Suche nach Schlagworten '00009351'
72 entries found on 4 pages. starting on record 41 ending on 60Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),
Title: Western Balkans and Turkey Media and Freedom of Expression Fact-finding and Scoping Study : Final report ; September 2012 April 2013 ; Framework Contract EuropeAid/127054/C/SER/Multi ; Lot 7: Governance and Home Affairs Disclaimer |
---|
Abstract This report provides four sets of recommendations with close to forty detailed action proposals aiming at improving institutional capacities in the Western Balkans and Turkey to ensure media freedom and freedom of expression. Almost one hundred and eighty journalists, media owners, members of media regulatory bodies, experts, public officials, diplomats and other key stakeholders were consulted during the field research for this report. Their opinions were essential for a realistic situation analysis and an assessment of practical options for a support strategy encompassing the whole region. [Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY INTRODUCTION COMPONENT I 1. Task description 2. Chief benchmark one: Election, composition and independence of the board and management of national regulatory authorities and public service broadcasters 2.1 Turkey 2.2 Serbia 2.3 Kosovo 2.4 Albania 2.5 Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia 2.6 Montenegro 2.7 Bosnia and Herzegovina 3. Benchmark one: conclusions and recommendations ... 4. Chief benchmark two: Funding of national broadcasting authorities and public service broadcasters ... 5. Chief benchmark two: Conclusions and recommendations ... 6. Chief benchmark three: Digitisation and public service broadcasting ... 7. Benchmark three: Conclusions and recommendations ... 8. Chief benchmark four: Informal power structures influencing regulatory authorities and public service broadcasters ... 9. Benchmark four: Conclusions and recommendations ... 10. Chief benchmark five: Investigative journalism and public service broadcasters ... 11. Benchmark five: Conclusions and recommendations ... COMPONENT II: SUSTAINABLE AND EFFECTIVE MECHANISMS FOR MEDIA SELF-REGULATION 1. Task description 2. Introduction 3. Mapping of support to ethical guidelines and media self-regulation 4. State of play of self-regulation in four in-depth studied parts of the region ... 5. Specific issues and requests in the region with regard to the support of media self-regulation 6. Recommendations COMPONENT III 1. Task description 2. Overview 3. Country summaries ... 4. Recommendations ... COMPONENT IV 1. Survey of existing award schemes for investigative journalism ... 2. Conclusions 3. Optional designs, key risks and mitigation measures for the implementation of an EU award scheme ANNEX 1 PUBLIC SERVICE BROADCASTERS IN THE REGION: OVERVIEW OF HUMAN RESOURCES AND BUDGETS ANNEX 2 LESSONS LEARNED FROM PREVIOUS ASSISTANCE EFFORTS 1. Technical support ... |
Author: Erichsen, Bjørn | Naseniece, Rita | Reljic?, Dus?an ; 120536676 |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission | PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt, Freiburg im Breisgau | ADE s.a. | Cardno Emerging Markets Ltd. | European Centre for Development Policy Management | EPRD Ltd | ERIS Ltd | |
Year: 2013 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Framework Contract EuropeAid/127054/C/SER/Multi | Letter of Contract N° 2012/288659/1 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: reportEUjoining of the European Unionmediafreedom of opinionSoutheastern EuropeTurkey |
Subject: European Community external relationsMedia |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesSoutheastern Europe, Balkan peninsula. General ResourcesTurkey |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Thematic evaluation of EU's support to civil society in the Western Balkans (namely Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Kosovo under UNSCR 1244, Montenegro and Serbia) and Turkey : Letter of Contract N°2010/254598 ; Draft Final Report 2 ; The European Unions IPA Programme for Western Balkans and Turkey |
---|
Table of Contents Abbreviations and acronyms Executive Summary INTRODUCTION FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS RECOMMENDATIONS 1. Introduction 1.1 Evaluation Purpose and Scope 1.2 Implementation and Methodology 2. Evaluation findings 2.1 CS Context in the WBT 2.2 Key Findings 3. Lessons Learned 4. Conclusions and Key Recommendations 4.1 Conclusions 4.2 Key Recommendations 5. ANNEXES 5.1 Annex I - Evaluation Matrix 5.2 Annex II - Summary of Phase 1 Findings 5.3 Annex III - Country Specific Findings 5.4 Annex IV - P2P Recapitulated Findings and Conclusions 5.5 Annex V - Survey of WBT CSO Regional Networks 5.6 Annex VI - Recapitulation of Comprehensive List of EU CS Support Projects 5.7 Annex VII - Overview of Recommendations Related to EU Support to the WBT CS 5.8 Annex VIII - List of People Met (Phase 2) |
Author: Crnjanski, Dragan | Theunisz, Petrus | Wilke, Marcus |
Contributer: IBF International Consulting | BAA |
Publisher: Europäische Kommission |
Year: 2012 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Letter of Contract N°2010/254598 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: development aidEUjoining of the European UnionSoutheastern EuropeTurkeycivil society |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIBEuropean Community external relations |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesAlbaniaBosnia and HerzegovinaKosovoMontenegro SerbiaCroatiaRepublic of MacedoniaTurkey |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Strategic/Interim evaluation of support for improvement in governance and management (SIGMA) programme : Evaluation Report ; FWC COM 2011 Lot 1: Studies and Technical Assistance in all sectors |
---|
Table of Contents ACRONYMS TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLES 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 2 BACKGROUND AND JUSTIFICATION OF THE EVALUATION MISSION 2.1 OBJECTIVE OF THE SIGMA SUPPORT DURING THE LAST THREE YEARS 2.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE EVALUATION MISSION 3 METHODOLOGY AND WORK PLAN OF THE EVALUATION MISSION 3.1 METHODOLOGY USED BY THE EVALUATORS 3.2 IMPLEMENTATION SCHEDULE 4 KEY FINDINGS 5 CONCLUSIONS 5.1 BENEFICIARIES OPINIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: SWOT 5.2 EVALUATORS OPINIONS AND CONCLUSIONS 6 ANNEXES 6.1 ANNEX 1 QUESTIONNAIRE N°1 TO BENEFICIARIES 6.2 ANNEX 2 QUESTIONNAIRE N°2 TO BENEFICIARIES 6.3 ANNEX 3 QUESTIONNAIRE TO EUDS AND EC 6.4 ANNEX 4 COST DIVERGENCES 6.5 ANNEX 5 NUMBER OF PARTICIPANTS TO CONFERENCE AND TO STUDY TOURS |
Author (Corp. Body): B&S; Europe | Proman |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission |
Year: 2012 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: EUROPEAID/129783/C/SER/multi | Request No 2011/276342 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: evaluationdevelopment aidEUjoining of the European UniongovernancemanagementSoutheastern EuropeTurkey |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relationsAdministrative procedures |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesSoutheastern Europe, Balkan peninsula. General ResourcesTurkey |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Thematic evaluation on judiciary and fundamental rights in Turkey : Letter of Contract N° 2011/277332 ; Final Report ; The European Unions IPA Programme for Turkey |
---|
Table of Contents ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 OBJECTIVES OF THE EVALUATION 1.2 SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION 1.3 METHODOLOGY 1.4 CONSTRAINTS AND LIMITATIONS 1.5 OVERVIEW OF THE REPORT 2. PRE-ACCESSION CONTEXT 2.1 HUMAN RIGHTS AND JUDICIARY IN PRE-ACCESSION TURKEY 2.2 EU ASSISTANCE TO TURKEY 2.3 EVALUATION PORTFOLIO 3. EVALUATION OF THE PORTFOLIO 3.1 RELEVANCE 3.2 EFFECTIVENESS 3.3 EFFICIENCY 3.4 SUSTAINABILITY 3.5 IMPACT 4. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 4.1 CONCLUSIONS 4.2 RECOMMENDATIONS ON PROGRAMMING 4.3 RECOMMENDATIONS ON PROJECT DESIGN AND MANAGEMENT ANNEX 1: TERMS OF REFERENCE ANNEX 2: LIST OF PEOPLE INTERVIEWED ANNEX 3: MAPPING OF JHR PORTFOLIO ANNEX 4: LIST OF ACCESSION PARTNERSHIPS PRIORITIES ANNEX 5: LIST OF ALL JHR-RELATED PROJECT, 2004-2011 |
Author: Robert, Pierre | Hansen, Abigail | Guillet, Sara |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung | IBF International Consulting |
Year: 2012 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Letter of Contract N° 2011/277332 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: Evaluationdevelopment aidEUjoining of the European Unionbasic rightjudiciaryprogramTurkey |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relationsLaw. Jurisprudence. Legal theoryHuman rights |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesTurkey |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: TAIEX and Twinning Activity Report 2012 |
---|
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung |
Year: 2013 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: development aidEUjoining of the European Unionneighborhood helpprogramSoutheastern EuropeTurkey |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesSoutheastern Europe, Balkan peninsula. General ResourcesTurkey |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Annual Work Programme for Grants 2012 |
---|
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung |
Year: 2011 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: EUjoining of the European UnionEuropean integrationpromotional programIcelandSoutheastern EuropeTurkeycivil society |
Subject: European Community funds and other financial instruments |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesIcelandSoutheastern Europe, Balkan peninsula. General ResourcesTurkey |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Mid-term Meta Evaluation of IPA Assistance Evaluation Report : Final version |
---|
Abstract This evaluation covers mainly Component I for which the EC has undertaken interim evaluations covering programming and implementation of IPA assistance as part of the specific regulatory requirement for evaluation and programming needs under this Component.For Components II to V, interim evaluations covering implementation of IPA assistance have not been completed by the time this meta-evaluation was undertaken. For Component II, the metaevaluation has used a recent evaluation on Governance Structures and procedures. For Components III, IV and V the meta-evaluation has used ex-ante evaluations. This has limited the analysis of these three components in the current report to the area of the intervention logic of programming.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents Glossary of Acronyms Executive Summary Main Report 1. Introduction 1.1. Objectives of the Meta Evaluation 1.2. Approach and Methodology 2. Evaluation, Assessment and Findings 2.1. Assessment of the IPA Intervention Logic (EQ Group 2) 2.1.1. Analysis of Objectives and Indicators 2.1.2. Programming and Needs Assessment 2.1.3. Analysis of Financial Resources 2.1.4. Project Selection 2.1.5. Sequencing and Prioritisation 2.1.6. Alignment with the Beneficiaries Strategies 2.1.7. Coordination with Key Donors 2.1.8. Weaknesses of the Current IPA Programming Framework 2.2. Overview and Mapping of Existing Strategies in and Financial Assistance to the IPA Beneficiaries (EQ Groups 1 + 3) 2.2.1. The Existing Strategies in the IPA Beneficiaries 2.2.2. The Process of Implementing the Strategies by the IPA Beneficiaries 2.2.3. The Alignment of EU and Donor Assistance with the Strategies 2.2.4. The Orientation of IPA Programme Support via a Sector Based Approach 2.2.5. The Programming of External Assistance via a Sector Based Approach 2.3. Judgement on the Performance of the IPA 2007-2009(Component I) Programmes (EQ Group 5) 2.3.1. Capacity of the Administrative, Organisational and Monitoring Structures 2.3.2. Relevance, Efficiency and Effectiveness of the on-going Programmes 2.3.3. The Prospects for Impact and Sustainability of the on-going Programmes 3. Conclusions (Lessons Learned) and Recommendations 3.1. The Programming Framework Improving its Strategic Focus(EQ Group 4) 3.2. On-going IPA (Component I) Assistance Improving its Performance (EQ Group 6) List of Annexes Annex 1: Generalised Sequence of Annual Programming Activities Annex 2: External Assistance to the IPA Beneficiaries, 2005-2009 Annex 3: List of the Contributory Evaluations Used in Completing the Meta Evaluation Annex 4: List of Other Documents and Materials Used in Completing the Meta Evaluation List of Tables List of figures |
Author (Corp. Body): HTSPE Limited |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission |
Year: 2011 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Project No. 2010/231987 | FWC Commission 2007 Lot No 4 | REQUEST FOR OFFER No 2010 / 231-987 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: evaluationdevelopment aidEUjoining of the European Unionfinancial assistancebasic rightlawreform Southeastern EuropeTurkeyadministrative procedurecivil society |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIBEuropean Community external relationsPublic law. Public administration. Parliament |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesSoutheastern Europe, Balkan peninsula. General ResourcesTurkey |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Evaluation Twinning versus Technical Assistance : Final report |
---|
Abstract The focus of the evaluation is on the comparison of the delivery instruments twinning (standard and light) and technical assistance under IPA 2007-2008, Phare 2005-2006, CARDS 2005-2006 and the Turkey pre-accession assistance instrument 2005-2006 in the candidate and potential candidates.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents List of Abbreviations Preface Executive summary 1 Introduction 1.1 Objectives of the Evaluation 1.2 Methodology ... 1.3 Brief description of the Evaluation Process 1.4 The scope 2 The selection process - Is the selection done appropriately? 2.1 Introduction 2.2 Is the selection of twinning and TA supported by adequate (cost-benefit) analysis? ... 2.3 Are beneficiaries properly situated to make an appropriate and independent selection? 2.4 Are assessments realistic and reflect actual implementation practice? 2.5 Are the non-tangible benefits of twinning adequately identified and assessed? 2.6 Share of twinning over the years and between (potential) candidates 2.7 How efficient is the selection process? ... 2.8 Conclusions 3 Does the selected instrument enable an effective and efficient project implementation and sustainability? 3.1 Introduction 3.2 Findings of the Cost-Benefit Assessment ... 3.3 In which areas are twinning and TA most effective as instrument? ... 3.4 To what extent do control mechanisms for twinning and TA contracts impact their efficiency and effectiveness? 3.5 Which are the factors having an impact on effectiveness and sustainability of assistance? 3.6 Are there examples of projects combining TA and twinning? 3.7 Are different beneficiaries using different instruments to achieve the same objective? Which lessons can be learned? ... 3.8 Conclusions ... 4 How can the selection process be improved? 4.1 Main conclusions 4.2 Recommendations ... Annex 1 Terms of Reference Annex 2 The Evaluation Framework Annex 3 Results of the mapping exercise Annex 4 Blueprint for Selection of Instrument Annex 5 List of Literature and Documents consulted |
Author: Nugteren, Mart | Willemsen, Anja | Burisch, Michael ; 170464148 |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung | ECORYS NEI, Rotterdam |
Year: 2011 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: KK/MN FP97822 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: evaluationpromotion of developmentEUjoining of the European Unionfinancial assistanceneighborhood helpSoutheastern Europetechnical assistance Turkey |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesSoutheastern Europe, Balkan peninsula. General ResourcesTurkey |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Review of Twinning in Turkey : Annexes to the final report ; In the context of the framework contract on Evaluation and Evaluation-Related Services no. BUDG N°06/PO/01/003/101911 |
---|
Table of Contents Annex 1 Overview of Twinning in Turkey 1.1 The Twinning instrument 1.2 The key actors involved in Twinning projects 1.3 Turkeys steps towards EU accession 1.4 Twinning in Turkey Annex 2 Detailed analysis of Interim Evaluation Reports 2.1 Overall assessment 2.2 Performance ratings per project 2.3 Analysis per criterion and sector 2.4 List of Interim Evaluation Reports Annex 3 Interview Reports Annex 4 Sector reports 2.1 Justice and home affairs 2.2 Environment 2.3 Energy 2.4 Transport 2.5 Finance 2.6 Agriculture and Fisheries 2.7 Internal market Annex 5 Case studies of successful Twinnings 5.1 Overview 5.2 TR0404.04 Development of a training system for border police 5.3TR 0601.01 Support to the set up of an Asylum and Country of Originsystem 5.4 TR0603.05 Strengthening the capacity of the Turkish Grand NationalAssembly 5.5 TR0603.04 Water sector capacity building 5.6 TR0603.03 Improvement of the conditions for Cross Border Electricity Trade 5.7 TR0302.05 Strengthening the audit capacity of the Turkish Court of Accounts 5.8 TR0503.05 Establishment of an IPA Rural Development Agency 5.8 TR0403.01 Customs Modernization Project II Annex 6 Case studies of less successful Twinnings 6.1 Overview 6.2 TR0501.05 An independent police complaints commission 6.3 TR0601.03 Training of gendarmerie office on European rights standards 6.4 TR0404.03 Enhancement of professionalism of the Turkish Gendarmerie 6.5 TR0403.08 Assistance to the Turkish road transport sector 6.6 TR0202.01 Institutional strengthening of the Energy Market Regulatory Authority 6.7 TR0403.02 Tax administration capacity building 6.8 TR0403.03 Restructuring and strengthening of the food safety and control system 6.9 TR0503.01 Reinforcement of the institutional capacity for establishing a product safety system Annex 7 Round table meetings Annex 8 Analysis of success and fail factors |
Author: Pot, Ferdinand ; 1055740252 | Blomeyer, Roland | Geveci, Sevil |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung | ECORYS NEI, Rotterdam |
Year: 2011 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: BUDG N°06/PO/01/003/101911 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: domestic marketenergyEUjoining of the European Unioncase studyfinancefisherydomestic policy judiciaryagricultureneighborhood helptransportationTurkeyenvironment |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesTurkey |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Review of Twinning in Turkey : Final report ; In the context of the framework contract on Evaluation and Evaluation-Related Services no. BUDG N°06/PO/01/003/101911 |
---|
Abstract ECORYS has been contracted through the framework contract on Evaluation and Evaluation-related services (BUDG N°06/PO/01/Lot N°3) of DG Budget of the European Commission to prepare a thematic evaluation on the assistance provided by the EC to Turkey through the Twinning instrument.The object of this evaluation report is the Twinning instrument as it has been applied in Turkey in the period 2002 - 2009. In this period, 92 Twinning projects in Turkey were initiated and financed under the Pre-accession assistance and IPA programmes by the European Commission.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents List of Abbreviations Executive Summary 1 Background of the Evaluation 1.1 Object of the Evaluation 1.2 Objective of the Evaluation ... 1.3 Methodological Framework ... 1.4 Structure of the Report 2 Relevance 2.1 General notes 2.2 Has the underlying strategic rationale and design of Twinning assistance been appropriate for Turkey, at programme/sectoral levels? 2.3 Has Twinning been used in the circumstances foreseen in the Commissions Twinning Manual? 2.4 Are there certain sectors or Accession Partnership fields in Turkey where Twinning could be an adequate tool but is not used? 2.5 Can synergies be identified between Twinning and other types of EC projects, and/or with projects funded by other donors? 2.6 Is the needs assessment relevant, i.e. are mandatory results precisely defined in the Project Fiches 2.7 Is the interaction between key stakeholders (beneficiary institutions, ECD, DG ELARG) adequate and performing efficiently to ensure successful programming of Twinning? 3 Efficiency 3.1 General notes 3.2 Are inputs/activities being efficiently transferred into the planned outputs? 3.3 Is the selection of twinning (as opposed to any other instrument, i.e.Technical Assistance or Direct Agreements) adequately assessed and justified? 6 Review of Twinning in Turkey: Final Report3.4 Could the same results and impacts be achieved more cost-effectively? 4 Effectiveness 4.1 General notes 4.2 Has the Twinning support under evaluation achieved (or will likely to achieve in the case of ongoing support) the objectives pursued? 4.3 Are quality and quantity of resources allocated by both beneficiary and the Member State/Twinning partner appropriate? 4.4 Is the interaction between key stakeholders adequate and performing effectively to ensure successful implementation of Twinning? 5 Impact 5.1 General notes ... 6. Sustainablity ... 7 Horizontal evaluation questions ... |
Author: Pot, Ferdinand ; 1055740252 | Blomeyer, Roland | Geveci, Sevil |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung | ECORYS NEI, Rotterdam |
Year: 2011 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: BUDG N°06/PO/01/003/101911 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: domestic marketenergyEUjoining of the European Unioncase studyfinancefisherydomestic policy judiciaryagricultureneighborhood helptransportationTurkeyenvironment |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesTurkey |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Annual Work Programme for Grants 2011 |
---|
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung |
Year: 2011 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: EUjoining of the European UnionEuropean integrationpromotional programIcelandSoutheastern EuropeTurkeycivil society |
Subject: European Community funds and other financial instruments |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesIcelandSoutheastern Europe, Balkan peninsula. General ResourcesTurkey |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Instrument for Pre-Accession Assistance (IPA) : Multi-Annual Indicative Planning Document (MIPD) 2011-2013 Multi-Beneficiary ; Annex |
---|
Table of Contents 1. IPA Strategic objective 2. Strategic planning of IPA assistance 2.1. Challenges of the region and needs assessment 2.2. Regional strategies 2.3. Relations with the EU 2.4. Lessons learned 2.5. Consultations with stakeholders and donors 2.6. Selected priorities for EU assistance 3. Main sectors for EU support for 2011 2013 3.1. Justice and Home Affairs, including fundamental rights and vulnerable groups 3.2. Public Administration Reform 3.3. Civil Society 3.4. Private Sector Development 3.5. Transport and Energy Infrastructure, including nuclear safety 3.6. Environment and Climate Change 3.7. Social Development |
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission |
Year: 2011 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: development aidEUjoining of the European UnionIcelandSoutheastern EuropeTurkey |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesIcelandSoutheastern Europe, Balkan peninsula. General ResourcesTurkey |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Annex : National Programme for Turkey under the IPA - Transition Assistance and Institution Building component for the year 2011 ; Part 1 |
---|
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission |
Year: 2011 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Programme und Statuten |
Keyword: EUjoining of the European UnionassistanceinstitutionTurkey |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesTurkey |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Annex : National Programme for Turkey under the IPA-Transition Assistance and Institution Building component for the year 2010 |
---|
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission |
Year: 2010 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Programme und Statuten |
Keyword: EUjoining of the European UnionassistanceinstitutionTurkey |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesTurkey |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Screening report Turkey : Chapter 10 Information Society and Media |
---|
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung |
Year: 2007 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: EU expansioninformation societycontrolmediaTurkey |
Subject: European Community external relations and associated countriesCommunication media |
Countries Scheme: Turkey |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Screening report Turkey : Chapter 22 Regional policy and coordination of structural instruments |
---|
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Erweiterung |
Year: 2007 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: MD 154/07 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: EU expansioncontrolcoordinationregional policystructural developmentTurkey |
Subject: European Community external relations and associated countries |
Countries Scheme: Turkey |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Country report Non-discrimination : Turkey 2015 ; Including summaries in English, French and German |
---|
Table of Contents EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RÉSUMÉ ZUSAMMENFASSUNG INTRODUCTION 1 GENERAL LEGAL FRAMEWORK 2 THE DEFINITION OF DISCRIMINATION ... 3 PERSONAL AND MATERIAL SCOPE ... 4 EXCEPTIONS ... 5 POSITIVE ACTION (Article 5 Directive 2000/43, Article 7 Directive 2000/78) ... 6 REMEDIES AND ENFORCEMENT ... 7 BODIES FOR THE PROMOTION OF EQUAL TREATMENT (Article 13 Directive 2000/43) 8 IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES ... 9 COORDINATION AT NATIONAL LEVEL 10 CURRENT BEST PRACTICES 11 SENSITIVE OR CONTROVERSIAL ISSUES 12 LATEST DEVELOPMENTS ANNEX 1: TABLE OF KEY NATIONAL ANTI-DISCRIMINATION LEGISLATION ANNEX 2: TABLE OF INTERNATIONAL INSTRUMENTS |
Author: Kurban, Dilek ; 1030161070 |
Contributer: European Network of Legal Experts in Gender Equality and Non Discrimination, Utrecht | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Verbraucher |
Publisher: Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen, Luxemburg |
Year: 2015 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978-92-79-53390-7 | DS-02-15-952-3A-N |
Language: en | de | fr |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: old personequal rights lawlaborhandicapemploymentequal opportunitydiscriminationethnic origin EUhomosexualityIslamminorityMuslimracelegal usagereligious communitysexualityTurkey |
Subject: European Community law in generalEqual opportunitiesRacial policyReligionsEmployment and unemployment |
Countries Scheme: Turkey |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Developing Anti-Discrimination Law in Europe : The 28 EU Member States, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Iceland, Liechtenstein, Norway and Turkey compared |
---|
Abstract Over 10 years ago a major and unprecedented evolution occurred in the European Union with the adoption in 2000 of two pieces of EU legislation in the field of anti-discrimination: the Racial Equality Directive (2000/43/EC) and the Employment Equality Directive (2000/78/EC). The transposition and implementation of these legal provisions into the national legal systems of the 28 Member States is described in a series of annually updated country reports produced by the European Network of Legal Experts in the Non-discrimination Field. In addition, the Network also includes candidate countries (the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, Iceland and Turkey) and, since 2012, EEA countries (Liechtenstein and Norway).2 The Network annually reports on their national legislation compared with the anti-discrimination standards set by the EU. This Network was established and is managed by the Human European Consultancy and the Migration Policy Group. The national reports are written by independent national experts in each country covered by the Network. The information is provided in response to questions set out in a template format which closely follows the provisions of the two Directives, although all countries included in the Network do not have the same compliance obligations. The 33 reports cover national law, the establishment of enforcement mechanisms, jurisprudence and the adoption of other measures. They contain information current as of 1 January 2013.3 As such, they are a valuable source of information on national anti-discrimination law and can be found on the Networks website at: www.non-discrimination.net. [Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents Preface Introduction 1 Protected grounds of discrimination A. Which grounds are covered? Table: Protected grounds B. Racial or ethnic origin C. Religion or belief Specific provisions ... ethos-based organisations D. Disability Specific provisions ... the reasonable accommodation duty Table: ... Specific provisions on disability health and safety E. Sexual orientation F. Age Specific provisions on age G. Assumed and associated discrimination H. Multiple discrimination 2 Definitions and scope A. Direct discrimination ... B. Indirect discrimination ... C. Harassment ... D. Instructions to discriminate ... E. Personal scope F. Material scope ... Employment Social protection Social advantages Education Access to and supply of goods and services Beyond the Directives 3 Exceptions to the principle of equal treatment and positive action A. Genuine and determining occupational requirements B. Armed forces and other specific occupations C. Nationality ... D. Family benefits E. Public security, public order, criminal offences, protection of health, and protection of the rights and freedoms of others F. Other exceptions G. Positive action ... 4 Access to justice and effective enforcement A. Judicial and administrative procedures Legal action in the private sector Legal action in the public sector Obstacles to effective access to justice B. Legal standing and associations Entities that may engage in procedures ... To engage on behalf of Collective redress Legitimate interest C. Burden of proof D. Victimisation ... E. Sanctions and remedies 5 The role of equality bodies compared ... 6 Implementation and compliance A. Dissemination of information and social and civil dialogue Dissemination of information and awareness raising Social and civil dialogue B. Ensuring compliance Conclusion ANNEX 1 ... ... |
Author: Chopin, Isabelle ; 1026392233 | Germaine-Sahl, Catharina ; 1053777302 |
Contributer: Human European Consultancy, Utrecht | Migration Policy Group | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz | Europäisches Netz unabhängiger Sachverständiger im Bereich der Nichtdiskriminierung |
Publisher: Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen, Luxemburg |
Year: 2013 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978-92-79-36348-1 | DS-AW-14-001-EN-N |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: equal rights lawhandicapemployment policydiscriminationEUhealth policyIcelandLiechtenstein MacedoniaNorwayraceracial policylegal usagereligionsocial policyTurkey |
Subject: European Community law in generalSocial policy. Social welfareEqual opportunitiesRacial policySick and handicapped |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesIcelandNorway Republic of MacedoniaLiechtensteinTurkey |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: Evaluation of Commissions cooperation with the Council of Europe : An assessment focussed on EU funding of Joint Programmes ; Final Report ; Volume I |
---|
Title (other): Evaluation of Commissions cooperation with the Council of Europe : An assessment focussed on EU funding of Joint Programmes ; Final Report ; Volume II | Evaluation of Commissions cooperation with the Council of Europe : An assessment focussed on EU funding of Joint Programmes ; Final Report ; Volume III | Evaluation of Commissions cooperation with the Council of Europe : An assessment focussed on EU funding of Joint Programmes ; Final Report ; Volume IV | Evaluation of the Commissions cooperation with the Council of Europe : Fiche Contradictoire ; Ref. Ares(2013)3372167 | Evaluation of the Commissions cooperation with the Council of Europe : Final Report | Evaluation of the Commission cooperation with the Council of Europe (2000-2010) : (focused on the joint programmes) ; ref. 1311 ; EVINFO | Evaluation of Commissions cooperation with the Council of Europe : Executive Summary |
Abstract This Final Report presents the outcome of the Evaluation of Commissions cooperation with the Council of Europe (CoE). It was commissioned by the DG DEVCO Evaluation Unit and was implemented between December 2010 and July 2012. The evaluation provides an independent assessment of the European Commissions (ECs) past and current cooperation with the CoE by looking at how relevant, efficient, effective and visible this cooperation has been in supporting sustainable impact for the protection, promotion and dissemination of European values on the European continent and beyond. The evaluation identifies relevant key lessons learned from the EC-CoE cooperation, in order to provide recommendations for the future of the EC-CoE cooperation.The evaluation covers the period from 2000 to 2010. All regions where the EC cooperation with partner countries is implemented through the CoE were included in the scope of this evaluation. The main thematic focus of the evaluation was the EC channelling of aid through the CoE in the form of Joint Programmes (JPs); however, the broader strategic aspects of the relationship between the two institutions were taken into account as well.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents Executive Summary 1 Introduction 1.1 Objective and scope of the evaluation 1.2 Structure of the report 2 Methodology 2.1 Stages of the evaluation process 2.2 Challenges and limitations 3 Background and context 3.1 An overview: History of cooperation between the CoE and the EC 3.2 EC-CoE Joint programmes 4 Intervention logic of the EC-CoE cooperation 5 Inventory 5.1 Introduction 5.2 Findings 6 Answers to the Evaluation Questions 6.1 EQ1: To what extent have the criteria for decisions to cooperate with the CoE been clear, transparent and strategically sound? 6.2 EQ2: To what extent has the cooperation with the CoE, in particular via the channelling of funds, enabled the EC to use the CoEs specific sectoral expertise and mandate and geographical scope in the key areas of cooperation? 6.3 EQ3: To what extent has the cooperation with the CoE, in particular via the channelling of funds, contributed to increasing respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms? 6.4 EQ4: To what extent has cooperation with the CoE, in particular via the channelling of funds, contributed to strengthening the rule of law as it relates to the fight against corruption, money laundering, organised crime and trafficking? 6.5 EQ5: To what extent has the cooperation with the CoE, in particular via the channelling of funds, contributed to strengthening the rule of law as it relates to legal systems and access to justice? 6.6 EQ6: To what extent has the cooperation with the CoE, in particular via the channelling of funds, contributed to establishing stronger democratic institutions and practices at central and local level? 6.7 EQ7: To what extent have the implementation modalities of Joint Programmes employed by the CoE been appropriate to help achieving EC objectives related to human rights, rule of law, and democracy? | 6.8 EQ8: To what extent has the cooperation with the CoE, in particular via the channelling of funds, helped to enhance complementarity and synergies between the EC and the CoE? 6.9 Overall assessment of the EC-CoE cooperation 7 Conclusions and recommendations 7.1 Conclusions 7.2 Recommendations List of tables List of figures List of acronyms VOLUME II: DETAILED INFORMATION MATRIX 1. EQ1: Guidance criteria 2. EQ2: Specific expertise 3. EQ3: Impacts in Human rights 4. EQ4: Impacts in Rule of Law I 5. EQ5: Impacts in Rule of Law II 6. EQ6: Impacts in Democracy 7. EQ7: Implementation 8. EQ8: Complementarity and Synergies VOLUME III: FIELD VISIT COUNTRY NOTES 1. Armenia 2. Moldova 3. Serbia 4. Turkey VOLUME IV: ANNEXES Annex 1: Final evaluation matrix Annex 2: Synthesis of evaluation reports Annex 3: Results of survey to EU Delegations Annex 4: Inventory Annex 5: List of EC-CoE contracts Annex 6: Thematic case studies Annex 7: List of people consulted Annex 8: Key sources consulted Annex 9: Terms of Reference |
Author: MacKellar, Forrest Landis ; 17055242X | Devine, Vera | Twomey, Patrick |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt, Freiburg im Breisgau | ADE | DRN | Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, Berlin |
Year: 2012 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: EuropeAid/122888/C/SER/Multi | Ref. Ares(2013)3372167 | Ref. 1311 |
Language: en |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: Armeniaevaluationconception of democracydevelopment aidEUEuropean CommissionCouncil of Europecooperation human rightsprogramconstitutional stateSerbiaTurkey |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relationsHuman rights |
Countries Scheme: Global ResourcesEurope. General ResourcesMoldovaSerbiaArmenia Turkey |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |
Title: External Evaluation of the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA II) (2014 mid 2017) : Final Report ; Volume 1: Main report |
---|
Title (other): External Evaluation of the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA II) (2014 mid 2017) : Final Report ; Volume 2: Annexes | External Evaluation of the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA II) : Short summary |
Abstract The evaluation of the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance (IPA II), together with the other independent evaluations of each External Financing Instrument (EFI), that of the Common Implementing Regulation (CIR) and the Coherence Report, will be one of the sources of information to feed into the Mid-Term Review Report (MTR) of the EFIs. The MTR is required by the Common Implementing Regulation (CIR) Article 17, by the end of December 2017. The evaluation assesses whether the Instrument for Pre-accession Assistance(IPAII)is fit for purpose to deliver EU resources towards EU's external policy, both at start of the planning period (2014) and currently, and will consider the place IPA II its complementarities and synergies within the wider set of external financing instruments. The main aim of the evaluation is to provide a comprehensive answer to the question whether IPA II is delivering against its main objective of preparing candidate countries and potential candidates for EU membership and thus if it is fit for purpose.[Author vide copyright] |
Table of Contents Executive summary Résumé 1 Introduction 2 Methodology 2.1 Key methodological elements 2.2 The intervention logic 2.3 Challenges 3 Responses to the evaluation questions 3.1 EQ 1 on relevance 3.2 EQ 2 on effectiveness, impact, sustainability 3.3 EQ 3 on efficiency 3.4 EQ 4 on added value 3.5 EQ 5 on coherence, consistency, complementarity and synergies 3.6 EQ 6 on leverage 4 Conclusions 4.1 Cluster 1: Relevance of IPA II and its approach 4.2 Cluster 2: Effectiveness and Value Added 4.3 Cluster 3: Efficiency and Implementation Issues 4.4 Cluster 4: Coherence, Complementarities,Synergies and Leverage 4.5 Cluster 5: Issues Specific to Turkey 5 Recommendations 5.1 Cluster 1: Relevance of IPA II and appropriateness of its approach 5.2 Cluster 2: Effectiveness and value added 5.3 Cluster 3: Efficiency & Implementation issues 5.4 Cluster 4: Coherence, complementarities, synergies and leverage 5.5 Cluster 5: Issues specific for Turkey List of boxes Box 1 The evaluand List of figures Figure 1 Main features of IPA II compared to IPA I Figure 2 Refined intervention logic of IPA II List of tables Table 1 IPA II national indicative sector allocations based on ISPs (2014-2020) Table 2 Overview of the main conclusions Table 3 Overview of the main recommendation | Volume 2 1 Annex 1: Evaluation matrix 1.1 EQ 1 on relevance 1.2 EQ 2 on effectiveness, impact, sustainability 1.3 EQ 3 on efficiency 1.4 EQ 4 on added value 1.5 EQ 5 on coherence, consistency, complementarity and synergies 1.6 EQ 6 on leverage 2 Annex 2: Further details on the methodology 3 Annex 3: IPA response to changes in context 4 Annex 4: Case studies 5 Annex 5: Consultation strategy 6 Annex 6: Summary of OPC contributions 7 Annex 7: CIR note for IPA II 8 Annex 8: List of people interviewed 9 Annex 9: List of documents consulted List of boxes List of figures List of tables |
Author (Corp. Body): PARTICIP GmbH |
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Directorate General for Neighbourhood and Enlargement Negotiations | Ecorys | European Centre for Development Policy Management | Fiscus | itad | OPM |
Year: 2017 |
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: FWC COM 2015 | EuropeAid/137211/DH/SER/Multi | Specific Contract No ° 2016/374701 |
Language: en | fr |
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien |
Keyword: evaluationEUjoining of the European Unionfinancial assistanceassistanceTurkey |
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIBEuropean Community external relations |
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesTurkey |
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar! |
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/) |