Suche nach Schlagworten '00006168'
30 entries found on 2 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 20Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),
Title: Genetically modified organisms (GMOs): |
---|
Title (other): The significance of gene flow through pollen transfer ; a review and interpretation of published literature and recent/current research from the ESF ?Assessing the Impact of GM Plants? (AIGM) programme for the European Science Foundation and the European Environment Agency |
Abstract This report, written for the EEA by experts from the European Science Foundation, considers the significance of the transfer by pollen of genes from six major genetically modified (GM) crop types that are close to commercial release in the European Union. Oilseed rape, sugar beet, potatoes, maize, wheat and barley are reviewed in detail using recent and current research findings to assess their potential environmental and agronomic impacts. The report also includes a short review of the current status of GM fruit crops in Europe.[Author vide copyright] |
Series Title: Environmental issue report ; 28 |
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Umweltagentur | European Environment Agency |
Year: 2002 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 92-9167-411-7 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: EUgenetic engineeringfoodenvironmental researchenvironmental policy |
Subject: Heredity. Genetic engineeringFeeding. FoodPollution control. Environmental technology |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Umweltagentur (http://www.eea.eu.int/) |
Title: Die Erweiterung der Europäischen Union: ein geregelter Markt für den Verbraucher |
---|
Title (other): Enlarging the European Union: A well-regulated market place | L'élargissement de l'Union Européenne: un marché bien régulé |
Series Title: Das Europa von Morgen: Die Kernfragen | Tomorow's Europe: The Key Issues | L'Europe de demain: Les rèsponses a vos questions |
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung |
Year: 2003 |
Language: en | de | fr |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: EU expansionfoodconsumer protection |
Subject: European Community law in generalVarious food industriesFood and nutritionPollution control. Environmental technology |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu.int/) |
Title: Screening report Croatia : Chapter 12: Food safety, veterinary and phytosanitary policy |
---|
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung |
Year: 2007 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: EU expansionCroatiafoodplant preservationsecurityprotection of animals |
Subject: European Community external relations and associated countries |
Countries Scheme: Croatia |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Screening report Turkey : Chapter 12: Food safety, veterinary and phytosanitary policy |
---|
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung |
Year: 2007 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: EU expansionfoodplant preservationprotection of animalsTurkeyconsumer protection |
Subject: European Community external relations and associated countries |
Countries Scheme: Turkey |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: European Commission's support to the Republic of Moldova : country level evaluation ; Final synthesis report |
---|
Title (other): EVInfo; Observations ...; Fiche contradictoire | Evaluation of the European Commissions Support to the Republic of Moldova : Ref. 1094 , EVINFO | Fiche Contratictoire : Evaluation of the European Commission's support to the Republic of Moldova | Evaluation of the European Commission's support to the Republic of Moldova : Observations and Judgement on the final evaluation report | Fiche Contradictoire : Evaluation of the European Commission's support to the Republic of Moldova : Follow-up (one year later) |
Abstract The purpose of this evaluation is to provide policy-makers and managers of the Commissions relevant external co-operation Services as well as other relevant DGs (such as DG Trade and DG Environment), and the EC Delegations in Chisinau and Kiev, with an independent assessment of the EC programme of co-operation with Moldova. The quality of EC assistance is assessed on the basis of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Development Assistance Committee (DAC) criteria of relevance, effectiveness, impact, efficiency, and sustainability. The "3Cs" of coordination, complementarity, and coherence are also covered. The period covered by the evaluation is 2000-2006. However, as it is intended to be a forward-looking document, the team did not abruptly truncate the analysis at the end of 2006.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1. Purpose of the evaluation 1.2. Analysis and main findings 1.3. Overall Conclusions 1.4. Overall recommendations 2. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ANSWERS TO EVALUATION QUESTIONS 2.1. Overview of Evaluation Questions 2.2. EQ (J) Justice and Home Affairs 2.3. EQ (N) - NGOs and Civil Society 2.4. EQ (S) - SMEs and Rural Development 2.5. EQ (E) - Trade and Economy 2.6. EQ(F) FSP 2.7. EQ (H) - Health 2.8. EQ(X) Environment 2.9. EQ (T)-Transnistria 2.10. EQ (R) Relevance and Coherence 2.11. EQ(C) Coordination and Complementarity 3. SECTOR-SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS 3.1. EQ (J) - Justice and Home Affairs 3.2. EQ (N) NGOs and Civil Society 3.3. EQ(S) - SMEs and rural development 3.4. EQ (E) Trade and economic links 3.5. EQ (F) Food Security Programme (FSP) 3.6. EQ(H) Health 3.7. EQ(X) Environment 3.8. EQ (T) Transnistria 3.9. EQ (R) Relevance and Coherence 3.10. EQ (C) Coordination and Complementarity OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF THE EC CO-OPERATION STRATEGY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 3.11. Global Evaluation of the EC strategy 3.12. Conclusions 3.13. Overall Recommendations |
Author (Corp. Body): EGEval II EEIG |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen | PARTICIP GmbH |
Year: 2007 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Ref. 1094 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: EU countriesDevelopment AidHuman resourcesMoldovadevelopment aiddevelopment aid policyEUEuropean Commission health care delivery systemcommercejudiciarycooperationrural developmentsustainabilityfoodenvironmental policyeconomic cooperationcivil society |
Subject: Bilateral and multilateral aidEuropean Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesMoldova |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu./) |
Title: Evaluation of EC co-operation with the LAO PDR : Final Report ; Volume 1 |
---|
Title (other): Evaluation of EC co-operation with the LAO PDR : Final Report ; Volume 2 | Evaluation of European Commissions Cooperation with ASEAN : Country Level Evaluation ; Final Report | Fiche Contradictoire : Evaluation of the Commission's support to the LAO PDR | Quality Grid : Evaluation of the Commission's cooperation with Laos ; Country Level Evaluation | Evaluation of the Commissions support to the LAO PDR : Ref. 1261 ; EVINFO |
Abstract The overall purpose of this evaluation is to ensure accountability for the use of allocated resources as well as to promote a lesson-learning culture in EC development cooperation. The main specific objectives of the evaluation were: to provide the relevant external co-operation services of the EC and the wider public with an overall independent assessment of the Commissions past and current cooperation relations with the Lao PDR; to identify key lessons in order to improve the current and future strategies and programmes of the Commission.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents 1 Introduction 1.1 FRAMEWORK OF THE EVALUATION 1.2 METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH 2 Development Co-operation Context 2.1 OVERVIEW 2.2 CONTEXT AND NATIONAL PRIORITIES 2.4 INVESTMENT 2.5 POVERTY 2.6 THE SOCIAL SECTOR: HEALTH AND EDUCATION 2.7 ENVIRONMENT 2.8 GOVERNANCE 2.9 HUMAN RIGHTS 3 EC Support to LAO PDR 3.1 THE OVERALL CONTEXT 3.2 EC STRATEGIC OBJECTIVES AND PRIORITIES IN LAO PDR 3.2.1 EC-Lao PDR Cooperation Agreement 3.2.2 CSP 2002-2006 & NIPs 2002-2004 and 2005-2006 3.2.3 CSP 2007-2013 and Multi-annual Indicative Programme 2007-2010 3.2.4 Multi-country aspects of the EC's co-operation with Lao PDR 3.3 IMPLEMENTATION AND RESOURCES 3.4 DONOR CO-ORDINATION IN LAO PDR 4 Findings 4.1 EQ1 - TO WHAT EXTENT HAVE EC INTERVENTIONS IN RURAL DEVELOPMENT CONTRIBUTED TO IMPROVEMENTS IN RURAL INCOME AND FOOD SECURITY? 4.2 EQ2 - TO WHAT EXTENT DID THE CHANGE IN THE ECS STRATEGY OF SUPPORT FOR THE HEALTH SECTOR (FROM LARGE INTERVENTIONS TO NGO PROJECTS AND SUPPORT FOR THE GLOBAL FUND)CONTRIBUTE TO INCREASED AVAILABILITY OF AND ACCESS TO BASIC HEALTH SERVICES? 4.3 EQ3 - TO WHAT EXTENT HAS EC SUPPORT TO THE EDUCATION SECTOR RESULTED IN SUSTAINABLE INCREASE IN THE AVAILABILITY OF AND ACCESS TO PRIMARY EDUCATION? 4.4 EQ4 TO WHAT EXTENT HAVE EC SUPPORTED ACTIONS ON TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND THROUGH ASEAN PROJECTS RESPONDED FLEXIBLY TO NEEDS AND INCREASED THE ABILITY OF THE LAO PDR TO BENEFIT FROM REGIONAL OR GLOBAL TRADE? 4.5 EQ5 - TO WHAT EXTENT HAS EC COOPERATION INCREASED AND IMPROVED LAO PDRPARTICIPATION IN ASEAN REGIONAL POLICY DIALOGUES? | 4.6 EQ6 - TO WHAT EXTENT HAS EC INTEGRATION OF GENDER EQUALITY, GOOD GOVERNANCE, AND ENVIRONMENT INTO ITS INTERVENTIONS ACROSS THE BOARD, WORKING WITH BOTH CIVIL SOCIETY AND ALL LEVELS OF GOVERNMENT, RESULTED IN IMPROVEMENTS? 4.7 EQ7 - TO WHAT EXTENT WAS THE EC MIX OF INSTRUMENTS (REGIONAL AND THEMATIC BUDGET LINES), APPROACHES (FIDUCIARY FUNDS, PROJECT APPROACH, MACRO-LEVEL PROGRAMMES, SWAP), AND FINANCING MODALITIES (SPECIFIC PROCEDURES, BUDGET SUPPORT, JOINT FUNDING) AND/OR CHANNELS OF DISBURSEMENT (GOVERNMENT, PRIVATE SECTOR NSAS, MULTILATERAL ORGANISATIONS) APPROPRIATE TO THE NATIONAL CONTEXT AND EU STRATEGIC POLICY AIMS? 4.8 EQ8 - TO WHAT EXTENT HAS THE EC COORDINATED AND COOPERATED WITH EU MEMBER STATES AND INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS INTENDING TO IMPROVE THE COMPLEMENTARITY OF THEIR INTERVENTIONS? 4.9 EQ9 TO WHAT EXTENT HAS THE DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF EC INTERVENTIONS ADEQUATELY PRIVILEGED THE NEEDS OF THE MOST VULNERABLE GROUPS? 4.10EQ10 - TO WHAT EXTENT DID THE EC APPROACH RESULT IN ADOPTION OF EUROPEAN APPROACHES TOWARDS POVERTY REDUCTION THAT WOULD HAVE NOT BEEN ADOPTED ABSENT THE EC POLICY DIALOGUE AND COOPERATION PROGRAMMES? 5 Conclusions 5.1 GLOBAL 5.2 SPECIFIC 6 Recommendations 6.1 GLOBAL 6.2 SPECIFIC 7 An overall assessment | VOLUME II: ANNEXES Annex 1: Persons met Annex 2: Documents Consulted Annex 3: The legal basis for EC-Cooperation with Lao PDR: Bilateral and Regional Instruments Annex 4: Information Matrix Annex 5: Special Foci Annex 6: Impact Diagram/Intervention Logic Annex 7: Minutes of Dissemination Seminar Annex 8: Methodological approach |
Author (Corp. Body): PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt, Freiburg im Breisgau |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen | Development Researchers Net |
Year: 2009 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Ref. Ares(2012)362416 | Ref. 1261 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: povertyevaluationdevelopment aideducationEUEuropean Commissionfinancial assistancehealth care delivery system equality of treatmentcommercecooperationrural developmentLaosfoodprimary educationregional policytechnical assistanceenvironmental policy administrationcivil society |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesLaos |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Food security: understanding and meeting the challenge of poverty |
---|
Title (other): Sécurité alimentaire: comprendre et relever le défi de la pauvreté |
Table of Contents Foreword Introduction 1 The various aspects of food security What do we mean by food security? Food insecurity Understanding more clearly certain notions inherent to food security 2 Food security: European Commission policies and actions New challenges, new strategies A vast range of instruments Managing the transition between humanitarian action and development aid: LRRD 3 Tomorrows challenges: eradicating food insecurity and combating poverty A global approach to national development policies Reviving agriculture and rural development The role of social transfers Strengthening the fight against malnutrition Information for action 4 Examples from the field Central America: Meeting the challenge at regional level Myanmar: Food security among displaced populations Ethiopia: Safety net for thousands of rural families Burkina Faso: Ensuring self-sufficiency among small producers |
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung | Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid |
Year: 2009 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978-92-79-10854-9 | KQ-81-08-521-EN-C | 978-92-79-10856-3 | KQ-81-08-521-FR-C |
Language: en | fr |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: development aid policyEUfoodquality control |
Subject: Development aid. Aid programmes and aid organizationsFeeding. Food |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: EU-US Transatlantic Development Dialogue: |
---|
Title (other): Road Map for Cooperation in Food Security 2010-2011 |
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung |
Year: 2010 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: development aid policyfoodconsumer protection |
Subject: International cooperationFood processingConsumption. Consumer protection |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesUSA |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: EU-Beitrag zu den Millenium-Entwicklungszielen : Wesentliche Ergebnisse von Programmen der Europäischen Kommission ; 2010 |
---|
Title (other): EU CONTRIBUTION TO THE MILLENNIUM DEVELOPMENT GOALS. Some key results from European Commission programmes, 2010 | Contribution de lUE auxobjectifs du Millénaire pour le développement. Quelques résultats importants des programmes de la Commission européenne, 2010 |
Table of Contents Versprechen in die Tat umsetzen Wir haben bedeutende Fortschritte erzielt Armut und Hunger Primarschulbildung Gleichstellung der Geschlechter Kindersterblichkeit Gesundheitsversorgung der Mütter HIV/AIDS, Malaria und andere schwere Krankheiten Ökologische Nachhaltigkeit Globale Partnerschaft für Entwicklung Fakten und Zahlen der EU-Beihilfe Methodologischer Hinweis |
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid |
Year: 2010 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978-92-79-18809-1 | KQ-31-10-554-DE-C | 978-92-79-16345-6 | KQ-31-10-554-EN-C | 978-92-79-16350-0 | KQ-31-10-554-FR-C |
Language: en | de | fr |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: educationdevelopment aid policyhealthsustainabilityfood |
Subject: Development aid. Aid programmes and aid organizations |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Social transfers : an effective approach to fight food insecurity and extreme poverty ; Concept Note |
---|
Table of Contents INTRODUCTION SOCIAL PROTECTION SOCIAL TRANSFERS SOCIAL TRANSFERS JUSTIFICATION SOCIAL TRANSFERS IMPACTS SOCIAL TRANSFERS PRECONDITIONS SOCIAL TRANSFERS IMPLEMENTATION SOCIAL TRANSFERS OPPORTUNITIES FOR THE E.C. |
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid |
Year: 2010 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: development aid policyhealthgroceriesfood |
Subject: Development aid. Aid programmes and aid organizationsFood and nutrition |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Evaluation de la coopération de lUnion européenne avec le Burkina Faso : Evaluation de niveau national ; Rapport Final ; Volume 1 Rapport Principal |
---|
Title (other): Evaluation de la coopération de l'Union européenne avec le Burkina Faso : Evaluation de niveau national ; Rapport Final ; Volume 2 Annexes | Evaluation de la Coopération de l'UE avec le Burkina Faso : Fiche contradictoire | Evaluation de la stratégie de la CE au Burkina Faso : Grille de Qualité du Rapport Final | Evaluation de la Coopération de l 'UE avec le Burkina Faso de 1999 à 2008 : ref. 1275 : EVINFO |
Abstract This report presents the results of the evaluation of the European Unions cooperation strategy in Burkina Faso between 1999 and 2008. The main objectives of the evaluation are to provide the EU departments concerned and the general public with a global and independent appraisal of past and present EU cooperation with Burkina Faso. The evaluation identifies the main lessons learned from this cooperation with a view to improving the current and future strategies and programmes of the EU.The scope of the evaluation covers the programming and implementation of the 8th and 9th EDFs. Reference is made to the 10th EDF, in order to put the results of the evaluation into perspective in terms of conclusions and operational recommendations.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents RESUME Summary 1 Introduction 1.1 Cadre, objectif et champ de lévaluation 1.1.1 Cadre de lévaluation 1.1.2 Objectif de lévaluation 1.1.3 Champ de lévaluation 1.2 Structure du rapport 1.3 Méthodologie de lévaluation 1.3.1 Phases successives dévaluation 1.3.2 Schéma de la logique de lintervention de lUni on européenne 1.3.3 Questions dévaluation, critères de jugement et indicateurs 1.3.4 Processus de collecte et d'analyse des données et démarche de jugement appliquée 1.3.5 Limites du processus de collecte et analyse des données et des jugements 2 CONTEXTE GLOBAL DE LA COOPERATION CE-BURKINA FASO 2.1 Contexte politique, économique, social et culturel 2.2 Politique du Gouvernement 2.2.1 La Stratégie de développement du Burkina Faso 2.2.2 Rapport national sur les OMD 2.3 Aide au développement 1999-2008 et principaux bailleurs 2.4 Stratégie de coopération au développement de lUE au Burkina Faso 2.4.1 Documents de stratégie pays (DSP) et programme indicatif national (PIN) 2.4.2 Stratégie de Coopération Régionale 2.4.3 La logique générale dintervention de laide programmable des PIN 2.5 Moyens daide disponibles et employés pour la mise en uvre de la stratégie 2.6 Autres interventions communautaires et articulation à laide programmable de niveau national 3 REPONSES AUX QUESTIONS EVALUATIVES 3.1 Pertinence 3.1.1 Les interventions de laide européenne sont concordantes avec les priorités gouvernementales énoncées dans les documents de programmation (CJ 1.1) 3.1.2 Les bénéficiaires ont été impliqués dans la dé finition des objectifs sectoriels (CJ 1.2) 3.1.3 Réponse à la Question évaluative 3.2 Secteur transports 3.2.1 Les interventions de lUE (i) ont amélioré létat des routes du réseau prioritaire sur les axes internationaux et intérieurs, et de ce fait (ii) dimi nué les coûts de transports et les temps de parcours (CJ 2.1) | 3.2.2 Les interventions de lUnion améliorent la sécurité routière (CJ 2.2) 3.2.3 Les interventions de lUE ont participé à augmenter les échanges commerciaux nationaux et internationaux (CJ 2.3) 3.2.4 Le dispositif institutionnel promu par les interventions de lUE a augmenté durablement les capacités des acteurs de lentretien routier et les ressources financières qui lui sont dédiées (CJ 2.4) 3.2.5 Les interventions de lUE dans le secteur des transports ont amélioré la visibilité de lUE auprès des acteurs (CJ 2.5) 3.2.6 Les interventions de lUE dans le secteur des transports ont amélioré laccessibilité aux services sociaux (CJ 2.6) 3.2.7 Réponse à la Question évaluative 2 3.3 Appuis macroéconomiques 3.3.1 Laide budgétaire de lUE a amélioré la qualité et la quantité du financement extérieur du Burkina Faso (CJ 3.1) 3.3.2 Les interventions en matière dappui macroéconomique de lUE ont contribué à lamélioration de la gestion des finances publiques (CJ 3.2) 3.3.3 Lintervention de lUE a contribué à lamélioration des services sociaux de base (CJ 3.3) 3.3.4 Les interventions des partenaires en matière daide budgétaire, y compris celles de lUE, ont contribué à lamélioration de la stabilité macroéconomique et à la réduction de la pauvreté (CJ 3.4) 3.3.5 Réponse à la Question évaluative 3 3.4 Développement rural et de sécurité alimentaire 3.4.1 Développement rural (CJ 4.1) 3.4.2 La sécurité alimentaire (CJ 4.2) 3.4.3 Réponse à la Question évaluative 4 3.5 Eau et assainissement 3.5.1 Lintervention européenne a permis daméliorer lapprovisionnement en eau potable et laccès à lassainissement des populations défavorisées (CJ 5.1) 3.5.2 Lintervention européenne a permis daméliorer la situation sanitaire dans les zones dintervention (CJ 5.2) 3.5.3 Les installations financées sont toujours fonctionnelles (CJ 5.3) 3.5.4 Réponse à la Question évaluative 5 3.6 Culture | 3.10.2 Les interventions de lUE sont menées en coordination avec la politique nationale et les interventions des autres PTF (CJ10.2) 3.10.3 Réponse à la Question évaluative 10 3.11 Questions transversales 3.11.1 Les interventions de lUE ont intégré la dimension environnementale, genre, VIH/SIDA et droit de lhomme (CJ 11.1) 3.11.2 Les interventions de lUE ont contribué à améliorer le degré et les modalités de prise en compte de ces questions transversales par le gouvernement (CJ 11.2) 3.11.3 Réponse à la Question évaluative 11 4 CONCLUSIONS 4.1 Conclusions générales 4.1.1 La pertinence de lapproche stratégique et des interventions 4.1.2 Lefficacité de laide dans les différents secteurs intervention 4.1.3 Lefficience des interventions 4.1.4 Les effets (impacts) et la viabilité des interventions 4.2 Conclusions spécifiques (CS) à chaque question dévaluation 5 RECOMMANDATIONS 5.1 Recommandations de portée générale 5.2 Recommandations spécifiques concernant les interventions dans le secteur des transports et infrastructures routières 5.3 Recommandations spécifiques concernant lappui budgétaire 5.4 Recommandations spécifiques ayant trait aux interventions dans le secteur du développement rural et de la sécurité alimentaire 5.5 Recommandations spécifiques ayant trait aux interventions dans le secteur eau et assainissement 5.6 Recommandations spécifiques concernant les interventions dans le secteur « Culture » 5.7Recommandations spécifiques concernant les interventions dans le secteur privé | 3.6.1 Le nombre dacteurs non étatiques appuyé (nouveaux ou existants) est significatif (CJ 6.1) 3.6.2 Les acteurs non étatiques appuyés sont viables et peuvent exercer leur influence de manière durable + impact sur l'économie et l'emploi (CJ 6.2) 3.6.3 Réponse à la Question évaluative 6 3.7 Secteur privé et intégration régionale 3.7.1 Le secteur privé est renforcé et constitue un réel moteur du développement économique (CJ 7.1) 3.7.2 Améliorations constatées en matière législative (CJ 7.2) 3.7.3 Un secteur productif plus compétitif à linternational (CJ 7.3) 3.7.4 Réponse à la Question évaluative 7 3.8 Efficience 3.8.1 Pour les différents outils utilisés, les décisions prises , les moyens mis en place et les résultats obtenus sont effectifs dans des délais raisonnables et correspondant aux besoins des bénéficiaires (CJ 8.1) 3.8.2 Adéquation des ressources utilisées par rapport aux résultats obtenus, pour les différents instruments utilisés (analyse comparative des différents outils financiers) (CJ 8.2) 3.8.3 Réponse à la Question évaluative 8 3.9 Bonne gouvernance 3.9.1 La perception du pays est bonne (CJ 9.1) 3.9.2 LUnion européenne participe activement au renforcement des capacités nationales (CJ 9.2) 3.9.3 Les interventions de lUnion européenne en matière de renforcement des capacités sont efficaces et une amélioration est constatée dans les performances des organisations touchées (CJ 9.3) 3.9.4 Les interventions de lUnion européenne ont contribué à une meilleure gouvernance sectorielle (CJ 9.4) 3.9.5 Réponse à la Question évaluative 9 3.10 Cohérence, complémentarité et coordination (3C) 3.10.1 Les effets attendus des interventions de lUnion européenne sont complémentaires et additionnels aux effets des interventions des autres PTF dont les interventions des Etats membres. (CJ10.1) | Volume II ANNEXE 1 TERMES DE RÉFÉRENCES ANNEXE 2 LOGIQUE DINTERVENTION ET STRATÉGIE DE LA CE ET PRÉSENTATIONS SECTORIELLES ANNEXE 2.1 DOCUMENTS DE POLITIQUE EUROPEENNE POUR LA COOPERATION AU DEVELOPPEMENT ANNEXE 2.2 LOGIQUE DINTERVENTION DE LA CE AU BURKINA FASO ANNEXE 2.3 DONNEES QUANTITATIVES COMPLEMENTAIRES SUR LA COOPERATION CE BURKINA FASO ANNEXE 2.4 STRATEGIE MISE EN UVRE PAR MACRO-SECTEUR/THEME DU DSP 1. INFRASTRUCTURES ET TRANSPORTS 2. DEVELOPPEMENT RURAL ET SECURITE ALIMENTAIRE 3. EAU ET ASSAINISSEMENT ANNEXE 3 INVENTAIRE DES PROJETS ET PROGRAMMES AU BURKINA FASO 1. INVENTAIRE 7E FED(À PARTIR DE 1999) 2. INVENTAIRE 8E FED 3. INVENTAIRE 9E FED 4. INVENTAIRE 10E FED 5. LIGNES BUDGETAIRES ANNEXE 4 MÉTHODOLOGIE DE LÉVALUATION ANNEXE 4.1 PHASES SUCCESSIVES DEVALUATION ANNEXE 4.2 DU SCHEMA DE LA LOGIQUE DE LINTERVENTION DE LA CE AUX QUESTIONS DEVALUATION ET CRITERES DE JUGEMENT ANNEXE 4.3 PROCESSUS DE COLLECTE ET D'ANALYSE DES DONNEES ET DEMARCHE DE JUGEMENT APPLIQUE 1. METHODES DE COLLECTE DE DONNEES 2. METHODES DANALYSE DES DONNEES 3. DEMARCHE DE JUGEMENT 4. LIMITES DU PROCESSUS DE COLLECTE ET ANALYSE DES DONNEES ET DES JUGEMENTS ANNEXE 4.4 APERÇU GLOBAL DES QUESTIONS EVALUATIVES, CRITERES DE JUGEMENT ET INDICATEURS UTILISES ET DES METHODES EMPLOYEES 1. PERTINENCE 2. TRANSPORTS 3. APPUI MACROECONOMIQUE 4. DEVELOPPEMENT RURAL ET SECURITE ALIMENTAIRE 5. EAU ET ASSAINISSEMENT 6. CULTURE 7. SECTEUR PRIVE 8. EFFICIENCE 9. GOUVERNANCE 10. 3C 11. QUESTIONS TRANSVERSALES | ANNEXE 5 MATRICE DEVALUATION ANNEXE 5.1 PERTINENCE ANNEXE 5.2 SECTEUR TRANSPORTS ANNEXE 5.3 APPUIS MACROECONOMIQUES ANNEXE 5.4 DEVELOPPEMENT RURAL ET DE SECURITE ALIMENTAIRE ANNEXE 5.5 EAU ET ASSAINISSEMENT ANNEXE 5.6 CULTURE ANNEXE 5.7 SECTEUR PRIVE ET INTEGRATION REGIONALE ANNEXE 5.8 EFFICIENCE ANNEXE 5.9 BONNE GOUVERNANCE ANNEXE 5.10 COHERENCE, COMPLEMENTARITE ET COORDINATION (3C) ANNEXE 5.11 QUESTIONS TRANSVERSALES ANNEXE 6 FICHES DÉVALUATION DE PROGRAMMES/PROJETS ANNEXE 7 INDICATEURS DE SUIVI DE LAIDE BUDGÉTAIRE ANNEXE 8 DONNÉES ÉCONOMIQUES ET SOCIALES DU PAYS ANNEXE 8.1 SITUATION POLITIQUE, ECONOMIQUE ET SOCIALE DU PAYS ANNEXE 8.2 DONNEES STATISTIQUES DU PAYS ANNEXE 9 BAILLEURS ET APD AU BURKINA FASO ANNEXE 10 BIBLIOGRAPHIE ANNEXE 11 LISTE DES PERSONNES RENCONTRÉES ANNEXE 12 CALENDRIER DE LA MISSION DE TERRAIN ANNEXE 13 COMPTES RENDUS DES « FOCUS GROUPS » ANNEXE 13.1 FOCUS GROUP SUR LAIDE BUDGETAIRE DE LA CE ANNEXE 13.2 FOCUS GROUP DANS LE SECTEUR DE LA CULTURE ANNEXE 13.3 REUNION AVEC LES ACTEURS DU PRCE ANNEXE 13.4 REUNION AVEC LE COMITE DE COORDINATION DU PROGRAMME QUALITE |
Author: Adolehoume, Amakoe |
Contributer: ECO Consult |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Auswärtige Beziehungen | Arbeitsgemeinschaft Entwicklungspolitischer Gutachter | APRI | |
Year: 2010 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contrat n° EVA 2007/geo-acp | ref. 1275 |
Language: fr |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: evaluationBurkina Fasodevelopment aidEUcooperationculturerural developmentmacroeconomics foodprivate sectorregional integrationrelevancetrafficadministrationeconomics of water supply and distribution |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesBurkina Faso |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Food Facility Auction Floor |
---|
Title (other): Food security projects. A match for development |
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid |
Publisher: Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen |
Year: 2010 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978-92-79-15362-4 | KQ-30-10-322-EN-C |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: development aid policyhealthgroceriesfood |
Subject: Development aid. Aid programmes and aid organizationsFood and nutrition |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: The Food Facility |
---|
Title (other): A rapid response from the European Union |
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid |
Publisher: Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen |
Year: 2010 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978-92-79-15393-8 | KQ-31-10-366-EN-C |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: development aidEUfood |
Subject: Development projectsFood products. Food pricesFeeding. Food |
Countries Scheme: Global Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Country Level Evaluation Liberia : Final Report ; Volume 1: Main Report |
---|
Title (other): Country Level Evaluation Liberia : Final Report ; Volume 2: Annex | Fiche Contradictoire : Evaluation of the EC Cooperation with Liberia | Evaluation of the EU cooperation with Liberia : Final Report ; Observations and Judgement | Evaluation of the EC Cooperation with Liberia : ref. 1279 ; EVINFO |
Abstract This report presents the findings of the 2010 Country Level Evaluation of EC support to the Republic of Liberia. The evaluation was carried out to provide meaningful feedback to the European Commission and to the general public on the Commission's achievements in its cooperation with Liberia between 1999 and 2008. Lessons from this evaluation are meant to be used to inform the EC's current and future support to Liberia and other countries. The evaluation covered the EC's cooperation with Liberia during times of violent conflict in the county, i.e., from 2000 until 2003 but also the time after the signing of the Comprehensive Peace Agreement in 2003 in Accra and the first national elections after the war in 2005. The evaluators considered EC assistance during the periods of the EDF8 and 9 (from a variety of instruments), but also considered choices made by the EC to disburse aid under the EDF10. This report is covering the different sectors the EC supported in this period, including humanitarian aid and food security, support to disarm, demobilise, rehabilitate and reintegrate former fighters (DDRR), peace building, education and county development. Cutting across these sectors was the concern for gender and environmental issues.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents Volume 1 - Main report Executive Summary 1. Introduction 1.1. Purpose and Objectives of the Evaluation 1.2. Scope of the Evaluation 1.3. Objectives and Structure of the Final Report 2. Methodology of the Evaluation 2.1. Evaluation Questions, Judgment Criteria and Indicators 2.2. Data Collection Process 2.2.1. Data Collection during the Desk Phase 2.2.2. Data Collection during the Field Visit 2.2.3. Selection of Programmes included in Field Phase 2.3. Approach for Data Analysis and for Ensuring Data Reliability and Validity of Conclusions 2.4. Limitations 3. Strategic Context of EC cooperation 3.1. Political and Socio-economic Context 3.2. Evolution of the Economic Situation 3.3. Liberiaís Policy Framework 3.4. Development Assistance 4. EC Co-operation with Liberia 4.1. EC Assistance in Figures 4.2. Overall EC Intervention Logic 4.2.1. EC Intervention Logic in Liberia,1999 ñ 2005 (EDF8 and EDF9) 4.2.2. EC Intervention Logic in Liberia, 2006 ñ 2007 (EDF9, based on Country Strategy Paper) 4.2.3.EC Intervention Logic in Liberia, 2008 ñ 2013 (EDF10) 4.3. Evolution of the EC Intervention Logic 5. Answers to Evaluation Questions 5.1. Relevance of EC Cooperation Objectives 5.2. Disarmament, Demobilisation, Rehabilitation and Reintegration 5.3. Linking Relief, Rehabilitation and Development (LRRD) 5.4. Peace-building and Conflict Prevention 5.5. Food Security 5.6. Income Generation 5.7. Infrastructure 5.8. Capacity Building 5.9. Education 5.10. Adequacy of Cooperation Frameworks and Implementation Mechanisms 6. Conclusions 6.1. Principal Conclusions 6.2. Complementary Conclusions 6.2.1. Consequences of the Inadequate Operational Capacity at Delegation level (PC1) 6.2.2. Inadequacy of Design, Planning and Implementation Procedures and Mechanisms (PC3) 6.2.3. Impulses Emanating from EC Support to Liberia and Important Omissions (PC4) 7. Overall judgment of EC cooperation | 8. Recommedations Volume 2 Annex 1 Evaluation Matrices 1.1 Relevance of EC Cooperation 1.2 Disarmament, Demobilisation, Reintegration and Rehabilitation (DDRR) 1.3 Linking Relief, Rehabilitation and Development (LRRD) 1.4 Peace-building and Conflict Prevention 1.5 Food Security 1.6 Income Generation 1.7 Infrastructure 1.8 Capacity Building 1.9 Education 1.10 Adequacy of Cooperation Frameworks and Implementation Mechanisms 2 Bibliography 3 EC Portfolio per Evaluation Question 4 Effect diagrammes 5 Persons met 6 Inventory of EC projects/ programmes in the country 7 Supporting documentation to field methodology 7.1 Evaluation Process 7.2 Data Collection 7.3 Focus Group Reports 7.3.1 Focus Groups DDRR and Peace Building / Conflict Prevention 7.3.2 Focus Groups Food Security and Humanitarian Aid 7.3.3 Focus Groups Income Generation / Infrastructure 7.3.4 Focus Group Community Development / Education 7.4 Synthesis Phase 7.5 Overview about Evaluation Questions, Judgment Criteria and Indicators 8 ToR for the evaluation 9 PPT Slides for the seminar |
Author (Corp. Body): ECO Consult |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion |
Year: 2010 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract No EVA 2007/geo-acp | Ref. 1279 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: disarmamentevaluationeducationincomedevelopment aidEUEuropean Commissionguarantee of peace humanitarian aidconflict regulationcooperationgroceriesLiberiafood |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesLiberia |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Country Level Evaluation Republic of Malawi : Final Report ; Volume 1: Main Report |
---|
Title (other): Country Level Evaluation Republic of Malawi : Final Report ; Volume 2: Annexes | Fiche Contradictoire : Evaluation of the Commissions support to Malawi | Quality Grid : CLE Malawi ; Final Report, Oct 2011 | Evaluation of the European Commission's Co-operation with the Republic of Malawi : Country Level Evaluation ; EVINFO |
Abstract This evaluation of the European Commission?s (EC) co-operation with Malawi was carried out in 2010 and 2011. The main objectives of the evaluation were provision of an independent assessment to the Commission of the EU and to the wider public of the Commission`s past and current co-operation relations with Malawi and to identify key lessons in order to improve the current and future strategies and programmes of the Commission of the EU.The evaluation covers co-operation strategies and implementation including a mix of all activities and modalities during the period 2003-2010 (implementation of the European Development Fund (EDF8 & EDF9, and programming of EDF10). During this period the support of the Commission included focal sectors (regional development, agriculture and food security, regional inter-connection local and regional road transport), non-focal sectors (support to trade and investment, fight against HIV/AIDS and governance (civic education, justice and support to Non-State Actors) and cross-cutting issues (including environment, sustainability and gender issues).[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents 5.10 Choice of EC aid modalities contributing to the efficiency of EC support 6. Conclusions 6.1 Primary conclusions 6.2 Complementary (supporting) conclusions 6.2.1 Issues arising from and impacting on preparation and implementation of SWAps and budget support (PC1) 6.2.2 Management of modalities (PC2) 6.2.3 Aspects of governance (PC3) 6.2.4 Complementarity and coordination 6.2.5 Regional integration (PC5) 6.2.6 Cross-cutting issues 6.2.7 Agriculture and food security 7. Recommendations 7.1 Improving implementation effectiveness and sustainability 7.2 Maximising the impacts of SWAps and budget support 7.3 Management of modalities 7.4 Aspects of governance 7.5 Regional integration 7.6 Cross-cutting issues 7.7 Agriculture and food security | Volume I- Main Report 1. Introduction 1.1 Origin and Objectives of the Evaluation 1.2 Scope of the Evaluation 1.3 Purpose and Structure of the Draft Final Report 2. Methodology of the Evaluation 2.1 Evaluation Questions, Judgement Criteria and Indicators 2.2 Data Collection 2.3 Data Reliability and Analysis 2.4 Difficulties, Limitations (and Mitigation Measures) 3. EC- Malawi Co-operation Context 3.1 Broad Characteristics of Malawi 3.2 Political and Institutional Situation 3.3 Economy, Commerce and Private Sector 3.4 Governance 3.5 Malawi?s Development Strategies 3.6 Development Assistance 4. EC Strategy and Intervention Logic 4.1 General Framework and Principles of the EC co-operation 4.2 EC Intervention Logic 4.2.1 Evolution of EC Strategy and Support 4.2.2 EDF9 4.2.3 EDF10 4.3 Implementation 4.3.1 Budget Support 4.3.2 Focal Areas 4.3.3 Non-Focal Areas 4.3.4 Cross-Cutting Issues 5. Answers to Evaluation Questions 5.1 Response to the changing needs of the Malawian population and those expressed by GoM 5.2 EC contribution to agriculture-led economic growth 5.3 EC contribution to food security 5.4 Contribution of EC support to sector management of a road network that provides appropriate service levels 5.5 Contribution of EC support to the road sector for improved regional connectivity 5.6 Contribution of EC support to capacity building in trade negotiations and related reforms to regional integration 5.7 EC budget support and associated policy dialogue?s contribution to stabilising the external and fiscal balances 5.8 EC budget support contribution to improving PFM and to orienting budgetary priorities and actual expenditures towards poverty reduction 5.9 Contribution of EC support to Rule of Law (civic education and justice) and NSAs to increased participation and oversight of civic society in governmental and parliamentary decision-making processes | Volume 2 Annexes 1. EVALUATION MATRICES 2. INTERVENTION LOGICS 3. ACTIVITIES OF THE FIELD PHASE 4. SYNTHESIS PHASE 5. PROJECT INVENTORY 6. LIST OF PERSONS INTERVIEWED 7. FOCUS GROUP FICHES 8. ACTIVITY SCHEDULE OF FIELD PHASE 9. WORK PLAN 10. COUNTRY INFORMATION 11. EC STRATEGY AND INTERVENTION LOGIC 12. MALAWIS PROGRESS TOWARDS ACHIEVING THE MDGS 13. BIBLIOGRAPHY 14. PROJECT FICHES 15. DISSEMINATION SEMINAR SEPTEMBER 29TH, 2011 MINUTES 16. DISSEMINATION SEMINAR PRESENTATION 17. TOR |
Author (Corp. Body): ECO Consult |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Arbeitsgemeinschaft Entwicklungspolitischer Gutachter | APRI | Euronet | Institut de Recherches dApplications des Me?thodes de De?veloppement, |
Year: 2011 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract No EVA 2007/geo-acp |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: AIDSevaluationdevelopment aidEUEuropean Commissiongender mainstreaminggovernancecommerce investmentcooperationagricultureMalawisustainable developmentfoodregional developmentroad trafficenvironment |
Subject: Development aid. Aid programmes and aid organizationsEuropean Community external relations |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesMalawi |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Analysis and development of inclusive value chains to support small-scale producers to access agricultural markets : Information note ; Rural development, food security and nutrition |
---|
Abstract The value chain (VC) analysis and development can improve the living conditions of the rural population and contribute to food security. The key elements are: the knowledge of a sub-sector which will gradually be building up among the stakeholders, the confidence created among them and the resulting dynamics. The two main challenges consist in involving the stakeholder so that they appropriate the analysis tool and then in finding the right entry point for the analysis. This is the condition for this kind of exercise to be directed towards its goal first and foremost the eradication of poverty, in accordance with the principal objective of our cooperation whilst remaining rigorous in processing the information.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents 0. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY STRENGTHS AND PROSPECTS OF VC ANALYSIS DIFFICULTIES AND RISKS ENTAILED IN VC ANALYSISAND DEVELOPMENT 1. INTRODUCTION AN IMPORTED CONCEPT A FEW PRELIMINARY NOTIONS 2. CONTEXT AND APPROACH TO VC ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT A TOOL TO FIGHT POVERTY AND FOOD INSECURITY FROM MARKETS TO PRODUCTION THE FOCUS ON INCLUSIVE VC 3. CONCEPTUAL ASPECTS OF VC ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT DEFINITIONS CONCEPTS VC ANALYSIS COMPONENTS 4. STANDARD PROCEDURE FOR VC ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT 5. USES OF VC ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT SECTORAL POLICY IN AGRICULTURE LOCAL PLANNING LOCAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INTEGRATION OF PRODUCER ORGANISATIONS RESEARCH DONOR SUPPORT FOR VC DEVELOPMENT 6. OBSERVATIONS CONCERNING VC ANALYSIS AND DEVELOPMENT RECENT TRENDS IN VCs VC AND OTHER RELATED APPROACHES VC AND PRODUCER ORGANISATIONS (POS) VC AND DONORS VC AND GENDER VC AND ENVIRONMENT 7. BIBLIOGRAPHY REFERENCES |
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / EuropeAid |
Year: 2011 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Arbeitspapiere, Preprints |
Keyword: analysismeeting of requirementsdevelopment aidEUsmall-scale businessrural populationagricultureagricultural development living conditionsfood |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relationsAgricultural production |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Screening report Iceland : Chapter 12 Food safety, veterinary and phytosanitary policy |
---|
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission |
Year: 2011 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: EUjoining of the European UnionIcelandgroceriesfoodplant preservationanimalprotection of animals consumer protection |
Subject: European Community external relationsAgricultural productionVarious food industriesFood and nutrition |
Countries Scheme: Iceland |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Evaluation of the Commission of the European Union's co-operation with Ethiopia : Country Level Evaluation ; Final Report ; Volume 1 |
---|
Title (other): Evaluation of the Commission of the European Union's co-operation with Ethiopia : Country Level Evaluation ; Final Report ; Volume 2 - Annex | "Fiche Contradictoire" : Evaluation of the Commissions support to Ethiopia (2004 - 2008) | Evaluation of the European Commission cooperation with Ethiopia 2004-2008 : Quality Grid on Final Report | Evaluation of the Commission of the EU's co-operation with Ethiopia : ref. 1301 ; Abstract ; EVINFO |
Abstract The main objective of this evaluation was to draw out lessons for future EU cooperation.This report presents the findings of the 2010 Country Level Evaluation of the European Unions support to Ethiopia. The evaluation was carried out to provide meaningful feedback to the European Commission, the Member States and the general public on the achievements of the EU cooperation programme with Ethiopia between 2004 and 2008, an earlier period of cooperation having been covered by the 2003 Country-Level Evaluation. The lessons from this evaluation are intended to be used to inform the current and future EU support to Ethiopia. Lessons learned from the results of the EU's support to Ethiopia may also be fruitful for other ACP countries facing similar high economic growth prospects and governance issues.The evaluation covered the EU cooperation programme with Ethiopia during the period of economic recovery which followed the war with Eritrea and it also included the 2005 post-election violence and the subsequent cooling of Ethiopia-donor relations. The evaluators focused not only on the EUs assistance during implementation of the CSP and 9th EDF NIP (2002-2007) (including a variety of instruments), but also on the choices it made for planning aid disbursements under the 10th EDF (2008-2013).[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents Executive summary 1 Introduction 2 Methodology of the evaluation 2.1 Evaluation Questions, Judgment Criteria and Indicators 2.2 Data collection process 2.3 Limitations 3 The Cooperation context 3.1 Trends in Economic development 3.2 Private sector development 3.3 MDG achievements and poverty 3.4 Governance and civil society development 3.5 Ethiopias policy framework 3.5.1 Transport sector 3.5.2 Food security 3.5.3 Education 3.5.4 Health 3.6 External aid 4 EU cooperation with Ethiopia 4.1 9th EDF Intervention Logic 4.2 10th EDF Intervention Logic 4.3 Overall strategic response 5 Findings 5.1 Ability of PBS to achieve objectives initially assigned to GBS 5.2 PBS effects on public expenditures 5.3 Effects on the road network management and road operations regulation 5.4 Effect of EU funded road rehabilitation projects on accessibility 5.5 Effects on food insecurity 5.6 Effects on agricultural assets 5.7 Effects on administrative decentralisation 5.8 Civil society empowerment 5.9 Effects on stability and conflict prevention 5.10 EU aid modalities mix 5.11 Findings on the previous Country level Evaluation 6 Conclusions Global assessement 6.1 Metaconclusions 6.2 Specific conclusions 6.2.1 GBS and PBS Supporting Primary Education and Health (EQ 1 and 2) 6.2.2 Road SBS (EQ 2 and 3) 6.2.3 Food Security (EQ 5 and 6) 6.2.4 Decentralisation (EQ 7) 6.2.5 Civil Society (EQ 8) 6.2.6 Conflict Prevention (EQ 9) 6.2.7 Aid efficiency (from EQ 10) 7 Recommendations List of Tables List of figures | Volume 2 Annex 1. Information matrix 2. Country profile, maps, key data 3. Evaluation design and methodology used 4. List of interviewees 5. Regional strategic objectives and priorities 6. Results and recommendations of the previous Country Level Evaluation 7. Diagrams of intended effects 8. List of projects (CRIS database) 9. List of documentation per sector 10. Minutes of the Dissemination Seminar October 6th, 2011 11. Presentation of the Dissemination Seminar 12. Terms of Reference List of tables List of figures List of acronyms |
Author (Corp. Body): ECO Consult |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Arbeitsgemeinschaft Entwicklungspolitischer Gutachter | African Peace Research Institute, Lagos | Euronet Consulting | Institut de R |
Year: 2012 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract No EVA 2007/geo-acp | Ref. 1301 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: Ethiopiapovertyevaluationeducationdevelopment aidEUhealthcooperation agricultural developmentfoodprivate sectorstabilitytransportation policyadministrationeconomic development (on national level)civil society |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesEthiopia |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Evaluation of Visibility of EU external action : Final Report ; Volume 1 |
---|
Title (other): Evaluation of Visibility of EU external action : Final Report ; Volume 2 Annexes Part 1 | Evaluation of Visibility of EU external action : Final Report ; Volume 3 Annexes Part 2 | Evaluation of Visibility of EU external action : Final Report ; Volume 4 Thematic Report on Crisis and Fragile States | Evaluation of Visibility of EU external action : Final Report ; Volume 5 Thematic Report on Financial and Economic Crisis | Evaluation of Visibility of EU external action : Final Report ; Volume 6 Thematic Report on Food Crisis | Evaluation of Visibility of EU external action : Final Report ; Volume 7 Thematic Report on Migration Part 1 - Mali | Evaluation of Visibility of EU external action : Final Report ; Volume 8 Thematic Report on Climate Change and Energy | Evaluation of Visibility of EU external action : Final Report ; Volume 9 Thematic Report on Environment, Biodiversity and Deforestation | Fiche Contradictoire : Evaluation of the Visibility of EU external action 2005-2010 | Quality Grid : Visibility of EU External Action ; Final Report, June 2012 | Thematic Evaluation of the Visibility of EU external action : 2005-2010 |
Abstract The mandate for this study was to undertake an evaluation of EU external action as managed by three DGs: DG RELEX, DG DEV and DG AIDCO. The Terms of Reference identified two main objectives (ToR, Feb 2010, Section 1 reproduced in Annex 1):· To provide an overall independent assessment of the visibility of the Commissions external action· To identify key lessons to improve current and future Commission strategies on visibility.The ToR also set out the temporal scope, 2005 to 2010, and a geographical scope that is essentially global with the exception of the EU enlargement countries. Stakeholders from both inside and outside the EU, in both partner countries and global organisations, were to be covered. The main element to limit the focus of the study was the designation of six themes which were to be the object of thematic studies involving six field visits to different countries (listed below section 1.3).Finally the ToR also asked for the evaluation to be forward looking, providing lessons and recommendations concerning visibility and also on coordination within the EU and on coherence within the EU and internationally.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1.1 Purpose of the Evaluation 1.2 Background of the Evaluation 1.3 Methodology 1.4 Analysis of the main findings for each Evaluation Question 1.5 Main Conclusions and Recommendations 2. INTRODUCTION 2.1 Synthesis of the Commissions Strategy and Programmes 2.2 Context 2.3 Purpose of this Evaluation 3. METHODOLOGY 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Judgement Criteria & Indicators 3.3 Data & Information Collection 3.3.1 Thematic Studies 3.3.2 Media Coverage Analysis 3.3.3 E-Survey 3.3.4 Interviews with Brussels-based actors 3.3.5 Eurobarometer reports analysis 3.3.6 Case studies of specific events and partnerships 3.4 Methods of Analysis 3.5 Methods of Judgement 4. MAIN FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS 4.1 Findings from the Thematic Studies and the other Data Sources 4.1.1 Findings from the Thematic Studies 4.1.2 Case studies of specific events and partnerships 4.1.3 Findings from other sources 4.2 Answers to each Evaluation Question 4.2.1 EQ1: The image of EU external action 4.2.2 EQ2: Do the Visibility communication priorities achieve their objectives? 4.2.3 EQ3: A single, clearly defined Visibility strategy for EU external action? 4.2.4 EQ4: Perceptions of the benefits of EU external action 4.2.5 EQ5: Coordination between the EU institutions and with the EU Member States? 4.2.6 EQ 6: Coherence of message across external and internal policies? 4.2.7 EQ 7: Value added of the EU as a global actor in major international fora? 4.2.8 EQ8: Adequacy of EC resources to carry out the visibility strategy 4.2.9 EQ9: Stakeholder perceptions of results relative to the costs 4.2.10 EQ10: Translating visibility strategies into action plans | 5. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 5.1 Conclusions 5.1.1 The image of EU external action is generally in line with pre-Lisbon officialpriorities 5.1.2 Communication work on EU external action lacks overall direction and leadership 5.1.3 Working in partnership with others is essential but there is a trade-off in lower EUvisibility 5.1.4 The image of EU external action varies geographically as well as by constituency 5.1.5 The nature of the EU imposes constraints that impact on its visibility 5.1.6 The resources for promoting the visibility of EU external action have been adequate 5.2 Recommendations 5.2.1 Reaffirm, renew and strengthen the established image of EU external action 5.2.2 Provide stronger central direction and leadership for communication work on EUexternal action 5.2.3 Agree that working in partnership is an intrinsic part of the image of EU externalaction and a core message for communication 5.2.4 Manage sensitively geographic and constituency variations in the visibility of EUexternal action 5.2.5 Pay special attention to the impact on visibility of the EUs specific nature 5.2.6 Review the distribution of resources for promoting the visibility of EU externalaction particularly at the level of EU Delegations 5.2.7 Other specific recommendations for each theme 5.3 Summary of key conclusions and recommendations LIST OF BOXES, FIGURES AND TABLES VOLUME 2 ANNEXES PART 1 ANNEX 1: TERMS OF REFERENCE ANNEX 2: THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK ANNEX 3: THE EU LEGAL FRAMEWORK: THE EXTERNAL ACTION OF THE EU ANNEX 4: INTERVENTION LOGIC ANNEX 5: STANDARD FORMAT FOR COLLECTING EVIDENCE IN RELATION TO THE EQS ANNEX 6: THE ORGANIZATION OF COMMUNICATION ACTIVITIES WITHIN THE COMMISSION ANNEX 7: COUNTRY SELECTION ANNEX 8: GUIDELINES FOR THE THEMATIC WORK ANNEX 9: EVIDENCE FROM INTERVIEWS WITH EU OFFICIALS IN RELATION TO THE EQS ANNEX 10: REPORT FROM INTERVIEWS WITH CIVIL SOCIETY ANNEX 11: LIST OF PEOPLE INTERVIEWED | VOLUME 3 ANNEXES PART 2 ANNEX 12: MEDIA COVERAGE ANALYSIS ANNEX 13: E-SURVEY SYNTHESIS REPORT ANNEX 14: THE PARTNERSHIP WITH THE UNITED NATIONS ANNEX 15: EUROBAROMETER SURVEY ANNEX 16: CASE STUDY: TUNISIA ANNEX 17: BIBLIOGRAPHY VOLUMES 4-9: THEMATIC REPORTS ON THE SIX THEMES VOLUME 4: THEMATIC REPORT ON CRISIS AND FRAGILE STATES VOLUME 5: THEMATIC REPORT ON FINANCIAL & ECONOMIC CRISIS VOLUME 6: THEMATIC REPORT ON FOOD CRISIS VOLUME 7: THEMATIC REPORT ON MIGRATION - PART 1: MALI & PART 2: LAMPEDUSA VOLUME 8: THEMATIC REPORT ON CLIMATE CHANGE AND ENERGY VOLUME 9: THEMATIC REPORT ON ENVIRONMENT, BIODIVERSITY AND DEFORESTATION |
Author (Corp. Body): PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt, Freiburg im Breisgau |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Aide a? la De?cision Economique, Ottignies Louvain la Neuve | Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, Berlin | DRN | European |
Year: 2012 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: EuropeAid/122888/C/SER/Multi | EVA 2007 Lot 5 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: foreign policyevaluationbiodiversityenergy policydevelopment aid policyEUfinancial crisisglobalization climate changecooperationcrisis interventionMalimigrationfoodTunisiaenvironmental policyperceptioneconomic crisis |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations |
Countries Scheme: Global ResourcesEurope. General Resources |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Country Level Evaluation Zambia : Final Report ; Main Volume |
---|
Title (other): Country Level Evaluation Zambia : Final Report ; Volume 2: Annexes I - X | Country Level Evaluation Zambia : Final Report ; Volume 3: Annexes XI | Fiche Contradictoire : Evaluation of the European Unions cooperation with Zambia (Country level evaluation) ; Ref. Ares(2014)1805519 | Quality grid : Evaluation of the European Commission's Cooperation with Zambia ; Final Report (September 2012) | Summary of the Evaluation of the EU Co-operation with Zambia : Ref. 1316 ; EVINFO |
Abstract This report accordingly presents the findings of the 2010 Country Level Evaluation of the European Unions support for Zambia. The purpose of the evaluation is to provide meaningful feedback to the Commission, the Member States and the public on the achievements of EU cooperation with Zambia between 2001 and 2010. The lessons from the evaluation are intended to inform the current and future EU support for Zambia.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents Executive summary 1 Introduction 1.1 Framework of the evaluation 1.2 Overview of the evaluation process 1.3 Methodological approach 2 The Co-operation Context 3 EU Co-operation Strategy and Intervention Logic 4 Findings 4.1 Relevance and coherence 4.2 Direct and induced outputs of budget support 4.3 Shift towards private sector led development 4.4 Transport system public management institutional reform 4.5 Improved accessibility and mobility 4.6 Population health status 4.7 Democratic governance and Civil society 4.8 Food security and agriculture 4.9 Aid modalities and Aid efficiency 5 Conclusions 5.1 Global conclusions 5.2 Specific conclusions 5.2.1 Relevance and coherence (EQ 9) 5.2.2 Aid modalities and Aid efficiency (EQ 8) 5.2.3 GBS, SBS and MDG contract (EQ 1) 5.2.4 Private sector development (EQ 2) 5.2.5 Transport (EQ 3 and 4) 5.2.6 Health (EQ 5) 5.2.7 Democratic governance (EQ 6) 5.2.8 Agriculture and food security (EQ 7) 6 Recommendations Table of Figures List of Annexes List of Acronyms | Volume 2 Annex I : Terms of Reference Annex II: Evaluation design and methodology 1) The design of the Evaluation i) Inception Phase ii) Desk Phase iii) Field Phase iv) Synthesis Phase 2) Tools used at the different stages on the evaluation i) Team meetings and analysis of collected data ii) Strategy for data collection during the field phase iii) Interviews iv) Focus Group Discussions 3) Field mission information collection plan i) Sources and respondents ii) Methodological tools iii) Team organisation Annex III: Cooperation Context (Country Profile, Key Data) i) Social Environment - MDG Achievements ii) Governance and Civil Society iii) Zambias Policy Framework iv) External Aid v) EU Allocation and Disbursement Annex IV: Regional Strategic Objectives and Priorities Annex V: Main Results of the 2006 Country Strategy Evaluation Annex VI: Division of Responsibilities between Headquarters and Delegations Annex VII: Project Inventory (CRIS database) and Analysis i) List of bilateral EDF funding under EDF8, EDF9 and EDF10 (period 2001 -2010) ii) List of bilateral Budget Line funding during 2001 - 2010 iii) List of EIB loans for Zambia, 2001 2010 Annex VIII: List of Documents Consulted Annex IX: List of Persons Met Annex X: Logics of Intervention for EDF9 and EDF10 List of figures List of tables List of acronyms Volume 3 Annex XI: Information Matrix |
Author (Corp. Body): ECO Consult |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Arbeitsgemeinschaft Entwicklungspolitischer Gutachter | African Peace Research Institute, Lagos | Institut de Recherches dApplicatio |
Year: 2012 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract No EVA 2007/geo-acp |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: evaluationdemocracydevelopment aidEUfinancial assistancehealth statuscooperationagriculture foodprivate sectorZambiatransport systemadministrationcivil society |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesZambia |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |