Suche nach Schlagworten '00006764'

5 entries found on 1 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 5

Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),

« Previous
Next »
Title: Evaluation of voter education in the context of EU electoral support : final report
Title (other): + FICHE CONTRADICTOIRE
Author: Kenny, Karen | Lagueny, Sophie | Burban, Florence
Contributer: PARTICIP GmbH
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid
Year: 2001
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: BangladeshElectionPeru
Subject: International cooperationEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesPeruBangladesh
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of the EU Support to Research and Innovation for Development in Partner Countries (2007 - 2013) : Final
Report ; Volume 1 – Main Report
Title (other): Evaluation of the EU Support to Research and Innovation for Development in Partner Countries (2007 - 2013) : Final
Report ; Volume 2 – Sector Evaluation Matrices | Evaluation of the EU Support to Research and Innovation for
Development in Partner Countries (2007 - 2013) : Final Report ; Volume 3 – ANNEXES 1 TO 8 | Evaluation of the EU
Support to Research and Innovation for Development in Partner Countries (2007 - 2013) : Final Report ; Volume 4 – ANNEX
9 | Evaluation of the EU Support to Research and Innovation for Development in Partner Countries (2007 - 2013) :
Executive Summary | Evaluation de l’Appui de l’UE à la Recherche et l’Innovation pour le Développement dans les
Pays Partenaires (2007 - 2013) : Résumé
Abstract
This evaluation examined the support the European Commission’s DG for Development and International Cooperation (DEVCO) provided to Research and Innovation (R&I) in partner countries during the last EU budget period (2007-2013).[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
1 Introduction
1.1 Mandate and scope of the evaluation
1.2 Structure of the report
2 Key methodological steps
2.1 Overall methodological approach
2.2 Selection of country, regions and interventions
2.3 Survey to EU Delegations
2.4 Challenges and limitations
3 Overall policy framework of the EU strategy in relation to Research and Innovation
3.1 General framework
3.2 International co-operation on Research and Innovation
3.3 Development and R&I
4 The intended intervention logics of EU support to Research and Innovation in partner countries
4.1 The intervention logic diagrams for DG DEVCO and DG RTD FP7
4.2 The different levels of the reconstructed DG DEVCO intervention logic
4.3 The different levels of the intervention logic for DG RTD FP7
5 Inventory analysis
5.1 Methodological limits and challenges
5.2 Main findings
5.3 Total and sector commitments
5.4 Geographic distribution
5.5 Distribution by domain
5.6 Distribution by channel of delivery
6 Answers to the evaluation questions
6.1 EQ 1: Development policy objectives
6.2 EQ 2: Impact on partner country research communities
6.3 EQ 3: Instruments and modalities
6.4 EQ 4: DEVCO-RTD complementarity and coherence
6.5 EQ 5: Transfer of R&I results into development processes
6.6 EQ 6: EU capacities
7 Overall assessment
8 Conclusions
8.1 Policy and strategic focus
8.2 Operational approach
8.3 Complementarity with other EU services
8.4 Results
9 Recommendations
9.1 Policy and strategy focus
9.2 Operational approach
9.3 Complementarity with other EU services
9.4 Results
| VOLUME 2 – SECTOR EVALUATION MATRICES
1. Part A – Food Security, Nutrition and Agriculture
2. Part B – Health
3. Part C – Environment and Climate Change
4. Part D – Science, Information Society and Space
VOLUME 3 –ANNEX 1 TO 8
1. Annex 1 – Terms of reference
2. Annex 2 – Inventory
3. Annex 3 – Case studies
4. Annex 4 – Survey to EU Delegations
5. Annex 5 – Final evaluation matrix
6. Annex 6 – List of persons interviewed
7. Annex 7 – Bibliography
8. Annex 8 – Methodology
VOLUME 4 – ANNEX 9: COUNTRY NOTES
1. Burkina Faso
2. Ethiopia
3. India
4. Kenya
5. Mauritius
6. Peru
7. South Africa
8. Tunisia
9. Ukraine
10. Vietnam
Author (Corp. Body): PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt, Freiburg im Breisgau
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Internationale Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung, Brüssel
Year: 2016
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract No EVA 2011/Lot 1 | Specific contract No 2013/330982
Language: en | fr
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EthiopiaevaluationBurkina Fasodevelopment aidEUresearch and developmentrealization of research resultsIndia
innovationKenyacooperationpartnershipPeruRepublic of South AfricaTunisiaUkraineVietnam
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relationsResearch
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesUkrainePeruTunisiaEthiopia
KenyaMauritiusSouth AfricaBurkina FasoIndiaVietnam
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Post-2015: Global action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future : Full report
Title (other): Post-2015: Global action for an Inclusive and Sustainable Future : Executive Summary
Abstract
This independent report – with the wealth and breadth of knowledge it puts forward and the quality of the analysis it presents – gives us a research-based perspective on the post-2015 challenges we face.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Boxes, figures & tables
Abbreviations
Working definitions of key terms
Executive summary
Introduction
...
Part I. Keeping the promise of the Millennium declaration
Chapter 1. Lessons from the MDG Experience
...
Chapter2. What the MDGs have meant for poor countries - Four case studies
...
Chapter 3. The European Union and the MDGs
...
Part II. The changing context for a new global development framework
Chapter 4.The changing global community
...
Chapter 5. Changes in the understanding of global poverty
...
Chapter 6. Future challenges - some trends and projections
...
Part III. Drivers of the global partnership for development
Chapter 7. Money: development of finance
...
Chapter 8. Goods: Trade and investment
...
Chapter 9. People: Labour migration
...
Conclusions and recommendations
Chapter 10. Constructing the Post-2015 Agenda
References
Annexes
Annex 1 - List of MDG indicators
Annex 2 - Country case studies
1. Nepal
2. Rwanda
3. Cote d'Ivoire
4. Peru
Annex 3 - Core principles for investment policy-making for sustainable development
Series Title:European Report on Development ; 2013
Author (Corp. Body): European Centre for Development Policy Management | Overseas Development Institute, London | Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, Berlin
Contributer: Europäische Kommission
Publisher: Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen, Luxemburg
Year: 2013
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978-92-79-28772-5 | 1977-3994 | MN-AB-13-001-EN-C | 978-92-79-28787-9 | 1977-916X | MN-AD-13-001-EN-C
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: labor migrationpovertyIvory Coastdevelopment aid policyEUfinancial planningglobalizationcommerce
investmentNepalpartnershipPeruRwanda
Subject: Development aid. Aid programmes and aid organizationsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Global ResourcesEurope. General ResourcesPeruRwandaIvory CoastNepal
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Thematic global evaluation of the Commission support to decentralisation processes : Final Report ; Volume 1
Title (other): Thematic global evaluation of the Commission support to decentralisation processes : Final Report ; Volume 2a | Thematic
global evaluation of the Commission support to decentralisation processes : Final Report ; Volume 2b | Thematic global
evaluation of the Commission support to decentralisation processes : Final Report ; Volume 2c | Fiche Contradictoire :
Evaluation of the Commission of the European Union support to decentralisation processes | Quality Grid : Evaluation of
"EC support to decentralisation processes" ; Final report | Thematic Evaluation of the European Commission Support to
Decentralisation processes
Abstract
This Final Report presents the outcome of the “Thematic global evaluation of the Commission support to decentralisation processes”. The Evaluation was commissioned by the DG DEVCO Evaluation Unit and was implemented between January 2010 and February 2012.The purpose of the evaluation is to identify key relevant lessons and to provide recommendations to help ensure opportune and timely support to decentralisation processes.The evaluation covers EC aid delivery over the period 2000-2009 (within the context of the programmes managed by DG DEVCO).The evaluation aims to assess to what extent the EC assistance has been relevant, coherent, effective, efficient and sustainable in providing the expected impacts in the support of decentralisation processes, along with the EU added value. Moreover, it aims to analyse the coherence with the relevant EU policies and the partner governments' priorities and activities.In terms of geographical scope, the evaluation covers all regions where EC cooperation has been implemented ? including countries where the partnership between the government and the EU has been difficult ? but does not include regions and countries under the mandate of DG Enlargement, the OECD countries, and activities that fall under the responsibility of the EC Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection department.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
1 Introduction
1.1 Synthesis of the EC strategy and programmes
1.2 The Evaluation Questions
2 Methodology
2.1 Key steps of the evaluation process
2.2 Developing the methodological framework (structuring phase)
2.3 Collecting data (Desk Study and Field Phase): Overview of process and tools
2.4 Analysing and judging: Synthesis Phase
2.5 Dissemination
2.6 Challenges and limits of the evaluation
3 Answers to the Evaluation Questions
3.1 EQ1: Policy framework
3.2 EQ2: Institutional capacity
3.3 EQ3: National context
3.4 EQ4: 3Cs
3.5 EQ5: Transfer of functions and resources
3.6 EQ6: Stakeholders? capacities
3.7 EQ7: Local governance
3.8 EQ8: Service delivery
3.9 Overall assessment of the EC Strategy
4 Conclusions and recommendations
4.1 Conclusions
4.2 Recommendations
List of tables
List of figures
List of boxes
List of acronyms
| VOLUME IIA: ANNEX 1 - DETAILED INFORMATION MATRIX
1. EQ1: Policy framework
2. EQ2: Institutional capacity
3. EQ3: National context
4. EQ4: 3Cs
5. EQ5: Transfer of functions & resources
6. EQ6: Stakeholders’ capacities
7. EQ7: Local governance
8. EQ8: Service delivery
VOLUME IIB: ANNEX 2 TO 10
1. Annex 2: Terms of Reference
2. Annex 3: Inventory
3. Annex 4: Results of the survey to EU Delegations
4. Annex 5: MTRs & JARs analysis
5. Annex 6: CSP analysis
6. Annex 7: CSE analysis
7. Annex 8: ROM analysis
8. Annex 9: Evaluation Matrix
9. Annex 10: List of People Interviewed
VOLUME IIC: ANNEXE 11 - COUNTRY NOTES
1. Benin
2. Honduras
3. Lebanon
4. Mali
5. Peru
6. The Philippines
7. Rwanda
8. Sierra Leone
9. South Africa
10. Tanzania
Author (Corp. Body): PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt, Freiburg im Breisgau
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | ADE | DRN | Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, Berlin | European Centre for Development Policy Management | Overseas Devel
Year: 2012
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Ref.: EuropeAid/122888/C/SER/Multi | Request for Service: 2009/226838
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: Beninevaluationdecentralizationdevelopment aidEUEuropean Commissionfinancial assistanceHonduras
LebanonMaliPeruPhilippinesRepublic of South AfricaRwandaSierra LeoneTanzania
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesHondurasPeruRwandaTanzaniaSouth Africa
BeninMaliSierra LeoneLebanonPhilippines
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of EC aid delivery through Civil society organisations : Final Report ; Volume 1
Title (other): Evaluation of EC aid delivery through Civil society organisations : Final Report ; Volume 2 | Evaluation of EC aid
delivery through Civil society organisations : Final Report ; Volume 3 | Fiche contradictoire : Evaluation of EC aid
delivery through civil society organisations | Qualtiy Assessment grid : Evaluation of EC Aid delivery through civil
society organisations | Evaluation of the EC aid channelled through civil society organisations (CSOs) : Ref. 1259 ;
EVINFO
Abstract
The purpose of this evaluation, covering the period 2000-2006, is to provide the relevant external co-operation services of the European Commission (EC) and wider public with an independent evaluation of the EC aid channelled through civil society. The specific objectives of this forward looking evaluation are: • to assess to what extent aid delivered through civil society organisations (CSOs) is in line with stated EC policy objectives; • to assess where lies the added value of aid delivered through CSOs (in different geographical and political contexts); • to assess the impact and sustainability of external co-operation through civil society; • to provide lessons learnt and recommendations for the continued support of CSOs within the present context and relevant commitments (such as the European Consensus and the Paris Declaration)...[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Purpose of the Evaluation
1.2. Scope of the Evaluation and period covered
2. METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH
2.1. General approach
2.2. Limitations
3. SETTING THE SCENE: EC OBJECTIVES AND THE CSO CHANNEL
3.1. Brief historic overview
3.2. Fundamental shift in EC policies towards CSOs
3.3. The growing debate on channels of aid delivery
3.4. Looking at the civil society channel as a ‘living system’
4. ANSWERS TO THE EVALUATION QUESTIONS
4.1. EVALUATION QUESTION 1: To what extent and how has the EC defined the rationale for delivering aid through CSOs in different political, geographical and thematic contexts?
4.2. EVALUATION QUESTION 2: To what extent has the EC made clear choices at the programming level with regard to delivering aid through CSOs in country/regional strategy papers; in (post-) conflict situations/failed states/or difficult partnerships;as well as in sectoral and thematic priority areas of intervention?
4.3. EVALUATION QUESTION 3: To what extent and how has European Commission aid channeled through CSOs been consistent with stated policy objectives or programming choices regarding CSO roles (including service delivery in the context of poverty reduction strategies and advocacy work)?
4.4. EVALUATION QUESTION 4: To what extent and how has EC aid channeled through CSOs been consistent with stated policy objectives regarding actors to be supported as well as approaches and instruments to be used?
4.5. EVALUATION QUESTION 5: To what extent and how has European Commission aid delivered through CSOs been consistent with relevant new commitments related to the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness, particularly with regard to capacity development of CSOs in the context of sector and budget support?
4.6. EVALUATION QUESTION 6: To what extent and how have European Commission strategies, programmes and projects, delivered through CSOs, contributed to achieving key EC/EU development objectives?
| 4.7. EVALUATION QUESTION 7: To what extent and how did European Commission strategies, programmes and projects, delivered through CSOs, provide an appropriate development response in (post-)conflict situations/fragile states/’difficult partnerships?
4.8. EVALUATION QUESTION 8: To what extent are the European Commission management systems (in terms of programming modalities; funding modalities and procedures; monitoring mechanisms) adapted to the needs of using CSOs as an aid delivery channel?
5. OVERALL ASSESSMENT, CONCLUSIONS AND LESSONS LEARNT
5.1. Overall assessment (all EQs combined)
5.2. Main conclusions
5.3. Key lessons learnt
6. RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1. OVERALL RECOMMENDATION
6.2. POLITICAL RECOMMENDATIONS
6.3. STRATEGIC AND OPERATIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS
6.4. PROCESS RECOMMENDATIONS
| VOLUME 2: ANNEXES
ANNEX I: ToRs
ANNEX II: Description of regional agreements
ANNEX III: Various regional impact diagrams
ANNEX IV: Description of budget lines
ANNEX V: CSP analysis
ANNEX VI: ROM analysis
ANNEX VII: Questionnaire analysis
ANNEX VIII: Mapping of financial flows
ANNEX IX: Minutes of Focus Groups
ANNEX X: Evaluation questions, judgement criteria and indicators
ANNEX XI: Background Information on EC objectives and the CSO channel
ANNEX XII: Detailed Recommendations
ANNEX XIII: Selected bibliography
ANNEX XIV: Consistency table: Findings Æ conclusions Æ recommendations
VOLUME 3: COUNTRY NOTES
Benin
Cambodia
Georgia
Lebanon
Peru
Somalia
Author (Corp. Body): PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | CIDEAL | Channel Research Ltd. | South Research
Year: 2008
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract Number: EVA/116-833 | Ref. 1259
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: Beninevaluationdevelopment aidEUEuropean CommissionGeorgiaCambodiaconflict situation
cooperationLebanonorganizationsPeruSomaliacivil society
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesPeruSomaliaBeninGeorgia
LebanonCambodia
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
« Previous
Next »
Copyright (C) 2003-2019 European Documentation Centres / Update: 09.10.2019