Suche nach Schlagworten '00003451'
40 entries found on 2 pages. starting on record 21 ending on 40Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),
Title: The impact of the Racial Equality Directive: a survey of trade unions and employers in the Member States of the European Union - United Kingdom |
---|
Author: Davis, Mary | Jefferys, Steve | Kahveci, Erol |
Contributer: Fundamental Rights Agency |
Year: unknown |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: ECequality of treatmentGreat Britaindirective |
Subject: Human rights |
Countries Scheme: United Kingdom |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: http//fra.europa.eu |
Title: European Language Learning Materials Survey - UK national report |
---|
Author: Sewell, Cherry |
Contributer: European Commission / Directorate General for Education and Culture | CILT / Chartered Institute of Logistics and Transport (UK) |
Year: 2000 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: foreign languageGreat Britainteaching materials |
Subject: Teaching methods and programmes |
Countries Scheme: United Kingdom |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://www.ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: The United Kingdom - background material for the comparative report on Access to justice in Europe |
---|
Author (Corp. Body): Fundamental Rights Agency |
Year: 2011 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: bilateral relationsEUGreat Britainlegal usage |
Subject: Law. Jurisprudence. Legal systems |
Countries Scheme: United Kingdom |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: http//fra.europa.eu |
Title: Follow-up of the Action Plan on language learning and linguistic diversity - National Report Template: Country England |
---|
Author (Corp. Body): European Commission / Directorate General for Education and Culture |
Year: 2006 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: foreign languageGreat Britainlife-long learninglanguage lessons |
Subject: Education and training |
Countries Scheme: United Kingdom |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://www.ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Legal Study on Homophobia and Discrimination on Grounds of Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity - Thematic Study United Kingdom |
---|
Author: Harris, David | Murphy,Therese | Kenner, Jeffrey | Johnson, Toni |
Contributer: Fundamental Rights Agency |
Year: 2010 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: discriminationGreat Britainhomosexualitytranssexualism |
Subject: Society and social groups |
Countries Scheme: United Kingdom |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: http//fra.europa.eu |
Title: Country fact sheet - UK |
---|
Author (Corp. Body): Fundamental Rights Agency |
Year: 2010 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: asylum procedureGreat Britainright of informationlegal assistance |
Subject: Peace. Wars. Terrorism |
Countries Scheme: United Kingdom |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://www.ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Migrants, minorities and employment in United Kingdom -exclusion, discrimination and anti-discrimination |
---|
Title (other): RAXEN 3 Report to the European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia (EUMC) |
Author (Corp. Body): European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia, Wien | Großbritannien / Commission for Racial Equality |
Year: 2002 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: employmentdiscriminationGreat Britainmigrantminority |
Subject: Society and social groups |
Countries Scheme: United Kingdom |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document Quelle / Source: http://fra.europa.eu/ |
Title: Final report of an audit carried out in the United Kingdom from 08 to 19 April 2013 in order to evaluate the follow-up action taken by the competent authorities with regard to official controls related to the safety of food of animal origin, in particular milk and dairy products |
---|
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Gesundheit und Verbraucher |
Year: 2013 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: DG(SANCO) 2013-6872 - MR FINAL | Ares(2013)3029843 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Länderinformationen | Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: Food inspectionDairy productreportGreat Britaincontrol |
Subject: Animal productsFood and nutrition |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Experience of discrimination, social marginalisation and violence: A comparative study of Muslim and non-Muslim youth in three EU Member States |
---|
Author (Corp. Body): Agency for Fundamental Rights, Wien |
Year: 2010 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: discriminationexclusionFranceGreat BritainyouthMuslimSpain |
Subject: Society and social groupsSocial environment. Social behaviour |
Countries Scheme: SpainFranceUnited Kingdom |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Quelle / Source: http://fra.europa.eu/en | Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document |
Title: European Survey on Language Competences: England Initial Findings Report |
---|
Author (Corp. Body): National Foundation for Educational Research |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Bildung und Kultur |
Year: 2012 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: foreign languageGreat Britainsecondary education lower levelsecondary education upper level |
Subject: Teaching methods and programmes |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Quelle / Source: http://ec.europa.eu | Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document |
Title: Country report Non-discrimination : United Kingdom 2015 ; Including summaries in English, French and German |
---|
Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RÉSUMÉ ZUSAMMENFASSUNG INTRODUCTION 1 GENERAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK 2 THE DEFINITION OF DISCRIMINATION ... 3 PERSONAL AND MATERIAL SCOPE ... 4 EXCEPTIONS ... 5 POSITIVE ACTION (Article 5 Directive 2000/43, Article 7 Directive 2000/78) ... 6 REMEDIES AND ENFORCEMENT ... 7 BODIES FOR THE PROMOTION OF EQUAL TREATMENT (Article 13 Directive 2000/43) 8 IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES ... 9 COORDINATION AT NATIONAL LEVEL 10 CURRENT BEST PRACTICES 11 SENSITIVE OR CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES 12 LATEST DEVELOPMENTS ANNEX 1: TABLE OF KEY NATIONAL ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LEGISLATION ANNEX 2: TABLE OF INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS |
Author: McColgan, Aileen ; 171134397 |
Contributer: European Network of Legal Experts in Gender Equality and Non Discrimination, Utrecht | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Verbraucher |
Publisher: Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen, Luxemburg |
Year: 2015 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978-92-79-53380-8 | DS-02-15-942-3A-N |
Language: en | de | fr |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: old personequal rights lawlaborhandicapemploymentequal opportunitydiscriminationethnic origin EUGreat BritainhomosexualityIslamminorityMuslimracelegal usagereligious communitysexuality |
Subject: European Community law in generalEqual opportunitiesRacial policyReligionsEmployment and unemployment |
Countries Scheme: United Kingdom |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Opinion 8/2007 on the level of protection of personal data in Jersey |
---|
Author (Corp. Body): Article Data Protection Working Party |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz, Freiheit und Sicherheit |
Year: 2007 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 02072/07/EN | WP 141 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: data exchangedata protectiondata processingEUGreat Britainprivacy |
Subject: European Community law in generalLaw of personsInformation transfer |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesUnited Kingdom |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Opinion 5/2003 on the level of protection of personal data in Guernsey |
---|
Author (Corp. Body): Article Data Protection Working Party |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Binnenmarkt |
Year: 2003 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 10595/03/EN | WP 79 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Sonstige Volltexte und Quellen |
Keyword: data exchangedata protectiondata processingEUGreat Britainprivacy |
Subject: European Community law in generalLaw of personsInformation transfer |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesUnited Kingdom |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Opinion 6/2003 on the level of protection of personal data in the Isle of Man |
---|
Author (Corp. Body): Article Data Protection Working Party |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Binnenmarkt |
Year: 2003 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 11580/03/EN | WP 82 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Sonstige Volltexte und Quellen |
Keyword: data exchangedata protectiondata processingEUGreat Britainprivacy |
Subject: European Community law in generalLaw of personsInformation transfer |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesUnited Kingdom |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Study on paving the way for future policy initiatives in the field of fight against organised crime: the effectiveness of specific criminal law measures targeting organised crime : Final report |
---|
Abstract Organised crime poses a threat to the security and freedom of European citizens and impacts the lives of people worldwide. Recognising the severity of the problem and the need for coordinated action, the EU has initiated a number of measures to encourage closer cooperation between Member States and the adoption of common legal, judicial and investigative frameworks to address organised crime. [Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents PREFACE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS PART 1: INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND 1. INTRODUCTION TO THE STUDY 2.BACKGROUND TO THE STUDY EUROPEAN AND INTERNATIONAL LEGAL FRAMEWORKS IN THE FIGHT AGAINST ORGANISED CRIME 2.1. ... 3. METHODOLOGY 3.1. ... PART 2: NATIONAL CRIMINAL LAW TOOLS USED IN THE FIGHT AGAINST ORGANISED CRIME 4. MAPPING AND TRANSPOSITION ASSESSMENT OF MS LEGISLATION WITH REFERENCE TO FRAMEWORK DECISION 2008/841/JHA 4.1. ... 5. FURTHER/ALTERNATIVE CRIMINAL LAW TOOLS TO FIGHT ORGANISED CRIME 5.1. ... 6. IMPLEMENTATION OF LAWS RELATING TO PARTICIPATION IN A CRIMINAL ORGANISATION 6.1. ... PART 3: LEGAL AND INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS 7. LEGAL AND INVESTIGATIVE TOOLS 7.1. ... PART 4: NATIONAL SPECIALISED JUDICIAL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES INVOLVED IN THE FIGHT AGAINST ORGANISED CRIME 8. AN OVERVIEW OF NATIONAL SPECIALISED JUDICIAL AND LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES, PROMISING PRACTICES AND CHALLENGES 8.1. ... PART 5: CASE STUDIES 9. THE ITALIAN CASE STUDY 9.1. ... 10. UK CASE STUDY 10.1. ... PART 6: CONCLUSIONS 11. CONCLUSIONS 11.1. ... REFERENCES APPENDIX A: LEGAL SOURCES APPENDIX B: MAIN NATIONAL SPECIALIST AGENCIES OPERATING IN THE FIELD OF ORGANISED CRIME APPENDIX C: INTERVIEWEES FOR UK CASE STUDY |
Author: Di Nicola, Andrea ; 106687574X | Gunev, Filip ; 1057018023 | Levi, Michael ; 171516753 |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Migration und Inneres | Rand Europe, Cambridge | ecrime group | Centre for the Study of Democracy |
Publisher: Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen, Luxemburg |
Year: 2015 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978-92-79-44630-6 | HR-06-14-242-EN-N |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: evaluationEUcase studylaw enforcementlegislationGreat BritainItalyorganizations organized crimelegal usage |
Subject: European Community treaties and agreementsCriminal law. Penal sanctions. Penal institutions |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesItalyUnited Kingdom |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Evaluation conjointe de la coopération de lAllemagne, de la Belgique, de la Commission européenne, de la France, des Pays-Bas, du Royaume-Uni et de la Suède avec le Burundi : Volume 1 ; Rapport |
---|
Title (other): Evaluation conjointe de la coopération de lAllemagne, de la Belgique, de la Commission européenne, de la France, des Pays-Bas, du Royaume-Uni et de la Suède avec le Burundi : Volume 2 ; Annexes 1 à 10 | Evaluation conjointe de la coopération de lAllemagne, de la Belgique, de la Commission européenne, de la France, des Pays-Bas, du Royaume-Uni et de la Suède avec le Burundi : Volume 3 ; Annexes 11 à 18 | Evaluation conjointe de la coopération de lAllemagne, de la Belgique, de la Commission européenne, de la France, des Pays-Bas, du Royaume-Uni et de la Suède avec le Burundi : Résumé | Joint evaluation of the cooperation with Burundi of Belgium, the European Commission, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom : Executive summary |
Abstract LAllemagne, la Belgique, la Commission Européenne, la France, les Pays-Bas, le Royaume-Uni et la Suède se sont associés pour mener une évaluation conjointe de leur coopération avec le Burundi sur la période 2005-2011. Lévaluation conjointe analyse les résultats d'efforts conjugués ainsi que leur impact commun sur le développement du pays.Sur la période 2005-2011, le volume daide mobilisée au Burundi a été de 2 944 millions USD. LUnion Européenne y a contribué pour 48% dont 843 millions USD pour les États membres et 578 millions USD pour la CE. Pour illustrer la contribution des sept Donneurs Parties à lEvaluation (DPE) à la consolidation de la paix et au développement du pays, lévaluation se concentre sur quatre secteurs : développement agricole, éducation, gouvernance démocratique (police, sécurité, justice, médias) et appui macro-économique.Lévaluation porte sur un champ temporel (2005-2011) et sur une palette dinterventions extrêmement larges. La méthodologie choisie consiste en une analyse de contribution : il sagit didentifier pas à pas la contribution dune sélection dinterventions à la construction de la paix, à la légitimité et à lefficacité des institutions et, à la croissance économique inclusive.[Author vode copyright] |
Table of Contents RÉSUMÉ 1. INTRODUCTION : MANDAT ET MÉTHODOLOGIE 1.1. Objet de lévaluation 1.2. Structure générale de la démarche 1.3. Apprécier lefficacité des stratégies sectorielles: une analyse de contribution 1.4. Difficultés rencontrées dans la conduite de lévaluation 1.5. Forces et limites de la méthodologie adoptée 2. LE CONTEXTE BURUNDAIS 2.1. Analyse SWOT 2.2. Les atouts et forces du pays 2.3. Les faiblesses qui handicapent le développement pacifique du Burundi 2.4. Les risques pour le futur du Burundi 2.5. Éléments ambivalents : à la fois atouts et facteurs de risque 2.6. Les potentialités 2.7. Des atouts aujourdhui, mais dont le potentiel doit être valorisé davantage 3. PERTINENCE (QE1) 3.1. Qualité de lanalyse et suivi du contexte politique, économique, culturel, social et des conflits au Burundi et dans la région 3.2. Traduction des analyses du conflit dans les stratégies bilatérales 3.3. Quels outils pour agir vite et rester engagé dans le pays ? 4. EFFICACITÉ SÉCURITÉ (QE2) 4.1. Portée de la question dévaluation 4.2. Analyse de contribution 5. EFFICACITÉ GOUVERNANCE (QE3) 5.1. Portée de la question dévaluation 5.2. Analyse de contribution 6. EFFICACITÉ AGRICULTURE VIVRIÈRE (QE4) 6.1. Portée de la question dévaluation 6.1. Analyse de contribution 7. EFFICACITÉ CULTURES DEXPORTATION (QE5) 7.1. Portée de la question dévaluation 7.2. Analyse de contribution 8. EFFICACITÉ ÉDUCATION (QE6) 8.1. Portée de la question dévaluation 8.2. Analyse de contribution 8.2.1. Réalisations des DPE 9. EFFICACITÉ APPUIS MACRO-ÉCONOMIQUES (QE7) 9.1. Portée de la question dévaluation 9.2. Analyse de contribution 10. COORDINATION (QE8) 10.1. Implication des DPE dans les cercles de coordination 10.2. Quelle division du travail entre DPE? 10.3. Une harmonisation des procédures peu avancée | 11. CONCLUSIONS 11.1. Conception des interventions des DPE 11.2. Une contribution de laide des DPE inégale selon les secteurs 11.3. Une aide des DPE globalement fournie comme prévu, mais qui na que partiellement induit les changements espérés en termes de stabilité, de renforcement des institutions et de croissance 12. RECOMMANDATIONS 12.1. Clarifier un dialogue politique parfois difficile 12.2. Groupe A: les objectifs partagés entre Gouvernement et DPE 12.3. Groupe B: objectifs partagés mais moins prioritaires pour le gouvernement 12.4. Groupe C: objectifs des DPE partagés avec la société civile mais pas avec le gouvernement 12.5. Modalités à envisager pour consolider la transition 12.6. Compléter le partage sectoriel des tâches entre DPE 12.7. Aux sièges des DPE: assouplir la concentration sectorielle dans les pays ragiles | Volume 2 ANNEXES imprimables ANNEXE 1. TERMES DE RÉFÉRENCE ANNEXE 2. LES STRATÉGIES DES DPE AU BURUNDI ANNEXE 3. PERTINENCE (QE1): ÉLÉMENTS DINFORMATION ANNEXE 4. EFFICACITÉ SÉCURITÉ (QE2): ÉLÉMENTS DINFORMATION ANNEXE 5. EFFICACITÉ GOUVERNANCE (QE3): ÉLÉMENTS DINFORMATION ANNEXE 6. EFFICACITÉ AGRICULTURE VIVRIÈRE (QE4): ÉLÉMENTS DINFORMATION ANNEXE 7. EFFICACITÉ CULTURES DEXPORTATION (QE5): ÉLÉMENTS DINFORMATION ANNEXE 8. EFFICACITÉ ÉDUCATION (QE6): ELÉMENTS DINFORMATION ANNEXE 9. APPUIS MACROÉCONOMIQUES (QE7): ÉLÉMENTS DINFORMATION ANNEXE 10. COORDINATION (QE8): ÉLÉMENTS DINFORMATION Volume 3 ANNEXES électroniques ANNEXE 11. LOGIQUE DES STRATÉGIES DU BURUNDI ET DES DPE ANNEXE 12. GRILLE DÉVALUATION DÉTAILLÉE ANNEXE 13. EFFICACITÉ SÉCURITÉ (QE2): DONNÉES COLLECTÉES ANNEXE 14. EFFICACITÉ GOUVERNANCE (QE3): DONNÉES COLLECTÉES ANNEXE 15. EFFICACITÉ AGRICULTURE VIVRIÈRE (QE4) & CULTURES DEXPORTATION (QE5): DONNÉES COLLECTÉES ANNEXE 16. EFFICACITÉ ÉDUCATION (QE6): DONNÉES COLLECTÉES ANNEXE 17. LISTE DES PERSONNES RENCONTRÉES LORS DE LA MISSION DE TERRAIN ANNEXE 18. COMPTE-RENDU DU SÉMINAIRE DE PRÉSENTATION DU RAPPORT FINAL PROVISOIRE (BUJUMBURA, 11 DÉCEMBRE 2013) |
Author (Corp. Body): SEE sarl |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Eure?val, Lyon | SIPU international | GFA Consulting Group |
Year: 2014 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contrat EVA 2011 274 858 |
Language: en | fr |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: BelgiumevaluationeducationBurundiGermanydevelopment aidEUFrance Great BritaincooperationagriculturemacroeconomicsNetherlandsSwedenadministration |
Subject: International cooperationEuropean Community external relations |
Countries Scheme: Germany. General ResourcesEurope. General ResourcesSwedenBelgiumFrance, EuropeUnited Kingdom NetherlandsBurundi |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Study on the development of statistical data on the European security technological and industrial base : Security Sector Survey Analysis: United Kingdom |
---|
Abstract This Background Report has been produced as part of the study on Development of statistical data on the European security technological and industrial base commissioned by the European Commission within the Framework Contract on Security (ENTR/09/050) between the European Commission and a consortium led by Ecorys Nederland B.V. in collaboration with TNO and DECISION.The Background Report provides an overview of initial findings from a survey of companies active in the (civil) security sector in Germany. It is one of a series of reports covering findings from surveys conducted for: Estonia, France, Italy, Poland, Spain and the United Kingdom. The survey design and subsequent data analysis has been undertaken by Ecorys, while the actual surveying of companies has been conducted by GfK, a specialist market research company. The individual country surveys of companies have been conducted over the period October 2014 to February 2015.To obtain comparable data for Germany, Ecorys has collaborated with the Brandenburg Institute for Society and Security (BIGS) who have conducted a similar survey in 2012 based on a common survey questionnaire design. This survey has been implemented as a follow-up round to previous surveys of companiesactive in the (civil) security sector in Germany undertaken by BIGS.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents Preface 1 Introduction 1.1 General Context 1.2 Aim of this report 1.3 Structure of the report 2 Survey overview 2.1 Survey implementation 2.2 Survey population 2.3 Coverage and response rate 2.4 Survey instrument and method 2.5 Field report 2.5.1 Field time 2.5.2 Length of interviews 2.6 Data preparation and testing 3 Descriptive analysis 3.1 Security threat categories 3.2 Areas of economic activity 3.3 Broad categories of security products and services 3.4 Cyber security 3.4.1 Cyber security products and services 3.4.2 Cyber/IT business activities 3.5 Other security product providers 3.5.1 Other security products 3.5.2 Other security products business activities 3.6 Other security service providers 3.6.1 Other security services 3.7 Security market by economic sector (end-user) 3.7.1 Overall all products and services 3.7.2 Breakdown by main broad category of security products and services 3.8 Security market by geographical region 3.8.1 Geographical markets all products and services 3.8.2 Breakdown by main broad category of security products and services 3.9 Firm structure: employment and turnover 3.9.1 Employment 3.9.2 Turnover 3.10 Growth performance and prospects 3.10.1 Past turnover growth performance 3.10.2 Future turnover growth prospects 3.10.3 Future demand prospects by broad customer group and geographical area 3.11 Competitors 3.11.1 Geographical origin of main competitors all products and services 3.11.2 Breakdown by main broad category of security products and services 3.11.3 Future competition prospects by geographical origin of main competitors | 4 Aggregate estimates of the size of the security industry 4.1 Overview of approach 4.2 Method for the estimation of turnover and employment for the survey sample 4.2.1 Underlying assumptions 4.2.2 Estimation of turnover for non-declaring respondents 4.2.3 Estimation of employment levels for employment - size class 1000 or more employees 4.2.4 Estimation of sample average values of employment and turnover per firm 4.3 Method for the initial estimation of aggregate turnover and employment 4.3.1 Underlying assumptions 4.3.2 Calculation of the initial estimate of the population of security companies 4.3.3 Calculation of initial estimates of aggregate (national) turnover and employment 4.4 Variants and sub-groups 4.4.1 Adjustment for possible defence-related turnover and employment (variant) 4.4.2 Estimation of turnover and employment by main broad industry category (sub-groups) 4.5 Size of the security industry: survey estimates and aggregate (national) extrapolation 4.5.1 Estimates of the population of security companies 4.5.2 Comparison of estimators Annexes A.1. Product and services segmentation A.2. Market Segmentation |
Author (Corp. Body): Ecorys |
Contributer: TNO | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Migration und Inneres | DECISION |
Year: 2015 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: data securityserviceEUfire brigadeGreat Britaininternetpolicesecurity security policyespionagestatisticsenterprise |
Subject: European Community law in general |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesUnited Kingdom |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Study on the development of statistical data on the European security technological and industrial base : Final Report |
---|
Abstract In light of the challenges and needs, this study was launched with the overall aim to contribute to the development of statistical data that provide a clear picture of the technological and industrial base of the security industry in the EU. At the same time, the study has also served to contribute to the development of statistical data on the security services sector.The study was divided into two phases:The Definition Phase which covered preparatory activities,included the formulation of a definition and delineation of the security sector. Based on this work, an inventory was made of various options available for collection and quantification of the security sector, together with an assessment of the feasibility of implementing these options. Based on this assessment, which was validated in a workshop and confirmed by the European Commission, the approach to adopted for the development of statistical data was selected;The Implementation Phase which covered the implementation of the quantification exercise. This exercise consisted of a combination of a the analysis of existing statistical data and a company survey conducted in seven Member States (DE, EE, ES, FR, IT, PL, UK), with the purpose ofincreasingthe understanding of the structure and conduct of the security sector in the EU. The results were extrapolated to arrive at an assessment of the size, structure and performance of the overall EU security industry sector and market.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Background Methodology and approach Findings from publicly available statistical data Findings from the Security Sector Survey Estimation of the overall size of the EU security industry 1 Introduction 1.1 General Context 1.2 Aim of this study 1.3 Methodology 1.3.1 Definition Phase 1.3.2 Implementation Phase 1.4 Structure of the report 2 Delineation and segmentation of the security sector 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Delineation and segmentation of the sector 2.2.1 Security definitions 2.2.2 Conceptual segmentation and delineation 2.2.3 Security threats and risks 2.2.4 Security risk and threat domains 2.2.5 Security actors 2.2.6 Security response cycle 2.2.7 Security tools (products & services) 3 Overview of data available in statistics 3.1 Private security services sector 3.1.1 Company structure 3.1.2 Number of companies 3.1.3 Employment 3.1.4 Turnover 3.2 Public security services sector 3.2.1 Police forces 3.2.2 Firefighters 3.3 EU overview 4 Comparative analysis of survey results 4.1 Survey - introduction 4.2 Comparative analysis 4.2.1 Security threat categories 4.2.2 Industry segmentation 4.2.3 Security market segmentation 4.2.4 Firm structure and size 4.2.5 Turnover growth 4.2.6 Competition | 5 Estimation of national aggregate employment and turnover and extrapolation to EU level 5.1 Methodology for estimation of national level aggregate turnover and employment 5.1.1 Basic approach 5.1.2 Other underlying assumptions 5.1.3 Sub-groups and variants 5.2 Comparison of survey-based employment and turnover estimates 5.2.1 Employment(average number of employees per firm) 5.2.2 Turnover (average turnover per firm) 5.2.3 Turnover per employee 5.3 Estimates of aggregate national employment and turnover 5.3.1 Aggregate national employment and turnover (all security) 5.3.2 Aggregate national employment and turnover by broad industry category 5.4 Estimated total size of the EU security industry 6 Estimation of the breakdown of turnover and employment by products and services, business activities and markets 6.1 Methodologies for estimation of the breakdown of turnover and employment 6.1.1 Estimation of the breakdown of turnover and employment by product and service type 6.1.2 Estimation of the breakdown of turnover and employment by business activity 6.1.3 Estimation of the breakdown of turnover and employment by market segment 6.2 Estimates of the breakdown of turnover and employment by security products and services, business activities and markets 6.2.1 Other security products 6.2.2 Other security services 6.2.3 Cyber security services and products Annex I: Comparative Tables Annex II: Ecorys Survey on the Structure of the Security Industry (Ecorys SSS) - questionnaire |
Author (Corp. Body): Ecorys |
Contributer: TNO | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Migration und Inneres | DECISION |
Year: 2015 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: data securityserviceEUfire brigadeGreat Britaininternetpolicesecurity security policyespionagestatisticsenterprise |
Subject: European Community law in general |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Study on the feasibility of processing asylum claims outside the EU against the background of the Common European Asylum System and the goal of a Common Asylum Procedure : Final report |
---|
Abstract With the development towards comprehensive and more sophisticated border control regimes, the problem of protection seekers access to EU territory has increasingly come into focus. Disorderly movement is presently the main avenue to safety in the EU, and human smugglers act as important facilitators. Single European states have sought ways out of this dilemma, and pioneered techniques of externalised processing. One of them is the operation of Protected Entry Procedures from the platform of diplomatic representations, allowing a non-national-to approach the potential host state outside its territory with a claim for asylum or other form of international protection, and-to be granted an entry permit in case of a positive response to that claim, be it preliminary or final.Provided they are well-crafted, Protected Entry Procedures could drain parts of the market for human smuggling, attract bona fide refugees who presently opt for the smuggling services and thereby decrease the total number of disorderly arrivals and partially eliminate the problem of returning the rejected caseload. An obvious security advantage for states is to know in advance who wishes to enter their territory. In addition, important synergies with integration and labour immigration policies can be created.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 Background 1.2 Objective of the Study 1.3 Methodology 1.4 Defining Protected Entry Procedures and Related Concepts 1.5 Convergence Areas between Protected Entry Procedures and Other Protection Regimes 2 Processing Asylum Claims Outside the EU: Historical Precedents and Current Debates 2.1 Protection and Evacuation by Embassies during the Holocaust 2.2 Post-War Practices and Debates ... 3 The Legal Dimensions of Protected Entry Procedures 3.1 The Relevance of International, Supranational and Domestic Law 3.2 The Applicability of Protective Norms of International Law ... 3.3 Protected Entry Procedures and the Law of the European Union 4 Modelling Protected Entry Procedures 4.1 Protected Entry Procedures and its Relation to Other Systems of Refugee Protection ... 4.2 Unilateral Approaches or Multilateral Cooperation? 4.3 Inclusiveness and Formalisation 4.4 Filter Elements in Protected Entry Procedures ... 5 Benefits and Drawbacks of Protected Entry Procedures 5.1 Enhanced Control and the Gradual Drainage of the Smuggling Market 5.2 Will Numbers Increase, Decrease or Remain Unaffected? 5.3 Trade-Offs in the Area of Beneficiaries Substantive and Procedural Rights ... 5.4 Reception During Procedures and the Rejected Caseload 5.5 Risk and Cost Redistribution 5.6 Potential Synergies with Integration Policies 5.7 Potential Synergies with Labour Immigration Policies 5.8 The Added Value of the EU in Crafting External Processing Regimes 6 Current Systems for Processing Asylum Claims Outside the EU and Selected Host States 6.1 Practice in States Operating Formal Protected Entry Procedures ... | 6.2 Practice in States Not Operating a Formal Protected Entry Procedure ... 6.3 Practice in Three Non-EU Resettlement Countries ... 7 The Development Potential of External Processing in Europe 7.1 Comparative Overview and Critical Analysis of Existing Solutions... ... 7.2Future Scenarios for Processing Asylum Claims Outside the EU ... 8 Conclusions Table of Cases Bibliography |
Author: Noll, Gregor ; 1139136186 | Fagerlund, Jessica | Liebaut, Fabrice |
Contributer: The Danish Centre for Human rights |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz, Freiheit und Sicherheit |
Year: 2002 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: policy on asylumright of asylumAustraliaDenmarkEUFranceGreat Britaininternational law Canadaslave trademigrationNetherlandsAustriaprotectionismlawSwitzerlandSpainUnited States of America |
Subject: European Community external relationsEuropean Community treaties and agreementsHuman rightsMigration |
Countries Scheme: Austria. General ResourcesSwitzerland. General ResourcesEurope. General ResourcesDenmark SpainFranceUnited KingdomNetherlandsCanadaUSAAustralia |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Study on measuring consumer detriment in the European Union : Final report ; Part 1 Main report |
---|
Title (other): Study on measuring consumer detriment in the European Union : Executive Summary | Operational guidance document on measuring personal consumer detriment : Developed as part of the Study on measuring consumer detriment in the European Union |
Abstract This study developed a methodology to assess revealed personal consumer detriment that robustly measures and quantifies the incidence and magnitude of detriment at EU and national level, taking into account both pre- and post-redress financial detriment and non-financial detriment such as time loss and psychological detriment. It can be applied consistently across a broad array of markets as well as adapted to specific markets. An operational guidance document was developed to guide practitioners based on the work undertaken in this study. The methodology builds on previous studies in different countries and markets. Consumer surveys constitute the main data collection tool. The methodology was applied in six markets (mobile telephone services; clothing, footwear and bags; train services; large household appliances; electricity services; and loans, credit and credit cards) and four countries (France, Italy, Poland and the UK). Results were extrapolated to the EU28. The results show that, across the six markets covered, consumers suffered total pre-redress financial detriment of between EUR 15.4 billion and EUR 47.9 billion, post-redress financial detriment of between EUR 9.6 billion and EUR 33.3 billion and monetised time loss of between EUR 10.7 billion and EUR 25.0 billion over the last 12 months in the EU28.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 2. OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE 2.1. Objectives 2.2. Study questions 2.3. Geographical scope and coverage 2.4. Time period 2.5. Thematic coverage and main tasks 2.6. Methodological tools applied 2.7. Main study phases 3. DEFINITION OF PERSONAL CONSUMER DETRIMENT 3.1. Background 3.2. Refinement of the definition 4. DEVELOPMENT OF THE APPROACH TO MEASURE PERSONAL CONSUMER DETRIMENT 4.1. Rationale for the survey-based approach 4.2. Markets subject to assessment 4.3. Countries subject to assessment 4.4. Key concepts concerning survey-based measurement of personal consumer detriment 4.5. Dimensions of consumer detriment 4.6. Development of the draft consumer survey questionnaire 4.7. Cognitive interviews 4.8. Pilot consumer survey 4.9. Final approach to measuring personal consumer detriment and extrapolating results 5. DEVELOPMENT OF THE APPROACH TO TRIANGULATION OF CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS 5.1. Rationale for triangulation and related triangulation tools 5.2. Development of the survey of complaint handling bodies 5.3. Development of the mystery shopping exercise 5.4. Final approach to triangulation of results on consumer detriment 6. ASSESSMENT OF PERSONAL CONSUMER DETRIMENT IN SIX MARKETS 6.1. Implementation of the main consumer surveys 6.2. Incidence of personal consumer detriment overall and by country 6.3. Magnitude of personal consumer detriment overall and by country 6.4. Personal consumer detriment by socio-demographic group and factor/driver of consumer vulnerability 6.5. Magnitude of personal consumer detriment comparing purchases over the internet vs other sales channels and cross-border vs. domestic purchases 6.6. Estimation of magnitude of personal consumer detriment using the fair price approach 6.7. Comparison of incidence and magnitude of financial detriment across modes 6.8. Contextual information and description of problems experienced by respondents | 7. TRIANGULATION OF CONSUMER SURVEY RESULTS 7.1. Triangulation based on data from the European Commission harmonised complaints database and the survey of complaint handling bodies 7.2. Triangulation based on mystery shopping data 7.3. Conclusions of the triangulation 8. EXTRAPOLATION OF FINANCIAL DETRIMENT AND TIME LOSS DETRIMENT TO COUNTRY AND EU LEVEL 8.1. Country-level extrapolation 8.2. Extrapolation to EU28 9. OVERALL CONCLUSIONS OF THE STUDY 9.1. Conclusions on the development of the methodology 9.2. Conclusions on the application of the methodology 9.3. Recommendations on collection and analysis of data as well as consumer analysis at EU level | 0. Introduction and overview 0.1. Aim of this guidance 0.2. Definition of personal consumer detriment 0.3. Key concepts concerning the measurement of personal consumer detriment 0.4. Overview of steps to apply the methodology Step 1 - Definition of the scope of the data collection 1.1. Define the geographical scope of the assessment 1.2. Select the market(s) for assessment 1.3. Determine the required sample size and survey mode 1.4. Determine the additional data collection tool(s) to be used for triangulation of the results of the consumer survey, if necessary 1.5. Consider the need for additional data collection tool(s) for the assessment among specific vulnerable consumer groups or in very low penetration markets Step 2 - Consumer survey questionnaire 2.1. Screener questions 2.2. Market module questions 2.3. Questions on socio-demographics and consumer expectations Step 3 - Assessment of detriment, triangulation and extrapolation 3.1. Measure the incidence of detriment 3.2. Measure the magnitude of detriment 3.3. Context to the detriment measured 3.4. Triangulate results of consumer survey with other data sources, if relevant 3.5. Extrapolate results to country or for the entire EU, if relevant |
Author (Corp. Body): Civic Consulting |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Verbraucher | TNS Opinion | European Commission / Consumers, Health, Agriculture and Food Executive Agenc |
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Veröffentlichungen |
Year: 2017 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978-92-9200-747-8 | EB-02-17-004-EN-N | 978-92-9200-745-4 | EB-02-17-003-EN-N | 978-92-9200-744-7 | EB-02-17-002-EN-N |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: loanservicerailroadelectronic commerceelectronic marketEUFranceGreat Britain Italyclothingcredit marketPolandtelephoneconsumer protection |
Subject: European Community law in generalConsumption. Consumer protection |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesPolandItalyFranceUnited Kingdom |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |