Suche nach Schlagworten '00003902'

3 entries found on 1 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 3

Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),

« Previous
Next »
Title: Evaluation of the EU Support to Research and Innovation for Development in Partner Countries (2007 - 2013) : Final
Report ; Volume 1 – Main Report
Title (other): Evaluation of the EU Support to Research and Innovation for Development in Partner Countries (2007 - 2013) : Final
Report ; Volume 2 – Sector Evaluation Matrices | Evaluation of the EU Support to Research and Innovation for
Development in Partner Countries (2007 - 2013) : Final Report ; Volume 3 – ANNEXES 1 TO 8 | Evaluation of the EU
Support to Research and Innovation for Development in Partner Countries (2007 - 2013) : Final Report ; Volume 4 – ANNEX
9 | Evaluation of the EU Support to Research and Innovation for Development in Partner Countries (2007 - 2013) :
Executive Summary | Evaluation de l’Appui de l’UE à la Recherche et l’Innovation pour le Développement dans les
Pays Partenaires (2007 - 2013) : Résumé
Abstract
This evaluation examined the support the European Commission’s DG for Development and International Cooperation (DEVCO) provided to Research and Innovation (R&I) in partner countries during the last EU budget period (2007-2013).[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
1 Introduction
1.1 Mandate and scope of the evaluation
1.2 Structure of the report
2 Key methodological steps
2.1 Overall methodological approach
2.2 Selection of country, regions and interventions
2.3 Survey to EU Delegations
2.4 Challenges and limitations
3 Overall policy framework of the EU strategy in relation to Research and Innovation
3.1 General framework
3.2 International co-operation on Research and Innovation
3.3 Development and R&I
4 The intended intervention logics of EU support to Research and Innovation in partner countries
4.1 The intervention logic diagrams for DG DEVCO and DG RTD FP7
4.2 The different levels of the reconstructed DG DEVCO intervention logic
4.3 The different levels of the intervention logic for DG RTD FP7
5 Inventory analysis
5.1 Methodological limits and challenges
5.2 Main findings
5.3 Total and sector commitments
5.4 Geographic distribution
5.5 Distribution by domain
5.6 Distribution by channel of delivery
6 Answers to the evaluation questions
6.1 EQ 1: Development policy objectives
6.2 EQ 2: Impact on partner country research communities
6.3 EQ 3: Instruments and modalities
6.4 EQ 4: DEVCO-RTD complementarity and coherence
6.5 EQ 5: Transfer of R&I results into development processes
6.6 EQ 6: EU capacities
7 Overall assessment
8 Conclusions
8.1 Policy and strategic focus
8.2 Operational approach
8.3 Complementarity with other EU services
8.4 Results
9 Recommendations
9.1 Policy and strategy focus
9.2 Operational approach
9.3 Complementarity with other EU services
9.4 Results
| VOLUME 2 – SECTOR EVALUATION MATRICES
1. Part A – Food Security, Nutrition and Agriculture
2. Part B – Health
3. Part C – Environment and Climate Change
4. Part D – Science, Information Society and Space
VOLUME 3 –ANNEX 1 TO 8
1. Annex 1 – Terms of reference
2. Annex 2 – Inventory
3. Annex 3 – Case studies
4. Annex 4 – Survey to EU Delegations
5. Annex 5 – Final evaluation matrix
6. Annex 6 – List of persons interviewed
7. Annex 7 – Bibliography
8. Annex 8 – Methodology
VOLUME 4 – ANNEX 9: COUNTRY NOTES
1. Burkina Faso
2. Ethiopia
3. India
4. Kenya
5. Mauritius
6. Peru
7. South Africa
8. Tunisia
9. Ukraine
10. Vietnam
Author (Corp. Body): PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt, Freiburg im Breisgau
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Internationale Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung, Brüssel
Year: 2016
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract No EVA 2011/Lot 1 | Specific contract No 2013/330982
Language: en | fr
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EthiopiaevaluationBurkina Fasodevelopment aidEUresearch and developmentrealization of research resultsIndia
innovationKenyacooperationpartnershipPeruRepublic of South AfricaTunisiaUkraineVietnam
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relationsResearch
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesUkrainePeruTunisiaEthiopia
KenyaMauritiusSouth AfricaBurkina FasoIndiaVietnam
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: External Evaluation of the Partnership Instrument (2014 – mid 2017) : Final Report
Title (other): External Evaluation of the Partnership Instrument : (2014 – mid 2017) ; Final Report - Annexes | External Evaluation of
the Partnership Instrument : (2014 – mid 2017) ; Executive summary | External Evaluation of the Partnership Instrument
(PI) : (2014 – mid 2017) ; Short Summary
Abstract
The evaluation assesses whether the Partnership Instrument (PI) is fit for purpose and effective in delivering resources towards the achievement of the EU's external policy objectives, both at the start of the planning period (2014) and in the period since. The evaluation also considers the Instrument’s complementarities and synergies with the wider set of EU External Financing Instruments (EFIs). The geographical scope of the evaluation covers all countries eligible under the PI Regulation, with a focus on six countries (Argentina, Brazil, China, India, Mexico and the United States) where individual actions were examined via a series of mid-term and final evaluations.The overarching purpose of the assignment is to provide an independent evaluation of the Partnership Instrument and to identify key lessons learned to improve current programming and inform future decision-making. In addition, the evaluation of the PI for the period 2014-2017, together with parallel evaluations of other EFIs under the Multi-annual Financial Framework (MFF), will inform the mid-term review (MTR) of the EFIs.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
Synthèse analytique
0. Outline
1. Introduction
2. Methodology
3. Answers to the evaluation questions
3.1. Relevance
3.2. Effectiveness
3.3. Efficiency
3.4. EU Added Value
3.5. Coherence, Consistency, Complementarities and Synergies
4. Overall conclusions and recommendations
4.1. Conclusions
4.2. Recommendations
List of Figures
Figure 1: PI - indicative versus deployed financial allocations per specific objective (in %)
Figure 2: PI - indicative versus deployed financial allocations per region (in %)
List of Tables
Table 1: Estimated % of PI budget allocated to mainstreaming climate action and biodiversity
Table 2: Indicative financial allocations 2014- 2020 (MEUR, MIP)
Table 3: Overview of the ratio of administrative costs to overall budget for all EFIs
| Annexes
Annex 1: Monitoring and Evaluation framework
1A - PI Intervention Logic
1B – PI common indicators
1C – Glossary
Annex 2: Evaluation approach
2A – Evaluation Questions Matrix
2B – Evaluation design and evaluation tools
Annex 3: PI Relevance to EU priorities over time
Annex 4: Reference list
Annex 5: Consultation strategy
Annex 6: Interview guides
Annex 7: Interview programme
Annex 8: Database analysis
Annex 9: Evaluation of the CIR
Annex 10: Online survey analysis
Annex 11: Open Public Consultation
Annex 12: The contribution to PI specific objectives by actions evaluated individually
Annex 13: The cluster approach
Annex 14: How PI intervention areas are aligned with EU external action framework
Author (Corp. Body): Economisti Associati Srl
Contributer: European Commission / Service for Foreign Policy Instruments | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Internationale Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung | Coffey International Development Ltd
Year: 2017
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: FWC COM 2015 | Europe Aid/137211/DH/SER/Multi | Lot 1: EVALUATION
Language: en | fr
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: Argentinaforeign policyevaluationBrazilChinadevelopment aid policyEUfinancial assistance
IndiacooperationMexicopartnershipUnited States of America
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIBEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesUSAMexikoArgentinaBrazil
IndiaChina
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Study on the responsible management of the supply chain in the garment sector
Title (other): External Support – Study on responsible management of the supply chain in the garment sector - 2015 : Final report
Abstract
The objective of this study is to contribute to an ongoing background analysis, building on work already carried out within and outside of the European Commission with respect to engagement in the garment sector to support sustainability in the garment industry. The analysis will essentially serve to assist the Commission in clarifying its ideas and identifying potential focus areas on where added value in the sector can be provided at EU level.The main components of this study are (1) an analysis of social, environmental and economic indicators for different garment producing countries, (2) an overview and characterisation of key sustainability initiatives in the garment sector and (3) an analysis of possible opportunities to make supply chains in the garment sector more responsible.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
List of tables
List of figures
Table of acronyms and abbreviations
Terms and definitions
Executive summary
Introduction
Methodology
1 Sustainability initiatives and voluntary standards in the garment sector
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Grouping standards and other initiatives
1.3 Focus on social aspects
1.4 Focus on the environment
1.5 Initiatives that address several aspects of responsible supply chain management
1.6 Key trends in sustainability initiatives
1.6.1 From voluntary standards to partnership programs
1.6.2 Focus on one production country
1.6.3 Focus on health and safety
2 Garment producing countries
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Some general observations about the selected countries
2.2.1 Key indicators
2.2.2 Key issues in the garment sector
2.3 Bangladesh
2.3.1 Key indicators
2.3.2 Detailed sector profile
2.3.3 Key issues in the garment sector
2.3.4 EU trade and development interest, economic importance of the garment sector
2.3.5 Trade flows
2.4 Cambodia
2.4.1 Key indicators
2.4.2 Detailed sector profile
2.4.3 Key issues in the garment sector
2.4.4 EU trade and development interest, economic importance of the garment sector
2.4.5 Trade flows
2.5 India
2.5.1 Key indicators
2.5.2 Key issues in the garment sector
2.5.3 EU trade and development interest, economic importance of the garment sector
2.2.4 Trade flows
2.6 Indonesia
2.6.1 Key indicators
2.6.2 Key issues in the garment sector
2.6.3 EU trade and development interest, economic importance of the garment sector
2.2.4 Trade flows
2.7 Morocco
2.7.1 Key indicators
| 2.7.2 Key issues in the garment sector
2.7.3 EU trade and development interest, economic importance of the garment sector
2.2.4 Trade flows
2.8 Pakistan
2.8.1 Key indicators
2.8.2 Key issues in the garment sector
2.8.3 EU trade and development interest, economic importance of the garment sector
2.2.4 Trade flows
2.9 Sri Lanka
2.9.1 Key indicators
2.9.2 Key issues in the garment sector
2.9.3 EU trade and development interest, economic importance of the garment sector
2.8.4 Trade flows
2.10 Tunisia
2.10.1 Key indicators
2.10.2 Key issues in the garment sector
2.10.3 EU trade and development interest, economic importance of the garment sector
2.9.4 Trade flows
2.11 Turkey
2.11.1 Key indicators
2.11.2 Key issues in the garment sector
2.11.3 EU trade and development interest, economic importance of the garment sector
2.10.4 Trade flows
2.12 Vietnam
2.12.1 Key indicators
2.12.2 Detailed sector profile
2.12.3 Key issues in the garment sector
2.12.4 EU trade and development interest, economic importance of the garment sector
2.12.5 Trade flows
2.13 Ethiopia
2.13.1 Key indicators
2.13.2 Key issues in the garment sector
2.13.3 EU trade and development interest, economic importance of the garment sector
2.13.4 Trade flows
2.14 Myanmar
2.14.1 Key indicators
2.14.2 Detailed sector profile
2.14.3 Key issues in the garment sector
2.14.4 EU trade and development interest, economic importance of the garment sector
2.15 China as an investment partner
3 Engaging in responsible management of the garment supply chain at EU level – looking ahead
4 Findings and recommendations
4.1 Countries in focus (Where?)
4.2 Issues to focus on (What?)
4.3 Implementation (How?)
5 Bibliography
Author (Corp. Body): AETS
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Internationale Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung
Year: 2016
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: FWC COM 2011 - Lot 1 – Studies and Technical Assistance in all Sectors | Contract N° 2015/368356/1 | EuropeAid/129783/C/SER/Multi
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EthiopiaanalysisBangladeshChinadevelopment aidEUmanufacturingIndia
indicatorIndonesiaindustrial sectorCambodiaclothingMoroccoMyanmarPakistansocial indicatorsSri Lanka
TurkeyTunisiaenvironmental compatibilityVietnameconomic development (on national level)
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIBEuropean Community external relationsTextile industry
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesMoroccoTunisiaEthiopia
TurkeyBangladeshIndiaPakistanSri LankaChinaIndonesiaCambodiaMyanmarVietnam
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
« Previous
Next »
Copyright (C) 2003-2019 European Documentation Centres / Update: 09.10.2019