Suche nach Schlagworten '00005241'

4 entries found on 1 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 4

Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),

« Previous
Next »
Title: Thematic evaluation of the European Commission support to the health sector : Final Report ; Volume I
Title (other): Thematic evaluation of the European Commission support to the health sector : Final Report ; Volume IIa | Thematic
evaluation of the European Commission support to the health sector : Final Report ; Volume IIb | Thematic evaluation of
the European Commission support to the health sector : Final Report ; Volume IIc | Thematic evaluation of the European
Commission support to the health sector : Final Report ; Volume IId | Thematic evaluation of the European Commission
support to the health sector : Final Report ; Volume IIe | Fiche Contradictoire : Thematic evaluation of the European
Commission support to the health sector ; Ref. Ares(2014)2001203 | Quality Grid : Thematic evaluation of the European
Commission's support to the health sector ; Final Report (August 2012) | Evaluation of the EU Support of the Health
Sector : Ref. 1308 ; EVINFO
Abstract
This final report presents the outcome of the “Thematic evaluation of EC support to the health sector”. It was commissioned by the Evaluation Unit of DG DEVCO and implemented between January 2011 and May 2012.The evaluation provides an independent assessment of the European Commission’s (EC’s) past and current support to the health sector by looking at the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability of the EC support provided. It also assesses the coherence of EC health support with other EC/European Union (EU) and donor policies and activities, as well as the specific EC added value within the health sector. The evaluation ultimately aims at identifying relevant key lessons, in order to provide recommendations for future EC support.The evaluation covers EC aid delivery over the period 2002 to 2010, including all geographical programmes (EDF, DCI, ENPI and predeces-sors) and thematic budget lines. It comprises all countries under the mandate of DG DEVCO and assesses every aid modality used in the health sector, including Sector Budget Support (SBS) and General Budget Support (GBS), as well as funds channelled through multilateral organisations or global initiatives, such as the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM) or the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (GAVI).[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
1 Introduction
1.1 Overall objective and scope of the evaluation
1.2 Structure of the final report
2 Methodology
2.1 Key steps of the evaluation process
2.2 Challenges and limitations
3 Background and context of EC support to the health sector
3.1 Current international development co-operation and health sector framework
3.2 EC strategy and support to the health sector over the period 2002-2010
4 Inventory: Overview on EC resources to support health
4.1 EC support to health between 2002 and 2010: Global overview
4.2 Direct support to the health sector
4.3 EC ‘indirect’ support to the health sector: General Budget Support
5 Answers to the Evaluation Questions
5.1 EQ1: To what extent has EC support contributed to enhancing the quality of health services?
5.2 EQ2: To what extent has EC support to health contributed to increasing affordability of health care, especially for the poor?
5.3 EQ3: To what extent has EC support contributed to improving geographical availability of health facilities especially for the poor?
5.4 EQ4: To what extent has EC support to health contributed to improving health service utilisation related to MNCH?
5.5 EQ5- To what extent has EC support to health contributed to strengthening the management and governance of the health system?
5.6 EQ 6: To what extent and how has the EC contributed to strengthening government-led co-ordination, complementarity and synergies with Member States and other donors in the health sector, in line with the Paris Declaration? (national, regional and global levels)
5.7 EQ7: To what extent have the various financing modalities (GBS, SBS, other sector support, projects), funding channels and instruments and their combinations, been appropriate, thus contributing to improving access to, equity of and policy-based resource allocation in health?
5.8 Overall assessment of EC strategy
6 Conclusions and recommendations
6.1 Conclusions
6.2 Recommendations
List of tables
| VOLUME IIa: DETAILED PRELIMINARY ANSWERS TO THE EVALUATION QUESTIONS
Annex 1: Detailed preliminary answers to the Evaluation Questions
VOLUME IIB : MAIN INDIVIDUAL ANALYSIS
Annex 2: Inventory
Annex 3: Results of survey to EU Delegations
Annex 4: CSP analysis
Volume IIc: Country case studies and thematic case studies Country case studies
Annex 5: Burkina Faso
Annex 6: Democratic Republic of Congo
Annex 7: Ghana
Annex 8: South Africa
Annex 9: Zambia
Annex 10: Egypt
Annex 11: Moldova
Volume IId: Country case studies and thematic case studies (continued)
Annex 12: Afghanistan
Annex 13: Bangladesh
Annex 14: Philippines
Annex 15: Lao PDR
Annex 16: Ecuador
Thematic case studies
Annex 17: The European Commission and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM)
Annex 18: EC support to the health sector in fragile states
Annex 19: The European Commission and Global Public Goods (GPG) for Health
Volume IIe: Terms of References, Definitions and Methodological remarks, References
Annex 20: Terms of References
Annex 21: Evaluation Matrix
Annex 22: Methodology and tools used for the evaluation
Annex 23: Overview of sources used per indicator
Annex 24: Selection criteria and ranking for the 12 country case studies
Annex 25: Overview of selected interventions in the 12 case study countries
Annex 26: Overview of Budget Support operations in the 25 desk study countries
Annex 27: Statistical tables
Annex 28: Specific features of EC support to health in partner country regions
Annex 29: Consideration of cross-cutting issues in EC policies to the health sector
Annex 30: List of People Interviewed
Annex 31: Documents consulted
Author (Corp. Body): PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt, Freiburg im Breisgau
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Egeval II | DRN | Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, Berlin | European Centre for Development Policy Management | Overseas
Year: 2012
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: EuropeAid/122888/C/SER/Multi | Contract n° EVA 2007/social LOT2 | Ares(2014)2001203 | Ref. 1308
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EgyptAfghanistanAIDSBangladeshevaluationBurkina FasoEcuadordevelopment aid
EUhealth policyGhanavaccinationCongoLaosPhilippinesRepublic of South AfricaZambia
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relationsMedical care. Health control
Countries Scheme: Global ResourcesEurope. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of EC co-operation with the LAO PDR : Final Report ; Volume 1
Title (other): Evaluation of EC co-operation with the LAO PDR : Final Report ; Volume 2 | Evaluation of European Commission’s
Cooperation with ASEAN : Country Level Evaluation ; Final Report | Fiche Contradictoire : Evaluation of the Commission's
support to the LAO PDR | Quality Grid : Evaluation of the Commission's cooperation with Laos ; Country Level Evaluation
| Evaluation of the Commission’s support to the LAO PDR : Ref. 1261 ; EVINFO
Abstract
The overall purpose of this evaluation is to ensure accountability for the use of allocated resources as well as to promote a lesson-learning culture in EC development cooperation. The main specific objectives of the evaluation were: •to provide the relevant external co-operation services of the EC and the wider public with an overall independent assessment of the Commission’s past and current cooperation relations with the Lao PDR; •to identify key lessons in order to improve the current and future strategies and programmes of the Commission.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
1 Introduction
1.1 FRAMEWORK OF THE EVALUATION
1.2 METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH
2 Development Co-operation Context
2.1 OVERVIEW
2.2 CONTEXT AND NATIONAL PRIORITIES2.3 TRADE
2.4 INVESTMENT
2.5 POVERTY
2.6 THE SOCIAL SECTOR: HEALTH AND EDUCATION
2.7 ENVIRONMENT
2.8 GOVERNANCE
2.9 HUMAN RIGHTS
3 EC Support to LAO PDR
3.1 THE OVERALL CONTEXT
3.2 EC STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES AND PRIORITIES IN LAO PDR
3.2.1 EC-Lao PDR Cooperation Agreement
3.2.2 CSP 2002-2006 & NIPs 2002-2004 and 2005-2006
3.2.3 CSP 2007-2013 and Multi-annual Indicative Programme 2007-2010
3.2.4 Multi-country aspects of the EC's co-operation with Lao PDR
3.3 IMPLEMENTATION AND RESOURCES
3.4 DONOR CO-ORDINATION IN LAO PDR
4 Findings
4.1 EQ1 - TO WHAT EXTENT HAVE EC INTERVENTIONS IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTED TO IMPROVEMENTS IN RURAL INCOME AND FOOD SECURITY?
4.2 EQ2 - TO WHAT EXTENT DID THE CHANGE IN THE EC’S STRATEGY OF SUPPORT FOR THE HEALTH SECTOR (FROM LARGE INTERVENTIONS TO NGO PROJECTS AND SUPPORT FOR THE GLOBAL FUND)CONTRIBUTE TO INCREASED AVAILABILITY OF AND ACCESS TO BASIC HEALTH SERVICES?
4.3 EQ3 - TO WHAT EXTENT HAS EC SUPPORT TO THE EDUCATION SECTOR RESULTED IN SUSTAINABLE INCREASE IN THE AVAILABILITY OF AND ACCESS TO PRIMARY EDUCATION?
4.4 EQ4 – TO WHAT EXTENT HAVE EC SUPPORTED ACTIONS ON TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND THROUGH ASEAN PROJECTS RESPONDED FLEXIBLY TO NEEDS AND INCREASED THE ABILITY OF THE LAO PDR TO BENEFIT FROM REGIONAL OR GLOBAL TRADE?
4.5 EQ5 - TO WHAT EXTENT HAS EC COOPERATION INCREASED AND IMPROVED LAO PDRPARTICIPATION IN ASEAN REGIONAL POLICY DIALOGUES?
| 4.6 EQ6 - TO WHAT EXTENT HAS EC INTEGRATION OF GENDER EQUALITY, GOOD GOVERNANCE, AND ENVIRONMENT INTO ITS INTERVENTIONS ACROSS THE BOARD, WORKING WITH BOTH CIVIL SOCIETY AND ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT, RESULTED IN IMPROVEMENTS?
4.7 EQ7 - TO WHAT EXTENT WAS THE EC MIX OF INSTRUMENTS (REGIONAL AND THEMATIC BUDGET LINES), APPROACHES (FIDUCIARY FUNDS, PROJECT APPROACH, MACRO-LEVEL PROGRAMMES, SWAP), AND FINANCING MODALITIES (SPECIFIC PROCEDURES, BUDGET SUPPORT, JOINT FUNDING) AND/OR CHANNELS OF DISBURSEMENT (GOVERNMENT, PRIVATE SECTOR NSAS, MULTILATERAL ORGANISATIONS) APPROPRIATE TO THE NATIONAL CONTEXT AND EU STRATEGIC POLICY AIMS?
4.8 EQ8 - TO WHAT EXTENT HAS THE EC COORDINATED AND COOPERATED WITH EU MEMBER STATES AND INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS INTENDING TO IMPROVE THE COMPLEMENTARITY OF THEIR INTERVENTIONS?
4.9 EQ9 – TO WHAT EXTENT HAS THE DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF EC INTERVENTIONS ADEQUATELY PRIVILEGED THE NEEDS OF THE MOST VULNERABLE GROUPS?
4.10EQ10 - TO WHAT EXTENT DID THE EC APPROACH RESULT IN ADOPTION OF EUROPEAN APPROACHES TOWARDS POVERTY REDUCTION THAT WOULD HAVE NOT BEEN ADOPTED ABSENT THE EC POLICY DIALOGUE AND COOPERATION PROGRAMMES?
5 Conclusions
5.1 GLOBAL
5.2 SPECIFIC
6 Recommendations
6.1 GLOBAL
6.2 SPECIFIC
7 An overall assessment
| VOLUME II: ANNEXES
Annex 1: Persons met
Annex 2: Documents Consulted
Annex 3: The legal basis for EC-Cooperation with Lao PDR: Bilateral and Regional Instruments
Annex 4: Information Matrix
Annex 5: Special Foci
Annex 6: Impact Diagram/Intervention Logic
Annex 7: Minutes of Dissemination Seminar
Annex 8: Methodological approach
Author (Corp. Body): PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt, Freiburg im Breisgau
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen | Development Researchers Net
Year: 2009
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Ref. Ares(2012)362416 | Ref. 1261
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: povertyevaluationdevelopment aideducationEUEuropean Commissionfinancial assistancehealth care delivery system
equality of treatmentcommercecooperationrural developmentLaosfoodprimary educationregional policytechnical assistanceenvironmental policy
administrationcivil society
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesLaos
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of EU Joint Programming Process of Development Cooperation (2011 - 2015 ) : Final Report ; Volume I – Main
Report
Title (other): Evaluation of EU Joint Programming Process of Development Cooperation (2011 - 2015 ) : Final Report ; Volume II –
Annexes | Fiche contradictoire : Evaluation of the EU Joint Programming Process of Development Cooperation (2011 - 2015)
| Evaluation of EU Joint Programming Process of Development Cooperation (2011 - 2015 ) : Executive Summary | Evaluation
du processus de programmation conjointe de la coopération au développement de l’UE (2011 - 2015) : Résumé
Abstract
This evaluation was commissioned by the Evaluation Unit of the European Commission’s Directorate-General for International Cooperation and Development. It evaluates the European Union’s (EU) Joint Programming process during the period 2011-2015. It covers all regions and countries of EU development cooperation. It aims at providing the EU and the wider public with an overall independent assessment of the Joint Programming process, and, on this basis, to provide recommendations to improve current and inform the future Joint Programming process.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
RÉSUMÉ
1. EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND CONTEXT
1.1 OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION
1.2 JOINT PROGRAMMING BACKGROUND AND PRINCIPLES
2. METHODOLOGY AND DATA SOURCES
2.1 OVERALL APPROACH AND PROCESS
2.2 INTERVENTION LOGIC
2.3 EVALUATION QUESTIONS
2.4 EVALUATION TOOLS
2.5 COUNTRY VISITS
2.6 CHALLENGES AND LIMITATIONS
3. RESPONSES TO THE EQS
3.1 EQ 1: GLOBAL AND COUNTRY-LEVEL CHALLENGES
3.2 EQ 2: JP AND AID FRAGMENTATION
3.3 EQ 3: JP AND AID TRANSPARENCY AND PREDICTABILITY
3.4 EQ 4: PARTNER COUNTRY OWNERSHIP AND LEADERSHIP
3.5 EQ 5: COHERENCE OF EU AND MS PROGRAMMING AND STRATEGIES
3.6 EQ 6: VISIBILITY OF EU DEVELOPMENT PARTNERS DUE TO JP
3.7 EQ 7: EU ORGANISATION TO ENSURE JP EFFICIENCY
3.8 EQ 8: JP AND TRANSACTION COSTS
4. CONCLUSIONS
4.1 OVERALL ASSESSMENT
4.2 CONCLUSIONS
4.3 ACHIEVEMENTS REFLECTED ON THE INTERVENTION LOGIC
5. RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 IMPROVE AND UPDATE THE INTERVENTION LOGIC
5.2 KEEP JP STRATEGIC, FLEXIBLE, AND PRAGMATIC
5.3 CLARIFY AND REINFORCE THE ROLE OF ALL STAKEHOLDERS
List of tables
List of figures
List of Annexes in Volume II
| Volume II
ANNEX A. TERMS OF REFERENCE
ANNEX B. METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH
ANNEX C. DOCUMENTS CONSULTED
ANNEX D. PERSONS INTERVIEWED
ANNEX E. EVALUATION DATA MATRIX
ANNEX F. SURVEY RESULTS
ANNEX G. COUNTRY NOTE BOLIVIA
ANNEX H. COUNTRY NOTE CAMBODIA
ANNEX I. COUNTRY NOTE ETHIOPIA
ANNEX J. COUNTRY NOTE KENYA
ANNEX K. COUNTRY NOTE LAOS
ANNEX L. COUNTRY NOTE MALI
ANNEX M. COUNTRY NOTE MOLDOVA
ANNEX N. COUNTRY NOTE MOROCCO
ANNEX O. COUNTRY NOTE MOZAMBIQUE
ANNEX P. COUNTRY NOTE MYANMAR
ANNEX Q. COUNTRY NOTE PALESTINE
ANNEX R. COUNTRY NOTE RWANDA
ANNEX S. COUNTRY NOTE SENEGAL (FR)
ANNEX T. COUNTRY NOTE ZAMBIA
Author (Corp. Body): Aide a? la De?cision Economique
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Internationale Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung | COWI Consulting Engineers and Planners AS
Year: 2017
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract No EVA 2011/Lot 1 | N° 2015/368247/2
Language: en | fr
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EthiopiaevaluationBoliviadevelopment aiddevelopment aid policyEUfinancial assistanceCambodia
KenyacooperationLaosMaliMoroccoMozambiqueMyanmarPalestinepartnershipRwanda
ZambiaSenegal
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesMoldovaBoliviaMoroccoEthiopia
KenyaMozambiqueRwandaZambiaMaliSenegalPalestinian TerritoryCambodiaLaosMyanmar
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Implementing EU food and nutrition security policy commitments : Third biennial report ; Report from the Commission to
the European Parliament and the Council
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Global and European policy developments
3. Reporting and progress
Disbursements
Progress towards policy priorities and performance criteria
Coordination, complementarity and coherence (3Cs)
4. Results reporting
5. Thematic focus
Climate-resilient approaches
Nutrition-sensitive agricultural practices
6. Overall findings and recommendations
ANNEXES
Acronyms
1. Additional figures and examples of intervention, by priority
1.1 An overview of food and nutrition security as part of EU official development assistance (ODA)
1.2 Progress against performance criteria
1.3 Examples of interventions per priority
1.4 Progress towards policy priorities and performance criteria
1.5 EU and MS support to partner countries
2. Case studies
2.1 EU Joint Programming in Senegal
2.2 EU Joint Programming in Laos
2.3 Nepal, Rural Village Water Resources Management Project
3. Further details on the thematic focus
3.1 Climate-resilient approaches
3.2 Nutrition-sensitive agricultural practices
4. Methodology for the national reports and programmes spreadsheet database
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Internationale Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung | Europäische Kommission / EuropeAid
Year: 2018
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978-92-79-96556-2 | MN-01-18-977-EN-N
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: development aidnutritionEUclimateagricultural developmentLaosgroceriesfood
NepalSenegal
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relationsAgricultural policy. Agricultural developmentFood and nutrition
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesSenegalNepalLaos
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
« Previous
Next »
Copyright (C) 2003-2019 European Documentation Centres / Update: 09.10.2019