Suche nach Schlagworten '00008259'

2 entries found on 1 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 2

Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),

« Previous
Next »
Title: Evaluation of EC aid delivery through Civil society organisations : Final Report ; Volume 1
Title (other): Evaluation of EC aid delivery through Civil society organisations : Final Report ; Volume 2 | Evaluation of EC aid
delivery through Civil society organisations : Final Report ; Volume 3 | Fiche contradictoire : Evaluation of EC aid
delivery through civil society organisations | Qualtiy Assessment grid : Evaluation of EC Aid delivery through civil
society organisations | Evaluation of the EC aid channelled through civil society organisations (CSOs) : Ref. 1259 ;
EVINFO
Abstract
The purpose of this evaluation, covering the period 2000-2006, is to provide the relevant external co-operation services of the European Commission (EC) and wider public with an independent evaluation of the EC aid channelled through civil society. The specific objectives of this forward looking evaluation are: • to assess to what extent aid delivered through civil society organisations (CSOs) is in line with stated EC policy objectives; • to assess where lies the added value of aid delivered through CSOs (in different geographical and political contexts); • to assess the impact and sustainability of external co-operation through civil society; • to provide lessons learnt and recommendations for the continued support of CSOs within the present context and relevant commitments (such as the European Consensus and the Paris Declaration)...[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Purpose of the Evaluation
1.2. Scope of the Evaluation and period covered
2. METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH
2.1. General approach
2.2. Limitations
3. SETTING THE SCENE: EC OBJECTIVES AND THE CSO CHANNEL
3.1. Brief historic overview
3.2. Fundamental shift in EC policies towards CSOs
3.3. The growing debate on channels of aid delivery
3.4. Looking at the civil society channel as a ‘living system’
4. ANSWERS TO THE EVALUATION QUESTIONS
4.1. EVALUATION QUESTION 1: To what extent and how has the EC defined the rationale for delivering aid through CSOs in different political, geographical and thematic contexts?
4.2. EVALUATION QUESTION 2: To what extent has the EC made clear choices at the programming level with regard to delivering aid through CSOs in country/regional strategy papers; in (post-) conflict situations/failed states/or difficult partnerships;as well as in sectoral and thematic priority areas of intervention?
4.3. EVALUATION QUESTION 3: To what extent and how has European Commission aid channeled through CSOs been consistent with stated policy objectives or programming choices regarding CSO roles (including service delivery in the context of poverty reduction strategies and advocacy work)?
4.4. EVALUATION QUESTION 4: To what extent and how has EC aid channeled through CSOs been consistent with stated policy objectives regarding actors to be supported as well as approaches and instruments to be used?
4.5. EVALUATION QUESTION 5: To what extent and how has European Commission aid delivered through CSOs been consistent with relevant new commitments related to the Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness, particularly with regard to capacity development of CSOs in the context of sector and budget support?
4.6. EVALUATION QUESTION 6: To what extent and how have European Commission strategies, programmes and projects, delivered through CSOs, contributed to achieving key EC/EU development objectives?
| 4.7. EVALUATION QUESTION 7: To what extent and how did European Commission strategies, programmes and projects, delivered through CSOs, provide an appropriate development response in (post-)conflict situations/fragile states/’difficult partnerships?
4.8. EVALUATION QUESTION 8: To what extent are the European Commission management systems (in terms of programming modalities; funding modalities and procedures; monitoring mechanisms) adapted to the needs of using CSOs as an aid delivery channel?
5. OVERALL ASSESSMENT, CONCLUSIONS AND LESSONS LEARNT
5.1. Overall assessment (all EQs combined)
5.2. Main conclusions
5.3. Key lessons learnt
6. RECOMMENDATIONS
6.1. OVERALL RECOMMENDATION
6.2. POLITICAL RECOMMENDATIONS
6.3. STRATEGIC AND OPERATIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS
6.4. PROCESS RECOMMENDATIONS
| VOLUME 2: ANNEXES
ANNEX I: ToRs
ANNEX II: Description of regional agreements
ANNEX III: Various regional impact diagrams
ANNEX IV: Description of budget lines
ANNEX V: CSP analysis
ANNEX VI: ROM analysis
ANNEX VII: Questionnaire analysis
ANNEX VIII: Mapping of financial flows
ANNEX IX: Minutes of Focus Groups
ANNEX X: Evaluation questions, judgement criteria and indicators
ANNEX XI: Background Information on EC objectives and the CSO channel
ANNEX XII: Detailed Recommendations
ANNEX XIII: Selected bibliography
ANNEX XIV: Consistency table: Findings Æ conclusions Æ recommendations
VOLUME 3: COUNTRY NOTES
Benin
Cambodia
Georgia
Lebanon
Peru
Somalia
Author (Corp. Body): PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | CIDEAL | Channel Research Ltd. | South Research
Year: 2008
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract Number: EVA/116-833 | Ref. 1259
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: Beninevaluationdevelopment aidEUEuropean CommissionGeorgiaCambodiaconflict situation
cooperationLebanonorganizationsPeruSomaliacivil society
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesPeruSomaliaBeninGeorgia
LebanonCambodia
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Better Migration Management Programme : Annual Progress Report ; 1st April 2016 to 31st March 2017
Abstract
The report covers the period 1st April 2016 – 31st March 2017. It focuses on accounting for the activities during this first year of Programme implementation. Overall, it can be summarised that good progress has been made towards the establishment of the Better Migration Management (BMM) Programme in the Horn of Africa (HoA). [Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
1 Context of the action
2 Results and activities
2.1 Component 1: Policy harmonisation and cooperation
2.2 Component 2: Capacity Building
2.3 Component 3: Protection
2.3 Component 4: Awareness Raising
3 Beneficiaries/affiliated entities and other Cooperation
3.1 Target beneficiaries
3.2 State authorities
3.3 Other third parties involved (including other donors, other government agencies or local government units, NGOs, etc.)
3.4 Links/ Synergies with other Actions/ Programmes
4 Deviations or adjustments against planned activities
5 Programme management and monitoring
5.1. Programme management
5.2 Programme monitoring and evaluation
5.3 Programme steering structure
6 Visibility
Author (Corp. Body): Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) GmbH / Stabsstelle Evaluierung
Contributer: Federal Ministry for Economic Cooperation and Development | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Internationale Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung
Year: 2017
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: T05 – EUTF – HoA – REG – 09/ 16.2126.7
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EgyptEthiopiaDjiboutidevelopment aidEritreaEUKenyacooperation
migration policySomaliaSudanTunisiaUganda
Subject: Aid programmesMigration
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesEgyptTunisiaEthiopiaDjiboutiEritrea
KenyaSomaliaSudanSouth SudanUganda
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
« Previous
Next »
Copyright (C) 2003-2019 European Documentation Centres / Update: 09.10.2019