Suche nach Schlagworten '00004523'
5 entries found on 1 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 5Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),
« Previous
Next »
Title: Die Erweiterung der Europäischen Union: Was bedeutet das für unsere Umwelt? |
---|
Title (other): Enlarging the European Union: What does it mean for our environment? | Élargissement de l'Union Européenne: quelles conséquences sur notre environnement? |
Series Title: Das Europa von Morgen: Die Kernfragen | Tomorrow's Europe: The Key issues | L?Europe de demain: Les réponses à vos questions |
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung |
Year: 2002 |
Language: en | de | fr |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: EU expansionnuclear energyenvironmental policyenvironmental protection |
Subject: European Community treaties and agreementsNuclear industry. Nuclear safetyProtection of the environment |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu.int/) |
Title: Evaluation of EU funding of research in the fields of nuclear fusion and aeronautics/aerospace |
---|
Abstract Regarding research funding in general, the study finds that lessons learned from FP6 have been only partially reflected in the structure of FP7, but considers the new framework as potentially more conducive to SME involvement. The share of research funding allocated to energy has declined from 66% in 1983 to 10,5% under FP7, of which a growing proportion has been allocated to nuclear fusion, and particularly the ITER programme, increasingly squeezing out funding for research on alternative energy sources. Regarding ITER, the study concludes that the organisational and management arrangements in place are insufficient to tackle the extreme riskiness of the project. Projects launched in 2006 and 2007 in the field of aerospace/aeronautics were found to be consistent with the EU's medium term goals but improved risk management in launching and implementing large research projects in this field was recommended.[European Parliament] |
Author: Renda, Andrea | Felci, Alice | Mykolaitis, Donatas |
Series Title:European Parliament - Study |
Publisher: Europäische Union / Europäisches Parlament |
Year: 2008 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: InvestmentAircraft and Aerospace Industrynuclear energy |
Subject: European Community funds and other financial instrumentsScience. Research. Methodology |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäisches Parlament (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/) |
Title: Working together to improve nuclear safety |
---|
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid |
Publisher: Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen, Luxemburg |
Year: 2009 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978927914251-2 | KQ-80-09-121-EN-C |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: development aid policyEUnuclear energynuclear power plantsecurity |
Subject: Aid programmesNuclear industry. Nuclear safety |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesEastern Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Study evaluating the status quo and the legal implications of third party liability for the European security industry |
---|
Title (other): Study evaluating the status quo and the legal implications of third party liability for the European Security Industry : Annex III Country Reports |
Abstract Third party liability has been identified as an issue that could adversely impact the European security industry. Limitless third party liability for security product and services is believed to have the potential to reduce investments in innovation. In the US, the Safety Act (which is further discussed in Section 3, below) has been enacted to empower the government to provide protection against liability exposure. This development has convinced the EU to examine the legal implications of third party liability of the security industry and possible policy options. To this end, the Commission, DG ENTR, has commissioned this study, which has been carried out by METRO (University of Maastricht), ECTIL, and Hunton & Williams.The main objectives of this study are:To collect, analyze and assess data from various legal sources and actual best practices related to the field of third party liability;To provide a comprehensive overview on the current status of third party liability-related legal implications for security industry, To provide a portfolio of feasible policy options for the Commission to address these implications effectively, taking into account that the findings and their respective easoning will present the potential basis for wideranging policy decisions by the European Commission.Thus, this study focuses on understanding the third party liability exposure of the EU-based Security Industry (SI), analyzes the US Safety Act and its context, and identifies policy options relating to the SIs liability exposure.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents List of Abbreviations Executive Summary 1. Introduction and background 2. Definition of security industry and methodology 3. Analysis of comparable EU legislation and related case law and potential analogy - bearing international law treaties 4. Analysis of comparable EU-Member States legislation and related case law 5. Analysis of the US Safety Act and liability system 6. Policy options 7. Conclusions Chapter 1 Introduction ... Chapter 2 A definition of the security industry in Europe ... Chapter 3 Analysis of comparable EU legislation ... Chapter 4 Analysis of comparable EU-Member States legislation and related case law ... Chapter 5 Analysis of potential analogy bearing international law treaties on civil aviation, nuclear safety and environmental liability ... Chapter 6 Analysis of legal practices by industries exposed to analogous risks and by their insurers ... Chapter 7 The US SAFETY Act ... Chapter 8Conclusions and policy options ... List of References Annex I: Common format for analysis Annex II: Overview of stakeholder participants Annex III: Country reports (in separate file) | Annex III 2 England & Wales France Germany The Netherlands Poland Spain Sweden |
Author (Corp. Body): METRO | ECTIL | Hunton & Williams |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Unternehmen und Industrie |
Year: 2013 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Ref. Ares(2013)3320480 | Ref. Ares(2013)3360201 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: service enterpriseEUlegislationliabilityinnovation capacitynuclear energyair trafficpolice lawjurisdictionsecurityenvironmental protectioninsurance benefitcivil law |
Subject: European Community treaties and agreementsCivil liability |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesUSA |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: External Evaluation of the Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation : (2014 mid 2017) ; Final Report Vol. I |
---|
Title (other): External Evaluation of the Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation : (2014 mid 2017) ; Final Report Vol. II | Evaluation of the Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation : Final Report ; Executive Summary | External Evaluation of the Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation : Short Summary |
Abstract The objective of the mid-term review evaluation is to provide an external assessment of the Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation over the period 2014-2017, contributing to lesson-learning and accountability; the focus of the evaluation is on the Instrument, and on whether it is fit for purpose and still a valid basis for the Commissions undertaking of its activities in a changing context.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction and evaluation goals 2 Background, approach and evaluation questions 2.1 Background 2.2 The Evaluation Questions 2.3 The evaluation process 2.4 Structure of the Evaluation Report 2.5 Challenges and methodology 2.6 Implementation State of Play 3 Responses to the evaluation questions 3.1 EQ 1 on relevance 3.2 EQ 2 on effectiveness, impact and sustainability 3.3 EQ 3 on efficiency 3.1 EQ 4 on added value 3.2 EQ 5 on coherence, consistency, complementarity and synergies 3.3 EQ 6 on leverage 4 Conclusions and Recommendations List of figures Figure 1: Number (Horizontal axis) and age groups age male/female trainees (Vertical axis) Figure 2: Resource allocation INSC-II List of boxes Box 1. INSC need assessment in Ukraine Box 2. Financing Agreement Box 3 Statements on INSC Added Value Box 4. Blending and nuclear safety cooperation | VOLUME II: ANNEXES Annex 1: Instrument Intervention logic Annex 2: Evaluation framework and finalindicator list Annex 3: Overview of the instrument Annex 4: Key methodological elements Annex 5: CIR Assessment Annex 6: Case study Annex 7: ROM comparative analysis Annex 8: Evaluation matrix Annex 9: Internal working document for analysis of activities and results Annex 10: Illustrative material for EQ Annex 11: Consultation Process following the publication of the draft final report Annex 12: Consultation strategy |
Author (Corp. Body): GDSI Limited |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Internationale Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung | Altair Asesores S.L. | A.R.S. Progetti S.P.A. | EEO Group | Euro Consultants | Pohl Consulting & Associates |
Year: 2017 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: FWC COM 2015 | EuropeAid/137211/DH/SER/Multi | Specific Contract No° 2016/376002 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: evaluationdevelopment aid policyEUnuclear energycooperationsecurity |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIBEuropean Community external relationsNuclear industry. Nuclear safety |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
« Previous
Next »