Suche nach Schlagworten '00002740'

49 entries found on 3 pages. starting on record 41 ending on 49

Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),

1 | 2 | 3
« Previous
Next »
Title: Screening report Montenegro : Chapter 13 – Fisheries
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission
Year: 2013
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EUjoining of the European UnionfisheryMontenegro
Subject: European Community external relationsFishing
Countries Scheme: Montenegro
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Review of Twinning in Turkey : Annexes to the final report ; In the context of the framework contract on Evaluation and
Evaluation-Related Services no. BUDG N°06/PO/01/003/101911
Table of Contents
Annex 1 Overview of Twinning in Turkey
1.1 The Twinning instrument
1.2 The key actors involved in Twinning projects
1.3 Turkey’s steps towards EU accession
1.4 Twinning in Turkey
Annex 2 Detailed analysis of Interim Evaluation Reports
2.1 Overall assessment
2.2 Performance ratings per project
2.3 Analysis per criterion and sector
2.4 List of Interim Evaluation Reports
Annex 3 Interview Reports
Annex 4 Sector reports
2.1 Justice and home affairs
2.2 Environment
2.3 Energy
2.4 Transport
2.5 Finance
2.6 Agriculture and Fisheries
2.7 Internal market
Annex 5 Case studies of successful Twinnings
5.1 Overview
5.2 TR0404.04 Development of a training system for border police
5.3TR 0601.01 Support to the set up of an Asylum and Country of Originsystem
5.4 TR0603.05 Strengthening the capacity of the Turkish Grand NationalAssembly
5.5 TR0603.04 Water sector capacity building
5.6 TR0603.03 Improvement of the conditions for Cross Border Electricity Trade
5.7 TR0302.05 Strengthening the audit capacity of the Turkish Court of Accounts
5.8 TR0503.05 Establishment of an IPA Rural Development Agency
5.8 TR0403.01 Customs Modernization Project II
Annex 6 Case studies of less successful Twinnings
6.1 Overview
6.2 TR0501.05 An independent police complaints commission
6.3 TR0601.03 Training of gendarmerie office on European rights standards
6.4 TR0404.03 Enhancement of professionalism of the Turkish Gendarmerie
6.5 TR0403.08 Assistance to the Turkish road transport sector
6.6 TR0202.01 Institutional strengthening of the Energy Market Regulatory Authority
6.7 TR0403.02 Tax administration capacity building
6.8 TR0403.03 Restructuring and strengthening of the food safety and control system
6.9 TR0503.01 Reinforcement of the institutional capacity for establishing a product safety system
Annex 7 Round table meetings
Annex 8 Analysis of success and fail factors
Author: Pot, Ferdinand ; 1055740252 | Blomeyer, Roland | Geveci, Sevil
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung | ECORYS NEI, Rotterdam
Year: 2011
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: BUDG N°06/PO/01/003/101911
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: domestic marketenergyEUjoining of the European Unioncase studyfinancefisherydomestic policy
judiciaryagricultureneighborhood helptransportationTurkeyenvironment
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesTurkey
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Review of Twinning in Turkey : Final report ; In the context of the framework contract on Evaluation and
Evaluation-Related Services no. BUDG N°06/PO/01/003/101911
Abstract
ECORYS has been contracted through the framework contract on Evaluation and Evaluation-related services (BUDG N°06/PO/01/Lot N°3) of DG Budget of the European Commission to prepare a thematic evaluation on the assistance provided by the EC to Turkey through the Twinning instrument.The object of this evaluation report is the Twinning instrument as it has been applied in Turkey in the period 2002 - 2009. In this period, 92 Twinning projects in Turkey were initiated and financed under the Pre-accession assistance and IPA programmes by the European Commission.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
List of Abbreviations
Executive Summary
1 Background of the Evaluation
1.1 Object of the Evaluation
1.2 Objective of the Evaluation
...
1.3 Methodological Framework
...
1.4 Structure of the Report
2 Relevance
2.1 General notes
2.2 Has the underlying strategic rationale and design of Twinning assistance been appropriate for Turkey, at programme/sectoral levels?
2.3 Has Twinning been used in the circumstances foreseen in the Commission’s Twinning Manual?
2.4 Are there certain sectors or Accession Partnership fields in Turkey where Twinning could be an adequate tool but is not used?
2.5 Can synergies be identified between Twinning and other types of EC projects, and/or with projects funded by other donors?
2.6 Is the needs assessment relevant, i.e. are mandatory results precisely defined in the Project Fiches
2.7 Is the interaction between key stakeholders (beneficiary institutions, ECD, DG ELARG) adequate and performing efficiently to ensure successful programming of Twinning?
3 Efficiency
3.1 General notes
3.2 Are inputs/activities being efficiently transferred into the planned outputs?
3.3 Is the selection of twinning (as opposed to any other instrument, i.e.Technical Assistance or Direct Agreements) adequately assessed and justified?
6 Review of Twinning in Turkey: Final Report3.4 Could the same results and impacts be achieved more cost-effectively?
4 Effectiveness
4.1 General notes
4.2 Has the Twinning support under evaluation achieved (or will likely to achieve in the case of ongoing support) the objectives pursued?
4.3 Are quality and quantity of resources allocated by both beneficiary and the Member State/Twinning partner appropriate?
4.4 Is the interaction between key stakeholders adequate and performing effectively to ensure successful implementation of Twinning?
5 Impact
5.1 General notes
...
6. Sustainablity
...
7 Horizontal evaluation questions
...
Author: Pot, Ferdinand ; 1055740252 | Blomeyer, Roland | Geveci, Sevil
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung | ECORYS NEI, Rotterdam
Year: 2011
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: BUDG N°06/PO/01/003/101911
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: domestic marketenergyEUjoining of the European Unioncase studyfinancefisherydomestic policy
judiciaryagricultureneighborhood helptransportationTurkeyenvironment
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesTurkey
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Report of the Ad Hoc EIFAC/EC Working Party on Market Perspectives for European Freshwater Aquaculture
Title (other): Brussels, Belgium, 14-16 May 2001
Abstract
The ad hoc EIFAC/EC Working Party on Market Perspectives of European Freshwater Aquaculture met to address the current situation of the freshwater aquaculture sector in the EIFAC region with particular focus on problems in marketing. The outcome of the workshop aims to provide key information and strategic advice on how to fulfil the production potential of the sector to (i) policy makers, administrators and legislators; (ii) future investors; (iii) consumers, and, particularly, (iv) producers. Trout and carp (about 94 per cent) dominate European aquaculture, whereas there are other promising candidates for culture that have not been profitably exploited. The freshwater aquaculture industry in Europe is product or producer driven along traditional lines and suffers particularly from a lack of vertical integration, linking producers to consumers through the marketing chain. The producers will remain at a disadvantage unless they develop better links through association or cooperation. While the preparation and implementation of marketing plans is a responsibility of the industry, and must be financed from this source, additional progress and great benefit could be derived from a comprehensive policy framework. Aquaculture as a food producing system in some cases has been perceived as being in conflict with other parts of the ecosystem. This can best be addressed by the development and dissemination of codes of good aquaculture practice. While the demand for organically produced aquaculture products is growing, certification is still largely based on the standards of private certification bodies.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
1. Background
2. Status of European freshwater aquaculture
3. Regulatory framework
4. Production, products and sales
5. Food quality and safety, traceability and labelling
6. Impact on trade of environmental and health/hygiene
Legislation: a trade barrier?
7. Markets, distribution and trade
8. New markets, new competitors and promotion
9. Conclusions and recommendations
Appendix 1 Agenda
Appendix 2 List of participants
Appendix 3 Summary of some codes of conduct and certification programmes that impact on the aquaculture sector
Appendix 4 Strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats table
Appendix 5 Papers presented
Series Title: EIFAC Occasional Paper ; 35
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Fischerei
Contributer: European Inland Fisheries Advisory Commission
Year: 2001
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: AquacultureCommon Fisheries PolicyFishery policyEUfisherymarketing
Subject: Fishery products. Aquatic fauna. Fishery production
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the documentQuelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Analysis of impact variables resulting from research projects in the fisheries and aquaculture domain of the European
Commission’s FAIR Programme (1994-1998)
Title (other): FAIR PROGRAMME: Fisheries and Aquaculture Project Analysis | Fisheries- and Agro-Industrial Research = FAIR
Abstract
This report evaluates impact criteria of projects from FAIR Area 5 (Fisheries and aquaculture) and from FAIR Area 3 (Generic science and advanced technologies for nutritious foods) pertaining to fisheries and aquaculture. Since impact measurements are ambiguous and no proper protocol had been established, the methodology with which these projects were evaluated is described below in detail. The basis for this report were 134 research projects from FAIR Area 5 and 24 from Area 3. Objective: The main objective of this report was to assess output variables related to impact of the FAIR programmes’ projects. The projects were classified by domains and data provided by each projects’ coordinator was compiled and analyzed in order to determine the scope and range of impact on the scientific community, the Community level, legislation and advisory boards. [Gesche Pluem]
Table of Contents
Disclaimer
1. Introduction
2. Approach & Methodology
Step 1 - Updating Information, Step 2 - Compilation, Step 3 - Analysis.
Most frequently encountered discrepancies and problems
3. Results
4. Conclusions
Annex 1 – Documents
Annex 2 – Analysis details
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission
Year: 2003
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: AquacultureCommon Fisheries PolicyFishery policyScience and technology policyProject evaluationEUfishery
Subject: Fishery economics. Fishery research
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the documentQuelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Analysis of specific scientific domains covering key action 5 of QoL (5FP) in the fields of fisheries and aquaculture
(1998 – 2002)
Abstract
Research proposals of direct interest for DG Fish in the 5th Framework Programme (FP5) concern three key actions (KA) of the thematic programme "Quality of Life" (QoL): KA 1 (Food, nutrition and health), KA 2 (Control of infectious diseases)and KA 5 (Sustainable agriculture, fisheries and forestry). Most of the selected projects (88%) were funded under the specific Key Action 5 “Sustainable agriculture, fisheries and forestry, and integrated development of rural areas including mountain areas”. As all the calls covering QoL thematic programmes are closed, it is now possible to make an assessment of the accepted projects.The present analysis covers the field of fisheries and aquaculture under KA 5.Objectives: The main objective of the present study was to analyze the research projects funded under KA 5 and to classify them by specific scientific domains in orderto establish to what extent they covered the research objectives of the QoL Work Programme in the field of fisheries and aquaculture. The proposed classification is intended to give a clear picture of the situation and to provide research institutions and policy makers information on how theresearch projects cover the different priorities. [Laura Gagliardini Anibaldi]
Table of Contents
1.Introduction
2.Objectives
3.Approach and Methodology
4.Results
4.1 Overview breakdown of QoL projects in KA 5
4.2 Overview breakdown of SME Co-operative projects
4.3 Clustering of projects
4.4 Classification
5.Conclusions<
br>
Annex 1: Scientific domains
Annex 2: Summary Matrix
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission
Year: 2002
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: AquacultureCommon Fisheries PolicyFishery policyScience and technology policyProject evaluationEUfishery
Subject: Fishery economics. Fishery research
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document! Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Farmed fish and welfare
Abstract
Societal and political backgroundTraditionally, the welfare of fish compared to welfare of other, land farmed animalshas not been an important topic to consumers, producers and legislators, an attitudewhich is reflected in past research projects and legislation directed towards welfare,which hardly ever took fish into consideration. So why was and is fish, compared toother animals, not a hot topic regarding welfare concerns? First, there is a lack oftradition in perceiving fish as sentient beings as fish do not evoke compassion andconcern in humans in the same way other, warm-blooded animals do; second, there isstill no consensus among scientists wether fish are able to perceive pain and to suffer;third, large scale, industrialised aquaculture is a relatively recent farming method.Nevertheless, an increased concern for the welfare of fish in general and especially inaquaculture can be noticed in recent year, stimulated by research results suggestingawareness of pain and suffering, and reports on farming conditions detrimental tohealth and welfare. [Tanja Wolffrom]
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
REPORT
1 Societal and political background
2 Welfare – general introduction
3 Pain and discomfort in fish
4 Welfare indicators
4.1 Physiological indicators
4.2 Behavioural indicators
4.3 Other indicators
5 Welfare issues
5.1 Fish densities in farming
5.2 Environmental parameters
5.3 Malnutrition
5.4 Food deprivation
5.5 Cataracts
5.6 Deformities
5.6.1 Skeletal deformities
5.6.2 Tissue deformities
5.7 Vaccination – side effects
5.8 Genetics
5.9 Transport
5.10 Pre-slaughter handling
5.11 Stunning /sedation
5.12 Organic production
6 Past and current EC research projects on welfare issues
7 Welfare – Economic value and product quality
8 Legislation
9 Acknowledgements
10 References
Author: Lopes dos Santos, Mario
Contributer: Europäische Kommission | GD Fischerei | Directorate General for Fisheries, Research and Scientific Analysis Unit (A )
Year: 2004
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: AquacultureCommon Fisheries PolicyFishery protectionEUfishery
Subject: Fishery products. Aquatic fauna. Fishery production
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document! Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of the European Union’s cooperation with the Pacific Region 2006 - 2012 : Final Report ; Volume 1
Title (other): Evaluation of the European Union’s cooperation with the Pacific Region 2006 - 2012 : Final Report ; Volume 2 – Annexes
1 - 7 | Fiche Contradictoire : Evaluation of the European Union’s regional cooperation with Pacific (Regional level
evaluation) ; Ref. Ares(2016)2681183 | Quality Grid : Evaluation of the European Union's regional Cooperation with
Pacific Region ; Final Report ( September 2014 ) | Evaluation of the European Union’s cooperation with the Pacific
Region 2006 - 2012 : Final Report ; Executive Summary | Evaluation of the European Union’s cooperation with the Pacific
Region 2006 - 2012 : Final Report ; Volume 3 – Annexes 8 - 15
Abstract
This evaluation aims to provide an overall independent assessment of the European Union’s cooperation and partnership relations with the Pacific region over 2006-2012. On the basis of this assessment, it provides recommendations to improve the EU’s current and future strategies, programmes and actions. The evaluation scope covers regional cooperation implemented in 15 Pacific island states and four Overseas Countries and Territories of the EU Member States. Country-level cooperation is also considered, but only insofar as it aides assessment of the coherence and complementarity of the regional cooperation. The key challenge faced by the evaluators was to provide an accurate assessment of EU regional cooperation across such a diverse and disparate range of partner countries and territories.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 THE FINAL REPORT2. EVALUATION CONTEXT AND METHODOLOGY
2.1 CONTEXT OF EU-PACIFIC COOPERATION
2.2 EU-PACIFIC REGIONAL COOPERATION OVER THE EVALUATION PERIOD
2.3 THE INTERVENTION LOGIC OF EU-PACIFIC COOPERATION
2.4 THE EVALUATION QUESTIONS
2.5 METHODOLOGICAL DESIGN AND DATA COLLECTION
3. FINDINGS PER EVALUATION QUESTION
3.1 EQ1 ON ALIGNMENT AND EVOLVING NEEDS
3.2 EQ2 ON STRATEGIC OPTIONS
3.3 EQ3 ON REGIONAL INTEGRATION AND TRADE
3.4 EQ4 ON EDUCATION AND TVET
3.5 EQ5 ON SUSTAINABLE ENERGY ACCESS
3.6 EQ6 ON LAND RESOURCE MANAGEMENT AND CLIMATE CHANGE
3.7 EQ7 ON FISHERIES & MARINE RESOURCES MANAGEMENT
3.8 EQ8 ON REGIONAL INSTITUTIONAL CAPACITY BUILDING
3.9 EQ9 ON DELIVERY MECHANISMS
3.10 EQ10 ON DONORS’ COORDINATION AND COMPLEMENTARITY
4. CONCLUSIONS
5. RECOMMENDATIONS
List of tables
List of figures
List of boxes
| VOLUME2 – ANNEXES 1-7
ANNEX 1 – TERMS OF REFERENCE
ANNEX 2 – REGIONAL AND COOPERATION CONTEXT
ANNEX 3 – THE INTERVENTION LOGIC OF EU REGIONAL COOPERATION
ANNEX 4 – ANALYSIS OF EU-PACIFIC COOPERATION ACTIVITIES
ANNEX 5 – INVENTORY OF EU PACIFIC INTERVENTIONS 2006-2012
ANNEX 6 – SECTOR OVERVIEWS
ANNEX 7 – INTERVENTION FICHE
VOLUME 3 –ANNEXES 8-15
ANNEX 8 – DATACOLLECTION GRIDS
ANNEX 9 – REGIONAL ORGANISATIONS OVERVIEW
ANNEX 10 – SUMMARY OF PIFS AND SPC ACCOUNTS
ANNEX 11 – SUMMARY MARKET ACCESS INDICATORS
ANNEX 12 – PACIFIC ISLANDS DIRECTION OF TRADE
ANNEX 13 – LIST OF PERSONS MET
ANNEX 14 – MINUTES OF THE DISSEMINATION SEMINAR
ANNEX 15 – BIBLIOGRAPHY
Author (Corp. Body): ADE
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | itad | COWI
Year: 2014
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Framework Contract No EVA 2011/Lot 3 | Specific Contract N°2013/305121 | Ref. Ares(2016)2681183
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationeducationenergydevelopment aidEUfisherycommerceclimate change
cooperationseasustainable developmentpartnershipPacific Rimprogramregional interrelation
Subject: Development aid. Aid programmes and aid organizationsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Screening report Serbia : Chapter 13 – Fisheries
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Directorate General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations
Year: 2015
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: MD 103/15
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EUjoining of the European UnionfisherySerbia
Subject: European Community external relationsFishing
Countries Scheme: Serbia
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
1 | 2 | 3
« Previous
Next »
Copyright (C) 2003-2019 European Documentation Centres / Update: 09.10.2019