Suche nach Schlagworten '00001337'

263 entries found on 14 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 20

Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
« Previous
Next »
Title: Participatory integrated assessment methods
Title (other): An assessment of their usefulness to the European Environmental Agency
Abstract
This report gives a critical appraisal of participatory methods of Integrated Environmental Assessment (IEA) and evaluates the applicability of these methods to the EEA's work on IEAs. The report is a background document on using participatory integrated assessments in the context of preparations for the EEA's next report on the state of and outlook for the pan-European environment, scheduled for publication in 2004/2005.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
.........59
Author: Vos, Hans
Series Title: Europäische Umweltagentur - Technical report ; 64
Contributer: Europäische Umweltagentur
Year: 2001
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: assessmentevaluationEUenvironmental research
Subject: European Communities. European UnionProtection of the environment
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Umweltagentur (http://www.eea.eu.int/)
Title: Evaluation of the functioning of the European judical network in civil and commercial matters
Title (other): Final report
Table of Contents
List of Tables
List of Figures
List of Abbreviations
1. SUMMARY
1.1. Summary of conclusions
1.2. Summary of Recommendations
2. INTRODUCTION
2.1. Description of the Network instrument
2.2. Purpose and scope of the evaluation
3. RESEARCH METHODOLOGY
3.1. Research design
3.1.1. Construction of the intervention logic
3.1.2. Methods of data collection and analysis
3.2. Analysis of collected data
4. EVALUATION RESULTS
4.1. Functioning of the Network
4.1.1. Internal coherence of objectives
4.1.2. Current set-up of the Network
4.1.3. The website
4.1.4. Contact points and organisation at national level
4.1.5. The meetings of contact points and Network members
4.1.6. CIRCA
4.1.7. Requests for judicial co-operation and their registration
4.1.8. Analysis on functioning of the Network
4.1.9. Conclusions on Network functioning
4.2. Interaction of the Network members and components
4.2.1. Coordination amongst national contact points and / or national networks
4.2.2. Role of Network members as intermediary vis- à -vis to ultimate users
4.2.3. Interaction with experts who monitor legislative work in civil law
4.2.4. Analysis on interaction of the Network members and components
4.2.5. Conclusions on interaction of the Network members and components
4.3. Results and impacts of the Network
4.3.1. Facilitation of relations between courts
4.3.2. Impacts of the Network related to judicial cooperation
4.3.3. Impacts of the Network related to the principle of mutual recognition
4.3.4. Impacts of the Network related to preparedness for entry into force of new instruments
4.3.5. Analysis on results and impacts of the Network
4.3.6. Conclusions on results and impacts of the Network
4.4. Coherence of external instruments
4.4.1. Analysis on coherence of external instruments
4.4.2. Conclusions on coherence of external instruments
4.5. Access to justice of legal professions and the
Author (Corp. Body): The European Evaluation Consortium TEEC
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Inneres
Year: 2005
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: JAI /C1/OT ge (2004)3065 | BUDG-02-01-L2
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationEuropeCommercial Lawnetworklawcivil law
Subject: European Community law in generalCivil law in generalCommercial law. Company law
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu.int/)
Title: Global Evaluation of the European Neighbourhood Partnership Instrument
Abstract
The study finds that ENP policy documents and ENPI budgetary allocations are fairly well aligned with the strategic objectives of EU external policy, and that planned interventions are well aligned with partner countries' needs and development priorities. Regarding performance, although ENPI allows for a more flexible and efficient use of resources compared to its predecessors (MEDA and TACIS), it still too early to assess whether these structural improvements has brought about improved results.[European Parliament]
Series Title:European Parliament - Study
Author (Corp. Body): Economisti Associati srl Via Rialto Bologna Italy
Publisher: Europäische Union / Europäisches Parlament
Year: 2008
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationbudgetcross border cooperationpartnership
Subject: International cooperationInternational relationsMoney. Financing
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäisches Parlament (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of EC support to partner countries in the area of energy : Final report
Title (other): Evaluation of EC support to partner countries in the area of energy : Final report ; Annexes | Evaluation of EC support
to partner countries in the area of energy : Executive Summary | Fiche contradictoire : Evaluation of the EC support to
Partner Countries in the area of Energy ; 3d column | Quality Grid : Evaluation of EC support to Partner Countries in
the area of Energy ; Final Report | Thematic evaluation of EC support to Partner Countries in the area of energy : Ref.
1192 ; EVINFO
Abstract
This evaluation assesses the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability of the European Commission’s support to its partner countries in the energy sector. It covers interventions designed or implemented during the 1996-2007 period in all the external cooperation partner countries. This scope of the evaluation is extremely broad and heterogeneous for three major reasons.First, the European Commission’s communications analysis shows that the Commission’s interventions in the energy sector have aimed to contribute to three very different goals: - Improving access to energy in developing countries as a means of reducing poverty; - Securing energy supplies to the EU; - Improving nuclear safety in the Former Soviet Union (FSU).The first goal is increasingly perceived as an important dimension of the fight against poverty; the two others address vital stakes for European citizens. Ranking these different goals by order of importance has no real meaning. The order in which they are presented in the report has no specific significance and has deliberately been varied...[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. THE EVALUATION
1.1 MANDATE AND SCOPE
1.2 APPROACH
1.3 LIMITS OF THE EVALUATION
2. THE COMMISSION SUPPORT FOR ENERGY
2.1 THE EC STRATEGY
2.2 THE COMMISSION’S INTERVENTION PORTFOLIO IN ENERGY
3. ANSWERS TO EVALUATION QUESTIONS
3.1 RELEVANCE AND INTERNAL CONSISTENCY
3.2 EFFECTIVENESS & SUSTAINABILITY
3.3 IMPACT
3.4 EFFICIENCY
3.5 CO-ORDINATION & COMPLEMENTARITY
3.6 COHERENCE
4. CONCLUSIONS
4.1 OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF THE EC STRATEGY: A CO-OPERATION CYCLE NOT YET FORMALISED, WITH IMPORTANT CONSEQUENCES
4.2. CONCLUSIONS ALONG THE 10 STAGE OF THE CO-OPERATION CYCLE
4.3 EFFECTIVENESS AND SUSTAINABILITY: POSITIVE CONTRIBUTION TO IMPROVED SAFETY OF SEVERALL NPPS, LIMITED EFFECTS ON EU SECURITY OF SUPPLY AND ON POVERTY REDUCTION
4.4 COMMUNITY VALUE ADDED
5. RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 THE SPECIFICS OF THE ENERGY SECTOR
5.2 TWO MAJOR AREAS OF PROGRESS
5.3 ADAPTING THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION’S APPROACH
5.4 IMPROVING KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT TO ENHANCE THE COMMISSION’S LEADERSHIP
5.5 SETTING UP A KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
5.6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SUMMARISED
ANNEXES
ANNEX 1– TERMS OF REFERENCE
ANNEX 2– INTERVENTION LOGICS
ANNEX 3– STRUCTURE OF EVALUATION QUESTIONS, JUDGMENT CRITERIA AND INDICATORS
ANNEX 4– CASE STUDIES:SELECTION PROCESS AND FIGURES
ANNEX 5– THE COMMISSION’S INTERVENTIONS IN THE ENERGY SECTOR –FIGURES
ANNEX 6– THE ENERGY SECTOR: ISSUES AT STAKE AND MAIN ACTORS
ANNEX 7– THE GREEN PAPERS & THE THREE DIMENSIONS OF THE EC ENERGY DIALOGUE
ANNEX 8– FIELD VISIT NOTES
ANNEX 9– LIST OF INTERVIEWS
ANNEX 10– BIBLIOGRAPHY
Author (Corp. Body): Aide a? la De?cision Economique
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen | Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid
Year: 2008
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EU countriesEnergyDevelopment Aidpovertyevaluationenergy policyenergy supplydevelopment aid
EUEuropean Commissionnuclear power plantcooperationsecurity
Subject: Economic aid and technical assistanceEuropean Community external relationsEnergy policy. Power generation
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of Commission's external cooperation with partner countries through the organisations of the UN family :
final report ; Volume 1
Title (other): Evaluation of Commission’s external cooperation with partner countries through the organisations of the UN family :
Final Report ; Volume IIa – Annexes 1 to 9 | Evaluation of Commission’s external cooperation with partner countries
through the organisations of the UN family : Final Report ; Volume IIb – Annexes 10 to 12 on Evaluation Methodology |
Evaluation of Commission’s external cooperation with partner countries through the organisations of the UN family :
Inventory Note (final) | Fiche contradictoire : Evaluation of the Commission’s External Cooperation with partner
countries through the organisations of the UN family | Evaluation of Commission's external cooperation with partner
countries through the organisations of the UN family | Evaluation of Commission's External Cooperation with partner
countries through the organisations of the UN family : Ref. 1252 ; EVINFO
Abstract
This evaluation commissioned by the European Commission aims at providing an overall independent assessment of its external cooperation with partner countries through the organisations of the UN family. It covers the partnership between the Commission and the UN to the extent of the Commission’s funding of UN interventions. It focuses on development cooperation funds managed by DG RELEX, DEV and AIDCO. The period covered is 1999-2006.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. EVALUATION OBJECTIVES, ORGANISATION AND METHODOLOGY
1.1 EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE
1.2 EVLUATION METHODOLOGY
2. EVALUATION CONTEXT
2.1 HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF THE COMMISSION-UN PARTNERSHIP
2.2 THE EVOLUTION OF THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK
2.3 INVENTORY OF FUNDS CHANNELLED
3. ANSWERS TO EVALUATION QUESTIONS
3.1 EVALUATION QUESTION 1 ON GUIDING CRITERIA
3.2 EVALUATION QUESTION 2 ON SPECIFIC EXPERTISE
3.3 EVALUATION QUESTION 3 ON RESULTS AND IMPACT
3.4 EVALUATION QUESTION 4 ON STRENGTHENING THE UN SYSTEM
3.5 EVALUATION QUESTION 5 ON SCALING UP
3.6 EVALUATION QUESTION 6 ON VISIBILITY
3.7 EVALUATION QUESTION 7 ON IMPLEMENTATION &COST REDUCTION
3.8 EVALUATION QUESTION 8 ON LEGAL FRAMEWORK
3.9 EVALUATION QUESTION 9 ON COORDINATION AND COMPLEMENTARITY
4. CONCLUSIONS
4.1 OVERALL ASSESSMENT
4.2 GENERAL CHANNELLING FRAMEWORK
4.3 ADDED VALUE OF CHANNELLING FOR THE COMMISSION, FOR THE UN, FOR PARTNER COUNTRIES,AND AS CONVEYED BY THE COMMISSION
4.4 RESULTS & IMPACT
4.5 EFFICIENCY OF THE AID DELIVERY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK
4.6 VISIBILITY
4.7 ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE
5. RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 GENERAL CHANNELLING FRAMEWORK
5.2 EFFICIENCY OF AID DELIVERY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK
5.3 VISIBILITY
5.4 ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE
| Volume IIa Annexes 1 to 9
ANNEX 1- TERMS OF REFERENCE
ANNEX 2- THE EVALUATION QUESTIONS, JUDGEMENT CRITERIA, INDICATORS AND SOURCES OF INFORMATION
ANNEX 3– LIST OF THE SELECTED INTERVENTIONS
ANNEX 4– DESCRIPTION FICHES OF THE SELECTED INTERVENTIONS
ANNEX 5 – DATA COLLECTION GRIDS FOR EACH OF THE SELECTED INTERVENTIONS
ANNEX 6– FIELD MISSIONS DEBRIEFING PRESENTATIONS
ANNEX 7– SYNOPSIS OF ROM ANALYSIS
ANNEX 8– LIST OF PERSONS MET
ANNEX 9– BIBLIOGRAPHY
Volume IIb Annexes 10 to 12 on Evaluation Methodology
ANNEX 10–EVALUATION METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH
ANNEX 11–EVALUATION TOOLS AND CHECKLIST
ANNEX 12–PYRAMIDAL FOCUS GROUPS AND WORKING GROUPS
Author (Corp. Body): Aide a? la De?cision Economique
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid
Year: 2008
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EU countriesInternational cooperationevaluationdevelopment aidEUEuropean Commissionfinancial assistanceinternational cooperation
cooperationUNO
Subject: International cooperationEuropean Community funds and other financial instruments
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of the European Commission's support to the Republic of Guyana : final report ; Volume I – Main Report
Title (other): Evaluation of the European Commission's support to the Republic of Guyana : final report ; Volume II – Annexes | Fiche
contradictoire : Evaluation of the European Commission's support to the Republic of Guyana | Evaluation of the EC
support to the Republic of Guyana : Final Report | Evaluation of the European Commission’s support to the republic of
Guyana : Ref. 1254 ; EVINFO
Abstract
This report presents the results of the evaluation of the European Commission‘s support to the Republic of Guyana during the period 1997-2007. This country evaluation aims to provide an overall independent assessment of the Commission’s past and current cooperation relations with the Republic of Guyana, and to identify key lessons that would help improve the current and future strategies and programmes of the Commission.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. INTRODUCTION
OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION METHODOLOGY
2. STRATEGIC COOPERATION CONTEXT
2.1 THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION’S DEVELOPMENT POLICY
2.1.1 The European Commission’s global development policy
2.1.2 The European Commission’s development policy with ACP countries
2.2 GUYANA’S CONTEXT
2.2.1 The political context
2.2.2 The economic context
2.2.3 The social context
2.2.4 The environmental context
2.3 GUYANA’S DEVELOPMENT POLICY
2.3.1 Guyana’s National Development Strategy 2001-2010
2.3.2 Guyana’s Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP)
2.3.3 The National Competitiveness Strategy for Guyana
2.3.4 The Guyana Action Plan for the sugar sector
2.4 INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN GUYANA
3. THE COMMISSION’S COOPERATION STRATEGY
3.1 THE INTERVENTION LOGIC
3.2 THE COMMISSION’S COOPERATION STRATEGY AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION FOR GUYANA OVER THE PERIOD 1997-2007
3.2.1 The programmable instruments
3.2.2 The non programmable instruments
3.3.3 Overview of the Commission’s cooperation strategy and its implementation over the period 1997-2007
4. EVALUATION QUESTIONS
4.1 COVERAGE OF EVALUATION QUESTIONS
4.2 ANSWERS TO EVALUATION QUESTIONS
4.2.1 EQ 1 : Relevance of the Strategy
4.2.2 EQ2 : Protection of coastal belt population
4.2.3 EQ 3: Production capacity
4.2.4 EQ 4 : Social conditions
4.2.5 EQ 5 : Social benefits to local communities
4.2.6 EQ 6 : Efficiency of implementation
| 4.2.7 EQ 7: Cross-Cutting Issues
4.2.8 EQ 8: Coordination, Complementarity and Coherence with other donors
5. OVERALL ASSESSMENT
5.1 COMMISSION STRATEGY
5.2 IMPLEMENTATION MODALITIES: FOCUS ON BUDGET SUPPORT
5.3 MAJOR CONSTRAINTS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAMME: CAPACITY BUILDING AND BRAIN DRAIN
6. CONCLUSIONS
6.1 COMMISSION STRATEGY
6.2 IMPACTS OF THE INTERVENTIONS
6.3. IMPLEMENTATION MODALITIES
7. RECOMMENDATIONS
7.1 TO REINFORCE THE COHERENCE, IMPACT AND SUSTAINABILITY OF THE COMMISSION’S STRATEGY IN LINE WITH THE GOG’S DEVELOPMENT POLICY AND OTHER DONOR INTERVENTIONS
7.2 TO FOSTER EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF COMMISSION INTERVENTIONS
Volume II
ANNEX 1 – TERMS OF REFERENCE
ANNEX 2 – INFORMANTS MET BEFORE THE FIELD MISSION
ANNEX 3 – FIELD MISSION PLANNING & INFORMANTS MET
ANNEX 4 –BASIC ECONOMIC INDICATORS
ANNEX 5 – INTERNATIONAL DONOR COOPERATION
ANNEX 6 – PRESENTATION OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONS
ANNEX 7 – INFORMATION MATRIX
ANNEX 8 - LIST OF INTERVENTIONS
ANNEX 9 – BIBLIOGRAPHY
Author (Corp. Body): EGEVAL
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen
Year: 2008
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Ref. Ares(2010)230470 | Ref. 1254
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: Development AidGuyanaevaluationdevelopment aid policyEUEuropean Commissionskilled workerfinancial assistance
Guianacooperation
Subject: Economic aid and technical assistanceEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIBEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesGuyana
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of Commission's aid delivery through Development Banks and EIB : Final report ; Volume I
Title (other): Evaluation of Commission's aid delivery through Development Banks and EIB : Final Report ; Volume IIa – Annexes 1 to 10
| Evaluation of Commission's aid delivery through Development Banks and EIB : Final report ; Volume IIb – Annexes 11
and 12 on Evaluation Methodology | Evaluation of Commission's aid delivery through Development Banks and EIB : Inventory
Note (final) | Evaluation of EC aid delivery through development banks and EIB | Evaluation of EC's aid delivery through
development banks and EIB : Ref. 1255 ; EVINFO | Fiche Contradictoire : Evaluation of the EC aid delivery through
development banks and EIB
Abstract
This evaluation commissioned by the European Commission aims at providing an overall independent assessment of its aid delivery through Development Banks and the EIB during the period 1999-2006. It concerns financial flows or “channelling” from the Commission to the aforementioned institutions and covers all geographical areas where such aid delivery took place, except for OECD countries and countries within the mandate of Directorate General Enlargement. It focuses on the funding provided by the Commission’s Directorate General for External Relations (DG RELEX), Directorate General for Development (DG DEV), and EuropeAid Co-operation Office (AIDCO) to the World Bank (WB) and the European Investment Bank (EIB).[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS OF KEY TERMS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. EVALUATION OBJECTIVES, SCOPE AND CONTEXT
1.1 EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE
1.2 OVERALL FRAMEWORK OF THE COOPERATION
1.3 INVENTORY OF FUNDS CHANNELLED
2. EVALUATION METHODOLOGY
2.1 EVALUATION PROCESS AND STRUCTURE
2.2 EVALUATION APPROACH AND INFORMATION SOURCES
2.2.1 A structured approach
2.2.2 Detailed description of the different building stones of the evaluation
2.3 CHALLENGES AND LIMITS
3. ANSWERS TO EVALUATION QUESTIONS
3.1 EVALUATION QUESTION 1 ON THE RATIONALE BEHIND THE CHANNELLING
3.1.1 Decision-making process and guidance
3.1.2 The rationale behind the channelling
3.1.3 Reasons for the observed evolution in channelled aid
3.2 EVALUATION QUESTION 2 ON SCALING UP OF AID
3.2.1 Evolution of ODA and the link with channelling
3.2.2 Facilitation of disbursement by the Commission and to the beneficiaries
3.2.3 Leverage effects of the Commission’s financial contributions and presence
3.3 EVALUATION QUESTION 3 ON RESULTS/IMPACT
3.3.1 Coherence of objectives
3.3.2 Sustainable achievement of results
3.3.3 Availability of information
3.4 EVALUATION QUESTION 4 ON EXPERTISE
3.5 EVALUATION QUESTION 5 ON COST REDUCTION & IMPLEMENTATION
3.5.1 Delays and disbursement
3.5.2 Transaction costs
3.5.3 Procedures: FA and AA
3.6 EVALUATION QUESTION 6 ON VISIBILITY AND INFLUENCE
3.6.1 Evolution of and compliance with the visibility requirements
3.6.2 Effects of visibility actions on stakeholders’ awareness
3.6.3 The Commission’s involvement through its channelling
| 3.7 EVALUATION QUESTION 7 ON COORDINATION &COMPLEMENTARITY
3.7.1 Consultation with EU MS
3.7.2 Coordination of policy dialogue
3.7.3 Coverage of beneficiaries’ needs
4. OVERALL ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSIONS
4.1 OVERALL ASSESSMENT
4.2 RATIONALE AND EVOLUTION OF AID DELIVERY THROUGH THE WB AND THE EIB
Conclusion 1: Increase in funding as intended
Conclusion 2: Strategic approach
Conclusion 3: Different use of WB and EIB
Conclusion 4: Coordination with EU MS
4.3 ADDED VALUE OF AID DELIVERY THROUGH THE WB AND THE EIB
Conclusion 5: Added value of the channelling through the WB and EIB
4.4 EFFECTIVENESS OF AID DELIVERY THROUGH THE WB AND THE EIB
Conclusion 6: Promotion of EU policies
Conclusion 7: Attainment of results
4.5 IMPLEMENTATION AND FOLLOW-UP OF AID ELIVERY THROUGH THE WB AND THE EIB
Conclusion 8: Commission’s organisational set-up
Conclusion 9: Framework Agreement
Conclusion 10: Delays and cost reduction
Conclusion 11: Single-donor WB TFs
Conclusion 12: Interaction Commission - WB
4.6 VISIBILITY
Conclusion 13: Visibility and awareness
4.7 CHANNELLING THROUGH THE EIB-WB-UN
5. RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 STRATEGY AND FRAMEWORK
5.2 ORGANISATIONAL SET-UP AND INTERACTION
5.3 MANAGEMENT TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS
5.4 VISIBILITY
| Volume IIa
Annex 1 – Terms of Reference, Launch Note and approach for an extended desk phase
Annex 2 – Evaluation Questions, Judgement Criteria, Indicators and sources of Information
Annex 3 – Description Fiches for the selection of interventions Annex 4 – Data Collection Grid for the selection of interventions
Annex 5 – Study of the EC contribution to the HIPC Initiative
Annex 6 – Survey questionnaire
Annex 7 – Survey results
Annex 8 – Country missions’ debriefing presentations
Annex 9 – List of persons met
Annex 10 – Bibliography
Author (Corp. Body): Aide à la Décision Economique
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid
Year: 2008
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Ref. 1255
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EU countriesDevelopment bankDevelopment Aidevaluationdevelopment aidEUEuropean Investment BankEuropean Commission
financial assistanceWorld Bank
Subject: Economic aid and technical assistanceAid institutionsEuropean Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu/)
Title: Study on the feasibility of an ECVET system for apprentices (test phase)
Title (other): Durchführbarkeitsstudie zum ECVET-System für Auszubildende (Testphase) | Etude sur la faisabilité d’un système
ECVET pour les apprentis (phase test)
Author (Corp. Body): European Commission / Directorate General for Education and Culture
Year: 2007
Language: en | de | fr
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: vocational educationevaluationEuropelife-long learningapprenticeship
Subject: Vocational education and training
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://www.ec.europa.eu/)
Title: ECVET reflector - Study on the implementation and development of an ECVET system for initial vocational education -
Final report and training
Title (other): ECVET reflector - Studie zur Implementierung und Entwicklung eines Leistungspunkte-Systems für die berufliche
Erstausbildung - Schlussbericht | ECVET reflector - Étude sur la mise en oeuvre et le développement d’un système
ECVET pour la formation professionnelle initiale - Rapport final
Author (Corp. Body): European Commission / Directorate General for Education and Culture
Contributer: Forschungsinstitut Betriebliche Bildung | Bundesinstitut für Berufsbildung
Year: 2007
Language: en | de | fr
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: vocational educationevaluationEuropelife-long learningapprenticeship
Subject: Vocational education and training
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://www.ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of the EU decentralised agencies in 2009. Final Report Volume IV Evaluation method. December 2009. Evaluation
for the European Commission. ABAC Contracts No. 30-CE-0230814/00-05. Specific contract No 003-004
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. The evaluation process and method
2.1 Preparation phase
2.2 Inception phase
2.3 Data collection and analyses
2.4 Conclusions and recommendations
3. Difficulties encountered and solutions found
3.1 Only activities can be clustered, not agencies
3.2 Performance comparisons are not yet possible
3.3 Benchmarks are difficult to identify
3.4 Proposal for remedies
Appendix A –List of reviewed documents
B1 – Agency level documents
B2 – General documents
Appendix B –Interviewed organisations (agencies and stakeholders)
Author (Corp. Body): Euréval
Contributer: Rambøll Management | Matrix insight | Europäische Kommission
Year: 2009
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: ABAC Contracts No. 30-CE-0230814/00-05. Specific contract No 003-004
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationEUEuropean institutiontransparency
Subject: European Community institutions
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: EX ANTE EVALUATION : A PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR PREPARING PROPOSALS FOR EXPENDITURE PROGRAMMES
Title (other): ÉVALUATION EX ANTE : GUIDE PRATIQUE POUR L'ÉLABORATION DE PROPOSITIONS DE PROGRAMMES DE DÉPENSES
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION
2. WHY EX ANTE EVALUATION
2.1 Supporting programme preparation
2.2 Meeting formal requirements
3. WHEN, WHO AND WHAT
3.1 When?
3.2 Who?
3.3 What?
4. HOW TO DO IT?
4.1 Problem analysis and needs assessment
4.2 Objective setting and related indicators
4.3 Alternative delivery mechanisms and risk assessment
4.4 Added value of Community involvement
4.5 Lessons from the past
4.6 Planning future monitoring and evaluation
4.7 Helping to achieve cost-effectiveness
ANNEX 1: CHECK-LIST OF EX ANTE EVALUATION
ANNEX 2: THE COMMISSION COMMUNICATION ON EVALUATION (SEC(2000)1051)
ANNEX 3: EUROPEAN ADDED VALUE (EAV) AND OTHER RELATEDT TERMS
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Haushalt
Year: 2001
Language: en | fr
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationEUbudget document
Subject: European Community budget and financial management
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu.int/)
Title: Evaluating EU Activities. A practical guide for the Commission services
Table of Contents
Introduction
1 Evaluation in the Commission, its definition and scope
1.1 Definition and role of evaluation
1.1.1. Definition and role of evaluation
1.1.2. Characteristics and delimination of evaluation from other information tools
1.1.3. Evaluation variants
2 Profile, role, tasks and resources on the evaluation function
2.1.Profile and role of the evaluation function in the Commissions's services
2.1.2. Different modes of evaluation function
2.2 Basic tasks of evaluation function
2.2.1 Co-ordination of evaluation activities of the Commission services
2.2.2 Anticipation of the decision-making needs of Commission's services and establishment and implementation of annual plans and multi-annual evaluation programmes
2.2.3 Definition and promotion of quality standards and methods
2.2.4 Promoting the use of evaluation results in the decision-making process
2.3 Skills and resources of the evaluation function
3 DESIGNING AN EVALUATION
3.1 Mandate for an evaluation project
3.2 Evaluation questions
3.3 Drafting Terms of Reference
3.3.1 The purpose and justification of evaluation
3.3.2.Description of the activity to be evaluated
3.3.3 The scope of the evaluation
3.3.4 The main evaluation questions
3.3.5 The approach for data collection and analysis
3.3.6 The work plan, organisation and budget of the evaluation
3.3.7 Selection, exclusion and award criteria (in the case of external evaluator)
3.3.8 The structure of the final report
4 CONDUCTING EVALUATIONS
4.1 Steering Groups
4.1.1 Composition of the Steering Groups
4.1.2. Tasks of the Steering Group
4.2 Carrying out evaluations
4.2.1 Administrative set-up
4.2.2 Implementing the evaluation
4.2.3 Validation of evaluation reports
5 FINAL REPORTING, DISSEMINATION AND USE OF EVALUATION RESULTS
5.1 Reporting
5.2 Dissemination and disclosure of evaluation results
5.3 Channels for diffusing evaluation findings
5.4 Use of evalu
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Haushalt
Publisher: Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen
Year: 2004
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 92-894-7928-0 | KV-59-04-532-EN-C
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationEuropean CommissionEUfinancial managementmanualbudgetary policy
Subject: European Community budget and financial management
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu.int/)
Title: STUDY ON THE USE OF EVALUATION RESULTS IN THE COMMISSION. Final report. Dossier n°1: Synthesis report and Annexes
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
Contents
Introduction
1 Rationale, scope and questions of this study
1.1 Rationale and aims of the study
1.2 Scope of the study
1.3 Questions to be resolved
2 Methodology
2.1 Overview
2.2 The unit of analysis (the ABB Activity) and the choice for cases
3 Results
3.1 Survey
3.1.1 Implementation of the questionnaire and response
3.1.2 Analysis of statistical results
3.1.3 Other types of uses, not pre-identified by the questionnaire
3.1.4 Specific analysis of “free text” comments
3.2 Evaluation use as indicated in the Council, Parliament and Commission legislative proposals
3.3 Results from interviews
3.4 Overall case study results
4 Analysis
4.1 The users and the uses of the Commission’s evaluations
4.2 Contribution of evaluation to given objectives
4.2.1 Providing input for setting political priorities and choosing between different policy options
4.2.2 Support to the design of interventions
4.2.3 Support to the efficient allocation of resources
4.2.4 Support to implementation of interventions
4.2.5 Support of evaluation to increasing awareness and accountability on achievements
4.2.6 Conclusion
4.3 Factors that foster or discourage the use of evaluations at the level of individual evaluations
4.3.1 Evaluation planning and timing; purpose of the evaluation
4.3.2 Support of the senior management
4.3.3 Quality of the evaluation
4.3.4 Monitoring the follow-up of evaluation recommendations
4.3.5 Involvement of potential users
4.3.6 Human resources
4.3.7 Dissemination of evaluation results
4.3.8 Less important and “commonplace” factors
4.3.9 Relevance of different factors in the different stages of the evaluation project
4.4 Factors that foster or discourage the use of evaluations at the level of the organisation
4.4.1 Planning / Timing
4.4.2 Human and financial resources
4.4.3 Relationship with stakeholders
4.4.4 Evaluation Function<
Author (Corp. Body): European Policy Evaluation Consortium EPEC | Technopolis France
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Haushalt
Year: 2005
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationEuropean CommissionEUEuropean Policy
Subject: European Communities and European Union in general
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu.int/)
Title: STUDY ON THE USE OF EVALUATION RESULTS IN THE COMMISSION. Final report. Dossier n°2: case study reports
Table of Contents
Introduction
1 Unit of analysis (the ABB Activity) and the choice for cases
2 Guidelines for individual case study reports
3 ABB 02 02 Encouraging Entrepreneurship (ENTR)
3.1 Use of evaluation: main points to be learned from this case
3.2 Description of the activity
3.2.1 Overview
3.2.2 MAP
3.2.3 IDA
3.2.4 MGS Pilot scheme
3.2.5 FAS-evaluation
3.3 How evaluations and other “information sources” structure the activity
3.3.1 Introduction
3.3.2 MAP
3.3.3 IDA II
3.3.4 MGS
3.3.5 Miscellaneous
3.4 How is evaluation used within this activity?
3.4.1 Who are the users and what are the uses of the evaluations within this activity?
3.4.2 Types of use
3.4.3 Which factors have fostered or discouraged the use of the evaluations within this activity?
4 ABB 04 03 Work organisations and working conditions (EMPL)
4.1 Main points to be learned from this case
4.2 Description of the activity
4.3 How evaluations and other “information sources” intervene in structuring the activity
4.4 How is evaluation used within this activity?
4.4.1 Who are the users and what are the uses of the evaluations within this activity?
4.4.2 Factors that fostered or discouraged the use of the evaluations
5 ABB 05 04 02 Rural development (AGRI)
5.1 Main points to be learned from this case
5.2 Description of the activity
5.3 How evaluations and other “information sources” intervene in structuring the activity
5.4 How is evaluation used within this activity?
5.4.1 Who are the users and what are the uses of the evaluations within this activity?
5.4.2 To what extent have evaluations within this activity contributed to improvement(s)?
5.4.3 Which factors have fostered or discouraged the use of the evaluations within this activity?
6 ABB 0604 Conventional and renewable energies (TREN)
6.1 Use of evaluation: main points to be learned from this case
6.2 Description of the activity
6.3 How evaluations and othe
Author (Corp. Body): European Policy Evaluation Consortium EPEC | Technopolis France
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Haushalt
Year: 2005
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationEuropean CommissionEUEuropean Policy
Subject: European Communities and European Union in general
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu.int/)
Title: Study on the Use of Cost-effectiveness Analysis in EC’s Evaluations. Final report
Table of Contents
1. Objectives of the study
Context
Objectives and tasks
2. Definitions
Cost-effectiveness and efficiency
CEA in the case of complex interventions
Approaches to costing
Approaches to combining effects
Cost benefit analysis, another standpoint
3. Review of evaluation reports
Selection of 117 potentially interesting reports
Author (Corp. Body): Centre Européen d'Expertise en Evaluation
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Haushalt
Year: 2006
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationEuropean CommissionEUbudgetary policy
Subject: European Community budget and financial management
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation in the Commission. Reporting on Results. Annual Evaluation Review 2005. I. Conclusions and findings from
evaluations in the Commission
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
1. Introduction
2. Evaluation Highlights
2.1. Heading 1: Sustainable Growth
2.2. Heading 2: Preservation and Management of Natural Resources
2.3. Heading 3: Citizenship, Freedom, Security and Justice
2.4. Heading 4: The European Union as a Global Partner
3. The use of evaluation results in the Commission during 2005
Annex I – Overview of the evaluations completed in 2005
Economic and financial affairs
Enterprise
Competition
Employment and Social Affairs
Agriculture and Rural Development
Energy and Transport
Environment
Research
Information Society
Direct Research
Fisheries
Internal Market
Regional Policy
Taxation and Customs Union
Education and Culture
Press and Communication
Health and consumer protection
Freedom, Security and Justice
External Relations
Trade
External Relations, Development and Relations with African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) States
Enlargement
Humanitarian Aid
Commission's administration
Statistics
Annex II –Reporting on the performance of EU interventions
Economic and Financial Affairs
Enterprise
Competition
Agriculture and Rural Development
Energy and Transport
Environment
Research
Information Society
Direct Research
Fisheries
Internal Market
Regional Policy
Taxation and Customs Union
Education and Culture
Press and communication
Freedom, Security and Justice
External Relations, Development and Relations with ACP States
Trade
Enlargement
Humanitarian Aid
Commission's Administration
Statistics
Annex III – Preparing future activities
Economic and Financial Affairs
Enterprise
Employment and Social Affairs
Energy and Transport
Environment
Research
Information Society
Internal Market
Regional Policy
Fisheries
Taxation and Customs Union
Education and Culture
Press and communication
Health and cons
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Haushalt
Year: 2006
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationEuropean CommissionEUEuropean Policybudgetary policy
Subject: European Communities and European Union in generalEuropean Community budget and financial management
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation in the Commission. Reporting on Results. Annual Evaluation Review 2006. Conclusions and findings from
evaluations in the Commission
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. INTRODUCTION
2. EVALUATION HIGHLIGHTS
2.1. Financial Framework Heading 1: Sustainable Growth
2.2. Heading 2: Preservation and Management of Natural Resources
2.3 Heading 3: Citizenship, Freedom, Security and Justice
2.4 Heading 4: The European Union as a Global Partner
3. THE USE OF EVALUATION RESULTS IN THE COMMISSION DURING 2006
ANNEX I – SUMMARY LIST OF THE EVALUATIONS COMPLETED IN 2006
01 – Economic and Financial Affairs
02 – Enterprise and Industry
03 – Competition
04 – Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities
05 – Agriculture and Rural Development
06 – Energy and Transport
07 – Environment
08 – Research (RTD)
09 – Information Society and Media
11 – Fisheries and Maritime Affairs
12 – Internal Market and Services
13 – Regional Policy
14 – Taxation and Customs Union
15 – Education and Culture
16 – Communication
17 – Health and Consumer Protection
18 –Justice, Freedom and Security
19 – External Relations
20 – Trade
21 – Development and Relations with African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) States
22 – Enlargement
23 – Humanitarian Aid
26 – Commission's administration
29 – Statistics
ANNEX II –REPORTING ON THE PERFORMANCE OF EU INTERVENTIONS
Personnel and Administration
Agriculture and Rural Development
External Relations, Development and Relations with ACP States
Communication
Competition
Education and Culture
Economic and Financial Affairs
Humanitarian Aid
Enlargement
Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities
Enterprise and Industry
Environment
Statistics
Fisheries and Maritime Affairs
Information Society and Media
Justice, Freedom and Security
Internal Market and Services
Regional Policy
Research
Health and Consumer Protection
Translation
Taxation and Customs Union
Trade
Energy and Transport
ANNEX III – PREPARING FUTURE ACTIVITIES
Agricul
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Haushalt
Year: 2007
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationEuropean CommissionEUEuropean Policybudgetary policy
Subject: European Communities and European Union in generalEuropean Community budget and financial management
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Meta-study on decentralised agencies : cross-cutting analysis of evaluation findings ; Final Report.September 2008.
Evaluation for the European Commission. Contract ABAC-101930
Table of Contents
Summary
1 Introduction
1.1 Purpose of the study
1.2 Background
1.3 Scope of the analysis
1.4 Objective and structure of this report
2 Agencies: a first overall picture
3 Study methods
3.1 Main lines of the study method
3.2 Challenges and potential limitations
4 Agencies: the answered questions
4.1 Relevance
4.1.1 What are the tasks typically entrusted to the agencies?
4.1.2 Who are the final beneficiaries or addressees of the agencies’ outputs?
4.1.3 What have been the rationales of setting-up decentralised agencies and are the rationales still valid?
4.1.4 To what extent have the needs of the various clients / stakeholders been prioritised and matched?
4.1.5 Answering the overall relevance question
4.2 Coherence
4.2.1 To what extent are the agencies' objectives coherent with those of the EU policy served?
4.2.2 To what extent are the agencies' objectives coherent with those of other EU policies?
4.2.3 To what extent are the agencies' objectives coherent with EU cross-cutting priorities?
4.2.4 To what extent are the tasks of the different agencies coherent with one another?
4.2.5 To what extent are the agencies' activities coherent with other European and international institutions?
4.2.6 Answering the overall coherence question
4.3 Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness
4.3.1 What are the actual and expected results and impacts of the agencies’ tasks?
4.3.2 What are the added values that the agencies have provided (or are expected to provide) in fulfilling the Community tasks?
4.3.3 What were the costs of achieving the results and impacts of the agencies?
4.3.4 What are the effects of the different financing arrangements in place?
4.3.5 Have the agencies had any impact in term of proximity to and visibility by EU citizens? If so, which one/ones?
4.3.6 Overall answer to the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness question
4.4 Internal efficiency
4.4.1 What are the common characteristics of
Author (Corp. Body): Euréval Centre for European Evaluation Expertise
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Haushalt
Year: 2008
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationEuropean institutiontransparency
Subject: European Community institutions
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Meta-study on lessons from existing evaluations as an input to the Review of EU spending : Final Report ; January 2008.
Evaluation for the European Commission. Contract ABAC-101930
Table of Contents
Executive summary
Introduction
Frame, purpose and scope of the study
Methodological approach
Methodological limitations
Structure of this report
1. Synthesis of Evaluators’ assessments
1.1. Assessment per broad policy area
1.1.1. Competitiveness
1.1.2. Cohesion
1.1.3. Natural resources
1.1.4. Citizenship
1.1.5. Global partnership
1.2. Assessment per evaluation criterion
1.2.1. Relevance
1.2.2. Coherence
1.2.3. European added value
1.2.4. Effectiveness
1.2.5. Sustainability
1.2.6. Efficiency
1.2.7. Unintended impacts
2. Lessons learned
2.1. Designing policies that work
2.1.1. Prioritising objectives
2.1.2. Integrating cross-cutting issues
2.1.3. Formulating achievable strategies
2.1.4. Considering the after-policy period from the outset
2.2. Ensuring subsidiarity
2.2.1. Adding trans-national value
2.2.2. Dealing with critical mass
2.2.3. Changing systems
2.2.4. Securing local relevance
2.3. Spending wisely
2.3.1. Targeting participants and beneficiaries
2.3.2. Avoiding deadweight
2.3.3. Leveraging non-budgetary resources
2.3.4. Making use of financial engineering
2.3.5. Sharing the cost with other levels of government
2.4. Seeking results
2.4.1. Dealing with the pressure to spend
2.4.2. Questioning command-and-control approaches
2.4.3. Managing flexibility
2.4.4. Considering performance incentives
2.4.5. Learning from achievements
3. Challenges, solutions and knowledge transfer
3.1. Inducing structural changes
3.2. Targeting beneficiaries accurately
3.3. Decentralising whilst managing associated risks
3.4. Focusing on results rather than absorption
3.5. Promoting and monitoring leverage
Using this report
Appendix A – Database of available reports
A1 - Identifying the reports
A2 – Structure of the set of reports
A3 – Impartiality of the available reports
A4 - Assessing the potential interest of th
Author (Corp. Body): Euréval Centre for European Evaluation Expertise
Contributer: Ramboll Management | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Haushalt
Year: 2008
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationEUpromotional programbudget documentbudgetary policy
Subject: European Community institutionsEuropean Community financial managementEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIB
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Meta-study on lessons from existing evaluations as an input to the Review of EU spending. Final Report. January 2008.
Evaluation for the European Commission. Contract ABAC-101930
Table of Contents
Executive summary
Introduction
Frame, purpose and scope of the study
Methodological approach 1.1. Assessment per broad policy area
1.1.1. Competitiveness
1.1.2. Cohesion
1.1.3. Natural resources
1.1.4. Citizenship
1.1.5. Global partnership
1.2. Assessment per evaluation criterion
1.2.1. Relevance
1.2.2. Coherence
1.2.3. European added value
1.2.4. Effectiveness
1.2.5. Sustainability
1.2.6. Efficiency
1.2.7. Unintended impacts
2. Lessons learned
2.1. Designing policies that work
2.1.1. Prioritising objectives
2.1.2. Integrating cross-cutting issues
2.1.3. Formulating achievable strategies
2.1.4. Considering the after-policy period from the outset
2.2. Ensuring subsidiarity
2.2.1. Adding trans-national value
2.2.2. Dealing with critical mass
2.2.3. Changing systems
2.2.4. Securing local relevance
2.3. Spending wisely
2.3.1. Targeting participants and beneficiaries
2.3.2. Avoiding deadweight
2.3.3. Leveraging non-budgetary resources
2.3.4. Making use of financial engineering
2.3.5. Sharing the cost with other levels of government
2.4. Seeking results
2.4.1. Dealing with the pressure to spend
2.4.2. Questioning command-and-control approaches
2.4.3. Managing flexibility
2.4.4. Considering performance incentives
2.4.5. Learning from achievements
3. Challenges, solutions and knowledge transfer
3.1. Inducing structural changes
3.2. Targeting beneficiaries accurately
3.3. Decentralising whilst managing associated risks
3.4. Focusing on results rather than absorption
3.5. Promoting and monitoring leverage
Using this report
Appendix A – Database of available reports
A1 - Identifying the reports
A2 - Structure of the set of reports
A3 – Impartiality of the available reports
A4 - Assessing the potential interest of th
Author (Corp. Body): Euréval Centre for European Evaluation Expertise
Contributer: Ramboll Management | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Haushalt
Year: 2008
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationEUpromotional programbudget documentbudgetary policy
Subject: European Community institutionsEuropean Community financial managementEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIB
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9
« Previous
Next »
Copyright (C) 2003-2019 European Documentation Centres / Update: 09.10.2019