Suche nach Schlagworten '00003183'

7 entries found on 1 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 7

Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),

« Previous
Next »
Title: Study on the application of Council Regulation (EC) N° 1206/2001, on cooperation between the courts of the member
states in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matter
Title (other): ANNEX I – Full answers received. Our Reference: FINAL_REPORT_1206_AnnexI_09032007
Table of Contents
QUESTIONNAIRES 1 AND 3 (GENERAL ONES)
QUESTIONNAIRE 2 (CENTRAL AUTHORITIES)
Author (Corp. Body): mainstrat
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Inneres
Year: 2007
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: courtCommercial Lawcivil law
Subject: European Community law in generalCivil law in generalCommercial law. Economic law
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Study on the application of Council Regulation (EC) N° 1206/2001, on cooperation between the courts of the member
states in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matter
Title (other): ANNEX III – Questionnaires.Our Reference: FINAL_REPORT_1206_AnnexIII_09032007
Author (Corp. Body): mainstrat
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Inneres
Year: 2007
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: courtCommercial Lawcivil law
Subject: European Community law in generalCivil law in generalCommercial law. Economic law
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Study on the application of Council Regulation (EC) N° 1206/2001, on cooperation between the courts of the member
states in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial matter
Title (other): Our Reference: FINAL_REPORT_1206_A_09032007
Table of Contents
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
2 FRAMEWORK OF THE STUDY
2.1 CONTEXTUAL FRAMEWORK OF THE STUDY. THE 1206/2001 REGULATION
2.1.1 INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND
2.1.1.1 Binding all the Member States
2.1.2 THE CREATION OF AN AREA OF FREEDOM, SECURITY AND JUSTICE IN THE EU
2.2 THE CONTENT OF THE REGULATION
2.2.1 ADOPTION OF REGULATION 1206/2001 (“the Regulation”)
2.2.1.1 Relationship of Regulation 1206 with the European Judicial Network
2.2.1.2 Transitional measures and relationship with other regulatory instruments
2.2.2 SCOPE OF THE REGULATION
2.2.2.1 Introduction
2.2.2.2 Territorial scope
2.2.3 BRIEF ANALYSIS OF THE METHODS FOR TAKING OF EVIDENCE IN THE REGULATION
2.2.4 PURPOSE OF THE REGULATION. AN EX-ANTE EVALUATION
2.3 OUR TASK IN CURRENT STUDY
3 STUDY METHODOLOGY
3.1 METHODOLOGY
3.1.1 Objectives
3.1.2 Approach taken
3.1.2.1 Groups of Professionals
3.1.3 The Results
3.1.3.1 Targets for the Survey
3.1.3.2 Information-gathering procedure
3.2 THE TEAM FOR THE CURRENT STUDY
4 STUDY FINDINGS
4.1.1 Objectives of Regulation 1206/2001
4.1.2 Speed of obtaining evidence
4.1.3 Central bodies referred to in Article 3.1
4.1.3.1 Effectiveness of the central bodies
4.1.3.2 Participation of the central bodies
4.1.4 Competent authorities referred to in Article 3(3)
4.1.4.1 Conclusions
4.1.4.2 Proposals
4.1.5 The request: simplicity, clarity and legal certainty
4.1.6 Communications technology
4.1.6.1 Means of communication
4.1.6.2 The impact of communications technology
4.1.6.3 Use of the “swiftest possible means”
4.1.7 The economic cost of assistance
4.1.7.1 Conclusions
4.1.7.2 Proposals
4.1.8 Courts referred to in Article 2(2)
4.1.8.1 Conclusions
4.1.8.2 Proposals
4.1.9 The direct transmission system
4.1.9.1 The system of direct transmission between judges
4.1.9.2 Receipt of the request
4.1.9.3 Autonomous procedural law
4.1.9.4
Author (Corp. Body): mainstrat
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Inneres
Year: 2007
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: courtCommercial Lawcivil law
Subject: European Community law in generalCivil law in generalCommercial law. Economic law
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: PRAKTISCHER LEITFADEN FÜR DIE ANWENDUNG DER VERORDNUNG ÜBER DIE BEWEISAUFNAHME : (Verordnung (EG) Nr. 1206/2001 des
Rates vom 28. Mai 2001 über die Zusammenarbeit zwischen den Gerichten der Mitgliedstaaten auf dem Gebiet der
Beweisaufnahme in Zivil- oder Handelssachen)
Title (other): PRACTICE GUIDE FOR THE APPLICATION OF THE REGULATION ON THE TAKING OF EVIDENCE : (Council Regulation (EC) No 1206/2001
of 28 May 2001 on cooperation between the courts of the Member States in the taking of evidence in civil or commercial
matters) | GUIDE PRATIQUE POUR L'APPLICATION DU REGLEMENT RELATIF A L'OBTENTION DES PREUVES : [Règlement (CE) n°
1206/2001 du Conseil du 28 mai 2001 relatif à la coopération entre les juridictions des États membres dans le domaine
de l'obtention des preuves en matière civile ou commerciale]
Table of Contents
I. Einführung
II. Zielsetzung der Verordnung
III. Sachlicher Anwendungsbereich der Verordnung
IV. Gerichte und Behörden
V. Verfahren der Beweisaufnahme
A. Zwei unterschiedliche Verfahren
B. Ersuchen des ersuchenden Gerichts an das zuständige Gericht (Artikel 4–16)
a) Übermittlung der Ersuchen
a1) Form und Inhalt
a2) Besondere Ersuchen
a3) Zügige Übermittlung der Ersuchen und der sonstigen Mitteilungen
a4) Sprachen
a5) Keine Beglaubigung der Ersuchen
b) Entgegennahme der Ersuchen
b1) Empfangsbestätigung
b2) Unvollständiges Ersuchen
c) Beweisaufnahme durch das ersuchte Gericht
c1) Fristen
c2) Bei der Erledigung der Ersuchen anzuwendendes Recht (Artikel 10
c3) Zwangsmaßnahmen
c4) Erledigung des Ersuchens in Anwesenheit und unter Beteiligung der Parteien oder von Beauftragten des ersuchenden Gerichtsd) Ablehnung der Erledigung des Ersuchens
d1) Recht oder Pflicht zur Aussageverweigerung
d2) Sonstige Ablehnungsgründe
d3) Öffentliche Ordnung kein Ablehnungsgrund
d4) Folgen der Ablehnung
e) Mitteilung über Verzögerungen oder über die Ablehnung durch das ersuchte Gericht
f) Verfahren nach Erledigung des Ersuchens
C. Unmittelbare Beweisaufnahme durch das ersuchende Gericht (Artikel 17)
D. Vorschriften für den Einsatz moderner Kommunikationsmittel
Anhang I: Verfahren der Beweisaufnahme
Anhang II: Ersuchen an das zuständige Gericht
Anhang III: Unmittelbare Beweisaufnahme (Artikel 17)
Anhang IV: Standardformblätter (Anhang)
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission
Year: 2006
Language: en | de | fr
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evidenceEUcourtCommercial Lawcivil law
Subject: European Community law in generalCivil lawCommercial law. Economic lawAdministrative law in general
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu.int/)
Title: Study to inform an Impact Assessment on the Ratification of the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements by the
European Community : Final Report
Table of Contents
GLOSSARY
1 INTRODUCTION
2 PROBLEM ASSESSMENT
3 POLICY OBJECTIVES
4 THE POLICY OPTIONS
5 THE IMPACTS OF THE POLICY OPTIONS
6 COMPARISON OF THE POLICY OPTIONS
7 ELABORATION OF THE PREFERRED OPTION
8 MONITORING AND EVALUATION
ANNEX 1 - ANALYSIS OF PREVIOUS CONSULTATIONS: CONTRIBUTION TO THE CONSULTATION PAPER
ANNEX 2 –COMPANIES AND OTHER STAKEHOLDERS INTERVIEWED
ANNEX 3 – LIST OF RESPONDENTS TO THE CONSULTATION PAPER
ANNEX 4 THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE HAGUE CONVENTION TO THE BRUSSELS REGIMEAND EU LAW
ANNEX 5 – BIBLIOGRAPHY
Author (Corp. Body): ICF GHK
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz, Freiheit und Sicherheit
Year: 2007
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EUEuropean LawcourtCommercial Lawprivate lawratification
Subject: European Community treaties and agreementsContracts and guaranteesCommercial law. Economic law
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Study on the assessment of Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 and the policy options for its amendment : Final report ;
Evaluation
Abstract
The present report constitutes the Final Report of the “Study on the assessment of Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 (‘Brussels IIa’ Regulation) and the policy options for its amendment”, carried out by Deloitte on behalf of the European Commission, Directorate-General for Justice. It presents the completed Evaluation of the Brussels IIa Regulation, which looks into the Relevance, Coherence, Effectiveness, Efficiency, as well as EU added value and utility of this instrument. The assessment of Effectiveness in the main body of the report is conducted at the level of the specific and general objectives. A more detailed analysis of this evaluation criterion, at the level of the operational objectives, is presented in the separate volume of Analytical annexes. The Impact Assessment on the Regulation, which was conducted within the framework of the same assignment, and was based on this Evaluation, is provided in an other separate volume. [Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
1 Introduction to the report
2 Objectives and scope of the Evaluation and the Impact Assessment Study
2.1 Objectives of the Evaluation and the Impact Assessment Study
2.2 Scope of the Study
3 Evaluation of the Brussels IIa Regulation
3.1 Relevance
3.1.1 Evolution of the initial problem
3.1.2 The relevance of the scope of the Regulation in view of the current needs or problems faced by EU citizens
3.2 Coherence
3.2.1 Delineation of scope with other EU instruments
3.2.2 Interrelationships between the Regulation and relevant Conventions
3.2.3 Interrelationship with the Nordic Convention
3.3 Effectiveness
3.3.1 Achievement of the specific objectives
3.3.2 Achievement of the general objectives
3.3.3 Challenges and additional measures affecting the application of the Brussels IIa Regulation in the Member States
3.4 Efficiency
3.4.1 Effects of the Brussels IIa Regulation on the additional costs of the cross - border cases covered by the Regulation compared to domestic proceedings
3.4.2 Costs of the Regulation
3.4.3 Could the same effects have been achieved at lower costs?
3.4.4 Possible simplification of the Regulation
3.5 EU added value and utility
3.5.1 EU added value
3.5.2 Utility
3.6 Main conclusions of the evaluation
3.6.1 Relevance
3.6.2 Coherence
3.6.3 Effectiveness
3.6.4 Efficiency
3.6.5 EU added value and utility
Author (Corp. Body): Deloitte
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Verbraucher | coffey
Year: 2015
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978-92-79-45907-8 | 2443-5228 | DS-AU-15-001-EN-N
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationmarriageEUfamily lawcourtchildlawlegal usage
Subject: European Community law in generalFamily lawAdministrative procedures
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Study on the assessment of Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 and the policy options for its amendment : Final report ;
Analytical annexes
Abstract
The present report constitutes the Final Report of the “Study on the assessment of Regulation (EC) No 2201/2003 (‘Brussels IIa’ Regulation) and the policy options for its amendment”, carried out by Deloitte on behalf of the European Commission, Directorate-General for Justice. It presents the completed Evaluation of the Brussels IIa Regulation, which looks into the Relevance, Coherence, Effectiveness, Efficiency, as well as EU added value and utility of this instrument. The assessment of Effectiveness in the main body of the report is conducted at the level of the specific and general objectives. A more detailed analysis of this evaluation criterion, at the level of the operational objectives, is presented in the separate volume of Analytical annexes. The Impact Assessment on the Regulation, which was conducted within the framework of the same assignment, and was based on this Evaluation, is provided in an other separate volume. [Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Annex 1. Analysis of the effectiveness of the Brussels IIa Regulation at the level of the operational objectives
...
Annex 2. Context of the Brussels IIa Regulation
...
Annex 3. Contextual factors and unsubstantiated issues
...
Annex 4. Analysis of the public consultation
...
Annex 5. Assessment of the impact of options proposed for non-priority legal issues
...
Annex 6. Quantitative analysis
...
Annex 7. Compliance costs and stress
Author (Corp. Body): Deloitte
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Verbraucher | coffey
Year: 2015
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978-92-79-45907-8 | 2443 - 5228 | DS-AU-15-001-EN-N
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationmarriageEUfamily lawcourtchildlawlegal usage
Subject: European Community law in generalFamily lawAdministrative procedures
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
« Previous
Next »
Copyright (C) 2003-2019 European Documentation Centres / Update: 09.10.2019