Suche nach Schlagworten '00002740'

In the reform of the common fisheries policy (CFP) adopted in December 2002, emphasis was put on the improvement of the scientific basis for the advice needed by the EU for fisheries management. Today, more than ever before, when so many fish stocks are heavily exploited, decisions on fisheries management need a solid basis in science. The relevance and effectiveness of measures taken under the CFP depend to a large extent on the quality and timeliness of the scientific advice on which they are based. The European Commission also recognises the importance of aquaculture in the framework of the reform and the necessity to develop a strategy for the sustainable development of this sector supported by EU-wide research. Finally, assuring the quality and safety of the seafood supply in response to consumer needs while enhancing the competitiveness of the European seafood industry is also a priority for the Fisheries DG. Research activities carried out under the fifth framework programme in the field of fisheries concerned three key actions of the thematic programme 'Quality of life' (QoL): 'Food, nutrition and health', 'Control of infectious diseases' and 'Sustainable agriculture, fisheries and forestry, and integrated development of rural areas including mountain areas'. Special attention was given to quality monitoring and traceability throughout the food chain, to the development of strategies to identify and control infectious diseases, to the improvement of the scientific basis for fisheries management, to the improvement of aquatic production, to the integration of environmental requirements, and to the investigation of the economic dimension of sustainable fishing and aquaculture.[Author vide copyright]

Gegenstand dieser Studie ist das aktuelle EU-Fischereirecht und dessen Wirksamkeit bei der Realisierung politischer Zielsetzungen wie der Steigerung der Fanggerätselektivität, der Reduzierung der Auswirkungen von Rückwürfen, dem Schutz mariner Lebensräume und Ökosysteme sowie der Umsetzung des MSY-Konzepts. Darüber hinaus wird die Effektivität von Mindestanlandegrößen und Sperrgebieten als Erhaltungsinstrumente beleuchtet, und es werden die jeweiligen Vorzüge des Top-down- und des Bottom-up-Ansatzes für die Festlegung von technischen Maßnahmen erörtert. Diese Fragen werden im Zusammenhang mit der Überarbeitung von EU-Regelungen zu technischen Maßnahmen betrachtet. [Stuart A. Reeves, Andrew S. Revill, Trevor P. Hutton, John K. Pinnegar] | This study reviews current EU fisheries legislation and its effectiveness in achieving policy objectives related to increasing gear selectivity, reducing the impact of discarding, protecting marine habitats and ecosystems and implementing the MSY approach. The study also reviews the effectiveness of minimum landing sizes and area closures as conservation instruments, and also discusses the relative merits of top-down and bottom-up approaches to establishing technical measures. These issues are discussed in relation to the revision of EU technical measures regulations.[Stuart A. Reeves, Andrew S. Revill, Trevor P. Hutton, John K. Pinnegar]

• Employment data, including gender differentials, for each main discrete occupation within the fisheries sector i.e.: fishing, aquaculture, marketing & distribution, processing, administration & management and informal (especially unpaid spouses support). • Legal and social status; women’s legal position concerning involvement in the sector, and problems inherent in this. • Organisational, concerning how women are organised within the industry (e.g. unions), what formal support systems there are (e.g. childcare) and how education serves women in the sector. • Socio-cultural constraints, resolved into three aspects – external social factors that effect women’s decisions, the social status (thus desirability) of fisheries occupations and “internal” psychological factors related to women’s interests, aspirations and concerns. • Economic, mainly concerned with the respective earnings for various fisheries occupations, and particularly with gender related earnings discounts and economic alternatives. Copyright authors

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 INTRODUCTION
2 CONTEXT
3 LITERATURE REVIEW
4 KEY SURVEYS (TORS 1 TO 4)
5 ANALYSIS & RECOMMENDATIONS (TORS 5 TO 6)
19 TABLES
5 ANNEXES Copyright authors | TOR = THE TERMS OF REFERENCE:
TOR 1 Characterisation of EU fisheries employment, specifically identifying women’s roles (including informal/unpaid work)
TOR 2 Defining social status and legal rights of women in EU fisheries, specifically identifying deficiencies
TOR 3 A comparative assessment of the women’s organisational support within EU fisheries
TOR 4 A comparative investigation of problems and obstacles preventing women’s greater involvement in EU fisheries
TOR 5 A comparative investigation of the opportunity and potential for women’s involvement in EU fisheries and adjacent activities
TOR 6 Analysis and presentation of potential interventions to solve the problems and exploit the opportunities identified above, with a view to gender equality and socioeconomic development in FDAs
TOR 7 In parallel with the above, an analysis of women’s roles in significant fisheries activities in areas not otherwise dependent upon fisheries (non FDAs) – e.g. inland aquaculture and urban fish processing

This guidance document is aimed at national authorities in charge of programming 2007- 2013 EFF interventions and specifically at those responsible for organising the ex ante evaluation. It provides guidance which will also be of use for the evaluators who are appointed to carry out the ex ante evaluation. The working paper clarifies, in an indicative way, the content and organisation of an ex ante evaluation. It builds on the practice gained in the ex ante evaluation during the 2000-2006 programming period while taking into account the new regulatory context for the 2007-2013 period, in terms of the content of the Operational programmes and requirements for their evaluation. Member States should use the guidance flexibly, adapting it to their specific requirements in order to ensure that the ex ante evaluation meets their needs. Copyright authors.

PART 1:
2. PART 2: EX ANTE EVALUATION – KEY COMPONENTS
3. PART 3: EX ANTE EVALUATION – THE PROCESS
ANNEX 1 : EX ANTE EVALUATION AND THE STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
ANNEX II – TERMS OF REFERENCE
BIBLIOGRAPHY Copyright authors.