Suche nach Schlagworten '00194484'

105 entries found on 6 pages. starting on record 1 ending on 20

Sort by: Title, Year, Author (Corp. Body),

1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
« Previous
Next »
Title: European Commission's support to the Republic of Moldova : country level evaluation ; Final synthesis report
Title (other): EVInfo; Observations ...; Fiche contradictoire | Evaluation of the European Commission’s Support to the Republic of
Moldova : Ref. 1094 , EVINFO | Fiche Contratictoire : Evaluation of the European Commission's support to the Republic of
Moldova | Evaluation of the European Commission's support to the Republic of Moldova : Observations and Judgement on the
final evaluation report | Fiche Contradictoire : Evaluation of the European Commission's support to the Republic of
Moldova : Follow-up (one year later)
Abstract
The purpose of this evaluation is to provide policy-makers and managers of the Commission’s relevant external co-operation Services as well as other relevant DGs (such as DG Trade and DG Environment), and the EC Delegations in Chisinau and Kiev, with an independent assessment of the EC programme of co-operation with Moldova. The quality of EC assistance is assessed on the basis of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Development Assistance Committee (DAC) criteria of relevance, effectiveness, impact, efficiency, and sustainability. The "3Cs" of coordination, complementarity, and coherence are also covered. The period covered by the evaluation is 2000-2006. However, as it is intended to be a forward-looking document, the team did not abruptly truncate the analysis at the end of 2006.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1.1. Purpose of the evaluation
1.2. Analysis and main findings
1.3. Overall Conclusions
1.4. Overall recommendations
2. FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ANSWERS TO EVALUATION QUESTIONS
2.1. Overview of Evaluation Questions
2.2. EQ (J) Justice and Home Affairs
2.3. EQ (N) - NGOs and Civil Society
2.4. EQ (S) - SMEs and Rural Development
2.5. EQ (E) - Trade and Economy
2.6. EQ(F) – FSP
2.7. EQ (H) - Health
2.8. EQ(X) – Environment
2.9. EQ (T)-Transnistria
2.10. EQ (R) –Relevance and Coherence
2.11. EQ(C) – Coordination and Complementarity
3. SECTOR-SPECIFIC RECOMMENDATIONS
3.1. EQ (J) - Justice and Home Affairs
3.2. EQ (N) – NGOs and Civil Society
3.3. EQ(S) - SMEs and rural development
3.4. EQ (E) – Trade and economic links
3.5. EQ (F) – Food Security Programme (FSP)
3.6. EQ(H) – Health
3.7. EQ(X) – Environment
3.8. EQ (T) – Transnistria
3.9. EQ (R) – Relevance and Coherence
3.10. EQ (C) – Coordination and Complementarity
OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF THE EC CO-OPERATION STRATEGY, CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
3.11. Global Evaluation of the EC strategy
3.12. Conclusions
3.13. Overall Recommendations
Author (Corp. Body): EGEval II EEIG
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen | PARTICIP GmbH
Year: 2007
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Ref. 1094
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EU countriesDevelopment AidHuman resourcesMoldovadevelopment aiddevelopment aid policyEUEuropean Commission
health care delivery systemcommercejudiciarycooperationrural developmentsustainabilityfoodenvironmental policyeconomic cooperationcivil society
Subject: Bilateral and multilateral aidEuropean Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesMoldova
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu./)
Title: Evaluation of EC support to partner countries in the area of energy : Final report
Title (other): Evaluation of EC support to partner countries in the area of energy : Final report ; Annexes | Evaluation of EC support
to partner countries in the area of energy : Executive Summary | Fiche contradictoire : Evaluation of the EC support to
Partner Countries in the area of Energy ; 3d column | Quality Grid : Evaluation of EC support to Partner Countries in
the area of Energy ; Final Report | Thematic evaluation of EC support to Partner Countries in the area of energy : Ref.
1192 ; EVINFO
Abstract
This evaluation assesses the relevance, efficiency, effectiveness, impact and sustainability of the European Commission’s support to its partner countries in the energy sector. It covers interventions designed or implemented during the 1996-2007 period in all the external cooperation partner countries. This scope of the evaluation is extremely broad and heterogeneous for three major reasons.First, the European Commission’s communications analysis shows that the Commission’s interventions in the energy sector have aimed to contribute to three very different goals: - Improving access to energy in developing countries as a means of reducing poverty; - Securing energy supplies to the EU; - Improving nuclear safety in the Former Soviet Union (FSU).The first goal is increasingly perceived as an important dimension of the fight against poverty; the two others address vital stakes for European citizens. Ranking these different goals by order of importance has no real meaning. The order in which they are presented in the report has no specific significance and has deliberately been varied...[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. THE EVALUATION
1.1 MANDATE AND SCOPE
1.2 APPROACH
1.3 LIMITS OF THE EVALUATION
2. THE COMMISSION SUPPORT FOR ENERGY
2.1 THE EC STRATEGY
2.2 THE COMMISSION’S INTERVENTION PORTFOLIO IN ENERGY
3. ANSWERS TO EVALUATION QUESTIONS
3.1 RELEVANCE AND INTERNAL CONSISTENCY
3.2 EFFECTIVENESS & SUSTAINABILITY
3.3 IMPACT
3.4 EFFICIENCY
3.5 CO-ORDINATION & COMPLEMENTARITY
3.6 COHERENCE
4. CONCLUSIONS
4.1 OVERALL ASSESSMENT OF THE EC STRATEGY: A CO-OPERATION CYCLE NOT YET FORMALISED, WITH IMPORTANT CONSEQUENCES
4.2. CONCLUSIONS ALONG THE 10 STAGE OF THE CO-OPERATION CYCLE
4.3 EFFECTIVENESS AND SUSTAINABILITY: POSITIVE CONTRIBUTION TO IMPROVED SAFETY OF SEVERALL NPPS, LIMITED EFFECTS ON EU SECURITY OF SUPPLY AND ON POVERTY REDUCTION
4.4 COMMUNITY VALUE ADDED
5. RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 THE SPECIFICS OF THE ENERGY SECTOR
5.2 TWO MAJOR AREAS OF PROGRESS
5.3 ADAPTING THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION’S APPROACH
5.4 IMPROVING KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT TO ENHANCE THE COMMISSION’S LEADERSHIP
5.5 SETTING UP A KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
5.6 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SUMMARISED
ANNEXES
ANNEX 1– TERMS OF REFERENCE
ANNEX 2– INTERVENTION LOGICS
ANNEX 3– STRUCTURE OF EVALUATION QUESTIONS, JUDGMENT CRITERIA AND INDICATORS
ANNEX 4– CASE STUDIES:SELECTION PROCESS AND FIGURES
ANNEX 5– THE COMMISSION’S INTERVENTIONS IN THE ENERGY SECTOR –FIGURES
ANNEX 6– THE ENERGY SECTOR: ISSUES AT STAKE AND MAIN ACTORS
ANNEX 7– THE GREEN PAPERS & THE THREE DIMENSIONS OF THE EC ENERGY DIALOGUE
ANNEX 8– FIELD VISIT NOTES
ANNEX 9– LIST OF INTERVIEWS
ANNEX 10– BIBLIOGRAPHY
Author (Corp. Body): Aide a? la De?cision Economique
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen | Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid
Year: 2008
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EU countriesEnergyDevelopment Aidpovertyevaluationenergy policyenergy supplydevelopment aid
EUEuropean Commissionnuclear power plantcooperationsecurity
Subject: Economic aid and technical assistanceEuropean Community external relationsEnergy policy. Power generation
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of Commission's external cooperation with partner countries through the organisations of the UN family :
final report ; Volume 1
Title (other): Evaluation of Commission’s external cooperation with partner countries through the organisations of the UN family :
Final Report ; Volume IIa – Annexes 1 to 9 | Evaluation of Commission’s external cooperation with partner countries
through the organisations of the UN family : Final Report ; Volume IIb – Annexes 10 to 12 on Evaluation Methodology |
Evaluation of Commission’s external cooperation with partner countries through the organisations of the UN family :
Inventory Note (final) | Fiche contradictoire : Evaluation of the Commission’s External Cooperation with partner
countries through the organisations of the UN family | Evaluation of Commission's external cooperation with partner
countries through the organisations of the UN family | Evaluation of Commission's External Cooperation with partner
countries through the organisations of the UN family : Ref. 1252 ; EVINFO
Abstract
This evaluation commissioned by the European Commission aims at providing an overall independent assessment of its external cooperation with partner countries through the organisations of the UN family. It covers the partnership between the Commission and the UN to the extent of the Commission’s funding of UN interventions. It focuses on development cooperation funds managed by DG RELEX, DEV and AIDCO. The period covered is 1999-2006.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. EVALUATION OBJECTIVES, ORGANISATION AND METHODOLOGY
1.1 EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE
1.2 EVLUATION METHODOLOGY
2. EVALUATION CONTEXT
2.1 HISTORICAL EVOLUTION OF THE COMMISSION-UN PARTNERSHIP
2.2 THE EVOLUTION OF THE LEGAL FRAMEWORK
2.3 INVENTORY OF FUNDS CHANNELLED
3. ANSWERS TO EVALUATION QUESTIONS
3.1 EVALUATION QUESTION 1 ON GUIDING CRITERIA
3.2 EVALUATION QUESTION 2 ON SPECIFIC EXPERTISE
3.3 EVALUATION QUESTION 3 ON RESULTS AND IMPACT
3.4 EVALUATION QUESTION 4 ON STRENGTHENING THE UN SYSTEM
3.5 EVALUATION QUESTION 5 ON SCALING UP
3.6 EVALUATION QUESTION 6 ON VISIBILITY
3.7 EVALUATION QUESTION 7 ON IMPLEMENTATION &COST REDUCTION
3.8 EVALUATION QUESTION 8 ON LEGAL FRAMEWORK
3.9 EVALUATION QUESTION 9 ON COORDINATION AND COMPLEMENTARITY
4. CONCLUSIONS
4.1 OVERALL ASSESSMENT
4.2 GENERAL CHANNELLING FRAMEWORK
4.3 ADDED VALUE OF CHANNELLING FOR THE COMMISSION, FOR THE UN, FOR PARTNER COUNTRIES,AND AS CONVEYED BY THE COMMISSION
4.4 RESULTS & IMPACT
4.5 EFFICIENCY OF THE AID DELIVERY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK
4.6 VISIBILITY
4.7 ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE
5. RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 GENERAL CHANNELLING FRAMEWORK
5.2 EFFICIENCY OF AID DELIVERY AND ADMINISTRATIVE FRAMEWORK
5.3 VISIBILITY
5.4 ORGANISATIONAL STRUCTURE
| Volume IIa Annexes 1 to 9
ANNEX 1- TERMS OF REFERENCE
ANNEX 2- THE EVALUATION QUESTIONS, JUDGEMENT CRITERIA, INDICATORS AND SOURCES OF INFORMATION
ANNEX 3– LIST OF THE SELECTED INTERVENTIONS
ANNEX 4– DESCRIPTION FICHES OF THE SELECTED INTERVENTIONS
ANNEX 5 – DATA COLLECTION GRIDS FOR EACH OF THE SELECTED INTERVENTIONS
ANNEX 6– FIELD MISSIONS DEBRIEFING PRESENTATIONS
ANNEX 7– SYNOPSIS OF ROM ANALYSIS
ANNEX 8– LIST OF PERSONS MET
ANNEX 9– BIBLIOGRAPHY
Volume IIb Annexes 10 to 12 on Evaluation Methodology
ANNEX 10–EVALUATION METHODOLOGICAL APPROACH
ANNEX 11–EVALUATION TOOLS AND CHECKLIST
ANNEX 12–PYRAMIDAL FOCUS GROUPS AND WORKING GROUPS
Author (Corp. Body): Aide a? la De?cision Economique
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid
Year: 2008
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EU countriesInternational cooperationevaluationdevelopment aidEUEuropean Commissionfinancial assistanceinternational cooperation
cooperationUNO
Subject: International cooperationEuropean Community funds and other financial instruments
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of the European Commission's support to the Republic of Guyana : final report ; Volume I – Main Report
Title (other): Evaluation of the European Commission's support to the Republic of Guyana : final report ; Volume II – Annexes | Fiche
contradictoire : Evaluation of the European Commission's support to the Republic of Guyana | Evaluation of the EC
support to the Republic of Guyana : Final Report | Evaluation of the European Commission’s support to the republic of
Guyana : Ref. 1254 ; EVINFO
Abstract
This report presents the results of the evaluation of the European Commission‘s support to the Republic of Guyana during the period 1997-2007. This country evaluation aims to provide an overall independent assessment of the Commission’s past and current cooperation relations with the Republic of Guyana, and to identify key lessons that would help improve the current and future strategies and programmes of the Commission.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. INTRODUCTION
OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION METHODOLOGY
2. STRATEGIC COOPERATION CONTEXT
2.1 THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION’S DEVELOPMENT POLICY
2.1.1 The European Commission’s global development policy
2.1.2 The European Commission’s development policy with ACP countries
2.2 GUYANA’S CONTEXT
2.2.1 The political context
2.2.2 The economic context
2.2.3 The social context
2.2.4 The environmental context
2.3 GUYANA’S DEVELOPMENT POLICY
2.3.1 Guyana’s National Development Strategy 2001-2010
2.3.2 Guyana’s Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP)
2.3.3 The National Competitiveness Strategy for Guyana
2.3.4 The Guyana Action Plan for the sugar sector
2.4 INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION IN GUYANA
3. THE COMMISSION’S COOPERATION STRATEGY
3.1 THE INTERVENTION LOGIC
3.2 THE COMMISSION’S COOPERATION STRATEGY AND ITS IMPLEMENTATION FOR GUYANA OVER THE PERIOD 1997-2007
3.2.1 The programmable instruments
3.2.2 The non programmable instruments
3.3.3 Overview of the Commission’s cooperation strategy and its implementation over the period 1997-2007
4. EVALUATION QUESTIONS
4.1 COVERAGE OF EVALUATION QUESTIONS
4.2 ANSWERS TO EVALUATION QUESTIONS
4.2.1 EQ 1 : Relevance of the Strategy
4.2.2 EQ2 : Protection of coastal belt population
4.2.3 EQ 3: Production capacity
4.2.4 EQ 4 : Social conditions
4.2.5 EQ 5 : Social benefits to local communities
4.2.6 EQ 6 : Efficiency of implementation
| 4.2.7 EQ 7: Cross-Cutting Issues
4.2.8 EQ 8: Coordination, Complementarity and Coherence with other donors
5. OVERALL ASSESSMENT
5.1 COMMISSION STRATEGY
5.2 IMPLEMENTATION MODALITIES: FOCUS ON BUDGET SUPPORT
5.3 MAJOR CONSTRAINTS IN THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PROGRAMME: CAPACITY BUILDING AND BRAIN DRAIN
6. CONCLUSIONS
6.1 COMMISSION STRATEGY
6.2 IMPACTS OF THE INTERVENTIONS
6.3. IMPLEMENTATION MODALITIES
7. RECOMMENDATIONS
7.1 TO REINFORCE THE COHERENCE, IMPACT AND SUSTAINABILITY OF THE COMMISSION’S STRATEGY IN LINE WITH THE GOG’S DEVELOPMENT POLICY AND OTHER DONOR INTERVENTIONS
7.2 TO FOSTER EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF COMMISSION INTERVENTIONS
Volume II
ANNEX 1 – TERMS OF REFERENCE
ANNEX 2 – INFORMANTS MET BEFORE THE FIELD MISSION
ANNEX 3 – FIELD MISSION PLANNING & INFORMANTS MET
ANNEX 4 –BASIC ECONOMIC INDICATORS
ANNEX 5 – INTERNATIONAL DONOR COOPERATION
ANNEX 6 – PRESENTATION OF THE EVALUATION QUESTIONS
ANNEX 7 – INFORMATION MATRIX
ANNEX 8 - LIST OF INTERVENTIONS
ANNEX 9 – BIBLIOGRAPHY
Author (Corp. Body): EGEVAL
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen
Year: 2008
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Ref. Ares(2010)230470 | Ref. 1254
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: Development AidGuyanaevaluationdevelopment aid policyEUEuropean Commissionskilled workerfinancial assistance
Guianacooperation
Subject: Economic aid and technical assistanceEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIBEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesGuyana
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of Commission's aid delivery through Development Banks and EIB : Final report ; Volume I
Title (other): Evaluation of Commission's aid delivery through Development Banks and EIB : Final Report ; Volume IIa – Annexes 1 to 10
| Evaluation of Commission's aid delivery through Development Banks and EIB : Final report ; Volume IIb – Annexes 11
and 12 on Evaluation Methodology | Evaluation of Commission's aid delivery through Development Banks and EIB : Inventory
Note (final) | Evaluation of EC aid delivery through development banks and EIB | Evaluation of EC's aid delivery through
development banks and EIB : Ref. 1255 ; EVINFO | Fiche Contradictoire : Evaluation of the EC aid delivery through
development banks and EIB
Abstract
This evaluation commissioned by the European Commission aims at providing an overall independent assessment of its aid delivery through Development Banks and the EIB during the period 1999-2006. It concerns financial flows or “channelling” from the Commission to the aforementioned institutions and covers all geographical areas where such aid delivery took place, except for OECD countries and countries within the mandate of Directorate General Enlargement. It focuses on the funding provided by the Commission’s Directorate General for External Relations (DG RELEX), Directorate General for Development (DG DEV), and EuropeAid Co-operation Office (AIDCO) to the World Bank (WB) and the European Investment Bank (EIB).[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
OPERATIONAL DEFINITIONS OF KEY TERMS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
1. EVALUATION OBJECTIVES, SCOPE AND CONTEXT
1.1 EVALUATION OBJECTIVES AND SCOPE
1.2 OVERALL FRAMEWORK OF THE COOPERATION
1.3 INVENTORY OF FUNDS CHANNELLED
2. EVALUATION METHODOLOGY
2.1 EVALUATION PROCESS AND STRUCTURE
2.2 EVALUATION APPROACH AND INFORMATION SOURCES
2.2.1 A structured approach
2.2.2 Detailed description of the different building stones of the evaluation
2.3 CHALLENGES AND LIMITS
3. ANSWERS TO EVALUATION QUESTIONS
3.1 EVALUATION QUESTION 1 ON THE RATIONALE BEHIND THE CHANNELLING
3.1.1 Decision-making process and guidance
3.1.2 The rationale behind the channelling
3.1.3 Reasons for the observed evolution in channelled aid
3.2 EVALUATION QUESTION 2 ON SCALING UP OF AID
3.2.1 Evolution of ODA and the link with channelling
3.2.2 Facilitation of disbursement by the Commission and to the beneficiaries
3.2.3 Leverage effects of the Commission’s financial contributions and presence
3.3 EVALUATION QUESTION 3 ON RESULTS/IMPACT
3.3.1 Coherence of objectives
3.3.2 Sustainable achievement of results
3.3.3 Availability of information
3.4 EVALUATION QUESTION 4 ON EXPERTISE
3.5 EVALUATION QUESTION 5 ON COST REDUCTION & IMPLEMENTATION
3.5.1 Delays and disbursement
3.5.2 Transaction costs
3.5.3 Procedures: FA and AA
3.6 EVALUATION QUESTION 6 ON VISIBILITY AND INFLUENCE
3.6.1 Evolution of and compliance with the visibility requirements
3.6.2 Effects of visibility actions on stakeholders’ awareness
3.6.3 The Commission’s involvement through its channelling
| 3.7 EVALUATION QUESTION 7 ON COORDINATION &COMPLEMENTARITY
3.7.1 Consultation with EU MS
3.7.2 Coordination of policy dialogue
3.7.3 Coverage of beneficiaries’ needs
4. OVERALL ASSESSMENT AND CONCLUSIONS
4.1 OVERALL ASSESSMENT
4.2 RATIONALE AND EVOLUTION OF AID DELIVERY THROUGH THE WB AND THE EIB
Conclusion 1: Increase in funding as intended
Conclusion 2: Strategic approach
Conclusion 3: Different use of WB and EIB
Conclusion 4: Coordination with EU MS
4.3 ADDED VALUE OF AID DELIVERY THROUGH THE WB AND THE EIB
Conclusion 5: Added value of the channelling through the WB and EIB
4.4 EFFECTIVENESS OF AID DELIVERY THROUGH THE WB AND THE EIB
Conclusion 6: Promotion of EU policies
Conclusion 7: Attainment of results
4.5 IMPLEMENTATION AND FOLLOW-UP OF AID ELIVERY THROUGH THE WB AND THE EIB
Conclusion 8: Commission’s organisational set-up
Conclusion 9: Framework Agreement
Conclusion 10: Delays and cost reduction
Conclusion 11: Single-donor WB TFs
Conclusion 12: Interaction Commission - WB
4.6 VISIBILITY
Conclusion 13: Visibility and awareness
4.7 CHANNELLING THROUGH THE EIB-WB-UN
5. RECOMMENDATIONS
5.1 STRATEGY AND FRAMEWORK
5.2 ORGANISATIONAL SET-UP AND INTERACTION
5.3 MANAGEMENT TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY AND EFFECTIVENESS
5.4 VISIBILITY
| Volume IIa
Annex 1 – Terms of Reference, Launch Note and approach for an extended desk phase
Annex 2 – Evaluation Questions, Judgement Criteria, Indicators and sources of Information
Annex 3 – Description Fiches for the selection of interventions Annex 4 – Data Collection Grid for the selection of interventions
Annex 5 – Study of the EC contribution to the HIPC Initiative
Annex 6 – Survey questionnaire
Annex 7 – Survey results
Annex 8 – Country missions’ debriefing presentations
Annex 9 – List of persons met
Annex 10 – Bibliography
Author (Corp. Body): Aide à la Décision Economique
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung, Information | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Außenbeziehungen
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid
Year: 2008
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Ref. 1255
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: EU countriesDevelopment bankDevelopment Aidevaluationdevelopment aidEUEuropean Investment BankEuropean Commission
financial assistanceWorld Bank
Subject: Economic aid and technical assistanceAid institutionsEuropean Community funds and other financial instrumentsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://europa.eu/)
Title: 8th Civil Society Forum on Drugs : 24-25 June 2013, Brussels
Author (Corp. Body): Civil Society Forum on Drugs
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz
Year: 2013
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: drug policyEUEuropean Commissioninformation flowcivil society
Subject: European Community institutionsSocial problemsPharmacology and toxicology
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: 7th Civil Society Forum on Drugs: 19-20 April 2012, Brussels
Author (Corp. Body): Civil Society Forum on Drugs
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz
Year: 2012
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: drug policyEUEuropean Commissioninformation flowcivil society
Subject: European Community institutionsSocial problemsPharmacology and toxicology
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: 6th Civil Society Forum on Drugs (CSF)
Author (Corp. Body): Civil Society Forum on Drugs
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz
Year: 2011
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: drug policyEUEuropean Commissioninformation flowcivil society
Subject: European Community institutionsSocial problemsPharmacology and toxicology
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Fourth Civil Society Forum on Drugs in the European Union : Brussels 13-14 December 2010 ; Final report
Author (Corp. Body): Civil Society Forum on Drugs
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz
Year: 2010
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: drug policyEUEuropean Commissioninformation flowcivil society
Subject: European Community institutionsSocial problemsPharmacology and toxicology
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Third Civil Society Forum on Drugs in the European Union : Brussels 4-5 March 2009 ; FINAL REPORT
Author (Corp. Body): Civil Society Forum on Drugs in the EU
Publisher: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz und Inneres
Year: 2009
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: drug policyEUEuropean Commissioninformation flowcivil society
Subject: European Community institutionsSocial problemsPharmacology and toxicology
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Report on the results of the open consultation : Green Paper on the role of civil society in drugs policy in the
European Union (COM(2006) 316 final) ; Brussels, 18 April 2007
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission
Year: 2007
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: drug policyEUEuropean Commissionhealth careinformation flowcivil society
Subject: European Community institutionsSocial problemsPharmacology and toxicology
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: External evaluation of the European Year of Creativity and Innovation 2009: Final Report
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Bildung und Kultur
Contributer: ECOTEC Research and Consulting Limited, Birmingham
Year: 2009
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: European Commissioninnovationcreativity
Subject: Cultural policy
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Quelle / Source: http://ec.europa.eu | Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document
Title: Myth-busting: what Commission proposals on data protection DO and DON'T mean
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Justiz
Year: 2012
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: data protectionEUEuropean Commission
Subject: European Community institutionsEuropean Community law in generalLaw of personsInformation transfer
Countries Scheme: Europe. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Main missions of DEVCO Directorates & Units
Table of Contents
Deputy Director General Coordination (Dir. A, B, D & E)
Deputy Director General Coordination (Dir. C, G, H & Task Force Knowledge, Performance and Results)
01 – General Coordination and Inter-institutional Relations
02 – Communication and Transparency
Head of Task Force Knowledge, Performance and Results-Principal Adviser
03 – Knowledge Management
04 – Evaluation
05 – Operational Information Systems
06 – Quality and results
Task Force "Overseas Countries and Territories"
Policy Definition - Principal Adviser
Directorate A – EU Development Policy and International Cooperation
A1 – Policy and Coherence
A2 – Aid and Development Effectiveness and Financing
A3 – International Cooperation and Dialogue
A4 – Budget Support and Public Finance Management
Directorate B – Human Development and Migration and Directorate C – Sustainable Growth and Development

B1 – Human Rights, Gender, Democratic Governance, B2 – Civil Society, Local Authorities, B3 – Migration, Employment, Inequalities, B4 – Education, Health, Research, Culture and B5 – Stability, Security, Development and Nuclear Safety, B7 –Fragility and Resilience, C1 – Rural development, Food Security, Nutrition, C2 –Environment, Ecosystems, Biodiversity, and Wildlife, C4 – Private Framework Development, Trade, Regional Integration, C5 – Water, Infrastructures and Cities, C6 – Sustainable Energy and Climate Change
C3 – Financial Instruments
Directorate D – Development Coordination East and Southern Africa, Directorate E – Development Coordination West and Central Africa, Directorate G – Development Coordination Latin America and Caribbean, Directorate H – Development Coordination Asia, Central Asia, Middle East/Gulf and Pacific
D1 – Development Coordination Southern Africa and Indian Ocean, D2 – Development Coordination East Africa and Regional Cooperation in Eastern and Southern Africa, E1 – Development Coordination and Regional Cooperation Central Africa, E2 – Development Coordination and Regional Coopera | E2 – Development Coordination and Regional Cooperation West Africa, G1 – Development Coordination Latin America and Caribbean, H1 – Development Coordination South and South East Asia and H2 – Development Coordination Central Asia, Middle East/Gulf and Pacific
D3 - ACP Coordination
D4 – Africa - EU Partnership and African Peace Facility
C7 – Thematic Programs intra ACP, G2 – Regional Operations Continental Latin America and Caribbean, and H2 – Development Coordination Central Asia, Middle East/Gulf and Pacific
B6 – Finance, Contracts, Audit, E3 – Finance, Contracts, Audit, G3 – Finance, Contracts, Audit H3 – Finance, Contracts, Audit and R5 –Local Support and Logistics
Directorate R - Resources in Headquarters and in Delegations
R1 – Planning and Budget
R2 – Audit and Control
R3 – Legal Affairs
R4 – Human Resources
R5 – Local Support and Logistics
R6 – Information Technology and Infrastructure
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Internationale Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung, Brüssel
Year: 2015
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: course of workdevelopment aid policyEUEuropean Commissionproject management
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community institutions
Countries Scheme: Global ResourcesEurope. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Information note on multidonor trust funds supported by the European Union : Budget since 2003
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission / Amt für Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Internationale Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung, Brüssel
Year: 2015
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: development aidEUEuropean Commissionfundingbudget document
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Global ResourcesEurope. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Policy Coherence for Development : 2015 EU Report
Title (other): SWD(2015) 159 final Commission Staff Working Document : Policy Coherence for Development ; 2015 EU Report
Abstract
Policy Coherence for Development (PCD) is a priority for the European Commission and mechanisms and procedures to avoid contradictions and build synergies between different EU policies have continued to improve since the last PCD report of 2013. The 2015 report covers both cross-cutting and thematic issues from 2013-15 and presents examples of progress on PCD across different policy areas.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Executive summary
Introduction
1 Promoting Policy Coherence for Development
1.1 Why Policy Coherence for Development?
1.2 PCD Actors: Roles and Contributions
1.3 European Commission: Mechanisms and Tools
1.4 Member States
1.5 Independent Assessments
2 Trade & Finance
2.1 Trade and Development
2.2 Improving Market Access
2.3 Corporate Social Respionsibility (CSR)
2.4 Good Tax Governance and Finance
3 Food Security
3.1 Agricultural Policy
3.2 Fisheries and Maritime Policy
4 Climate Change4.2 Environmental Actions
5 Migration
5.1 Migration Policy
5.2 Policy Dialogue and Partnerships
5.3 Legal Migration
5.4 Asylum and International Migration
6. Security
6.1 A Comprehensive Approach
6.2 Responding to Fragility
6.3 Building Capacity and Conflict Prevention
6.4 Women, Peace and Security: UN Security Council Resolution 1325
6.5 International Processes and Partnerships
7 Key Challenges Ahead
Annex / Glossary
Author (Corp. Body): Europäische Kommission
Publisher: Amt für Amtliche Veröffentlichungen, Luxemburg
Year: 2015
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: 978-92-79-50362-7 | 2466-9571 | MN-AN-15-001-EN-N | SWD(2015) 159 final
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: development aid policyEUEuropean Commissioncoordination
Subject: Development aid. Aid programmes and aid organizationsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Global ResourcesEurope. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Evaluation of Commission’s cooperation with the Council of Europe : An assessment focussed on EU funding of Joint
Programmes ; Final Report ; Volume I
Title (other): Evaluation of Commission’s cooperation with the Council of Europe : An assessment focussed on EU funding of Joint
Programmes ; Final Report ; Volume II | Evaluation of Commission’s cooperation with the Council of Europe : An
assessment focussed on EU funding of Joint Programmes ; Final Report ; Volume III | Evaluation of Commission’s
cooperation with the Council of Europe : An assessment focussed on EU funding of Joint Programmes ; Final Report ;
Volume IV | Evaluation of the Commission’s cooperation with the Council of Europe : Fiche Contradictoire ; Ref.
Ares(2013)3372167 | Evaluation of the Commission’s cooperation with the Council of Europe : Final Report | Evaluation
of the Commission’ cooperation with the Council of Europe (2000-2010) : (focused on the joint programmes) ; ref. 1311 ;
EVINFO | Evaluation of Commission’s cooperation with the Council of Europe : Executive Summary
Abstract
This Final Report presents the outcome of the “Evaluation of Commission’s cooperation with the Council of Europe (CoE)”. It was commissioned by the DG DEVCO Evaluation Unit and was implemented between December 2010 and July 2012. The evaluation provides an independent assessment of the European Commission’s (EC’s) past and current cooperation with the CoE by looking at how relevant, efficient, effective and visible this cooperation has been in supporting sustainable impact for the protection, promotion and dissemination of European values on the European continent and beyond. The evaluation identifies relevant key lessons learned from the EC-CoE cooperation, in order to provide recommendations for the future of the EC-CoE cooperation.The evaluation covers the period from 2000 to 2010. All regions where the EC cooperation with partner countries is implemented through the CoE were included in the scope of this evaluation. The main thematic focus of the evaluation was the EC channelling of aid through the CoE in the form of Joint Programmes (JPs); however, the broader strategic aspects of the relationship between the two institutions were taken into account as well.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
1 Introduction
1.1 Objective and scope of the evaluation
1.2 Structure of the report
2 Methodology
2.1 Stages of the evaluation process
2.2 Challenges and limitations
3 Background and context
3.1 An overview: History of cooperation between the CoE and the EC
3.2 EC-CoE Joint programmes
4 Intervention logic of the EC-CoE cooperation
5 Inventory
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Findings
6 Answers to the Evaluation Questions
6.1 EQ1: To what extent have the criteria for decisions to cooperate with the CoE been clear, transparent and strategically sound?
6.2 EQ2: To what extent has the cooperation with the CoE, in particular via the channelling of funds, enabled the EC to use the CoE’s specific sectoral expertise and mandate and geographical scope in the key areas of cooperation?
6.3 EQ3: To what extent has the cooperation with the CoE, in particular via the channelling of funds, contributed to increasing respect for human rights and fundamental freedoms?
6.4 EQ4: To what extent has cooperation with the CoE, in particular via the channelling of funds, contributed to strengthening the rule of law as it relates to the fight against corruption, money laundering, organised crime and trafficking?
6.5 EQ5: To what extent has the cooperation with the CoE, in particular via the channelling of funds, contributed to strengthening the rule of law as it relates to legal systems and access to justice?
6.6 EQ6: To what extent has the cooperation with the CoE, in particular via the channelling of funds, contributed to establishing stronger democratic institutions and practices at central and local level?
6.7 EQ7: To what extent have the implementation modalities of Joint Programmes employed by the CoE been appropriate to help achieving EC objectives related to human rights, rule of law, and democracy?
| 6.8 EQ8: To what extent has the cooperation with the CoE, in particular via the channelling of funds, helped to enhance complementarity and synergies between the EC and the CoE?
6.9 Overall assessment of the EC-CoE cooperation
7 Conclusions and recommendations
7.1 Conclusions
7.2 Recommendations
List of tables
List of figures
List of acronyms
VOLUME II: DETAILED INFORMATION MATRIX
1. EQ1: Guidance criteria
2. EQ2: Specific expertise
3. EQ3: Impacts in Human rights
4. EQ4: Impacts in Rule of Law I
5. EQ5: Impacts in Rule of Law II
6. EQ6: Impacts in Democracy
7. EQ7: Implementation
8. EQ8: Complementarity and Synergies
VOLUME III: FIELD VISIT COUNTRY NOTES
1. Armenia
2. Moldova
3. Serbia
4. Turkey
VOLUME IV: ANNEXES
Annex 1: Final evaluation matrix
Annex 2: Synthesis of evaluation reports
Annex 3: Results of survey to EU Delegations
Annex 4: Inventory
Annex 5: List of EC-CoE contracts
Annex 6: Thematic case studies
Annex 7: List of people consulted
Annex 8: Key sources consulted
Annex 9: Terms of Reference
Author: MacKellar, Forrest Landis ; 17055242X | Devine, Vera | Twomey, Patrick
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit – EuropeAid | PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt, Freiburg im Breisgau | ADE | DRN | Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, Berlin
Year: 2012
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: EuropeAid/122888/C/SER/Multi | Ref. Ares(2013)3372167 | Ref. 1311
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: Armeniaevaluationconception of democracydevelopment aidEUEuropean CommissionCouncil of Europecooperation
human rightsprogramconstitutional stateSerbiaTurkey
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relationsHuman rights
Countries Scheme: Global ResourcesEurope. General ResourcesMoldovaSerbiaArmenia
Turkey
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Thematic global evaluation of the Commission support to decentralisation processes : Final Report ; Volume 1
Title (other): Thematic global evaluation of the Commission support to decentralisation processes : Final Report ; Volume 2a | Thematic
global evaluation of the Commission support to decentralisation processes : Final Report ; Volume 2b | Thematic global
evaluation of the Commission support to decentralisation processes : Final Report ; Volume 2c | Fiche Contradictoire :
Evaluation of the Commission of the European Union support to decentralisation processes | Quality Grid : Evaluation of
"EC support to decentralisation processes" ; Final report | Thematic Evaluation of the European Commission Support to
Decentralisation processes
Abstract
This Final Report presents the outcome of the “Thematic global evaluation of the Commission support to decentralisation processes”. The Evaluation was commissioned by the DG DEVCO Evaluation Unit and was implemented between January 2010 and February 2012.The purpose of the evaluation is to identify key relevant lessons and to provide recommendations to help ensure opportune and timely support to decentralisation processes.The evaluation covers EC aid delivery over the period 2000-2009 (within the context of the programmes managed by DG DEVCO).The evaluation aims to assess to what extent the EC assistance has been relevant, coherent, effective, efficient and sustainable in providing the expected impacts in the support of decentralisation processes, along with the EU added value. Moreover, it aims to analyse the coherence with the relevant EU policies and the partner governments' priorities and activities.In terms of geographical scope, the evaluation covers all regions where EC cooperation has been implemented ? including countries where the partnership between the government and the EU has been difficult ? but does not include regions and countries under the mandate of DG Enlargement, the OECD countries, and activities that fall under the responsibility of the EC Humanitarian Aid and Civil Protection department.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Executive Summary
1 Introduction
1.1 Synthesis of the EC strategy and programmes
1.2 The Evaluation Questions
2 Methodology
2.1 Key steps of the evaluation process
2.2 Developing the methodological framework (structuring phase)
2.3 Collecting data (Desk Study and Field Phase): Overview of process and tools
2.4 Analysing and judging: Synthesis Phase
2.5 Dissemination
2.6 Challenges and limits of the evaluation
3 Answers to the Evaluation Questions
3.1 EQ1: Policy framework
3.2 EQ2: Institutional capacity
3.3 EQ3: National context
3.4 EQ4: 3Cs
3.5 EQ5: Transfer of functions and resources
3.6 EQ6: Stakeholders? capacities
3.7 EQ7: Local governance
3.8 EQ8: Service delivery
3.9 Overall assessment of the EC Strategy
4 Conclusions and recommendations
4.1 Conclusions
4.2 Recommendations
List of tables
List of figures
List of boxes
List of acronyms
| VOLUME IIA: ANNEX 1 - DETAILED INFORMATION MATRIX
1. EQ1: Policy framework
2. EQ2: Institutional capacity
3. EQ3: National context
4. EQ4: 3Cs
5. EQ5: Transfer of functions & resources
6. EQ6: Stakeholders’ capacities
7. EQ7: Local governance
8. EQ8: Service delivery
VOLUME IIB: ANNEX 2 TO 10
1. Annex 2: Terms of Reference
2. Annex 3: Inventory
3. Annex 4: Results of the survey to EU Delegations
4. Annex 5: MTRs & JARs analysis
5. Annex 6: CSP analysis
6. Annex 7: CSE analysis
7. Annex 8: ROM analysis
8. Annex 9: Evaluation Matrix
9. Annex 10: List of People Interviewed
VOLUME IIC: ANNEXE 11 - COUNTRY NOTES
1. Benin
2. Honduras
3. Lebanon
4. Mali
5. Peru
6. The Philippines
7. Rwanda
8. Sierra Leone
9. South Africa
10. Tanzania
Author (Corp. Body): PARTICIP GmbH Consultants für Entwicklung und Umwelt, Freiburg im Breisgau
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | ADE | DRN | Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, Berlin | European Centre for Development Policy Management | Overseas Devel
Year: 2012
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Ref.: EuropeAid/122888/C/SER/Multi | Request for Service: 2009/226838
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: Beninevaluationdecentralizationdevelopment aidEUEuropean Commissionfinancial assistanceHonduras
LebanonMaliPeruPhilippinesRepublic of South AfricaRwandaSierra LeoneTanzania
Subject: Aid programmesEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesHondurasPeruRwandaTanzaniaSouth Africa
BeninMaliSierra LeoneLebanonPhilippines
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Study on Legal Instruments and Lessons Learned from the Evaluations Managed by the Joint Evaluation Unit : Final Report
; Volume 1: Final Summary Report
Title (other): Study on Legal Instruments and Lessons Learned from the Evaluations Managed by the Joint Evaluation Unit : Final Report
; Volume 2 The Intervention Logics | Study on Legal Instruments and Lessons Learned from the Evaluations Managed by the
Joint Evaluation Unit : Final Report ; Volume 3 The Review of Evaluation Reports
Abstract
The overall purpose of this study was to see what lessons could be learnt from the past experience of EC external action programmes that might be useful in the design and formulation of the EU’s next multi-annual budget. In addition, the study also sought to identify lessons which could improve the design of future evaluations.[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
Acronyms
Executive summary
1 Introduction
1.1 CONTEXT OF THE STUDY
1.2 OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY
2 Conceptual Framework
2.1 ROLE OF REGULATIONS/LEGAL INSTRUMENTS
2.2 ROLE OF IMPACT ASSESSMENT OF THE INSTRUMENTS
2.3 RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEGAL INSTRUMENTS AND RELATED STRATEGIES
2.4 STRATEGIES AS A BASIS FOR EVALUATIONS
3 Methodology
3.1 SCOPE AND FOCUS OF THE STUDY
3.2 METHODOLOGY FOR THE STUDY PHASES
3.2.1 Phase 1 (Inception Report): Preparation of Intervention Logics for Each LegalInstrument
3.2.2 Phase 2 (Desk Report): Impact Assessment of the Legal Instruments (IncludingComparison and Identification of Possible Gaps and Overlaps)
3.2.3 Phase 3 (Desk Report): Analysis and Synthesis of Evaluations
3.2.4 Phase 4 (Final Report): Developing Options for Future Legal Instruments
4 Phases 1 and 2: The Intervention Logic of the Legal Instruments
4.1 METHODOLOGY AND OVERALL FINDINGS
4.2 KEY FINDINGS PER PHASE
4.2.1 Key Findings from Phase 1
4.2.2 Key Findings of Phase 2
4.3 IMPLICATIONS FOR THE FUTURE LEGAL INSTRUMENTS
5 Phase 3: Linking Evaluation Results (2006-2011) to the Legal Instruments Objectives
5.1 METHODOLOGY AND OVERALL FINDINGS
5.2 KEY FINDINGS PER INSTRUMENT: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE FUTURE LEGAL INSTRUMENTS
5.2.1 The Development Cooperation Instrument (DCI)
5.2.2 European Neighbourhood and Partnership Instrument (ENPI)
5.2.3 European Instrument for the Promotion of Democracy and Human Rights (EIDHR)
5.2.4 Instrument for Nuclear Safety Cooperation (INSC)
5.2.5 The Instrument for Stability (IfS)
5.2.6 Instrument for Cooperation with Industrialised and Other High-Income Countries(ICI)
5.3 OVERALL CONCLUSIONS BASED ON THE EVALUATION EVIDENCE
5.3.1 Horizontal conclusions: Implications for the Future Legal Instruments
5.3.2 Horizontal conclusions: Implications for Future Evaluation Programme
| 6 Phase 4 : recommendations for the Future legal instruments and their evaluation
6.1 IMPLICATIONS FOR THE FUTURE LEGAL INSTRUMENTS
6.1.1 Overall Assessment
6.1.2 The Specificities of the Individual Instruments
6.1.3 Improving the logic of future instruments
6.1.4 Identifying principles of good intervention logic design
6.1.5 Building the logic of an instrument from first principles
6.1.6 Horizontal Recommendations Applying to All Future Legal Instruments
6.1.7 Conclusion and recommendations for the new legal instruments
6.2 PROPOSALS FOR THE EVALUATION OF ACTIVITIES IN THE FUTURE PROGRAMMING PERIOD
6.2.1 Recommendation A: Improve explicit links between evaluation and the legalinstruments
6.2.2 Recommendation B: Adequate and timely coverage of all legal instruments
6.2.3 Recommendation C: Adequate baselines and ex-ante impact assessment as a basisfor future evaluations
6.2.4 Recommendation D: Provisions for synthesis evaluations and communication ofevaluation findings to Council and Parliament
7 Concluding Remarks
8 Bibliography
Annex: Reconstructed Intervention Logics
| VOLUME 2: THE INTERVENTION LOGICS
1. Introduction: The Intervention Logics for the Legal Instruments
2. Phase 1: Constructing the Faithful Intervention Logics
2.1 Step 1: Analysis of the Legal Instruments / Intervention Logic Diagrams
2.2 Step 2: Comparison of Legal Instruments
3. Phase 2: Analysing the Reconstructed Intervention Logics
3.1 Evidence Collected
3.2 Synthesis of the Evidence from Phase 2
3.3 Some Critical Questions Emerging from Phase 2
Annex 1: Comparing the 2004 DCECI Proposal with the 2006 DCI Regulation
Annex 2: Comparing the 2004 ENPI Proposal with the 2006 ENPI Regulation
Annex 3: Comparing the 2004 DCECI Proposal with the 2006 ICI Regulation
Annex 4: Comparing the Original EC Proposal on the EIDHR (2006) with the Changes
Introduced to the Final Text of the Regulation (2006)
Annex 5: Comparing the Nuclear SafetyProvisions in the 2004 IfS Proposal with the 2007 INSC Regulation
Annex 6: Faithful Intervention Logics
Annex 7: Reconstructed Intervention Logics
VOLUME 3: THE REVIEW OF EVALUATION REPORTS
About this Volume
1. Analysis of the Evaluation Evidence
2. Synthesis of the Phase 3 Evidence on the Six Legal Instruments
3. Review of Evidence on Implementation Issues
Annex 1: Grid for Analysing Evaluation Reports
Annex 2: Trends in Management, Modality, Approach and Performance
Author (Corp. Body): European Centre for Development Policy Management
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Aide a? la De?cision Economique, Ottignies Louvain la Neuve | Development Researchers Network | Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik, Be
Year: 2011
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: EuropeAid/122888/C/SER/Multi | Request for Service: 2010/247813
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: foreign policyevaluationdevelopment aid policyEUEuropean Commissionbudget documentplanning instrument
Subject: Development aid. Aid programmes and aid organizationsEuropean Community funds and financial instruments. EIBEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Global ResourcesEurope. General Resources
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
Title: Country Level Evaluation Republic of Malawi : Final Report ; Volume 1: Main Report
Title (other): Country Level Evaluation Republic of Malawi : Final Report ; Volume 2: Annexes | Fiche Contradictoire : Evaluation of
the Commission’s support to Malawi | Quality Grid : CLE Malawi ; Final Report, Oct 2011 | Evaluation of the European
Commission's Co-operation with the Republic of Malawi : Country Level Evaluation ; EVINFO
Abstract
This evaluation of the European Commission?s (EC) co-operation with Malawi was carried out in 2010 and 2011. The main objectives of the evaluation were provision of an independent assessment to the Commission of the EU and to the wider public of the Commission`s past and current co-operation relations with Malawi and to identify key lessons in order to improve the current and future strategies and programmes of the Commission of the EU.The evaluation covers co-operation strategies and implementation including a mix of all activities and modalities during the period 2003-2010 (implementation of the European Development Fund (EDF8 & EDF9, and programming of EDF10). During this period the support of the Commission included focal sectors (regional development, agriculture and food security, regional inter-connection – local and regional road transport), non-focal sectors (support to trade and investment, fight against HIV/AIDS and governance (civic education, justice and support to Non-State Actors) and cross-cutting issues (including environment, sustainability and gender issues).[Author vide copyright]
Table of Contents
5.10 Choice of EC aid modalities contributing to the efficiency of EC support
6. Conclusions
6.1 Primary conclusions
6.2 Complementary (supporting) conclusions
6.2.1 Issues arising from and impacting on preparation and implementation of SWAps and budget support (PC1)
6.2.2 Management of modalities (PC2)
6.2.3 Aspects of governance (PC3)
6.2.4 Complementarity and coordination
6.2.5 Regional integration (PC5)
6.2.6 Cross-cutting issues
6.2.7 Agriculture and food security
7. Recommendations
7.1 Improving implementation effectiveness and sustainability
7.2 Maximising the impacts of SWAps and budget support
7.3 Management of modalities
7.4 Aspects of governance
7.5 Regional integration
7.6 Cross-cutting issues
7.7 Agriculture and food security
| Volume I- Main Report
1. Introduction
1.1 Origin and Objectives of the Evaluation
1.2 Scope of the Evaluation
1.3 Purpose and Structure of the Draft Final Report
2. Methodology of the Evaluation
2.1 Evaluation Questions, Judgement Criteria and Indicators
2.2 Data Collection
2.3 Data Reliability and Analysis
2.4 Difficulties, Limitations (and Mitigation Measures)
3. EC- Malawi Co-operation Context
3.1 Broad Characteristics of Malawi
3.2 Political and Institutional Situation
3.3 Economy, Commerce and Private Sector
3.4 Governance
3.5 Malawi?s Development Strategies
3.6 Development Assistance
4. EC Strategy and Intervention Logic
4.1 General Framework and Principles of the EC co-operation
4.2 EC Intervention Logic
4.2.1 Evolution of EC Strategy and Support
4.2.2 EDF9
4.2.3 EDF10
4.3 Implementation
4.3.1 Budget Support
4.3.2 Focal Areas
4.3.3 Non-Focal Areas
4.3.4 Cross-Cutting Issues
5. Answers to Evaluation Questions
5.1 Response to the changing needs of the Malawian population and those expressed by GoM
5.2 EC contribution to agriculture-led economic growth
5.3 EC contribution to food security
5.4 Contribution of EC support to sector management of a road network that provides appropriate service levels
5.5 Contribution of EC support to the road sector for improved regional connectivity
5.6 Contribution of EC support to capacity building in trade negotiations and related reforms to regional integration
5.7 EC budget support and associated policy dialogue?s contribution to stabilising the external and fiscal balances
5.8 EC budget support contribution to improving PFM and to orienting budgetary priorities and actual expenditures towards poverty reduction
5.9 Contribution of EC support to Rule of Law (civic education and justice) and NSAs to increased participation and oversight of civic society in governmental and parliamentary decision-making processes
| Volume 2 – Annexes
1. EVALUATION MATRICES
2. INTERVENTION LOGICS
3. ACTIVITIES OF THE FIELD PHASE
4. SYNTHESIS PHASE
5. PROJECT INVENTORY
6. LIST OF PERSONS INTERVIEWED
7. FOCUS GROUP FICHES
8. ACTIVITY SCHEDULE OF FIELD PHASE
9. WORK PLAN
10. COUNTRY INFORMATION
11. EC STRATEGY AND INTERVENTION LOGIC
12. MALAWI’S PROGRESS TOWARDS ACHIEVING THE MDGS
13. BIBLIOGRAPHY
14. PROJECT FICHES
15. DISSEMINATION SEMINAR SEPTEMBER 29TH, 2011 – MINUTES
16. DISSEMINATION SEMINAR – PRESENTATION
17. TOR
Author (Corp. Body): ECO Consult
Contributer: Europäische Kommission / Generaldirektion Entwicklung und Zusammenarbeit EuropeAid | Arbeitsgemeinschaft Entwicklungspolitischer Gutachter | APRI | Euronet | Institut de Recherches dApplications des Me?thodes de De?veloppement,
Year: 2011
ISBN / ISSN / Kat.Nr: Contract No EVA 2007/geo-acp
Language: en
Ressource: Einzelne Berichte, Studien
Keyword: AIDSevaluationdevelopment aidEUEuropean Commissiongender mainstreaminggovernancecommerce
investmentcooperationagricultureMalawisustainable developmentfoodregional developmentroad trafficenvironment
Subject: Development aid. Aid programmes and aid organizationsEuropean Community external relations
Countries Scheme: Europe. General ResourcesMalawi
Online Ressource: vorübergehend nicht erreichbar!
Bitte beachten Sie die urheberrechtlichen Bedingungen der Dokumentenbenutzung / Please observe the copyright when accessing the document | Quelle / Source: Europäische Kommission (http://ec.europa.eu/)
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6
« Previous
Next »
Copyright (C) 2003-2019 European Documentation Centres / Update: 09.10.2019