Suche nach Schlagworten '00003629'

7 entries found on 1 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 7

Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),

« Previous
Next »
Title: EX ANTE EVALUATION : A PRACTICAL GUIDE FOR PREPARING PROPOSALS FOR EXPENDITURE PROGRAMMES
Title (other): ÉVALUATION EX ANTE : GUIDE PRATIQUE POUR L'ÉLABORATION DE PROPOSITIONS DE PROGRAMMES DE DÉPENSES
Table of Contents
1. INTRODUCTION
2. WHY EX ANTE EVALUATION
2.1 Supporting programme preparation
2.2 Meeting formal requirements
3. WHEN, WHO AND WHAT
3.1 When?
3.2 Who?
3.3 What?
4. HOW TO DO IT?
4.1 Problem analysis and needs assessment
4.2 Objective setting and related indicators
4.3 Alternative delivery mechanisms and risk assessment
4.4 Added value of Community involvement
4.5 Lessons from the past
4.6 Planning future monitoring and evaluation
4.7 Helping to achieve cost-effectiveness
ANNEX 1: CHECK-LIST OF EX ANTE EVALUATION
ANNEX 2: THE COMMISSION COMMUNICATION ON EVALUATION (SEC(2000)1051)
ANNEX 3: EUROPEAN ADDED VALUE (EAV) AND OTHER RELATEDT TERMS
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Haushalt
Year: 2001
Language: en | fr
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationEUbudget document
Subject: European Community budget and financial management
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu.int/)
Title: Meta-study on lessons from existing evaluations as an input to the Review of EU spending : Final Report ; January 2008.
Evaluation for the European Commission. Contract ABAC-101930
Table of Contents
Executive summary
Introduction
Frame, purpose and scope of the study
Methodological approach
Methodological limitations
Structure of this report
1. Synthesis of Evaluators’ assessments
1.1. Assessment per broad policy area
1.1.1. Competitiveness
1.1.2. Cohesion
1.1.3. Natural resources
1.1.4. Citizenship
1.1.5. Global partnership
1.2. Assessment per evaluation criterion
1.2.1. Relevance
1.2.2. Coherence
1.2.3. European added value
1.2.4. Effectiveness
1.2.5. Sustainability
1.2.6. Efficiency
1.2.7. Unintended impacts
2. Lessons learned
2.1. Designing policies that work
2.1.1. Prioritising objectives
2.1.2. Integrating cross-cutting issues
2.1.3. Formulating achievable strategies
2.1.4. Considering the after-policy period from the outset
2.2. Ensuring subsidiarity
2.2.1. Adding trans-national value
2.2.2. Dealing with critical mass
2.2.3. Changing systems
2.2.4. Securing local relevance
2.3. Spending wisely
2.3.1. Targeting participants and beneficiaries
2.3.2. Avoiding deadweight
2.3.3. Leveraging non-budgetary resources
2.3.4. Making use of financial engineering
2.3.5. Sharing the cost with other levels of government
2.4. Seeking results
2.4.1. Dealing with the pressure to spend
2.4.2. Questioning command-and-control approaches
2.4.3. Managing flexibility
2.4.4. Considering performance incentives
2.4.5. Learning from achievements
3. Challenges, solutions and knowledge transfer
3.1. Inducing structural changes
3.2. Targeting beneficiaries accurately
3.3. Decentralising whilst managing associated risks
3.4. Focusing on results rather than absorption
3.5. Promoting and monitoring leverage
Using this report
Appendix A – Database of available reports
A1 - Identifying the reports
A2 – Structure of the set of reports
A3 – Impartiality of the available reports
A4 - Assessing the potential interest of th
Author (Corp. Body): Euréval Centre for European Evaluation Expertise
Contributer: Ramboll Management | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Haushalt
Year: 2008
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationEUpromotional programbudget documentbudgetary policy
Subject: European Community institutionsEuropean Community financial managementEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIB
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Meta-study on lessons from existing evaluations as an input to the Review of EU spending. Final Report. January 2008.
Evaluation for the European Commission. Contract ABAC-101930
Table of Contents
Executive summary
Introduction
Frame, purpose and scope of the study
Methodological approach 1.1. Assessment per broad policy area
1.1.1. Competitiveness
1.1.2. Cohesion
1.1.3. Natural resources
1.1.4. Citizenship
1.1.5. Global partnership
1.2. Assessment per evaluation criterion
1.2.1. Relevance
1.2.2. Coherence
1.2.3. European added value
1.2.4. Effectiveness
1.2.5. Sustainability
1.2.6. Efficiency
1.2.7. Unintended impacts
2. Lessons learned
2.1. Designing policies that work
2.1.1. Prioritising objectives
2.1.2. Integrating cross-cutting issues
2.1.3. Formulating achievable strategies
2.1.4. Considering the after-policy period from the outset
2.2. Ensuring subsidiarity
2.2.1. Adding trans-national value
2.2.2. Dealing with critical mass
2.2.3. Changing systems
2.2.4. Securing local relevance
2.3. Spending wisely
2.3.1. Targeting participants and beneficiaries
2.3.2. Avoiding deadweight
2.3.3. Leveraging non-budgetary resources
2.3.4. Making use of financial engineering
2.3.5. Sharing the cost with other levels of government
2.4. Seeking results
2.4.1. Dealing with the pressure to spend
2.4.2. Questioning command-and-control approaches
2.4.3. Managing flexibility
2.4.4. Considering performance incentives
2.4.5. Learning from achievements
3. Challenges, solutions and knowledge transfer
3.1. Inducing structural changes
3.2. Targeting beneficiaries accurately
3.3. Decentralising whilst managing associated risks
3.4. Focusing on results rather than absorption
3.5. Promoting and monitoring leverage
Using this report
Appendix A – Database of available reports
A1 - Identifying the reports
A2 - Structure of the set of reports
A3 – Impartiality of the available reports
A4 - Assessing the potential interest of th
Author (Corp. Body): Euréval Centre for European Evaluation Expertise
Contributer: Ramboll Management | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Haushalt
Year: 2008
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationEUpromotional programbudget documentbudgetary policy
Subject: European Community institutionsEuropean Community financial managementEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIB
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Haushaltsordnung und Durchführungsbestimmungen für den Gesamthaushalt der Europäischen Gemeinschaften : Synoptische
Darstellung ; Vervollständigt durch eine Auswahl an Rechtstexten zur Aufstellung und Ausführung des Gesamthaushalts
Table of Contents
VORWORT
1 HAUSHALTSORDNUNG UND DURCHFÜHRUNGSBESTIMMUNGEN
1.1 Referenzdokumente
1.2 Inkrafttreten und Anwendung
1.3 Synoptische Darstellung
ERSTER TEIL: GEMEINSAME BESTIMMUNGEN
TITEL I: GEGENSTAND
TITEL II: HAUSHALTSGRUNDSÄTZE
KAPITEL 1: Grundsätze der Einheit und der Haushaltswahrheit
KAPITEL 2: Grundsatz der Jährlichkeit
KAPITEL 3: Grundsatz des Haushaltsausgleichs
KAPITEL 4: Grundsatz der Rechnungseinheit
KAPITEL 5: Grundsatz der Gesamtdeckung
KAPITEL 6: Grundsatz der Spezialität
KAPITEL 7: Grundsatz der Wirtschaftlichkeit der Haushaltsführung
KAPITEL 8: Grundsatz der Transparenz
TITEL III: AUFSTELLUNG UND GLIEDERUNG DES HAUSHALTSPLANS
KAPITEL 1 : Aufstellung des Haushaltsplans
KAPITEL 2: Gliederung und Darstellung des Haushaltsplans
TITEL IV: HAUSHALTSVOLLZUG
KAPITEL 1: Allgemeine Bestimmungen
KAPITEL 2: Arten des Haushaltsvollzugs
KAPITEL 3: Finanzakteure
Abschnitt 1: Grundsatz der Aufgabentrennung
Abschnitt 2: Der Anweisungsbefugte
Abschnitt 3: Der Rechnungsführer
Abschnitt 4: Der Zahlstellenverwalter Abschnitt 1: Allgemeine Vorschriften
Abschnitt 2: Auf die bevollmächtigten und nachgeordnet bevollmächtigten Anweisungsbefugten anwendbare Vorschriften
Abschnitt 3: Auf die Rechnungsführer und Zahlstellenverwalter anwendbare Vorschriften
KAPITEL 5: Einnahmenvorgänge
Abschnitt 1: Bereitstellung der Eigenmittel
Abschnitt 2: Forderungsvorausschätzungen
Abschnitt 3: Feststellung der Forderungen
Abschnitt 4: Anordnung der Einziehungen
Abschnitt 5: Einziehung
KAPITEL 6: Ausgabenvorgänge
Abschnitt 1: Mittelbindung
Abschnitt 2: Feststellung der Ausgaben
Abschnitt 3: Anordnung der Ausgaben
Abschnitt 4: Zahlungen
Abschnitt 5: Fristen für die Ausgabenvorgänge
KAPITEL 7: Datenverarbeitungssysteme
KAPITEL 8: Der Interne Prüfer
TITEL V: ÖFFENTLICHE AUFTRAGSVERGABE
KAPITEL 1: Allgemeine Bestimmun
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission
Publisher: Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen
Year: 2008
Language: de
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EUbudget documentbudgetary policy
Subject: European Community financial managementEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIB
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Information note on multidonor trust funds supported by the European Union : Budget since 2003
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Internationale Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung, Brüssel
Year: 2015
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: development aidEUEuropean Commissionfundingbudget document
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Global ResourcesEurope. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Study on Legal Instruments and Lessons Learned from the Evaluations Managed by the Joint Evaluation Unit : Final Report
; Volume 1: Final Summary Report
Title (other): Study on Legal Instruments and Lessons Learned from the Evaluations Managed by the Joint Evaluation Unit : Final Report
; Volume 2 The Intervention Logics | Study on Legal Instruments and Lessons Learned from the Evaluations Managed by the
Joint Evaluation Unit : Final Report ; Volume 3 The Review of Evaluation Reports
Abstract
The overall purpose of this study was to see what lessons could be learnt from the past experience of EC external action programmes that might be useful in the design and formulation of the EU’s next multi-annual budget. In addition, the study also sought to identify lessons which could improve the design of future evaluations.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Acronyms
Executive summary
1 Introduction
1.1 CONTEXT OF THE STUDY
1.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
2 Conceptual Framework
2.1 ROLE OF REGULATIONS/LEGAL INSTRUMENTS
2.2 ROLE OF IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE INSTRUMENTS
2.3 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEGAL INSTRUMENTS AND RELATED STRATEGIES
2.4 STRATEGIES AS A BASIS FOR EVALUATIONS
3 Methodology
3.1 SCOPE AND FOCUS OF THE STUDY
3.2 METHODOLOGY FOR THE STUDY PHASES
3.2.1 Phase 1 (Inception Report): Preparation of Intervention Logics for Each LegalInstrument
3.2.2 Phase 2 (Desk Report): Impact Assessment of the Legal Instruments (IncludingComparison and Identification of Possible Gaps and Overlaps)
3.2.3 Phase 3 (Desk Report): Analysis and Synthesis of Evaluations
3.2.4 Phase 4 (Final Report): Developing Options for Future Legal Instruments
4 Phases 1 and 2: The Intervention Logic of the Legal Instruments
4.1 METHODOLOGY AND OVERALL FINDINGS
4.2 KEY FINDINGS PER PHASE
4.2.1 Key Findings from Phase 1
4.2.2 Key Findings of Phase 2
4.3 IMPLICATIONS FOR THE FUTURE LEGAL INSTRUMENTS
5 Phase 3: Linking Evaluation Results (2006-2011) to the Legal Instruments Objectives
5.1 METHODOLOGY AND OVERALL FINDINGS
5.2 KEY FINDINGS PER INSTRUMENT: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE FUTURE LEGAL INSTRUMENTS
5.2.1 The Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI)
5.2.2 European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI)
5.2.3 European Instrument for the Promotion of Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR)
5.2.4 Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation (INSC)
5.2.5 The Instrument for Stability (IfS)
5.2.6 Instrument for Cooperation with Industrialised and Other High-Income Countries(ICI)
5.3 OVERALL CONCLUSIONS BASED ON THE EVALUATION EVIDENCE
5.3.1 Horizontal conclusions: Implications for the Future Legal Instruments
5.3.2 Horizontal conclusions: Implications for Future Evaluation Programme
| 6 Phase 4 : recommendations for the Future legal instruments and their evaluation
6.1 IMPLICATIONS FOR THE FUTURE LEGAL INSTRUMENTS
6.1.1 Overall Assessment
6.1.2 The Specificities of the Individual Instruments
6.1.3 Improving the logic of future instruments
6.1.4 Identifying principles of good intervention logic design
6.1.5 Building the logic of an instrument from first principles
6.1.6 Horizontal Recommendations Applying to All Future Legal Instruments
6.1.7 Conclusion and recommendations for the new legal instruments
6.2 PROPOSALS FOR THE EVALUATION OF ACTIVITIES IN THE FUTURE PROGRAMMING PERIOD
6.2.1 Recommendation A: Improve explicit links between evaluation and the legalinstruments
6.2.2 Recommendation B: Adequate and timely coverage of all legal instruments
6.2.3 Recommendation C: Adequate baselines and ex-ante impact assessment as a basisfor future evaluations
6.2.4 Recommendation D: Provisions for synthesis evaluations and communication ofevaluation findings to Council and Parliament
7 Concluding Remarks
8 Bibliography
Annex: Reconstructed Intervention Logics
| VOLUME 2: THE INTERVENTION LOGICS
1. Introduction: The Intervention Logics for the Legal Instruments
2. Phase 1: Constructing the Faithful Intervention Logics
2.1 Step 1: Analysis of the Legal Instruments / Intervention Logic Diagrams
2.2 Step 2: Comparison of Legal Instruments
3. Phase 2: Analysing the Reconstructed Intervention Logics
3.1 Evidence Collected
3.2 Synthesis of the Evidence from Phase 2
3.3 Some Critical Questions Emerging from Phase 2
Annex 1: Comparing the 2004 DCECI Proposal with the 2006 DCI Regulation
Annex 2: Comparing the 2004 ENPI Proposal with the 2006 ENPI Regulation
Annex 3: Comparing the 2004 DCECI Proposal with the 2006 ICI Regulation
Annex 4: Comparing the Original EC Proposal on the EIDHR (2006) with the Changes
Introduced to the Final Text of the Regulation (2006)
Annex 5: Comparing the Nuclear SafetyProvisions in the 2004 IfS Proposal with the 2007 INSC Regulation
Annex 6: Faithful Intervention Logics
Annex 7: Reconstructed Intervention Logics
VOLUME 3: THE REVIEW OF EVALUATION REPORTS
About this Volume
1. Analysis of the Evaluation Evidence
2. Synthesis of the Phase 3 Evidence on the Six Legal Instruments
3. Review of Evidence on Implementation Issues
Annex 1: Grid for Analysing Evaluation Reports
Annex 2: Trends in Management, Modality, Approach and Performance
Author (Corp. Body): European Centre for Development Policy Management
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Aide a? la De?cision Economique, Ottignies Louvain la Neuve | Development Researchers Network | Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, Be
Year: 2011
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: EuropeAid/122888/C/SER/Multi | Request for Service: 2010/247813
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: foreign policyevaluationdevelopment aid policyEUEuropean Commissionbudget documentplanning instrument
Subject: Development aid. Aid programmes and aid organizationsEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIBEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Global ResourcesEurope. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of EU support to social protection in external action 2007 - 2013 : Final Report ; Volume I – Main Report
Title (other): Evaluation of EU support to social protection in external action 2007 - 2013 : Final Report ; Volume II – Country
Reports | Evaluation of EU support to social protection in external action 2007 - 2013 : Final Report ; Volume III –
Annexes
Abstract
The evaluation has three objectives:Provide an assessment on the attained results, their impact and sustainability, the good practices and pitfalls in Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance I(IPA I), European Neighbourhood Partnership Instrument (ENPI), Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI) and European Development Fund (EDF) programming and implementation.Assess the Intervention logic of IPA II, ENI, DCI (2014-2020) and 11th EDF planning documents addressing social protection, in order to assess their coherence with the relevant policy frameworks and programming guidelines. In particular, the evaluation assesses how the planning documents take on board past lessons, have moved towards Sector Approach and Sector Budget Support and to which extent they have established clear objectives, targets, indicators, baselines and monitoring mechanisms.Where possible, analyse current (i.e., post-2013) social protection programmes/projects to assess how well they reflect new approaches at this early stage of their implementation.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
List of acronyms and abbreviations
Executive Summary
1 Introduction
1.1 Mandate and scope of the evaluation
1.2 Structure of the report
2 Overall methodological approach
2.1 Steps for data collection and analysis
2.2 Challenges and limitations
3 Answers to the Evaluation Questions
3.1 EQ 1: Relevance
3.2 EQ 2: Basic social protection
3.3 EQ 3: European approaches and policy dialogues
3.4 EQ 4: Social partners and civil society
3.5 EQ 5: Social protection systems
3.6 EQ 6: Social exclusion – impact
3.7 EQ 7: Modalities ? strategic approach
3.8 EQ 8: Coherence, added value
4 Conclusions
4.1 Cluster 1: Policy framework and strategic focus
4.2 Cluster 2: Effects of EU support
4.3 Cluster 3: EU institutional environment and implementation approaches
5 Recommendations
5.1 Cluster 1: Policy framework and strategic focus
5.2 Cluster 2: EU support, institutional environment, and implementation approaches
List of boxes
List of figures
List of tables
| VOLUME II – EVIDENCE MATRIX WITH FIELD PHASE ANALYSIS – COUNTRY REPORTS
1. Synthesis Note presenting findings and conclusions of the field Country Reports
2. Bosnia and Herzegovina
3. El Salvador
4. Ethiopia
5. former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia
6. Kyrgyzstan
7. Malawi
8. Moldova
9. Montenegro
10. Morocco
11. Palestine
12. Turkey
VOLUME III – CONTEXT AND METHODOLOGY – ELECTRONIC DATA
1. Terms of Reference
2. List of documents consulted
3. List of people interviewed
4. Overview of EU - funded key interventions
5. Survey results
Author (Corp. Body): PARTICIP GmbH
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Directorate General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations | AETS
Year: 2018
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Ref. Ares(2018)908572
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: Ethiopiafinancial aidevaluationBosnia and HerzegovinaEl Salvadordevelopment aidEUjoining of the European Union
budget documentKyrgystancooperationMalawiMoroccoMacedoniaMontenegroPalestinepartnershipprogram
social securitysocial partnershipTurkeycivil society
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relationsEconomic and social developmentSocial security
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesMoldovaBosnia and HerzegovinaMontenegro
Republic of MacedoniaEl SalvadorMoroccoEthiopiaMalawiPalestinian TerritoryTurkeyKyrgyzstan
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
« Previous
Next »
Copyright (C) 2003-2019 European Documentation Centres / Update: 09.10.2019