Suche nach Schlagworten '00006308'
3 entries found on 1 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 3Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),
« Previous
Next »
Title: Thematic global evaluation of European Commission support to the education sector in partner countries (including basic and secondary education) : Final Report ; Volume I |
---|
Title (other): Thematic global evaluation of European Commission support to the education sector in partner countries (including basic and secondary education) : Final Report ; Volume IIa | Thematic global evaluation of European Commission support to the education sector in partner countries (including basic and secondary education) : Final Report ; Volume II b | Thematic global evaluation of European Commission support to the education sector in partner countries (including basic and secondary education) : Final Report ; Volume II c | Thematic global evaluation of European EC support to the education sector in partner countries (including basic and secondary education) : Final Report ; Volume II d | Fiche Contradictoire : Evaluation of the European Commissions support to the education sector in partner countries (including basic and secondary education) | Evaluation of the EC support to the education sector in partner countries (including basic and secondary education) 2000-2007 : Quality Grid on Final Report | Evaluation of the European Commissions support to Education sector in partner countries (including basic and secondary education) : ref. 1282 ; EVINFO |
Abstract This evaluation aims to assess the extent to which the European Commissions (EC) assistance has been relevant, efficient, effective and sustainable in producing the expected impacts in the education sector. Moreover, the evaluation also assesses co-ordination and complementarity with other donors and actors, coherence with the relevant EC policies and partner Governments priorities and activities, and with international legal commitments in education. The evaluation covers basic and secondary education, including the relevant sub-sectors, all regions where EC co-operation is implemented, and aid implementation over the period 2000-2007.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents Executive Summary Purpose and scope of the evaluation Background to the evaluation Methodology Analysis and main findings for each Evaluation Question Main conclusions Main recommendations 1 Introduction 1.1 Synthesis of the European Commissions strategy and programmes 1.1.1 ... 1.2 Intervention logic 1.3 Context of EC support to education : International policy framework for basic and secondary education and how the EC supports it 1.3.1 ... 1.4 The Evaluation Questions (EQs) 2 Methodology 2.1 Key steps of the evaluation process 2.2 Describing the object of the evaluation (structuring phase ? inventory) 2.3 Developing the methodological framework (structuring phase) 2.4 Collecting data (Desk Study and Field Phase): Overview of process and tools 2.4.1... 2.5 Collecting data: Details 2.6 Analysing and judging: Synthesis Phase 2.7 Dissemination 2.8 Challenges and limits of the evaluation 2.8.1... 3 Inventory: Overview on EC resources to support basic and secondary education 3.1 EC funding towards the education sector 3.1.1... 3.2 EC response to basic and secondary education needs 3.2.1... 3.3 Global financing gaps in basic education 4 Answers to the Evaluation Questions | 4.1 EQ1-relevance: To what extent is EC support aligned to education development objectives in national development plans, such as PRSPs, and ensures coherence between EC development co-operation policies on education and other EC policies affecting education? 4.1.1... 4.2 EQ2-access: To what extent has EC support to education contributed to improving access to basic education? 4.2.1... 4.3 EQ3-secondary: To what extent has EC support to education contributed to improving transition to secondary level (both lower and upper)? 4.3.1... 4.4 EQ4-quality: To what extent has EC support to education contributed toimproving the quality of education? 4.4.1... 4.5 EQ5-skills: To what extent has EC support to education contributed to enhancing basic education skills, especially literacy and numeracy? 4.5.1... 4.6 EQ6-delivery: To what extent has EC support to education helped in improving education system service delivery and resourcing? 4.6.1... 4.7 EQ7?transparency: To what extent has EC support to education helped in strengthening transparency and accountability of the management of education service delivery? 4.7.1... 4.8 EQ8-co-ordination & complementarity: To what extent, and how, has the EC contributed to improving co-ordination, complementarity and synergies with Member States and other donors to the education sector, in line with the Paris Declaration? 4.8.1... 4.9 EQ9-modalities: To what extent have the various aid modalities and funding channels and their combinations, in particular GBS/SBS/SSP/projects, been appropriate and contributed to improving access, equity and policy-based resource allocation in education? 4.9.1... 4.10Overall assessment of the EC Strategy 5Conclusions and recommendations 5.1 Conclusions 5.1.1 Cluster 1: ... 5.2 Recommendations 5.2.1 Cluster 1:... | Annex 26: Analysis of EC Country Strategy Papers (CSPs) Annex 27: List of people interviewed/met Annex 28: Documents consulted | VOLUME II: ANNEXES VOLUME IIa: DETAILED ANSWERS TO THE EVALUATION QUESTIONS Annex 1: Detailed answers to the Evaluation Questions VOLUME IIb: MAIN INDVIDUAL ANALYSES Annex 2: Inventory and typology of EC support to basic and secondary education Annex 3: EC Support to the education sector in partner countries: Results of the survey to EUDs Annex 4: Analysis of the European Court of Auditors (ECA) reports on education and GBS in Africa (Niger, Liberia, Namibia, Tanzania, Uganda and Burkina Faso) Annex 5: Focus Group Analysis (Results of video-conferences with a sample of EU Delegations) VOLUME IIc: COUNTRY NOTES Annex 6: Bangladesh Annex 7: Pakistan Annex 8: Dominican Republic Annex 9: Niger Annex 10: South Africa Annex 11: Tunisia VOLUME IId: ToR,SOME DEFINITIONS, FURTHERINDIVIDUAL ANALYSES, REFERENCES Annex 12: Terms of Reference Annex 13: Evaluation methodology Annex 14: Subsector definitions for the education sector Annex 15: Definitions of major education-related indicators Annex 16: Final set of evaluation questions, judgment criteria and indicators Annex 17: Test of EC Guidance for evaluations related to education Annex 18: International policy framework for basic and secondary education and how the EC sup-ports it Annex 19: EC policy related to support to education Annex 20: EC intervention logic related to basic and secondary education and the process of selecting Evaluation Questions Annex 21: Support to basic and secondary education: Global financing needs versus relative importance in EC support and humanresources allocated Annex 22: Note on international education indicators: Overview of EFA goals and indicators, MDGs, MDG targets and indicators, and FTI indicators Annex 23: Detailed statistical tables related to the desk study countries Annex 24: Details about compulsory education in the desk study countries Annex 25: Overview of international and regional surveys related to learning achievements |
Author (Corp. Body): PARTICIP GmbH, Wehingen |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen | EgeVal II | Aide a? la De?cision Economique, Ottignies Louvain la Neuve | Development Researche |
Year: 2010 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract n° EVA 2007/social LOT2 | EuropeAid/122888/C/SER/Multi | ref. 1282 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: impactBangladeshevaluationeducationBurkina FasoDominican Republicdevelopment aidEuropean Commission coordinationLiberiaNamibiaNigerPakistanprimary educationRepublic of South Africasecondary educationTanzaniaTunisia Uganda |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relationsEducational systems in general |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesDominican RepublicTunisiaTanzaniaUganda NamibiaSouth AfricaBurkina FasoLiberiaNigerBangladeshPakistan |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Joint Evaluation of the Cooperation of the European Commission, Belgium, Denmark, France and Luxembourg with Niger between 2000 - 2008 : Final report ; Volume 1 Main report ; Second revised edition |
---|
Title (other): Evaluation conjointe de la cooperation de la Commission Europeenne, de la Belgique, du Danemark, de la France et du Luxembourg avec le Niger 2000-2008 : Rapport final ; Volume 2 - Annexes | Annexe 3 Logiques d'intervention | Evaluation conjointe de la cooperation de la Commission Europeenne, de la Belgique, du Danemark, de la France et du Luxembourg avec le Niger 2000-2008 : Rapport final ; Annexe 7 - Rapports sectoriels et thématiques | Evaluation conjointe de la cooperation de la Commission Europeenne, de la Belgique, du Danemark, de la France et du Luxembourg avec le Niger 2000-2008 : Rapport final ; Volume 1 Rapport principal | Evaluation conjointe de la coopération de la Commission européenne, de la Belgique, du Danemark, de la France et du Luxembourg avec le Niger - 2000 à 2008 : Ref. 1278 ; EVINFO |
Abstract In 2007, five donors (European Commission, Belgium, Denmark, France and Luxembourg) decided to work together to evaluate their cooperation with Niger over the 2000-2008 period. Together, the five Donors taking part in the evaluation (DPE) accounted for more than half the Official Development Assistance (ODA) delivered to Niger over the period.Because it is a joint evaluation, specific aspects had to be taken into account: the aim was not to assess the individual performance of each DPE but to analyse the conception, implementation and effects of their joint action. Two analytical frameworks have been used to achieve this:An analysis of the implementation of the Paris Declaration Commitments, focusing on the cooperation process, and the relationship between the aid partners in particular (DPE-Government on the one hand, between DPEs on the other).The evaluation criteria of the Development Assistance Committee (DAC), which help assess the collective performance of DPEs by analysing their aims, resources, achievements, results and impacts.The evaluation is structured on the basis of these two analysis frameworks. It deals with the strategic cooperation frameworks between each DPE and the Government of Niger, as well as their priorities and interventions in a selection of sectors (rural development, water and sanitation, transport, culture, craft industry, health, education and training, macroeconomic support), taking into account cross-cutting issues (regional development, environment, gender issues, demographics and youth issues). The evaluation is also based on an extensive document review, field visits to selected sites in Niger, and on a survey about the perception of development aid in Niger, led concomitantly by the Laboratory for the Study and Research on Social Dynamics and Local Development (LASDEL). [Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents LIST OF ACRONYMS SUMMARY 1. MANDATE OF THE EVALUATION 1.1. A joint evaluation 1.2. Scope of evaluation 1.4. Parallel perception survey by LASDEL 2. METHODOLOGY 2.1. Strengths of the evaluation 2.2. Weaknesses of the evaluation 3. DEVELOPMENT CHALLENGES IN NIGER 3.1. Geography and climate 3.1.1. A vast, land-locked country bordered by Nigeria 3.1.2. A harsh, instable and deteriorating agro-climatic context 3.2. Population and poverty 3.2.1. One of the highest population growth rates in the world 3.2.2. Chronic food insecurity 3.2.3. One of the poorest populations in the world, facing a worsening situation 3.2.4. Rural economy in permanent crisis 3.2.5. Mining products, an asset which is still not used to its full potential 3.2.6. A very low level of education 3.2.7. Less developed migration trends than in some other Sahelian countries 3.2.8. Niger belongs to a solid monetary area... Is it too solid? 3.2.9. Close economic integration with Nigeria and other coastal countries 3.2.10. Economic integration hindered by an insufficient transport network 3.3. The Nigerien State 3.3.1. The political stability experienced during the period of evaluation has recently been undermined 3.3.2. A decentralisation process which is still in its early stages and not very advanced 3.3.3. A better controlled State budget, but which still depends a lot on foreign aid 3.3.4. More formal policies 3.4. SWOT analysis 4. GOVERNMENT STRATEGIES AND DPE RESPONSES 4.1. Nigers Poverty Reduction Strategy, a framework to adapt to development challenges 4.2. General strategies of the DPEs with Niger 4.2.1. Belgium 4.2.2. European Commission 4.2.3. France 4.2.4. Denmark 4.2.5. Luxembourg 4.3. Financial commitments of the DPEs in Niger 4.3.1. Weight of aid granted by DPEs in Niger 4.3.2. Regional distribution of aid by the DPEs in Niger | 4.3.3. Sectoral distribution of aid by the DPEs in Niger 5. ANALYSIS 5.1. An approach based on 11 evaluation questions 5.2. Two complementary analysis frameworks 5.3. First analysis framework: Implementation of the Paris Declaration Commitments 5.3.1. Paris Declaration: implied hypotheses 5.3.2. The concept of cooperation area 5.3.3. The cooperation cycle 5.3.4. What deductions can be made regarding the Paris Declaration Commitments? 5.4. Second analysis framework: the DAC evaluation criteria 5.4.1. Relevance 5.4.2. Coherence 5.4.3. Effectiveness 5.4.4. Impact 5.4.5. Sustainability 5.4.6. Efficiency 6. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS | Volume II: Annexes ANNEXE 1. TERMES DE RÉFÉRENCE ANNEXE 2. METHODOLOGIE ET CONCEPTS ANNEXE 3. LOGIQUES DINTERVENTION ANNEXE 4. LES ENJEUX DE DEVELOPPEMENT DU NIGER ANNEXE 5. ENGAGEMENTS FINANCIERS DES DPE AU NIGER : ANALYSE SECTORIELLE ET REGIONALE ANNEXE 6. AUTRES COOPERATIONS SIGNIFICATIVES AU NIGER ANNEXE 7. RAPPORTS SECTORIELS ANNEXE 8. REPONSE AUX QUESTIONS DEVALUATION ANNEXE 9. FOCUS GROUPS ORGANISES DANS LE CADRE DE LA MISSION DE TERRAIN ANNEXE 10. BIBLIOGRAPHIE ANNEXE 11. MEMBRE DE LEQUIPE DE CONSULTANTS ET DU COMITE DE GESTION |
Author (Corp. Body): Société dEtudes et dEvaluation sarl |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission | Belgien | Dänemark | Frankreich | Luxembourg | baastel | Institut de Recherches dApplications des Me?thodes de De?veloppement, Paris | Dnet Consult |
Year: 2010 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Ref. 1278 |
Language: en | fr |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: trainingBelgiumevaluationeducationDenmarkdemographydevelopment aidEU European CommissionFrancegender mainstreaminghealth policyhandicraft tradeyouth policycooperationculturerural developmentLuxembourg macroeconomicsNigerenvironmental policytrafficeconomics of water supply and distribution |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesDenmarkBelgiumFranceLuxembourgNiger |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Exploring the potential for improving the existing European coordination mechanisms in Fragile States : Study based on country case-studies ; Terms of Reference |
---|
Abstract The paper highlights the importance of a stronger commitment to more effective European coordination on the field in the context of crisis and fragility. It aims at presenting a first analysis of the characteristics that are specific to situations of crisis and fragility and the needs encountered on the field in order to draw recommendations for coordination among European actors that are better suited to Fragile States.[Author vide copyright] |
Author (Corp. Body): Practitioners ? Network for European Development Cooperation |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Internationale Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung |
Year: 2016 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: development aid policyEUHaitiCongocoordinationcrisis interventioncrisis management (econ., pol.)Niger Palestinian territories |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesHaitiNigerDemocratic Republic of the CongoPalestinian Territory |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
« Previous
Next »