Suche nach Schlagworten '00005149'

31 entries found on 2 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 20

Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),

1 | 2
« Previous
Next »
Title: The future of rural areas in the CEE new Member States
Abstract
The aim of this report is to analyse the current situation and future prospects of rural areas in the eight central and eastern European countries acceding to the European Union on 1 May 2004 - Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Poland, the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Hungary and Slovenia - as well as in Romania and Bulgaria, which will likely become EU members in 2007. Rural development measures have become more important in recent years. As shown in the reform of the Common Agricultural Policy in June 2003, as well as in the conclusions of the Second European Conference on Rural Development, held in Salzburg in November 2003, this importance will grow further in the future. By improving the knowledge of rural areas in central and eastern Europe, the results of this analysis shall support policy makers who aim to reduce disparities between the levels of development of the various regions in the EU. [Urheber s. Copyright]
Author (Corp. Body): Network of Independent Agricultural Expertsin the CEE Candidate Countries
Publisher: Institut für Agrarentwicklung in Mittel und Osteuropa
Year: 2004
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EU expansionrural developmentrural arearural regionEast Central Europe
Subject: European Communities and European Union in generalAgricultural policy. Agricultural development
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu.int/)
Title: SAPARD Annual Report - Year 2000
Title (other): Report from the Commission to the Council, The European Parliament, The Economic and Social Committee and the Committee
of the Regions
Series Title: COM(2001)341 final
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission
Year: 2001
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EU expansionrural developmentagricultural development
Subject: Agricultural policy. Agricultural developmentRural areas
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu.int/)
Title: Gründung von Partnerschaften im Hinblick auf den Beitritt : Multilingual abridged edition
Title (other): Creating partnerships for Pre-Accession | Création de partenariats en vue de la Préadhision (fr)
Abstract
Hintergrund des Workshops war die geplante Erweiterung der Europäischen Union um 10 mittel- und osteuropäische Länder. Diese Länder müssen sich mit wichtigen Fragen bezüglich der Landwirtschaft und der ländlichen Entwicklung befassen. [...] Dementsprechend wurde im Juni 1999 ein Workshop mit dem Titel "Gründung von Partnerschaften im Hinblick auf den Beitritt" veranstaltet. Sein Ziel war es, die ländliche Entwicklung in den Vorbeitritts-Ländern durch die Förderung einer aktiven Partnerschaft und einen Erfahrungs- und Wissensaustausch unter den vielen beteiligten Akteuren zu unterstützen. [Europäisches Parlament]
Series Title:European Parliament - Working Papers ; AGRI 132/AM
Author (Corp. Body): HushållningsSällskapens Förbund, Stockholm
Publisher: Europäisches Parlament / Generaldirektion Wissenschaft
Year: 1999
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: PE 168.643/AM
Language: de
Ressource: Einzelne Arbeitspapiere, Preprints
Keyword: EU enlargementrural developmenteastwards expansion
Subject: International relationsAgricultural policy. Agricultural development
Countries Scheme: Eastern Europe. General ResourcesEastern Central Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäisches Parlament (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/)
Title: European Commission's support to the Republic of Moldova : country level evaluation ; Final synthesis report
Title (other): EVInfo; Observations ...; Fiche contradictoire | Evaluation of the European Commission’s Support to the Republic of
Moldova : Ref. 1094 , EVINFO | Fiche Contratictoire : Evaluation of the European Commission's support to the Republic of
Moldova | Evaluation of the European Commission's support to the Republic of Moldova : Observations and Judgement on the
final evaluation report | Fiche Contradictoire : Evaluation of the European Commission's support to the Republic of
Moldova : Follow-up (one year later)
Abstract
The purpose of this evaluation is to provide policy-makers and managers of the Commission’s relevant external co-operation Services as well as other relevant DGs (such as DG Trade and DG Environment), and the EC Delegations in Chisinau and Kiev, with an independent assessment of the EC programme of co-operation with Moldova. The quality of EC assistance is assessed on the basis of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Development Assistance Committee (DAC) criteria of relevance, effectiveness, impact, efficiency, and sustainability. The "3Cs" of coordination, complementarity, and coherence are also covered. The period covered by the evaluation is 2000-2006. However, as it is intended to be a forward-looking document, the team did not abruptly truncate the analysis at the end of 2006.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1. Purpose of the evaluation
1.2. Analysis and main findings
1.3. Overall Conclusions
1.4. Overall recommendations
2. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ANSWERS TO EVALUATION QUESTIONS
2.1. Overview of Evaluation Questions
2.2. EQ (J) Justice and Home Affairs
2.3. EQ (N) - NGOs and Civil Society
2.4. EQ (S) - SMEs and Rural Development
2.5. EQ (E) - Trade and Economy
2.6. EQ(F) – FSP
2.7. EQ (H) - Health
2.8. EQ(X) – Environment
2.9. EQ (T)-Transnistria
2.10. EQ (R) –Relevance and Coherence
2.11. EQ(C) – Coordination and Complementarity
3. SECTOR-SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS
3.1. EQ (J) - Justice and Home Affairs
3.2. EQ (N) – NGOs and Civil Society
3.3. EQ(S) - SMEs and rural development
3.4. EQ (E) – Trade and economic links
3.5. EQ (F) – Food Security Programme (FSP)
3.6. EQ(H) – Health
3.7. EQ(X) – Environment
3.8. EQ (T) – Transnistria
3.9. EQ (R) – Relevance and Coherence
3.10. EQ (C) – Coordination and Complementarity
OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF THE EC CO-OPERATION STRATEGY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
3.11. Global Evaluation of the EC strategy
3.12. Conclusions
3.13. Overall Recommendations
Author (Corp. Body): EGEval II EEIG
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen | PARTICIP GmbH
Year: 2007
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Ref. 1094
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EU countriesDevelopment AidHuman resourcesMoldovadevelopment aiddevelopment aid policyEUEuropean Commission
health care delivery systemcommercejudiciarycooperationrural developmentsustainabilityfoodenvironmental policyeconomic cooperationcivil society
Subject: Bilateral and multilateral aidEuropean Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesMoldova
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu./)
Title: Screening report Croatia : Chapter 11: Agriculture and Rural Development
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung
Year: 2006
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EU expansionCroatiarural developmentagriculture
Subject: European Community external relations and associated countries
Countries Scheme: Croatia
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Screening report Turkey : Chapter 11: Agriculture and Rural Development
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung
Year: 2006
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EU expansionrural developmentagricultureTurkey
Subject: European Community external relations and associated countries
Countries Scheme: Turkey
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Sector Approaches in Agriculture and Rural Development
Title (other): Approches sectorielles en agriculture et développement rural
Table of Contents
Abbreviations
Acknowledgements
1. Executive summary
1.1 Basic concepts and definitions
1.2 What is different in agriculture and rural development?
1.3 Policy and strategic frameworks
1.4 Sector budget and public finance management
1.5 Sector and donor coordination
1.6 Institutions and capacities
1.7 Performance monitoring and accountability
1.8 Conclusions
2. Introduction
2.1 Background
2.2 Purpose
2.3 Basis and context
3. Basic concepts and definitions
3.1 Sector approach and sector programme
3.2 The seven assessment areas
3.3 How wide is ‘sector-wide’?
3.4 Arrangements for fi nancial support to sector programmes
3.5 From projects to programmes
4. What’s different in agriculture and rural development?
4.1 Experiences in agriculture
4.2 Recent insights
4.3 Moving from an aid delivery to a sector development perspective
4.4 Adopting a political economy and an actor perspective in sector analysis
4.5 Integrating decentralisation
5. Policy and strategic frameworks
5.1 Sound macro and sector policy frameworks
5.2 A sector approach to policy alignment
5.3 Policy and legislative frameworks for private sector-led agricultural growth
5.4 Policy ingredients that enhance the pro-poor effects of agricultural growth
5.5 Clarity of roles as a minimum requirement
5.6 Taking account of winners and losers at the policy stage
5.7 Policy ownership and non-state actors
5.8 Key issues regarding policy and strategic frameworks
6. The sector budget and public fi nance management
6.1 A public sector budget that mirrors sector policy and government tasks
6.2 Aligning sector programmes to country structures
6.3 Linking sector budgets to medium-term expenditure frameworks
6.4 Assessing the macro-economy and public fi nance management
6.5 The importance of the revenue side in public fi nance management
6.6 Choosing the right financial support modalities
6.7 Balancing f
Series Title: Tools and Methods Series : Reference Document ; 5 | Collection outils et méthodes : Document de référence ; 5
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung
Publisher: Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen
Year: 2008
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978-92-79-11431-1 | KQ-BB-09-003-EN-C | 978-92-79-11433-5 | KQ-BB-09-003-FR-C
Language: en | fr
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: development aid policyEUrural developmentagricultureeconomic policy by sectors
Subject: Development aid. Aid programmes and aid organizationsDevelopment plans. Regions
Countries Scheme: Global Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Sector Approaches in Agriculture and Rural Development : Short version.
Title (other): Approches sectorielles en agriculture et développement rural : Version courte
Table of Contents
Abbreviations
Part I Sector Approaches In Agriculture And Rural Development
1.1 Basic concepts and definitions
1.2 What is different in agriculture and rural development?
1.3 Policy and strategic framework
1.4 Sector budget and public finance management
1.5 Sector and donor coordination
1.6 Institutions and capacities
1.7 Performance monitoring and accountability
1.8 Conclusions
Part II Key Messages
2.1 Policy and strategic frameworks
2.2 The sector budget and public finance management
2.3 Sector and donor coordination
2.4 Institutions and capacities
2.5 Performance monitoring and accountability
References
Series Title: Tools and Methods Series : Reference Document ; 5 | Collection outils et méthodes : Document de référence ; 5
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung
Publisher: Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen
Year: 2008
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978-92-79-11428-1 | KQ-BB-09-002-EN-C | 978-92-79-11433-5 | KQ-BB-09-003-FR-C
Language: en | fr
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: development aid policyEUrural developmentagricultureeconomic policy by sectors
Subject: Development aid. Aid programmes and aid organizationsDevelopment plans. Regions
Countries Scheme: Global Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: IPA - interim evaluation and meta-evaluation of IPA assistance : Country Report Montenegro ; The European Union's IPA
Program for Western Balkans and Turkey
Table of Contents
List of abbreviations
Executive Summary
1 Scope of work
1.1 Introduction
1.2 Summary methodology
1.3 Sectors and projects included in the sample
1.4 Sources of information
2 Sector analysis
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Progress in the Environment & Energy sector
...
2.3 Progress in the area of Agriculture, Rural Development and Fisheries
...
2.4 Conclusions
3 IPA Programme performance
3.1 Introduction
3.2 Effectiveness
...
3.3 Efficiency
...
3.4 Sustainability
4 Analysis of the impact of IPA assistance
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Does IPA assistance address priority issues?
4.3 Impact in Environment& Energy
4.4 Impact in Agriculture& Fisheries
4.5 Additional impact
...
4.6 Conclusions on impact
5 Key conclusions and recommendations
5.1 Thematic and programme level conclusions
5.2 Recommendations
...
Annexes
Annex 1 Evaluation Matrix
Annex 2 List of documents used
Annex 3 List of interviews
Annex 4 List of people trained
Annex 5 Detailed sector analysis
Annex 6 The evaluation methodology
Annex 7 Debriefing note
Author (Corp. Body): ECORYS NEI, Rotterdam
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung
Year: 2013
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: EuropeAid/131184/C/SER/Multi | KOP/RG II23914rep Montedengro def
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: energydevelopment aidEUjoining of the European Unionfinancial assistancefisheryrural developmentagriculture
Montenegrosustainabilityenvironment
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIBEuropean Community external relationsAgricultural policy. Agricultural developmentFishery management. Fishery developmentEnergyEnvironment
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Montenegro
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Screening report Montenegro : Chapter 11 – Agriculture and Rural Development
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung
Year: 2013
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: MD 146/13
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EUjoining of the European Unionrural developmentagricultureMontenegro
Subject: European Community external relationsAgricultural policy. Agricultural development
Countries Scheme: Montenegro
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Screening report Iceland : Chapter 11 – Agriculture and Rural Development
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung
Contributer: Europäische Kommission
Year: 2011
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EUjoining of the European UnionIcelandrural developmentagriculture
Subject: European Community external relationsAgricultural policy. Agricultural development
Countries Scheme: Iceland
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation to support the preparation of pre-accession financial instruments beyond 2013 : Final Report
Abstract
This is the Final Report for the forward-looking evaluation on the future pre-accession financial instrument beyond 2013, commissioned by Directorate-General for Enlargement (DG ELARG) of the European Commission (EC). The work was carried out between December 2010 and May 2011 by the European Policy Evaluation Consortium (EPEC), and led by the EPEC grouping member GHK with support from EPEC partner Technopolis. The work has been undertaken under the guidance of a Reference Group chaired by DG ELARG and including representatives of other DGs of the Commission.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
List of acronyms
Executive summary
1 Introduction
1.1 Purpose of the report and study objectives
1.2 The EU’s enlargement policy
1.3 Past EU support to the pre-accession process
1.4 The Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance
1.5 Method
1.6 Structure of the report
2 The problems addressed
2.1 Introduction
2.2 Problem 1: The need to realise the benefits of enlargement
2.3 Problem 2: Gap between the conditions in candidate countries and potential candidates and those in the EU
2.4 Problem 3: Lack of readiness to implement EU programmes and related obligations
2.5 Problem 4: Challenges in the current implementation arrangements for IPA
3 The baseline scenario 2013-2018 and the European added value of a future programme
...
4 Policy objectives
...
5 Policy options
...
6 Assessment of alternative policy options
...
7 Key modifications to the delivery of IPA considered
...
8 Monitoring and evaluation arrangements
...
Annexes
Annex 1 Path towards EU Membership
Annex 2 Background on beneficiaries
...
Annex 3 Pre-accession programmes prior to IPA
...
Annex 4 Component structure and delivery mechanisms of IPA
Annex 5 The findings of the online consultations
...
Annex 6 The benefits of enlargement and costs of non-enlargement
Annex 7 Beneficiary development trends
Annex 8 Detailed budget assumptions of the policy options
Annex 9 Draft intervention logic
Author (Corp. Body): GHK | Technopolis | European Policy Evaluation Consortium
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung
Year: 2011
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationdemocratizationEUjoining of the European Unionfinancial assistanceaffirmative actioncross border cooperationassistance
human capitalinstitutionrural developmentregional development
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesIcelandSoutheastern Europe, Balkan peninsula. General ResourcesTurkey
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Retrospective Evaluation of the CARDS programmes : Country: Kosovo ; Sectors: Justice, Energy, Economic development and
Rural development ; Final Evaluation Report
Abstract
This evaluation covers CARDS assistance from 2001-2006 national programmes to Kosovo under UNSCR 1244/99 (hereafter Kosovo)....This report was prepared by COWI A/S during the period from January 2008 to June 2009 and reflects the situation as of 31 March 2009, the cut of date for the report....The report examines the progress of the programme towards the objectives stated in the formal programming documents, i.e. Financing Memorandum, Project Fiches, etc. It is intended to provide strategic and operation management information for the Commission Services, the Monitoring Meeting and the beneficiaries. It draws conclusions and puts forward recommendations and provides a judgement on sectoral and sub-sectoral (cluster) performance....[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Preface
List of Acronyms
Executive Summary
Përmbledhja Analitike
Izvršni Rezime
1 Introduction
1.1 Objectives and Scope of Evaluation
1.2 Country Context
1.3 The CARDS Programme in Kosovo
2 Performance of CARDS
2.1 Justice
2.2 Energy
2.3 Economic Development
2.4 Rural Development
2.5 Overall Findings
3 Thematic and Cross-cutting Findings
3.1 CARDS is beginning to support gender equality and inclusion of minorities in a more targeted manner
3.2 CARDS has to some extent promoted sustainable development including protection of the environment
3.3 CARDS has in some sectors strengthened the effectiveness/efficiency of the donor coordination
4 Conclusions and Recommendations
4.1 Conclusions
4.2 Lessons Learned & Recommendations
4.3 Conclusions and Recommendations Table
Table of Appendices
Annex 1 Scope of Evaluation - List of Projects (desk studies and interviews)
Annex 2 Performance rating per project and sector
Annex 3 Evaluation Questions and Indicators
Annex 4 Indicators of Achievement
Annex 5 List of Interviews
Annex 6 List of Documents
Author (Corp. Body): COWI AS
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung
Year: 2009
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationenergydevelopment aidEUjoining of the European UnionjudiciaryKosovorural development
economic development (on national level)
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIBEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesKosovo
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Study on environmental consequences of Sheep and Goat farming and of the Sheep and Goat premium system
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Landwirtschaft und Ländliche Entwicklung, Brüssel
Year: 2006
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 30-CE-0042768/00-19
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: Rural developmentAnimal breedingrural developmentenvironmental compatibility
Subject: Agricultural policy. Agricultural development
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu)
Title: Evaluation of the European Union’s Co-operation with Timor-Leste (2008 - 2013) : Final Report ; Volume 1
Title (other): Evaluation of the European Union’s Co-operation with Timor-Leste (2008 - 2013) : Final Report ; Volume 2 | Fiche
Contradictoire : Evaluation of the European Union's Co-operation with Timor-Leste 2008-2013
Abstract
Objective and scope of the evaluation: the objective of this country-level evaluation is to assess the European Union’s co-operation strategy with Timor-Leste over the period of the 10th EDF (2008-2013) while also taking account of co-operation efforts during the previous period (2006-2007). It focuses on the EU co-operation framework and all other official EU commitments to Timor-Leste apart from assistance from ECHO or initiatives undertaken by the European Investment Bank. It covers the focal sectors and areas in which the EU intervenes (institutional capacity-building, peace and stability, rural development, rehabilitation, health, support for state-building, food security, and support for Non-State Actors).[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
ACRONYMS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
SUMÁRIO EXECUTIVO
1. INTRODUCTION
2. CONTEXT OF THE EVALUATION
3. METHODOLOGY
4. EVALUATION FINDINGS
4.1 EQ1 STRATEGIC RELEVANCE OF EU CO-OPERATION
4.2 EQ2 STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS
4.3 EQ3 EU PROCESSES AND CAPACITIES
4.4 EQ4 AID MODALITIES AND INSTRUMENTS
4.5 EQ5 FOCAL SECTORS AND SUSTAINABLEDEVELOPMENT
4.6 EQ6 SUPPORTING TIMOR-LESTE THROUGHCROSS-CUTTING ISSUES
4.7 EQ7 STATE-BUILDING AND GOVERNANCE
4.8 EQ8 EU AND CIVIL SOCIETY ORGANISATIONS
4.9 EQ9 A CO-OPERATION CONTRIBUTING TO CHANGES
5. CONCLUSIONS
6. RECOMMENDATIONS
LIST OF FIGURES
LIST OF TABLES
LIST OF ANNEXES (VOLUME 2)
ANNEX 1: TERMS OF REFERENCES
ANNEX 2: BIBLIOGRAPHY
ANNEX 3: EVALUATION MATRIX
ANNEX 4: LIST OF PERSONS MET
ANNEX 5: INVENTORY METHODOLOGY AND ANALYSIS
ANNEX 6: LIST OF EUROPEAID INTERVENTIONS IN TIMOR-LESTE
ANNEX 7: LIST OF ECHO INTERVENTIONS IN TIMOR-LESTE
ANNEX 8: ROM ANALYSIS
ANNEX 9: METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH
ANNEX 10: INTERVENTION LOGIC
ANNEX 11: NATIONAL CONTEXT ANNEX
ANNEX 12: EU APPROACH TO CIVIL SOCIETY AS A DEVELOPMENT PARTNER
ANNEX 13: STAKEHOLDER PERCEPTION SURVEY
ANNEX 14: CASE STUDY – THE NEW DEAL
ANNEX 15: ANALYSIS THE LOCAL MEDIA ON EU’S CO-OPERATION WITH TIMOR-LESTE
ANNEX 16: MINUTES OF THE SEMINAR IN DILI
Author (Corp. Body): Lattanzio Advisory Public Sector | PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt, Freiburg im Breisgau | Ecorys, Rotterdam | MOKORO | European Centre for Development Policy Management
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Internationale Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung, Brüssel
Year: 2015
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Framework Contract No EVA 2011/Lot 3 | Specific Contract No 2013/328506
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationdevelopment aid policyEUpeacehealth care delivery systemrural developmentfoodstate machinery
stabilityEast-Timor
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesTimor Leste
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation de la coopération de l’Union européenne avec la République du Cameroun : Rapport de synthèse ; Volume 1
Title (other): Evaluation de la coopération de l’Union européenne avec la République du Cameroun : Rapport de synthèse ; Volume 2
| Evaluation de la Coopération de l’UE avec la République du Cameroun : "Fiche Contradictoire" | Grille de Qualite :
Evaluation de la coopération de l’UE avec la République du Cameroun ; Rapport final | Evaluation of the European
Union’s cooperation with the Republic of Cameroon : Executive Summary
Abstract
Les objectifs principaux de l’évaluation sont de:Rendre des comptes et fournir aux services de l'Union européenne (UE) ainsi qu'à un public plus large une évaluation indépendante et globale de ses relations de coopération et de partenariat passées et présentes avec la République du Cameroun;Identifier des leçons clés et formuler des recommandations en vue d'améliorer les stratégies, les programmes et les activités, actuelles et futures, de l'Union européenne.Le champ de l’étude couvre la période 2007-2012, ce qui correspond à la dernière année du 9ème Fonds européen de développement FED (2007) et le 10ème FED (2008-13) jusqu’en 2012. Cette évaluation prend aussi en compte, et évalue, les instruments de coopération de l’UE hors FED, notamment l’appui à la filière banane et l’appui à la société civile à travers les lignes thématiques. Les questions d’évaluation couvrent l’appui de l’UE dans les domaines de la justice, la gestion des finances publiques, la participation des organisations de la société civile (OSC), la gouvernance forestière, le sous-secteur des routes, le développement rural dans le Grand Nord et la filière bananière. Deux questions transversales sur la cohérence et la coordination sont aussi traitées. Les critères d’évaluation incluent la pertinence, l’efficacité, l’impact, la soutenabilité et la valeur ajoutée de l’UE.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Résumé exécutif
Executive summary
1 Introduction
1.1 Objectifs et champ de l’évaluation
1.2 Approche méthodologique
2 Contexte de la coopération de l’UE avec la République du Cameroun
2.1 Aperçu du contexte du pays
2.2 La coopération de l’Union européenne avec la République du Cameroun
2.3 Logique d’intervention reconstruite
3 Réponses aux questions d’évaluation
3.1 Question d’évaluation 1 – Secteur justice
3.2 Question d’évaluation 2 –Finances Publiques

3.3 Question d’évaluation 3 – Acteurs non-étatiques
3.4 Question d’évaluation 4 – Gouvernance forestière
3.5 Question d’évaluation 5 – Secteur routes
3.6 Question d’évaluation 6 – Secteur développement rural
3.7 Question d’évaluation 7 – Secteur bananier
3.8 Question d’évaluation 8 – Cohérence
3.9 Question d’évaluation 9 – Synergies, coordination et valeur ajoutée de l’UE
4 Conclusions
4.1 Cluster 1: Conclusions à un niveau stratégique
4.2 Cluster 2: Conclusions à un niveau programmatique
5 Recommandations
5.1 Cluster 1: Recommandations générales
5.2 Cluster 2: Recommandations spécifiques
Liste des tableaux
Liste des schémas
Liste des encadrés
Liste des acronymes et abréviations
| TABLE DES MATIERES
ANNEXE 1: MATRICE D'EVALUATION DETAILLEE
1 QUESTION D’EVALUATION 1-SECTEUR JUSTICE
2 QUESTION D’EVALUATION 2-FINANCES PUBLIQUES
3 QUESTION D’EVALUATION 3-ACTEURS NON-ETATIQUES
4 QUESTION D’EVALUATION 4–GOUVERNANCE FORESTIERE
5 QUESTION D’EVALUATION 5–SECTEUR ROUTES
6 QUESTION D’EVALUATION 6-SECTEUR DEVELOPPEMENTRURAL
7 QUESTION D’EVALUATION 7-SECTEUR BANANIER
8 QUESTION D’EVALUATION 8–COHERENCE
9 QUESTION D’EVALUATION 9-SYNERGIES, COORDINATION ET VALEUR AJOUTEE DE L’UE
ANNEXE 2: LISTE DETAILLEE DES INTERVENTIONS DE L’UE AU CAMEROUN (2007-2012)
ANNEXE 3: LISTE DES PERSONNES RENCONTREES PENDANT LA PHASE DE TERRAIN
Liste de tableaux
Liste des schémas
Liste des encadrés
Liste d’acronymes
Author (Corp. Body): PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt, Freiburg im Breisgau
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | DRN | European Centre for Development Policy Management | Ecorys, Rotterdam | Mokoro
Year: 2014
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contrat cadre N° EVA 2011/Lot 3 | Contrat spécifique N° 2012/305234
Language: en | fr
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationdevelopment aidEUfiscal policyforestryCamerooncooperationrural development
jurisdictiontrafficcivil society
Subject: Development aid. Aid programmes and aid organizationsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesCameroon
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of the Commission of the European Union’s Co-operation with Nepal : Country Level Evaluation ; Final Report
; Volume 1 – Main Report
Title (other): Evaluation of the Commission of the European Union’s Co-operation with Nepal : Country Level Evaluation ; Final Report
; Volume 2 – Annexes | "Fiche Contradictoire" : Evaluation of the Commission of the European Union’s Co-operation with
Nepal ; Country level evaluation | Quality Grid : Evaluation of the Commission of the European Union's Cooperation with
Nepal | Evaluation of the Commission of the European Union's Co-operation with Nepal : EVINFO
Abstract
The main objectives of the evaluation are: (i) to be accountable and to provide the relevant external co-operation services of the EC and the wider public with an overall independent assessment of the EC’s past and current co-operation relations with Nepal; and (ii) to identify key lessons in order to improve the current and future strategies and programmes of the EC.The evaluation covers aid delivery over the period 2002-2010 and mainly corresponds to the 2002-2006 strategic cycle (Country Strategy Paper) and the first National Indicative Plan of the 2007-2013 cycle. The evaluation is forward-looking and has paid specific attention to the following areas of co-operation: Support to Nepal’s poverty reduction strategy, particularly in (i) Education, (ii) Rural Development, (iii) Renewable Energy and the Environment, (iv) Peace Building and Consolidation of Democracy, and (v) Trade facilitation and integration in the international economy.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Executive summary
Executive summary – Nepali version
1 Introduction
2 Context of the evaluation
2.1 Evaluation Process and Methodology
2.2 Country context
2.3 EC Strategy in Nepal
3 Answers to the Evaluation Questions
3.1 EQ1 Social exclusion
3.2 EQ2 Democracy and the Rule of Law
3.3 EQ3 Education policy
3.4 EQ4 Access to education
3.5 EQ5 Trade-related assistance
3.6 EQ6 Rural development and food security
3.7 EQ7 Renewable energy and the environment
3.8 EQ8 Responsiveness
3.9 EQ9 Synergies
4 Conclusions
4.1 General conclusions
4.2 Specific conclusions
5 Recommendations
5.1 General recommendations
5.2 Specific recommendations
List of Figures
List of Tables
List of Abbreviations and Acronyms
| 1 Annex 1: Terms of Reference
2 Annex 2: Detailed information matrix
2.1 EQ1: Social exclusion
2.2 EQ2: Democracy and the Rule of Law
2.3 EQ3: Education policy
2.4 EQ4: Access to Education
2.5 EQ5: Trade
2.6 EQ6: Rural development and food security
2.7 EQ7: Renewable energy and the environment
2.8 EQ8: Responsiveness
2.9 EQ9: Synergies
3 Annex 3: Detailed country context
3.1 The Country and its people
3.2 Political situation
3.3 Economic situation
3.4 Social situation
3.5 Environment
3.6 The development priorities of the Government
3.7 The Donor community in Nepal
4 Annex 4: Detailed list of EC interventions in Nepal (2002-2010)
5 Annex 5: Power point presentation with main results of the evaluation
6 Annex 6: Evaluation methodology
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Evaluation process
6.3 Identification of the Evaluation Questions
6.4 Data collection
7 Annex 7: List of institutions and persons met
8 Annex 8: List of documents
9 Annex 9: Minutes of the in-country seminar
10 Annex 10: Map of Nepal
Author (Corp. Body): PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt, Freiburg im Breisgau
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | DRN | ADE | Overseas Development Institute, London | Instituto Complutense de Estudios Internacionales, Madrid | European Institute for Asian S
Year: 2012
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: EuropeAid/122888/C/SER/Multi
Language: en | nep
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationeducationdemocratizationdevelopment aidrenewable energyEUguarantee of peacecommerce
international economic relationsrural developmentNepalenvironment
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesNepal
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of the European Commission’s Cooperation with the Philippines : Final Report ; Volume 1
Title (other): Evaluation of the European Commission’s Cooperation with the Philippines : Final Report ; Volume 2 | Fiche
Contradictoire : Evaluation of the Commission’s support to the Philippines ; Ref. Ares(2013)2946473 | Quality Grid :
Philippines Country Level Evaluation ; Final Report, June 2011 | Evaluation of the European Commission cooperation with
the Philippines : Summary of the main conclusions and recommendations ; Ref. Ares(2012)338875
Abstract
The evaluation of the Commission’s co-operation with the Philippines is part of the 2009 evaluation programme as approved by External Relations and Development Commissioners and aiming at ensuring accountability for the management of the allocated funds as well as promoting a lesson-learning culture throughout the organisation.The main objectives of the evaluation are: to provide the relevant external co-operation services of the European Commission and the wider public with an overall independent assessment of the Commission’s past and current cooperation relations with the Philippines (2002-2009); and to identify key lessons in order to improve the current and future strategies and programmes of the Commission.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
1 Introduction
1.1 Purpose of the evaluation
1.2 Evaluation Process
2 Country Context
3 EU Strategic Objectives and Priorities in the Philippines
3.1 Global EU development policy strategic objectives and priorities
3.2 ALA regulations (1996-2006)
3.3 DCI regulations (2007-2013)
3.4 Regional strategic objectives and priorities
3.5 EU Strategic Objectives and Priorities in the Philippines: Overview
3.6 The First Country Strategy Paper, 2002-2006
3.7 The Second Country Strategy Paper 2007-2013
3.8 Regional programmes in the Philippines
3.9 Thematic / horizontal funding in the Philippines
3.10 Partnership Cooperation Agreement
3.11 Detailed Intervention Logic
4 Findings
4.1 EQ1 – To what extent has the EU cooperation programme in the Philippines been designed and implemented with a view to addressing the needs of the poorest/vulnerable groups?
4.1.1 Findings by JC
4.1.2 Synthesised EQ Answer:
4.1.3 Conclusions:
4.1.4 Recommendations:
4.2 EQ2 – To what extent has EU support to the Philippine Health Sector Programme contributed to an improved provision of basic health care services?
4.2.1 Findings by JC:
4.2.2 Synthesised EQ Answer:
4.2.3 Conclusions:
4.2.4 Recommendations
4.3 EQ3 – To what extent has EU support in the area of rural development contributed to improved living standards for the poor?
4.3.1 Findings by JC:
4.3.2 Synthesised EQ Answer
4.3.3 Conclusions
4.3.4 Recommendations
4.4 EQ4 – To what extent has EU support contributed to improved trade and economic partnership with the Philippines and the country’s further integration into the international trade system?
| 4.4.1 Findings by JC:
4.4.2 Synthesised EQ Answer:
4.4.3 Conclusions
4.4.4 Recommendations
4.5 EQ5 – To what extent has the EU support promoted and strengthened better governance?
4.5.1 Findings by JC:
4.5.2 Progress made in the major clusters supported through EU programmes
4.5.3 Conclusions:
4.5.4 Recommendations:
4.6 EQ6 – To what extent was the EU’s mix of financing instruments and aid modalities appropriate to the national context and EU cooperation objectives?
4.6.1 Findings by JC:
4.6.2 Synthesised EQ Answer:
4.6.3 Conclusions
4.6.4 Recommendations:
5 General Conclusions and Recommendations
Volume II
Annex 1: List of Documents Consulted
Annex 2: Overview of Evaluation Questions
Annex 3: List of contacts
3.1. List of contacts for the field phase
3.2. List of people met during the field phase
Annex 4: Country Context
| Annex 5: EU Strategic Objectives and Priorities in the Philippines
5.1. Global EU development policy strategic objectives and priorities
5.2. ALA regulations (1996-2006)
5.3. DCI regulations (2007-2013)
5.4. Regional strategic objectives and priorities
5.5. EU Strategic Objectives and Priorities in the Philippines: Overview
5.6.The First Country Strategy Paper, 2002-2006
5.7. The Second Country Strategy Paper 2007-2013
5.8. Regional programmes in the Philippines
5.9. Thematic / horizontal funding in the Philippines
Annex 6: Information Matrix
EQ1 Poverty/Vulnerable Groups - To what extent has the EU cooperation programme in the Philippines been designed and implemented with a view to addressing the needs of the poorest/vulnerable groups?
EQ2 Health - To what extent has EU support to the Philippine Health Sector Programme contributed to an improved provision of basic health care services?
EQ3 Rural Development - To what extent has EU support in the area of rural development contributed to improved living standards for the poor?
EQ4 Trade - To what extent has EU support contributed to improved trade and economic partnership with the Philippines and the country’s further integration into the international trade system?
EQ5 Governance - To what extent has the EU support promoted and strengthened better governance?
EQ6 Mix of Instruments - To what extent was the EU’s mix of financing instruments and aid modalities appropriate to the national context and EU cooperation objectives?
Annex 7: Geography of the European Commission’s interventions in the Philippines
Annex 8: Overview of evaluation methodology
8.1. Tools for the Inception Phase
8.2. Tools for the desk phase
8.3. Tools for the field phase
8.4. The synthesis phase
Annex 9: Summary of Seminar in the Philippines
Annex 10: Terms of References
Author (Corp. Body): PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt, Freiburg im Breisgau
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | DRN | Aide a? la De?cision Economique, Ottignies Louvain la Neuve | Overseas Development Institute, London | EURASIA | Instituto C
Year: 2011
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: EuropeAid/122888/C/SER/Multi | 2009/223108 | Ref. Ares(2013)2946473
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: povertyevaluationdevelopment aidEUEuropean Commissionfinancial assistancehealth care delivery systemgovernance
commercecooperationrural developmentPhilippineseconomic policy
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesPhilippines
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation de la coopération de l’Union européenne avec le Burkina Faso : Evaluation de niveau national ; Rapport
Final ; Volume 1 – Rapport Principal
Title (other): Evaluation de la coopération de l'Union européenne avec le Burkina Faso : Evaluation de niveau national ; Rapport
Final ; Volume 2 – Annexes | Evaluation de la Coopération de l'UE avec le Burkina Faso : Fiche contradictoire |
Evaluation de la stratégie de la CE au Burkina Faso : Grille de Qualité du Rapport Final | Evaluation de la
Coopération de l 'UE avec le Burkina Faso de 1999 à 2008 : ref. 1275 : EVINFO
Abstract
This report presents the results of the evaluation of the European Union’s cooperation strategy in Burkina Faso between 1999 and 2008. The main objectives of the evaluation are to provide the EU departments concerned and the general public with a global and independent appraisal of past and present EU cooperation with Burkina Faso. The evaluation identifies the main lessons learned from this cooperation with a view to improving the current and future strategies and programmes of the EU.The scope of the evaluation covers the programming and implementation of the 8th and 9th EDFs. Reference is made to the 10th EDF, in order to put the results of the evaluation into perspective in terms of conclusions and operational recommendations.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
RESUME
Summary
1 Introduction
1.1 Cadre, objectif et champ de l’évaluation
1.1.1 Cadre de l’évaluation
1.1.2 Objectif de l’évaluation
1.1.3 Champ de l’évaluation
1.2 Structure du rapport
1.3 Méthodologie de l’évaluation
1.3.1 Phases successives d’évaluation
1.3.2 Schéma de la logique de l’intervention de l’Uni on européenne
1.3.3 Questions d’évaluation, critères de jugement et indicateurs
1.3.4 Processus de collecte et d'analyse des données et démarche de jugement appliquée
1.3.5 Limites du processus de collecte et analyse des données et des jugements
2 CONTEXTE GLOBAL DE LA COOPERATION CE-BURKINA FASO
2.1 Contexte politique, économique, social et culturel
2.2 Politique du Gouvernement
2.2.1 La Stratégie de développement du Burkina Faso
2.2.2 Rapport national sur les OMD
2.3 Aide au développement 1999-2008 et principaux bailleurs
2.4 Stratégie de coopération au développement de l’UE au Burkina Faso
2.4.1 Documents de stratégie pays (DSP) et programme indicatif national (PIN)
2.4.2 Stratégie de Coopération Régionale
2.4.3 La logique générale d’intervention de l’aide programmable des PIN
2.5 Moyens d’aide disponibles et employés pour la mise en œuvre de la stratégie
2.6 Autres interventions communautaires et articulation à l’aide programmable de niveau national
3 REPONSES AUX QUESTIONS EVALUATIVES
3.1 Pertinence
3.1.1 Les interventions de l’aide européenne sont concordantes avec les priorités gouvernementales énoncées dans les documents de programmation (CJ 1.1)
3.1.2 Les bénéficiaires ont été impliqués dans la dé finition des objectifs sectoriels (CJ 1.2)
3.1.3 Réponse à la Question évaluative
3.2 Secteur transports
3.2.1 Les interventions de l’UE (i) ont amélioré l’état des routes du réseau prioritaire sur les axes internationaux et intérieurs, et de ce fait (ii) dimi nué les coûts de transports et les temps de parcours (CJ 2.1)
| 3.2.2 Les interventions de l’Union améliorent la sécurité routière (CJ 2.2)
3.2.3 Les interventions de l’UE ont participé à augmenter les échanges commerciaux nationaux et internationaux (CJ 2.3)
3.2.4 Le dispositif institutionnel promu par les interventions de l’UE a augmenté durablement les capacités des acteurs de l’entretien routier et les ressources financières qui lui sont dédiées (CJ 2.4)
3.2.5 Les interventions de l’UE dans le secteur des transports ont amélioré la visibilité de l’UE auprès des acteurs (CJ 2.5)
3.2.6 Les interventions de l’UE dans le secteur des transports ont amélioré l’accessibilité aux services sociaux (CJ 2.6)
3.2.7 Réponse à la Question évaluative 2
3.3 Appuis macroéconomiques
3.3.1 L’aide budgétaire de l’UE a amélioré la qualité et la quantité du financement extérieur du Burkina Faso (CJ 3.1)
3.3.2 Les interventions en matière d’appui macroéconomique de l’UE ont contribué à l’amélioration de la gestion des finances publiques (CJ 3.2)
3.3.3 L’intervention de l’UE a contribué à l’amélioration des services sociaux de base (CJ 3.3)
3.3.4 Les interventions des partenaires en matière d’aide budgétaire, y compris celles de l’UE, ont contribué à l’amélioration de la stabilité macroéconomique et à la réduction de la pauvreté (CJ 3.4)
3.3.5 Réponse à la Question évaluative 3
3.4 Développement rural et de sécurité alimentaire
3.4.1 Développement rural (CJ 4.1)
3.4.2 La sécurité alimentaire (CJ 4.2)
3.4.3 Réponse à la Question évaluative 4
3.5 Eau et assainissement
3.5.1 L’intervention européenne a permis d’améliorer l’approvisionnement en eau potable et l’accès à l’assainissement des populations défavorisées (CJ 5.1)
3.5.2 L’intervention européenne a permis d’améliorer la situation sanitaire dans les zones d’intervention (CJ 5.2)
3.5.3 Les installations financées sont toujours fonctionnelles (CJ 5.3)
3.5.4 Réponse à la Question évaluative 5
3.6 Culture
| 3.10.2 Les interventions de l’UE sont menées en coordination avec la politique nationale et les interventions des autres PTF (CJ10.2)
3.10.3 Réponse à la Question évaluative 10
3.11 Questions transversales
3.11.1 Les interventions de l’UE ont intégré la dimension environnementale, genre, VIH/SIDA et droit de l’homme (CJ 11.1)
3.11.2 Les interventions de l’UE ont contribué à améliorer le degré et les modalités de prise en compte de ces questions transversales par le gouvernement (CJ 11.2)
3.11.3 Réponse à la Question évaluative 11
4 CONCLUSIONS
4.1 Conclusions générales
4.1.1 La pertinence de l’approche stratégique et des interventions
4.1.2 L’efficacité de l’aide dans les différents secteurs ’intervention
4.1.3 L’efficience des interventions
4.1.4 Les effets (impacts) et la viabilité des interventions
4.2 Conclusions spécifiques (CS) à chaque question d’évaluation
5 RECOMMANDATIONS
5.1 Recommandations de portée générale
5.2 Recommandations spécifiques concernant les interventions dans le secteur des transports et infrastructures routières
5.3 Recommandations spécifiques concernant l’appui budgétaire
5.4 Recommandations spécifiques ayant trait aux interventions dans le secteur du développement rural et de la sécurité alimentaire
5.5 Recommandations spécifiques ayant trait aux interventions dans le secteur eau et assainissement
5.6 Recommandations spécifiques concernant les interventions dans le secteur « Culture »
5.7Recommandations spécifiques concernant les interventions dans le secteur privé
| 3.6.1 Le nombre d’acteurs non étatiques appuyé (nouveaux ou existants) est significatif (CJ 6.1)
3.6.2 Les acteurs non étatiques appuyés sont viables et peuvent exercer leur influence de manière durable + impact sur l'économie et l'emploi (CJ 6.2)
3.6.3 Réponse à la Question évaluative 6
3.7 Secteur privé et intégration régionale
3.7.1 Le secteur privé est renforcé et constitue un réel moteur du développement économique (CJ 7.1)
3.7.2 Améliorations constatées en matière législative (CJ 7.2)
3.7.3 Un secteur productif plus compétitif à l’international (CJ 7.3)
3.7.4 Réponse à la Question évaluative 7
3.8 Efficience
3.8.1 Pour les différents outils utilisés, les décisions prises , les moyens mis en place et les résultats obtenus sont effectifs dans des délais raisonnables et correspondant aux besoins des bénéficiaires (CJ 8.1)
3.8.2 Adéquation des ressources utilisées par rapport aux résultats obtenus, pour les différents instruments utilisés (analyse comparative des différents outils financiers) (CJ 8.2)
3.8.3 Réponse à la Question évaluative 8
3.9 Bonne gouvernance
3.9.1 La perception du pays est bonne (CJ 9.1)
3.9.2 L’Union européenne participe activement au renforcement des capacités nationales (CJ 9.2)
3.9.3 Les interventions de l’Union européenne en matière de renforcement des capacités sont efficaces et une amélioration est constatée dans les performances des organisations touchées (CJ 9.3)
3.9.4 Les interventions de l’Union européenne ont contribué à une meilleure gouvernance sectorielle (CJ 9.4)
3.9.5 Réponse à la Question évaluative 9
3.10 Cohérence, complémentarité et coordination (3C)
3.10.1 Les effets attendus des interventions de l’Union européenne sont complémentaires et additionnels aux effets des interventions des autres PTF dont les interventions des Etats membres. (CJ10.1)
| Volume II
ANNEXE 1 TERMES DE RÉFÉRENCES
ANNEXE 2 LOGIQUE D’INTERVENTION ET STRATÉGIE DE LA CE ET PRÉSENTATIONS SECTORIELLES
ANNEXE 2.1 DOCUMENTS DE POLITIQUE EUROPEENNE POUR LA COOPERATION AU DEVELOPPEMENT
ANNEXE 2.2 LOGIQUE D’INTERVENTION DE LA CE AU BURKINA FASO
ANNEXE 2.3 DONNEES QUANTITATIVES COMPLEMENTAIRES SUR LA COOPERATION CE – BURKINA FASO
ANNEXE 2.4 STRATEGIE MISE EN ŒUVRE PAR MACRO-SECTEUR/THEME DU DSP
1. INFRASTRUCTURES ET TRANSPORTS
2. DEVELOPPEMENT RURAL ET SECURITE ALIMENTAIRE
3. EAU ET ASSAINISSEMENT
ANNEXE 3 INVENTAIRE DES PROJETS ET PROGRAMMES AU BURKINA FASO
1. INVENTAIRE 7E FED(À PARTIR DE 1999)
2. INVENTAIRE 8E FED
3. INVENTAIRE 9E FED
4. INVENTAIRE 10E FED
5. LIGNES BUDGETAIRES
ANNEXE 4 MÉTHODOLOGIE DE L’ÉVALUATION
ANNEXE 4.1 PHASES SUCCESSIVES D’EVALUATION
ANNEXE 4.2 DU SCHEMA DE LA LOGIQUE DE L’INTERVENTION DE LA CE AUX QUESTIONS D’EVALUATION ET CRITERES DE JUGEMENT
ANNEXE 4.3 PROCESSUS DE COLLECTE ET D'ANALYSE DES DONNEES ET DEMARCHE DE JUGEMENT APPLIQUE
1. METHODES DE COLLECTE DE DONNEES
2. METHODES D’ANALYSE DES DONNEES
3. DEMARCHE DE JUGEMENT
4. LIMITES DU PROCESSUS DE COLLECTE ET ANALYSE DES DONNEES ET DES JUGEMENTS
ANNEXE 4.4 APERÇU GLOBAL DES QUESTIONS EVALUATIVES, CRITERES DE JUGEMENT ET INDICATEURS UTILISES ET DES METHODES EMPLOYEES
1. PERTINENCE
2. TRANSPORTS
3. APPUI MACROECONOMIQUE
4. DEVELOPPEMENT RURAL ET SECURITE ALIMENTAIRE
5. EAU ET ASSAINISSEMENT
6. CULTURE
7. SECTEUR PRIVE
8. EFFICIENCE
9. GOUVERNANCE
10. 3C
11. QUESTIONS TRANSVERSALES
| ANNEXE 5 MATRICE D’EVALUATION
ANNEXE 5.1 PERTINENCE
ANNEXE 5.2 SECTEUR TRANSPORTS
ANNEXE 5.3 APPUIS MACROECONOMIQUES
ANNEXE 5.4 DEVELOPPEMENT RURAL ET DE SECURITE ALIMENTAIRE
ANNEXE 5.5 EAU ET ASSAINISSEMENT
ANNEXE 5.6 CULTURE
ANNEXE 5.7 SECTEUR PRIVE ET INTEGRATION REGIONALE
ANNEXE 5.8 EFFICIENCE
ANNEXE 5.9 BONNE GOUVERNANCE
ANNEXE 5.10 COHERENCE, COMPLEMENTARITE ET COORDINATION (3C)
ANNEXE 5.11 QUESTIONS TRANSVERSALES
ANNEXE 6 FICHES D’ÉVALUATION DE PROGRAMMES/PROJETS
ANNEXE 7 INDICATEURS DE SUIVI DE L’AIDE BUDGÉTAIRE
ANNEXE 8 DONNÉES ÉCONOMIQUES ET SOCIALES DU PAYS
ANNEXE 8.1 SITUATION POLITIQUE, ECONOMIQUE ET SOCIALE DU PAYS
ANNEXE 8.2 DONNEES STATISTIQUES DU PAYS
ANNEXE 9 BAILLEURS ET APD AU BURKINA FASO
ANNEXE 10 BIBLIOGRAPHIE
ANNEXE 11 LISTE DES PERSONNES RENCONTRÉES
ANNEXE 12 CALENDRIER DE LA MISSION DE TERRAIN
ANNEXE 13 COMPTES RENDUS DES « FOCUS GROUPS »
ANNEXE 13.1 FOCUS GROUP SUR L’AIDE BUDGETAIRE DE LA CE
ANNEXE 13.2 FOCUS GROUP DANS LE SECTEUR DE LA CULTURE
ANNEXE 13.3 REUNION AVEC LES ACTEURS DU PRCE
ANNEXE 13.4 REUNION AVEC LE COMITE DE COORDINATION DU PROGRAMME QUALITE
Author: Adolehoume, Amakoe
Contributer: ECO Consult
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Auswärtige Beziehungen | Arbeitsgemeinschaft Entwicklungspolitischer Gutachter | APRI |
Year: 2010
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contrat n° EVA 2007/geo-acp | ref. 1275
Language: fr
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationBurkina Fasodevelopment aidEUcooperationculturerural developmentmacroeconomics
foodprivate sectorregional integrationrelevancetrafficadministrationeconomics of water supply and distribution
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesBurkina Faso
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Joint Evaluation of the Cooperation of the European Commission, Belgium, Denmark, France and Luxembourg with Niger
between 2000 - 2008 : Final report ; Volume 1 – Main report ; Second revised edition
Title (other): Evaluation conjointe de la cooperation de la Commission Europeenne, de la Belgique, du Danemark, de la France et du
Luxembourg avec le Niger 2000-2008 : Rapport final ; Volume 2 - Annexes | Annexe 3 – Logiques d'intervention |
Evaluation conjointe de la cooperation de la Commission Europeenne, de la Belgique, du Danemark, de la France et du
Luxembourg avec le Niger 2000-2008 : Rapport final ; Annexe 7 - Rapports sectoriels et thématiques | Evaluation
conjointe de la cooperation de la Commission Europeenne, de la Belgique, du Danemark, de la France et du Luxembourg avec
le Niger 2000-2008 : Rapport final ; Volume 1 – Rapport principal | Evaluation conjointe de la coopération de la
Commission européenne, de la Belgique, du Danemark, de la France et du Luxembourg avec le Niger - 2000 à 2008 : Ref.
1278 ; EVINFO
Abstract
In 2007, five donors (European Commission, Belgium, Denmark, France and Luxembourg) decided to work together to evaluate their cooperation with Niger over the 2000-2008 period. Together, the five Donors taking part in the evaluation (DPE) accounted for more than half the Official Development Assistance (ODA) delivered to Niger over the period.Because it is a joint evaluation, specific aspects had to be taken into account: the aim was not to assess the individual performance of each DPE but to analyse the conception, implementation and effects of their joint action. Two analytical frameworks have been used to achieve this:An analysis of the implementation of the Paris Declaration Commitments, focusing on the cooperation process, and the relationship between the aid partners in particular (DPE-Government on the one hand, between DPEs on the other).The evaluation criteria of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC), which help assess the collective performance of DPEs by analysing their aims, resources, achievements, results and impacts.The evaluation is structured on the basis of these two analysis frameworks. It deals with the strategic cooperation frameworks between each DPE and the Government of Niger, as well as their priorities and interventions in a selection of sectors (rural development, water and sanitation, transport, culture, craft industry, health, education and training, macroeconomic support), taking into account cross-cutting issues (regional development, environment, gender issues, demographics and youth issues). The evaluation is also based on an extensive document review, field visits to selected sites in Niger, and on a survey about the perception of development aid in Niger, led concomitantly by the Laboratory for the Study and Research on Social Dynamics and Local Development (LASDEL). [Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
LIST OF ACRONYMS
SUMMARY
1. MANDATE OF THE EVALUATION
1.1. A joint evaluation
1.2. Scope of evaluation1.3. Evaluation monitoring
1.4. Parallel perception survey by LASDEL
2. METHODOLOGY
2.1. Strengths of the evaluation
2.2. Weaknesses of the evaluation
3. DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES IN NIGER
3.1. Geography and climate
3.1.1. A vast, land-locked country bordered by Nigeria
3.1.2. A harsh, instable and deteriorating agro-climatic context
3.2. Population and poverty
3.2.1. One of the highest population growth rates in the world
3.2.2. Chronic food insecurity
3.2.3. One of the poorest populations in the world, facing a worsening situation
3.2.4. Rural economy in permanent crisis
3.2.5. Mining products, an asset which is still not used to its full potential
3.2.6. A very low level of education
3.2.7. Less developed migration trends than in some other Sahelian countries
3.2.8. Niger belongs to a solid monetary area... Is it too solid?
3.2.9. Close economic integration with Nigeria and other coastal countries
3.2.10. Economic integration hindered by an insufficient transport network
3.3. The Nigerien State
3.3.1. The political stability experienced during the period of evaluation has recently been undermined
3.3.2. A decentralisation process which is still in its early stages and not very advanced
3.3.3. A better controlled State budget, but which still depends a lot on foreign aid
3.3.4. More formal policies
3.4. SWOT analysis
4. GOVERNMENT STRATEGIES AND DPE RESPONSES
4.1. Niger’s Poverty Reduction Strategy, a framework to adapt to development challenges
4.2. General strategies of the DPEs with Niger
4.2.1. Belgium
4.2.2. European Commission
4.2.3. France
4.2.4. Denmark
4.2.5. Luxembourg
4.3. Financial commitments of the DPEs in Niger
4.3.1. Weight of aid granted by DPEs in Niger
4.3.2. Regional distribution of aid by the DPEs in Niger
| 4.3.3. Sectoral distribution of aid by the DPEs in Niger
5. ANALYSIS
5.1. An approach based on 11 evaluation questions
5.2. Two complementary analysis frameworks
5.3. First analysis framework: Implementation of the Paris Declaration Commitments
5.3.1. Paris Declaration: implied hypotheses
5.3.2. The concept of cooperation area
5.3.3. The cooperation cycle
5.3.4. What deductions can be made regarding the Paris Declaration Commitments?
5.4. Second analysis framework: the DAC evaluation criteria
5.4.1. Relevance
5.4.2. Coherence
5.4.3. Effectiveness
5.4.4. Impact
5.4.5. Sustainability
5.4.6. Efficiency
6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
| Volume II: Annexes
ANNEXE 1. TERMES DE RÉFÉRENCE
ANNEXE 2. METHODOLOGIE ET CONCEPTS
ANNEXE 3. LOGIQUES D’INTERVENTION
ANNEXE 4. LES ENJEUX DE DEVELOPPEMENT DU NIGER
ANNEXE 5. ENGAGEMENTS FINANCIERS DES DPE AU NIGER : ANALYSE SECTORIELLE ET REGIONALE
ANNEXE 6. AUTRES COOPERATIONS SIGNIFICATIVES AU NIGER
ANNEXE 7. RAPPORTS SECTORIELS
ANNEXE 8. REPONSE AUX QUESTIONS D’EVALUATION
ANNEXE 9. FOCUS GROUPS ORGANISES DANS LE CADRE DE LA MISSION DE TERRAIN
ANNEXE 10. BIBLIOGRAPHIE
ANNEXE 11. MEMBRE DE L’EQUIPE DE CONSULTANTS ET DU COMITE DE GESTION
Author (Corp. Body): Société d’Etudes et d’Evaluation sarl
Contributer: Europäische Kommission | Belgien | Dänemark | Frankreich | Luxembourg | baastel | Institut de Recherches dApplications des Me?thodes de De?veloppement, Paris | Dnet Consult
Year: 2010
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Ref. 1278
Language: en | fr
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: trainingBelgiumevaluationeducationDenmarkdemographydevelopment aidEU
European CommissionFrancegender mainstreaminghealth policyhandicraft tradeyouth policycooperationculturerural developmentLuxembourg
macroeconomicsNigerenvironmental policytrafficeconomics of water supply and distribution
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesDenmarkBelgiumFranceLuxembourgNiger
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
1 | 2
« Previous
Next »
Copyright (C) 2003-2019 European Documentation Centres / Update: 09.10.2019