Suche nach Schlagworten '00006810'

4 entries found on 1 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 4

Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),

« Previous
Next »
Title: Thematic global evaluation of the Commission support to decentralisation processes : Final Report ; Volume 1
Title (other): Thematic global evaluation of the Commission support to decentralisation processes : Final Report ; Volume 2a | Thematic
global evaluation of the Commission support to decentralisation processes : Final Report ; Volume 2b | Thematic global
evaluation of the Commission support to decentralisation processes : Final Report ; Volume 2c | Fiche Contradictoire :
Evaluation of the Commission of the European Union support to decentralisation processes | Quality Grid : Evaluation of
"EC support to decentralisation processes" ; Final report | Thematic Evaluation of the European Commission Support to
Decentralisation processes
Abstract
This Final Report presents the outcome of the “Thematic global evaluation of the Commission support to decentralisation processes”. The Evaluation was commissioned by the DG DEVCO Evaluation Unit and was implemented between January 2010 and February 2012.The purpose of the evaluation is to identify key relevant lessons and to provide recommendations to help ensure opportune and timely support to decentralisation processes.The evaluation covers EC aid delivery over the period 2000-2009 (within the context of the programmes managed by DG DEVCO).The evaluation aims to assess to what extent the EC assistance has been relevant, coherent, effective, efficient and sustainable in providing the expected impacts in the support of decentralisation processes, along with the EU added value. Moreover, it aims to analyse the coherence with the relevant EU policies and the partner governments' priorities and activities.In terms of geographical scope, the evaluation covers all regions where EC cooperation has been implemented ? including countries where the partnership between the government and the EU has been difficult ? but does not include regions and countries under the mandate of DG Enlargement, the OECD countries, and activities that fall under the responsibility of the EC Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection department.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
1 Introduction
1.1 Synthesis of the EC strategy and programmes
1.2 The Evaluation Questions
2 Methodology
2.1 Key steps of the evaluation process
2.2 Developing the methodological framework (structuring phase)
2.3 Collecting data (Desk Study and Field Phase): Overview of process and tools
2.4 Analysing and judging: Synthesis Phase
2.5 Dissemination
2.6 Challenges and limits of the evaluation
3 Answers to the Evaluation Questions
3.1 EQ1: Policy framework
3.2 EQ2: Institutional capacity
3.3 EQ3: National context
3.4 EQ4: 3Cs
3.5 EQ5: Transfer of functions and resources
3.6 EQ6: Stakeholders? capacities
3.7 EQ7: Local governance
3.8 EQ8: Service delivery
3.9 Overall assessment of the EC Strategy
4 Conclusions and recommendations
4.1 Conclusions
4.2 Recommendations
List of tables
List of figures
List of boxes
List of acronyms
| VOLUME IIA: ANNEX 1 - DETAILED INFORMATION MATRIX
1. EQ1: Policy framework
2. EQ2: Institutional capacity
3. EQ3: National context
4. EQ4: 3Cs
5. EQ5: Transfer of functions & resources
6. EQ6: Stakeholders’ capacities
7. EQ7: Local governance
8. EQ8: Service delivery
VOLUME IIB: ANNEX 2 TO 10
1. Annex 2: Terms of Reference
2. Annex 3: Inventory
3. Annex 4: Results of the survey to EU Delegations
4. Annex 5: MTRs & JARs analysis
5. Annex 6: CSP analysis
6. Annex 7: CSE analysis
7. Annex 8: ROM analysis
8. Annex 9: Evaluation Matrix
9. Annex 10: List of People Interviewed
VOLUME IIC: ANNEXE 11 - COUNTRY NOTES
1. Benin
2. Honduras
3. Lebanon
4. Mali
5. Peru
6. The Philippines
7. Rwanda
8. Sierra Leone
9. South Africa
10. Tanzania
Author (Corp. Body): PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt, Freiburg im Breisgau
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | ADE | DRN | Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, Berlin | European Centre for Development Policy Management | Overseas Devel
Year: 2012
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Ref.: EuropeAid/122888/C/SER/Multi | Request for Service: 2009/226838
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: Beninevaluationdecentralizationdevelopment aidEUEuropean Commissionfinancial assistanceHonduras
LebanonMaliPeruPhilippinesRepublic of South AfricaRwandaSierra LeoneTanzania
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesHondurasPeruRwandaTanzaniaSouth Africa
BeninMaliSierra LeoneLebanonPhilippines
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Thematic evaluation of the European Commission support to the health sector : Final Report ; Volume I
Title (other): Thematic evaluation of the European Commission support to the health sector : Final Report ; Volume IIa | Thematic
evaluation of the European Commission support to the health sector : Final Report ; Volume IIb | Thematic evaluation of
the European Commission support to the health sector : Final Report ; Volume IIc | Thematic evaluation of the European
Commission support to the health sector : Final Report ; Volume IId | Thematic evaluation of the European Commission
support to the health sector : Final Report ; Volume IIe | Fiche Contradictoire : Thematic evaluation of the European
Commission support to the health sector ; Ref. Ares(2014)2001203 | Quality Grid : Thematic evaluation of the European
Commission's support to the health sector ; Final Report (August 2012) | Evaluation of the EU Support of the Health
Sector : Ref. 1308 ; EVINFO
Abstract
This final report presents the outcome of the “Thematic evaluation of EC support to the health sector”. It was commissioned by the Evaluation Unit of DG DEVCO and implemented between January 2011 and May 2012.The evaluation provides an independent assessment of the European Commission’s (EC’s) past and current support to the health sector by looking at the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability of the EC support provided. It also assesses the coherence of EC health support with other EC/European Union (EU) and donor policies and activities, as well as the specific EC added value within the health sector. The evaluation ultimately aims at identifying relevant key lessons, in order to provide recommendations for future EC support.The evaluation covers EC aid delivery over the period 2002 to 2010, including all geographical programmes (EDF, DCI, ENPI and predeces-sors) and thematic budget lines. It comprises all countries under the mandate of DG DEVCO and assesses every aid modality used in the health sector, including Sector Budget Support (SBS) and General Budget Support (GBS), as well as funds channelled through multilateral organisations or global initiatives, such as the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM) or the Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunisation (GAVI).[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
1 Introduction
1.1 Overall objective and scope of the evaluation
1.2 Structure of the final report
2 Methodology
2.1 Key steps of the evaluation process
2.2 Challenges and limitations
3 Background and context of EC support to the health sector
3.1 Current international development co-operation and health sector framework
3.2 EC strategy and support to the health sector over the period 2002-2010
4 Inventory: Overview on EC resources to support health
4.1 EC support to health between 2002 and 2010: Global overview
4.2 Direct support to the health sector
4.3 EC ‘indirect’ support to the health sector: General Budget Support
5 Answers to the Evaluation Questions
5.1 EQ1: To what extent has EC support contributed to enhancing the quality of health services?
5.2 EQ2: To what extent has EC support to health contributed to increasing affordability of health care, especially for the poor?
5.3 EQ3: To what extent has EC support contributed to improving geographical availability of health facilities especially for the poor?
5.4 EQ4: To what extent has EC support to health contributed to improving health service utilisation related to MNCH?
5.5 EQ5- To what extent has EC support to health contributed to strengthening the management and governance of the health system?
5.6 EQ 6: To what extent and how has the EC contributed to strengthening government-led co-ordination, complementarity and synergies with Member States and other donors in the health sector, in line with the Paris Declaration? (national, regional and global levels)
5.7 EQ7: To what extent have the various financing modalities (GBS, SBS, other sector support, projects), funding channels and instruments and their combinations, been appropriate, thus contributing to improving access to, equity of and policy-based resource allocation in health?
5.8 Overall assessment of EC strategy
6 Conclusions and recommendations
6.1 Conclusions
6.2 Recommendations
List of tables
| VOLUME IIa: DETAILED PRELIMINARY ANSWERS TO THE EVALUATION QUESTIONS
Annex 1: Detailed preliminary answers to the Evaluation Questions
VOLUME IIB : MAIN INDIVIDUAL ANALYSIS
Annex 2: Inventory
Annex 3: Results of survey to EU Delegations
Annex 4: CSP analysis
Volume IIc: Country case studies and thematic case studies Country case studies
Annex 5: Burkina Faso
Annex 6: Democratic Republic of Congo
Annex 7: Ghana
Annex 8: South Africa
Annex 9: Zambia
Annex 10: Egypt
Annex 11: Moldova
Volume IId: Country case studies and thematic case studies (continued)
Annex 12: Afghanistan
Annex 13: Bangladesh
Annex 14: Philippines
Annex 15: Lao PDR
Annex 16: Ecuador
Thematic case studies
Annex 17: The European Commission and the Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria (GFATM)
Annex 18: EC support to the health sector in fragile states
Annex 19: The European Commission and Global Public Goods (GPG) for Health
Volume IIe: Terms of References, Definitions and Methodological remarks, References
Annex 20: Terms of References
Annex 21: Evaluation Matrix
Annex 22: Methodology and tools used for the evaluation
Annex 23: Overview of sources used per indicator
Annex 24: Selection criteria and ranking for the 12 country case studies
Annex 25: Overview of selected interventions in the 12 case study countries
Annex 26: Overview of Budget Support operations in the 25 desk study countries
Annex 27: Statistical tables
Annex 28: Specific features of EC support to health in partner country regions
Annex 29: Consideration of cross-cutting issues in EC policies to the health sector
Annex 30: List of People Interviewed
Annex 31: Documents consulted
Author (Corp. Body): PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt, Freiburg im Breisgau
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Egeval II | DRN | Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, Berlin | European Centre for Development Policy Management | Overseas
Year: 2012
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: EuropeAid/122888/C/SER/Multi | Contract n° EVA 2007/social LOT2 | Ares(2014)2001203 | Ref. 1308
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EgyptAfghanistanAIDSBangladeshevaluationBurkina FasoEcuadordevelopment aid
EUhealth policyGhanavaccinationCongoLaosPhilippinesRepublic of South AfricaZambia
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relationsMedical care. Health control
Countries Scheme: Global ResourcesEurope. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of the European Commission’s Cooperation with the Philippines : Final Report ; Volume 1
Title (other): Evaluation of the European Commission’s Cooperation with the Philippines : Final Report ; Volume 2 | Fiche
Contradictoire : Evaluation of the Commission’s support to the Philippines ; Ref. Ares(2013)2946473 | Quality Grid :
Philippines Country Level Evaluation ; Final Report, June 2011 | Evaluation of the European Commission cooperation with
the Philippines : Summary of the main conclusions and recommendations ; Ref. Ares(2012)338875
Abstract
The evaluation of the Commission’s co-operation with the Philippines is part of the 2009 evaluation programme as approved by External Relations and Development Commissioners and aiming at ensuring accountability for the management of the allocated funds as well as promoting a lesson-learning culture throughout the organisation.The main objectives of the evaluation are: to provide the relevant external co-operation services of the European Commission and the wider public with an overall independent assessment of the Commission’s past and current cooperation relations with the Philippines (2002-2009); and to identify key lessons in order to improve the current and future strategies and programmes of the Commission.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
1 Introduction
1.1 Purpose of the evaluation
1.2 Evaluation Process
2 Country Context
3 EU Strategic Objectives and Priorities in the Philippines
3.1 Global EU development policy strategic objectives and priorities
3.2 ALA regulations (1996-2006)
3.3 DCI regulations (2007-2013)
3.4 Regional strategic objectives and priorities
3.5 EU Strategic Objectives and Priorities in the Philippines: Overview
3.6 The First Country Strategy Paper, 2002-2006
3.7 The Second Country Strategy Paper 2007-2013
3.8 Regional programmes in the Philippines
3.9 Thematic / horizontal funding in the Philippines
3.10 Partnership Cooperation Agreement
3.11 Detailed Intervention Logic
4 Findings
4.1 EQ1 – To what extent has the EU cooperation programme in the Philippines been designed and implemented with a view to addressing the needs of the poorest/vulnerable groups?
4.1.1 Findings by JC
4.1.2 Synthesised EQ Answer:
4.1.3 Conclusions:
4.1.4 Recommendations:
4.2 EQ2 – To what extent has EU support to the Philippine Health Sector Programme contributed to an improved provision of basic health care services?
4.2.1 Findings by JC:
4.2.2 Synthesised EQ Answer:
4.2.3 Conclusions:
4.2.4 Recommendations
4.3 EQ3 – To what extent has EU support in the area of rural development contributed to improved living standards for the poor?
4.3.1 Findings by JC:
4.3.2 Synthesised EQ Answer
4.3.3 Conclusions
4.3.4 Recommendations
4.4 EQ4 – To what extent has EU support contributed to improved trade and economic partnership with the Philippines and the country’s further integration into the international trade system?
| 4.4.1 Findings by JC:
4.4.2 Synthesised EQ Answer:
4.4.3 Conclusions
4.4.4 Recommendations
4.5 EQ5 – To what extent has the EU support promoted and strengthened better governance?
4.5.1 Findings by JC:
4.5.2 Progress made in the major clusters supported through EU programmes
4.5.3 Conclusions:
4.5.4 Recommendations:
4.6 EQ6 – To what extent was the EU’s mix of financing instruments and aid modalities appropriate to the national context and EU cooperation objectives?
4.6.1 Findings by JC:
4.6.2 Synthesised EQ Answer:
4.6.3 Conclusions
4.6.4 Recommendations:
5 General Conclusions and Recommendations
Volume II
Annex 1: List of Documents Consulted
Annex 2: Overview of Evaluation Questions
Annex 3: List of contacts
3.1. List of contacts for the field phase
3.2. List of people met during the field phase
Annex 4: Country Context
| Annex 5: EU Strategic Objectives and Priorities in the Philippines
5.1. Global EU development policy strategic objectives and priorities
5.2. ALA regulations (1996-2006)
5.3. DCI regulations (2007-2013)
5.4. Regional strategic objectives and priorities
5.5. EU Strategic Objectives and Priorities in the Philippines: Overview
5.6.The First Country Strategy Paper, 2002-2006
5.7. The Second Country Strategy Paper 2007-2013
5.8. Regional programmes in the Philippines
5.9. Thematic / horizontal funding in the Philippines
Annex 6: Information Matrix
EQ1 Poverty/Vulnerable Groups - To what extent has the EU cooperation programme in the Philippines been designed and implemented with a view to addressing the needs of the poorest/vulnerable groups?
EQ2 Health - To what extent has EU support to the Philippine Health Sector Programme contributed to an improved provision of basic health care services?
EQ3 Rural Development - To what extent has EU support in the area of rural development contributed to improved living standards for the poor?
EQ4 Trade - To what extent has EU support contributed to improved trade and economic partnership with the Philippines and the country’s further integration into the international trade system?
EQ5 Governance - To what extent has the EU support promoted and strengthened better governance?
EQ6 Mix of Instruments - To what extent was the EU’s mix of financing instruments and aid modalities appropriate to the national context and EU cooperation objectives?
Annex 7: Geography of the European Commission’s interventions in the Philippines
Annex 8: Overview of evaluation methodology
8.1. Tools for the Inception Phase
8.2. Tools for the desk phase
8.3. Tools for the field phase
8.4. The synthesis phase
Annex 9: Summary of Seminar in the Philippines
Annex 10: Terms of References
Author (Corp. Body): PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt, Freiburg im Breisgau
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | DRN | Aide a? la De?cision Economique, Ottignies Louvain la Neuve | Overseas Development Institute, London | EURASIA | Instituto C
Year: 2011
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: EuropeAid/122888/C/SER/Multi | 2009/223108 | Ref. Ares(2013)2946473
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: povertyevaluationdevelopment aidEUEuropean Commissionfinancial assistancehealth care delivery systemgovernance
commercecooperationrural developmentPhilippineseconomic policy
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesPhilippines
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation on the Abolition of Death Penalty Projects : European Initiative for Democracy and Human Rights
Abstract
The present report is an evaluation of the projects aiming at the abolition of the death penalty (ADP), financed under the European Initiative on Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR). The evaluation, undertaken between November 2006 and February 2007, covers a portfolio of 28 projects, some dating back to 1994, whose total budget was approximately € 11,394,150.The evaluation’s overall objective is “to help the European Commission to improve the impact of EIDHR projects supporting civil society activities aiming at the abolition of death penalty, by strengthening the Commission's ability to draw on lessons learnt of past and ongoing interventions for future planning, programming and project identification.”[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1 LIMITATIONS
2. METHODOLOGY
2.1 DESK STUDY
2.2 PROJECT FILES
2.3 QUESTIONNAIRE
2.4 COUNTRY VISITS
2.5 LEAFLET FOR WORLD CONGRESS
3. THE PROJECTS
3.1 ANALYSIS OF PROJECT APPROACHES
3.1.1 EFFECTIVENESS OF DIFFERENT APPROACHES
3.2 ANALYSIS OF THE GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION OF PROJECTS
3.3 OVERVIEW OF COUNTRY-BASED AND REGIONAL PROJECTS
3.3.1 PROJECTS IN THE CARIBBEAN
3.3.2 PROJECT IN EUROPE
3.3.3 PROJECT IN IRAN
3.3.4 PROJECT IN CHINA
3.3.5 PROJECTS ON THE USA
3.3.6 PROJECT ON CENTRAL ASIA
3.3.7 PROJECT ON RWANDA
3.3.8 PROJECTS IN THE PHILIPPINES
3.4 OVERVIEW OF THEMATIC ASPECTS
3.4.1 PROJECTS ON INTERNATIONAL ADVOCACY
3.4.2 PROJECTS INVOLVING LEGAL RESEARCH
3.4.3 SCIENTIFIC APPROACHES
3.4.4 COALITION BUILDING
4. PROJECT DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION
4.1 PROJECT CYCLE
4.2 STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT
4.2.1 THE ROLE OF RELEX AND EUROPE AID IN EC STRATEGY DEVELOPMENT
4.2.2 GUIDELINES AND STRATEGY
4.2.3 EC DECENTRALISATION AND REGIONAL PROJECTS
4.2.4 IMPUNITY AND REPARATION: WORKING WITH VICTIMS’ REPRESENTATIVES
4.2.5 THE IMPORTANCE OF THE 2ND OPTIONAL PROTOCOL
4.2.6 NEGATIVE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES
4.2.7 POSITIVE UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES
4.3 PROJECT MONITORING ISSUES
4.3.1 THE ROLE OF EUROPE AID IN MONITORING WORLDWIDE PROJECTS
4.3.2 PAPER AND ELECTRONIC FILING
4.4 PROJECT MANAGEMENT
4.4.1 PROCEDURES
4.4.2 INDICATORS AND BENCHMARKS
4.4.3 SUSTAINABILITY
4.5 THE FUTURE EUROPEAN INSTRUMENT
4.5.1 COALITION BUILDING AND DEATH PENALTY PROJECTS
4.5.3 LINKING THE DEATH PENALTY WITH OTHER HUMAN RIGHTS ISSUES AND INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS
4.5.4 RESEARCH TENDERS AS AN ALTERNATIVE TO CALLS FOR PROPOSALS
4.5.5 SUPPORT TO PROJECTS IN DEVELOPED COUNTRIES
4.5.6 THE NEED FOR A EUROPE AID FOCAL POINT
5. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION
5.1.1 STRATEGY
| 5.1.2 COORDINATION WITH DELEGATION’S ACTIVITIES
5.1.3 MONITORING
5.1 4 REPORTING
5.1.5 COALITION-BUILDING AND SUSTAINABILITY
5.1.6 FOCAL POINT
5.2 RECOMMENDATIONS TO IMPLEMENTING ORGANISATIONS
5.2.1 STRATEGY
5.2.2 COORDINATION WITH DELEGATIONS AND EUROPEAID
ANNEXES
ANNEX 1: LIST OF PEOPLE MET
ANNEX 2: EVALUATION QUESTIONNAIRE
ANNEX 3: TERMS OF REFERENCE OF THE EVALUATION
ANNEX 4: OVERVIEW OF ADP PROJECTS FUNDED BY THE EC SINCE 1994
ANNEX 5: ANALYSIS OF PROJECT APPROACHES
Author: Robert, Pierre | Alberman, Daniel
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Ecorys | CESO CI | SOFRECO
Year: 2007
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: EUROPEAID/ 116548/C/SV | Lot nº 4: Sectorial and project evaluations | Request for services Nº 2006/128036
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: evaluationChinadevelopment aid policyEUEuropeIranCaribbean Regionhuman rights
Philippinesprojectproject planningRwandadeath penaltyCentral Asiacivil society
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relationsHuman rights
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesUSALatin America and Caribbean. General ResourcesRwandaIran
Central Asia. General ResourcesChinaPhilippines
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
« Previous
Next »
Copyright (C) 2003-2019 European Documentation Centres / Update: 09.10.2019