
5.3.3. Processus d’accession au point de décision PPTE
5.3.4. Chronologie finances publiques RCA
5.3.5. Matrice des declencheurs PTE
5.3.6. Matrice simplifiee des appuis macro economiques et reforme des finances publiques en RCA (1996-2008)
6. Liste des documents consultés
6.1. Programmation et stratégie de la CE
Author (Corp. Body): ECO Consult
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen | Arbeitsgemeinschaft Entwick
Year: 2009
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contrat n° EVA 2007/ geo-acp | Ref. 1263
Language: en | fr
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationdevelopment aidEUEuropean Commissionfinancial assistanceguarantee of peacehealth care delivery systeminfrastructure
crisis interventionprivate sectorregional integrationtransportationeconomic growthCentral African Republic
Subject: Aid programmesPeace. Wars. TerrorismEuropean Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesCentral African Republic
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation de la coopération de la Commission européenne avec la République du Tchad : Evaluation de niveau national
; Rapport final ; Volume I: Rapport principal
Title (other): Evaluation de la coopération de la Commission européenne avec la République du Tchad : Evaluation de niveau national
; Rapport Final ; Volume II: Annexes | Evaluation de la Coopération de la Commission Européenne avec le Tchad : Fiche
Contradictoire | Evaluation de la stratégie de la CE au Tchad : Grille de Qualité du Rapport Final | Evaluation de la
Coopération de la Commission Européenne avec la République du Tchad : Ref. 1260 ; EVINFO
Abstract
This report presents the results of the evaluation of the European Commission’s (EC) cooperation strategy with Chad between 1996 and 2007. The objectives of this evaluation are the provision of an independent overall assessment of the Commission’s cooperation with Chad during the above mentioned period and to identify the principal lessons learnt from this cooperation in order to improve the European Commission’s strategy and programmes in Chad. To this end, the evaluation assesses the strategy and its implementation over the period 1996 to 2007, with special attention to aid from the National Indicative Programmes (NIPs) of the 8th and 9th EDF, as well as thematic budget lines. Emergency aid and EIB actions are not covered by the scope of this evaluation.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
RESUME
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1 INTRODUCTION
1.1 CADRE, OBJECTIF ET CHAMP DE L'EVALUATION
1.2 STRUCTURE DU RAPPORT
1.3 METHODOLOGIE DE L'EVALUATION
2 CONTEXTE GLOBAL DE LA COOPERATION CE ? TCHAD
2.1 CONTEXTE POLITIQUE, ECONOMIQUE, SOCIAL ET CULTUREL
2.2 POLITIQUE DU GOUVERNEMENT
2.3 AIDE AU DEVELOPPEMENT 1996?2007 ET PRINCIPAUX BAILLEURS
2.4 STRATEGIE DE COOPERATION AU DEVELOPPEMENT DE LA COMMISSION EUROPEENNE AU TCHAD
2.5 MOYENS D'AIDE DISPONIBLES ET EMPLOYES POUR LA MISE EN OEUVRE DE LA STRATEGIE
3 RESPONSES AUX QUESTIONS EVALUATIVES
3.1 COHERENCE ET PERTINENCE
3.2 TRANSPORT ROUTIER
3.3 EAU & ASSAINISSEMENT
3.4 SANTE PUBLIQUE
3.5 APPUI MACROECONOMIQUE
3.6 BONNE GOUVERNANCE
3.7 INTEGRATION ECONOMIQUE REGIONALE
3.8 EFFICIENCE
3.9 THEMES TRANSVERSAUX
3.10 COHERENCE, COMPLEMENTARITE ET COORDINATION
4 CONCLUSIONS
4.1 THEME 1: STRATEGIE PAYS
4.2 THEME 2: APPUI AUX POLITIQUES SECTORIELLES
4.3 THEME 3: ASPECTS OPERATIONNELS
5 RECOMMANDATIONS
5.1 THEME 1: STRATEGIE PAYS
5.2 THEME 2: APPUI AUX POLITIQUES SECTORIELLES
5.3 THEME 3: ASPECTS OPERATIONNELS
5.4 LES TROIS RECOMMANDATIONS LES PLUS IMPORTANTES
| Volume 2
ANNEXE 1: TERMES DE RÉFÉRENCE
ANNEXE 2: DONNÉES COMPLÉMENTAIRES, LOGIQUE D’INTERVENTION ET STRATÉGIE DE LA CE
ANNEXE 2.1: DOCUMENTS DE POLITIQUE EUROPÉENNE POUR LA COOPÉRATION AU DÉVELOPPEMENT
ANNEXE 2.2: LOGIQUE D’INTERVENTION DE LA CE AU TCHAD
ANNEXE 2.3: DONNÉES QUANTITATIVES COMPLÉMENTAIRE SUR LA COOPÉRATION CE–TCHAD
ANNEXE 2.4: STRATÉGIE MISE EN ŒUVRE PAR MACRO-SECTEUR/THÈME DU DSP
ANNEXE 3: INVENTAIRE DES PROJETS ET PROGRAMMES AU TCHAD
ANNEXE 4: MÉTHODOLOGIE DE L’ÉVALUATION
ANNEXE 4.1: PHASES SUCCESSIVES D’ÉVALUATION
ANNEXE 4.2: DU SCHÉMA DE LA LOGIQUE DE L’INTERVENTION DE LA CE AUX QUESTIONS D’EVALUATION ET CRITÈRES DE JUGEMENT
ANNEXE 4.3: PROCESSUS DE COLLECTE ET D'ANALYSE DES DONNÉES ET DÉMARCHE DE JUGEMENT APPLIQUÉE
ANNEXE 4.4: LIMITES DU PROCESSUS DE COLLECTE ET ANALYSE DES DONNÉES ET DES JUGEMENTS
ANNEXE 4.5: APERÇU GLOBAL DES QUESTIONS ÉVALUATIVES, CRITÈRES DE JUGEMENT ET INDICATEURS UTILISÉS ET DES MÉTHODES EMPLOYÉES
ANNEXE 5: MATRICE D’EVALUATION : DÉTAILS DES RÉPONSES AUX QUESTIONS D’ÉVALUATION
ANNEXE 6: FICHES D’ÉVALUATION DE PROGRAMMES/PROJETS
ANNEXE 7: DONNÉES ÉCONOMIQUES ET SOCIALES DU PAYS
ANNEXE 7.1: SITUATION POLITIQUE, ÉCONOMIQUE ET SOCIALE DU PAYS
ANNEXE 7.2: DONNÉES STATISTIQUES DU PAYS
ANNEXE 8: BAILLEURS ET APD AU TCHAD
ANNEXE 9: BIBLIOGRAPHIE
ANNEXE 10: LISTE DES PERSONNES RENCONTRÉES
ANNEXE 11: CALENDRIER DE LA MISSION DE TERRAIN
| ANNEXE 12: PROJETS/PROGRAMMES DONT LA DÉCISION A ÉTÉ PRISE EN 2007 MAIS N’AYANT PAS DÉMARRÉ AVANT 2008 (EXTRAITS FICHES D’IDENTIFICATION)
ANNEXE 12.1 UTILISATION DE L’ENVELOPPE B9EFED : PROGRAMME LRRD(9ACPCD21)
ANNEXE 12.2 PROGRAMME D’ACCOPMAGNEMENT À LA STABILISATION DE L’EST DU TCHAD (PAS LRRD)(EXTRAIT)
ANNEXE 12.3 INSTRUMENT DE STABILITÉ DE LA CE.CFUE-UNFPARECENSEMENT GÉNERAL DE LA POPULATION ET DE L’HABITAT (EXTRAITS)
ANNEXE 12.4 LB SÉCURITÉ ALIMENTAIRE: SYSTÈME D’ALERTE PRÉCOCE
ANNEXE 13: COMPTES RENDUS DE « FOCUS GROUPS »
ANNEXE 14: DOCUMENTS DE L’ATELIER DE RESTITUTION DES RÉSULTATS DE L’ÉVALUATION À N’DJAMÉNA DU 11 DÉCEMBRE 2008
ANNEXE 14.1 LISTE DES PARTICIPANTS
ANNEXE 14.2 PRÉSENTATION DE JEAN-LOUIS BOLLY,COMMISSION EUROPÉENNE (VOIR CD-ROMACCOMPAGNANT LE RAPORT PRINCIPAL)
ANNEXE 14.3 PRÉSENTATION DE CATHERINE BOUVEYRON, CHEF DE LA MISSION D’ÉVALUATION (VOIR CD-ROM ACCOMPAGNANT LE RAPORT PRINCIPAL)
Author (Corp. Body): ECO Consult
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen | Arbeitsgemeinschaft Entwick
Year: 2009
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contrat n° EVA 2007/geo-acp | Ref. 1260
Language: fr
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationdevelopment aidEUEuropean Commissionfinancial assistancecooperationmacroeconomicsregional integration
road trafficChadadministrationeconomics of water supply and distribution
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesChad
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of the European Commission's Co-operation with Namibia : Country Level evaluation ; Final Report ; Volume 1:
Main Report
Title (other): Evaluation of the European Commission's Co-operation with Namibia : Country Level evaluation ; Final Report ; Volume 2:
Annex | Fiche Contradictoire : Evaluation of the European Commission’s cooperation with Namibia | Evaluation of the
EC's cooperation with Namibia : Final Report | Evaluation of the European Commission's Co-operation with Namibia : Ref.
1272 ; EVINFO
Abstract
This report presents the findings of the 2008 Country Level Evaluation of EC support to the Republic of Namibia. The evaluation was carried out to provide meaningful feedback to the European Commission but also to the general public on the results achieved by the Commission’s cooperation with Namibia between 2001 and 2007 since the previous Country Level Evaluation in 2001. This means that this evaluation covered the Country Strategy Papers for the 9th EDF, but also taking into consideration activities that had been financed with resources from 8th EDF and intended effects of the 10th EDF. It covered the different sectors that the European Commission supported and all financing modalities used in this period, including education, rural development, regional integration and trade, HIV and AIDS and organisational capacity development. Lessons from this evaluation are meant to be used to inform the current and future strategies of the EC in cooperating with Namibia.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
1 Introduction
1.1 Purpose and Objectives of the Evaluation
1.2 Scope of the Evaluation
1.3 Methodology of Evaluation
1.3.1 Evaluation Questions, Judgement criteria and Indicators
1.3.2 Methodological Note – Evaluation of Budget Support (Education)
1.3.3 Data Collection Process
1.3.4 Selection of and Implementation of Case Studies
1.3.5 Approach for Data Analysis and for Ensuring Data Reliability and Validity of Conclusions
1.4 Limitations of the Evaluation
1.5 Objectives and Structure of the Present Report
2 EC Cooperation with Namibia and its Context
2.1 Strategic Context of the Cooperation
2.1.1 Broad Characteristics of Namibia
2.1.2 EC Concern with Poverty Eradication in the Namibian Socio-economic Context
2.1.3 Good Governance and Human Rights as Central EC Concerns and their Relevance in Namibia
2.1.4 The EC, Namibia and the Drive towards Increased Aid Effectiveness
2.1.5 Regional Integration as a Key Characteristic of Namibia’s Place in the Region
2.2 EC Cooperation with Namibia
2.2.1 General Framework and Principles of EC Co-operation
2.2.2 EC Assistance to Namibia 2001-2007
2.2.3 EC Intervention Logic in Namibia
3 Answers to Evaluation Questions
3.1 Relevance with needs / Coherence with GRN objectives
3.1.1 Rationale of the Evaluation Question
3.1.2 Answer to the Evaluation Question
3.2 Coherence, the “3Cs” and Value Added
3.2.1 Rationale for the Evaluation Question
3.2.2 Answer to the Evaluation Question
3.3 Rural Development
3.3.1 Rationale for the Evaluation Question
3.3.2 Answer to the Evaluation Question
3.4 Land Reform
3.4.1 Rationale for the Evaluation Question
3.4.2 Answer to the Evaluation Question
3.5 Human Resource Development / Education
3.5.1 Rationale for the Evaluation Question
3.5.2 Answer to the Evaluation Question
3.6 Trade and Regional Integration
3.6.1 Rationale for the Evaluation Question
3.6.2 Answer to the Evaluation Question
| 3.7 Capacity Development
3.7.1 Rationale for Evaluation Question
3.7.2 Answer to Evaluation Question
3.8 HIV and AIDS
3.8.1 Rationale for the Evaluation Question
3.8.2 Answer to the Evaluation Question
3.9 SWAp and Sector Budget Support
3.9.1 Rationale for the Evaluation Question
3.9.2 Answer to the Evaluation Question
3.10 Global Impact and Sustainability
3.10.1 Rationale for the Evaluation Question
3.10.2 Answer to the Evaluation Question
4 Conclusions
4.1 Design of EC Strategies and Coverage of Sectors
4.2 Use of Aid and Financing Modalities
4.2.1 Use of Sector Budget Support in Education
4.2.2 Policy Dialogue
4.2.3 Other Aid Modalities
4.3 Experiences with Supporting Capacity Development
4.4 Achievement of Sustainable Results (Effectiveness, Impact and Sustainability)
5 Recommendations
5.1 Overall EC Strategy and Coverage of Sectors
5.2 Use of Aid and Financing Modalities across Sectors
5.2.1 Use of Sector Budget Support
5.2.2 Re-orientation of Policy Dialogue
5.2.3 Use of other Aid Modalities
5.3 Capacity Development
| ANNEX A: Detailed background information
A.1 Institutional Context for EU foreign relations with Namibia
A.2 Institutional context of EC support in Rural Development in Namibia
A.3 Institutional context of EC support to Land Reform
A.4 Institutional context of EC support to Education
A.5 Institutional context of EC support to Regional Integration and Trade
A.6 Institutional context of EC support to capacity development
A.7 Institutional context for EC support to HIV and AIDS
A.8 Institutional context for Sector Support
ANNEX B: General view of EC co-operation in Namibia
B.1 EC development assistance for Namibia in figures
B.2 Intervention logic of EC assistance to Namibia
B.2.1 Overall Intervention Logic
B.2.2 EC intervention logic with regard to support to Rural Development
B.2.3. EC portfolio with regard to Land Reform in Namibia
B.2.4. EC portfolio and intervention logic in HRD / Education
B.2.5 EC Intervention Logic with regards to RIT
B.2.6. EC intervention logic with regard to capacity development
B.2.7. EC intervention logic with regard to HIV and AIDS
B.2.8 EC Intervention Principles
B.3 Support of other donors to Namibia
B.3.1 Aid from the member states
B.3.2 Other bilateral donors
B.3.3 The Bretton Woods’ institutions
B.3.4. The United Nations’ System
ANNEX C: Evaluation Matrix
C.1 Relevance with regard to population needs / Coherence with GRN Objectives
C.2 Coherence, The “three Cs” and Value Added
C.3 Rural Development
C.4 Land Reform
C.5 Human Resource Development / Education
C.6 Trade and Regional Integration
C.7 Capacity Development
C.8 HIV and AIDS
C.9 SWAp and Budget Support as Aid Modalities in Namibia
C.10 Global Impact and Sustainability of EC support
C.11 Bibliography
C.12 EC Portfolio Per Evaluation Questions
C.13 Financial Data on SBS in Roads, Water and Education
ANNEX D: Supporting Documentation to Methodology
D.1 Methodological approach
D.2 Evaluation Process
| D.3 Data Collection
D.4 Data Collection Per Evaluation Question
D.5 Case Study Methodologies
D.6 Case Study Fiches
D.7 Interviews held during Desk and Field Phase
D.8 Examples/selection of Documentation of Data Collection during Field Mission
ANNEX E: Inventory of EC Interventions in Namibia between 2001 and 2007
ANNEX F: General documentation collected and reviewed
9 ANNEX G: ETSIP Framework
ANNEX H: Minutes of Dissemination Seminar in Windhoek (1st of July 2009)
ANNEX I: Terms of reference
ANNEX K: POwerPoint Presentation of Seminar in Winhoek
Author (Corp. Body): ECO Consult
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen | Arbeitsgemeinschaft Entwick
Year: 2009
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract No EVA 2007/geo-acp | Ref. 1272
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: AIDSevaluationeducationdevelopment aidEUEuropean Commissioncommercecooperation
rural developmentNamibiaorganizational developmentregional integration
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesNamibia
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
« Previous
Next »
Copyright (C) 2003-2019 European Documentation Centres / Update: 09.10.2019