Suche nach Schlagworten '00005017'

3 entries found on 1 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 3

Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),

« Previous
Next »
Title: Progress Made and Existing Gaps in the Field of Judicial co-operation in criminal matters
Abstract
The briefing note provides an overview of the progress made and existing gaps in the field of judicial co-operation in criminal matters. It first reviews perceived difficulties with the pillar structure and examines the amendments that the Reform Treaty - due to be formally adopted at the European Council in December 2007 - would introduce. The different approaches to co-operation at a European level, i.e. mutual legal assistance, mutual recognition and approximation are also analysed. A particular emphasis is placed on current legislative proposals and other developments, such as the current state of play of the European Arrest Warrant, Eurojust and the European Judicial Network in criminal matters. Finally, the EU external relations in the field of judicial co-operation in criminal matters are also briefly mentioned. [European Parliament]
Author: Castillo, José
Series Title:European Parliament - Briefing Paper
Publisher: Europäische Union / Europäisches Parlament
Year: 2007
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: PE 393.265
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Arbeitspapiere, Preprints
Keyword: European cooperationpenal policy
Subject: Law. Jurisprudence. Legal systemsCriminal law. Penal sanctions. Penal institutions
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäisches Parlament (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/)
Title: Study to Support an Impact Assessment on Options for Combatting Illicit Firearms Trafficking in the European Union :
Final Report
Abstract
The purpose of the study was to:Analyse the current legal framework in all Member States including the definitions of specific offences relating to firearms trafficking, the sanctions, the liability of legal and natural persons and the notions of intent, negligence and aggravating or mitigating circumstances; Analyse the implementation of the above-mentioned offences in practice and identify possible obstacles in police and judicial cooperation due to the existence of different legal systems; Make recommendations as to the advisability of the approximation of certain offences and sanctions and suggest specific provisions if appropriate. The purpose of this study was to provide DG Home with information required for the Impact Assessment to determine the most appropriate policy option within the context of possible changes to the 2008 Directive. The research involved desk research to examine legal frameworks and other information, a survey of key stakeholders, an interview programme, and three workshops covering the Benelux countries, Baltic States and the Western Balkans, Austria and Hungary, which were attended by representatives from a total of 11 Member States. [Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
1. Introduction
1.1 Resume – Study objectives and scope
1.2 Background to the study
1.3 Research plan and data collection
1.4 Structure of the final report
2. Problem Definition
2.1 Overview
2.2 Nature and scale of illicit firearms trafficking
2.3 Cross border dimension of the problem
2.4 Consequences of illicit firearms trafficking
2.5 Main payers and drivers of illicit firearms trafficking
2.6 Illicit firearms trafficking and the European armaments sector
2.7 Existing institutional framework for combatting arms trafficking
2.8 Summary–problem definition
3.Comparative Analysis of Legal Issues
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Current legislative framework at the international and EU levels
3.3 Comparative analysis of national legislation on firearms trafficking
3.4 Conclusions - Comparative legal analysis
4.Policy Objectives & Evaluation of Policy Options
4.1 Overview – Policy objectives and options
4.2 Policy Option 1 – Status quo and baseline scenario
4.3 Policy Option 2(a)– Non-legislative action
4.4 Policy Option 2(b)– Minimum legislative intervention
4.5 Policy Option 3 - Comprehensive legislative solution
4.6 Policy Option 4 – Combination of policy options
4.7 Evaluation of the policy options
4.8 Preferred option
4.9 Monitoring and evaluation
5.Conclusions & Recommendations
5.1 The problem of illicit firearms trafficking
5.2 Existing legal frameworks to combat illicit arms trafficking
5.3 Policy objectives and evaluation of policy options
APPENDICES
A. Supporting Information – Definitions and Policy Context
B. Supporting Information – Problem Definition
C. Analysis of Survey Responses
D. Comparative Tables for Legal Analysis
Author (Corp. Body): Centre for Strategy & Evaluation Services
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Inneres
Publisher: Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen, Luxemburg
Year: 2014
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978-92-79-39934-3
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EUcommerceillegitimacycriminalitypenal policyweapon
Subject: European Community lawCriminal law. Penal sanctions. Penal institutions
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Country studies for the project on right to interpretation and translation and the right to information in criminal
proceedings in the EU : background material for the FRA report "Rights of suspected and accused persons across the EU"
Abstract
These country reports from EU Member States constitute the background material for the FRA report on 'The right to interpretation and translation and the right to information in criminal proceedings in the EU'. The information in the country reports is prepared under contract by the FRA’s research network FRANET. This document was commissioned under contract as background material for comparative analysis by the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights (FRA) for the project 'The right to interpretation and translation and the right to information in criminal proceedings in the EU'. The information and views contained in the document do not necessarily reflect the views or the official position of the FRA. The document is made publicly available for transparency and information purposes only and does not constitute legal advice or legal opinion. [Author vide Copyright]
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Union / Agentur für Grundrechte
Year: 2015
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Arbeitspapiere, Preprints
Keyword: EUpenal policyhuman rightslegal protection
Subject: Law. Jurisprudence. Legal theoryHuman rights
Countries Scheme: Germany. General ResourcesAustria. General ResourcesDenmarkFinlandSweden
EstoniaLatviaLithuaniaPolandSlovak RepublicCzech RepublicHungaryBulgariaCroatiaRomania
SloveniaGreeceItalyMaltaPortugalSpainCyprusBelgiumFrance, EuropeUnited KingdomIrelandLuxembourgNetherlands
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Agentur für Grundrechte (http://fra.europa.eu/)
« Previous
Next »
Copyright (C) 2003-2019 European Documentation Centres / Update: 09.10.2019